Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments, 55834-55835 [05-19047]
Download as PDF
55834
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 184 / Friday, September 23, 2005 / Notices
Rate
A recalculated rate will go into effect
every May 1 based on the above formula
and updated financial and load data.
The UGPR will notify the Transmission
Customer annually of the recalculated
rate on or before April 1.
Rate Schedule UGP–NT1; October 1, 2005;
Supersedes 1998 Schedule
Upper Great Plains Region Integrated
System: Annual Transmission Revenue
Requirement for Network Integration
Transmission Service
Effective
The first day of the first full billing
period beginning on or after October 1,
The Transmission Customer shall
compensate the Upper Great Plains
Region (UGPR) each month for Network
Transmission Service under the
applicable Network Integration
Transmission Service Agreement and
annual revenue requirement outlined
below. The formula for the annual
revenue requirement used to calculate
the charges for this service under this
schedule was developed and may be
modified under applicable Federal laws,
regulations, and policies.
Formula Rate
(Transmission Customer’s Load-Ratio Share × Annual Revenue Requirment for IS Transmission Service)
12 months
Annual Revenue Requirement
A recalculated annual revenue
requirement will go into effect every
May 1 based on updated financial data.
The UGPR will notify the Transmission
Customer annually of the recalculated
annual revenue requirement on or
before April 1.
[FR Doc. 05–19039 Filed 9–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6667–7]
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and Section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7167. An explanation of the
ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published
in the Federal Register dated April 1,
2005 (70 FR 16815).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20050187, ERP No. D–SFW–
F64005–00, Upper Mississippi
National Wildlife and Fish Refuge
Comprehensive Conservation Plan
(CCP) Implementation, MN, WI, IL
and IA.
Summary: EPA has no objections to
the Preferred Alternative, and
recommends that the Final EIS address
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Applicable
The UGPR may modify the charges for
Network Integration Transmission
Service upon written notice to the
Transmission Customer. Any change to
the charges to the Transmission
Customer for Network Integration
Transmission Service shall be as set
forth in a revision to this rate schedule
promulgated developed under
applicable Federal laws, regulations,
and policies and made part of the
applicable Transmission Customer’s
Service Agreement. The UGPR shall
charge the Transmission Customer
under the revenue requirement then in
effect.
15:21 Sep 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
how the plan will be integrated with the
Upper Mississippi River Navigation
Ecosystem Sustainability Program.
Rating LO.
EIS No. 20050209, ERP No. D–NPS–
J65442–WY, Grand Teton National
Park Transportation Plan,
Implementation, Grand Teton
National Park, Teton County, WY.
Summart: EPA expressed concerns
about wetland mitigation and storm
water impacts. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20050259, ERP No. D–FHW–
C40166–NY, Southtowns Connector/
Buffalo Outer Harbor Project,
Improvements on the NYS Route 5
Corridor from Buffalo Skyway Bridge
to NYS Route 179, in the City of
Buffalo, City of Lackawanna and
Town of Hamburg, Erie County, NY.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns
about assessment of cumulative
impacts. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20050274, ERP No. D–AFS–
J61107–ND, NE McKenzie Allotment
Management Plan Revisions, Proposes
to Continue Livestock Grazing on 28
Allotments, Dakota Prairie Grasslands
Land and Resource Management Plan,
Dakota Prairie Grasslands, McKenzie
Ranger District, McKenzie County,
ND.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns
about potential water quality impacts
from sediment, fecal coliform and
temperature modification in streams
and other surface waters, and
recommended reducing water quality
impacts near aquatic/riparian resources
by working with permittees and other
stakeholders, and develop adaptive
management monitoring. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20050281, ERP No. D–AFS–
K65287–CA, North Fork Eel Grazing
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Allotment Management Project,
Proposing to Authorize Cattle Grazing
on Four Allotment, Six Rivers
National Forest, Mad River Ranger
District, North Fork Eel River and
Upper Mad River, Trinity County, CA.
Summary: EPA has no objection to the
proposed action. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20050306, ERP No. D–FHW–
H40185–00, U.S. Highway 34,
Plattsmouth Bridge Study, over the
Missouri River between U.S. 75 and I–
29, Funding, Coast Guard Permit, U.S.
Army COE 10 and 404 Permits, Cass
County, NE and Mills County, IA.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns
about potential wetland, floodplain,
stream, and cumulative impacts. Rating
EC2.
EIS No. 20050311, ERP No. D–NPS–
H65025–NE, Niobrara National Scenic
River General Management Plan,
Implementation, Brown, Cherry, Keya
Paha and Rock Counties, NE.
