2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment Program, 56113-56119 [05-19127]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
dairy farmers described in § 1033.12(b))
and handlers described in § 1000.9(c), as
reported in § 1033.30(a), is not less than
40 percent of the milk received from
dairy farmers, including milk diverted
pursuant to § 1033.13, subject to the
following conditions:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) A plant located in the marketing
area and operated by a cooperative
association if, during the months of
December through July 30 percent,
during the month of August 35 percent
and during the months of September
through November 40 percent or more
of the producer milk of members of the
association is delivered to a distributing
pool plant(s) or to a nonpool plant(s)
and classified as Class I. Deliveries for
qualification purposes may be made
directly from the farm or by transfer
from such association’s plant, subject to
the following conditions:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) The 30 percent delivery
requirement for the months of December
through July may be met for the current
month or it may be met on the basis of
deliveries during the preceding 12month period ending with the current
month.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) The aggregate monthly quantity
supplied by all parties to such an
agreement as a percentage of the
producer milk receipts included in the
unit during the months of August
through November is not less than 45
percent and during the months of
December through July is not less than
35 percent;
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. Section 1033.13 is amended by:
I (a) Revising paragraph (d)(4).
I (b) Adding paragraph (e).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 1033.13
Producer milk.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) Of the total quantity of producer
milk received during the month
(including diversions but excluding the
quantity of producer milk received from
a handler described in § 1000.9(c) or
which is diverted to another pool plant),
the handler diverted to nonpool plants
not more than 50 percent in each of the
months of August through February and
60 percent in each of the months of
March through July.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Producer milk shall not include
milk of a producer that is subject to
inclusion and participation in a
marketwide equalization pool under a
milk classification and pricing plan
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:27 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
imposed under the authority of another
government entity.
Dated: September 20, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–19086 Filed 9–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
7 CFR Part 1430
RIN 0560–AH28
2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance
Payment Program
AGENCIES: Commodity Credit
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This rule sets forth the
regulations for the 2004 Dairy Disaster
Assistance Payment Program. This
program will assist dairy producers by
providing payments to those who
suffered dairy production and milk
spoilage losses due to hurricanes in
2004.
DATES: This rule is effective on
September 26, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Danielle Cooke, Price Support Division,
Farm Service Agency, United States
Department of Agriculture, STOP 0512,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0512.
Telephone: (202) 720–1919; e-mail:
Danielle.Cooke@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion of Final Rule
This rule finalizes the proposed rule
published in the Federal Register May
25, 2005 (70 FR 30009). The 30-day
comment period for the proposed 2004
Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment
Program (DDAP) rule closed on June 24,
2005. The proposed rule provided that
the DDAP program would be based on
hurricane related dairy production and
dairy spoilage losses suffered during the
months of August through October 2004
in counties declared a disaster by the
President in 2004 due to hurricane. The
program will end at the conclusion of
the application period and
disbursement of allotted funds. The
DDAP program will operate under
regulations codified in 7 CFR part 1430.
Among other provisions, the proposed
rule provided that in cases where the
producers had been paid for qualified
dumped milk the producer would still
qualify for payments related to that
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56113
milk. Also, the rule did not provide for
adjustments in payments based on cow
herd size. Rather, the rule provided for
payments to be made based on changes
in milk production from a set base
amount. Also, among other provisions,
the rule provided that in the case the
limited program funds were not
sufficient to pay all claims for lost
production and for dumped milk, then
priority would be given in making
payments to those persons whose losses
over the whole period were greater than
20 percent. It was provided additionally
in the proposed rule that the prices at
which payments would be made would
be amounts set out in the rule which
were derived from a series of reported
‘‘mailbox’’ prices. On these aspects and
all others, comment was invited.
Comments and Changes to Final Rule
During the 30-day comment period
the Agency received public comments
from two U.S. Senators, ten U.S.
congressmen, one dairy cooperative, one
advocacy group and two private
citizens. Some responses contained
multiple comments.
Of the total comments received during
the public comment period, two
respondents opposed the program
indicating that private insurance should
adequately compensate dairy producers
monetarily for losses rather than the
taxpayers or Government. One of those
respondents also believed that the
assistance being provided by the Agency
was duplicative to that of Federal
Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) and that it was misleading for
Congress to insert a statute for
agriculture in a non-related military
spending bill. No changes have been
made in the rule based on these
comments. The agency is charged with
implementing statutory provisions as
written and has done so in the final
rule. It is not understood to be the case
that the relief in the rule duplicates that
provided elsewhere, but provision is
made in the rule to address that
possibility.
Public comments and suggestions
were sought for paying milk marketing
cooperatives directly for milk that was
dumped. Several public comments were
received in support of direct payment of
DDAP benefits to a milk handler or
dairy marketing cooperative rather than
directly to the producer for spoiled milk
that was dumped as a result of the
hurricanes for which the dairy
marketing cooperative or milk handler
compensated the dairy producer.
Respondents indicated that marketing
cooperatives have adequate records to
verify dumped production and confirm
payment to producers made by the dairy
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
56114
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
marketing cooperative or milk handler.
Respondents also believed that the
precedent of direct payments to
marketing cooperatives has been
established in past USDA programs.
Also, one respondent suggested that
producers would be compensated twice
for the same loss if payment is made
directly to a producer in a dairy
operation for dumped milk that was
paid for by the dairy marketing
cooperative or milk handler. The
Agency determined that no change was
warranted. The statute provides for
payments to producers. The proposed
rule set out a fair plan for all losses and
does not prohibit private readjustments.
Several comments were received from
the public regarding payment rates
being based on the average monthly
‘‘mailbox’’ milk price as provided by the
applicable State Marketing Order as
reported by the USDA, Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) during the
eligible months. The ‘‘mailbox’’ milk
price, the pricing basis incorporated
into the proposed rule, is defined by
AMS as: ‘‘The net pay price received by
dairy farmers for milk and includes all
payments received for milk sold and all
costs associated with marketing the
milk. Price is a weighted average for the
reporting area and is reported at the
average butterfat test.’’ The respondents
suggested using, instead of the mailbox
milk price, the Federal Milk Marketing
Order blend prices during the eligible
months. Respondents suggested that the
Federal Milk Marketing Order blend
prices are more accurate because they
adjust for location differences and
recognize the regional costs of
production. The payment plan proposed
provides fair compensation and
sufficient differentiation. No change was
found to be warranted.
Many respondents requested
clarification regarding the limitation on
multiple benefits that prohibit a
producer from being compensated more
than once for the same loss.
Specifically, respondents wanted to
ensure that benefits received from the
Emergency Conservation Program (ECP)
did not preclude a DDAP program
applicant from receiving DDAP benefits.
The Agency does not believe that this
point requires a change in the rule, but
notes that ECP benefits are understood
to be different from those provided for
in this program.
Comments were requested on the
method of payment at two levels in the
event of inadequate funds for all eligible
losses and the appropriate loss level
percentage. No comments on this issue
were received and no change in that
provision was needed.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:44 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
One comment received requested
expeditious implementation of the
program. We have endeavored to
provide for such implementation with a
due concern for assuring a certain and
efficient administration of the program
benefits.
One respondent commented on the
use of plain language and consistency
throughout the proposed rule and
provided editorial recommendations to
improve the clarity of the rule and better
comply with Executive Order
requirements. The respondent’s
suggested recommendations are
editorial and do not affect the
substantive requirements of the
proposed rule. Recommendations have
been adopted where practical and
incorporated throughout. Clarifications
have been made where needed.
Most of the comments received
indicated that the loss calculation was
not equitable to dairy operations that
added cows to the milking herd to offset
production losses during the eligible
months following the 2004 hurricanes.
These respondents were in support of
an adjustment to the loss calculation
that is reflective of cows added to the
milking herd to compensate for loss
production as a result of the hurricanes.
After careful consideration of the
recommendations proposed by the
respondents, the Agency will provide a
production credit to the dairy
operation’s calculated losses for the
addition of cows to the milking herd as
a result of the hurricanes, provided
adequate proof of purchase containing
the date of purchase and number of
head purchased is provided to CCC to
substantiate the dairy operations claim
of dairy cow purchases during the
eligible months. In addition, dairy
operations must report any decreases to
the milking herd as a result of sale or
death. The production credit will be
calculated using the July 2004 per-cow
production average and based on dairy
cow increases or decreases to the
milking herd and the corresponding
days of ownership during each eligible
month.
