Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Trent River, NC, 55727-55728 [05-19006]

Agencies

• Coast Guard
• DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 184 (Friday, September 23, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55727-55728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19006]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD05-05-117]
RIN 1625-AA09


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Trent River, NC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is temporarily changing the regulations that 
govern the operation of the U.S. 70 Bridge across the Trent River, at 
mile 0.0, at New Bern, NC. This rule allows the bridge to remain in the 
closed-to-navigation position from 6 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., on October 1, 
2005, to facilitate the Neuse River Bridge Run.

DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on October 1, 
2005.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket, as part of docket CGD05-05-117 and are available for 
inspection or copying at Commander (obr), Fifth Coast Guard District, 
Federal Building, 1st Floor, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 
23704-5004 between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays. The telephone number is (757) 398-6629. Fifth 
District maintains the public docket for this rulemaking.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary S. Heyer, Bridge Management 
Specialist, Fifth Coast Guard District, at (757) 398-6629.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Good Cause for Not Publishing a NPRM

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this 
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) (B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing an NPRM is 
impracticable and contrary to the public interest as the Neuse River 
run is scheduled for October 1st, and immediate action is necessary to 
minimize the potential danger to the public. The bridge closure is a 
necessary measure to facilitate public safety that allows for the 
orderly movement of participants and vehicular traffic before, during 
and after the run.

Good Cause for Making Rule Effective in Less Than 30 Days

    Under 5 U.S.C. 533(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective in less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. A 30-day delayed effective date is 
impracticable and contrary to the public interest as the event is 
scheduled for October 1, 2005, and immediate action is necessary to 
ensure public safety and provide for the orderly movement of 
participants and vehicular traffic during the run.

Background and Purpose

    North Carolina Department of Transportation, who owns and operates 
the drawbridge, has requested a temporary deviation from the operating 
regulations to facilitate the Neuse River Bridge Run. The run is an 
annual event, attracting participants from the surrounding cities and 
states.
    The existing regulations are outlined at 33 CFR 117.843(a). The 
bridge has a vertical clearance of 13 feet at mean high water in the 
closed position, unlimited vertical clearance in the full open 
position. The Coast Guard has informed the known users of the waterway 
of the closure periods for the bridge so that these vessels can arrange 
their transits to minimize any impact during the Neuse River Bridge 
Run.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does 
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the 
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland 
Security. This conclusion is based fact that the Coast Guard has 
informed the known users of the waterway of this rule and that the 
mariners can plan their trips in accordance with scheduled closure 
period.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. This conclusion is based on the fact that the Coast Guard has 
informed the know users of the waterway, which consist mostly of 
recreational boaters and fisherman, of this rule and that the mariners 
can plan their trips in accordance with scheduled closure period.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247).

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

[[Page 55728]]

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do 
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions, and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. 
Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus 
standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, 
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit 
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the 
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under 
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e) of the Instruction, from further 
environmental documentation.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

Regulations

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR Part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499, Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); section 117.843, also 
issued under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.

0
2. From 6 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on October 1, 2005, in Sec.  117.843 
suspend paragraphs (a)(3), (a)(4) and add paragraph (a)(5) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  117.843  Trent River.

* * * * *
    (a)(5) From 6 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., on October 1, 2005, the U.S. 70 
Bridge, mile 0.0, at New Bern, NC, shall remain closed to navigation.
* * * * *

    Dated: September 13, 2005.
S.H. Ratti,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Fifth Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 05-19006 Filed 9-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P