Refuge-Specific Public Use Regulations for Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge, 57242-57247 [05-19570]
Download as PDF
57242
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Proposed Rules
price less profit) conducted under this
contract. Any deviation from this
requirement must be approved in
advance and in writing by the
Contracting Officer. Since the selection
of R&D contractors is substantially
based on the best scientific and
technological sources, it is important
that the Contractor not subcontract
technical or scientific work without the
Contracting Officer’s advance approval.
(End of clause)
1852.219–82 Limitation on
Subcontracting—STTR Program.
As prescribed in 1819.7302(c), insert
the following clause in all SBIR and
STTR solicitations and contracts:
Limitation on Subcontracting—STTR
Program (XX/XX)
The Contractor (small business
concern (SBC)) shall perform a
minimum of 40 percent of the work
under this contract (total contract price
including cost sharing, if any, less profit
if any). A minimum of 30 percent of the
work under this contract shall be
performed by the research institution
(RI). Since the selection of R&D
contractors is substantially based on the
best scientific and technological
sources, it is important that the
contractor not subcontract technical or
scientific work without the Contracting
Officer’s advance approval.
(End of clause)
1852.219–83 Limitation of the Principal
Investigator—SBIR Program OR Principal
Investigator—Primary Employment—SBIR
Program.
As prescribed in 1819.7302(d), insert
the following clause in all SBIR
solicitations and contracts:
Limitation of the Principal
Investigator—SBIR Program OR
Principal Investigator—Primary
Employment—SBIR Program (XX/XX)
The primary employment of the
principal investigator shall be with the
small business concern (SBC)/
Contractor during the conduct of this
contract. Primary employment means
that more than one-half of the principal
investigator’s time is spent in the
employ of the Contractor/SBC. This
precludes full-time employment with
another organization. Deviations from
these requirements must be approved in
advance and in writing by the
Contracting Officer and are not subject
to a change in the firm-fixed price of the
contract. The PI for this contract is
(insert name).
(End of Clause)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:30 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
1852.219–84 Limitation of the Principal
Investigator—STTR Program.
As prescribed in 1819.7302(e), insert
the following clause in all STTR
solicitations and contracts:
Limitation of the Principal
Investigator—STTR Program (XX/XX)
(a) The primary employment of the
principal investigator (PI) identified in
this STTR contract is with the small
business concern (SBC)/Contractor or
the research institution (RI). Primary
employment means that more than onehalf of the principal investigator’s time
is spent in the employ of the contractor/
SBC or RI.
(b) The principal investigator (PI) is
considered to be key personnel in the
performance of this contract and may
not have been employed by the
contractor/SBC. The Contractor/SBC
whether or not the employer of the PI
shall exercise primary management
direction and control over the PI and be
overall responsible for the PI’s
performance under this contract.
Deviations from these requirements
must be approved in advance and in
writing by the Contracting Officer and
are not subject to a change in the firmfixed price of the contract. The PI for
this contract is (insert name).
(End of Clause)
5. Section 1852.232–83 is added to
read as follows:
5. For STTR contracts: The
subcontracting limitation set forth in
this contract was not exceeded;
6. For SBIR contracts: The primary
employment of the principal
investigator (PI) identified in this SBIR
contract was with the Contractor, except
as approved in writing by the
Contracting Officer on (insert date of
approval or modification number.); and
7. For STTR contracts: The primary
employment of the principal
investigator (PI) identified in this STTR
contract was the SBC/Contractor or the
research institution (RI). The PI
identified in the STTR contract was
considered key in the performance of
this contract and may not have been
employed by the Contractor/SBC.
However, the Contractor/SBC did
exercise primary management direction
and control over the PI and was overall
responsible for the PI’s performance
under this contract. Any substitutions of
this individual were approved in
writing by the Contracting Officer on
(insert date of approval or modification
number.).
I understand that the willful provision
of false information or concealing a
material fact in this representation is a
criminal offense under Title 18 U.S.C.,
Section 1001, False Statements, as well
as Title 18 U.S.C., Section 287, False
Claims.
(End of Clause)
[FR Doc. 05–19399 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am]
1852.232–83 Conditions for Final
Payment—SBIR and STTR Contracts.
BILLING CODE 7510–01–P
As prescribed in 1832.1210, insert the
following clause in all SBIR and STTR
solicitations and contracts:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Conditions for Final Payment—SBIR
and STTR Contracts (XX/XX)
As a condition for final payment
under this contract, the Contractor shall
provide the following certifications as
part of its final payment invoice request:
During performance of this contract—
1. Essentially equivalent work
performed under this contract has not
been proposed for funding to another
Federal agency;
2. No other Federal funding award has
been received for essentially equivalent
work performed under this contract;
3. Deliverable items submitted under
this contract have not been submitted as
deliverable items under another Federal
funding award;
4. For SBIR contracts: The
subcontracting limitation set forth in
this contract was not exceeded except as
approved in writing by the Contracting
Officer on (insert date of approval or
modification number.);
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 36
RIN 1018–AU08
Refuge-Specific Public Use
Regulations for Kodiak National
Wildlife Refuge
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service) proposes to open private lands
within the boundaries of Kodiak
National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to
public use, with a permit, complying
with our commitments made under a
Conservation Easement among the
United States, the State of Alaska, and
Koniag, Inc. The Conservation Easement
furthers the missions of the Service and
the National Wildlife Refuge System
and the purposes of Kodiak National
Wildlife Refuge. The easement lands
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Proposed Rules
affected by this rule are along Karluk
River and Karluk Lake on Kodiak Island,
Alaska. The rule will apply as long as
the easement is in place. Without this
rule, the Service would fail to comply
with the terms of the Conservation
Easement.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before October 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
to Abbey Kucera, Kodiak National
Wildlife Refuge, 1390 Buskin River
Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615. See
Request for Public Comments section of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
information on electronic submission.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Abbey Kucera (907) 487–2600; Fax (907)
487–2144.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Kodiak
National Wildlife Refuge was
established in 1941 by Executive Order
for the purpose of protecting the natural
feeding and breeding ranges of brown
bears and other wildlife on Uganik and
Kodiak Islands. The lands now under
the Conservation Easement were once
refuge lands. The Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act of 1971 (43 U.S.C. 1601–
1624) (Act) allowed refuge lands to be
conveyed to Alaska Native Corporations
established under the Act, including the
lands now covered by this Conservation
Easement. In 2002, the Conservation
Easement was signed, calling for these
lands to be managed similarly to refuge
lands and requiring refuge-issued
permits for most public recreational use
of the Karluk River and Karluk Lake
lands.