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be
not significant under Executive Order
12866 and therefore has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does
not apply to this rule because CCC is not
required by 5 U.S.C. 553 or any other
law to publish a notice of proposed
rulemaking with respect to the subject
of this rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Environmental Assessment
The environmental impacts of this
rule have been considered consistent
with the provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts
1500–1508), and FSA’s regulations for
compliance with NEPA, 7 CFR part 799.
To the extent these authorities may
apply, CCC has concluded that this rule
is categorically excluded from further
environmental review as evidenced by
the completion of an environmental
evaluation. No extraordinary
circumstances or other unforeseeable
factors exist which would require
preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement. A copy of the environmental
evaluation is available for inspection
and review upon request.
Executive Order 12988
The rule has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12998.
This final rule preempts State laws to
the extent such laws are inconsistent
with it. This rule is not retroactive.
Before judicial action may be brought
concerning this rule, all administrative
remedies set forth at 7 CFR parts 11 and
780 must be exhausted.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. See the notice
related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V,
published at 48 FR 29115 (June 24,
1983).
Unfunded Mandates
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) does not
apply to this rule because CCC is not
required by 5 U.S.C. 553 or any other
law to publish a notice of proposed
rulemaking for the subject of this rule.
Further, this rule contains no unfunded
mandates as defined in sections 202 and
205 of UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
required to support this program and
assigned it OMB control number 0560.
Copies of the information collection
may be obtained from Danielle Cooke,
phone: (202) 720–1919; e-mail:
Danielle.Cooke@wdc.usda.gov.
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Government Paperwork Elimination
Act
CCC is committed to compliance with
the Government Paperwork Elimination
Act (GPEA) and the Freedom to E-File
Act, which require Government
agencies in general, and FSA in
particular, to provide the public the
option of submitting information or
transacting business electronically to
the maximum extent possible. The
forms and other information collection
activities required to be utilized by a
person subject to this rule are not yet
fully implemented in a way that would
allow the public to conduct business
with CCC electronically. Accordingly, at
this time, all forms required to be
submitted under this rule may be
submitted to CCC by mail or FAX.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1430
Dairy, Disaster assistance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
I For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 1430 is amended
as follows:
PART 1430—DAIRY PRODUCTS
1. The authority citation for part 1430
is revised to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7981 and 7982; 15
U.S.C. 714b and 714c; Pub. L. 108–324, 118
Stat. 1220.
I
2. Add Subpart C to read as follows:
Subpart C—2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance
Payment Program
Sec.
1430.300 Applicability.
1430.301 Administration.
1430.302 Definitions.
1430.303 Time and method of application.
1430.304 Eligibility.
1430.305 Proof of production.
1430.306 Determination of losses incurred.
1430.307 Rate of payment and limitations
on funding.
1430.308 Availability of funds.
1430.309 Appeals.
1430.310 Misrepresentation and scheme or
device.
1430.311 Death, incompetence, or
disappearance.
1430.312 Maintaining records.
1430.313 Refunds; joint and several
liability.
1430.314 Miscellaneous provisions.
1430.315 Termination of program.
Subpart C—2004 Dairy Disaster
Assistance Payment Program
§ 1430.300
Applicability.
(a) Subject to the availability of funds,
this subpart sets forth the terms and
conditions applicable to the 2004 Dairy
Disaster Assistance Payment Program
authorized by section 103 of Division B
of Public Law 108–324. Benefits are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:27 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
available to eligible United States
producers who have suffered dairy
production losses and dairy spoilage
losses in eligible counties as a result of
a hurricane disaster in 2004.
(b) To be eligible for this program, a
producer must have been a milk
producer in 2004 in a county declared
a disaster by the President of the United
States due to a 2004 hurricane. Only
losses occurring in those counties are
eligible for payment in this program.
Producers in contiguous counties that
were not designated by the President as
a disaster county due to a hurricane in
2004 are not eligible.
(c) Subject to the availability of funds,
benefits shall be provided by the
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) to
eligible dairy producers. Additional
terms and conditions may be set forth in
the payment application that must be
executed by participants to receive a
disaster assistance payment for dairy
production losses and dairy spoilage
losses.
(d) To be eligible for payments,
producers must comply with the
provisions of, and their losses must
meet the conditions of, this subpart and
any other conditions imposed by CCC.
§ 1430.301
Administration.
(a) The 2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance
Payment Program shall be administered
under the general supervision of the
Executive Vice President, CCC
(Administrator, FSA), or a designee, and
shall be carried out in the field by FSA
State and county committees (State and
county committees) and FSA
employees.
(b) State and county committees, and
representatives and employees thereof,
do not have the authority to modify or
waive any of the provisions of the
regulations of this subpart.
(c) The State committee shall take any
action required by the regulations of this
subpart that has not been taken by the
county committee. The State committee
shall also:
(1) Correct, or require the county
committee to correct, any action taken
by such county committee that is not in
accordance with the regulations of this
subpart; and
(2) Require a county committee to
withhold taking any action that is not in
accordance with the regulations of this
subpart.
(d) No provision of delegation in this
subpart to a State or county committee
shall preclude the Executive Vice
President, CCC, or a designee, from
determining any question arising under
the program or from reversing or
modifying any determination made by
the State or county committee.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56115
(e) The Deputy Administrator, Farm
Programs, FSA, may authorize State and
county committees to waive or modify
deadlines in cases where lateness or
failure to meet such requirements do not
adversely affect the operation of the
2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment
Program and does not violate statutory
limitations on the program.
(f) Data furnished by the applicants is
used to determine eligibility for program
benefits. Although participation in the
2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment
Program is voluntary, program benefits
are not to be provided unless the
participant furnishes all requested data.
§ 1430.302
Definitions.
The definitions set forth in this
section shall be applicable for all
purposes of administering the 2004
Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment
Program established by this subpart.
Application means the 2004 Dairy
Disaster Assistance Payment Program
Application.
Application period means the time
period established by the Deputy
Administrator for producers to apply for
program benefits.
CCC means the Commodity Credit
Corporation of the Department.
County committee means the FSA
county committee.
County office means the FSA office
responsible for administering FSA
programs for farms located in a specific
area in a state.
Dairy operation means any person or
group of persons who, as a single unit,
as determined by CCC, produces and
markets milk commercially from cows
and whose production facilities are
located in the United States.
Department or USDA means the
United States Department of
Agriculture.
Deputy Administrator means the
Deputy Administrator for Farm
Programs (DAFP), FSA, or a designee.
Disaster county means a county
declared a disaster by the President of
the United States due to a hurricane in
2004, and is only the county so
declared, not a contiguous county.
Farm Service Agency or FSA means
the Farm Service Agency of the
Department.
Hundredweight or cwt. means 100
pounds.
Milk handler or cooperative means
the marketing agency to, or through
which, the producer commercially
markets whole milk.
Milk marketings means a marketing of
milk for which there is a verifiable sales
or delivery record of milk marketed for
commercial use. In counting milk
toward production amounts, dumped
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
56116
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
milk will not be considered as marketed
for commercial use. Such dumped milk
shall be counted toward production but
will be accounted for separately from
milk that is marketed for normal
commercial use as determined by the
Deputy Administrator. All production
in the months for which loss coverage
is available will be counted in making
determinations under this part, as
determined by the Deputy
Administrator, with care to avoid
double counting, and with care to avoid
a calculated loss that overstates the
actual losses.
Payment pounds means the pounds of
milk production from a dairy operation
for which the dairy producer is eligible
to be paid under this subpart.
Producer means any individual, group
of individuals, partnership, corporation,
estate, trust association, cooperative, or
other business enterprise or other legal
entity who is, or whose members are, a
citizen of, or legal resident alien in the
United States, and who directly or
indirectly, as determined by the
Secretary, shares in the risk of
producing milk, and makes
contributions (including land, labor,
management, equipment, or capital) to
the dairy farming operation of the
individual or entity of the proceeds of
this operation.
Starting base production means actual
commercial production marketed by the
dairy operation during the month of July
2004, or alternative period established
by the Deputy Administrator.
Verifiable production records means
evidence that is used to substantiate the
amount of production marketed,
including any dumped production, and
that can be verified by CCC through an
independent source.
§ 1430.303 Time and method of
application.
(a) Dairy producers may obtain an
Application, in person, by mail, by
telephone, or by facsimile from any
county FSA office. In addition,
applicants may download a copy of the
Application at https://
www.sc.egov.usda.gov.
