National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Request for Public Comment, 54950-54951 [05-18602]
Download as PDF
54950
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 180 / Monday, September 19, 2005 / Notices
Contact Person: Lawrence Baizer, PhD,
Scientific Review Administrator, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4152,
MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
1257. baizerl@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel, Clinical
Neuroscience and Disease.
Date: October 17–18, 2005.
Time: 11 a.m. to 11 a.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase
Pavillion, 4300 Military Road, NW.,
Washington, DC 20015.
Contact Person: Seetha Bhagavan, PhD,
Scientific Review Administrator, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3022D,
MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
1121. bhagavas@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Genes, Genomes, and
Genetics Integrated Review Group,
Genomics, Computational Biology and
Technology Study Section.
Date: October 17–18, 2005.
Time: 5 p.m. to 5 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Holiday Inn Select, 480 King Street,
Alexandria, VA 22314.
Contact Person: Camilla E. Day, PhD,
Scientific Review Administrator, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5148,
MSC 7890, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
1037. dayc@csr.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;
93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844,
93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: September 12, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–18598 Filed 9–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Dental &
Craniofacial Research; Request for
Public Comment
Notice is hereby given that the Blue
Ribbon Panel (BRP) on the Future of the
National Institute of Dental and
Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
Intramural Program (IRP) is soliciting
input from interested parties.
This Panel was established by the
Institute as a follow-up to a similar
Panel established in 1992 in response to
a recommendation from the then
National Advisory Dental Research
Council (NADRC) to provide advice to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Sep 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
the Director, NIDCR. Subsequently, the
External Advisory Committee (EAC) on
the Intramural Research Program of the
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
recommended that individual reviews
of each intramural program be
conducted. In addition to addressing
issues unique to each Institute, panels
are asked to review the following transNIH issues:
• Innovation/impact of research
• Basic organization of the intramural
program (laboratory and branch
structure)
• Effectiveness of the Board of
Scientific Counselors (BSC) review
process
• Optimal balance between clinical
and lab-based research
• Funding balance between
intramural and extramural
• Quality of post-doctoral training
(Career development)
• Recruitment issues (Underrepresented individuals and missing
areas of expertise)
• Interactions with the Office of the
Director, other Institutes, central
services (Office of Research Services,
Clinical Center, Center for Information
Technology)—special problems or
opportunities
In response to the recommendation of
the EAC, the NIDCR has selected a Panel
composed of 10 members who are
expert in a variety of relevant
specialities within biomedical research.
The Panel will report its findings and
recommendations to the National
Advisory Dental and Craniofacial
Research Council for deliberation. To
assure input from the public and other
stakeholders, the Panel encourages
written public testimony to be
submitted no later than the close of
business on December 30, 2005. Written
input, limited to no more than 5 doublespaced pages using 12 point font and no
less than 11⁄2 inch margins, should be
restricted to the questions before the
Panel and should be addressed to Dr.
Norman S. Braveman, Assistant to the
Director, NIDCR, Building 31, Room
5B55, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda,
Maryland 20892. While e-mail
submissions are acceptable, they must
also be accompanied by signed hardcopy submissions which must arrive no
later than close of business on December
30, 2005.
Background
The NIDCR IRP, now in its 57th year,
is recognized as one of the premier
dental research institutions in the
world. Research conducted in the IRP is
unique insofar as it provides scientists
the opportunity to work on high-risk
innovative projects in a world class
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
multi-disciplinary environment. At the
same time, research conducted within
the IRP is not intended to mirror
research supported by the Institute in
the extramural community. Basic and
clinical research carried out in the IRP
forms the basis for new directions in
oral, dental and craniofacial sciences.
Specific information about the
organization of, and research conducted
by, the IRP can be found at https://
www.nidcr.nih.gov/Research/
Intramural/default.htm. It conducts
research in a wide range of basic and
clinical science and is currently
organized around seven units including:
Craniofacial and skeletal diseases
branch; craniofacial developmental
biology and regeneration branch; gene
therapy and therapeutics branch;
laboratory of oral sensory biology; oral
and pharyngeal cancer branch; oral
infection and immunity branch; pain
and neurosensory mechanisms branch.
