Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A318-100 and A319-100 Series Airplanes; A320-111 Airplanes; A320-200 Series Airplanes; and A321-100 and A321-200 Series Airplanes, 56381-56383 [05-19232]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22528; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–125–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A318–100 and A319–100 Series
Airplanes; A320–111 Airplanes; A320–
200 Series Airplanes; and A321–100
and A321–200 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A318–100 and
A319–100 series airplanes; A320–111
airplanes; A320–200 series airplanes;
and A321–100 and A321–200 series
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require a one-time inspection of the
horizontal hinge pin of the 103VU
electrical panel in the avionics
compartment to determine if the hinge
pin can move out of the hinge, and
related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. This proposed AD
results from a report indicating that
electrical wire damage was found in the
103VU electrical panel due to contact
between the hinge pin and the adjacent
electrical wire harness. We are
proposing this AD to prevent contact
between the horizontal hinge pin and
the adjacent electrical wire harness,
which could result in damage to
electrical wires, and consequent arcing
and/or failure of associated systems.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by October 27, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:24 Sep 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France,
for service information identified in this
proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2141;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2005–22528; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–125–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Discussion
´ ´
The Direction Generale de l’Aviation
Civile (DGAC), which is the
airworthiness authority for France,
notified the FAA that an unsafe
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56381
condition may exist on certain Airbus
Model A318–100 and A319–100 series
airplanes; A320–111 airplanes; A320–
200 series airplanes; and A321–100 and
A321–200 series airplanes. The DGAC
advises that electrical wire damage was
found in the 103VU electrical panel,
which is located in the avionics
compartment. Investigation revealed
contact between the horizontal hinge
pin and an adjacent electrical wire
harness, due to migration of the hinge
pin. This condition, if not corrected,
could result in damage to electrical
wires, and consequent arcing and/or
failure of associated systems.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued All Operators Telex
(AOT) 25A1440, dated February 15,
2005. The AOT describes procedures for
inspecting the 103VU electrical panel
horizontal hinge pin to determine if the
pin can move out of the hinge. If there
is no hinge movement, the AOT states
that no further action is required. If
there is movement, the AOT states that
operators should do the related
investigative action of inspecting for
damage to the adjacent electrical
harness, and do all necessary corrective
actions. The corrective actions include
reworking the hinge, and repairing any
damage to the electrical harness.
Accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information is intended to
adequately address the unsafe
condition. The DGAC mandated the
AOT and issued French airworthiness
directive F–2005–052 R1, dated April
13, 2005, to ensure the continued
airworthiness of these airplanes in
France.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
These airplane models are
manufactured in France and are type
certificated for operation in the United
States under the provisions of section
21.29 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the
applicable bilateral airworthiness
agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral
airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has
kept the FAA informed of the situation
described above. We have examined the
DGAC’s findings, evaluated all pertinent
information, and determined that we
need to issue an AD for products of this
type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are issuing this AD to
require accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information
described previously.
E:\FR\FM\27SEP1.SGM
27SEP1
56382
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Clarification of Inspection Language
movement. This proposed AD defines
that inspection as a ‘‘general visual
inspection.’’ This inspection is defined
in Note 1 of this AD.
The service bulletin and the French
airworthiness directive request that
operators ‘‘inspect’’ for hinge pin
Costs of Compliance
The following table provides the
estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this proposed AD.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Work hours
Average
labor rate
per hour
Parts
Cost per
airplane
Number of
U.S.-registered
airplanes
Fleet cost
Inspection ..............................................................................
1
$65
None ....
$65
696
$45,240
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:24 Sep 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2005–22528;
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–125–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by October 27, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A318–
111 and –112; A319–111, –112, –113, –114,
–115, –131, –132, and –133; A320–111, –211,
–212, –214, –231, –232, and –233; and A321–
111, –112, –131, –211 and –231 airplanes;
certificated in any category; serial numbers
(S/Ns) 1 through 2396 inclusive, except S/Ns
2104, 2143, 2248, 2270, 2347, 2366, 2372,
2376, 2384, 2386, 2388, 2390, 2391, 2393,
and 2395.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report indicating
that electrical wire damage was found in the
103VU electrical panel due to contact
between the hinge pin and the adjacent
electrical wire harness. The FAA is issuing
this AD to prevent contact between the
horizontal hinge pin and the adjacent
electrical wire harness, which could result in
damage to electrical wires, and consequent
arcing and/or failure of associated systems.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspections and Corrective Actions
(f) Within 600 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, do a general visual
inspection of the horizontal hinge pin of the
103VU electrical panel in the avionics
compartment to determine if the pin can
move out of the hinge, and do any applicable
related investigative and corrective actions,
including repair of any damaged electrical
wires, before further flight. Do all the actions
in accordance with Airbus All Operators
Telex 25A1440, dated February 15, 2005.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
general visual inspection is: ‘‘A visual
examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious
damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of
inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror
may be necessary to ensure visual access to
all surfaces in the inspection area. This level
of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as
daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
droplight and may require removal or
opening of access panels or doors. Stands,
ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.’’