(b) A request for benefits under this
subpart must be submitted on a
completed Application as defined in
§ 1430.302. Applications and any other
supporting documentation shall be
submitted to the FSA county office
serving the county where the dairy
operation is located but, in any case,
must be received by the FSA county
office by the close of business on the
date established by the Deputy
Administrator. The closing date shall be
no sooner than October 11, 2005.
Applications not received by the close
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:27 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
of business on such date will be
disapproved as not having been timely
filed and the dairy producer will not be
eligible for benefits under this program.
(c) All persons who share in the risk
of a dairy operation’s total production
must certify to the information on the
Application before the Application is
considered complete.
(d) Each dairy producer requesting
benefits under this subpart must certify
to the accuracy and truthfulness of the
information provided in their
application and any supporting
documentation. All information
provided is subject to verification by
CCC. Refusal to allow CCC or any other
agency of the Department of Agriculture
to verify any information provided will
result in a denial of eligibility.
Furnishing the information is voluntary;
however, without it program benefits
will not be approved. Providing a false
certification to the Government may be
punishable by imprisonment, fines and
other penalties or sanctions.
§ 1430.304
Eligibility.
(a) Producers in the United States are
eligible to receive hurricane-related
dairy disaster benefits under this part
only if they have suffered dairy
production or dairy spoilage losses in
counties declared a disaster by the
President due to any hurricane in 2004.
To be eligible to receive payments under
this subpart, producers in a dairy
operation must:
(1) Have produced and commercially
marketed milk in the United States and
commercially marketed the milk
produced during the 2004 calendar year;
(2) Be a producer on a dairy farm
operation physically located in a
disaster county where production and
milk spoilage losses were incurred as a
result of 2004 hurricanes, and limiting
their claims to losses occurring in those
counties;
(3) Provide proof of monthly milk
production dumped and commercially
marketed by all persons in the eligible
dairy operation during the third quarter
of the 2004 milk marketing year, or
other period as determined by FSA, to
determine the total pounds of eligible
losses that will be used for payment;
and
(4) Apply for payments during the
application period established by the
Deputy Administrator.
(b) Payments may be made for losses
suffered by an otherwise eligible
producer who is now deceased or is a
dissolved entity if a representative who
currently has authority to enter into a
contract for the producer or the
producer’s estate signs the application
for payment. Proof of authority to sign
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for the deceased producer’s estate or a
dissolved entity must be provided. If a
producer is now a dissolved general
partnership or joint venture, all
members of the general partnership or
joint venture at the time of dissolution
or their duly-authorized representatives
must sign the application for payment.
(c) Producers associated with a dairy
operation must submit a timely
application and comply with terms and
conditions of this subpart, instructions
issued by CCC and instructions
contained in the Application to be
eligible for benefits under this subpart.
(d) As a condition to receive benefits
under this part, a producer must have
been in compliance with the Highly
Erodible Land Conservation and
Wetland Conservation provisions of 7
CFR part 12 for the 2004 calendar year,
as applicable, and must not otherwise
be barred from receiving benefits under
7 CFR part 12 or any other law or
regulation.
(e) Payments are limited to losses in
eligible counties in eligible months.
(f) All payments under this part are
subject to the availability of funds.
§ 1430.305
Proof of production.
(a) Evidence of production is required
to establish the commercial marketing
and production history of the dairy
operation so that production and
spoilage losses can be computed in
accordance with § 1430.306.
(b) A dairy producer must, based on
the instructions issued by the Deputy
Administrator, provide adequate proof
of the dairy operation’s commercial
production, including any dumped
production and dairy cow purchases, for
each month of the period July 2004
through October 2004, and must
specifically identify any dumped
production for August through October
2004. If a month other than July 2004 is
used for base creation purposes records
for that month must be provided.
(1) A producer must certify and
provide such proof as requested that
losses for which compensation is
claimed were hurricane-related and
occurred in an eligible county in an
eligible month.
(2) Additional supporting
documentation may be requested by
FSA as necessary to verify production or
spoilage losses and dairy herd increases
or decreases to the satisfaction of FSA.
(c) Adequate proof of production
history of the dairy operation under
paragraph (b) of this section must be
based on milk marketing statements
obtained from the dairy operation’s milk
handler or marketing cooperative.
Supporting documents may include, but
are not limited to: tank records, milk
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
handler records, daily milk marketings,
copies of any payments received from
other sources for production or spoilage
losses, or any other documents available
to confirm the production history and
losses incurred by the dairy operation.
(d) Adequate proof of dairy cow
additions to the milking herd during the
eligible months can include, but are not
limited to sales receipts, invoices, State
health certificates, or any other
documents available to confirm the cow
purchases.
(e) All information provided to FSA
by a producer is subject to verification,
spot-check and audit by FSA. Also, FSA
or another CCC representative may
examine the dairy operation’s
production or spoilage claims.
(f) If adequate proof of commerciallymarketed production and supporting
documentation is not presented to the
satisfaction of CCC or FSA, the request
for benefits will be rejected. In the case
of a new producer that had no
verifiable, actual, commercial
production marketed by the dairy
operation during the month of July
2004, but which suffered eligible losses,
an alternate base period may be
established by the Deputy
Administrator.
§ 1430.306
incurred.
Determination of losses
(a) Eligible payable losses are
calculated on a dairy operation by dairy
operation basis and are limited to those
occurring in August through October
2004. Specifically, dairy production and
spoilage losses incurred by producers
under this subpart are determined on
the established history of the dairy
operation’s actual commercial
production marketed from August
through October 2004, and actual
production dumped or otherwise not
marketed from August through October
2004, as provided by the dairy operation
consistent with § 1430.305. Except as
otherwise provided in these regulations,
the starting base production, as defined
in § 1430.302, is adjusted downward by
a percentage determined by CCC to
determine the base production for the
months of August through October
2004. These adjustments are made to
account for the seasonal declines that
can occur during those months. The
base production for each of the months
August through October 2004 is
calculated by reducing the starting base
production (July 2004, or alternate
month approved by the Deputy
Administrator for new producers) as
follows:
(1) August 2004 base production is
the starting base production reduced by
9 percent;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:27 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
(2) September 2004 base production is
the starting base production reduced by
15 percent;
(3) October 2004 base production is
the starting base production reduced by
11 percent.
(b) The eligible dairy production
losses for a dairy operation for each of
the months of August through October
2004 will be:
(1) The new base production for the
dairy operation calculated under
paragraph (a) of this section less,
(2) For each such month for each
dairy operation, the total of:
(i) Actual commercially-marketed
production (not counting dumped
production counted under paragraph
(b)(1)(ii) of this section); plus
(ii) The pounds of milk production
dumped (whether related to the
hurricane or not), or otherwise not
commercially marketed (whether related
to the hurricane or not). For dumping
losses to be eligible, they must, as with
other program losses, be hurricane
related, as described under paragraphs
(c) and (d) of this section.
(c) Actual production losses may be
adjusted to the extent the reduction in
production is not certified by the
producer to be the result of the
hurricane or is determined by FSA not
to be hurricane-related. Actual
production, as adjusted, that exceeds
the adjusted base production will mean
that the dairy operation incurred no
eligible production losses for the
corresponding month as a result of the
hurricane disaster, and that the
production level for that month does not
qualify for a payment under this
program.
(d) Eligible dairy spoilage losses
incurred by producers under this
subpart for each of the months August
through October 2004 will be
determined based on actual milk
produced in those months that was
dumped on the farm as a result of the
2004 hurricanes. Proper documentation
of milk dumped on the farm as a result
of spoilage due to a hurricane must be
provided to CCC as provided in
§ 1430.305.
(e) Calculated production losses may
be adjusted by FSA based on the
monthly average of daily dairy cow
additions or reductions to the milking
herd during the period of July 1, 2004
through October 31, 2004, to account for
production adjustments as a result of
dairy cow purchases, sales, or death
losses. Production adjustments can be
calculated using the average number of
dairy cows in a dairy operation’s
milking herd and the average
production per cow during each
applicable month. Per-cow production
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56117
averages during the months of August
through October will be determined
based on the actual per-cow production
average during the month of July 2004
and reduced downward according to the
seasonal decline percentages provided
in paragraph (a) of this section, to
determine the total production that may
be credited back to the dairy operation’s
total production losses. To qualify for
the production adjustment:
(1) Producers in eligible dairy
operations must report any increases or
decreases to the dairy cow milking herd
during the period of July 1, 2004
through October 31, 2004.
(2) Adequate supporting
documentation according to § 1430.305
must be provided to the satisfaction of
the COC to verify any claims of herd
increases or decreases during the
eligible period.