Summary: EPA has no objection to the
proposed action. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20050294, ERP No. DR–COE–
K11114–CA, Mare Island Reuse of
Dredged Material Disposal Ponds as a
Confirmed Updated Dredged Material
Disposal Facility, Issuing Section 404
Permit Clean Water Act and Section
10 Permit Rivers and Harbor Act, San
Francisco Bay Area, City of Vallejo,
Solando County, CA.
Summary: Many of EPA’s objections
to the original Draft EIS were addressed
in this revised document. However, EPA
continues to have concerns about the
delegation of responsibility for site
operations and associated
environmental safeguards, as well as
implementation of wetlands restoration
measures. Rating EC2.FINAL EISs.
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
EN23SE05.067
Monthly Charge =
2005, through September 30, 2010, or
until superseded by another rate
schedule.
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 184 / Friday, September 23, 2005 / Notices
EIS No. 20050283, ERP No. F–AFS–
K65269–NV, Martin Basin Rangeland
Project, Authorize Continued
Livestock Grazing in Eight
Allotments: Martin Basin, Indian,
West Side Flat Creek, Buffalo,
Bradshaw, Buttermilk, Granite Peak
and Rebel Creek Cattle and Horse
Allotments, Humboldt-Toiyabe
National Forest, Santa Rosa Ranger
District, Humboldt County, NV.
Summary: EPA has continuing
concerns due to further resource decline
and recommended an aggressive
implementation schedule to reduce
utilization rates in critical areas, and the
use of tiered environmental
documentation for specific Allotment
Management Plans.
EIS No. 20050286, ERP No. F–SFW–
B64004–ME, Maine Coastal Islands
National Wildlife Refuge (formerly
Petit Manan National Wildlife Refuge
Complex) Comprehensive
Conservation Plan, Implementation,
the Gulf of Maine.
Summary: EPA continues to have no
objection to the proposed action.
EIS No. 20050316, ERP No. F–FAA–
F51050–IL, O’Hare Modernization
Program, Proposes Major
Development, Chicago O’Hare
International Airport, Airport Layout
Plan (ALP), Federal Funding, U.S.
Army COE Section 404 Permit, City of
Chicago, IL.
Summary: While many EPA’s
previous concerns have been resolved,
EPA still has concerns because it is not
clear that proposed mitigation for noise,
air quality and water will be adopted
and included in the Record of Decision.
EIS No. 20050322, ERP No. F–FRC–
L03012–WA, Capacity Replacement
Project, Construction and Operation
of 79.5 miles Pipeline: Modify 5
Existing Compressor Stations, U.S.
Army COE 10 and 404 Permits,
Whatcom, Skagit, Snohomish, King,
Pierce and Thurston Counties, WA.
Summary: As requested, FERC
provided additional information on the
proposed compensatory mitigation plan
and other critical elements in the final
EIS. Accordingly, EPA had no
objections to the proposed action.
EIS No. 20050327, ERP No. F–AFS–
J65434–CO, County Line Vegetation
Management Project, Salvaging
Spruce Beetle Infected Trees and
Thinning Spruce-Fir Stand, Rio
Grande National Forest, Conejos Peak
Ranger District, Conejos County, CO.
Summary: EPA continues to have
concerns about soil erosion impacts,
stream water quality impacts, and
wildlife sensitive species impacts.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Sep 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
EIS No. 20050330, ERP No. F–AFS–
H65023–00, Black-Tailed Prairie Dog
Conservation and Management on the
Nebraska National Forest and
Associated Units, Implementation,
Dawes, Sioux Blaine, Cherry, Thomas
Counties, NE and Custer, Fall River,
Jackson, Pennington, Jones, Lyman,
Stanley Counties, SD.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20050331, ERP No. F–COE–
G39042–TX, PROGRAMMATIC—
Lower Colorado River Basin Study,
Provide Flood Damage Reduction and
Ecosystem Restoration, Colorado
River, TX.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20050337, ERP No. F–AFS–
K65283–CA, Empire Vegetation
Management Project, Reducing Fire
Hazards, Harvesting of Trees Using
Group-Selection (GS) and Individual
Trees Selection (ITS) Methods, Mt.
Hough Ranger District, Plumas
National Forest, Plumas County, CA.
Summary: While EPA has no
objection to the proposed action, EPA
did request that the ROD include a
commitment to mitigate impacts to air
quality and implement resource
monitoring/adaptive management.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 05–19047 Filed 9–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6667–6]
Environmental Impacts Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/. Weekly receipt of
Environmental Impact Statements, filed
09/12/2005, through 09/16/2005,
pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20050379, Final EIS, FHW, CA,
California High-Speed Train System,
High-Speed Train (HST) System for
Intercity Travel, Extend from
Sacramento and the San Francisco
Bay Area, in the North, through
Central Valley, to Los Angeles and
San Diego in the South , Orange
County, CA, Wait Period Ends: 10/24/
2005, Contact: David Valenstein 202–
493–6368 This document is available
on the Internet at: https://
www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55835
EIS No. 20050380, Final EIS, FHW, NC,
Fayetteville Outer Loop Corridor
Study, Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) Cape Fear River,
Cumberland, Hoke and Robeson
Counties, NC, Wait Period Ends: 10/
24/2005, Contact: John F. Sullivan
919–856–4346.
