Public Housing Graduation Incentive Bonus Program; Correction, 55916-55917 [05-18986]

Download as PDF 55916 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 184 / Friday, September 23, 2005 / Notices (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including using appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Information Collection Requirement Title: Department of Homeland Security—Vulnerability Identification Self-Assessment Tool—Transportation (DHS–VISAT–T). Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection. OMB Control Number: 1652–0037. Forms(s): NA. Affected Public: Various modal transportation sector owners and operators. Abstract: After its inception, TSA faced the challenge of securing all of the different modes within the transportation sector. A methodology was required in order to support interand intra-modal analysis and decisionmaking. Millions of assets exist within the transportation sector, ranging from over 500,000 highway-bridges to over 19,000 general aviation airports. Given this population of assets, it became apparent that a mechanism was needed to solicit data from the asset owners/ operators. TSA needs this data, such as the assets’ security measures currently deployed, along with a high-level assessment of system security effectiveness, in order to prioritize resources. In response to this need, TSA’s Office of Threat Assessment and Risk Management (OTRM) developed the Department of Homeland Security— Vulnerability Identification SelfAssessment Tool—Transportation (DHS–VISAT–T), formerly called the TSA Self-Assessment Risk Module (TSARM), as a means to gather securityrelated data and provide a cost-free service to the transportation sector. TSA designed this tool to be flexible to support the unique characteristics of each transportation mode, while still providing a common framework from which analysis and trends can be identified. DHS–VISAT–T represents the U.S. Government’s first selfassessment tool that provides the following features: • The tool is provided to users at no cost; • The tool is voluntary (potential users contact TSA to access the tool); • The tool is web-based, easily accessible; and VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:21 Sep 22, 2005 Jkt 205001 • All ratings are determined by the user. Upon completion of the tool assessment, users receive a report that summarizes their inputs. They may then use this report to develop a security plan or to identify areas of potential vulnerability. Users have the option to submit the completed assessment to DHS. If submitted, DHS reviews the assessment for consistency and provides feedback to the users. Owners and operators within the transportation sector can access information about the tool by visiting TSA’s Web site: www.tsa.gov, selecting ‘‘Industry Partners,’’ then ‘‘Risk Management,’’ then finally selecting the ‘‘DHS–VISAT’’ link. Thus far, TSA has developed modules of the tool for maritime, mass transit, highway bridges, and rail passenger stations, with more in development. TSA is seeking OMB approval to renew this control number for the maximum three-year period to continue to provide this tool to transportation owners and operators. Number of Respondents: Of the possible 3,002,450 respondents from the various transportation sectors, TSA expects that approximately 10 percent, or 300,245, will use the tool. Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An estimated 2,401,960 hours annually. Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on September 19, 2005. Lisa S. Dean, Privacy Officer. [FR Doc. 05–19089 Filed 9–22–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–62–P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR–4984–C–03] Public Housing Graduation Incentive Bonus Program; Correction Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, HUD. ACTION: Notice of funding availability; correction. AGENCY: SUMMARY: On June 2, 2005, HUD published its notice of funding availability (NOFA) for the Public Housing Graduation Incentive Bonus program. The NOFA includes a provision that disqualifies applicants that request funding in excess of the applicable maximum award. The Department has determined that this provision was erroneously included in this NOFA. This notice corrects this error by removing the provision from PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the NOFA. Except for the changes discussed here, and the other technical change published on July 29, 2005, the original NOFA published on June 2, 2005, is unchanged. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions and technical assistance, applicants may call the Public and Indian Housing Information and Resource Center at 800–955–2232. Hearing- or speech-impaired persons may call the Federal Relay Service at 800–877–8339. (These are toll-free numbers.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 2, 2005 (70 FR 32470), HUD published a NOFA for the Public Housing Graduation Incentive Bonus program. The purpose of the program is to invite Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) to apply for a graduation incentive bonus. The graduation incentive bonus is awarded to PHAs that can show their public housing residents are moving away from long-term dependence on housing assistance. This showing is evidenced by the proportion of households that leaves public housing and end their participation in assisted housing programs during calendar year 2004 plus the average length of stay among public housing residents. The NOFA announced the availability of up to $10 million under the Graduation Incentive Bonus program in fiscal year 2005. Eligible applicants are PHAs that operated a public housing program during calendar year 2004, have reported Public and Indian Housing Information Center (PIC) Family Household form HUD–50058 data for residents who ended their residency in public housing during calendar year 2004, have a minimum of 100 dwelling units in management status as reported in PIC as approved by the field office as of January 15, 2005, have a minimum of twenty-five Family Household form HUD–50058 records reported in PIC and have met the minimum threshold criteria based upon its size category. Following publication of the June 2, 2005, NOFA, HUD determined that paragraph III.C.2. (Excess Funding Requests) was erroneously included in the June 2, 2005, NOFA. That paragraph provides that ‘‘Applicants that request funding in excess of the maximum award that they are eligible to receive will not receive funding consideration.’’ This provision, adopted in error in the June 2, 2005, NOFA, is inappropriate as a basis for awarding the funds reserved in the NOFA. As discussed in the June 2, 2005, NOFA, the funding is predetermined and will be awarded based on PHA size and certain E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM 23SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 184 / Friday, September 23, 2005 / Notices identified historical data. Consequently, a PHA cannot receive an award in excess of the amount predetermined for its size. The formulaic nature of the allocation process makes it irrelevant that a PHA may inadvertently or otherwise apply for an amount larger than HUD decided to award. HUD will not exceed the respective award limits for the different sizes of PHAs. Accordingly, in the Public Housing Graduation Incentive Bonus Program, HUD will remove paragraph III.C.2. entitled Excess Funding Requests. Dated: September 15, 2005. Paula O. Blunt, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing. [FR Doc. 05–18986 Filed 9–22–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–33–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NW., Room 301 LS, Washington, DC 20240–9998, telephone (202) 452–7787. Gale A. Norton, Secretary of the Interior. [FR Doc. 05–19057 Filed 9–22–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–40–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. Nos. 731–TA–846–850 (Review)] Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe From the CZECH Republic, Japan, Mexico, Romania, and South Africa United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year reviews concerning the antidumping duty orders on carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from the Czech Republic, Japan, Mexico, Romania, and South Africa. AGENCY: [CA–668–1040–AA] Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Advisory Committee—Notice of Renewal Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of renewal. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92–463). Notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture have renewed the Bureau of Land Management’s Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Advisory Committee. The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretaries with respect to the preparation and implementation of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Management Plan. Certification Statement I hereby certify that the renewal of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Advisory Committee is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the Secretary of the Interior’s and the Secretary of Agriculture’s responsibilities to manage the lands, resources, and facilities administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maggie Langlas, National Landscape Conservation System (WO–170), Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C Street, VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:21 Sep 22, 2005 Jkt 205001 SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from the Czech Republic, Japan, Mexico, Romania, and South Africa would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). EFFECTIVE DATE: September 12, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher J. Cassise (202–708–5408), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 55917 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.—On August 18, 2005, the Commission determined that responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews were such that full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act should proceed (70 FR 49680, August 24, 2005). A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements are available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Participation in the reviews and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission’s rules, by 45 days after publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the reviews. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted access to BPI following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Staff report.—The prehearing staff report in the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on February 10, 2006, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the Commission’s rules. Hearing.—The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on March 2, 2006, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM 23SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 184 (Friday, September 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55916-55917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18986]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4984-C-03]


