Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rates, 56107-56111 [05-19085]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
revisions to the information collection
requirements that were previously
approved by OMB under control
number 0560–0155.
These changes affect the following
FSA programs as listed in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance:
10.406—Farm Operating Loans
10.407—Farm Ownership Loans
(b) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) As a result of the capitalization of
interest, a rescheduled promissory note
may increase the amount of principal
the borrower is required to pay.
However, in no case will such principal
amount exceed the statutory loan limits
contained in § 761.8 of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
I 6. Add § 762.159 to read as follows:
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 762
§ 762.159
Agriculture, Loan programs—
Agriculture.
I Accordingly, 7 CFR chapter VII is
amended as follows:
A lender may pledge all or part of the
guaranteed or unguaranteed portion of
the loan as security to a Federal Home
Loan Bank, a Federal Reserve Bank, a
Farm Credit System Bank, or any other
funding source determined acceptable
by the Agency.
I 7. Revise § 762.160 to read as follows:
Federal Assistance Programs
PART 762—GUARANTEED FARM
LOANS
1. The authority citation for part 762
continues to read as follows:
I
§ 762.160
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 7 U.S.C. 1989.
§ 762.102
[Amended]
2. In § 762.102 remove the definitions
of ‘‘Financially viable operation’’,
‘‘Participation’’ and ‘‘Sale of guaranteed
portion.’’
I 3. Amend § 762.106 by removing
paragraph (b)(8) and revising paragraph
(c)(8) to read as follows:
I
§ 762.106 Preferred and certified lender
programs.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(8) Designate a person or persons,
either by name, title, or position within
the organization, to process and service
PLP loans for the Agency.
*
*
*
*
*
I 4. In § 762.126, remove paragraph
(e)(1), redesignate paragraphs (e)(2),
(e)(3), and (e)(4) as (e)(1), (e)(2), and
(e)(3), respectively, and revise newly
designated (e)(2) to read as follows:
§ 762.126
Security requirements.
(e) * * *
(2) Junior lien positions are acceptable
only if the total amount of debt with
liens on the security, including the debt
in junior lien position, is less than or
equal to 85 percent of the value of the
security. Junior liens on crops or
livestock products will not be relied
upon for security unless the lender is
involved in multiple guaranteed loans
to the same borrower and also has the
first lien on the collateral.
*
*
*
*
*
I 5. Revise § 762.145 (b)(6)(i) to read as
follows:
§ 762.145
Restructuring guaranteed loans.
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
12:27 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
Pledging of guarantee.
Assignment of guarantee.
(a) The following general
requirements apply to assigning
guaranteed loans:
(1) Subject to Agency concurrence,
the lender may assign all or part of the
guaranteed portion of the loan to one or
more holders at or after loan closing, if
the loan is not in default. However, a
line of credit cannot be assigned. The
lender must always retain the
unguaranteed portion in their portfolio,
regardless of how the loan is funded.
(2) The Agency may refuse to execute
the Assignment of Guarantee and
prohibit the assignment in case of the
following:
(i) The Agency purchased and is
holder of a loan that was assigned by the
lender that is requesting the assignment.
(ii) The lender has not complied with
the reimbursement requirements of
§ 762.144(c)(7), except when the 180
day reimbursement or liquidation
requirement has been waived by the
Agency.
(3) The lender will provide the
Agency with copies of all appropriate
forms used in the assignment.
(4) The guaranteed portion of the loan
may not be assigned by the lender until
the loan has been fully disbursed to the
borrower.
(5) The lender is not permitted to
assign any amount of the guaranteed or
unguaranteed portion of the loan to the
loan applicant or borrower, or members
of their immediate families, their
officers, directors, stockholders, other
owners, or any parent, subsidiary, or
affiliate.
(6) Upon the lender’s assignment of
the guaranteed portion of the loan, the
lender will remain bound to all
obligations indicated in the Guarantee,
Lender’s Agreement, the Agency
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56107
program regulations, and to future
program regulations not inconsistent
with the provisions of the Lenders
Agreement. The lender retains all rights
under the security instruments for the
protection of the lender and the United
States.
(b) The following will occur upon the
lender’s assignment of the guaranteed
portion of the loan:
(1) The holder will succeed to all
rights of the Guarantee pertaining to the
portion of the loan assigned.
(2) The lender will send the holder
the borrower’s executed note attached to
the Guarantee.
(3) The holder, upon written notice to
the lender and the Agency, may assign
the unpaid guaranteed portion of the
loan. The holder must assign the
guaranteed portion back to the original
lender if requested for servicing or
liquidation of the account.
(4) The Guarantee or Assignment of
Guarantee in the holder’s possession
does not cover:
(i) Interest accruing 90 days after the
holder has demanded repurchase by the
lender, except as provided in the
Assignment of Guarantee and
§ 762.144(c)(3)(iii).
(ii) Interest accruing 90 days after the
lender or the Agency has requested the
holder to surrender evidence of debt
repurchase, if the holder has not
previously demanded repurchase.