EIS No. 20050381, Final EIS, AFS, CA,
Los Padres National Forest Oil and
Gas Leasing Management,
Implementation, Kern, Los Angeles,
Monterey, Santa Barbara and San Luis
Obispo Counties, CA, Wait Period
Ends: 10/24/2005, Contact: Al Hess
805–646–4348 Ext. 311.
EIS No. 20050382, Draft EIS, BIA, WI,
Menominee Casino-Hotel 223-Acre
Fee-to-Trust Transfer and Casino
Project, Implementation, Federal
Trust, Menominee Indian Tribe of
Wisconsin (Tribe), in City of Kenosha
and County of Kenosha, WI, Comment
Period Ends: 11/21/2005, Contact:
Herb Nelson 612–725–4510.
EIS No. 20050383, Draft EIS, AFS, IL,
Shawnee National Forest Trails
Designation Project, Phase 1,
Designation, Construction and
Maintenance for Trail System within
Four Watershed: Eagle Creek, Big
Grand Pierre Creek, Lusk Creek and
Upper Bay Creek, Hidden Springs
Ranger District, Gallatin, Hardin,
Johnson, Pope and Saline Counties,
IL, Comment Period Ends: 11/07/
2005, Contact: Matthew Lechner 618–
253–7114. This document is available
on the Internet at: https://
www.fs.fed.us/r9/forests/shawnee/
projects/projects/eis/2005/trails/.
EIS No. 20050384, Final EIS, COE, DC,
Washington Aqueduct’s Project,
Proposed Water Treatment Residuals
Management Process, NPDES Permit,
Dalecarlia and McMillan Water
Treatment Plants, Potomac River,
Washington, DC, Wait Period Ends:
10/24/2005 Contact: Thomas P.
Jacobus 202–764–0031.
EIS No. 20050385, Draft EIS, COE, VA,
Craney Island Eastward Expansion,
Construction of a 580-acre Eastward
Expansion of the Existing Dredged
Material Management Area, Port of
Hampton Roads, Norfolk Harbor and
Channels, VA , Comment Period
Ends: 11/07/2005, Contact: Craig
Seltzer 757–201–7390.
EIS No. 20050386, Draft EIS, NOA, AK,
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management Approval of
Amendments to the State of Alaska’s
Coastal Management Program,
Implementation, Funding, AK,
Comment Period Ends: 11/07/2005,
Contact: Helen C.P. Bass 301–713–
3155 Ext. 175.
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 184 (Friday, September 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55834-55835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19047]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-6667-7]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at 202-564-7167. An explanation of the ratings
assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published
in the Federal Register dated April 1, 2005 (70 FR 16815).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20050187, ERP No. D-SFW-F64005-00, Upper Mississippi National
Wildlife and Fish Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP)
Implementation, MN, WI, IL and IA.
Summary: EPA has no objections to the Preferred Alternative, and
recommends that the Final EIS address how the plan will be integrated
with the Upper Mississippi River Navigation Ecosystem Sustainability
Program. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20050209, ERP No. D-NPS-J65442-WY, Grand Teton National Park
Transportation Plan, Implementation, Grand Teton National Park, Teton
County, WY.
Summart: EPA expressed concerns about wetland mitigation and storm
water impacts. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20050259, ERP No. D-FHW-C40166-NY, Southtowns Connector/Buffalo
Outer Harbor Project, Improvements on the NYS Route 5 Corridor from
Buffalo Skyway Bridge to NYS Route 179, in the City of Buffalo, City of
Lackawanna and Town of Hamburg, Erie County, NY.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns about assessment of cumulative
impacts. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20050274, ERP No. D-AFS-J61107-ND, NE McKenzie Allotment
Management Plan Revisions, Proposes to Continue Livestock Grazing on 28
Allotments, Dakota Prairie Grasslands Land and Resource Management
Plan, Dakota Prairie Grasslands, McKenzie Ranger District, McKenzie
County, ND.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns about potential water quality
impacts from sediment, fecal coliform and temperature modification in
streams and other surface waters, and recommended reducing water
quality impacts near aquatic/riparian resources by working with
permittees and other stakeholders, and develop adaptive management
monitoring. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20050281, ERP No. D-AFS-K65287-CA, North Fork Eel Grazing
Allotment Management Project, Proposing to Authorize Cattle Grazing on
Four Allotment, Six Rivers National Forest, Mad River Ranger District,
North Fork Eel River and Upper Mad River, Trinity County, CA.