Background About Kodiak Refuge
The Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 3101 et
seq., 43 U.S.C. 1602) expanded the
purposes for which Kodiak National
Wildlife Refuge was established to
include: (i) To conserve fish and
wildlife populations [and] habitats in
their natural diversity including, but not
limited to, Kodiak brown bears,
salmonids, sea otters, sea lions and
other marine mammals and migratory
birds; (ii) to fulfill the international
treaty obligations of the United States
with respect to fish and wildlife and
other habitats; (iii) to provide, in a
manner consistent with the purposes set
forth in subparagraphs (i) and (ii), the
opportunity for continued subsistence
uses by local residents; and (iv) to
ensure, to the maximum extent
practicable and in a manner consistent
with the purposes set forth in paragraph
(i), water quality and necessary water
quantity within the refuge.
Kodiak Refuge encompasses almost
two million acres in southwestern
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:30 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
Alaska, including about two-thirds of
Kodiak Island. The city of Kodiak,
where refuge headquarters are located,
is about 250 air miles south of
Anchorage, about 20 miles northeast of
the refuge boundary on Kodiak Island,
and about 60 air miles northeast of
Karluk Lake.
Kodiak Refuge is characterized by a
large range of habitats within a
relatively small geographic area.
Because of this, the refuge supports
some of the highest densities of brown
bears, nesting bald eagles, and spawning
salmon found anywhere in North
America. The mountainous interior of
Kodiak Island, with several peaks over
4,000 feet in elevation, is covered by
lush, dense vegetation during the
summer, with alpine vegetation on the
highest slopes. No place on the refuge
is more than 15 miles from the ocean.
Access to the refuge is primarily by float
plane and boat. Karluk River and Karluk
Lake have runs of all five species of
Pacific Salmon (chinook, sockeye, coho,
pink, and chum) and steelhead.
Rainbow trout, Dolly Varden, and Arctic
char are also found there.
Kodiak Refuge was established
primarily to protect the brown bear.
With an estimated population of 2,100
bears, the refuge contains some of the
best brown bear habitat in the world
supporting some of the highest
concentrations of brown bear found
anywhere in the world. These bears feed
on spawning salmon and forage
throughout most of the refuge. The
Karluk River drainage is one of the most
important fisheries to bears, with up to
200 bears using the Karluk area from
mid-June to the end of September.
Under our regulations implementing
the Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act (50 CFR 36.31), all
refuge lands in Alaska are open to
public recreational activities as long as
such activities are conducted in a
manner compatible with the purposes
for which the refuge was established.
Such recreational activities include, but
are not limited to: sightseeing, nature
observations and photography, sport
hunting, sport fishing, boating, camping,
hiking, picnicking, and other related
activities (50 CFR 36.31(a)). The
National Wildlife Refuge
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd-668ee), as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997, defines
‘‘wildlife-dependent recreation’’ and
‘‘wildlife-dependent recreational use’’
as ‘‘hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation and photography, or
environmental education and
interpretation’’ (16 U.S.C. 668ee(2)). We
encourage these uses, and they will
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57243
receive emphasis in management of the
public use of the refuge.
Key Provisions of the Conservation
Easement
The Conservation Easement was
established in 2002 for 10 years with an
option to renew it for another 10 years.
Koniag agrees to confine use of
Conservation Easement lands to fish and
wildlife management and conservation
activities, subsistence gathering
activities, archaeological investigations,
and recreational activities. We agree to
establish, maintain, and enforce a
permit system that imposes specific
limits on the level and location of
public recreational use on lands within
a 1⁄2-mile band on either side of the
Karluk River and lands within 1⁄2 mile
of the shoreline of Karluk Lake. We are
required to conduct a study to establish
such limits. The study must consider
whether the impact of public use may
be reduced to satisfactory levels by
measures such as public education, and
we are required to consider these
measures prior to restricting public
access. However, while we are
conducting this study, we must
annually limit the number of
recreational visitors to the area during
the period June 10 through July 15
(limited-use period) to a maximum of 70
scheduled visitors on any day. The 70per-day limit applies to both visitors
obtaining permits from us (currently
limited to 28 people per day) and
visitors using the area as clients of
guides authorized by Koniag, Inc.
(currently limited to 42 people per day).
We began requiring permits for
visitors to the area in 2002, under the
authority of temporary restrictions
issued by the Refuge Manager. The
proposed regulation will replace these
temporary restrictions and allow us to
continue to implement the Conservation
Easement. We began the required study
in 2002 and anticipate completing it in
2005. In the interim, parties of up to six
people may apply together for permits
issued by the refuge; permits are issued
for each member of the party. Each
individual may obtain only one
nontransferable permit for a visit of up
to 7 consecutive days during a calendar
year. Parties will apply by a deadline
established by the refuge and, will be
selected by lottery if there are more
visitors than scheduled visits available.
Remaining available scheduled visits
will be allocated on a first come, firstserved basis. To date, we have not had
visitor use reach the limit of 70 people
per day during the limited-use period.
During the remainder of the year, July
16 through June 9, there are no limits on
the number of permits available; visitors
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
57244
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Proposed Rules
apply for permits individually and
permits are issued to individuals.
In summary, the Conservation
Easement allows the Service to open
and manage public use of private lands.
It also requires the Service to establish
a permit system for some of these lands.
The purpose of the proposed regulation
is to provide the authority for the
Service to require visitors to obtain
permits to visit easement lands along
the Karluk River and Karluk Lake.
Plain Language Mandate
In this rule we use ‘‘you’’ to refer to
the reader and ‘‘we’’ to refer to the
Service, using the word ‘‘allow’’ instead
of ‘‘permit’’ when we do not require the
use of a permit for an activity, and using
active voice. Where the word ‘‘permit’’
occurs, a permit is required.