(3) Any cows purchased during the
eligible period that would increase the
dairy cow milking herd must have been
to offset production losses as a result of
the 2004 hurricanes.
(f) Eligible production and spoilage
losses as otherwise determined under
paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section
are added together to determine total
eligible losses incurred by the dairy
operation subject to all other eligibility
requirements as may be included in this
part or elsewhere.
(g) Payment on eligible dairy
operation losses is calculated using
whole pounds of milk. No double
counting is permitted, and only one
payment will be made for each pound
of milk calculated as an eligible loss
after the distribution of the operation’s
eligible production loss among the
producers of the dairy operation
according to § 1420.307(b). Payments
under this part will not be affected by
any payments for dumped or spoiled
milk that the dairy operation may have
received from its milk handler, or
marketing cooperative, or any other
private party.
(h) If a producer is eligible to receive
payments under this part and benefits
under any other program administered
by the Secretary for the same losses, the
producer must choose whether to
receive the other program benefits or
payments under this part, but shall not
be eligible for both. The limitation on
multiple benefits prohibits a producer
from being compensated more than once
for the same losses. If the other USDA
program benefits are not available until
after an application for benefits has been
filed under this part, the producer may,
to avoid this restriction on such other
benefits, refund the total amount of the
payment to the administrative FSA
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
56118
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
office from which the payment was
received.
§ 1430.307 Rate of payment and limitations
on funding.
(a) Subject to the availability of funds,
the payment rate for eligible production
and spoilage losses determined
according to § 1430.306 is, depending
on the State, the average monthly
Mailbox milk price for the Florida, the
Southeast, or the Appalachian States
Marketing Orders as reported by the
Agricultural Marketing Service during
the months of August, September, and
October of 2004. Maximum payment
rates for eligible losses for dairy
operations located in specific states are
as follows:
(1) Florida—$17.62 per
hundredweight ($0.1762 per pound).
(2) Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and
Mississippi—$16.26 per hundredweight
($0.1626 per pound).
(3) North Carolina and South
Carolina—$15.59 per hundredweight
($0.1559 per pound).
(b) Subject to the availability of funds,
each eligible dairy operation’s payment
is calculated by multiplying the
applicable payment rate under
paragraph (a) of this section by the
operation’s total eligible losses. Where
there are multiple producers in the
dairy operation, individual producers’
payments are disbursed according to
each producer’s share of the dairy
operation’s production as specified in
the Application.
(c) If the total value of losses claimed
under paragraph (b) of this section
exceeds the $10 million available for the
2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment
Program, less any reserve that may be
created under paragraph (e) of this
section, total eligible losses of
individual dairy operations that, as
calculated as an overall percentage for
the full three month period, August–
October 2004 (not a monthly average for
any one month), are greater than 20
percent of the total base production for
those three months will be paid at the
maximum rate under paragraph (a) of
this section to the extent available
funding allows. A loss of over 20
percent in only one or two of the
eligible months does not itself qualify
for the maximum per-pound payment.
Total eligible losses for a producer, as
calculated under § 1430.306, of less than
or equal to 20 percent during the
eligibility period of August to October
2004 will be paid at a rate determined
by dividing the eligible losses of less
than 20 percent by the funds remaining
after making payments for all eligible
losses above the 20 percent threshold.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:27 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
(d) In no event shall the payment
exceed the value determined by
multiplying the producer’s total eligible
loss times the average price received for
commercial milk production in their
area as defined in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(e) A reserve may be created to handle
claims that extend beyond the
conclusion of the application period,
but claims shall not be payable once the
available funding is expended.
§ 1430.308
Availability of funds.
The total available program funds
shall be $10 million as provided by
section 103 of Division B of Public Law
108–324.
§ 1430.309
Appeals.
Any producer who is dissatisfied with
a determination made pursuant to this
subpart may request reconsideration or
appeal of such determination in
accordance with the appeal regulations
set forth at 7 CFR parts 11 and 780.
Appeals of determinations of
ineligibility or payment amounts are
subject to the limitations in §§ 1430.307
and 1430.308.
§ 1430.310
or device.
Misrepresentation and scheme
(a) In addition to other penalties,
sanctions or remedies as may apply, a
dairy producer shall be ineligible to
receive assistance under this program if
the producer is determined by FSA or
CCC to have:
(1) Adopted any scheme or device
that tends to defeat the purpose of this
program;
(2) Made any fraudulent
representation; or
(3) Misrepresented any fact affecting a
program determination.
(b) Any funds disbursed pursuant to
this part to any person or operation
engaged in a misrepresentation, scheme,
or device, shall be refunded with
interest together with such other sums
as may become due. Any dairy
operation or person engaged in acts
prohibited by this section and any dairy
operation or person receiving payment
under this subpart shall be jointly and
severally liable with other persons or
operations involved in such claim for
benefits for any refund due under this
section and for related charges. The
remedies provided in this subpart shall
be in addition to other civil, criminal, or
administrative remedies that may apply.
§ 1430.311 Death, incompetence, or
disappearance.
In the case of death, incompetency,
disappearance, or dissolution of a
person that is eligible to receive benefits
in accordance with this subpart, such
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
alternate person or persons specified in
7 CFR part 707 may receive such
benefits, as determined appropriate by
FSA.
§ 1430.312
Maintaining records.
Persons applying for benefits under
this program must maintain records and
accounts to document all eligibility
requirements specified herein. Such
records and accounts must be retained
for 3 years after the date of payment to
the dairy operations under this program.
Destruction of the records after such
date shall be at the risk of the party
undertaking the destruction.
§ 1430.313
liability.
Refunds; joint and several
(a) Excess payments, payments
provided as the result of erroneous
information provided by any person, or
payments resulting from a failure to
comply with any requirement or
condition for payment under the
application or this subpart, must be
refunded to CCC.
(b) A refund required under this
section shall be due with interest
determined in accordance with
paragraph (d) of this section and late
payment charges as provided in 7 CFR
part 1403.
(c) Persons signing a dairy operation’s
application as having an interest in the
operation shall be jointly and severally
liable for any refund and related charges
found to be due under this section.
(d) Interest shall be applicable to any
refunds required in accordance with 7
CFR parts 792 and 1403. Such interest
shall be charged at the rate the United
States Department of the Treasury
charges CCC for funds, and shall accrue
from the date FSA or CCC made the
erroneous payment to the date of
repayment.
(e) FSA may waive the accrual of
interest if it determines that the cause of
the erroneous determination was not
due to any action of the person, or was
beyond the control of the person
committing the violation. Any waiver is
at the discretion of FSA alone.
§ 1430.314
Miscellaneous provisions.
(a) Offset. CCC may offset or withhold
any amount due CCC under this subpart
in accordance with 7 CFR part 1403.
(b) Claims. Claims or debts are settled
in accordance with 7 CFR part 1403.
(c) Other interests. Payments or any
portion thereof due under this subpart
shall be made without regard to
questions of title under State law and
without regard to any claim or lien
against the livestock, or proceeds
thereof, in favor of the owner or any
other creditor except agencies and
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
instrumentalities of the U.S.
Government.
(d) Assignments. Any producer
entitled to any payment under this part
may assign any payments in accordance
with the provisions of 7 CFR part 1404.
§ 1430.315
Termination of program.
This program ends after payment has
been made to those applicants certified
as eligible pursuant to the application
period established in § 1430.304. All
eligibility determinations shall be final
except as otherwise determined by the
Deputy Administrator.
Signed at Washington, DC, on September
13, 2005.
James R. Little,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 05–19127 Filed 9–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
New Orleans, Louisiana, has been
closed since Hurricane Katrina and the
flooding that followed that disaster.
Moreover, many of the lessees and
operators subject to the rule are
similarly engaged in the restoration of
normal operations following Hurricane
Katrina. Lessees and operators will be
making changes in their own procedures
to comply with the rule. Lessees and
operators whose operations have been
interrupted as a result of the hurricane
may not be able to make these changes
until normal operations resume.
Accordingly, the Department of the
Interior is postponing the effective date
of the final rule until January 1, 2006.
Dated: September 20, 2005.
Rebecca W. Watson,
Assistant Secretary—Land and Minerals
Management.
[FR Doc. 05–19223 Filed 9–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
30 CFR Parts 250 and 256
Patent and Trademark Office
RIN 1010–AD16
37 CFR Parts 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10
Oil, Gas, and Sulphur Operations and
Leasing in the Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS)—Cost Recovery
[Docket No.: 2005–P–053]
Minerals Management Service
(MMS), Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective
date.
