Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-06; Introduction, 57448-57449 [05-19467]
Download as PDF
57448
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Summary presentation of
interim and final rules.
ACTION:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Chapter 1
Federal Acquisition Circular 2005–06;
Introduction
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: This document summarizes
the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) rules agreed to by the Civilian
Agency Acquisition Council and the
Defense Acquisition Regulations
Council in this Federal Acquisition
Circular (FAC) 2005–06. A companion
document, the Small Entity Compliance
Guide (SECG), follows this FAC. The
FAC, including the SECG, is available
via the Internet at https://
www.acqnet.gov/far.
For effective dates and comment
dates, see separate documents which
follow.
DATES:
The
FAR Secretariat, at (202) 501–4755, for
information pertaining to status or
publication schedules. For clarification
of content, contact the analyst whose
name appears in the table below in
relation to each FAR case or subject
area. Please cite FAC 2005–06 and
specific FAR case number(s). Interested
parties may also visit our Web site at
https://www.acqnet.gov/far.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Item
Subject
I ............
II ...........
III ..........
IV ..........
V ...........
VI ..........
Information Technology Security (Interim) ..........................................................................................
Improvements in Contracting for Architect-EngineerServices ............................................................
Title 40 of United States Code Reference Corrections ......................................................................
Implementation of the Anti-Lobbying Statute ......................................................................................
Increased Justification and Approval Threshold for DOD, NASA, and Coast Guard .........................
Addition of Landscaping and Pest Control Services to the Small Business Competitiveness Demonstration Program.
Powers of Attorney for Bid Bonds .......................................................................................................
Expiration of the Price Evaluation Adjustment(Interim) ......................................................................
Accounting for Unallowable Costs ......................................................................................................
Reimbursement of Relocation Costs on a Lump-Sum Basis .............................................................
Training and Education Cost Principle ................................................................................................
VII .........
VIII ........
IX ..........
X ...........
XI ..........
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Summaries for each FAR rule follow.
For the actual revisions and/or
amendments to these FAR cases, refer to
the specific item number and subject set
forth in the documents following these
item summaries.
FAC 2005–06 amends the FAR as
specified below:
Item I—Information Technology
Security (FAR Case 2004–018)
This interim rule amends the FAR to
implement the Information Technology
(IT) Security provisions of the Federal
Information Security Management Act
of 2002 (FISMA) (Title III of the EGovernment Act of 2002 (E-Gov Act)).
This interim rule focuses on the
importance of system and data security
by contracting officials and other
members of the acquisition team. The
intent of adding specific guidance in the
FAR is to provide clear, consistent
guidance to acquisition officials and
program managers; and to encourage
and strengthen communication with IT
security officials, chief information
officers, and other affected parties.
Item II—Improvements in Contracting
for Architect-Engineer Services (FAR
Case 2004–001)
This final rule implements Section
1427(b) of the Services Acquisition
Reform Act of 2003, which prohibits
architect-engineering services from
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:16 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
FAR case
being offered under GSA multipleaward schedule contracts or under
Governmentwide task and delivery
order contracts unless they are awarded
using the procedures of the Brooks
Architect-Engineer Act and the services
are performed under the direct
supervision of a professional architect
or engineer licensed, registered, or
certified in the State, Federal district or
outlying area, in which the services are
to be performed. This rule is of interest
to agencies and contracting officers that
use GSA schedules and
Governmentwide task and delivery
order contracts.
Item III—Title 40 of United States Code
Reference Corrections (FAR Case 2005–
010)
This final rule amends the FAR to
reflect the most recent codification of
Title 40 of the United States Code. No
substantive changes are being made to
the FAR.
Item IV—Implementation of the AntiLobbying Statute (FAR Case 1989–093)
This final rule converts the interim
rule published in the Federal Register at
55 FR 3190, January 30, 1990 to a final
rule with minor changes amends the
FAR to implement section 319 of the
Department of the Interior and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act, Public
Law 101–121, which added a new
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Analyst
2004–018
2004–001
2005–010
1989–093
2004–037
2004–036
Davis.
Davis.
Zaffos.
Woodson.
Jackson.
Marshall.
