Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission for Extension Under Delegated Authority, 55392-55393 [05-18844]
Download as PDF
55392
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 21, 2005 / Notices
ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by
e-mail to opp-docket@epa.gov,
Attention: Docket ID number OPP–
2005–0241. In contrast to EPA Dockets,
EPA’s e-mail system is not an
‘‘anonymous access’’system. If you send
an e-mail comment directly to the
docket without going through EPA
Dockets, EPA’s e-mail system
automatically captures your e-mail
address. E-mail addresses that are
automatically captured by EPA’s e-mail
system are included as part of the
comment that is placed in the official
public docket, and made available in
EPA Dockets.
iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit
comments on a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to the mailing address
identified in Unit I.C.2. These electronic
submissions will be accepted in
WordPerfect or ASCII file format. Avoid
the use of special characters and any
form of encryption.
2. By mail. Send your comments to:
Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office
of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001, Attention:
Docket ID number OPP–2005–0241.
3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver
your comments to: Public Information
and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB),
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Room 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell
Street, Arlington, VA 22202–4501,
Attention: Docket ID number OPP–
2005–0241. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the docket’s normal
hours of operation as identified in Unit
I.B.1.
D. How Should I Submit CBI to the
Agency?
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI electronically
through EPA Dockets or by e-mail. You
may claim information that you submit
to EPA as CBI by marking any part or
all of that information as CBI (if you
submit CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark
the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically
within the disk or CD ROM the specific
information that is CBI). Information so
marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
In addition to one complete version of
the comment that includes any
information claimed as CBI, a copy of
the comment that does not contain the
information claimed as CBI must be
submitted for inclusion in the public
docket and EPA Dockets. If you submit
the copy that does not contain CBI on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:40 Sep 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the
disk or CD ROM clearly that it does not
contain CBI. Information not marked as
CBI will be included in the public
docket and EPA Dockets without prior
notice. If you have any questions about
CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI,
please consult the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
II. Background
What Action is the Agency Taking?
Under section 18 of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136p), at the
discretion of the Administrator, a
Federal or State agency may be
exempted from any provision of FIFRA
if the Administrator determines that
emergency conditions exist which
require the exemption. The Minnesota
and South Dakota Departments of
Agriculture have requested the
Administrator to issue a quarantine
exemption for the use of metconazole
(Caramba 90SL) and a metconazole +
pyraclostrobin co-pack (HeadlineCaramba co-pack) on soybeans to
control Asian soybean rust. Information
in accordance with 40 CFR part 166 was
submitted as part of this request.
As part of this request, the Applicant
asserts that most of the 73.8 million
soybean acres planted in the United
States could be compromised by Asian
soybean rust. A variety of published
reports have indicated that soybean rust
is capable of causing yield reductions
area-wide on soybeans from 10% to
50% and in selected fields greater than
90%. Due to the large acreage
potentially impacted, registrants have
informed the states that no single
product will be available in sufficient
quantity to treat the potential land area
impacted by Asian soybean rust.
Nationally, soybeans account for 73.8
million planted acres, 2.75 billion
bushels produced, and over 13 billion
value of production. Even a modest 4%
minimal loss of production could
reduce domestic soybean production to
its lowest point in the preceding 5 years.
According to the quarantine exemption
request, several products have emerged
as potentially efficacious against Asian
soybean rust in international trials,
including metconazole. Metconazole is
a systemic, triazole fungicide that can be
used as a systemic eradicant and a
protectant with post-infection activity
that can stop pathogen establishment in
the early phases of disease
development.
As part of this quarantine exemption
request, the Applicant proposes a
maximum of 2 applications of the 8.6%
metconazole formula (Caramba 90SL)
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
per season at an application rate of
0.96–1.14 ounces of active ingredient/
acre (8.2–9.6 fluid ounces of product per
acre) of soybeans treated. In addition,
the Applicant proposes the use of 1
application of the 32.2% (8.6%
metconazole + 23.6% pyraclostrobin)
metconazole + pyraclostrobin co-pack
(Headline-Caramba co-pack) per season
at an application rate of 1.89 ounces of
active ingredient (0.72 ounces of
metconazole + 1.17 ounces of
pyraclostrobin)/acre (9.64 fluid ounces
of product per acre) of soybeans treated.
Ground and aerial applications are
requested for both products. If granted,
the use of Caramba 90SL on soybeans
would result in approximately 0.05–
0.06 million pounds of active ingredient
used per 1 million soybean acres
treated. Further, the use of the
(Headline-Caramba co-pack) on
soybeans would result in approximately
0.10 million pounds of active
ingredients used per 1 million soybean
acres treated.
This notice does not constitute a
decision by EPA on the application
itself. The regulations governing section
18 of FIFRA require publication of a
notice of receipt of an application for a
quarantine exemption proposing ‘‘use of
a new chemical (i.e., an active
ingredient) which has not been
registered by EPA.’’ This notice
provides an opportunity for public
comment on the application.
