Notice of Availability (NOA) for the Record of Decision (ROD) for Activities Associated With Future Programs at the U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground (DPG), Utah, 56444-56445 [05-19246]
Download as PDF
56444
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 27, 2005 / Notices
the orders (57 FR 57420 (December 4,
1992)). Moreover, as a result of a
changed circumstances review, the
Department revoked the orders in part
with respect to certain stainless steel
camping ware: (1) made of single–ply
stainless steel having a thickness no
greater than 6.0 millimeters; and (2)
consisting of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 quart
saucepans without handles and with
lids that also serve as fry pans (62 FR
3662 (January 24, 1997)).
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
Orders on Top–of-the–Stove Stainless
Steel Cooking Ware from the Republic
of Korea and Taiwan (‘‘Decision
Memorandum’’) from Barbara E.
Tillman, Acting Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, to
Joseph A. Spetrini, Acting Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration,
dated September 27, 2005, which is
hereby adopted by this notice. The
issues discussed in the Decision
Memorandum include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and the magnitude of the margins likely
to prevail if the orders were to be
revoked. Parties can find a complete
discussion of all issues raised in these
reviews and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum which is on file in room
B–099 of the main Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. The paper
copy and electronic version of the
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Reviews
We determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on cooking
ware from Korea and Taiwan would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping at the following
weighted–average percentage margins:
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers
Weighted–Average
Margin (percent)
Korea.
Bum Koo Industrial Co.,
Ltd. ............................
Dae Sung Industrial
Co., Ltd. ....................
Hai Dong Stainless Industries, Co. ..............
Kyung Dong Industrial
Co., Ltd. ....................
Namil Metal Co. Ltd. .....
All Others ......................
Taiwan.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Sep 26, 2005
*31.23
6.11
12.14
8.36
0.75
8.10
Jkt 205001
measures as well as measures described
in the ROD to mitigate potential
environmental and socioeconomic
Golden Lion Metal Inimpacts caused by the Proposed Action.
dustry Co., Ltd. .........
15.08
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the
Lyi Mean Industrial Co.,
Ltd. ............................
26.10 ROD may be submitted to: U.S. Army
Dugway Proving Ground, ATTN: CSTE–
Song Far Industry Co.,
Ltd. ............................
25.90 DTC–DP–PA (Paula Nicholson),
All Others ......................
22.61 Dugway, UT 84022–5000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
This notice also serves as the only
Paula Nicholson at (435) 831–3409 or by
reminder to parties subject to
e-mail at nicholsn@dpg.army.mil.
administrative protective orders
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EIS
(‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility
was prepared to address the planned
concerning the return or destruction of
mission at DPG, the reasonable
proprietary information disclosed under
alternatives to the planned mission, and
APO in accordance with 19 CFR
potential environmental impacts of
351.305. Timely notification of the
DPG’s future operations.
return or destruction of APO materials
DPG is one of the few Army
or conversion to judicial protective
installations large and remote enough to
orders is hereby requested. Failure to
permit comprehensive and realistic
comply with the regulations and terms
testing of biological and chemical
of an APO is a violation which is subject
defense systems, munitions and smokes,
to sanction.
obscurants, and illuminants with a
We are issuing and publishing these
commitment to environmental
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the protection and personal and public
safety. Both DoD and non-DOD
Act.
customers are posing challenges for DPG
Dated: September 20, 2005.
to support greater numbers of test and
Joseph A. Spetrini,
training events related to new enemy
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
threats, next generation materiel,
Administration.
advanced conventional weapon
[FR Doc. 05–19275 Filed 9–26–05; 8:45 am]
systems, environmental concern, and
Billing Code: 3510–DS–S
demilitarization technologies.
The Proposed Action described and
evaluated in the EIS is the
implementation of DPG’s planned
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
mission. It includes continuation of
Department of the Army
existing DPG activities (including, but
not limited to, chemical and biological
Notice of Availability (NOA) for the
defense testing, other testing programs,
Record of Decision (ROD) for Activities training, real property management, and
Associated With Future Programs at
environmental management) with future
the U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground increases in most testing and training
(DPG), Utah
operating areas. Additionally, the
Proposed Action includes
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.
diversification of DPG’s operations and
ACTION: Record of decision.
implementation of a Summary
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army
Development Plan identifying real
announces the availability of its Record
property planning recommendations for
of Decision (ROD) for Activities
DPG. The Proposed Action will enable
Associated with Future Programs at the
DPG to effectively respond to the
U.S. Army DPG. The ROD describes the challenges of a growing and diversified
Army’s decisions with respect to the
mission.
