Office of Research and Development; Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods: Designation of a New Equivalent Method for PM10, 56684-56686 [05-19356]
Download as PDF
56684
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 28, 2005 / Notices
m. Locations of the Application: This
filing is available for review and
reproduction at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room, Room 2A, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
The filing may also be viewed on the
Web at https://www.ferc.gov using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket
number, here P–9699, in the docket
number field to access the document.
For assistance, call toll-free 1–866–208–
3676 or e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov. For TTY,
call (202) 502–8659.
n. Individuals desiring to be included
on the Commission’s mailing list should
so indicate by writing to the Secretary
of the Commission.
o. Comments, Protests, or Motions to
Intervene—Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to
intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214.
In determining the appropriate action to
take, the Commission will consider all
protests or other comments filed, but
only those who file a motion to
intervene in accordance with the
Commission’s Rules may become a
party to the proceeding. Any comments,
protests, or motions to intervene must
be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular
application.
p. Filing and Service of Responsive
Documents—Any filings must bear in
all capital letters the title
‘‘COMMENTS’’,
‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS
AND CONDITIONS’’, ‘‘PROTEST’’, or
‘‘MOTION TO INTERVENE’’, as
applicable, and the Project Number of
the particular application to which the
filing refers. A copy of any motion to
intervene must also be served upon each
representative of the Applicant
specified in the particular application.
q. Agency Comments—Federal, State,
and local agencies are invited to file
comments on the described application.
A copy of the application may be
obtained by agencies directly from the
Applicant. If an agency does not file
comments within the time specified for
filing comments, it will be presumed to
have no comments. One copy of an
agency’s comments must also be sent to
the Applicant’s representatives.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–5239 Filed 9–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:02 Sep 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No. 12514–000—Indiana]
Northern Indiana Public Service
Company; Norway and Oakdale
Hydroelectric Project; Notice of
Meeting To Discuss Project Boundary
Location
September 21, 2005.
a. Date and Time of Meeting: October
6, 2005 at 2 p.m. (EST).
b. Place: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission’s (FERC) Headquarters, 888
1st St, NE., Washington, DC 20426;
Room 62–22.
c. FERC Contact: Sergiu Serban at
(202) 502–6211, or
sergiu.serban@ferc.gov.
d. Purpose of Meeting: To discuss the
location of the project boundary in the
pending proceeding on the license
application for the Norway and Oakdale
Project. A summary of the meeting will
be placed in the project’s public record.
e. All local, State, and Federal
agencies, Indian tribes, and other
interested parties are invited to
participate either in person or by phone.
Please call Sergiu Serban at (202) 502–
6211 by October 4, 2005, to RSVP and
to receive specific instructions on how
to participate.
f. FERC conferences are accessible
under section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973. For accessibility
accommodations please send an e-mail
to accessibility@ferc.gov or call toll free
(866) 208–3372 (voice) or (202) 208–
1659 (TTY), or send a fax to (202) 208–
2106 with the required
accommodations.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–5269 Filed 9–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RP05–317–000]
Texas Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice
of Informal Settlement Conference
September 16, 2005.
Take notice that an informal
settlement conference will be convened
in this proceeding commencing at 10
a.m. (EST) on Tuesday, September 27,
2005, at the offices of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, for
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the purpose of exploring the possible
settlement of the above-referenced
docket.
Any party, as defined by 18 CFR
385.102(c), or any participant as defined
by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to
attend. Persons wishing to become a
party must move to intervene and
receive intervenor status pursuant to the
Commission’s regulations (18 CFR
385.214).
FERC conferences are accessible
under section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973. For accessibility
accommodations please send an e-mail
to accessibility@ferc.gov or call toll free
1–866–208–3372 (voice) or (202) 208–
1659 (TTY), or send a fax to (202) 208–
2106 with the required
accommodations.
For additional information, please
contact Bill Collins at (202) 502–8248,
william.collins@ferc.gov or Bob Keegan
at (202) 502–8158,
james.keegan@ferc.gov.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–5218 Filed 9–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–7976–4]
Office of Research and Development;
Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and
Equivalent Methods: Designation of a
New Equivalent Method for PM10
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of the designation of a
new equivalent method for monitoring
ambient air quality.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has designated, in accordance
with 40 CFR part 53, a new equivalent
method for measuring concentrations of
particulate matter as PM10 in the
ambient air.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Hunike, Human Exposure and
Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD–
D205–03), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711. Phone:
(919) 541–3737, e-mail:
Hunike.Elizabeth@epa.gov.