Using the latest techniques in
biomedical science researchers
currently investigate the molecular
mechanisms of taste; the biochemistry,
structure, function and development of
bone, teeth, salivary glands and
connective tissues; interactions between
pathogens and oral tissues that cause
infectious and inflammatory diseases;
genetic disorders and tumors of the oral
cavity; the cause and treatment of acute
and chronic pain; and the development
of new and improved methods to
diagnose and treat oral disease.
Rationale for Establishing a Blue
Ribbon Panel
While the science conducted within
each laboratory of the NIDCR IRP is
assessed on a four-year cycle by the
Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC) it
has been approximately 12 years since
the overall structure and function of the
entire IRP has been examined. BSC
reviews are focused mainly on the
quality of science conducted during the
previous four-year period by a given
laboratory or branch and, as such,
insure that the Institute is supporting
only the most meritorious research.
These reviews, however, do not address
the overall direction of the IRP, since
they are focused on individual
laboratories or branches.
While the Institute has been able to
capitalize on the advice provided as the
result of the previous BRP, during the
past several years the face of science has
changed more rapidly than in any other
era. Advances in bioinformatics,
genomics, molecular and developmental
biology have provided us with tools to
ask new and important questions that
will inevitably lead to advances in
prevention, diagnosis and treatment of
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 180 / Monday, September 19, 2005 / Notices
oral, dental and craniofacial diseases. In
this context it is important for the
Institute to insure that the future
configuration of the IRP will maximize
progress toward the goals that have been
set for the IRP in the new era of
biomedical research.
Charge to the Panel
Since the Panel is charged with
assessing the future opportunities and
challenges for the IRP within broad
goals that have already been set, the
focus of the BRP will be to provide
recommendations for an efficient and
effective alignment of the IRP with
directions and opportunities and
resources available within the broader
framework of NIH intramural research
programs and the interest of the
Institute complementing, rather than
duplicating research already supported
through the extramural research
program of the Institute. To accomplish
this, the BRP will address challenges to
the IRP in the context of its mission, its
relationship with the overall mission of
the Institute, its position within the
larger NIH intramural environment, and
its relationship to the extramural
program supported by the NIDCR. The
Panel will be asked to provide advice
about how to best position the IRP,
using both current and to-be-developed
resources, in a way that will maximize
its contributions to current, emerging
and future research questions about
prevention, diagnosis and treatment of
dental, oral and craniofacial diseases.
• Balance between intramural and
extramural research programs including
funding levels and scientific topics
covered by each
• Quality of post-doctoral training
(career development) including
preparation for independent research
funded by government and nongovernment sources
• Recruitment issues (underrepresented individuals and missing
areas of expertise) including specific
areas to redress gaps
• Interactions with the Office of the
Director, other Institutes, central
services (Office of Research Services,
Clinical Center, Center for Information
Technology) including special problems
or opportunities that may affect the
mission and directions of the IRP
Members of the public interested in
providing their views to the Panel are
asked to restrict their comments to the
specific areas outlined above.
Further Information
For further information, please
contact: Dr. Norman S. Braveman,
Assistant to the Director, NIDCR,
Building 31, Room 5B55, 31 Center
Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892;
telephone (301) 594–2089; fax (301)
480–0964.
Dated: September 12, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–18602 Filed 9–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M
Questions to the Panel
The specific questions to be addressed
by the Panel and written public
comment are drawn from the list of
topics suggested by the EAC:
• Innovation/impact of research on
the broader field including the extent to
which research conducted in NIDCR IRP
laboratories influences research
conducted throughout the world
• Basic organization of the intramural
program (laboratory and branch
structure) including the optimal use of
resources and opportunities unique to
NIH-based scientists as well as the
extent to which the organization
facilitates partnerships and
collaborations within the IRP and with
other research entities (e.g., those
supported by NIDCR extramural
research grants, other NIH IRP
scientists, industry) conducting research
• Effectiveness of the BSC review
process in identifying world-class
innovative research and in providing
guidance for future research directions
• Optimal balance and connection
between clinical and lab-based research
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Sep 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Potential Privatization of the Journal
‘‘Environmental Health Perspectives;’’
Request for Comment
National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences
(NIEHS), National Institutes of Health
(NIH), Department of Health and Human
Services (DHHS).
ACTION: Request for Comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: For several decades, NIEHS
has published Environmental Health
Perspectives (EHP), a leading
biomedical publication in the field of
environmental health science, to
provide a forum for research in
environmental health science. EHP has
well fulfilled this purpose, but NIEHS is
now considering new channels to
inform scientists, clinicians, patients,
families, and the general public about
environmental health research findings.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54951
NIEHS is exploring web-based and other
methods to disseminate such
information and anticipates
development of a new system to
communicate important recent findings
in a timely and efficient manner.
