Airworthiness Directives; BAe Systems (Operations) Limited Model ATP Airplanes, 57126-57127 [05-19554]
Download as PDF
57126
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22406; Directorate
Identifier 2002–NM–242–AD; Amendment
39–14270; AD 2005–19–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Aerospatiale
Model ATR42–500 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a
typographical error in an existing
airworthiness directive (AD) that was
published in the Federal Register on
September 14, 2005 (70 FR 54249). The
error resulted in an incorrect Docket No.
This AD applies to certain Aerospatiale
Model ATR42–500 airplanes. This AD
requires inspecting for correct
installation of the fastener that attaches
the ground braids on the elevator,
modifying the forward bonded assembly
of the elevator control rod, and
corrective action if necessary.
DATES: Effective September 29, 2005.
ADDRESSES: The AD docket contains the
proposed AD, comments, and any final
disposition. You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management Facility office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building at
the U.S. Department of Transportation,
400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL–401,
Washington, DC. This docket number is
FAA–2005–22406; the directorate
identifier for this docket is 2002–NM–
242–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055–4056; telephone
(425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 6, 2005, the FAA issued AD
2005–19–05, amendment 39–14270 (70
FR 54249, September 14, 2005), for
certain Aerospatiale Model ATR42–500
airplanes. This AD requires inspecting
for correct installation of the fastener
that attaches the ground braids on the
elevator, modifying the forward bonded
assembly of the elevator control rod,
and corrective action if necessary.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
As published, that AD specifies an
incorrect Docket No. (i.e., FAA–2005–
20406) throughout preamble and the
regulatory text of the AD. The correct
Docket No. is FAA–2005–22406.
No other part of the regulatory
information has been changed;
therefore, the final rule is not
republished in the Federal Register.
The effective date of this AD remains
September 29, 2005.
§ 39.13
[Corrected]
I In the Federal Register of September
14, 2005, on page 54250, in the third
column, paragraph 2. of PART 39—
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES of AD
2005–19–05 is corrected to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
2005–19–05 Aerospatiale: Amendment 39–
14270. Docket No. FAA–2005–22406;
Directorate Identifier 2002–NM–242–AD.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 26, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–19555 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22404; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–018–AD; Amendment
39–14268; AD 2005–19–03]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BAe
Systems (Operations) Limited Model
ATP Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a
typographical error in an existing
airworthiness directive (AD) that was
published in the Federal Register on
September 13, 2005 (70 FR 53915). The
error resulted in an incorrect Docket No.
This AD applies to all BAe Systems
(Operations) Limited Model ATP
airplanes. This AD requires revising the
Airworthiness Limitations Section of
the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness to incorporate life limits
for certain items and new inspections to
detect fatigue cracking in certain
structures and of certain significant
structural items, and to revise life limits
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for certain equipment and various
components.
DATES: Effective September 28, 2005.
ADDRESSES: The AD docket contains the
proposed AD, comments, and any final
disposition. You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management Facility office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building at
the U.S. Department of Transportation,
400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL–401,
Washington, DC. This docket number is
FAA–2005–22404; the directorate
identifier for this docket is 2005–NM–
018–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–1175;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 6, 2005, the FAA issued AD
2005–19–03, amendment 39–14268 (70
FR 53915, September 13, 2005), for all
BAe Systems (Operations) Limited
Model ATP airplanes. The AD requires
revising the Airworthiness Limitations
Section of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness to incorporate
life limits for certain items and new
inspections to detect fatigue cracking in
certain structures and of certain
significant structural items, and to
revise life limits for certain equipment
and various components.
As published, that AD specifies an
incorrect Docket No. (i.e., FAA–2005–
20404) throughout preamble and the
regulatory text of the AD. The correct
Docket No. is FAA–2005–22404.
No other part of the regulatory
information has been changed;
therefore, the final rule is not
republished in the Federal Register.
The effective date of this AD remains
September 28, 2005.
