Update and Clarify a Shell Egg Grading Definition, 56139-56140 [05-19087]
Download as PDF
56139
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 185
Monday, September 26, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 56 and 57
[Docket No. PY–05–003]
RIN 0581–AC47
Update and Clarify a Shell Egg Grading
Definition
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) proposes to amend the
regulations governing the voluntary
shell egg grading program and the
regulations governing the inspection of
eggs. The proposed revision would
revise the definition of washed
ungraded eggs in each of the
regulations. From time to time, sections
in the regulations are affected by
changes in egg production and
processing technology. This rule
updates the regulations to reflect these
changes.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule to David
Bowden, Jr., Chief, Standardization
Branch, Poultry Programs, Agricultural
Marketing Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Stop 0259, room 3944—
South, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250. Comments
may be faxed to (202) 690–0941.
Comments should be submitted in
duplicate. Comments may also be
submitted electronically to:
AMSPYDockets@usda.gov or
www.regulations.gov. All comments
should refer to Docket No. PY–05–003
and note the date and page number of
this issue of the Federal Register. All
comments received will be made
available for public inspection at the
above location during regular business
hours. Comments received also will be
made available over the Internet in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:40 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
rulemaking section of the AMS Web site
https://www.ams.usda.gov/rulemaking.
A copy of this proposed rule may be
found at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
poultry/regulations/rulemaking/
index.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles L. Johnson, Chief, Grading
Branch, (202) 720–3271.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Proposed Changes
AMS administers a voluntary grading
program for shell eggs under the
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as
amended (AMA) (7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.).
Any interested party that applies for
service must comply with the terms and
conditions of the regulations and must
pay for the services rendered. AMS
graders monitor processing operations
and verify the grade and size of eggs
packed into packages bearing the USDA
grademark. Regulations governing this
program are contained in 7 CFR part 56.
AMS also administers a mandatory
inspection program for shell eggs under
the Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA)
(21 U.S.C. 1031 et seq.). This inspection
program ensures that shell eggs sold to
consumers contain no more restricted
eggs than are permitted in the standards
for consumer grades. Regulations
governing this program are contained in
7 CFR part 57.
The Agency routinely reviews its
regulations to ensure that they are
current and up-to-date. The latest
review of 7 CFR part 56 and 7 CFR part
57 identified the following changes that
are needed to bring the regulations upto-date with current egg production and
processing technology.
Washed Ungraded Eggs
The Agency is proposing to clarify the
definition of washed ungraded eggs that
appears in both regulations. The
definitions currently state that washed
ungraded eggs mean ‘‘* * * eggs which
have been washed but not sized or
segregated for quality.’’ The revised
definitions will state that washed
ungraded eggs mean ‘‘* * * eggs which
have been washed and that are either
sized or unsized, but not segregated for
quality.’’
In many in-line shell egg production
facilities, shell eggs move continuously
from a laying house to the processing
operation. Frequently, eggs move
through washing equipment and are
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
segregated to remove obvious defects
(leakers, dirts, etc.) but are not graded or
segregated for quality. The resultant
shell eggs may no longer be labeled or
designated as ‘‘nest-run’’ because they
have been washed.
Similar to nest-run shell eggs,
washed, ungraded, unsized product is
not subject to inspection under the EPIA
during a shell egg surveillance
inspection unless the product is being
offered for consumer sale. Washed,
ungraded, unsized product, which is not
intended for sale to consumers, is sold
to official breaking plants or is
reprocessed and graded at a shell egg
grading facility for consumer sales.
In the early 1990s, Poultry Programs
determined that a name designation was
needed to reference and label washed,
ungraded, unsized shell eggs. Since the
product did not meet the criteria for
nest-run eggs, Poultry Programs
proposed establishing a category of shell
eggs known as ‘‘washed ungraded eggs’’
to mean eggs that were washed, unsized,
and not segregated for quality.
In 1995 through notice and comment
rulemaking, Poultry Programs amended
the voluntary shell egg regulations at 7
CFR part 56 and defined shell eggs that
have been washed but not segregated for
grade or size to mean ‘‘washed ungraded
eggs’’. This definition has worked well;
however, as production and processing
practices have changed, many in-line
shell egg production facilities now
segregate washed ungraded eggs by size.