In
accordance with regulations at 40 CFR
part 53, the EPA evaluates various
methods for monitoring the
concentrations of those ambient air
pollutants for which EPA has
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 28, 2005 / Notices
established National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQSs) as set
forth in 40 CFR part 50. Monitoring
methods that are determined to meet
specific requirements for adequacy are
designated by the EPA as either
reference methods or equivalent
methods (as applicable), thereby
permitting their use under 40 CFR part
58 by States and other agencies for
determining attainment of the NAAQSs.
The EPA hereby announces the
designation of a new equivalent method
for measuring concentrations of
particulate matter as PM10 in ambient
air. This designation is made under the
provisions of 40 CFR part 53, as
amended on July 18, 1997 (62 FR
38764).
The new equivalent method for PM10
is an automated method (analyzer) that
utilizes a measurement principle based
on sample collection by filtration and
analysis by beta-ray attenuation. The
newly designated equivalent method is
identified as follows:
EQPM–0905–0156, ‘‘DKK–TOA Models
FPM–222, FPM–222C, FPM–223, FPM–
223C, DUB–222(S), and DUB–223(S)
Particulate Monitor’’ for monitoring
PM10 in Ambient Air (beta attenuation
monitor), configured for PM10, with
Firmware Version DUB4–658355,
Corrected Slope Factor (FACT SLOPE)
set to 1.232, Corrected Zero Value
(FACT ZERO) set to 1.8, and with or
without any of the following options:
Auto Check and Serial Recorder.
An application for an equivalent
method determination for this method
was received by the EPA on February
10, 2005. The method is available
commercially from the applicant, DKK–
TOA Corporation, 29–10, 1-Chome,
Takadanobaba, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo
169–8648, Japan (https://
www.toadkk.co.jp/).
Test analyzers representative of this
method have been tested by the
applicant in accordance with the
applicable test procedures specified in
40 CFR part 53 (as amended on July 18,
1997). After reviewing the results of
those tests and other information
submitted by the applicant, EPA has
determined, in accordance with part 53,
that this method should be designated
as an equivalent method. The
information submitted by the applicant
will be kept on file, either at EPA’s
National Exposure Research Laboratory,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711 or in an approved archive storage
facility, and will be available for
inspection (with advance notice) to the
extent consistent with 40 CFR part 2
(EPA’s regulations implementing the
Freedom of Information Act).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:02 Sep 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
As a designated reference or
equivalent method, this method is
acceptable for use by states and other air
monitoring agencies under the
requirements of 40 CFR part 58,
Ambient Air Quality Surveillance. For
such purposes, the method must be
used in strict accordance with the
operation or instruction manual
associated with the method and subject
to any specifications and limitations
(e.g., configuration or operational
settings) specified in the applicable
designation method description (see the
identification of the method above).
Users of the method should also note
that its equivalent method designation
applies only to 24-hour average PM10
concentration measurements. The DKK–
TOA Model FPM–222 and associated
model monitors can also provide
average PM10 concentration
measurements over other, shorter
averaging periods. However, such
shorter average concentration
measurements may be less precise than
the 24-hour measurements and are not
required for use in determining
attainment under the air quality
surveillance requirements of part 58
(although they may be useful for other
purposes). Use of the method should
also be in general accordance with the
guidance and recommendations of
applicable sections of the ‘‘Quality
Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume I,’’ EPA/
600/R–94/038a and ‘‘Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume II, Part
1,’’ EPA–454/R–98–004. Vendor
modifications of a designated reference
or equivalent method used for purposes
of part 58 are permitted only with prior
approval of the EPA, as provided in part
53. Provisions concerning modification
of such methods by users are specified
under Section 2.8 (Modifications of
Methods by Users) of Appendix C to 40
CFR part 58.
In general, a method designation
applies to any sampler or analyzer
which is identical to the sampler or
analyzer described in the application for
designation. In some cases, similar
samplers or analyzers manufactured
prior to the designation may be
upgraded or converted (e.g., by minor
modification or by substitution of the
approved operation or instruction
manual) so as to be identical to the
designated method and thus achieve
designated status. The manufacturer
should be consulted to determine the
feasibility of such upgrading or
conversion.
Part 53 requires that sellers of
designated reference or equivalent
method analyzers or samplers comply
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56685
with certain conditions. These
conditions are specified in 40 CFR 53.9
and are summarized below:
(a) A copy of the approved operation
or instruction manual must accompany
the sampler or analyzer when it is
delivered to the ultimate purchaser.
(b) The sampler or analyzer must not
generate any unreasonable hazard to
operators or to the environment.