Statutory Authority
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act (Administration
Act) of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd–668ee, as
amended) and the Refuge Recreation
Act (Recreation Act) of 1962 (16 U.S.C.
460k–460k–4) govern the administration
and public use of refuges.
The Recreation Act authorizes the
Secretary to administer areas within the
Refuge System for public recreation as
an appropriate incidental or secondary
use only to the extent that doing so is
practicable and not inconsistent with
the primary purpose(s) for which
Congress and the Service established the
areas. The Recreation Act requires that
any recreational use of refuge lands be
compatible with the primary purpose(s)
for which we established the refuge and
not inconsistent with other previously
authorized operations.
The Administration Act and
Recreation Act also authorize the
Secretary to issue regulations to carry
out the purposes of the Acts and
regulate uses.
Section 1302(a) of the Alaska National
Interest Lands Conservation Act (16
U.S.C. 3192(a)) and the National
Wildlife Refuge Administration Act as
amended by the Refuge Improvement
Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd)
authorized us to enter into the
Conservation Easement with Koniag,
Inc., and the State of Alaska.
Request for Comments
You may comment on this proposed
rule by any one of several methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions at that site for submitting
comments.
2. You may mail comments to Abbey
Kucera, Kodiak National Wildlife
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:30 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
Refuge, 1390 Buskin River Road,
Kodiak, AK 99615.
3. You may comment via the Internet
to Abbey_Kucera@fws.gov. Please
submit Internet comments as an ASCII
file, avoiding the use of special
characters and any form of encryption.
Please also include: ‘‘Attn: 1018–AU08’’
and your full name and return mailing
address in your Internet message. If you
only use your e-mail address, we will
consider your comment to be
anonymous and will not consider it in
the final rule. If you do not receive a
confirmation from us that we have
received your Internet message, contact
us directly at (907) 487–2600 or toll-free
at (888) 408–3514.
4. You may fax comments to Abbey
Kucera, Kodiak National Wildlife
Refuge, at 907–487–2144.
5. Finally, you may hand-deliver or
courier comments to the address given
above.
We seek comments on this proposed
rule and will accept comments by any
of the methods described above. We
make comments, including the names
and home addresses of respondents,
available for public review during
regular business hours. Individual
respondents may request that we
withhold their home addresses from the
rulemaking record, which we will honor
to the extent allowable by law. In some
circumstances, we would withhold from
the rulemaking record a respondent’s
identity, as allowable by law. If you
wish us to withhold your name and/or
address, you must state this request
prominently at the beginning of your
comment. However, we will not
consider anonymous comments. We
will make all submissions from
organizations or businesses and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses available for
public inspection in their entirety.
Department of the Interior policy is,
whenever practicable, to afford the
public a meaningful opportunity to
participate in the rulemaking process.
We considered providing a 60-day,
rather than a 30-day, comment period.
However, we determined that an
additional 30-day delay in processing
this refuge-specific regulation would
jeopardize visitors’ ability to obtain
permits in a timely fashion. Since many
people who visit the area are from
outside Alaska, allowing people to
obtain permits earlier allows time for
these visitors to make travel
arrangements. The proposed rule is an
extension of practices successfully
implemented by refuge staff for the last
2 years as a trial period under a
temporary restriction. We must
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
administer the public use program on
the Karluk drainage using permits or we
will violate the Conservation Easement.
Without the permit system in place,
general public use of these private lands
would not be allowed.
When finalized, we will incorporate
this regulation into 50 CFR 36.39(j). Part
36 contains general provisions for use
and management of all Alaska National
Wildlife Refuges and supplements the
general National Wildlife Refuge System
regulations found in title 50 CFR
Chapter I, subpart C.
Clarity of This Regulation
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 requires
each agency to write regulations that are
easy to understand. We invite your
comments on how to make this rule
easier to understand, including answers
to questions such as the following: (1)
Are the requirements in the rule clearly
stated? (2) Does the rule contain
technical language or jargon that
interferes with its clarity? (3) Does the
format of the rule (grouping and order
of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce its
clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to
understand if it were divided into more
(but shorter) sections? (5) Is the
description of the rule in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
the preamble helpful in understanding
the rule? (6) What else could we do to
make the rule easier to understand?
Send a copy of any comments on how
we could make this proposed rule easier
to understand to: Office of Regulatory
Affairs, Department of the Interior,
Room 7229, 1849 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20240. You may e-mail
your comments to Execsec@ios.doi.gov.
Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Order 12866
In accordance with the criteria in E.O.
12866, the Service asserts that this rule
is not a significant regulatory action.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) makes the final determination
under E.O. 12866.
a. This rule would not have an annual
economic effect of $100 million or
adversely affect an economic sector,
productivity, jobs, the environment, or
other units of government. A brief
assessment to clarify the costs and
benefits associated with this rule
follows.
This rule would require a permit for
recreational activities on Conservation
Easement land, which is owned by
Koniag, Inc., and is within the
boundaries of Kodiak National Wildlife
Refuge in Alaska. The easement land is
within 1⁄2 mile of the Karluk River and
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Karluk Lake shoreline. To access the
area, visitors must: (1) Have a permit
from the refuge; (2) be a concessionaire
or a client of a concessionaire
authorized by Koniag, Inc.; or (3) be an
authorized subsistence user. The
baseline (status quo) is defined as the
conditions before the temporary
restriction was adopted. Therefore, all
permits associated with the
Conservation Easement land are new.
Visitation to the easement land
consists primarily of anglers because of
the world class king salmon fishing on
the Karluk River. In addition to angling,
other activities may include hiking,
camping, hunting, and watching
wildlife such as Kodiak brown bears.
During the limited use period from
June 10 to July 15, the maximum
number of recreational visitors that can
access the area is limited to 70 people
per day (28 holding refuge permits and
42 clients of guides holding Koniag,
Inc., permits). Outside of this limited
use time period (July 16 to June 9), there
is no limit to the number of visitors. In
all of 2004, 339 visitors were guided
with permits from Koniag, Inc., and 240
visitors were unguided with permits
from Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge.