(c) Negotiations concerning
premiums, fees, and additional
payments for loans are to take place
between the holder and the lender. The
Agency will participate in such
negotiations only as a provider of
information.
Signed in Washington, DC, on September
1, 2005.
James R. Little,
Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 05–19126 Filed 9–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 916 and 917
[Docket No. FV05–916–3 FR]
Nectarines and Peaches Grown in
California; Increased Assessment
Rates
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule increases the
assessment rates established for the
Nectarine Administrative Committee
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
56108
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
and the Peach Commodity Committee
(committees) for the 2005–06 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $0.195
and $0.19, respectively, to $0.20 per 25pound container or container equivalent
of nectarines and peaches handled. The
committees locally administer the
marketing orders that regulate the
handling of nectarines and peaches
grown in California. Assessments upon
nectarine and peach handlers are used
by the committees to fund reasonable
and necessary expenses of the programs.
The fiscal period runs from March 1
through the last day of February. The
assessment rates will remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective September 27, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel May, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906; or George
Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or e-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
Nos. 85 and 124 and Order Nos. 916 and
917, both as amended (7 CFR parts 916
and 917), regulating the handling of
nectarines and peaches grown in
California, respectively, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘orders.’’ The
marketing agreements and orders are
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing orders
now in effect, California nectarine and
peach handlers are subject to
assessments. Funds to administer the
orders are derived from such
assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rates as issued herein will be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:27 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
applicable to all assessable nectarines
and peaches beginning on March 1,
2005, and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Nectarine
Administrative Committee (NAC) for the
2005–06 and subsequent fiscal periods
from $0.195 to $0.20 per 25-pound
container or container equivalent of
nectarines. This rule also increases the
assessment rate established for the
Peach Commodity Committee (PCC) for
the 2005–06 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $0.19 to $0.20 per 25pound container or container equivalent
of peaches.
The nectarine and peach marketing
orders provide authority for the
committees, with the approval of USDA,
to formulate annual budgets of expenses
and collect assessments from handlers
to administer the programs. The
members of the NAC and PCC are
producers of California nectarines and
peaches, respectively. They are familiar
with the committees’ needs, and with
the costs for goods and services in their
local area and are, therefore, in a
position to formulate appropriate
budgets and assessment rates. The
assessment rates are formulated and
discussed in public meetings. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
NAC Assessment and Expenses
The NAC recommended, for the
2004–05 fiscal period, and USDA
approved, an assessment rate of $0.195
that would continue in effect from fiscal
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
period to fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the committee or other
information available to USDA.
The NAC met on April 28, 2005, and
discussed and unanimously
recommended 2005–06 expenditures
and an assessment rate of $0.20 per 25pound container or container equivalent
of nectarines. Subsequently, the NAC
revised its budget recommendation
because it anticipated higher
administrative overhead expenses than
it had forecast earlier. In a mail vote
completed on June 28, 2005, the NAC
unanimously recommended 2005–06
expenditures of $4,919,049. In
comparison, the budgeted expenditures
for 2004–05 were $5,162,866. The
assessment rate of $0.20 is $0.005 higher
than the rate currently in effect.
The rate increase was recommended
to ensure that the NAC could meet its
2005–06 anticipated expenses and carry
over a financial reserve that would
provide adequate funds for promotional
and other activities at the beginning of
the 2006 season before assessment
collections begin. Increasing the
assessment rate from $0.195 to $0.20 per
25-pound container is expected to
provide about $103,410 in additional
assessment revenue, and should allow
the NAC to start the 2006 season with
about $342,347.
Expenditures recommended by the
NAC for the 2005–06 fiscal period
include $899,288 for administration,
$1,167,381 for inspection, $203,230 for
research, and $2,649,149 for domestic
and international promotion. Budgeted
expenses for these items in 2004–05
were $538,770 for administration,
$1,153,676 for inspection, $308,568 for
research, and $3,161,852 for domestic
and international promotion.
The 2004–05 and 2005–06 budgeted
expenses differ significantly because
some individual line items have been
moved to different expense categories
for 2005–2006. However, NAC expenses
are generally expected to be lower
during the 2005–06 fiscal year
compared to the 2004–05 fiscal year.
The 2005–06 NAC assessment rate
was derived after considering
anticipated fiscal year expenses; the
estimated assessable nectarines of
22,004,000 25-pound containers or
container equivalents; the estimated
income from other sources, such as
interest; and the need for an adequate
financial reserve to carry the NAC into
the 2006 season. The committee desires
to maintain a financial reserve of
approximately $340,000 to meet its
obligations in the early part of each
season, before handler assessments are
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
billed and received. To meet these goals,
the NAC recommended an assessment
rate of $0.20 per 25-pound containers or
container equivalent. According to the
committee, that assessment rate should
result in an adequate financial reserve,
yet one well within the maximum of
approximately one year’s expenses
permitted by the order (§ 916.42).