(c) The sampler or analyzer must
function within the limits of the
applicable performance specifications
given in 40 CFR parts 50 and 53 for at
least one year after delivery when
maintained and operated in accordance
with the operation or instruction
manual.
(d) Any sampler or analyzer offered
for sale as part of a reference or
equivalent method must bear a label or
sticker indicating that it has been
designated as part of a reference or
equivalent method in accordance with
part 53 and showing its designated
method identification number.
(e) If such an analyzer has two or
more selectable ranges, the label or
sticker must be placed in close
proximity to the range selector and
indicate which range or ranges have
been included in the reference or
equivalent method designation.
(f) An applicant who offers samplers
or analyzers for sale as part of a
reference or equivalent method is
required to maintain a list of ultimate
purchasers of such samplers or
analyzers and to notify them within 30
days if a reference or equivalent method
designation applicable to the method
has been canceled or if adjustment of
the sampler or analyzer is necessary
under 40 CFR 53.11(b) to avoid a
cancellation.
(g) An applicant who modifies a
sampler or analyzer previously
designated as part of a reference or
equivalent method is not permitted to
sell the sampler or analyzer (as
modified) as part of a reference or
equivalent method (although it may be
sold without such representation), nor
to attach a designation label or sticker
to the sampler or analyzer (as modified)
under the provisions described above,
until the applicant has received notice
under 40 CFR 53.14(c) that the original
designation or a new designation
applies to the method as modified, or
until the applicant has applied for and
received notice under 40 CFR 53.8(b) of
a new reference or equivalent method
determination for the sampler or
analyzer as modified.
Aside from occasional breakdowns or
malfunctions, consistent or repeated
noncompliance with any of these
conditions should be reported to:
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
56686
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 28, 2005 / Notices
Director, Human Exposure and
Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD–
E205–01), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711.
Designation of this new equivalent
method is intended to assist the States
in establishing and operating their air
quality surveillance systems under 40
CFR part 58. Questions concerning the
commercial availability or technical
aspects of the method should be
directed to the applicant.
Lawrence W. Reiter,
Director, National Exposure Research
Laboratory.
[FR Doc. 05–19356 Filed 9–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–7976–3]
Clean Water Act; Contractor Access to
Confidential Business Information
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Intended Transfer of
Confidential Business Information to
Contractors and Subcontractors.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) intends to transfer
confidential business information (CBI)
collected from the drinking water
treatment industry, airport deicing
operations, and other industries to
Battelle and its subcontractors. Transfer
of the information will allow the
contractor and subcontractors to support
EPA in the planning, development, and
review of effluent limitations guidelines
and standards under the Clean Water
Act (CWA) and the development of
discharge standards for certain Alaskan
cruise ship operations. The information
being transferred was or will be
collected under the authority of section
308 of the CWA. Some information
being transferred from the pulp, paper,
and paperboard industry was collected
under the additional authorities of
section 114 of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
and section 3007 of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
Interested persons may submit
comments on this intended transfer of
information to the address noted below.
DATES: Comments on the transfer of data
are due October 3, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to
Mr. M. Ahmar Siddiqui, Document
Control Officer, Engineering and
Analysis Division (4303T), Room 6231S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:02 Sep 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
EPA West, U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20460.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
M. Ahmar Siddiqui, Document Control
Officer, at (202) 566–1044, or via e-mail
at siddiqui.ahmar@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has
transferred CBI to various contractors
and subcontractors over the history of
the effluent guidelines program. EPA
determined that this transfer was
necessary to enable the contractors and
subcontractors to perform their work in
supporting EPA in planning,
developing, and reviewing effluent
guidelines and standards for certain
industries.
Today, EPA is giving notice that it has
entered into a contract with Battelle,
number EP–C–05–030, located in
Columbus, Ohio. The reason for this
contract is to secure additional
statistical analysis support for EPA in its
development, review, implementation,
and defense of water-related initiatives.
To obtain assistance in responding to
this contract, Battelle has entered into
contracts with the following
subcontractors: Waterstone
Environmental Hydrology and
Engineering, Inc. (located in Boulder,
Colorado) and Jorge Scientific
Corporation (Arlington, Virginia).
All EPA contractor, subcontractor,
and consultant personnel are bound by
the requirements and sanctions
contained in their contracts with EPA
and in EPA’s confidentiality regulations
found at 40 CFR Part 2, Subpart B.
Battelle and its subcontractors adhere to
EPA-approved security plans which
describe procedures to protect CBI. The
procedures in these plans are applied to
CBI previously gathered by EPA for the
industries identified below and to CBI
that may be gathered in the future for
these industries. The security plans
specify that contractor and
subcontractor personnel are required to
sign non-disclosure agreements and are
briefed on appropriate security
procedures before they are permitted
access to CBI. No person is
automatically granted access to CBI: a
need to know must exist.
