Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; Permits by Rule, 56566-56569 [05-19358]
Download as PDF
56566
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Cessna
441. Should Premier Avionics apply at
a later date for a supplemental type
certificate to modify any other model on
the same type certificate data sheet to
incorporate the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would apply to that model as well
under the provisions of § 21.101.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
of airplane. It is not a rule of general
applicability and affects only the
applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the
airplane.
The substance of these special
conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several
prior instances and has been derived
without substantive change from those
previously issued. It is unlikely that
prior public comment would result in a
significant change from the substance
contained herein. For this reason, and
because a delay would significantly
affect the certification of the airplane,
which is imminent, the FAA has
determined that prior public notice and
comment are unnecessary and
impracticable, and good cause exists for
adopting these special conditions upon
issuance. The FAA is requesting
comments to allow interested persons to
submit views that may not have been
submitted in response to the prior
opportunities for comment described
above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and
symbols.
Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and
44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.101; and 14 CFR
11.38 and 11.19.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the following special conditions are
issued as part of the type certification
basis for the Cessna 441 airplane
modified by Premier Avionics Design
Ltd. to add two Thommen AD32E Air
Data Display Units.
1. Protection of Electrical and
Electronic Systems from High Intensity
Radiated Fields (HIRF). Each system
that performs critical functions must be
designed and installed to ensure that the
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Sep 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
operations, and operational capabilities
of these systems to perform critical
functions, are not adversely affected
when the airplane is exposed to high
intensity radiated electromagnetic fields
external to the airplane.
2. For the purpose of these special
conditions, the following definition
applies: Critical Functions: Functions
whose failure would contribute to, or
cause, a failure condition that would
prevent the continued safe flight and
landing of the airplane.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on
September 13, 2005.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–19289 Filed 9–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R06–OAR–2005–TX–0016; FRL–7975–9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Texas;
Permits by Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for
the State of Texas. This action removes
a provision from the Texas SIP which
provided public notice for concrete
batch plants which were constructed
under a permit by rule (PBR). On
September 1, 2000, Texas replaced the
PBR for concrete batch plants with a
standard permit for concrete batch
plants. The standard permit for concrete
batch plants also requires public notice
for concrete batch plants subject to the
standard permit. Texas maintained the
public notice requirements of its PBR to
assure that proper procedures were
followed for concrete batch plants that
were permitted under the PBR prior to
the effective date of the standard permit.
All authorization requests for concrete
batch plants which were constructed
under the PBR have now been resolved
and the public notice and comment
provisions under the PBR are no longer
needed.
DATES: This rule is effective on
November 28, 2005 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comment by October 28, 2005. If EPA
receives such comment, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Register informing the public
that this rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Regional Material in
DOCKET (RME) ID No. R06–OAR–
2005–TX–0016, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Regional
Material in DOCKET (RME), EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, is EPA’s preferred method for
receiving comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key
in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• U.S. EPA Region 6 ‘‘Contact Us’’
Web site: https://epa.gov/region6/
r6coment.htm. Please click on ‘‘6PD’’
(Multimedia) and select ‘‘Air’’ before
submitting comments.
• E-mail: Mr. David Neleigh at
neleigh.david@epa.gov. Please also cc
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
• Fax: Mr. David Neleigh, Chief, Air
Permits Section (6PD–R), at fax number
214–665–7263.
• Mail: Mr. David Neleigh, Chief, Air
Permits Section (6PD–R), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
• Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr.
David Neleigh, Chief, Air Permits
Section (6PD–R), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Such deliveries are accepted only
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
weekdays except for legal holidays.