§ 39.13
[Corrected]
I In the Federal Register of September
13, 2005, on page 53916, in the third
column, paragraph 2. of PART 39—
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES of AD
2005–19–03 is corrected to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
2005–19–03 BAe Systems (Operations)
Limited (Formerly British Aerospace
Regional Aircraft): Amendment 39–
14268. Docket No. FAA–2005–22404;
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–018–AD.
*
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
*
*
30SER1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 26, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–19554 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
15 CFR Part 922
National Marine Sanctuary Program
Policy on Permit Applications for
Artificial Reef Development
National Marine Sanctuary
Program (NMSP), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Policy statement; response to
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Marine
Sanctuary Program (NMSP) has
developed a final policy and permitting
guidelines for applications to establish
artificial reefs within National Marine
Sanctuaries. The NMSP is releasing its
final policy and permitting guidelines,
and responding to comments on the
interim final policy.
DATES: This notice is effective as a final
policy as of September 30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You can download a copy
of the final policy from the NMSP’s Web
site at https://sanctuaries.nos.noaa.gov/
library/library.html. You may also
request a copy of the NMSP’s final
policy on artificial reefs and submit
written comments on the policy by
contacting John Armor, National Marine
Sanctuary Program, 1305 East West
Highway (N/ORM6), 11th floor, Silver
Spring, MD 20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Armor at (301) 713–3125.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The National Marine Sanctuary
Program (NMSP) manages a system of
thirteen National Marine Sanctuaries
(NMSs or Sanctuaries) and the
Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Coral
Reef Ecosystem Reserve that protect
special, nationally significant areas of
the marine environment under the
authority of the National Marine
Sanctuaries Act (NMSA; 16 U.S.C. 1431
et seq.). Sanctuaries protect a variety of
marine areas including coral reefs,
mangrove forests, and seagrass beds in
the Florida Keys National Marine
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
Sanctuary; deep-sea canyons, kelp beds,
and hardbottom habitats in the
Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary; and historic shipwrecks in
the Thunder Bay National Marine
Sanctuary and Underwater Preserve.
In the last few years the NMSP has
experienced an increased number of
permit applications to establish artificial
reefs inside NMS boundaries,
particularly in the Florida Keys National
Marine Sanctuary. Because NMSP
regulations generally prohibit placing
structures on sanctuary submerged
lands, any individual who wishes to
establish an artificial reef inside a NMS
must first get approval from the NMSP
through the onsite sanctuary manager.
To ensure that applications to
establish artificial reefs in sanctuaries
are reviewed consistently and in a
manner that adheres to the NMSA and
NMSP regulations (15 CFR Part 922), the
NMSP developed permitting guidelines
specific for such applications. The
guidelines build on lessons learned
from past experience permitting
artificial reefs within sanctuaries and
apply knowledge from other sources of
information. They are intended to guide
decision makers as they review
proposals for artificial reefs in
sanctuaries. They clarify how decision
making criteria contained in NMSP
regulations will be applied specifically
to permit applications for artificial reef
development.
Response to Comments
On July 18, 2003, NOAA published a
notice of availability of the NMSP’s
Artificial Reef Policy and Permitting
Guidelines in the Federal Register (68
FR 42690, Jul. 18, 2003). The policy and
permitting guidelines have been
implemented on an interim-final basis
since that date. NOAA also requested
comments on the policy and permitting
guidelines through September 16, 2003.
The following are NOAA’s responses to
the comments received.
Comment 1. Many commenters felt
that the policy prohibited or was overly
restrictive of artificial reef development
within national marine sanctuaries.
Response: NOAA disagrees. The
NMSP’s regulations prohibit artificial
reef development in NMSs by
prohibiting the placement of structures
on the submerged lands. This policy
creates a framework to allow artificial
reefs under specific conditions (i.e.,
when a project is expected to benefit
NMS management and would not have
a detrimental effect on NMS resources).
The policy applies higher standards of
resource protection to artificial reef
projects within NMSs than would apply
to projects outside NMSs or other
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57127
protected areas. More protective
requirements are appropriate given the
nature and purpose of the NMSs.