Approximately 110 refuge permits were
for the limited use period and 130
refuge permits were for outside of the
limited use period. Thus, 579 people
visited the Karluk River and Lake
Conservation Easement land for
recreation in 2004.
Throughout the temporary restriction,
official monitoring of visitation has
shown that no applicants have been
denied access to the Conservation
Easement land. Therefore, we do not
expect that the permit requirement will
have an effect on the number of users
on the easement land.
Costs Incurred
There are no monetary fees for any of
these permits. Costs incurred are due to
the time to fill out the application and
time required to process the permit
application. Applicants need about 15
minutes to apply for a permit and fax or
mail it to the refuge. Approximately 15
minutes are needed for the refuge to
process an application. The majority of
applications are electronically produced
and faxed to the refuge. The average
annual time commitment for visitors is
approximately 60 hours (15 minutes x
240 applications). The average annual
time commitment for the refuge is about
60 hours (15 minutes x 240 permits).
Benefits Accrued
This rulemaking would allow the
public to continue to use the lands
along Karluk River and Karluk Lake. It
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:30 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
would provide an official system to
gather the information necessary to
track visitor use and help ensure visitor
safety. The proposed rulemaking would
also better distribute the number of
visitors throughout the peak season in
the future if use increased. While the
number of visitors is not expected to
change in the immediate future, if use
does increase in the future, visitors
could continue to experience conditions
similar to those today along Karluk
River and Lake. The permit system
would allow the refuge to distribute the
number of visitors throughout the peak
season thus avoiding fishing congestion.
b. This proposed rule would not
create inconsistencies with other
Federal agencies’ actions. This action
pertains solely to the management of
Conservation Easement lands within
Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge.
c. This proposed rule would not
materially affect entitlements, grants,
user fees, loan programs, or the rights
and obligations of their recipients. This
proposed rule does not affect
entitlement programs. There are no
grants or other Federal assistance
programs associated with public use of
the Conservation Easement.
d. This proposed rule would not raise
novel legal or policy issues. This
proposed rule requires a permit to
access the Koniag Conservation
Easement land. This proposed rule
continues the practice of allowing
recreational public use of many lands
managed by national wildlife refuges.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
[as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (SBREFA)], whenever a Federal
agency is required to publish a notice of
rulemaking for any proposed or final
rule, it must prepare and make available
for public comment a regulatory
flexibility analysis that describes the
effect of the rule on small entities (i.e.,
small businesses, small organizations,
and small government jurisdictions) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). However, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is required
if the head of an agency certifies that the
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Thus, for a
regulatory flexibility analysis to be
required, impacts must exceed a
threshold for ‘‘significant impact’’ and a
threshold for a ‘‘substantial number of
small entities.’’ See 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
SBREFA amended the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to require Federal
agencies to provide a statement of the
factual basis for certifying that a rule
would not have a significant economic
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57245
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Small businesses that may be affected
would include those located in Kodiak
Island Borough, Alaska. Because this
proposed rule is not expected to affect
recreational activities in the area, this
rule would not have a significant effect
on small businesses engaged in
activities in the borough. Therefore, we
certify that this rule would not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities as
defined under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. An initial/final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis is not required.
Accordingly, a Small Entity Compliance
Guide is not required.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
reduces regulatory obligations as
discussed in Executive Order 12866
above; therefore, based on the
information included in the Appendix,
this rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more;
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501, et
seq.), this rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act is not required.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with E.O. 12630, the
rule does not have any takings
implications. This regulation will affect
only conservation easement lands
owned by a willing participant, Koniag,
Inc., by allowing public use of private
lands.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
This rule has no Federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism Assessment under E.O.
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
57246
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Proposed Rules
13132. Permit holders who choose to
fish are regulated by Alaska Department
of Fish and Game regulations. Guides
and their clients must be authorized by
Koniag, Inc. In negotiating the
Conservation Easement, we coordinated
with State and Tribal governments, and
the State of Alaska is a party to the
Conservation Easement.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the
Office of the Solicitor has determined
that the rule does not unduly burden the
judicial system and that it meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order. A violation of the rule is
classified as a misdemeanor offense.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
(E.O. 13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
E.O. 13211 on regulations that
significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, and use. E.O. 13211
requires agencies to prepare Statements
of Energy Effects when undertaking
certain actions. The proposed rule has
no effect on energy supplies,
distribution, and use. Therefore, this
action is a not a significant energy
action and no Statement of Energy
Effects is required.
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments (E.O. 13175)
Endangered Species Act Section 7
Consultation
No species listed as endangered under
the Endangered Species Act is known to
occur within the easement lands. In
2004, a Section 7 consultation under the
Endangered Species Act was conducted
for the Draft Revised Comprehensive
Conservation Plan, Kodiak National
Wildlife Refuge. This plan includes the
proposed management of Conservation
Easement lands. The plan was found to
be fully consistent with Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act by the Service
and the National Marine Fisheries
Service.
National Environmental Policy Act
We analyzed this rule in accordance
with the criteria of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4332(C)) (NEPA) and 516 DM 6,
Appendix 1. This rule does not
constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment. An environmental
impact statement/assessment is not
required. A categorical exclusion from
NEPA documentation applies under the
Department of the Interior Manual, 516
DM 8 B(10).
Primary Author
Abbey Kucera, Supervisory Natural
Resources Specialist, Kodiak National
Wildlife Refuge, is the primary author of
this rulemaking document.
In accordance with E.O. 13175, we
have evaluated possible effects on
federally recognized Indian tribes and
have determined there are no effects.
Koniag consulted with area Tribal
governments in drafting the
Conservation Easement. Other
provisions of the Conservation
Easement provide for preference for
certain services be given to Koniag
shareholders who reside in Larsen Bay
or Karluk and to the tribal governments
of Larsen Bay and Karluk.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 36
Paperwork Reduction Act
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 460(k)
et seq., 668dd–668ee, as amended, 742(a) et
seq., 3101 et seq., and 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
This regulation does not contain any
information collection requirements
other than those already approved by
the OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
(OMB Control Number is 1018–0014).