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Regional Material in DOCKET (RME) ID
No. R06–OAR–2005–TX–0016. EPA’s
policy is that all comments received
will be included in the public file
without change, and may be made
available online at https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Do not submit information
through Regional Material in DOCKET
(RME), Regulations.gov, or e-mail if you
believe that it is CBI or otherwise
protected from disclosure. The EPA
RME Web site and the federal
regulations.gov are ‘‘anonymous access’’
systems, which means EPA will not
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through RME or regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public file and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
Regional Material in DOCKET (RME)
index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or
in the official file which is available at
the Air Permits Section (6PD–R),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733. The file will be made
available by appointment for public
inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review
Room between the hours of 8:30 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal
holidays. Contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at
(214) 665–7523 to make an
appointment. If possible, please make
the appointment at least two working
days in advance of your visit. There will
be a 15 cent per page fee for making
photocopies of documents. On the day
of the visit, please check in at the EPA
Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
The state submittal is also available
for public inspection at the state Air
Agency listed below during official
business hours by appointment:
Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, Office of Air Quality, 12124
Park 35 Circle, Austin, Texas 78753.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley M. Spruiell, Air Permits Section
(6PD–R), Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Sep 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,
telephone (214) 665–7212; fax number
214–665–7263; e-mail address
spruiell.stanley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA. Outline:
I. What Action Are We Taking?
II. What Is a State Implementation Plan?
III. What Does Federal Approval of a SIP
Mean to Me?
IV. What Did the State Submit?
V. Why Are We Approving the Removal of
Section 106.5?
VI. Final Action
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What Action Are We Taking?
This action removes 30 TAC, section
106.5 from the Texas SIP. This section
provided public notice for concrete
batch plants which were constructed
under a PBR.1 On September 1, 2000,
Texas replaced the PBR for concrete
batch plants with a standard permit 2 for
concrete batch plants. The standard
permit for concrete batch plants also
requires public notice for concrete batch
plants which are subject to the standard
permit. Texas maintained the public
notice requirements of section 106.5 to
assure that proper procedures were
followed for concrete batch plants that
were permitted under the PBR prior to
the effective date of the standard permit.
All authorization requests for concrete
batch plants which were constructed
under the PBR have now been resolved
and section 106.5 is no longer needed.
Texas submitted a SIP revision to
remove section 106.5.
II. What Is a State Implementation
Plan?
Section 110 of the Act requires States
to develop air pollution regulations and
control strategies to ensure that the state
1 A PBR is a permit which is adopted under
Chapter 106, which provides an alternative process
for approving the construction of new and modified
facilities which Texas has determined will not
make a significant contribution of air contaminants
to the atmosphere. These provisions provide a
streamlined mechanism for approving the
construction of certain small sources which would
otherwise be required to apply for and receive a
permit before commencing construction or
modification. For further description of Texas
regulations concerning PBRs see the discussion in
our November 14, 2003 approval (68 FR 64544–45).
2 A standard permit is a permit which is adopted
under Chapter 116,Subchapter F, which provides
an alternative process for approving the
construction of certain categories of new and
modified sources for which the TCEQ has adopted
a standard permit. These provisions provide a
streamlined mechanism for approving the
construction of certain sources within categories
which contain numerous similar sources. For
further description of Texas regulations concerning
standard permits, see the discussion in our
November 14, 2003 approval (68 FR 64546–47).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56567
air quality meets the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) that
EPA has established. Under section 109
of the Act, EPA established the NAAQS
to protect public health. The NAAQS
address six criteria pollutants. These
pollutants are: carbon monoxide,
nitrogen dioxide, ozone, lead,
particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
Each state must submit these
regulations and control strategies to us
for approval and incorporation into the
federally enforceable SIP. Each state has
a SIP designed to protect air quality.
These SIPs can be extensive, containing
state regulations or other enforceable
documents and supporting information
such as emission inventories,
monitoring networks, and modeling
demonstrations.
III. What Does Federal Approval of a
SIP Mean to Me?
A state may enforce state regulations
before and after we incorporate those
regulations into a federally approved
SIP. After we incorporate those
regulations into a federally approved
SIP, both EPA and the public may also
take enforcement action against
violators of these regulations.