PCC Assessment and Expenses
The PCC recommended for the 2004–
05 fiscal period, and USDA approved,
an assessment rate of $0.19 that would
continue in effect from fiscal period to
fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the committee or other
information available to USDA.
The PCC met on April 28, 2005, and
discussed and unanimously
recommended 2005–06 expenditures
and an assessment rate of $0.20 per 25pound container or container equivalent
of peaches. Subsequently, the PCC
revised its budget recommendation
because it anticipated higher
administrative overhead expenses than
it had forecast earlier. In a mail vote
completed on June 28, 2005, the PCC
unanimously recommended 2005–06
expenditures of $5,095,709. In
comparison, last year’s budgeted
expenditures were $5,178,003. The
assessment rate of $0.20 is $0.01 higher
than the rate currently in effect.
The rate increase was recommended
to ensure that the PCC could meet its
2005–06 anticipated expenses and carry
over a financial reserve that would
provide adequate funds for promotional
and other activities at the beginning of
the 2006 season before assessment
collections begin. Increasing the
assessment rate from $0.19 to $0.20 per
25-pound container is expected to
provide about $211,800 in additional
assessment revenue, and should allow
the PCC to start the 2006 season with
about $418,201.
Expenditures recommended by the
PCC for the 2005–06 fiscal period
include $918,736 for administration,
$1,260,160 for inspection, $204,833 for
research, and $2,711,980 for domestic
and international promotion. Budgeted
expenses for these items in 2004–05
were $540,456 for administration,
$1,240,520 for inspection, $208,570 for
research, and $3,188,457 for domestic
and international promotion.
The 2004–05 and 2005–06 budgeted
expenses differ because some individual
line items have been moved to different
expense categories for 2005–2006.
However, the PCC expenses are
generally expected to be lower during
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:27 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
the 2005–06 fiscal year compared to the
2004–05 fiscal year.
The 2005–06 PCC assessment rate was
derived after considering anticipated
PCC expenses; the estimated assessable
peaches of 21,180,000 25-pound
containers or container equivalents; the
estimated income from other sources,
such as interest; and the need for an
adequate reserve to carry the PCC into
the 2006 season. The committee desires
to maintain a financial reserve of
approximately $420,000 to meet its
obligations in the early part of each
season, before handler assessments are
billed and received. To meet these goals,
the PCC recommended an assessment
rate of $0.20 per 25-pound container or
container equivalent. According to the
committee, that assessment rate should
result in an adequate financial reserve,
yet one well within the maximum of
approximately one year’s expenses
permitted by the order (§ 917.38).
Continuance of Assessment Rates
The assessment rates established in
this rule will continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the committees or other
available information.
Although these assessment rates will
be in effect for an indefinite period, the
committees will continue to meet prior
to or during each fiscal period to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rates.
The dates and times of committee
meetings are available from the
committees’ Web site or USDA.
Committee meetings are open to the
public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA will evaluate the committees’
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate for
each committee is needed. Further
rulemaking will be undertaken as
necessary. The committee’s 2005–06
budget and those for subsequent fiscal
periods would be reviewed and, as
appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56109
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 210
California nectarine and peach handlers
subject to regulation under the orders
covering nectarines and peaches grown
in California, and about 1,500 producers
of these fruits in California. Small
agricultural service firms, which
include handlers, are defined by the
Small Business Administration [13 CFR
121.201] as those whose annual receipts
are less than $6,000,000. Small
agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration as
those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000. A majority of these handlers
and producers may be classified as
small entities.
The committees’ staff has estimated
that there are fewer than 26 handlers in
the industry who could be defined as
other than small entities. For the 2004
season, the committees’ staff estimated
that the average handler price received
was $8.00 per container or container
equivalent of nectarines or peaches. A
handler would have to ship at least
750,000 containers to have annual
receipts of $6,000,000. Given data on
shipments maintained by the
committees’ staff and the average
handler price received during the 2004
season, the committees’ staff estimates
that small handlers represent
approximately 87 percent of all the
handlers within the industry.
The committees’ staff has also
estimated that fewer than 20 percent of
the producers in the industry could be
defined as other than small entities. For
the 2004 season, the committees’
estimated the average producer price
received was $5.00 per container or
container equivalent for nectarines and
peaches. A producer would have to
produce at least 150,500 containers of
nectarines and peaches to have annual
receipts of $750,000. Given data
maintained by the committees’ staff and
the average producer price received
during the 2004 season, the committees’
staff estimates that small producers
represent more than 80 percent of the
producers within the industry.
With an average producer price of
$5.00 per container or container
equivalent, and a combined packout of
nectarines and peaches of 40,438,536
containers, the value of the 2004
packout is estimated to be $202,192,680.
Dividing this total estimated grower
revenue figure by the estimated number
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
56110
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
of producers (1,500) yields an estimate
of average revenue per producer of
about $134,795 from the sales of
peaches and nectarines.