Provisions for Claiming the Benefit of
a Provisional Application With a NonEnglish Specification and Other
Miscellaneous Matters
AGENCY:
MMS is delaying until
January 1, 2006, the effective date of a
rule that will implement fees to offset
MMS’s costs of providing certain
services related to its mineral programs.
This delay is necessary because of
damage caused in the New Orleans area
by Hurricane Katrina and subsequent
flooding. The delay will provide relief
to the government and the oil and gas
industry as they recover from this
disaster.
DATES: The effective date of the rule
amending 30 CFR Parts 250 and 256
published at 70 FR 49871, August 25,
2005 is delayed until January 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela Mazzullo, Offshore Minerals
Management (OMM) Budget Office at
(703) 787–1691.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The rule
published August 25, 2005, requires
MMS to develop additional procedures
that MMS will provide to the oil and gas
industry in the form of a Notice to
Lessees. The primary office responsible
for developing those procedures, the
MMS Gulf of Mexico Regional Office in
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:11 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
RIN 0651–AB85
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (Office) is amending
the rules of practice to require that: A
copy of the English translation of a
foreign-language provisional application
be filed in the provisional application if
a nonprovisional application claims the
benefit of the provisional application; a
copy of documentary evidence
supporting a claim of ownership be
recorded in the Office’s assignment
records when an assignee takes action in
a patent matter; and separate copies of
a document be submitted to the Office
for recording in the Office’s assignment
records, each accompanied by a cover
sheet, if the document to be recorded
includes an interest in, or a transaction
involving, both patents and trademarks.
DATES: Effective November 25, 2005.
Applicability Date: The changes apply
to any paper, application or
reexamination proceeding filed in the
Office on or after November 25, 2005.
Further, if a nonprovisional patent
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56119
application claims the benefit of the
filing date of a non-English provisional
application, a translation of the
provisional application and a statement
that the translation was accurate
required by 37 CFR 1.78(a)(5)(iv) will
not be required to be filed in the
provisional application, if the
translation and statement were filed in
the nonprovisional application before
November 25, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karin Ferriter (571–272–7744), Senior
Legal Advisor, Office of Patent Legal
Administration, Office of the Deputy
Commissioner for Patent Examination
Policy, or Robert J. Spar (571–272–
7700), Director of the Office of Patent
Legal Administration, Office of the
Deputy Commissioner for Patent
Examination Policy, directly by phone,
or by facsimile to 571–273–7744, or by
mail addressed to: Mail Stop
Comments—Patents, Commissioner for
Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA
22313–1450.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule revises the rules of practice in title
37 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) pertaining to records related to
signature, availability of patent
application files, power of attorney,
provisional applications, and
assignments.
Discussion of Specific Rules
Section 1.4: Section 1.4(d)(2) is
amended to delete ‘‘with a signature in
permanent dark ink or its equivalent,’’
because dark ink applies to handwritten
signatures, not S-signatures. Section
1.4(d)(2)(ii) is amended to move the
word ‘‘only’’ in the second sentence
thereof from immediately preceding the
word ‘‘be’’ to immediately following the
word ‘‘used’’ and to change ‘‘registered
practitioner’’ to ‘‘patent practitioner
(§ 1.32(a)(1)).’’ The term ‘‘patent
practitioner’’ is defined in § 1.32(a).
Section 1.11: Section 1.11(a) is
amended for clarity and to reflect the
policy regarding availability to the
public of papers in the files of
applications that have been published.
For example, § 1.11(a) is amended to
remove ‘‘abandoned’’ before ‘‘published
application.’’ Published applications are
not physically available to the public to
copy and inspect if the file is
maintained in a paper file wrapper. If a
published application is not maintained
in paper, but is instead maintained in
the image file wrapper (IFW) system, the
application is made available for public
inspection through the Patent
Application Information Retrieval
(PAIR) system pursuant to
§ 1.14(a)(1)(iii) and 1.14(b). Since most
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 185 (Monday, September 26, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56113-56119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19127]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
7 CFR Part 1430
RIN 0560-AH28
2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment Program
AGENCIES: Commodity Credit Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule sets forth the regulations for the 2004 Dairy
Disaster Assistance Payment Program. This program will assist dairy
producers by providing payments to those who suffered dairy production
and milk spoilage losses due to hurricanes in 2004.
DATES: This rule is effective on September 26, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Danielle Cooke, Price Support
Division, Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture,
STOP 0512, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-0512.
Telephone: (202) 720-1919; e-mail: Danielle.Cooke@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion of Final Rule
This rule finalizes the proposed rule published in the Federal
Register May 25, 2005 (70 FR 30009). The 30-day comment period for the
proposed 2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment Program (DDAP) rule
closed on June 24, 2005. The proposed rule provided that the DDAP
program would be based on hurricane related dairy production and dairy
spoilage losses suffered during the months of August through October
2004 in counties declared a disaster by the President in 2004 due to
hurricane. The program will end at the conclusion of the application
period and disbursement of allotted funds. The DDAP program will
operate under regulations codified in 7 CFR part 1430.
Among other provisions, the proposed rule provided that in cases
where the producers had been paid for qualified dumped milk the
producer would still qualify for payments related to that milk. Also,
the rule did not provide for adjustments in payments based on cow herd
size. Rather, the rule provided for payments to be made based on
changes in milk production from a set base amount. Also, among other
provisions, the rule provided that in the case the limited program
funds were not sufficient to pay all claims for lost production and for
dumped milk, then priority would be given in making payments to those
persons whose losses over the whole period were greater than 20
percent. It was provided additionally in the proposed rule that the
prices at which payments would be made would be amounts set out in the
rule which were derived from a series of reported ``mailbox'' prices.
On these aspects and all others, comment was invited.
Comments and Changes to Final Rule
During the 30-day comment period the Agency received public
comments from two U.S. Senators, ten U.S. congressmen, one dairy
cooperative, one advocacy group and two private citizens. Some
responses contained multiple comments.
Of the total comments received during the public comment period,
two respondents opposed the program indicating that private insurance
should adequately compensate dairy producers monetarily for losses
rather than the taxpayers or Government. One of those respondents also
believed that the assistance being provided by the Agency was
duplicative to that of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and
that it was misleading for Congress to insert a statute for agriculture
in a non-related military spending bill. No changes have been made in
the rule based on these comments. The agency is charged with
implementing statutory provisions as written and has done so in the
final rule. It is not understood to be the case that the relief in the
rule duplicates that provided elsewhere, but provision is made in the
rule to address that possibility.
Public comments and suggestions were sought for paying milk
marketing cooperatives directly for milk that was dumped. Several
public comments were received in support of direct payment of DDAP
benefits to a milk handler or dairy marketing cooperative rather than
directly to the producer for spoiled milk that was dumped as a result
of the hurricanes for which the dairy marketing cooperative or milk
handler compensated the dairy producer. Respondents indicated that
marketing cooperatives have adequate records to verify dumped
production and confirm payment to producers made by the dairy
[[Page 56114]]
marketing cooperative or milk handler. Respondents also believed that
the precedent of direct payments to marketing cooperatives has been
established in past USDA programs. Also, one respondent suggested that
producers would be compensated twice for the same loss if payment is
made directly to a producer in a dairy operation for dumped milk that
was paid for by the dairy marketing cooperative or milk handler. The
Agency determined that no change was warranted. The statute provides
for payments to producers. The proposed rule set out a fair plan for
all losses and does not prohibit private readjustments.
Several comments were received from the public regarding payment
rates being based on the average monthly ``mailbox'' milk price as
provided by the applicable State Marketing Order as reported by the
USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) during the eligible months.
The ``mailbox'' milk price, the pricing basis incorporated into the
proposed rule, is defined by AMS as: ``The net pay price received by
dairy farmers for milk and includes all payments received for milk sold
and all costs associated with marketing the milk. Price is a weighted
average for the reporting area and is reported at the average butterfat
test.'' The respondents suggested using, instead of the mailbox milk
price, the Federal Milk Marketing Order blend prices during the
eligible months. Respondents suggested that the Federal Milk Marketing
Order blend prices are more accurate because they adjust for location
differences and recognize the regional costs of production. The payment
plan proposed provides fair compensation and sufficient
differentiation. No change was found to be warranted.