IV. What Did the State Submit?
This action addresses Texas’ SIP
submittal to EPA by letter dated June 28,
2004. In the submittal, Texas submitted
its repeal of section106.5—Public
Notice, which it adopted June 9, 2004.
Section 106.5 required public notice for
concrete batch plants permitted under
Chapter 106—Permits by Rule. With the
creation of the concrete batch plant
standard permit on September 1, 2000,
and the repeal of the concrete batch
plant PBR, section 106.5 is no longer
needed. Texas maintained the public
notice requirements of section 106.5 to
assure that proper procedures were
followed for the concrete batch plant
PBR registrations received prior to the
effective date of the standard permit for
concrete batch plants. At this time,
Texas has resolved all of the
outstanding authorization requests for
concrete batch plants permitted under
Chapter 106. Consequently, the
maintenance of section 106.5 is no
longer needed.
V. Why Are We Approving the Removal
of Section 106.5?
We approved section 106.5 on
November 14, 2003 (68 FR 64543–50)
when we approved Chapter 106—
Permits by Rule into the Texas SIP.
Section 106.5—Public Notice applies to
the construction of permanent or
temporary concrete batch plants that are
constructed under Chapter 106. Under
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
56568
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
section 106.5, each concrete batch plant
constructed under Chapter 106 must
conduct public notice of the proposed
construction. On September 1, 2000,
Texas issued a standard permit for
concrete batch plants. This standard
permit replaced the requirements for
PBRs applicable to concrete batch
plants. Texas maintained its
requirements for concrete batch plants
(including the requirements for public
notice) to assure that proper procedures
were followed for the concrete batch
plant PBR registrations received prior to
the effective date of the standard permit
for concrete batch plants. Because all of
the outstanding authorization requests
for concrete batch plants permitted
under Chapter 106 have been resolved,
the maintenance of the requirements for
concrete batch plants under Chapter 106
is no longer needed.
On June 9, 2004, Texas repealed its
PBRs for concrete batch plants and
section 106.5. Section 106.5 is no longer
necessary due to the issuance of the
standard permit for concrete batch plant
standard which was in accordance with
section 116.602—Issuance of Standard
Permits and because Texas has resolved
all outstanding authorization requests
for concrete batch plants permitted
under Chapter 106 received prior to the
effective date of the standard permit.
Under Texas Health and Safety Code,
section 382.058, concrete batch plant
PBRs are subject to notice and
opportunity for hearing provisions. The
concrete batch plant PBR was the only
PBR in Chapter 106 that required public
notice. With the creation of the concrete
batch plant standard permit, concrete
batch plants are no longer authorized by
a PBR under Chapter 106. The public
notice requirements for concrete batch
plants are now contained in the
standard permit; therefore section 106.5
is no longer needed.
The removal of section 106.5 will not
affect the obligation for Texas to provide
for public notice when it issues new or
revised PBR. The process for issuing,
revising, and removing PBR is through
rulemaking under which new and
revised PBR must undergo public notice
and a 30-day comment period which
meets the requirements of 40 CFR
51.161, which provides for public notice
prior to approval of any new or
modified source which is subject to the
PBR. The basis for how Texas program
for PBR meets these requirements is
discussed in our November 14, 2003
approval of Chapter 106. See 68 FR
64545.
The standard permit for concrete
batch plants was originally issued in
2000 (effective September 1, 2000) and
was later revised in 2003 (effective July
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Sep 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
10, 2003). The standard permits for
batch concrete plants were issued after
notice an opportunity for public
comment and public hearing as required
under section 116.605. The process for
public participation meets our
requirements under 40 CFR 51.161,
which provides for public notice prior
to approval of any new or modified
source which is subject to the PBR. The
basis for how the Texas program for
standard permits meets these
requirements is discussed in our
November 14, 2003, approval of Texas
provisions for standard permits. See 68
FR 64547. The standard permit for batch
concrete plants also contain a provision
pertaining to public notice which
requires public notice for concrete batch
plants which are subject to the standard
permit.