The information that will be
transferred to Battelle and its
subcontractors consists primarily of
information previously collected by
EPA to support the development and
review of effluent limitations guidelines
and standards under the CWA and the
development of discharge standards for
certain Alaskan cruise ship operations.
In particular, information, including
CBI, collected for the planning,
development, and review of effluent
limitations guidelines and standards for
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the following industries may be
transferred: Airport deicing;
aquaculture; concentrated animal
feeding operations; centralized waste
treatment; coal mining; drinking water
treatment; industrial container and
drum cleaning; industrial laundries;
industrial waste combustors; iron and
steel manufacturing; landfills; meat and
poultry products; metal finishing; metal
products and machinery; nonferrous
metals manufacturing; oil and gas
extraction (including coalbed methane);
ore mining and dressing; organic
chemicals, plastics, and synthetic fibers;
pesticide chemicals; pharmaceutical
manufacturing; petroleum refining;
pulp, paper, and paperboard
manufacturing; steam electric power
generation; textile mills; timber
products processing; tobacco; and
transportation equipment cleaning. In
addition, for the development of
standards for Alaskan cruise ships, EPA
may transfer information, including CBI,
about large cruise ships that operate in
the waters around Alaska.
EPA also intends to transfer to
Battelle and its subcontractors all
information listed in this notice, of the
type described above (including CBI)
that may be collected in the future
under the authority of section 308 of the
CWA or voluntarily submitted (e.g., in
comments in response to a Federal
Register notice), as is necessary to
enable Battelle and its subcontractors to
carry out the work required by their
contracts to support EPA’s effluent
guidelines planning process, the
development of effluent limitations
guidelines and standards, and the
development of discharge standards for
cruise ships.
Dated: September 21, 2005.
Pamela Barr,
Acting Director, Office of Science and
Technology.
[FR Doc. 05–19355 Filed 9–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–7976–1]
Good Neighbor Environmental Board
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, Pub. L. 92463, EPA
gives notice of a meeting of the Good
Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB).
The Board provides advice and
recommendations to the U.S. President
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56684-56686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19356]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-7976-4]
Office of Research and Development; Ambient Air Monitoring
Reference and Equivalent Methods: Designation of a New Equivalent
Method for PM10
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice of the designation of a new equivalent method for
monitoring ambient air quality.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has designated, in accordance with 40 CFR part 53, a new
equivalent method for measuring concentrations of particulate matter as
PM10 in the ambient air.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Hunike, Human Exposure and
Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-D205-03), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
Phone: (919) 541-3737, e-mail: Hunike.Elizabeth@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with regulations at 40 CFR
part 53, the EPA evaluates various methods for monitoring the
concentrations of those ambient air pollutants for which EPA has
[[Page 56685]]
established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQSs) as set
forth in 40 CFR part 50. Monitoring methods that are determined to meet
specific requirements for adequacy are designated by the EPA as either
reference methods or equivalent methods (as applicable), thereby
permitting their use under 40 CFR part 58 by States and other agencies
for determining attainment of the NAAQSs.
The EPA hereby announces the designation of a new equivalent method
for measuring concentrations of particulate matter as PM10
in ambient air. This designation is made under the provisions of 40 CFR
part 53, as amended on July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38764).
The new equivalent method for PM10 is an automated
method (analyzer) that utilizes a measurement principle based on sample
collection by filtration and analysis by beta-ray attenuation. The
newly designated equivalent method is identified as follows:
EQPM-0905-0156, ``DKK-TOA Models FPM-222, FPM-222C, FPM-223, FPM-223C,
DUB-222(S), and DUB-223(S) Particulate Monitor'' for monitoring
PM10 in Ambient Air (beta attenuation monitor), configured
for PM10, with Firmware Version DUB4-658355, Corrected Slope
Factor (FACT SLOPE) set to 1.232, Corrected Zero Value (FACT ZERO) set
to 1.8, and with or without any of the following options: Auto Check
and Serial Recorder.
An application for an equivalent method determination for this
method was received by the EPA on February 10, 2005. The method is
available commercially from the applicant, DKK-TOA Corporation, 29-10,
1-Chome, Takadanobaba, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo 169-8648, Japan (https://
www.toadkk.co.jp/).