Many respondents requested clarification regarding the limitation
on multiple benefits that prohibit a producer from being compensated
more than once for the same loss. Specifically, respondents wanted to
ensure that benefits received from the Emergency Conservation Program
(ECP) did not preclude a DDAP program applicant from receiving DDAP
benefits. The Agency does not believe that this point requires a change
in the rule, but notes that ECP benefits are understood to be different
from those provided for in this program.
Comments were requested on the method of payment at two levels in
the event of inadequate funds for all eligible losses and the
appropriate loss level percentage. No comments on this issue were
received and no change in that provision was needed.
One comment received requested expeditious implementation of the
program. We have endeavored to provide for such implementation with a
due concern for assuring a certain and efficient administration of the
program benefits.
One respondent commented on the use of plain language and
consistency throughout the proposed rule and provided editorial
recommendations to improve the clarity of the rule and better comply
with Executive Order requirements. The respondent's suggested
recommendations are editorial and do not affect the substantive
requirements of the proposed rule. Recommendations have been adopted
where practical and incorporated throughout. Clarifications have been
made where needed.
Most of the comments received indicated that the loss calculation
was not equitable to dairy operations that added cows to the milking
herd to offset production losses during the eligible months following
the 2004 hurricanes. These respondents were in support of an adjustment
to the loss calculation that is reflective of cows added to the milking
herd to compensate for loss production as a result of the hurricanes.
After careful consideration of the recommendations proposed by the
respondents, the Agency will provide a production credit to the dairy
operation's calculated losses for the addition of cows to the milking
herd as a result of the hurricanes, provided adequate proof of purchase
containing the date of purchase and number of head purchased is
provided to CCC to substantiate the dairy operations claim of dairy cow
purchases during the eligible months. In addition, dairy operations
must report any decreases to the milking herd as a result of sale or
death. The production credit will be calculated using the July 2004
per-cow production average and based on dairy cow increases or
decreases to the milking herd and the corresponding days of ownership
during each eligible month.
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be not significant under Executive
Order 12866 and therefore has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this rule because
CCC is not required by 5 U.S.C. 553 or any other law to publish a
notice of proposed rulemaking with respect to the subject of this rule.
Environmental Assessment
The environmental impacts of this rule have been considered
consistent with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., the regulations of the Council
on Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and FSA's
regulations for compliance with NEPA, 7 CFR part 799. To the extent
these authorities may apply, CCC has concluded that this rule is
categorically excluded from further environmental review as evidenced
by the completion of an environmental evaluation. No extraordinary
circumstances or other unforeseeable factors exist which would require
preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact
statement. A copy of the environmental evaluation is available for
inspection and review upon request.
Executive Order 12988
The rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order
12998. This final rule preempts State laws to the extent such laws are
inconsistent with it. This rule is not retroactive. Before judicial
action may be brought concerning this rule, all administrative remedies
set forth at 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 must be exhausted.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to Executive Order 12372, which
requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials.
See the notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V, published at 48
FR 29115 (June 24, 1983).
Unfunded Mandates
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) does
not apply to this rule because CCC is not required by 5 U.S.C. 553 or
any other law to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking for the
subject of this rule. Further, this rule contains no unfunded mandates
as defined in sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection
required to support this program and assigned it OMB control number
0560. Copies of the information collection may be obtained from
Danielle Cooke, phone: (202) 720-1919; e-mail:
Danielle.Cooke@wdc.usda.gov.
[[Page 56115]]
Government Paperwork Elimination Act
CCC is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA) and the Freedom to E-File Act, which require
Government agencies in general, and FSA in particular, to provide the
public the option of submitting information or transacting business
electronically to the maximum extent possible. The forms and other
information collection activities required to be utilized by a person
subject to this rule are not yet fully implemented in a way that would
allow the public to conduct business with CCC electronically.
Accordingly, at this time, all forms required to be submitted under
this rule may be submitted to CCC by mail or FAX.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1430
Dairy, Disaster assistance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 7 CFR part 1430 is amended as
follows:
PART 1430--DAIRY PRODUCTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 1430 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7981 and 7982; 15 U.S.C. 714b and 714c; Pub.
L. 108-324, 118 Stat. 1220.
0
2. Add Subpart C to read as follows:
Subpart C--2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment Program
Sec.
1430.300 Applicability.
1430.301 Administration.
1430.302 Definitions.
1430.303 Time and method of application.
1430.304 Eligibility.
1430.305 Proof of production.
1430.306 Determination of losses incurred.
1430.307 Rate of payment and limitations on funding.
1430.308 Availability of funds.
1430.309 Appeals.
1430.310 Misrepresentation and scheme or device.
1430.311 Death, incompetence, or disappearance.
1430.312 Maintaining records.
1430.313 Refunds; joint and several liability.
1430.314 Miscellaneous provisions.
1430.315 Termination of program.
Subpart C--2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment Program
Sec. 1430.300 Applicability.
(a) Subject to the availability of funds, this subpart sets forth
the terms and conditions applicable to the 2004 Dairy Disaster
Assistance Payment Program authorized by section 103 of Division B of
Public Law 108-324. Benefits are available to eligible United States
producers who have suffered dairy production losses and dairy spoilage
losses in eligible counties as a result of a hurricane disaster in
2004.
(b) To be eligible for this program, a producer must have been a
milk producer in 2004 in a county declared a disaster by the President
of the United States due to a 2004 hurricane. Only losses occurring in
those counties are eligible for payment in this program. Producers in
contiguous counties that were not designated by the President as a
disaster county due to a hurricane in 2004 are not eligible.
(c) Subject to the availability of funds, benefits shall be
provided by the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) to eligible dairy
producers. Additional terms and conditions may be set forth in the
payment application that must be executed by participants to receive a
disaster assistance payment for dairy production losses and dairy
spoilage losses.
(d) To be eligible for payments, producers must comply with the
provisions of, and their losses must meet the conditions of, this
subpart and any other conditions imposed by CCC.
Sec. 1430.301 Administration.
(a) The 2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment Program shall be
administered under the general supervision of the Executive Vice
President, CCC (Administrator, FSA), or a designee, and shall be
carried out in the field by FSA State and county committees (State and
county committees) and FSA employees.
(b) State and county committees, and representatives and employees
thereof, do not have the authority to modify or waive any of the
provisions of the regulations of this subpart.
(c) The State committee shall take any action required by the
regulations of this subpart that has not been taken by the county
committee. The State committee shall also:
(1) Correct, or require the county committee to correct, any action
taken by such county committee that is not in accordance with the
regulations of this subpart; and
(2) Require a county committee to withhold taking any action that
is not in accordance with the regulations of this subpart.
(d) No provision of delegation in this subpart to a State or county
committee shall preclude the Executive Vice President, CCC, or a
designee, from determining any question arising under the program or
from reversing or modifying any determination made by the State or
county committee.
(e) The Deputy Administrator, Farm Programs, FSA, may authorize
State and county committees to waive or modify deadlines in cases where
lateness or failure to meet such requirements do not adversely affect
the operation of the 2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment Program and
does not violate statutory limitations on the program.
(f) Data furnished by the applicants is used to determine
eligibility for program benefits. Although participation in the 2004
Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment Program is voluntary, program
benefits are not to be provided unless the participant furnishes all
requested data.
Sec. 1430.302 Definitions.
The definitions set forth in this section shall be applicable for
all purposes of administering the 2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance
Payment Program established by this subpart.
Application means the 2004 Dairy Disaster Assistance Payment
Program Application.
Application period means the time period established by the Deputy
Administrator for producers to apply for program benefits.
CCC means the Commodity Credit Corporation of the Department.
County committee means the FSA county committee.
County office means the FSA office responsible for administering
FSA programs for farms located in a specific area in a state.
Dairy operation means any person or group of persons who, as a
single unit, as determined by CCC, produces and markets milk
commercially from cows and whose production facilities are located in
the United States.
Department or USDA means the United States Department of
Agriculture.
Deputy Administrator means the Deputy Administrator for Farm
Programs (DAFP), FSA, or a designee.
Disaster county means a county declared a disaster by the President
of the United States due to a hurricane in 2004, and is only the county
so declared, not a contiguous county.
Farm Service Agency or FSA means the Farm Service Agency of the
Department.
Hundredweight or cwt. means 100 pounds.
Milk handler or cooperative means the marketing agency to, or
through which, the producer commercially markets whole milk.