Public Housing Graduation Incentive Bonus Program; Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian 
Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Notice of funding availability; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 2, 2005, HUD published its notice of funding 
availability (NOFA) for the Public Housing Graduation Incentive Bonus 
program. The NOFA includes a provision that disqualifies applicants 
that request funding in excess of the applicable maximum award. The 
Department has determined that this provision was erroneously included 
in this NOFA. This notice corrects this error by removing the provision 
from the NOFA. Except for the changes discussed here, and the other 
technical change published on July 29, 2005, the original NOFA 
published on June 2, 2005, is unchanged.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions and technical 
assistance, applicants may call the Public and Indian Housing 
Information and Resource Center at 800-955-2232. Hearing- or speech-
impaired persons may call the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339. 
(These are toll-free numbers.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 2, 2005 (70 FR 32470), HUD published 
a NOFA for the Public Housing Graduation Incentive Bonus program. The 
purpose of the program is to invite Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) 
to apply for a graduation incentive bonus. The graduation incentive 
bonus is awarded to PHAs that can show their public housing residents 
are moving away from long-term dependence on housing assistance. This 
showing is evidenced by the proportion of households that leaves public 
housing and end their participation in assisted housing programs during 
calendar year 2004 plus the average length of stay among public housing 
residents.
    The NOFA announced the availability of up to $10 million under the 
Graduation Incentive Bonus program in fiscal year 2005. Eligible 
applicants are PHAs that operated a public housing program during 
calendar year 2004, have reported Public and Indian Housing Information 
Center (PIC) Family Household form HUD-50058 data for residents who 
ended their residency in public housing during calendar year 2004, have 
a minimum of 100 dwelling units in management status as reported in PIC 
as approved by the field office as of January 15, 2005, have a minimum 
of twenty-five Family Household form HUD-50058 records reported in PIC 
and have met the minimum threshold criteria based upon its size 
category.
    Following publication of the June 2, 2005, NOFA, HUD determined 
that paragraph III.C.2. (Excess Funding Requests) was erroneously 
included in the June 2, 2005, NOFA. That paragraph provides that 
``Applicants that request funding in excess of the maximum award that 
they are eligible to receive will not receive funding consideration.'' 
This provision, adopted in error in the June 2, 2005, NOFA, is 
inappropriate as a basis for awarding the funds reserved in the NOFA. 
As discussed in the June 2, 2005, NOFA, the funding is predetermined 
and will be awarded based on PHA size and certain

[[Page 55917]]

identified historical data. Consequently, a PHA cannot receive an award 
in excess of the amount predetermined for its size. The formulaic 
nature of the allocation process makes it irrelevant that a PHA may 
inadvertently or otherwise apply for an amount larger than HUD decided 
to award. HUD will not exceed the respective award limits for the 
different sizes of PHAs.
    Accordingly, in the Public Housing Graduation Incentive Bonus 
Program, HUD will remove paragraph III.C.2. entitled Excess Funding 
Requests.

    Dated: September 15, 2005.
Paula O. Blunt,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.
[FR Doc. 05-18986 Filed 9-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-33-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.