Test analyzers representative of this method have been tested by
the applicant in accordance with the applicable test procedures
specified in 40 CFR part 53 (as amended on July 18, 1997). After
reviewing the results of those tests and other information submitted by
the applicant, EPA has determined, in accordance with part 53, that
this method should be designated as an equivalent method. The
information submitted by the applicant will be kept on file, either at
EPA's National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina 27711 or in an approved archive storage facility, and
will be available for inspection (with advance notice) to the extent
consistent with 40 CFR part 2 (EPA's regulations implementing the
Freedom of Information Act).
As a designated reference or equivalent method, this method is
acceptable for use by states and other air monitoring agencies under
the requirements of 40 CFR part 58, Ambient Air Quality Surveillance.
For such purposes, the method must be used in strict accordance with
the operation or instruction manual associated with the method and
subject to any specifications and limitations (e.g., configuration or
operational settings) specified in the applicable designation method
description (see the identification of the method above).
Users of the method should also note that its equivalent method
designation applies only to 24-hour average PM10
concentration measurements. The DKK-TOA Model FPM-222 and associated
model monitors can also provide average PM10 concentration
measurements over other, shorter averaging periods. However, such
shorter average concentration measurements may be less precise than the
24-hour measurements and are not required for use in determining
attainment under the air quality surveillance requirements of part 58
(although they may be useful for other purposes). Use of the method
should also be in general accordance with the guidance and
recommendations of applicable sections of the ``Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume I,'' EPA/600/R-
94/038a and ``Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement
Systems, Volume II, Part 1,'' EPA-454/R-98-004. Vendor modifications of
a designated reference or equivalent method used for purposes of part
58 are permitted only with prior approval of the EPA, as provided in
part 53. Provisions concerning modification of such methods by users
are specified under Section 2.8 (Modifications of Methods by Users) of
Appendix C to 40 CFR part 58.
In general, a method designation applies to any sampler or analyzer
which is identical to the sampler or analyzer described in the
application for designation. In some cases, similar samplers or
analyzers manufactured prior to the designation may be upgraded or
converted (e.g., by minor modification or by substitution of the
approved operation or instruction manual) so as to be identical to the
designated method and thus achieve designated status. The manufacturer
should be consulted to determine the feasibility of such upgrading or
conversion.
Part 53 requires that sellers of designated reference or equivalent
method analyzers or samplers comply with certain conditions. These
conditions are specified in 40 CFR 53.9 and are summarized below:
(a) A copy of the approved operation or instruction manual must
accompany the sampler or analyzer when it is delivered to the ultimate
purchaser.
(b) The sampler or analyzer must not generate any unreasonable
hazard to operators or to the environment.
(c) The sampler or analyzer must function within the limits of the
applicable performance specifications given in 40 CFR parts 50 and 53
for at least one year after delivery when maintained and operated in
accordance with the operation or instruction manual.
(d) Any sampler or analyzer offered for sale as part of a reference
or equivalent method must bear a label or sticker indicating that it
has been designated as part of a reference or equivalent method in
accordance with part 53 and showing its designated method
identification number.
(e) If such an analyzer has two or more selectable ranges, the
label or sticker must be placed in close proximity to the range
selector and indicate which range or ranges have been included in the
reference or equivalent method designation.
(f) An applicant who offers samplers or analyzers for sale as part
of a reference or equivalent method is required to maintain a list of
ultimate purchasers of such samplers or analyzers and to notify them
within 30 days if a reference or equivalent method designation
applicable to the method has been canceled or if adjustment of the
sampler or analyzer is necessary under 40 CFR 53.11(b) to avoid a
cancellation.
(g) An applicant who modifies a sampler or analyzer previously
designated as part of a reference or equivalent method is not permitted
to sell the sampler or analyzer (as modified) as part of a reference or
equivalent method (although it may be sold without such
representation), nor to attach a designation label or sticker to the
sampler or analyzer (as modified) under the provisions described above,
until the applicant has received notice under 40 CFR 53.14(c) that the
original designation or a new designation applies to the method as
modified, or until the applicant has applied for and received notice
under 40 CFR 53.8(b) of a new reference or equivalent method
determination for the sampler or analyzer as modified.
Aside from occasional breakdowns or malfunctions, consistent or
repeated noncompliance with any of these conditions should be reported
to:
[[Page 56686]]
Director, Human Exposure and Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-E205-
01), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
Designation of this new equivalent method is intended to assist the
States in establishing and operating their air quality surveillance
systems under 40 CFR part 58. Questions concerning the commercial
availability or technical aspects of the method should be directed to
the applicant.
Lawrence W. Reiter,
Director, National Exposure Research Laboratory.
[FR Doc. 05-19356 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P