Milk marketings means a marketing of milk for which there is a
verifiable sales or delivery record of milk marketed for commercial
use. In counting milk toward production amounts, dumped
[[Page 56116]]
milk will not be considered as marketed for commercial use. Such dumped
milk shall be counted toward production but will be accounted for
separately from milk that is marketed for normal commercial use as
determined by the Deputy Administrator. All production in the months
for which loss coverage is available will be counted in making
determinations under this part, as determined by the Deputy
Administrator, with care to avoid double counting, and with care to
avoid a calculated loss that overstates the actual losses.
Payment pounds means the pounds of milk production from a dairy
operation for which the dairy producer is eligible to be paid under
this subpart.
Producer means any individual, group of individuals, partnership,
corporation, estate, trust association, cooperative, or other business
enterprise or other legal entity who is, or whose members are, a
citizen of, or legal resident alien in the United States, and who
directly or indirectly, as determined by the Secretary, shares in the
risk of producing milk, and makes contributions (including land, labor,
management, equipment, or capital) to the dairy farming operation of
the individual or entity of the proceeds of this operation.
Starting base production means actual commercial production
marketed by the dairy operation during the month of July 2004, or
alternative period established by the Deputy Administrator.
Verifiable production records means evidence that is used to
substantiate the amount of production marketed, including any dumped
production, and that can be verified by CCC through an independent
source.
Sec. 1430.303 Time and method of application.
(a) Dairy producers may obtain an Application, in person, by mail,
by telephone, or by facsimile from any county FSA office. In addition,
applicants may download a copy of the Application at https://
www.sc.egov.usda.gov.
(b) A request for benefits under this subpart must be submitted on
a completed Application as defined in Sec. 1430.302. Applications and
any other supporting documentation shall be submitted to the FSA county
office serving the county where the dairy operation is located but, in
any case, must be received by the FSA county office by the close of
business on the date established by the Deputy Administrator. The
closing date shall be no sooner than October 11, 2005. Applications not
received by the close of business on such date will be disapproved as
not having been timely filed and the dairy producer will not be
eligible for benefits under this program.
(c) All persons who share in the risk of a dairy operation's total
production must certify to the information on the Application before
the Application is considered complete.
(d) Each dairy producer requesting benefits under this subpart must
certify to the accuracy and truthfulness of the information provided in
their application and any supporting documentation. All information
provided is subject to verification by CCC. Refusal to allow CCC or any
other agency of the Department of Agriculture to verify any information
provided will result in a denial of eligibility. Furnishing the
information is voluntary; however, without it program benefits will not
be approved. Providing a false certification to the Government may be
punishable by imprisonment, fines and other penalties or sanctions.
Sec. 1430.304 Eligibility.
(a) Producers in the United States are eligible to receive
hurricane-related dairy disaster benefits under this part only if they
have suffered dairy production or dairy spoilage losses in counties
declared a disaster by the President due to any hurricane in 2004. To
be eligible to receive payments under this subpart, producers in a
dairy operation must:
(1) Have produced and commercially marketed milk in the United
States and commercially marketed the milk produced during the 2004
calendar year;
(2) Be a producer on a dairy farm operation physically located in a
disaster county where production and milk spoilage losses were incurred
as a result of 2004 hurricanes, and limiting their claims to losses
occurring in those counties;
(3) Provide proof of monthly milk production dumped and
commercially marketed by all persons in the eligible dairy operation
during the third quarter of the 2004 milk marketing year, or other
period as determined by FSA, to determine the total pounds of eligible
losses that will be used for payment; and
(4) Apply for payments during the application period established by
the Deputy Administrator.
(b) Payments may be made for losses suffered by an otherwise
eligible producer who is now deceased or is a dissolved entity if a
representative who currently has authority to enter into a contract for
the producer or the producer's estate signs the application for
payment. Proof of authority to sign for the deceased producer's estate
or a dissolved entity must be provided. If a producer is now a
dissolved general partnership or joint venture, all members of the
general partnership or joint venture at the time of dissolution or
their duly-authorized representatives must sign the application for
payment.
(c) Producers associated with a dairy operation must submit a
timely application and comply with terms and conditions of this
subpart, instructions issued by CCC and instructions contained in the
Application to be eligible for benefits under this subpart.
(d) As a condition to receive benefits under this part, a producer
must have been in compliance with the Highly Erodible Land Conservation
and Wetland Conservation provisions of 7 CFR part 12 for the 2004
calendar year, as applicable, and must not otherwise be barred from
receiving benefits under 7 CFR part 12 or any other law or regulation.
(e) Payments are limited to losses in eligible counties in eligible
months.
(f) All payments under this part are subject to the availability of
funds.
Sec. 1430.305 Proof of production.
(a) Evidence of production is required to establish the commercial
marketing and production history of the dairy operation so that
production and spoilage losses can be computed in accordance with Sec.
1430.306.
(b) A dairy producer must, based on the instructions issued by the
Deputy Administrator, provide adequate proof of the dairy operation's
commercial production, including any dumped production and dairy cow
purchases, for each month of the period July 2004 through October 2004,
and must specifically identify any dumped production for August through
October 2004. If a month other than July 2004 is used for base creation
purposes records for that month must be provided.
(1) A producer must certify and provide such proof as requested
that losses for which compensation is claimed were hurricane-related
and occurred in an eligible county in an eligible month.
(2) Additional supporting documentation may be requested by FSA as
necessary to verify production or spoilage losses and dairy herd
increases or decreases to the satisfaction of FSA.
(c) Adequate proof of production history of the dairy operation
under paragraph (b) of this section must be based on milk marketing
statements obtained from the dairy operation's milk handler or
marketing cooperative. Supporting documents may include, but are not
limited to: tank records, milk
[[Page 56117]]
handler records, daily milk marketings, copies of any payments received
from other sources for production or spoilage losses, or any other
documents available to confirm the production history and losses
incurred by the dairy operation.
(d) Adequate proof of dairy cow additions to the milking herd
during the eligible months can include, but are not limited to sales
receipts, invoices, State health certificates, or any other documents
available to confirm the cow purchases.
(e) All information provided to FSA by a producer is subject to
verification, spot-check and audit by FSA. Also, FSA or another CCC
representative may examine the dairy operation's production or spoilage
claims.
(f) If adequate proof of commercially-marketed production and
supporting documentation is not presented to the satisfaction of CCC or
FSA, the request for benefits will be rejected. In the case of a new
producer that had no verifiable, actual, commercial production marketed
by the dairy operation during the month of July 2004, but which
suffered eligible losses, an alternate base period may be established
by the Deputy Administrator.
Sec. 1430.306 Determination of losses incurred.
(a) Eligible payable losses are calculated on a dairy operation by
dairy operation basis and are limited to those occurring in August
through October 2004. Specifically, dairy production and spoilage
losses incurred by producers under this subpart are determined on the
established history of the dairy operation's actual commercial
production marketed from August through October 2004, and actual
production dumped or otherwise not marketed from August through October
2004, as provided by the dairy operation consistent with Sec.
1430.305. Except as otherwise provided in these regulations, the
starting base production, as defined in Sec. 1430.302, is adjusted
downward by a percentage determined by CCC to determine the base
production for the months of August through October 2004. These
adjustments are made to account for the seasonal declines that can
occur during those months. The base production for each of the months
August through October 2004 is calculated by reducing the starting base
production (July 2004, or alternate month approved by the Deputy
Administrator for new producers) as follows:
(1) August 2004 base production is the starting base production
reduced by 9 percent;
(2) September 2004 base production is the starting base production
reduced by 15 percent;
(3) October 2004 base production is the starting base production
reduced by 11 percent.
(b) The eligible dairy production losses for a dairy operation for
each of the months of August through October 2004 will be:
(1) The new base production for the dairy operation calculated
under paragraph (a) of this section less,
(2) For each such month for each dairy operation, the total of:
(i) Actual commercially-marketed production (not counting dumped
production counted under paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section); plus
(ii) The pounds of milk production dumped (whether related to the
hurricane or not), or otherwise not commercially marketed (whether
related to the hurricane or not). For dumping losses to be eligible,
they must, as with other program losses, be hurricane related, as
described under paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
(c) Actual production losses may be adjusted to the extent the
reduction in production is not certified by the producer to be the
result of the hurricane or is determined by FSA not to be hurricane-
related. Actual production, as adjusted, that exceeds the adjusted base
production will mean that the dairy operation incurred no eligible
production losses for the corresponding month as a result of the
hurricane disaster, and that the production level for that month does
not qualify for a payment under this program.
(d) Eligible dairy spoilage losses incurred by producers under this
subpart for each of the months August through October 2004 will be
determined based on actual milk produced in those months that was
dumped on the farm as a result of the 2004 hurricanes. Proper
documentation of milk dumped on the farm as a result of spoilage due to
a hurricane must be provided to CCC as provided in Sec. 1430.305.