The public notice requirements under
section 106.5 and under the standard
permit for concrete batch plants is an
additional notice to the public notice
required under 40 CFR 51.161. As
discussed above and in greater detail in
our November 14, 2003, approval of the
PBR and standard permits, each new
and modified PBR and standard permit
(including the PBR and standard permit
for concrete batch plants) must be
subject public notice and comment. We
found that public notice provisions for
PBR and standard permits meet the
requirement of 40 CFR 51.161. See 68
FR 64545. Accordingly, the adoption of
the PBR and later the standard permit
for concrete batch plants were subject to
public notice which meet these public
notice requirements at the time of
adoption. The public participation
requirement and the standard permit for
concrete batch plants is an additional
public notice that Texas requires under
Texas Health and Safety Code, section
382.058. Our approval of this additional
requirement for the public notice
provisions for concrete batch plants
serves to strengthen the SIP.
Furthermore, the maintenance of
section 106.5 in the SIP serves no useful
purpose because Texas has repealed the
PBR for concrete batch plants. The
process for removing these PBR was in
accordance with the program that we
approved for Texas PBR. Since section
106.5 is limited only to PBR for concrete
batch plants, and since Texas has
repealed these PBR from Chapter 106,
section 106.5 is no longer needed.
VI. Final Action
On the basis of the above analysis and
evaluation we conclude that we can
remove the provisions of section 106.5
from the SIP on the basis that Texas
replaced the PBR for concrete batch
plants, which required public notice,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
with a standard permit for concrete
batch plants that also requires public
notice for concrete batch plants that are
subject to the standard permit.
We are publishing this rule without
prior proposal because we view this as
a noncontroversial amendment and
anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication, we
are publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
SIP revision if adverse comments are
received. This rule will be effective on
November 28, 2005 without further
notice unless we receive adverse
comment by October 28, 2005. If we
receive adverse comments, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect. We will
address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. We will not institute a
second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting
must do so at this time. Please note that
if we receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the state to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Sep 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by November 28,
2005. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon Monoxide,
Hydrocarbons, Intergovernmental
relations, Lead, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 19, 2005.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
I
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS—Texas
2. The table in § 52.2270(c) entitled
‘‘EPA Approved Regulations in the
Texas SIP’’ is amended under chapter
106, subchapter A, by removing the
entry for section 106.5, ‘‘Public Notice.’’
I
[FR Doc. 05–19358 Filed 9–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP–2005–0244; FRL–773-5]
Muscodor albus QST 20799 and the
Volatiles Produced on Rehydration;
Exemption from the Requirement of a
Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of the Muscodor
albus (M. albus) QST 20799 and the
volatiles produced on its rehydration on
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56569
all food commodities when applied or
used for all agricultural applications,
including seed, propagule and post
harvest treatments. This action is in
response to a pesticide petition
submitted to EPA under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
as amended by the Food Quality
Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA),
requesting an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of M. albus QST 20799 and
the volatiles produced on its
rehydration.
DATES: This regulation is effective
September 28, 2005. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before November 28, 2005.
ADDRESSES: To submit a written
objection or hearing request follow the
detailed instructions as provided in
Unit IX. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
identification (ID) number OPP–2005–
0244. All documents in the docket are
listed in the EDOCKET index at https://
www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed
in the index, some information is not
publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
copy at the Public Information and
Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm.