Consequently, the resultant washed,
ungraded, sized eggs are not clearly
defined by the regulations. The current
definition of washed ungraded eggs
needs to be revised to include eggs that
may either be sized or unsized. This
revision will clarify that this product is
to be reprocessed and graded and is not
intended for sale to consumers.
Since washed ungraded, sized shell
eggs do not meet the criteria under the
definition of washed ungraded eggs, we
propose to revise the definition for
washed ungraded eggs to mean eggs that
are washed, sized or unsized, but not
segregated for quality.
The revision is necessary to facilitate
the trading, certification, and
identification of shell eggs from
processing facilities when shell eggs
move from laying houses to processing
facilities without being graded.
E:\FR\FM\26SEP1.SGM
26SEP1
56140
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Executive Order 12866 and Effect on
Small Entities
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). In
addition, pursuant to requirements set
forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), AMS has
considered the economic impact of the
rule on small entities and has
determined that its provisions would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) defines small
entities that produce and process
chicken eggs as those whose annual
receipts are less than $9,000,000.
Approximately 625,000 egg laying hens
are needed to produce enough eggs to
gross $9,000,000.
Currently, the AMA authorizes a
voluntary grading program for shell
eggs. Shell egg processors that apply for
service must pay for the services
rendered. Shell egg processors are
entitled to pack their eggs in packages
bearing the USDA grade shield when
AMS graders are present to certify that
the eggs meet the grade requirements as
labeled. Plants in which these grading
services are performed are called official
plants. Shell egg processors who do not
use USDA’s grading service may not use
the USDA grademark. There are about
540 shell egg processors registered with
the Department that have 3,000 or more
laying hens. Of these, 161 are official
plants that use USDA’s grading service
and would be subject to this proposed
rule. Of these 161 official plants, 38
meet the small business definition.
The EPIA authorizes the mandatory
inspection of egg products operations
and the mandatory surveillance of the
disposition of shell eggs that are
undesirable for human consumption,
with implementing regulations in 7 CFR
part 57. All of the approximate 540 shell
egg processors registered with the
Department are required to comply with
the labeling provisions of the EPIA and
would be subject to this proposed rule.
Of these 540 shell egg processors, 313
meet the small business definition.
This proposal will not have an
adverse economic impact on processors.
It would revise the AMA and the EPIA
regulations by up-dating the definition
of washed ungraded eggs to reflect
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:40 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
current egg production and processing
technology.
For the above reasons, the Agency has
certified that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Executive Orders 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This action is not
intended to have retroactive effect. This
rule will not preempt any State or local
laws, regulations, or policies, unless
they present an irreconcilable conflict
with this rule. There are no
administrative procedures which must
be exhausted prior to any judicial
challenge to the provisions of this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has approved the
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements included in
this proposed rule, and there are no new
requirements. The assigned OMB
control number is 0581–0128.
AMS is committed to compliance
with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act, which requires
Government agencies in general to
provide the public the option of
submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible.
List of Subjects
Eggs and egg products, Food grades
and standards, Food labeling, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
7 CFR Part 57
Eggs and egg products, Exports, Food
grades and standards, Food labeling,
Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
it is proposed that 7 CFR parts 56 and
57 be amended as follows:
PART 56—VOLUNTARY GRADING OF
SHELL EGGS
1. The authority citation for part 56
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
2. In § 56.1, revise the term Washed
ungraded eggs to read as follows:
§ 56.1 Meaning of words and terms
defined.
*
*
*
*
*
Washed ungraded eggs means eggs
which have been washed and that are
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
PART 57—INSPECTION OF EGGS
(EGGS PRODUCTS INSPECTION ACT)
3. The authority citation for part 57
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 1031–1056.
4. In § 57.1, revise the term Washed
ungraded eggs to read as follows:
§ 57.1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Washed ungraded eggs means eggs
which have been washed and that are
either sized or unsized, but not
segregated for quality.
Dated: September 20, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–19087 Filed 9–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2003–SW–10–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
France Model AS355E, F, F1, F2, and
N Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
7 CFR Part 56
PO 00000
either sized or unsized, but not
segregated for quality.