No Reporting
(g) Although All Operators Telex 25A1440,
dated February 15, 2005, specifies that
operators should send the results of
inspections to the manufacturer, that action
is not required by this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Related Information
(i) French airworthiness directive F–2005–
052 R1, dated April 13, 2005, also addresses
the subject of this AD.
E:\FR\FM\27SEP1.SGM
27SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 16, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–19232 Filed 9–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22529; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–099–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 767–200, –300, and –300F Series
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to
supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) that applies to certain
Boeing Model 767–200, –300, and
–300F series airplanes. The existing AD
currently requires repetitive inspections
of the lubrication passage and link
assembly joint in the inboard and
outboard flaps of the trailing edge for
discrepancies, and corrective action if
necessary. This proposed AD would
require new inspections for cracking or
severe wear of the bearings of the link
assembly, and corrective actions if
necessary. This proposed AD would
also require inspecting any link
assembly not previously inspected for
damage and replacing it with a new
assembly if necessary. This proposed
AD also ends the existing repetitive
inspections for certain airplanes, and
extends the repetitive interval for the
existing repetitive inspections and the
compliance time for the corrective
action on certain other airplanes. This
proposed AD also provides an optional
terminating action that would end the
repetitive inspections. This proposed
AD results from additional reports
indicating fractured bearings of the link
assembly joint in the inboard and
outboard flaps of the trailing edge. We
are proposing this AD to prevent failure
of the bearings in the link assembly
joint, which could result in separation
of the inboard or outboard flap and
consequent loss of control of the
airplane.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:24 Sep 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 14,
2005.
DATES:
Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207, for service
information identified in this proposed
AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Candice Gerretsen, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055–4056; telephone
(425) 917–6428; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Include the
docket number ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2005–
22529; Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–
099–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56383
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or may can visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Discussion
On January 16, 2002, we issued AD
2002–01–15, amendment 39–12609 (67
FR 4328, January 30, 2002), for certain
Boeing Model 767–200, –300, and
–300F series airplanes. That AD requires
repetitive inspections of the lubrication
passage and link assembly joint in the
inboard and outboard flaps of the
trailing edge for discrepancies, and
corrective action if necessary. That AD
resulted from reports of fractured
bearings and blocked lubrication
passages of the link assembly joint in
the inboard and outboard flaps of the
trailing edge. We issued that AD to
prevent failure of the bearings in the
link assembly joint, which could result
in separation of the outboard flap and
consequent loss of control of the
airplane.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
The preamble to AD 2002–01–15
explains that we consider the
requirements ‘‘interim action’’ and were
considering further rulemaking. We now
have determined that further
rulemaking is indeed necessary, and
this proposed AD follows from that
determination.
Since we issued AD 2002–01–15, we
have received reports of numerous
additional incidents of fractured
bearings of the link assembly joint in the
inboard and outboard flaps of the
trailing edge. In several of these
additional incidents, the bearings were
properly lubricated. Metallurgical
examination of fractured bearings
indicated environmentally assisted
cracking.
These additional incidents support
the data referenced in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
AD 2002–01–15 that indicate that
bearings of the link assembly joint may
fail even when they are properly
lubricated. However, paragraph (b)(1) of
E:\FR\FM\27SEP1.SGM
27SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56381-56383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19232]
[[Page 56381]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-22528; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-125-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A318-100 and A319-100
Series Airplanes; A320-111 Airplanes; A320-200 Series Airplanes; and
A321-100 and A321-200 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Airbus Model A318-100 and A319-100 series airplanes; A320-
111 airplanes; A320-200 series airplanes; and A321-100 and A321-200
series airplanes. This proposed AD would require a one-time inspection
of the horizontal hinge pin of the 103VU electrical panel in the
avionics compartment to determine if the hinge pin can move out of the
hinge, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary.