See 50 CFR 36.3 for information
concerning that approval. We will
amend our information collection to
include the burden hours associated
with this regulation. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:30 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
Alaska, Recreation and recreation
areas, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Wildlife refuges.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, we propose to amend title 50,
part 36, subpart E of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 36—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 36
continues to read as follows:
2. Amend § 36.39 by adding
paragraph (j)(3) to read as follows:
§ 36.39
Public use.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Permit requirement for
Conservation Easement lands. (i)
Pursuant to the terms of a Conservation
Easement held by the United States and
the State of Alaska, we manage public
use of certain lands owned by Koniag,
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Inc. These lands are inholdings within
the exterior boundaries of the Kodiak
National Wildlife Refuge. The
Conservation Easement was recorded in
the Kodiak Recording District, Alaska,
on December 6, 2002, as document
number 2002–003448–0. The lands
subject to the Conservation Easement to
which the permit requirements in this
subsection apply are all lands within 1⁄2
mile of the west shore of Karluk Lake,
from the lake outlet to the southern
boundary of T. 32 S., R. 30 W.
(surveyed), Seward Meridian; all lands
within 1⁄2 mile of the east shore of
Karluk Lake, from the lake outlet to a
point due east of the north end of Camp
Island; and all lands within a 1⁄2-mile
band of land on either side of the Karluk
River, from the Karluk Lake outlet
downstream to the refuge boundary.
You are prohibited from using these
lands unless you have a
nontransferrable permit from the refuge,
are a concessionaire or a client of a
concessionaire authorized by Koniag,
Inc., to provide revenue-producing
visitor services, or you are an authorized
user in accordance with section 7(d) of
the Conservation Easement. A map is
available from the refuge showing the
location of the easement lands which
are subject to the permit requirement.
(ii) Interim requirements. The
Conservation Easement requires us to
conduct a study to determine the level
of use and how the permit system will
work. The following permit procedures
and limits apply only until the study is
completed, or management of the
Conservation Easement is changed by
agreement of the three parties (Koniag,
Inc., State of Alaska, and Kodiak
National Wildlife Refuge). For the
period June 10 to July 15 the following
conditions apply:
(A) The maximum number of visitors
scheduled on one day is limited to 70.
Should weather preclude a scheduled
visitor from arriving or leaving as
planned, more than 70 visitors may be
on site at the same time.
(B) The 70 visitors are allocated 28
nonguided (permits issued by the
refuge) and 42 guided (under permits
issued by Koniag, Inc.).
(C) Parties of up to six people may
apply together for permits issued by the
refuge; permits are issued for each
member of the party.
(D) Each individual may obtain only
one nontransferable permit for a visit of
up to 7 consecutive days during a
calendar year. Parties will apply by a
deadline established by the refuge and
will be selected by lottery if there are
more visitors than scheduled visits
available. Remaining available
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Proposed Rules
scheduled visits will be allocated on a
first come, first-served basis.
(E) During the remainder of the year,
July 16 through June 9, there are no
limits on the number of permits
available; visitors apply for permits
individually and permits are issued to
individuals.
Dated: September 7, 2005.
Craig Manson,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. 05–19570 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:30 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57247
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57242-57247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19570]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 36
RIN 1018-AU08
Refuge-Specific Public Use Regulations for Kodiak National
Wildlife Refuge
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) proposes to open
private lands within the boundaries of Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge
in Alaska to public use, with a permit, complying with our commitments
made under a Conservation Easement among the United States, the State
of Alaska, and Koniag, Inc. The Conservation Easement furthers the
missions of the Service and the National Wildlife Refuge System and the
purposes of Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge. The easement lands
[[Page 57243]]
affected by this rule are along Karluk River and Karluk Lake on Kodiak
Island, Alaska. The rule will apply as long as the easement is in
place. Without this rule, the Service would fail to comply with the
terms of the Conservation Easement.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before October 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to Abbey Kucera, Kodiak National
Wildlife Refuge, 1390 Buskin River Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615. See
Request for Public Comments section of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
information on electronic submission.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Abbey Kucera (907) 487-2600; Fax (907)
487-2144.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge was
established in 1941 by Executive Order for the purpose of protecting
the natural feeding and breeding ranges of brown bears and other
wildlife on Uganik and Kodiak Islands. The lands now under the
Conservation Easement were once refuge lands. The Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act of 1971 (43 U.S.C. 1601-1624) (Act) allowed refuge lands
to be conveyed to Alaska Native Corporations established under the Act,
including the lands now covered by this Conservation Easement. In 2002,
the Conservation Easement was signed, calling for these lands to be
managed similarly to refuge lands and requiring refuge-issued permits
for most public recreational use of the Karluk River and Karluk Lake
lands.
Background About Kodiak Refuge
The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 3101
et seq., 43 U.S.C. 1602) expanded the purposes for which Kodiak
National Wildlife Refuge was established to include: (i) To conserve
fish and wildlife populations [and] habitats in their natural diversity
including, but not limited to, Kodiak brown bears, salmonids, sea
otters, sea lions and other marine mammals and migratory birds; (ii) to
fulfill the international treaty obligations of the United States with
respect to fish and wildlife and other habitats; (iii) to provide, in a
manner consistent with the purposes set forth in subparagraphs (i) and
(ii), the opportunity for continued subsistence uses by local
residents; and (iv) to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable and in
a manner consistent with the purposes set forth in paragraph (i), water
quality and necessary water quantity within the refuge.
Kodiak Refuge encompasses almost two million acres in southwestern
Alaska, including about two-thirds of Kodiak Island. The city of
Kodiak, where refuge headquarters are located, is about 250 air miles
south of Anchorage, about 20 miles northeast of the refuge boundary on
Kodiak Island, and about 60 air miles northeast of Karluk Lake.