Proposed Action (implementation of
In making its decision, the Army
DPG’s planned mission for a 7-year time considered the results of the analysis in
frame) and alternatives considered in
the EIS, including the evaluation of the
the Environmental Impact Statement
other alternatives. The EIS considered
(EIS) and its rationale for the decision.
the following two alternatives to the
Based on the EIS and other relevant
Proposed Action and the No Action
factors, the Army has decided to
Alternative: (1) Decreased mission with
implement its Proposed Action. The
a major reduction in operations at DPG
Proposed Action is the alternative that
and (2) a maximum expanded mission
best fulfills DPG’s statutory mission and with major increases in most operating
responsibilities, giving consideration to
areas compared to current operations.
economic, environmental, technical,
The No Action Alternative represents
and other factors. DPG will continue to
the status quo and assumes that existing
implement its existing mitigation
DPG operations would continue at
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Weighted–Average
Margin (percent)
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 27, 2005 / Notices
approximately their current rates into
the foreseeable future. All comments
provided during the formal public
review and comment periods were also
considered, as well as national security
and mission requirements.
The consideration of future programs
ensures that the general type and
intensity of most of DPG’s future
activities were addressed. A range of
factors such as future technology
developments, available budgets, and
changing defense threats often alter test
plans. The Proposed Action within the
Future Programs EIS includes only
those activities that are reasonably
foreseeable and for which DPG is the
proponent or can make a decision about
the activity. Specific program
designations and equipment/materials
to be tested may change between the
time that the EIS was prepared and the
actual test date. Accordingly, the EIS
identifies the general characteristics of
reasonably foreseeable test programs,
rather than providing definitive and
specific test information.
DPG will continue to implement its
existing mitigation measures, as well as
measures described in the ROD, to
mitigate potential environmental and
socioeconomic impacts caused by the
Proposed Action. DPG and the Army are
committed to protecting human health,
sustaining their environments, and
maintaining regulatory compliance.
Copies of the ROD and the Final EIS
are available for review purposes only
(no extra copies of the documents will
be available at these locations) at the
following libraries: Whitmore Library,
2197 East 7000 South (Ft. Union Blvd.),
Salt Lake City; University of Utah, J.
Willard Marriott Library, 15th East and
South Campus Drive, Salt Lake City;
Dugway Public Library, 5124 Kister
Avenue, Dugway; Tooele City Public
Library, 128 W. Vine Street, Tooele.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: On 02 September 2005, in
accordance with PL 104–106, Title
XXIX, Subtitle A, entitled ‘‘Illinois Land
Conservation Act of 1995’’, the
Department of the Army signed a
Secretariat Memorandum to transfer
approximately 2,640 Acres of land at
Joliet Army Ammunition Plant, Illinois
to the Department of Agriculture for use
by the Forest Service as the Midewin
National Tallgrass Prairie. The purpose
of this notice is to effect that transfer
pursuant to the provisions of Section
2912(e)(2) of PL 104–106.
This is a partial transfer of the entire
acreage contemplated by the statute.
Additional transfers will be made in the
future. A map entitled ‘‘2004 USDA
Assignment Parcel Locator Map’’ and
legal descriptions of the MFG area
revised 18 January 2005 and of the LAP
area revised 11 August 2005 of the
property which is the subject of the
partial transfer are on file with the U.S.
Army Engineer District, Corps of
Engineers, Louisville, Kentucky and the
Office of the Regional Forester, USDA,
Forest Service.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Albert J. Edwardo, 502–315–6969.
ADDRESSES: Documents are on file at
locations:
1. U.S. Army Engineer District,
Louisville, Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box
59, Louisville, Kentucky 40201–0059.
2. Office of the Regional Forester,
USDA, Forest Service, 626 East
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 800,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Michael G. Barter,
Chief, Real Estate Division.
[FR Doc. 05–19217 Filed 9–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–92–P
Dated: September 22, 2005.
Daphne Kamely,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the
Army, (Environment, Safety and
Occupational Health), OASA(I&E).
[FR Doc. 05–19246 Filed 9–26–05; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
BILLING CODE 3710–08–M
AGENCY:
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Transfer of Jurisdiction of a Portion of
Joliet Army Ammunition Plant to the
Department of Agriculture for the
Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DoD.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Sep 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Inland Waterways Users Board
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
AGENCY:
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
SUMMARY: In Accordance with 10(a)(2)
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463), announcement is
made of the forthcoming meeting.
Name of Committee: Inland
Waterways Users Board (Board).
Date: October 13, 2005.
Location: Heathman Lodge, 7801 NE
Greenwood Drive, Vancouver,
Washington 98662, (1–360–254–3100).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56445
Time: Registration will begin at 8:30
a.m. and the meeting is scheduled to
adjourn at 12 p.m.