This proposed AD results from a report indicating that electrical wire
damage was found in the 103VU electrical panel due to contact between
the hinge pin and the adjacent electrical wire harness. We are
proposing this AD to prevent contact between the horizontal hinge pin
and the adjacent electrical wire harness, which could result in damage
to electrical wires, and consequent arcing and/or failure of associated
systems.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 27,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France, for service information identified in this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2141; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2005-
22528; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-125-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after the Docket Management System
receives them.
Discussion
The Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC), which is the
airworthiness authority for France, notified the FAA that an unsafe
condition may exist on certain Airbus Model A318-100 and A319-100
series airplanes; A320-111 airplanes; A320-200 series airplanes; and
A321-100 and A321-200 series airplanes. The DGAC advises that
electrical wire damage was found in the 103VU electrical panel, which
is located in the avionics compartment. Investigation revealed contact
between the horizontal hinge pin and an adjacent electrical wire
harness, due to migration of the hinge pin. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in damage to electrical wires, and consequent
arcing and/or failure of associated systems.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued All Operators Telex (AOT) 25A1440, dated February
15, 2005. The AOT describes procedures for inspecting the 103VU
electrical panel horizontal hinge pin to determine if the pin can move
out of the hinge. If there is no hinge movement, the AOT states that no
further action is required. If there is movement, the AOT states that
operators should do the related investigative action of inspecting for
damage to the adjacent electrical harness, and do all necessary
corrective actions. The corrective actions include reworking the hinge,
and repairing any damage to the electrical harness. Accomplishing the
actions specified in the service information is intended to adequately
address the unsafe condition. The DGAC mandated the AOT and issued
French airworthiness directive F-2005-052 R1, dated April 13, 2005, to
ensure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in France.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
These airplane models are manufactured in France and are type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. We have examined the DGAC's findings,
evaluated all pertinent information, and determined that we need to
issue an AD for products of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are issuing this AD to require accomplishing the
actions specified in the service information described previously.
[[Page 56382]]
Clarification of Inspection Language
The service bulletin and the French airworthiness directive request
that operators ``inspect'' for hinge pin movement. This proposed AD
defines that inspection as a ``general visual inspection.'' This
inspection is defined in Note 1 of this AD.
Costs of Compliance
The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators
to comply with this proposed AD.
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Average Cost per U.S.-
Action Work hours labor rate Parts airplane registered Fleet cost
per hour airplanes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection................... 1 $65 None....... $65 696 $45,240
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2005-22528; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-
125-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by October
27, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A318-111 and -112; A319-111,
-112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133; A320-111, -211, -212,
-214, -231, -232, and -233; and A321-111, -112, -131, -211 and -231
airplanes; certificated in any category; serial numbers (S/Ns) 1
through 2396 inclusive, except S/Ns 2104, 2143, 2248, 2270, 2347,
2366, 2372, 2376, 2384, 2386, 2388, 2390, 2391, 2393, and 2395.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report indicating that electrical
wire damage was found in the 103VU electrical panel due to contact
between the hinge pin and the adjacent electrical wire harness. The
FAA is issuing this AD to prevent contact between the horizontal
hinge pin and the adjacent electrical wire harness, which could
result in damage to electrical wires, and consequent arcing and/or
failure of associated systems.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspections and Corrective Actions
(f) Within 600 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
do a general visual inspection of the horizontal hinge pin of the
103VU electrical panel in the avionics compartment to determine if
the pin can move out of the hinge, and do any applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, including repair of any
damaged electrical wires, before further flight. Do all the actions
in accordance with Airbus All Operators Telex 25A1440, dated
February 15, 2005.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or
irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to
ensure visual access to all surfaces in the inspection area. This
level of inspection is made under normally available lighting
conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
droplight and may require removal or opening of access panels or
doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.''
No Reporting
(g) Although All Operators Telex 25A1440, dated February 15,
2005, specifies that operators should send the results of
inspections to the manufacturer, that action is not required by this
AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Related Information
(i) French airworthiness directive F-2005-052 R1, dated April
13, 2005, also addresses the subject of this AD.
[[Page 56383]]
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 16, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-19232 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P