Kodiak Refuge is characterized by a large range of habitats within
a relatively small geographic area. Because of this, the refuge
supports some of the highest densities of brown bears, nesting bald
eagles, and spawning salmon found anywhere in North America. The
mountainous interior of Kodiak Island, with several peaks over 4,000
feet in elevation, is covered by lush, dense vegetation during the
summer, with alpine vegetation on the highest slopes. No place on the
refuge is more than 15 miles from the ocean. Access to the refuge is
primarily by float plane and boat. Karluk River and Karluk Lake have
runs of all five species of Pacific Salmon (chinook, sockeye, coho,
pink, and chum) and steelhead. Rainbow trout, Dolly Varden, and Arctic
char are also found there.
Kodiak Refuge was established primarily to protect the brown bear.
With an estimated population of 2,100 bears, the refuge contains some
of the best brown bear habitat in the world supporting some of the
highest concentrations of brown bear found anywhere in the world. These
bears feed on spawning salmon and forage throughout most of the refuge.
The Karluk River drainage is one of the most important fisheries to
bears, with up to 200 bears using the Karluk area from mid-June to the
end of September.
Under our regulations implementing the Alaska National Interest
Lands Conservation Act (50 CFR 36.31), all refuge lands in Alaska are
open to public recreational activities as long as such activities are
conducted in a manner compatible with the purposes for which the refuge
was established. Such recreational activities include, but are not
limited to: sightseeing, nature observations and photography, sport
hunting, sport fishing, boating, camping, hiking, picnicking, and other
related activities (50 CFR 36.31(a)). The National Wildlife Refuge
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, defines
``wildlife-dependent recreation'' and ``wildlife-dependent recreational
use'' as ``hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, or
environmental education and interpretation'' (16 U.S.C. 668ee(2)). We
encourage these uses, and they will receive emphasis in management of
the public use of the refuge.
Key Provisions of the Conservation Easement
The Conservation Easement was established in 2002 for 10 years with
an option to renew it for another 10 years. Koniag agrees to confine
use of Conservation Easement lands to fish and wildlife management and
conservation activities, subsistence gathering activities,
archaeological investigations, and recreational activities. We agree to
establish, maintain, and enforce a permit system that imposes specific
limits on the level and location of public recreational use on lands
within a \1/2\-mile band on either side of the Karluk River and lands
within \1/2\ mile of the shoreline of Karluk Lake. We are required to
conduct a study to establish such limits. The study must consider
whether the impact of public use may be reduced to satisfactory levels
by measures such as public education, and we are required to consider
these measures prior to restricting public access. However, while we
are conducting this study, we must annually limit the number of
recreational visitors to the area during the period June 10 through
July 15 (limited-use period) to a maximum of 70 scheduled visitors on
any day. The 70-per-day limit applies to both visitors obtaining
permits from us (currently limited to 28 people per day) and visitors
using the area as clients of guides authorized by Koniag, Inc.
(currently limited to 42 people per day).
We began requiring permits for visitors to the area in 2002, under
the authority of temporary restrictions issued by the Refuge Manager.
The proposed regulation will replace these temporary restrictions and
allow us to continue to implement the Conservation Easement. We began
the required study in 2002 and anticipate completing it in 2005. In the
interim, parties of up to six people may apply together for permits
issued by the refuge; permits are issued for each member of the party.
Each individual may obtain only one nontransferable permit for a visit
of up to 7 consecutive days during a calendar year. Parties will apply
by a deadline established by the refuge and, will be selected by
lottery if there are more visitors than scheduled visits available.
Remaining available scheduled visits will be allocated on a first come,
first-served basis. To date, we have not had visitor use reach the
limit of 70 people per day during the limited-use period. During the
remainder of the year, July 16 through June 9, there are no limits on
the number of permits available; visitors
[[Page 57244]]
apply for permits individually and permits are issued to individuals.
In summary, the Conservation Easement allows the Service to open
and manage public use of private lands. It also requires the Service to
establish a permit system for some of these lands. The purpose of the
proposed regulation is to provide the authority for the Service to
require visitors to obtain permits to visit easement lands along the
Karluk River and Karluk Lake.
Plain Language Mandate
In this rule we use ``you'' to refer to the reader and ``we'' to
refer to the Service, using the word ``allow'' instead of ``permit''
when we do not require the use of a permit for an activity, and using
active voice. Where the word ``permit'' occurs, a permit is required.
Statutory Authority
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act
(Administration Act) of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee, as amended) and
the Refuge Recreation Act (Recreation Act) of 1962 (16 U.S.C. 460k-
460k-4) govern the administration and public use of refuges.
The Recreation Act authorizes the Secretary to administer areas
within the Refuge System for public recreation as an appropriate
incidental or secondary use only to the extent that doing so is
practicable and not inconsistent with the primary purpose(s) for which
Congress and the Service established the areas. The Recreation Act
requires that any recreational use of refuge lands be compatible with
the primary purpose(s) for which we established the refuge and not
inconsistent with other previously authorized operations.
The Administration Act and Recreation Act also authorize the
Secretary to issue regulations to carry out the purposes of the Acts
and regulate uses.
Section 1302(a) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (16 U.S.C. 3192(a)) and the National Wildlife Refuge Administration
Act as amended by the Refuge Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd)
authorized us to enter into the Conservation Easement with Koniag,
Inc., and the State of Alaska.
Request for Comments
You may comment on this proposed rule by any one of several
methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions at that site for submitting comments.
2. You may mail comments to Abbey Kucera, Kodiak National Wildlife
Refuge, 1390 Buskin River Road, Kodiak, AK 99615.
3. You may comment via the Internet to Abbey--Kucera@fws.gov.
Please submit Internet comments as an ASCII file, avoiding the use of
special characters and any form of encryption. Please also include:
``Attn: 1018-AU08'' and your full name and return mailing address in
your Internet message. If you only use your e-mail address, we will
consider your comment to be anonymous and will not consider it in the
final rule. If you do not receive a confirmation from us that we have
received your Internet message, contact us directly at (907) 487-2600
or toll-free at (888) 408-3514.
4. You may fax comments to Abbey Kucera, Kodiak National Wildlife
Refuge, at 907-487-2144.
5. Finally, you may hand-deliver or courier comments to the address
given above.