2003–029
2005–002
2004–006
2003–002
2001–021
Davis.
Cundiff.
Olson.
Olson.
Olson.
section 1352 to Title 31 of the United
States Code, entitled ‘‘Limitations on
the use of funds to influence certain
Federal contracting and financial
transactions.’’ Section 319 generally
prohibits recipients of Federal contracts,
grants, and loans from using
appropriated funds for lobbying the
executive or legislative branches of the
Federal Government in connection with
a specific contract, grant or loan. It also
requires that each person who requests
or receives a contract, grant or
cooperative agreement in excess of
$100,000 or a Federal commitment to
insure or guarantee a loan in excess of
$150,000 must disclose lobbying with
other than appropriated funds. The rule
requires contracting officers, in
accordance with FAR 3.808, to insert in
all solicitations and contracts expected
to exceed $100,000 the provision at FAR
52.203–11, ‘‘Certification and Disclosure
Regarding Payments to Influence
Certain Federal Transaction,’’ and the
clause at FAR 52.203–12, ‘‘Limitations
on Payments to Influence Certain
Federal Transactions.’’
Item V—Increased Justification and
Approval Threshold for DOD, NASA,
and Coast Guard (FAR Case 2004–037)
This final rule converts the interim
rule published in the Federal Register at
70 FR 11739, March 9, 2005, to a final
rule with minor changes. The rule
E:\FR\FM\30SER4.SGM
30SER4
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
amended the FAR by increasing the
justification and approval thresholds for
DoD, NASA, and the U.S. Coast Guard
from $50 million to $75 million. This
change implemented section 815 of the
Ronald W. Reagan National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005,
which amends 10 U.S.C. 2304(f)(1)(B).
In addition, corresponding changes have
been made to FAR 13.501. The rule will
reduce administrative burden for
ordering activities.
Item VI—Addition of Landscaping and
Pest Control Services to the Small
Business Competitiveness
Demonstration Program (FAR Case
2004–036)
This final rule finalizes, without
change, the interim rule published in
the Federal Register at 70 FR 11740,
March 9, 2005. The rule implements
Section 821 of the Ronald W. Reagan
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2005. Section 821 amended
Section 717 of the Small Business
Competitiveness Demonstration
Program Act of 1988 by adding
landscaping and pest control services to
the program. As a result, agencies are
precluded from considering acquisitions
for landscaping and pest control
services over the emerging small
business reserve amount, currently
$25,000, for small business set-asides
unless the set-asides are needed to meet
their assigned goals. The change may
impact small businesses because these
awards were previously set-aside for
small businesses.
Item VII—Powers of Attorney for Bid
Bonds (FAR Case 2003–029)
This final rule is of particular interest
to contracting officers and offerors in
acquisitions of construction that require
a bid bond. This rule was initiated at the
request of the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy to resolve the
controversy surrounding contracting
officers’ decisions regarding the
evaluation of bid bonds and
accompanying powers of attorney. This
rule amends the FAR to revise the
policy relating to acceptance of copies
of powers of attorney accompanying bid
bonds. This revision to FAR parts 19
and 28 removes the matter of
authenticity and enforceability of
powers of attorney from a contracting
officer’s responsiveness determination,
which is based solely on documents
available at the time of bid opening.
Instead, the rule instructs contracting
officers to address these issues after bid
opening.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:16 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
Item VIII—Expiration of the Price
Evaluation Adjustment (FAR Case
2005–002)
This interim rule cancels the
authority for civilian agencies, other
than NASA and the U.S. Coast Guard,
to apply the price evaluation adjustment
to certain small disadvantaged business
concerns in competitive acquisitions.
The change is required because the
statutory authority for the adjustments
has expired. As a result, certain small
disadvantaged business concerns will
no longer benefit from the adjustments.
DoD, NASA, and the U.S. Coast Guard
are authorized to continue applying the
price evaluation adjustment.