119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA. This docket facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shanaz Bacchus, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511C),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
703–308–8097; e-mail address:
bacchus.shanaz@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111);
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56566-56569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19358]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R06-OAR-2005-TX-0016; FRL-7975-9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Texas; Permits by Rule
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for the State of Texas. This action
removes a provision from the Texas SIP which provided public notice for
concrete batch plants which were constructed under a permit by rule
(PBR). On September 1, 2000, Texas replaced the PBR for concrete batch
plants with a standard permit for concrete batch plants. The standard
permit for concrete batch plants also requires public notice for
concrete batch plants subject to the standard permit. Texas maintained
the public notice requirements of its PBR to assure that proper
procedures were followed for concrete batch plants that were permitted
under the PBR prior to the effective date of the standard permit. All
authorization requests for concrete batch plants which were constructed
under the PBR have now been resolved and the public notice and comment
provisions under the PBR are no longer needed.
DATES: This rule is effective on November 28, 2005 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by October 28, 2005. If EPA
receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Regional Material in
DOCKET (RME) ID No. R06-OAR-2005-TX-0016, by one of the following
methods:
Federal rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Regional
Material in DOCKET (RME), EPA's electronic public docket and comment
system, is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the
system, select ``quick search,'' then key in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
U.S. EPA Region 6 ``Contact Us'' Web site: https://epa.gov/
region6/r6coment.htm. Please click on ``6PD'' (Multimedia) and select
``Air'' before submitting comments.
E-mail: Mr. David Neleigh at neleigh.david@epa.gov. Please
also cc the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section below.
Fax: Mr. David Neleigh, Chief, Air Permits Section (6PD-
R), at fax number 214-665-7263.
Mail: Mr. David Neleigh, Chief, Air Permits Section (6PD-
R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. David Neleigh, Chief, Air
Permits Section (6PD-R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Such deliveries are
accepted only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays except
for legal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries
of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Regional Material in DOCKET
(RME) ID No. R06-OAR-2005-TX-0016. EPA's policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public file without change, and may be
made available online at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any
personal information provided, unless the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Do not
submit information through Regional Material in DOCKET (RME),
Regulations.gov, or e-mail if you believe that it is CBI or otherwise
protected from disclosure. The EPA RME Web site and the federal
regulations.gov are ``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will
not
[[Page 56567]]
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA
without going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will
be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public file and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
Regional Material in DOCKET (RME) index at https://docket.epa.gov/
rmepub/. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or in the official file which is
available at the Air Permits Section (6PD-R), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. The file
will be made available by appointment for public inspection in the
Region 6 FOIA Review Room between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
weekdays except for legal holidays. Contact the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at
(214) 665-7523 to make an appointment. If possible, please make the
appointment at least two working days in advance of your visit. There
will be a 15 cent per page fee for making photocopies of documents. On
the day of the visit, please check in at the EPA Region 6 reception
area at 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
The state submittal is also available for public inspection at the
state Air Agency listed below during official business hours by
appointment:
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Office of Air Quality,
12124 Park 35 Circle, Austin, Texas 78753.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley M. Spruiell, Air Permits
Section (6PD-R), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-7212;
fax number 214-665-7263; e-mail address spruiell.stanley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA. Outline:
I. What Action Are We Taking?
II. What Is a State Implementation Plan?
III. What Does Federal Approval of a SIP Mean to Me?
IV. What Did the State Submit?
V. Why Are We Approving the Removal of Section 106.5?
VI. Final Action
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What Action Are We Taking?
This action removes 30 TAC, section 106.5 from the Texas SIP. This
section provided public notice for concrete batch plants which were
constructed under a PBR.\1\ On September 1, 2000, Texas replaced the
PBR for concrete batch plants with a standard permit \2\ for concrete
batch plants. The standard permit for concrete batch plants also
requires public notice for concrete batch plants which are subject to
the standard permit. Texas maintained the public notice requirements of
section 106.5 to assure that proper procedures were followed for
concrete batch plants that were permitted under the PBR prior to the
effective date of the standard permit. All authorization requests for
concrete batch plants which were constructed under the PBR have now
been resolved and section 106.5 is no longer needed. Texas submitted a
SIP revision to remove section 106.5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A PBR is a permit which is adopted under Chapter 106, which
provides an alternative process for approving the construction of
new and modified facilities which Texas has determined will not make
a significant contribution of air contaminants to the atmosphere.