This rule increases the assessment
rates established for the NAC for the
2005–06 and subsequent fiscal periods
from $0.195 to $0.20 per 25-pound
container or container equivalent of
nectarines and for the PCC for the 2005–
06 and subsequent fiscal periods from
$0.19 to $0.20 per 25-pound container
or container equivalent of peaches.
The NAC recommended 2005–06
fiscal period expenditures of $4,919,049
for nectarines and an assessment rate of
$0.20 per 25-pound container or
container equivalent of nectarines. The
assessment rate of $0.20 is $0.005 higher
than the 2004–05 rate. The PCC
recommended 2005–06 fiscal period
expenditures of $5,095,709 for peaches
and an assessments rate of $0.20 per 25pound container or container equivalent
of peaches. The assessment rate of $0.20
is $0.01 higher than the 2004–05 rate.
Analysis of NAC Budget
The quantity of assessable nectarines
for the 2005–06 fiscal period is
estimated at 20,682,000 25-pound
container or container equivalents.
Thus, the $0.20 rate should provide
$4,136,400 in assessment income.
Income derived from handler
assessments, along with interest income,
research grants, and funds from the
committee’s reserve, should be adequate
to cover budgeted expenses and
maintain their desired reserve.
The major expenditures
recommended by the NAC for the 2005–
06 year include 899,288 for
administration, $1,167,381 for
inspection, $203,230 for research, and
$2,649,149 for domestic and
international promotion. Budgeted
expenses for these items in 2004–05
were $538,770, $1,050,000, $138,018,
and $2,574,160, respectively.
The NAC recommended an increase
in the assessment rate to meet
anticipated 2005–06 expenses and
preserve an acceptable financial reserve.
A reserve of approximately $340,000 is
needed to fund expenses for the
following year until assessments for that
year are received. The NAC reviewed
and recommended 2005–06
expenditures of $4,919,049 and the
increased assessment rate.
Analysis of PCC Budget
The quantity of assessable peaches for
the 2005–06 fiscal year is estimated at
21,180,000 25-pound container or
container equivalents. Thus, the $0.20
rate should provide $4,236,000 in
assessment income. Income derived
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:27 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
from handler assessments, along with
interest income, research grants, and
funds from the committee’s reserves
should be adequate to cover budgeted
expenses and maintain their desired
reserve.
The major expenditures
recommended by the PCC for the 2005–
06 year include $918,736 for
administration, $1,260,160 for
inspection, $204,833 for research, and
$2,711,980 for domestic and
international promotion. Budgeted
expenses for these items in 2004–05
were $540,456, $1,240,520, $208,570,
and $3,188,457, respectively.
The PCC recommended an increase in
the assessment rate to meet anticipated
2005–06 expenses and preserve an
acceptable financial reserve. A reserve
of approximately $420,000 is needed to
fund expenses for the following year
until assessments for that year are
received. The PCC reviewed and
recommended 2005–06 expenditures of
$5,095,709 and the increased
assessment rate.
Considerations in Determining
Expenses and Assessment Rates
Prior to arriving at these budgets, the
committees considered information and
recommendations from various sources,
including, but not limited to: The
Executive Committee, the Research
Subcommittee, the International
Programs Subcommittee, the Grade and
Size Subcommittee, and the Domestic
Promotion Subcommittee.
Each of the committees then reviewed
the proposed expenses; the total
estimated assessable 25-pound
containers or container equivalents; and
the estimated income from other
sources, such as interest income and
research grants, prior to recommending
a final assessment rate. The NAC
decided that an assessment rate of $0.20
per 25-pound container or container
equivalent would allow it to meet its
2005–06 expenses and carry over an
operating reserve of approximately
$342,000, which is in line with the
committee’s financial needs. The PCC
decided that an assessment rate of $0.20
per 25-pound container or container
equivalent would allow it to meet its
2003–04 expenses and carry over an
operating reserve of approximately
$420,000, which is in line with the
committee’s financial needs. The
committees then unanimously
recommended these rates to USDA
A review of historical and preliminary
information pertaining to the upcoming
fiscal period indicates that the grower
price for nectarines and peaches for the
2005–06 season could range between
$4.00 and $6.00 per 25-pound container
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or container equivalent. Therefore, the
estimated assessment revenue for the
2005–06 fiscal period as a percentage of
total grower revenue could range
between 3.33 and 5.0 percent.
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
and uniform on all handlers. Some of
the additional costs may be passed on
to producers. However, these costs are
offset by the benefits derived from the
operation of the marketing orders. In
addition, the committees’ meetings were
widely publicized throughout the
California nectarine and peach
industries and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meetings and
participate in the committees’
deliberations on all issues. Like all
committee meetings, the April 28, 2004,
meetings were public meetings and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue.
This rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published n the Federal
Register on August 22, 2005 (70 FR
48900). Copies of the proposed rule
were also mailed or sent via facsimile to
all nectarine and peach handlers.