Sfmt 4702
SUMMARY: This document proposes to
revise an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) for the specified
Eurocopter France (ECF) model
helicopters. That AD currently requires
certain checks of the magnetic chip
detector plug (chip detector) and the
main gearbox (MGB) oil-sight glass,
certain inspections of the lubrication
pump (pump), and replacing the MGB
and the pump with an airworthy MGB
and pump, if necessary. Also, the AD
requires that before an MGB or pump
with any time-in-service (TIS) can be
installed, it must meet the AD
requirements. This action would retain
those requirements but would limit the
applicability to one part number with
certain serial-numbered pumps or
modified after a certain date. This
proposal was prompted by an
investigation by the manufacturer that
revealed a malfunction occurred after
modifying the pump case on certain
pumps after major overhaul and repairs.
E:\FR\FM\26SEP1.SGM
26SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 185 (Monday, September 26, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56139-56140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19087]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 56139]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 56 and 57
[Docket No. PY-05-003]
RIN 0581-AC47
Update and Clarify a Shell Egg Grading Definition
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) proposes to amend the
regulations governing the voluntary shell egg grading program and the
regulations governing the inspection of eggs. The proposed revision
would revise the definition of washed ungraded eggs in each of the
regulations. From time to time, sections in the regulations are
affected by changes in egg production and processing technology. This
rule updates the regulations to reflect these changes.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule to David Bowden, Jr., Chief,
Standardization Branch, Poultry Programs, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stop 0259, room 3944--South,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250. Comments may be
faxed to (202) 690-0941. Comments should be submitted in duplicate.
Comments may also be submitted electronically to: AMSPYDockets@usda.gov
or www.regulations.gov. All comments should refer to Docket No. PY-05-
003 and note the date and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register. All comments received will be made available for public
inspection at the above location during regular business hours.
Comments received also will be made available over the Internet in the
rulemaking section of the AMS Web site https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rulemaking. A copy of this proposed rule may be found at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/poultry/regulations/rulemaking/index.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles L. Johnson, Chief, Grading
Branch, (202) 720-3271.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Proposed Changes
AMS administers a voluntary grading program for shell eggs under
the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended (AMA) (7 U.S.C. 1621
et seq.). Any interested party that applies for service must comply
with the terms and conditions of the regulations and must pay for the
services rendered. AMS graders monitor processing operations and verify
the grade and size of eggs packed into packages bearing the USDA
grademark. Regulations governing this program are contained in 7 CFR
part 56.
AMS also administers a mandatory inspection program for shell eggs
under the Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA) (21 U.S.C. 1031 et seq.).
This inspection program ensures that shell eggs sold to consumers
contain no more restricted eggs than are permitted in the standards for
consumer grades. Regulations governing this program are contained in 7
CFR part 57.
The Agency routinely reviews its regulations to ensure that they
are current and up-to-date. The latest review of 7 CFR part 56 and 7
CFR part 57 identified the following changes that are needed to bring
the regulations up-to-date with current egg production and processing
technology.
Washed Ungraded Eggs
The Agency is proposing to clarify the definition of washed
ungraded eggs that appears in both regulations. The definitions
currently state that washed ungraded eggs mean ``* * * eggs which have
been washed but not sized or segregated for quality.'' The revised
definitions will state that washed ungraded eggs mean ``* * * eggs
which have been washed and that are either sized or unsized, but not
segregated for quality.''
In many in-line shell egg production facilities, shell eggs move
continuously from a laying house to the processing operation.
Frequently, eggs move through washing equipment and are segregated to
remove obvious defects (leakers, dirts, etc.) but are not graded or
segregated for quality. The resultant shell eggs may no longer be
labeled or designated as ``nest-run'' because they have been washed.
Similar to nest-run shell eggs, washed, ungraded, unsized product
is not subject to inspection under the EPIA during a shell egg
surveillance inspection unless the product is being offered for
consumer sale. Washed, ungraded, unsized product, which is not intended
for sale to consumers, is sold to official breaking plants or is
reprocessed and graded at a shell egg grading facility for consumer
sales.
In the early 1990s, Poultry Programs determined that a name
designation was needed to reference and label washed, ungraded, unsized
shell eggs. Since the product did not meet the criteria for nest-run
eggs, Poultry Programs proposed establishing a category of shell eggs
known as ``washed ungraded eggs'' to mean eggs that were washed,
unsized, and not segregated for quality.