These provisions provide a streamlined mechanism for approving the
construction of certain small sources which would otherwise be
required to apply for and receive a permit before commencing
construction or modification. For further description of Texas
regulations concerning PBRs see the discussion in our November 14,
2003 approval (68 FR 64544-45).
\2\ A standard permit is a permit which is adopted under Chapter
116,Subchapter F, which provides an alternative process for
approving the construction of certain categories of new and modified
sources for which the TCEQ has adopted a standard permit. These
provisions provide a streamlined mechanism for approving the
construction of certain sources within categories which contain
numerous similar sources. For further description of Texas
regulations concerning standard permits, see the discussion in our
November 14, 2003 approval (68 FR 64546-47).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. What Is a State Implementation Plan?
Section 110 of the Act requires States to develop air pollution
regulations and control strategies to ensure that the state air quality
meets the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) that EPA has
established. Under section 109 of the Act, EPA established the NAAQS to
protect public health. The NAAQS address six criteria pollutants. These
pollutants are: carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, lead,
particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
Each state must submit these regulations and control strategies to
us for approval and incorporation into the federally enforceable SIP.
Each state has a SIP designed to protect air quality. These SIPs can be
extensive, containing state regulations or other enforceable documents
and supporting information such as emission inventories, monitoring
networks, and modeling demonstrations.
III. What Does Federal Approval of a SIP Mean to Me?
A state may enforce state regulations before and after we
incorporate those regulations into a federally approved SIP. After we
incorporate those regulations into a federally approved SIP, both EPA
and the public may also take enforcement action against violators of
these regulations.
IV. What Did the State Submit?
This action addresses Texas' SIP submittal to EPA by letter dated
June 28, 2004. In the submittal, Texas submitted its repeal of
section106.5--Public Notice, which it adopted June 9, 2004. Section
106.5 required public notice for concrete batch plants permitted under
Chapter 106--Permits by Rule. With the creation of the concrete batch
plant standard permit on September 1, 2000, and the repeal of the
concrete batch plant PBR, section 106.5 is no longer needed. Texas
maintained the public notice requirements of section 106.5 to assure
that proper procedures were followed for the concrete batch plant PBR
registrations received prior to the effective date of the standard
permit for concrete batch plants. At this time, Texas has resolved all
of the outstanding authorization requests for concrete batch plants
permitted under Chapter 106. Consequently, the maintenance of section
106.5 is no longer needed.
V. Why Are We Approving the Removal of Section 106.5?
We approved section 106.5 on November 14, 2003 (68 FR 64543-50)
when we approved Chapter 106--Permits by Rule into the Texas SIP.
Section 106.5--Public Notice applies to the construction of permanent
or temporary concrete batch plants that are constructed under Chapter
106. Under
[[Page 56568]]
section 106.5, each concrete batch plant constructed under Chapter 106
must conduct public notice of the proposed construction. On September
1, 2000, Texas issued a standard permit for concrete batch plants. This
standard permit replaced the requirements for PBRs applicable to
concrete batch plants. Texas maintained its requirements for concrete
batch plants (including the requirements for public notice) to assure
that proper procedures were followed for the concrete batch plant PBR
registrations received prior to the effective date of the standard
permit for concrete batch plants. Because all of the outstanding
authorization requests for concrete batch plants permitted under
Chapter 106 have been resolved, the maintenance of the requirements for
concrete batch plants under Chapter 106 is no longer needed.
On June 9, 2004, Texas repealed its PBRs for concrete batch plants
and section 106.5. Section 106.5 is no longer necessary due to the
issuance of the standard permit for concrete batch plant standard which
was in accordance with section 116.602--Issuance of Standard Permits
and because Texas has resolved all outstanding authorization requests
for concrete batch plants permitted under Chapter 106 received prior to
the effective date of the standard permit.