Finally, the proposal was made
available through the Internet by USDA
and the Office of the Federal Register. A
10-day comment period ending
September 1, 2005, was provided for
interested persons to respond to the
proposal. Two comments supporting the
proposal were received. Both cited
reduced crop yields and the need to
fund pre-harvest expenses next year as
justification for the assessment rate
increases. An additional response was
received, but it was not relevant to the
proposed assessment increase.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185 / Monday, September 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
submitted by the NAC and PCC and
other available information, it is hereby
found that this rule, as hereinafter set
forth, will tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) The 2005–06 fiscal period
began on March 1, 2005, and the
marketing orders require that the
assessment rates for each fiscal period
apply to all nectarines and peaches
handled during such fiscal period; (2)
the committees need to have sufficient
funds to pay their expenses, which are
incurred on a continuous basis; and (3)
handlers are aware of this action, which
was discussed by the committees at
public meetings and unanimously
recommended by a mail vote, and is
similar to other assessment rate actions
issued in past years. Also, a 10-day
comment period was provided for in the
proposed rule and the comments
received have been considered in
reaching a final decision on this matter.
§ 917.258
Assessment rate.
On and after March 1, 2005, an
assessment rate of $0.20 per 25-pound
container or container equivalent of
peaches is established for California
peaches.
Dated: September 20, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–19085 Filed 9–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1033
[Docket No. AO–166–A39; DA–05–01–A]
Milk in the Mideast Marketing Area;
Interim Order Amending the Order
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
AGENCY:
Marketing agreements, Nectarines,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
SUMMARY: This order amends certain
features of the pooling standards of the
Mideast milk marketing order on an
interim basis. More than the required
number of producers in the Mideast
marketing area have approved the
issuance of the interim order as
amended.
7 CFR Part 917
DATES:
Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 916
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR parts 916 and 917 are
amended as follows:
I 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
parts 916 and 917 continue to read as
follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
PART 916—NECTARINES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
2. Section 916.234 is revised to read
as follows:
I
§ 916.234
Assessment rate.
On and after March 1, 2005, an
assessment rate of $0.20 per 25-pound
container or container equivalent of
nectarines is established for California
nectarines.
PART 917—PEACHES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
3. Section 917.258 is revised to read
as follows:
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:27 Sep 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
Effective October 1, 2005.
Gino M. Tosi, Associate Deputy
Administrator, Stop 0231, Room 2971,
USDA/AMS/Dairy Programs, Order
Formulation and Enforcement Branch,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0231, (202) 690–
1366, e-mail address:
gino.tosi@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Specifically, this decision adopts
provisions that will: (1) Prohibit the
ability to simultaneously pool the same
milk on the Mideast Federal milk order
and on a marketwide equalization pool
administered by another government
entity; (2) Lower the diversion limit
standards; and (3) Increase the
performance standards for supply
plants.
This administrative rule is governed
by the provisions of sections 556 and
557 of title 5 of the United States Code
and, therefore, is excluded from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
This interim rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have a retroactive effect. This rule
will not preempt any State or local laws,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56111
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937 (the Act), as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), provides
that administrative proceedings must be
exhausted before parties may file suit in
court. Under Section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may
request modification or exemption from
such order by filing with the
Department of Agriculture (Department)
a petition stating that the order, any
provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is
not in accordance with the law. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After a
hearing, the Department would rule on
the petition. The Act provides that the
District Court of the United States in
any district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has its principal place of
business, has jurisdiction in equity to
review the Department’s ruling on the
petition, provided a bill in equity is
filed not later than 20 days after the date
of the entry of the ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the
Agricultural Marketing Service has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities and has certified
that this interim rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. For
the purpose of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, a dairy farm is considered a ‘‘small
business’’ if it has an annual gross
revenue of less than $750,000, and a
dairy products manufacturer is a ‘‘small
business’’ if it has fewer than 500
employees.
For the purposes of determining
which dairy farms are ‘‘small
businesses,’’ the $750,000 per year
criterion was used to establish a
production guideline of 500,000 pounds
per month. Although this guideline does
not factor in additional monies that may
be received by dairy producers, it
should be an inclusive standard for
most ‘‘small’’ dairy farmers. For
purposes of determining a handler’s
size, if the plant is part of a larger
company operating multiple plants that
collectively exceed the 500-employee
limit, the plant will be considered a
large business even if the local plant has
fewer than 500 employees.
During March 2005, the month during
which the hearing occurred, there were
9,767 dairy producers pooled on, and 36
handlers regulated by, the Mideast
order. Approximately 9,212 producers,
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 185 (Monday, September 26, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56107-56111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19085]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 916 and 917
[Docket No. FV05-916-3 FR]
Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Increased Assessment
Rates
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule increases the assessment rates established for the
Nectarine Administrative Committee
[[Page 56108]]
and the Peach Commodity Committee (committees) for the 2005-06 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $0.195 and $0.19, respectively, to $0.20
per 25-pound container or container equivalent of nectarines and
peaches handled. The committees locally administer the marketing orders
that regulate the handling of nectarines and peaches grown in
California. Assessments upon nectarine and peach handlers are used by
the committees to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the
programs. The fiscal period runs from March 1 through the last day of
February. The assessment rates will remain in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective September 27, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel May, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906; or
George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or e-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement Nos. 85 and 124 and Order Nos. 916 and 917, both as amended
(7 CFR parts 916 and 917), regulating the handling of nectarines and
peaches grown in California, respectively, hereinafter referred to as
the ``orders.'' The marketing agreements and orders are effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C.