Summary: EPA has no objection to the proposed action. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20050306, ERP No. D-FHW-H40185-00, U.S. Highway 34, Plattsmouth
Bridge Study, over the Missouri River between U.S. 75 and I-29,
Funding, Coast Guard Permit, U.S. Army COE 10 and 404 Permits, Cass
County, NE and Mills County, IA.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns about potential wetland,
floodplain, stream, and cumulative impacts. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20050311, ERP No. D-NPS-H65025-NE, Niobrara National Scenic
River General Management Plan, Implementation, Brown, Cherry, Keya Paha
and Rock Counties, NE.
Summary: EPA has no objection to the proposed action. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20050294, ERP No. DR-COE-K11114-CA, Mare Island Reuse of
Dredged Material Disposal Ponds as a Confirmed Updated Dredged Material
Disposal Facility, Issuing Section 404 Permit Clean Water Act and
Section 10 Permit Rivers and Harbor Act, San Francisco Bay Area, City
of Vallejo, Solando County, CA.
Summary: Many of EPA's objections to the original Draft EIS were
addressed in this revised document. However, EPA continues to have
concerns about the delegation of responsibility for site operations and
associated environmental safeguards, as well as implementation of
wetlands restoration measures. Rating EC2.FINAL EISs.
[[Page 55835]]
EIS No. 20050283, ERP No. F-AFS-K65269-NV, Martin Basin Rangeland
Project, Authorize Continued Livestock Grazing in Eight Allotments:
Martin Basin, Indian, West Side Flat Creek, Buffalo, Bradshaw,
Buttermilk, Granite Peak and Rebel Creek Cattle and Horse Allotments,
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Santa Rosa Ranger District, Humboldt
County, NV.
Summary: EPA has continuing concerns due to further resource
decline and recommended an aggressive implementation schedule to reduce
utilization rates in critical areas, and the use of tiered
environmental documentation for specific Allotment Management Plans.
EIS No. 20050286, ERP No. F-SFW-B64004-ME, Maine Coastal Islands
National Wildlife Refuge (formerly Petit Manan National Wildlife Refuge
Complex) Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Implementation, the Gulf of
Maine.
Summary: EPA continues to have no objection to the proposed action.
EIS No. 20050316, ERP No. F-FAA-F51050-IL, O'Hare Modernization
Program, Proposes Major Development, Chicago O'Hare International
Airport, Airport Layout Plan (ALP), Federal Funding, U.S. Army COE
Section 404 Permit, City of Chicago, IL.
Summary: While many EPA's previous concerns have been resolved, EPA
still has concerns because it is not clear that proposed mitigation for
noise, air quality and water will be adopted and included in the Record
of Decision.
EIS No. 20050322, ERP No. F-FRC-L03012-WA, Capacity Replacement
Project, Construction and Operation of 79.5 miles Pipeline: Modify 5
Existing Compressor Stations, U.S. Army COE 10 and 404 Permits,
Whatcom, Skagit, Snohomish, King, Pierce and Thurston Counties, WA.
Summary: As requested, FERC provided additional information on the
proposed compensatory mitigation plan and other critical elements in
the final EIS. Accordingly, EPA had no objections to the proposed
action.
EIS No. 20050327, ERP No. F-AFS-J65434-CO, County Line Vegetation
Management Project, Salvaging Spruce Beetle Infected Trees and Thinning
Spruce-Fir Stand, Rio Grande National Forest, Conejos Peak Ranger
District, Conejos County, CO.
Summary: EPA continues to have concerns about soil erosion impacts,
stream water quality impacts, and wildlife sensitive species impacts.
EIS No. 20050330, ERP No. F-AFS-H65023-00, Black-Tailed Prairie Dog
Conservation and Management on the Nebraska National Forest and
Associated Units, Implementation, Dawes, Sioux Blaine, Cherry, Thomas
Counties, NE and Custer, Fall River, Jackson, Pennington, Jones, Lyman,
Stanley Counties, SD.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20050331, ERP No. F-COE-G39042-TX, PROGRAMMATIC--Lower Colorado
River Basin Study, Provide Flood Damage Reduction and Ecosystem
Restoration, Colorado River, TX.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20050337, ERP No. F-AFS-K65283-CA, Empire Vegetation Management
Project, Reducing Fire Hazards, Harvesting of Trees Using Group-
Selection (GS) and Individual Trees Selection (ITS) Methods, Mt. Hough
Ranger District, Plumas National Forest, Plumas County, CA.
Summary: While EPA has no objection to the proposed action, EPA did
request that the ROD include a commitment to mitigate impacts to air
quality and implement resource monitoring/adaptive management.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 05-19047 Filed 9-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P