NIEHS conducts ongoing review of all
its research, training, and
communications programs and has
recently determined that it is now
appropriate to consider phasing out
Institute sponsorship of this journal.
NIEHS has not reached a final decision
about potential privatization of EHP nor
has an implementation plan for carrying
out such a decision been developed.
Should such a decision be reached, it is
our goal to implement it in a manner
that will be least disruptive to the field
and to authors, reviewers, editorial
board, staff, and subscribers. The
current request for comment poses a
series of questions around core elements
that may comprise an implementation
plan for privatization of EHP. These
elements include: (1) Feasibility of
privatizing EHP, (2) a business plan for
continuation of the journal, (3) a
timeline and plan for transfer of
responsibility, (4) an editorial policy
plan, and (5) continued online access.
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 28, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
submitted at https://www.niehs.nih.gov/
external/ehp/home.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
EHPfeedback@niehs.nih.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background Information on EHP
EHP’s mission is to disseminate
credible environmental and
occupational health information around
the world. An overarching goal is to
raise global awareness of the
connectivity between the environment
and human health. EHP is read in nearly
every country of the world. EHP has an
impact factor of 3.93 and an Immediacy
Index of 1.20, ranking the journal
second of 132 environmental sciences
journals and fifth of 90 public,
environmental, and occupational health
journals. As a full open-access journal,
EHP provides XML-formatted content to
the digital archive Pubmed Central. EHP
also has partnerships with Medscape
and JSTOR.org (an organization that
maintains an archive of scholarly
journal) to facilitate access and
distribution of EHP’s content.
Electronic submission and review are
the norm for the 1,200 manuscripts that
EHP receives annually, and the rejection
rate is about 80%. EHP publishes all
articles within 24 hours of acceptance
on its Web site (https://
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54950-54951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18602]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Request for
Public Comment
Notice is hereby given that the Blue Ribbon Panel (BRP) on the
Future of the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
(NIDCR) Intramural Program (IRP) is soliciting input from interested
parties.
This Panel was established by the Institute as a follow-up to a
similar Panel established in 1992 in response to a recommendation from
the then National Advisory Dental Research Council (NADRC) to provide
advice to the Director, NIDCR. Subsequently, the External Advisory
Committee (EAC) on the Intramural Research Program of the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) recommended that individual reviews of each
intramural program be conducted. In addition to addressing issues
unique to each Institute, panels are asked to review the following
trans-NIH issues:
Innovation/impact of research
Basic organization of the intramural program (laboratory
and branch structure)
Effectiveness of the Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC)
review process
Optimal balance between clinical and lab-based research
Funding balance between intramural and extramural
Quality of post-doctoral training (Career development)
Recruitment issues (Under-represented individuals and
missing areas of expertise)
Interactions with the Office of the Director, other
Institutes, central services (Office of Research Services, Clinical
Center, Center for Information Technology)--special problems or
opportunities
In response to the recommendation of the EAC, the NIDCR has
selected a Panel composed of 10 members who are expert in a variety of
relevant specialities within biomedical research. The Panel will report
its findings and recommendations to the National Advisory Dental and
Craniofacial Research Council for deliberation. To assure input from
the public and other stakeholders, the Panel encourages written public
testimony to be submitted no later than the close of business on
December 30, 2005. Written input, limited to no more than 5 double-
spaced pages using 12 point font and no less than 1\1/2\ inch margins,
should be restricted to the questions before the Panel and should be
addressed to Dr. Norman S. Braveman, Assistant to the Director, NIDCR,
Building 31, Room 5B55, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
While e-mail submissions are acceptable, they must also be accompanied
by signed hard-copy submissions which must arrive no later than close
of business on December 30, 2005.