601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing orders now in effect, California
nectarine and peach handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the orders are derived from such assessments. It is intended
that the assessment rates as issued herein will be applicable to all
assessable nectarines and peaches beginning on March 1, 2005, and
continue until amended, suspended, or terminated. This rule will not
preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Nectarine Administrative Committee (NAC) for the 2005-06 and subsequent
fiscal periods from $0.195 to $0.20 per 25-pound container or container
equivalent of nectarines. This rule also increases the assessment rate
established for the Peach Commodity Committee (PCC) for the 2005-06 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $0.19 to $0.20 per 25-pound container or
container equivalent of peaches.
The nectarine and peach marketing orders provide authority for the
committees, with the approval of USDA, to formulate annual budgets of
expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the
programs. The members of the NAC and PCC are producers of California
nectarines and peaches, respectively. They are familiar with the
committees' needs, and with the costs for goods and services in their
local area and are, therefore, in a position to formulate appropriate
budgets and assessment rates. The assessment rates are formulated and
discussed in public meetings. Thus, all directly affected persons have
an opportunity to participate and provide input.
NAC Assessment and Expenses
The NAC recommended, for the 2004-05 fiscal period, and USDA
approved, an assessment rate of $0.195 that would continue in effect
from fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the
committee or other information available to USDA.
The NAC met on April 28, 2005, and discussed and unanimously
recommended 2005-06 expenditures and an assessment rate of $0.20 per
25-pound container or container equivalent of nectarines. Subsequently,
the NAC revised its budget recommendation because it anticipated higher
administrative overhead expenses than it had forecast earlier. In a
mail vote completed on June 28, 2005, the NAC unanimously recommended
2005-06 expenditures of $4,919,049. In comparison, the budgeted
expenditures for 2004-05 were $5,162,866. The assessment rate of $0.20
is $0.005 higher than the rate currently in effect.
The rate increase was recommended to ensure that the NAC could meet
its 2005-06 anticipated expenses and carry over a financial reserve
that would provide adequate funds for promotional and other activities
at the beginning of the 2006 season before assessment collections
begin. Increasing the assessment rate from $0.195 to $0.20 per 25-pound
container is expected to provide about $103,410 in additional
assessment revenue, and should allow the NAC to start the 2006 season
with about $342,347.
Expenditures recommended by the NAC for the 2005-06 fiscal period
include $899,288 for administration, $1,167,381 for inspection,
$203,230 for research, and $2,649,149 for domestic and international
promotion. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2004-05 were $538,770
for administration, $1,153,676 for inspection, $308,568 for research,
and $3,161,852 for domestic and international promotion.
The 2004-05 and 2005-06 budgeted expenses differ significantly
because some individual line items have been moved to different expense
categories for 2005-2006. However, NAC expenses are generally expected
to be lower during the 2005-06 fiscal year compared to the 2004-05
fiscal year.
The 2005-06 NAC assessment rate was derived after considering
anticipated fiscal year expenses; the estimated assessable nectarines
of 22,004,000 25-pound containers or container equivalents; the
estimated income from other sources, such as interest; and the need for
an adequate financial reserve to carry the NAC into the 2006 season.
The committee desires to maintain a financial reserve of approximately
$340,000 to meet its obligations in the early part of each season,
before handler assessments are
[[Page 56109]]
billed and received. To meet these goals, the NAC recommended an
assessment rate of $0.20 per 25-pound containers or container
equivalent. According to the committee, that assessment rate should
result in an adequate financial reserve, yet one well within the
maximum of approximately one year's expenses permitted by the order
(Sec. 916.42).
PCC Assessment and Expenses
The PCC recommended for the 2004-05 fiscal period, and USDA
approved, an assessment rate of $0.19 that would continue in effect
from fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the
committee or other information available to USDA.
The PCC met on April 28, 2005, and discussed and unanimously
recommended 2005-06 expenditures and an assessment rate of $0.20 per
25-pound container or container equivalent of peaches. Subsequently,
the PCC revised its budget recommendation because it anticipated higher
administrative overhead expenses than it had forecast earlier. In a
mail vote completed on June 28, 2005, the PCC unanimously recommended
2005-06 expenditures of $5,095,709. In comparison, last year's budgeted
expenditures were $5,178,003. The assessment rate of $0.20 is $0.01
higher than the rate currently in effect.