Comment 2. Several commenters
suggested expanding the policy or
definition of artificial reefs to address
specific issues, such as coral reef
restoration and reef balls.
Response: The primary purpose of the
policy is to guide decision making
related to placement of artificial reefs
within the Sanctuary System. The
policy is intended to apply to all types
of artificial reef projects, and not to
direct the policy to a specific type of
artificial reef. The policy appropriately
and specifically excludes natural reef
restoration projects from application of
this policy because such projects are
addressed by the NMSP in a much
different manner.
Comment 3. A few commenters felt
that artificial reefs should not be placed
in sanctuaries under any circumstances.
Response: See response to comment
number 1.
Comment 4. A few commenters stated
that all or part of the policy conflicted
with the National Fishing Enhancement
Act of 1984 (NFEA).
Response: NOAA disagrees. While the
NFEA encourages artificial reef
development it does not, under any
circumstance, require their use. Any
regulatory or statutory requirement that
prohibits or imposes more restrictive
requirements on artificial reef
development is not in direct conflict
with that statute. The NMSP’s artificial
reef policy is written pursuant to the
NMSA and the regulations promulgated
thereunder. Because the primary
objective of the NMSA is resource
protection, it is entirely appropriate that
the NMSP’s policy be more protective
than the policy applicable to nonsanctuary waters under the NFEA.
Comment 5. Some commenters felt
that the NMSP’s policy imposes more
burdens on an applicant than the
requirements of the National Artificial
Reef Plan (NARP).
Response: NOAA agrees. The policy
does exceed the requirements of the
NARP in several respects including the
types of monitoring and insurance
required. As discussed in the response
to comment number 4, these more
stringent requirements are consistent
with the purposes and policies of the
NMSA and are appropriate for NMSs.
Comment 6. One commenter
suggested that the section on the
definition of an artificial reef should
refer to applying the policy to oil rigs
and existing structures that may end up
being used as artificial reefs in the
future.
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57126-57127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19554]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-22404; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-018-AD;
Amendment 39-14268; AD 2005-19-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BAe Systems (Operations) Limited Model
ATP Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a typographical error in an existing
airworthiness directive (AD) that was published in the Federal Register
on September 13, 2005 (70 FR 53915). The error resulted in an incorrect
Docket No. This AD applies to all BAe Systems (Operations) Limited
Model ATP airplanes. This AD requires revising the Airworthiness
Limitations Section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to
incorporate life limits for certain items and new inspections to detect
fatigue cracking in certain structures and of certain significant
structural items, and to revise life limits for certain equipment and
various components.
DATES: Effective September 28, 2005.
ADDRESSES: The AD docket contains the proposed AD, comments, and any
final disposition. You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-401,
Washington, DC. This docket number is FAA-2005-22404; the directorate
identifier for this docket is 2005-NM-018-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-1175; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 6, 2005, the FAA issued AD
2005-19-03, amendment 39-14268 (70 FR 53915, September 13, 2005), for
all BAe Systems (Operations) Limited Model ATP airplanes. The AD
requires revising the Airworthiness Limitations Section of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to incorporate life limits for
certain items and new inspections to detect fatigue cracking in certain
structures and of certain significant structural items, and to revise
life limits for certain equipment and various components.
As published, that AD specifies an incorrect Docket No. (i.e., FAA-
2005-20404) throughout preamble and the regulatory text of the AD. The
correct Docket No. is FAA-2005-22404.
No other part of the regulatory information has been changed;
therefore, the final rule is not republished in the Federal Register.
The effective date of this AD remains September 28, 2005.
Sec. 39.13 [Corrected]
0
In the Federal Register of September 13, 2005, on page 53916, in the
third column, paragraph 2. of PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES of AD
2005-19-03 is corrected to read as follows:
* * * * *
2005-19-03 BAe Systems (Operations) Limited (Formerly British
Aerospace Regional Aircraft): Amendment 39-14268. Docket No. FAA-
2005-22404; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-018-AD.
* * * * *
[[Page 57127]]
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 26, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-19554 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P