The Agency, will review and consider
all comments received during the 15–
day public comment period in
determining whether to issue the
quarantine exemption requested by the
Minnesota and South Dakota
Departments of Agriculture.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides
and pests.
Dated: September 9, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 05–18350 Filed 9–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission
for Extension Under Delegated
Authority
September 15, 2005.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 21, 2005 / Notices
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law 104–13.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act that does not
display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before November 21,
2005. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your all
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
comments by email or U.S. postal mail.
To submit your comments by email
send them to PRA@fcc.gov. To submit
your comments by U.S. mail, mark them
to the attention of Cathy Williams,
Federal Communications Commission,
Room 1–C823, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information about the
information collection(s) send an email
to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Cathy
Williams at (202) 418–2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0423.
Title: Section 73.3588, Dismissal of
Petitions to Deny or Withdrawal of
Informal Objections.
Form Number: Not applicable.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities.
Number of Respondents: 50.
Estimated Time per Response: 20
minutes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:40 Sep 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement; third party
disclosure requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 17 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $42,500.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: 47 CFR 73.3588
requires a petitioner to obtain approval
from the FCC to dismiss or withdraw its
petition to deny when it is filed against
a renewal application and applications
for new construction permits,
modifications, transfers and
assignments. This request for approval
must contain a copy of any written
agreement, an affidavit stating that the
petitioner has not received any
consideration in excess of legitimate
and prudent expenses in exchange for
dismissing/withdrawing its petition and
an itemization of the expenses for which
it is seeking reimbursement. Each
remaining party to any written or oral
agreement must submit an affidavit
within five days of the petitioner’s
request for approval stating that it has
paid no consideration to the petitioner
in excess of the petitioner’s legitimate
and prudent expenses. The data is used
by FCC staff to ensure that a petition to
deny or informal objection is filed under
appropriate circumstances and not to
extract payments in excess of legitimate
and prudent expenses.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–18844 Filed 9–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–10–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Submitted for
Review to the Office of Management
and Budget
September 12, 2005.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law 104–13.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55393
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before October 21,
2005. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting PRA comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) comments to
Judith B. Herman, Federal
Communications Commission, Room 1–
C804, 445 12th Street, SW., DC 20554 or
via the Internet to JudithB.Herman@fcc.gov. If you would like to
obtain or view a copy of this new or
revised information collection, you may
do so by visiting the FCC PRA Web page
at: https://www.fcc.gov/omd/pra.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or copies of the
information collection(s), contact Judith
B. Herman at 202–418–0214 or via the
Internet at Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB
Control No.: 3060–0695.
Title: Section 87.219, Automatic
Operations.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Reinstatement
without change, of a previously
approved collection for which approval
has expired.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit.
Number of Respondents: 50.
Estimated Time Per Response: .7
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement, third party
disclosure requirement and
recordkeeping requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 35 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $6,000.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This rule section
requires that if airports have control
towers or Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) flight service
stations, and more than one licensee
wants to have an automated
aeronautical advisory station (unicom),
they must write an agreement outlining
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55392-55393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18844]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission for Extension Under Delegated
Authority
September 15, 2005.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden
[[Page 55393]]
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law 104-
13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of
information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act that does not
display a valid control number. Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including
whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy
of the Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before November 21, 2005. If you anticipate that you
will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the
period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact
listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your all Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
comments by email or U.S. postal mail. To submit your comments by email
send them to PRA@fcc.gov. To submit your comments by U.S. mail, mark
them to the attention of Cathy Williams, Federal Communications
Commission, Room 1-C823, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the
information collection(s) send an email to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Cathy
Williams at (202) 418-2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060-0423.
Title: Section 73.3588, Dismissal of Petitions to Deny or
Withdrawal of Informal Objections.
Form Number: Not applicable.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities.
Number of Respondents: 50.
Estimated Time per Response: 20 minutes.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement; third
party disclosure requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 17 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $42,500.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: 47 CFR 73.3588 requires a petitioner to obtain
approval from the FCC to dismiss or withdraw its petition to deny when
it is filed against a renewal application and applications for new
construction permits, modifications, transfers and assignments. This
request for approval must contain a copy of any written agreement, an
affidavit stating that the petitioner has not received any
consideration in excess of legitimate and prudent expenses in exchange
for dismissing/withdrawing its petition and an itemization of the
expenses for which it is seeking reimbursement. Each remaining party to
any written or oral agreement must submit an affidavit within five days
of the petitioner's request for approval stating that it has paid no
consideration to the petitioner in excess of the petitioner's
legitimate and prudent expenses. The data is used by FCC staff to
ensure that a petition to deny or informal objection is filed under
appropriate circumstances and not to extract payments in excess of
legitimate and prudent expenses.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-18844 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-10-P