Under Texas Health and Safety Code, section 382.058, concrete batch
plant PBRs are subject to notice and opportunity for hearing
provisions. The concrete batch plant PBR was the only PBR in Chapter
106 that required public notice. With the creation of the concrete
batch plant standard permit, concrete batch plants are no longer
authorized by a PBR under Chapter 106. The public notice requirements
for concrete batch plants are now contained in the standard permit;
therefore section 106.5 is no longer needed.
The removal of section 106.5 will not affect the obligation for
Texas to provide for public notice when it issues new or revised PBR.
The process for issuing, revising, and removing PBR is through
rulemaking under which new and revised PBR must undergo public notice
and a 30-day comment period which meets the requirements of 40 CFR
51.161, which provides for public notice prior to approval of any new
or modified source which is subject to the PBR. The basis for how Texas
program for PBR meets these requirements is discussed in our November
14, 2003 approval of Chapter 106. See 68 FR 64545.
The standard permit for concrete batch plants was originally issued
in 2000 (effective September 1, 2000) and was later revised in 2003
(effective July 10, 2003). The standard permits for batch concrete
plants were issued after notice an opportunity for public comment and
public hearing as required under section 116.605. The process for
public participation meets our requirements under 40 CFR 51.161, which
provides for public notice prior to approval of any new or modified
source which is subject to the PBR. The basis for how the Texas program
for standard permits meets these requirements is discussed in our
November 14, 2003, approval of Texas provisions for standard permits.
See 68 FR 64547. The standard permit for batch concrete plants also
contain a provision pertaining to public notice which requires public
notice for concrete batch plants which are subject to the standard
permit.
The public notice requirements under section 106.5 and under the
standard permit for concrete batch plants is an additional notice to
the public notice required under 40 CFR 51.161. As discussed above and
in greater detail in our November 14, 2003, approval of the PBR and
standard permits, each new and modified PBR and standard permit
(including the PBR and standard permit for concrete batch plants) must
be subject public notice and comment. We found that public notice
provisions for PBR and standard permits meet the requirement of 40 CFR
51.161. See 68 FR 64545. Accordingly, the adoption of the PBR and later
the standard permit for concrete batch plants were subject to public
notice which meet these public notice requirements at the time of
adoption. The public participation requirement and the standard permit
for concrete batch plants is an additional public notice that Texas
requires under Texas Health and Safety Code, section 382.058. Our
approval of this additional requirement for the public notice
provisions for concrete batch plants serves to strengthen the SIP.
Furthermore, the maintenance of section 106.5 in the SIP serves no
useful purpose because Texas has repealed the PBR for concrete batch
plants. The process for removing these PBR was in accordance with the
program that we approved for Texas PBR. Since section 106.5 is limited
only to PBR for concrete batch plants, and since Texas has repealed
these PBR from Chapter 106, section 106.5 is no longer needed.
VI. Final Action
On the basis of the above analysis and evaluation we conclude that
we can remove the provisions of section 106.5 from the SIP on the basis
that Texas replaced the PBR for concrete batch plants, which required
public notice, with a standard permit for concrete batch plants that
also requires public notice for concrete batch plants that are subject
to the standard permit.
We are publishing this rule without prior proposal because we view
this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments
are received. This rule will be effective on November 28, 2005 without
further notice unless we receive adverse comment by October 28, 2005.
If we receive adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in
the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take
effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so
at this time. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
[[Page 56569]]
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also
does not have federalism implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This
action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard,
and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
state to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 28, 2005. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon Monoxide,
Hydrocarbons, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen oxides,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 19, 2005.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS--Texas
0
2. The table in Sec. 52.2270(c) entitled ``EPA Approved Regulations in
the Texas SIP'' is amended under chapter 106, subchapter A, by removing
the entry for section 106.5, ``Public Notice.''
[FR Doc. 05-19358 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P