In 1995 through notice and comment rulemaking, Poultry Programs
amended the voluntary shell egg regulations at 7 CFR part 56 and
defined shell eggs that have been washed but not segregated for grade
or size to mean ``washed ungraded eggs''. This definition has worked
well; however, as production and processing practices have changed,
many in-line shell egg production facilities now segregate washed
ungraded eggs by size.
Consequently, the resultant washed, ungraded, sized eggs are not
clearly defined by the regulations. The current definition of washed
ungraded eggs needs to be revised to include eggs that may either be
sized or unsized. This revision will clarify that this product is to be
reprocessed and graded and is not intended for sale to consumers.
Since washed ungraded, sized shell eggs do not meet the criteria
under the definition of washed ungraded eggs, we propose to revise the
definition for washed ungraded eggs to mean eggs that are washed, sized
or unsized, but not segregated for quality.
The revision is necessary to facilitate the trading, certification,
and identification of shell eggs from processing facilities when shell
eggs move from laying houses to processing facilities without being
graded.
[[Page 56140]]
Executive Order 12866 and Effect on Small Entities
This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). In addition, pursuant to
requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), AMS has considered the economic impact of the rule
on small entities and has determined that its provisions would not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) defines small entities that
produce and process chicken eggs as those whose annual receipts are
less than $9,000,000. Approximately 625,000 egg laying hens are needed
to produce enough eggs to gross $9,000,000.
Currently, the AMA authorizes a voluntary grading program for shell
eggs. Shell egg processors that apply for service must pay for the
services rendered. Shell egg processors are entitled to pack their eggs
in packages bearing the USDA grade shield when AMS graders are present
to certify that the eggs meet the grade requirements as labeled. Plants
in which these grading services are performed are called official
plants. Shell egg processors who do not use USDA's grading service may
not use the USDA grademark. There are about 540 shell egg processors
registered with the Department that have 3,000 or more laying hens. Of
these, 161 are official plants that use USDA's grading service and
would be subject to this proposed rule. Of these 161 official plants,
38 meet the small business definition.
The EPIA authorizes the mandatory inspection of egg products
operations and the mandatory surveillance of the disposition of shell
eggs that are undesirable for human consumption, with implementing
regulations in 7 CFR part 57. All of the approximate 540 shell egg
processors registered with the Department are required to comply with
the labeling provisions of the EPIA and would be subject to this
proposed rule. Of these 540 shell egg processors, 313 meet the small
business definition.
This proposal will not have an adverse economic impact on
processors. It would revise the AMA and the EPIA regulations by up-
dating the definition of washed ungraded eggs to reflect current egg
production and processing technology.
For the above reasons, the Agency has certified that this action
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
Executive Orders 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This action is not intended to have retroactive
effect. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule. There are no administrative procedures which
must be exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of
this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.) the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved
the information collection and recordkeeping requirements included in
this proposed rule, and there are no new requirements. The assigned OMB
control number is 0581-0128.
AMS is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act, which requires Government agencies in general to
provide the public the option of submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum extent possible.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 56
Eggs and egg products, Food grades and standards, Food labeling,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
7 CFR Part 57
Eggs and egg products, Exports, Food grades and standards, Food
labeling, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, it is proposed that 7 CFR
parts 56 and 57 be amended as follows:
PART 56--VOLUNTARY GRADING OF SHELL EGGS
1. The authority citation for part 56 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
2. In Sec. 56.1, revise the term Washed ungraded eggs to read as
follows:
Sec. 56.1 Meaning of words and terms defined.
* * * * *
Washed ungraded eggs means eggs which have been washed and that are
either sized or unsized, but not segregated for quality.
PART 57--INSPECTION OF EGGS (EGGS PRODUCTS INSPECTION ACT)
3. The authority citation for part 57 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 1031-1056.
4. In Sec. 57.1, revise the term Washed ungraded eggs to read as
follows:
Sec. 57.1 Definitions.
* * * * *
Washed ungraded eggs means eggs which have been washed and that are
either sized or unsized, but not segregated for quality.
Dated: September 20, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-19087 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P