Item IX—Accounting for Unallowable
Costs (FAR Case 2004–006)
This final rule amends FAR 31.201–
6, Accounting for unallowable costs, by
adding paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(5)
to provide specific criteria on the use of
statistical sampling as an acceptable
practice to identify unallowable costs,
including the applicability of penalties
for failure to exclude certain projected
unallowable costs. The final rule also
amends FAR 31.109, Advance
agreements, by adding ‘‘statistical
sampling methods’’ as an example of the
type of item for which an advance
agreement may be appropriate. The case
was initiated by the Director, Defense
Procurement and Acquisition Policy,
who established an interagency ad hoc
committee to perform a comprehensive
review of FAR Part 31, Contract Cost
Principles and Procedures. The rule is
of particular importance to contracting
officers and contractors who negotiate
contracts and modifications, and
determine costs in accordance with FAR
Part 31.
Item X—Reimbursement of Relocation
Costs on a Lump-Sum Basis (FAR Case
2003–002)
This final rule amends FAR 31.205–
35 to permit contractors the option of
being reimbursed on a lump-sum basis
for three types of employee relocation
costs: (1) costs of finding a new home,
(2) costs of travel to the new location,
and (3) costs of temporary lodging.
These three types of costs are in
addition to the miscellaneous relocation
costs for which lump-sum
reimbursements are already permitted.
Item XI—Training and Education Cost
Principle (FAR Case 2001–021)
This final rule amends the FAR by
revising the contract cost principle at
FAR 31.205–44, Training and education
costs. The amendment streamlines the
cost principle and increases clarity by
eliminating restrictive and confusing
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
57449
language, and by restructuring the rule
to list only specifically unallowable
costs.
Dated: September 22, 2005.
Julia B. Wise,
Director,Contract Policy Division.
Federal Acquisition Circular
Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC)
2005-06 is issued under the authority of
the Secretary of Defense, the
Administrator of General Services, and
the Administrator for the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Unless otherwise specified, all
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
and other directive material contained
in FAC 2005-06 is effective October 31,
2005, except for Items I, II, III, IV, V, VI,
VII, and VIII, which are effective
September 30, 2005.
Dated: September 15, 2005.
Vincent J. Feck, Lt Col, USAF
Acting Director, Defense Procurement and
Acquisition Policy.
Dated: September 22, 2005.
David A. Drabkin,
Senior Procurement Executive, Office of the
Chief Acquisition Officer, General Services
Administration.
Dated: September 14, 2005.
Anne Guenther,
Acting Assistant Administrator for
Procurement, National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–19467 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1, 2, 7, 11, and 39
[FAC 2005–06; FAR Case 2004–018;
Item I]
RIN 9000–AK29
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Information Technology Security
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency
Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council
(Councils) have agreed on an interim
rule amending the Federal Acquisition
E:\FR\FM\30SER4.SGM
30SER4
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57448-57449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19467]
[[Page 57447]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part V
Department of Defense
General Services Administration
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
48 CFR Chapter 1, Parts 1, 2, 3, et al.
Federal Acquisition Regulations; Interim and Final Rules
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 57448]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Chapter 1
Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-06; Introduction
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Summary presentation of interim and final rules.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document summarizes the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) rules agreed to by the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and
the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council in this Federal Acquisition
Circular (FAC) 2005-06. A companion document, the Small Entity
Compliance Guide (SECG), follows this FAC. The FAC, including the SECG,
is available via the Internet at https://www.acqnet.gov/far.
DATES: For effective dates and comment dates, see separate documents
which follow.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FAR Secretariat, at (202) 501-
4755, for information pertaining to status or publication schedules.
For clarification of content, contact the analyst whose name appears in
the table below in relation to each FAR case or subject area. Please
cite FAC 2005-06 and specific FAR case number(s). Interested parties
may also visit our Web site at https://www.acqnet.gov/far.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item Subject FAR case Analyst
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I.............. Information Technology Security (Interim).... 2004-018 Davis.
II............. Improvements in Contracting for Architect- 2004-001 Davis.
EngineerServices.
III............ Title 40 of United States Code Reference 2005-010 Zaffos.
Corrections.
IV............. Implementation of the Anti-Lobbying Statute.. 1989-093 Woodson.
V.............. Increased Justification and Approval 2004-037 Jackson.
Threshold for DOD, NASA, and Coast Guard.