Background
The NIDCR IRP, now in its 57th year, is recognized as one of the
premier dental research institutions in the world. Research conducted
in the IRP is unique insofar as it provides scientists the opportunity
to work on high-risk innovative projects in a world class multi-
disciplinary environment. At the same time, research conducted within
the IRP is not intended to mirror research supported by the Institute
in the extramural community. Basic and clinical research carried out in
the IRP forms the basis for new directions in oral, dental and
craniofacial sciences. Specific information about the organization of,
and research conducted by, the IRP can be found at https://
www.nidcr.nih.gov/Research/Intramural/default.htm. It conducts research
in a wide range of basic and clinical science and is currently
organized around seven units including: Craniofacial and skeletal
diseases branch; craniofacial developmental biology and regeneration
branch; gene therapy and therapeutics branch; laboratory of oral
sensory biology; oral and pharyngeal cancer branch; oral infection and
immunity branch; pain and neurosensory mechanisms branch. Using the
latest techniques in biomedical science researchers currently
investigate the molecular mechanisms of taste; the biochemistry,
structure, function and development of bone, teeth, salivary glands and
connective tissues; interactions between pathogens and oral tissues
that cause infectious and inflammatory diseases; genetic disorders and
tumors of the oral cavity; the cause and treatment of acute and chronic
pain; and the development of new and improved methods to diagnose and
treat oral disease.
Rationale for Establishing a Blue Ribbon Panel
While the science conducted within each laboratory of the NIDCR IRP
is assessed on a four-year cycle by the Board of Scientific Counselors
(BSC) it has been approximately 12 years since the overall structure
and function of the entire IRP has been examined. BSC reviews are
focused mainly on the quality of science conducted during the previous
four-year period by a given laboratory or branch and, as such, insure
that the Institute is supporting only the most meritorious research.
These reviews, however, do not address the overall direction of the
IRP, since they are focused on individual laboratories or branches.
While the Institute has been able to capitalize on the advice
provided as the result of the previous BRP, during the past several
years the face of science has changed more rapidly than in any other
era. Advances in bioinformatics, genomics, molecular and developmental
biology have provided us with tools to ask new and important questions
that will inevitably lead to advances in prevention, diagnosis and
treatment of
[[Page 54951]]
oral, dental and craniofacial diseases. In this context it is important
for the Institute to insure that the future configuration of the IRP
will maximize progress toward the goals that have been set for the IRP
in the new era of biomedical research.
Charge to the Panel
Since the Panel is charged with assessing the future opportunities
and challenges for the IRP within broad goals that have already been
set, the focus of the BRP will be to provide recommendations for an
efficient and effective alignment of the IRP with directions and
opportunities and resources available within the broader framework of
NIH intramural research programs and the interest of the Institute
complementing, rather than duplicating research already supported
through the extramural research program of the Institute. To accomplish
this, the BRP will address challenges to the IRP in the context of its
mission, its relationship with the overall mission of the Institute,
its position within the larger NIH intramural environment, and its
relationship to the extramural program supported by the NIDCR. The
Panel will be asked to provide advice about how to best position the
IRP, using both current and to-be-developed resources, in a way that
will maximize its contributions to current, emerging and future
research questions about prevention, diagnosis and treatment of dental,
oral and craniofacial diseases.
Questions to the Panel
The specific questions to be addressed by the Panel and written
public comment are drawn from the list of topics suggested by the EAC:
Innovation/impact of research on the broader field
including the extent to which research conducted in NIDCR IRP
laboratories influences research conducted throughout the world
Basic organization of the intramural program (laboratory
and branch structure) including the optimal use of resources and
opportunities unique to NIH-based scientists as well as the extent to
which the organization facilitates partnerships and collaborations
within the IRP and with other research entities (e.g., those supported
by NIDCR extramural research grants, other NIH IRP scientists,
industry) conducting research
Effectiveness of the BSC review process in identifying
world-class innovative research and in providing guidance for future
research directions
Optimal balance and connection between clinical and lab-
based research
Balance between intramural and extramural research
programs including funding levels and scientific topics covered by each
Quality of post-doctoral training (career development)
including preparation for independent research funded by government and
non-government sources
Recruitment issues (under-represented individuals and
missing areas of expertise) including specific areas to redress gaps
Interactions with the Office of the Director, other
Institutes, central services (Office of Research Services, Clinical
Center, Center for Information Technology) including special problems
or opportunities that may affect the mission and directions of the IRP
Members of the public interested in providing their views to the
Panel are asked to restrict their comments to the specific areas
outlined above.
Further Information
For further information, please contact: Dr. Norman S. Braveman,
Assistant to the Director, NIDCR, Building 31, Room 5B55, 31 Center
Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; telephone (301) 594-2089; fax (301)
480-0964.
Dated: September 12, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-18602 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M