We seek comments on this proposed rule and will accept comments by
any of the methods described above. We make comments, including the
names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review
during regular business hours. Individual respondents may request that
we withhold their home addresses from the rulemaking record, which we
will honor to the extent allowable by law. In some circumstances, we
would withhold from the rulemaking record a respondent's identity, as
allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address,
you must state this request prominently at the beginning of your
comment. However, we will not consider anonymous comments. We will make
all submissions from organizations or businesses and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses available for public inspection in their entirety.
Department of the Interior policy is, whenever practicable, to
afford the public a meaningful opportunity to participate in the
rulemaking process. We considered providing a 60-day, rather than a 30-
day, comment period. However, we determined that an additional 30-day
delay in processing this refuge-specific regulation would jeopardize
visitors' ability to obtain permits in a timely fashion. Since many
people who visit the area are from outside Alaska, allowing people to
obtain permits earlier allows time for these visitors to make travel
arrangements. The proposed rule is an extension of practices
successfully implemented by refuge staff for the last 2 years as a
trial period under a temporary restriction. We must administer the
public use program on the Karluk drainage using permits or we will
violate the Conservation Easement. Without the permit system in place,
general public use of these private lands would not be allowed.
When finalized, we will incorporate this regulation into 50 CFR
36.39(j). Part 36 contains general provisions for use and management of
all Alaska National Wildlife Refuges and supplements the general
National Wildlife Refuge System regulations found in title 50 CFR
Chapter I, subpart C.
Clarity of This Regulation
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 requires each agency to write
regulations that are easy to understand. We invite your comments on how
to make this rule easier to understand, including answers to questions
such as the following: (1) Are the requirements in the rule clearly
stated? (2) Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that
interferes with its clarity? (3) Does the format of the rule (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or
reduce its clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to understand if it
were divided into more (but shorter) sections? (5) Is the description
of the rule in the Supplementary Information section of the preamble
helpful in understanding the rule? (6) What else could we do to make
the rule easier to understand? Send a copy of any comments on how we
could make this proposed rule easier to understand to: Office of
Regulatory Affairs, Department of the Interior, Room 7229, 1849 C
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240. You may e-mail your comments to
Execsec@ios.doi.gov.
Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Order 12866
In accordance with the criteria in E.O. 12866, the Service asserts
that this rule is not a significant regulatory action. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) makes the final determination under E.O.
12866.
a. This rule would not have an annual economic effect of $100
million or adversely affect an economic sector, productivity, jobs, the
environment, or other units of government. A brief assessment to
clarify the costs and benefits associated with this rule follows.
This rule would require a permit for recreational activities on
Conservation Easement land, which is owned by Koniag, Inc., and is
within the boundaries of Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. The
easement land is within \1/2\ mile of the Karluk River and
[[Page 57245]]
Karluk Lake shoreline. To access the area, visitors must: (1) Have a
permit from the refuge; (2) be a concessionaire or a client of a
concessionaire authorized by Koniag, Inc.; or (3) be an authorized
subsistence user. The baseline (status quo) is defined as the
conditions before the temporary restriction was adopted. Therefore, all
permits associated with the Conservation Easement land are new.
Visitation to the easement land consists primarily of anglers
because of the world class king salmon fishing on the Karluk River. In
addition to angling, other activities may include hiking, camping,
hunting, and watching wildlife such as Kodiak brown bears.
During the limited use period from June 10 to July 15, the maximum
number of recreational visitors that can access the area is limited to
70 people per day (28 holding refuge permits and 42 clients of guides
holding Koniag, Inc., permits). Outside of this limited use time period
(July 16 to June 9), there is no limit to the number of visitors. In
all of 2004, 339 visitors were guided with permits from Koniag, Inc.,
and 240 visitors were unguided with permits from Kodiak National
Wildlife Refuge. Approximately 110 refuge permits were for the limited
use period and 130 refuge permits were for outside of the limited use
period. Thus, 579 people visited the Karluk River and Lake Conservation
Easement land for recreation in 2004.
Throughout the temporary restriction, official monitoring of
visitation has shown that no applicants have been denied access to the
Conservation Easement land. Therefore, we do not expect that the permit
requirement will have an effect on the number of users on the easement
land.
Costs Incurred
There are no monetary fees for any of these permits. Costs incurred
are due to the time to fill out the application and time required to
process the permit application. Applicants need about 15 minutes to
apply for a permit and fax or mail it to the refuge. Approximately 15
minutes are needed for the refuge to process an application. The
majority of applications are electronically produced and faxed to the
refuge. The average annual time commitment for visitors is
approximately 60 hours (15 minutes x 240 applications). The average
annual time commitment for the refuge is about 60 hours (15 minutes x
240 permits).
Benefits Accrued
This rulemaking would allow the public to continue to use the lands
along Karluk River and Karluk Lake. It would provide an official system
to gather the information necessary to track visitor use and help
ensure visitor safety. The proposed rulemaking would also better
distribute the number of visitors throughout the peak season in the
future if use increased. While the number of visitors is not expected
to change in the immediate future, if use does increase in the future,
visitors could continue to experience conditions similar to those today
along Karluk River and Lake. The permit system would allow the refuge
to distribute the number of visitors throughout the peak season thus
avoiding fishing congestion.
b. This proposed rule would not create inconsistencies with other
Federal agencies' actions. This action pertains solely to the
management of Conservation Easement lands within Kodiak National
Wildlife Refuge.
c. This proposed rule would not materially affect entitlements,
grants, user fees, loan programs, or the rights and obligations of
their recipients. This proposed rule does not affect entitlement
programs. There are no grants or other Federal assistance programs
associated with public use of the Conservation Easement.
d. This proposed rule would not raise novel legal or policy issues.