(e) Calculated production losses may be adjusted by FSA based on
the monthly average of daily dairy cow additions or reductions to the
milking herd during the period of July 1, 2004 through October 31,
2004, to account for production adjustments as a result of dairy cow
purchases, sales, or death losses. Production adjustments can be
calculated using the average number of dairy cows in a dairy
operation's milking herd and the average production per cow during each
applicable month. Per-cow production averages during the months of
August through October will be determined based on the actual per-cow
production average during the month of July 2004 and reduced downward
according to the seasonal decline percentages provided in paragraph (a)
of this section, to determine the total production that may be credited
back to the dairy operation's total production losses. To qualify for
the production adjustment:
(1) Producers in eligible dairy operations must report any
increases or decreases to the dairy cow milking herd during the period
of July 1, 2004 through October 31, 2004.
(2) Adequate supporting documentation according to Sec. 1430.305
must be provided to the satisfaction of the COC to verify any claims of
herd increases or decreases during the eligible period.
(3) Any cows purchased during the eligible period that would
increase the dairy cow milking herd must have been to offset production
losses as a result of the 2004 hurricanes.
(f) Eligible production and spoilage losses as otherwise determined
under paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section are added together to
determine total eligible losses incurred by the dairy operation subject
to all other eligibility requirements as may be included in this part
or elsewhere.
(g) Payment on eligible dairy operation losses is calculated using
whole pounds of milk. No double counting is permitted, and only one
payment will be made for each pound of milk calculated as an eligible
loss after the distribution of the operation's eligible production loss
among the producers of the dairy operation according to Sec.
1420.307(b). Payments under this part will not be affected by any
payments for dumped or spoiled milk that the dairy operation may have
received from its milk handler, or marketing cooperative, or any other
private party.
(h) If a producer is eligible to receive payments under this part
and benefits under any other program administered by the Secretary for
the same losses, the producer must choose whether to receive the other
program benefits or payments under this part, but shall not be eligible
for both. The limitation on multiple benefits prohibits a producer from
being compensated more than once for the same losses. If the other USDA
program benefits are not available until after an application for
benefits has been filed under this part, the producer may, to avoid
this restriction on such other benefits, refund the total amount of the
payment to the administrative FSA
[[Page 56118]]
office from which the payment was received.
Sec. 1430.307 Rate of payment and limitations on funding.
(a) Subject to the availability of funds, the payment rate for
eligible production and spoilage losses determined according to Sec.
1430.306 is, depending on the State, the average monthly Mailbox milk
price for the Florida, the Southeast, or the Appalachian States
Marketing Orders as reported by the Agricultural Marketing Service
during the months of August, September, and October of 2004. Maximum
payment rates for eligible losses for dairy operations located in
specific states are as follows:
(1) Florida--$17.62 per hundredweight ($0.1762 per pound).
(2) Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Mississippi--$16.26 per
hundredweight ($0.1626 per pound).
(3) North Carolina and South Carolina--$15.59 per hundredweight
($0.1559 per pound).
(b) Subject to the availability of funds, each eligible dairy
operation's payment is calculated by multiplying the applicable payment
rate under paragraph (a) of this section by the operation's total
eligible losses. Where there are multiple producers in the dairy
operation, individual producers' payments are disbursed according to
each producer's share of the dairy operation's production as specified
in the Application.
(c) If the total value of losses claimed under paragraph (b) of
this section exceeds the $10 million available for the 2004 Dairy
Disaster Assistance Payment Program, less any reserve that may be
created under paragraph (e) of this section, total eligible losses of
individual dairy operations that, as calculated as an overall
percentage for the full three month period, August-October 2004 (not a
monthly average for any one month), are greater than 20 percent of the
total base production for those three months will be paid at the
maximum rate under paragraph (a) of this section to the extent
available funding allows. A loss of over 20 percent in only one or two
of the eligible months does not itself qualify for the maximum per-
pound payment. Total eligible losses for a producer, as calculated
under Sec. 1430.306, of less than or equal to 20 percent during the
eligibility period of August to October 2004 will be paid at a rate
determined by dividing the eligible losses of less than 20 percent by
the funds remaining after making payments for all eligible losses above
the 20 percent threshold.
(d) In no event shall the payment exceed the value determined by
multiplying the producer's total eligible loss times the average price
received for commercial milk production in their area as defined in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(e) A reserve may be created to handle claims that extend beyond
the conclusion of the application period, but claims shall not be
payable once the available funding is expended.
Sec. 1430.308 Availability of funds.
The total available program funds shall be $10 million as provided
by section 103 of Division B of Public Law 108-324.
Sec. 1430.309 Appeals.
Any producer who is dissatisfied with a determination made pursuant
to this subpart may request reconsideration or appeal of such
determination in accordance with the appeal regulations set forth at 7
CFR parts 11 and 780. Appeals of determinations of ineligibility or
payment amounts are subject to the limitations in Sec. Sec. 1430.307
and 1430.308.
Sec. 1430.310 Misrepresentation and scheme or device.
(a) In addition to other penalties, sanctions or remedies as may
apply, a dairy producer shall be ineligible to receive assistance under
this program if the producer is determined by FSA or CCC to have:
(1) Adopted any scheme or device that tends to defeat the purpose
of this program;
(2) Made any fraudulent representation; or
(3) Misrepresented any fact affecting a program determination.
(b) Any funds disbursed pursuant to this part to any person or
operation engaged in a misrepresentation, scheme, or device, shall be
refunded with interest together with such other sums as may become due.
Any dairy operation or person engaged in acts prohibited by this
section and any dairy operation or person receiving payment under this
subpart shall be jointly and severally liable with other persons or
operations involved in such claim for benefits for any refund due under
this section and for related charges. The remedies provided in this
subpart shall be in addition to other civil, criminal, or
administrative remedies that may apply.
Sec. 1430.311 Death, incompetence, or disappearance.
In the case of death, incompetency, disappearance, or dissolution
of a person that is eligible to receive benefits in accordance with
this subpart, such alternate person or persons specified in 7 CFR part
707 may receive such benefits, as determined appropriate by FSA.
Sec. 1430.312 Maintaining records.
Persons applying for benefits under this program must maintain
records and accounts to document all eligibility requirements specified
herein. Such records and accounts must be retained for 3 years after
the date of payment to the dairy operations under this program.
Destruction of the records after such date shall be at the risk of the
party undertaking the destruction.
Sec. 1430.313 Refunds; joint and several liability.
(a) Excess payments, payments provided as the result of erroneous
information provided by any person, or payments resulting from a
failure to comply with any requirement or condition for payment under
the application or this subpart, must be refunded to CCC.
(b) A refund required under this section shall be due with interest
determined in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section and late
payment charges as provided in 7 CFR part 1403.
(c) Persons signing a dairy operation's application as having an
interest in the operation shall be jointly and severally liable for any
refund and related charges found to be due under this section.
(d) Interest shall be applicable to any refunds required in
accordance with 7 CFR parts 792 and 1403. Such interest shall be
charged at the rate the United States Department of the Treasury
charges CCC for funds, and shall accrue from the date FSA or CCC made
the erroneous payment to the date of repayment.
(e) FSA may waive the accrual of interest if it determines that the
cause of the erroneous determination was not due to any action of the
person, or was beyond the control of the person committing the
violation. Any waiver is at the discretion of FSA alone.
Sec. 1430.314 Miscellaneous provisions.
(a) Offset. CCC may offset or withhold any amount due CCC under
this subpart in accordance with 7 CFR part 1403.
(b) Claims. Claims or debts are settled in accordance with 7 CFR
part 1403.
(c) Other interests. Payments or any portion thereof due under this
subpart shall be made without regard to questions of title under State
law and without regard to any claim or lien against the livestock, or
proceeds thereof, in favor of the owner or any other creditor except
agencies and
[[Page 56119]]
instrumentalities of the U.S. Government.
(d) Assignments. Any producer entitled to any payment under this
part may assign any payments in accordance with the provisions of 7 CFR
part 1404.
Sec. 1430.315 Termination of program.
This program ends after payment has been made to those applicants
certified as eligible pursuant to the application period established in
Sec. 1430.304. All eligibility determinations shall be final except as
otherwise determined by the Deputy Administrator.
Signed at Washington, DC, on September 13, 2005.
James R. Little,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation.
[FR Doc. 05-19127 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P