Agenda: The Board will hear briefings
on the status of both the funding for
inland navigation projects and studies,
and the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
The Board will also consider its
priorities for the next fiscal year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Norman T. Edwards, Headquarters, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, CEMP–POD,
441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC
20314–1000; Ph: 202–761–1934.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public. Any
interested person may attend, appear
before, or file statement with the
committee at the time and in the
manner permitted by the committee.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–19270 Filed 9–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–92–M
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Department of Education.
The Leader, Information
Management Case Services Team,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of the Chief Information
Officer invites comments on the
submission for OMB review as required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before October
27, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Rachel Potter, Desk Officer,
Department of Education, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW., Room 10222, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503 or faxed to (202) 395–6974.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56444-56445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19246]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Notice of Availability (NOA) for the Record of Decision (ROD) for
Activities Associated With Future Programs at the U.S. Army Dugway
Proving Ground (DPG), Utah
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.
ACTION: Record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the availability of its
Record of Decision (ROD) for Activities Associated with Future Programs
at the U.S. Army DPG. The ROD describes the Army's decisions with
respect to the Proposed Action (implementation of DPG's planned mission
for a 7-year time frame) and alternatives considered in the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and its rationale for the
decision. Based on the EIS and other relevant factors, the Army has
decided to implement its Proposed Action. The Proposed Action is the
alternative that best fulfills DPG's statutory mission and
responsibilities, giving consideration to economic, environmental,
technical, and other factors. DPG will continue to implement its
existing mitigation measures as well as measures described in the ROD
to mitigate potential environmental and socioeconomic impacts caused by
the Proposed Action.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the ROD may be submitted to: U.S.
Army Dugway Proving Ground, ATTN: CSTE-DTC-DP-PA (Paula Nicholson),
Dugway, UT 84022-5000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula Nicholson at (435) 831-3409
or by e-mail at nicholsn@dpg.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EIS was prepared to address the planned
mission at DPG, the reasonable alternatives to the planned mission, and
potential environmental impacts of DPG's future operations.
DPG is one of the few Army installations large and remote enough to
permit comprehensive and realistic testing of biological and chemical
defense systems, munitions and smokes, obscurants, and illuminants with
a commitment to environmental protection and personal and public
safety. Both DoD and non-DOD customers are posing challenges for DPG to
support greater numbers of test and training events related to new
enemy threats, next generation materiel, advanced conventional weapon
systems, environmental concern, and demilitarization technologies.
The Proposed Action described and evaluated in the EIS is the
implementation of DPG's planned mission. It includes continuation of
existing DPG activities (including, but not limited to, chemical and
biological defense testing, other testing programs, training, real
property management, and environmental management) with future
increases in most testing and training operating areas. Additionally,
the Proposed Action includes diversification of DPG's operations and
implementation of a Summary Development Plan identifying real property
planning recommendations for DPG. The Proposed Action will enable DPG
to effectively respond to the challenges of a growing and diversified
mission.
In making its decision, the Army considered the results of the
analysis in the EIS, including the evaluation of the other
alternatives. The EIS considered the following two alternatives to the
Proposed Action and the No Action Alternative: (1) Decreased mission
with a major reduction in operations at DPG and (2) a maximum expanded
mission with major increases in most operating areas compared to
current operations. The No Action Alternative represents the status quo
and assumes that existing DPG operations would continue at
[[Page 56445]]
approximately their current rates into the foreseeable future. All
comments provided during the formal public review and comment periods
were also considered, as well as national security and mission
requirements.
The consideration of future programs ensures that the general type
and intensity of most of DPG's future activities were addressed. A
range of factors such as future technology developments, available
budgets, and changing defense threats often alter test plans. The
Proposed Action within the Future Programs EIS includes only those
activities that are reasonably foreseeable and for which DPG is the
proponent or can make a decision about the activity. Specific program
designations and equipment/materials to be tested may change between
the time that the EIS was prepared and the actual test date.
Accordingly, the EIS identifies the general characteristics of
reasonably foreseeable test programs, rather than providing definitive
and specific test information.
DPG will continue to implement its existing mitigation measures, as
well as measures described in the ROD, to mitigate potential
environmental and socioeconomic impacts caused by the Proposed Action.
DPG and the Army are committed to protecting human health, sustaining
their environments, and maintaining regulatory compliance.
Copies of the ROD and the Final EIS are available for review
purposes only (no extra copies of the documents will be available at
these locations) at the following libraries: Whitmore Library, 2197
East 7000 South (Ft. Union Blvd.), Salt Lake City; University of Utah,
J. Willard Marriott Library, 15th East and South Campus Drive, Salt
Lake City; Dugway Public Library, 5124 Kister Avenue, Dugway; Tooele
City Public Library, 128 W. Vine Street, Tooele.
Dated: September 22, 2005.
Daphne Kamely,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army, (Environment, Safety and
Occupational Health), OASA(I&E).
[FR Doc. 05-19246 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M