This proposed rule requires a permit to access the Koniag Conservation
Easement land. This proposed rule continues the practice of allowing
recreational public use of many lands managed by national wildlife
refuges.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act [as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA)],
whenever a Federal agency is required to publish a notice of rulemaking
for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make available for
public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the
effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small
organizations, and small government jurisdictions) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.). However, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required if the
head of an agency certifies that the rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Thus, for a
regulatory flexibility analysis to be required, impacts must exceed a
threshold for ``significant impact'' and a threshold for a
``substantial number of small entities.'' See 5 U.S.C. 605(b). SBREFA
amended the Regulatory Flexibility Act to require Federal agencies to
provide a statement of the factual basis for certifying that a rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
Small businesses that may be affected would include those located
in Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska. Because this proposed rule is not
expected to affect recreational activities in the area, this rule would
not have a significant effect on small businesses engaged in activities
in the borough. Therefore, we certify that this rule would not have a
significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities
as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. An initial/final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required. Accordingly, a Small
Entity Compliance Guide is not required.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule reduces regulatory
obligations as discussed in Executive Order 12866 above; therefore,
based on the information included in the Appendix, this rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more;
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; and
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501,
et seq.), this rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100
million per year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect
on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act is not required.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with E.O. 12630, the rule does not have any takings
implications. This regulation will affect only conservation easement
lands owned by a willing participant, Koniag, Inc., by allowing public
use of private lands.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
This rule has no Federalism implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism Assessment under E.O.
[[Page 57246]]
13132. Permit holders who choose to fish are regulated by Alaska
Department of Fish and Game regulations. Guides and their clients must
be authorized by Koniag, Inc. In negotiating the Conservation Easement,
we coordinated with State and Tribal governments, and the State of
Alaska is a party to the Conservation Easement.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that the rule does not unduly burden the judicial system and
that it meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the
Order. A violation of the rule is classified as a misdemeanor offense.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (E.O. 13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued E.O. 13211 on regulations
that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, and use. E.O.
13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of Energy Effects when
undertaking certain actions. The proposed rule has no effect on energy
supplies, distribution, and use. Therefore, this action is a not a
significant energy action and no Statement of Energy Effects is
required.
Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments (E.O.
13175)
In accordance with E.O. 13175, we have evaluated possible effects
on federally recognized Indian tribes and have determined there are no
effects. Koniag consulted with area Tribal governments in drafting the
Conservation Easement. Other provisions of the Conservation Easement
provide for preference for certain services be given to Koniag
shareholders who reside in Larsen Bay or Karluk and to the tribal
governments of Larsen Bay and Karluk.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulation does not contain any information collection
requirements other than those already approved by the OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (OMB Control Number is
1018-0014). See 50 CFR 36.3 for information concerning that approval.
We will amend our information collection to include the burden hours
associated with this regulation. An agency may not conduct or sponsor
and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation
No species listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act is
known to occur within the easement lands. In 2004, a Section 7
consultation under the Endangered Species Act was conducted for the
Draft Revised Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Kodiak National Wildlife
Refuge. This plan includes the proposed management of Conservation
Easement lands. The plan was found to be fully consistent with Section
7 of the Endangered Species Act by the Service and the National Marine
Fisheries Service.
National Environmental Policy Act
We analyzed this rule in accordance with the criteria of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(C)) (NEPA)
and 516 DM 6, Appendix 1. This rule does not constitute a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. An
environmental impact statement/assessment is not required. A
categorical exclusion from NEPA documentation applies under the
Department of the Interior Manual, 516 DM 8 B(10).
Primary Author
Abbey Kucera, Supervisory Natural Resources Specialist, Kodiak
National Wildlife Refuge, is the primary author of this rulemaking
document.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 36
Alaska, Recreation and recreation areas, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife refuges.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, we propose to amend
title 50, part 36, subpart E of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 36--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 36 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 460(k) et seq., 668dd-668ee,
as amended, 742(a) et seq., 3101 et seq., and 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
2. Amend Sec. 36.39 by adding paragraph (j)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 36.39 Public use.
* * * * *
(j) Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge. * * *
* * * * *
(3) Permit requirement for Conservation Easement lands. (i)
Pursuant to the terms of a Conservation Easement held by the United
States and the State of Alaska, we manage public use of certain lands
owned by Koniag, Inc. These lands are inholdings within the exterior
boundaries of the Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge. The Conservation
Easement was recorded in the Kodiak Recording District, Alaska, on
December 6, 2002, as document number 2002-003448-0. The lands subject
to the Conservation Easement to which the permit requirements in this
subsection apply are all lands within \1/2\ mile of the west shore of
Karluk Lake, from the lake outlet to the southern boundary of T. 32 S.,
R. 30 W. (surveyed), Seward Meridian; all lands within \1/2\ mile of
the east shore of Karluk Lake, from the lake outlet to a point due east
of the north end of Camp Island; and all lands within a \1/2\-mile band
of land on either side of the Karluk River, from the Karluk Lake outlet
downstream to the refuge boundary. You are prohibited from using these
lands unless you have a nontransferrable permit from the refuge, are a
concessionaire or a client of a concessionaire authorized by Koniag,
Inc., to provide revenue-producing visitor services, or you are an
authorized user in accordance with section 7(d) of the Conservation
Easement. A map is available from the refuge showing the location of
the easement lands which are subject to the permit requirement.
(ii) Interim requirements. The Conservation Easement requires us to
conduct a study to determine the level of use and how the permit system
will work. The following permit procedures and limits apply only until
the study is completed, or management of the Conservation Easement is
changed by agreement of the three parties (Koniag, Inc., State of
Alaska, and Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge). For the period June 10 to
July 15 the following conditions apply:
(A) The maximum number of visitors scheduled on one day is limited
to 70. Should weather preclude a scheduled visitor from arriving or
leaving as planned, more than 70 visitors may be on site at the same
time.
(B) The 70 visitors are allocated 28 nonguided (permits issued by
the refuge) and 42 guided (under permits issued by Koniag, Inc.).
(C) Parties of up to six people may apply together for permits
issued by the refuge; permits are issued for each member of the party.
(D) Each individual may obtain only one nontransferable permit for
a visit of up to 7 consecutive days during a calendar year. Parties
will apply by a deadline established by the refuge and will be selected
by lottery if there are more visitors than scheduled visits available.
Remaining available
[[Page 57247]]
scheduled visits will be allocated on a first come, first-served basis.
(E) During the remainder of the year, July 16 through June 9, there
are no limits on the number of permits available; visitors apply for
permits individually and permits are issued to individuals.
Dated: September 7, 2005.
Craig Manson,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 05-19570 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P