VI............. Addition of Landscaping and Pest Control 2004-036 Marshall.
Services to the Small Business
Competitiveness Demonstration Program.
VII............ Powers of Attorney for Bid Bonds............. 2003-029 Davis.
VIII........... Expiration of the Price Evaluation 2005-002 Cundiff.
Adjustment(Interim).
IX............. Accounting for Unallowable Costs............. 2004-006 Olson.
X.............. Reimbursement of Relocation Costs on a Lump- 2003-002 Olson.
Sum Basis.
XI............. Training and Education Cost Principle........ 2001-021 Olson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summaries for each FAR rule follow. For the
actual revisions and/or amendments to these FAR cases, refer to the
specific item number and subject set forth in the documents following
these item summaries.
FAC 2005-06 amends the FAR as specified below:
Item I--Information Technology Security (FAR Case 2004-018)
This interim rule amends the FAR to implement the Information
Technology (IT) Security provisions of the Federal Information Security
Management Act of 2002 (FISMA) (Title III of the E-Government Act of
2002 (E-Gov Act)).
This interim rule focuses on the importance of system and data
security by contracting officials and other members of the acquisition
team. The intent of adding specific guidance in the FAR is to provide
clear, consistent guidance to acquisition officials and program
managers; and to encourage and strengthen communication with IT
security officials, chief information officers, and other affected
parties.
Item II--Improvements in Contracting for Architect-Engineer Services
(FAR Case 2004-001)
This final rule implements Section 1427(b) of the Services
Acquisition Reform Act of 2003, which prohibits architect-engineering
services from being offered under GSA multiple-award schedule contracts
or under Governmentwide task and delivery order contracts unless they
are awarded using the procedures of the Brooks Architect-Engineer Act
and the services are performed under the direct supervision of a
professional architect or engineer licensed, registered, or certified
in the State, Federal district or outlying area, in which the services
are to be performed. This rule is of interest to agencies and
contracting officers that use GSA schedules and Governmentwide task and
delivery order contracts.
Item III--Title 40 of United States Code Reference Corrections (FAR
Case 2005-010)
This final rule amends the FAR to reflect the most recent
codification of Title 40 of the United States Code. No substantive
changes are being made to the FAR.
Item IV--Implementation of the Anti-Lobbying Statute (FAR Case 1989-
093)
This final rule converts the interim rule published in the Federal
Register at 55 FR 3190, January 30, 1990 to a final rule with minor
changes amends the FAR to implement section 319 of the Department of
the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, Public Law 101-
121, which added a new section 1352 to Title 31 of the United States
Code, entitled ``Limitations on the use of funds to influence certain
Federal contracting and financial transactions.'' Section 319 generally
prohibits recipients of Federal contracts, grants, and loans from using
appropriated funds for lobbying the executive or legislative branches
of the Federal Government in connection with a specific contract, grant
or loan. It also requires that each person who requests or receives a
contract, grant or cooperative agreement in excess of $100,000 or a
Federal commitment to insure or guarantee a loan in excess of $150,000
must disclose lobbying with other than appropriated funds. The rule
requires contracting officers, in accordance with FAR 3.808, to insert
in all solicitations and contracts expected to exceed $100,000 the
provision at FAR 52.203-11, ``Certification and Disclosure Regarding
Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transaction,'' and the clause at
FAR 52.203-12, ``Limitations on Payments to Influence Certain Federal
Transactions.''
Item V--Increased Justification and Approval Threshold for DOD, NASA,
and Coast Guard (FAR Case 2004-037)
This final rule converts the interim rule published in the Federal
Register at 70 FR 11739, March 9, 2005, to a final rule with minor
changes. The rule
[[Page 57449]]
amended the FAR by increasing the justification and approval thresholds
for DoD, NASA, and the U.S. Coast Guard from $50 million to $75
million. This change implemented section 815 of the Ronald W. Reagan
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005, which amends
10 U.S.C. 2304(f)(1)(B). In addition, corresponding changes have been
made to FAR 13.501. The rule will reduce administrative burden for
ordering activities.