The rate increase was recommended to ensure that the PCC could meet
its 2005-06 anticipated expenses and carry over a financial reserve
that would provide adequate funds for promotional and other activities
at the beginning of the 2006 season before assessment collections
begin. Increasing the assessment rate from $0.19 to $0.20 per 25-pound
container is expected to provide about $211,800 in additional
assessment revenue, and should allow the PCC to start the 2006 season
with about $418,201.
Expenditures recommended by the PCC for the 2005-06 fiscal period
include $918,736 for administration, $1,260,160 for inspection,
$204,833 for research, and $2,711,980 for domestic and international
promotion. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2004-05 were $540,456
for administration, $1,240,520 for inspection, $208,570 for research,
and $3,188,457 for domestic and international promotion.
The 2004-05 and 2005-06 budgeted expenses differ because some
individual line items have been moved to different expense categories
for 2005-2006. However, the PCC expenses are generally expected to be
lower during the 2005-06 fiscal year compared to the 2004-05 fiscal
year.
The 2005-06 PCC assessment rate was derived after considering
anticipated PCC expenses; the estimated assessable peaches of
21,180,000 25-pound containers or container equivalents; the estimated
income from other sources, such as interest; and the need for an
adequate reserve to carry the PCC into the 2006 season. The committee
desires to maintain a financial reserve of approximately $420,000 to
meet its obligations in the early part of each season, before handler
assessments are billed and received. To meet these goals, the PCC
recommended an assessment rate of $0.20 per 25-pound container or
container equivalent. According to the committee, that assessment rate
should result in an adequate financial reserve, yet one well within the
maximum of approximately one year's expenses permitted by the order
(Sec. 917.38).
Continuance of Assessment Rates
The assessment rates established in this rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the committees or
other available information.
Although these assessment rates will be in effect for an indefinite
period, the committees will continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rates. The dates and
times of committee meetings are available from the committees' Web site
or USDA. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested
persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate
the committees' recommendations and other available information to
determine whether modification of the assessment rate for each
committee is needed. Further rulemaking will be undertaken as
necessary. The committee's 2005-06 budget and those for subsequent
fiscal periods would be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 210 California nectarine and peach handlers
subject to regulation under the orders covering nectarines and peaches
grown in California, and about 1,500 producers of these fruits in
California. Small agricultural service firms, which include handlers,
are defined by the Small Business Administration [13 CFR 121.201] as
those whose annual receipts are less than $6,000,000. Small
agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration
as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000. A majority of
these handlers and producers may be classified as small entities.
The committees' staff has estimated that there are fewer than 26
handlers in the industry who could be defined as other than small
entities. For the 2004 season, the committees' staff estimated that the
average handler price received was $8.00 per container or container
equivalent of nectarines or peaches. A handler would have to ship at
least 750,000 containers to have annual receipts of $6,000,000. Given
data on shipments maintained by the committees' staff and the average
handler price received during the 2004 season, the committees' staff
estimates that small handlers represent approximately 87 percent of all
the handlers within the industry.
The committees' staff has also estimated that fewer than 20 percent
of the producers in the industry could be defined as other than small
entities. For the 2004 season, the committees' estimated the average
producer price received was $5.00 per container or container equivalent
for nectarines and peaches. A producer would have to produce at least
150,500 containers of nectarines and peaches to have annual receipts of
$750,000. Given data maintained by the committees' staff and the
average producer price received during the 2004 season, the committees'
staff estimates that small producers represent more than 80 percent of
the producers within the industry.
With an average producer price of $5.00 per container or container
equivalent, and a combined packout of nectarines and peaches of
40,438,536 containers, the value of the 2004 packout is estimated to be
$202,192,680. Dividing this total estimated grower revenue figure by
the estimated number
[[Page 56110]]
of producers (1,500) yields an estimate of average revenue per producer
of about $134,795 from the sales of peaches and nectarines.
This rule increases the assessment rates established for the NAC
for the 2005-06 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.195 to $0.20 per
25-pound container or container equivalent of nectarines and for the
PCC for the 2005-06 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.19 to $0.20
per 25-pound container or container equivalent of peaches.
The NAC recommended 2005-06 fiscal period expenditures of
$4,919,049 for nectarines and an assessment rate of $0.20 per 25-pound
container or container equivalent of nectarines. The assessment rate of
$0.20 is $0.005 higher than the 2004-05 rate. The PCC recommended 2005-
06 fiscal period expenditures of $5,095,709 for peaches and an
assessments rate of $0.20 per 25-pound container or container
equivalent of peaches. The assessment rate of $0.20 is $0.01 higher
than the 2004-05 rate.
Analysis of NAC Budget
The quantity of assessable nectarines for the 2005-06 fiscal period
is estimated at 20,682,000 25-pound container or container equivalents.
Thus, the $0.20 rate should provide $4,136,400 in assessment income.
Income derived from handler assessments, along with interest income,
research grants, and funds from the committee's reserve, should be
adequate to cover budgeted expenses and maintain their desired reserve.
The major expenditures recommended by the NAC for the 2005-06 year
include 899,288 for administration, $1,167,381 for inspection, $203,230
for research, and $2,649,149 for domestic and international promotion.