Item VI--Addition of Landscaping and Pest Control Services to the Small
Business Competitiveness Demonstration Program (FAR Case 2004-036)
This final rule finalizes, without change, the interim rule
published in the Federal Register at 70 FR 11740, March 9, 2005. The
rule implements Section 821 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005. Section 821 amended Section 717
of the Small Business Competitiveness Demonstration Program Act of 1988
by adding landscaping and pest control services to the program. As a
result, agencies are precluded from considering acquisitions for
landscaping and pest control services over the emerging small business
reserve amount, currently $25,000, for small business set-asides unless
the set-asides are needed to meet their assigned goals. The change may
impact small businesses because these awards were previously set-aside
for small businesses.
Item VII--Powers of Attorney for Bid Bonds (FAR Case 2003-029)
This final rule is of particular interest to contracting officers
and offerors in acquisitions of construction that require a bid bond.
This rule was initiated at the request of the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy to resolve the controversy surrounding contracting
officers' decisions regarding the evaluation of bid bonds and
accompanying powers of attorney. This rule amends the FAR to revise the
policy relating to acceptance of copies of powers of attorney
accompanying bid bonds. This revision to FAR parts 19 and 28 removes
the matter of authenticity and enforceability of powers of attorney
from a contracting officer's responsiveness determination, which is
based solely on documents available at the time of bid opening.
Instead, the rule instructs contracting officers to address these
issues after bid opening.
Item VIII--Expiration of the Price Evaluation Adjustment (FAR Case
2005-002)
This interim rule cancels the authority for civilian agencies,
other than NASA and the U.S. Coast Guard, to apply the price evaluation
adjustment to certain small disadvantaged business concerns in
competitive acquisitions. The change is required because the statutory
authority for the adjustments has expired. As a result, certain small
disadvantaged business concerns will no longer benefit from the
adjustments. DoD, NASA, and the U.S. Coast Guard are authorized to
continue applying the price evaluation adjustment.
Item IX--Accounting for Unallowable Costs (FAR Case 2004-006)
This final rule amends FAR 31.201-6, Accounting for unallowable
costs, by adding paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(5) to provide specific
criteria on the use of statistical sampling as an acceptable practice
to identify unallowable costs, including the applicability of penalties
for failure to exclude certain projected unallowable costs. The final
rule also amends FAR 31.109, Advance agreements, by adding
``statistical sampling methods'' as an example of the type of item for
which an advance agreement may be appropriate. The case was initiated
by the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, who
established an interagency ad hoc committee to perform a comprehensive
review of FAR Part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures. The
rule is of particular importance to contracting officers and
contractors who negotiate contracts and modifications, and determine
costs in accordance with FAR Part 31.
Item X--Reimbursement of Relocation Costs on a Lump-Sum Basis (FAR Case
2003-002)
This final rule amends FAR 31.205-35 to permit contractors the
option of being reimbursed on a lump-sum basis for three types of
employee relocation costs: (1) costs of finding a new home, (2) costs
of travel to the new location, and (3) costs of temporary lodging.
These three types of costs are in addition to the miscellaneous
relocation costs for which lump-sum reimbursements are already
permitted.
Item XI--Training and Education Cost Principle (FAR Case 2001-021)
This final rule amends the FAR by revising the contract cost
principle at FAR 31.205-44, Training and education costs. The amendment
streamlines the cost principle and increases clarity by eliminating
restrictive and confusing language, and by restructuring the rule to
list only specifically unallowable costs.
Dated: September 22, 2005.
Julia B. Wise,
Director,Contract Policy Division.
Federal Acquisition Circular
Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-06 is issued under the
authority of the Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General
Services, and the Administrator for the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
Unless otherwise specified, all Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) and other directive material contained in FAC 2005-06 is
effective October 31, 2005, except for Items I, II, III, IV, V, VI,
VII, and VIII, which are effective September 30, 2005.
Dated: September 15, 2005.
Vincent J. Feck, Lt Col, USAF
Acting Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy.
Dated: September 22, 2005.
David A. Drabkin,
Senior Procurement Executive, Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer,
General Services Administration.
Dated: September 14, 2005.
Anne Guenther,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Procurement, National Aeronautics
and Space Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-19467 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S