Budgeted expenses for these items in 2004-05 were $538,770, $1,050,000,
$138,018, and $2,574,160, respectively.
The NAC recommended an increase in the assessment rate to meet
anticipated 2005-06 expenses and preserve an acceptable financial
reserve. A reserve of approximately $340,000 is needed to fund expenses
for the following year until assessments for that year are received.
The NAC reviewed and recommended 2005-06 expenditures of $4,919,049 and
the increased assessment rate.
Analysis of PCC Budget
The quantity of assessable peaches for the 2005-06 fiscal year is
estimated at 21,180,000 25-pound container or container equivalents.
Thus, the $0.20 rate should provide $4,236,000 in assessment income.
Income derived from handler assessments, along with interest income,
research grants, and funds from the committee's reserves should be
adequate to cover budgeted expenses and maintain their desired reserve.
The major expenditures recommended by the PCC for the 2005-06 year
include $918,736 for administration, $1,260,160 for inspection,
$204,833 for research, and $2,711,980 for domestic and international
promotion. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2004-05 were $540,456,
$1,240,520, $208,570, and $3,188,457, respectively.
The PCC recommended an increase in the assessment rate to meet
anticipated 2005-06 expenses and preserve an acceptable financial
reserve. A reserve of approximately $420,000 is needed to fund expenses
for the following year until assessments for that year are received.
The PCC reviewed and recommended 2005-06 expenditures of $5,095,709 and
the increased assessment rate.
Considerations in Determining Expenses and Assessment Rates
Prior to arriving at these budgets, the committees considered
information and recommendations from various sources, including, but
not limited to: The Executive Committee, the Research Subcommittee, the
International Programs Subcommittee, the Grade and Size Subcommittee,
and the Domestic Promotion Subcommittee.
Each of the committees then reviewed the proposed expenses; the
total estimated assessable 25-pound containers or container
equivalents; and the estimated income from other sources, such as
interest income and research grants, prior to recommending a final
assessment rate. The NAC decided that an assessment rate of $0.20 per
25-pound container or container equivalent would allow it to meet its
2005-06 expenses and carry over an operating reserve of approximately
$342,000, which is in line with the committee's financial needs. The
PCC decided that an assessment rate of $0.20 per 25-pound container or
container equivalent would allow it to meet its 2003-04 expenses and
carry over an operating reserve of approximately $420,000, which is in
line with the committee's financial needs. The committees then
unanimously recommended these rates to USDA
A review of historical and preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming fiscal period indicates that the grower price for
nectarines and peaches for the 2005-06 season could range between $4.00
and $6.00 per 25-pound container or container equivalent. Therefore,
the estimated assessment revenue for the 2005-06 fiscal period as a
percentage of total grower revenue could range between 3.33 and 5.0
percent.
This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs
are offset by the benefits derived from the operation of the marketing
orders. In addition, the committees' meetings were widely publicized
throughout the California nectarine and peach industries and all
interested persons were invited to attend the meetings and participate
in the committees' deliberations on all issues. Like all committee
meetings, the April 28, 2004, meetings were public meetings and all
entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this
issue.
This rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed
to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and
public sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published n the Federal
Register on August 22, 2005 (70 FR 48900). Copies of the proposed rule
were also mailed or sent via facsimile to all nectarine and peach
handlers. Finally, the proposal was made available through the Internet
by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 10-day comment period
ending September 1, 2005, was provided for interested persons to
respond to the proposal. Two comments supporting the proposal were
received. Both cited reduced crop yields and the need to fund pre-
harvest expenses next year as justification for the assessment rate
increases. An additional response was received, but it was not relevant
to the proposed assessment increase.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation
[[Page 56111]]
submitted by the NAC and PCC and other available information, it is
hereby found that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined that good
cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until
30 days after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) The
2005-06 fiscal period began on March 1, 2005, and the marketing orders
require that the assessment rates for each fiscal period apply to all
nectarines and peaches handled during such fiscal period; (2) the
committees need to have sufficient funds to pay their expenses, which
are incurred on a continuous basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this
action, which was discussed by the committees at public meetings and
unanimously recommended by a mail vote, and is similar to other
assessment rate actions issued in past years. Also, a 10-day comment
period was provided for in the proposed rule and the comments received
have been considered in reaching a final decision on this matter.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 916
Marketing agreements, Nectarines, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 917
Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR parts 916 and 917 are
amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR parts 916 and 917 continue to read
as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
PART 916--NECTARINES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
2. Section 916.234 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 916.234 Assessment rate.
On and after March 1, 2005, an assessment rate of $0.20 per 25-
pound container or container equivalent of nectarines is established
for California nectarines.
PART 917--PEACHES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
3. Section 917.258 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 917.258 Assessment rate.
On and after March 1, 2005, an assessment rate of $0.20 per 25-
pound container or container equivalent of peaches is established for
California peaches.
Dated: September 20, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-19085 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P