National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Request for Public Comment, 54950-54951 [05-18602]

Download as PDF 54950 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 180 / Monday, September 19, 2005 / Notices Contact Person: Lawrence Baizer, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4152, MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435– 1257. baizerl@csr.nih.gov. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Clinical Neuroscience and Disease. Date: October 17–18, 2005. Time: 11 a.m. to 11 a.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavillion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015. Contact Person: Seetha Bhagavan, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3022D, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435– 1121. bhagavas@csr.nih.gov. Name of Committee: Genes, Genomes, and Genetics Integrated Review Group, Genomics, Computational Biology and Technology Study Section. Date: October 17–18, 2005. Time: 5 p.m. to 5 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: Holiday Inn Select, 480 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22314. Contact Person: Camilla E. Day, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5148, MSC 7890, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435– 1037. dayc@csr.nih.gov. (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844, 93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS) Dated: September 12, 2005. Anthony M. Coelho, Jr., Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. [FR Doc. 05–18598 Filed 9–16–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–M DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Request for Public Comment Notice is hereby given that the Blue Ribbon Panel (BRP) on the Future of the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) Intramural Program (IRP) is soliciting input from interested parties. This Panel was established by the Institute as a follow-up to a similar Panel established in 1992 in response to a recommendation from the then National Advisory Dental Research Council (NADRC) to provide advice to VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:48 Sep 16, 2005 Jkt 205001 the Director, NIDCR. Subsequently, the External Advisory Committee (EAC) on the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommended that individual reviews of each intramural program be conducted. In addition to addressing issues unique to each Institute, panels are asked to review the following transNIH issues: • Innovation/impact of research • Basic organization of the intramural program (laboratory and branch structure) • Effectiveness of the Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC) review process • Optimal balance between clinical and lab-based research • Funding balance between intramural and extramural • Quality of post-doctoral training (Career development) • Recruitment issues (Underrepresented individuals and missing areas of expertise) • Interactions with the Office of the Director, other Institutes, central services (Office of Research Services, Clinical Center, Center for Information Technology)—special problems or opportunities In response to the recommendation of the EAC, the NIDCR has selected a Panel composed of 10 members who are expert in a variety of relevant specialities within biomedical research. The Panel will report its findings and recommendations to the National Advisory Dental and Craniofacial Research Council for deliberation. To assure input from the public and other stakeholders, the Panel encourages written public testimony to be submitted no later than the close of business on December 30, 2005. Written input, limited to no more than 5 doublespaced pages using 12 point font and no less than 11⁄2 inch margins, should be restricted to the questions before the Panel and should be addressed to Dr. Norman S. Braveman, Assistant to the Director, NIDCR, Building 31, Room 5B55, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. While e-mail submissions are acceptable, they must also be accompanied by signed hardcopy submissions which must arrive no later than close of business on December 30, 2005. Background The NIDCR IRP, now in its 57th year, is recognized as one of the premier dental research institutions in the world. Research conducted in the IRP is unique insofar as it provides scientists the opportunity to work on high-risk innovative projects in a world class PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 multi-disciplinary environment. At the same time, research conducted within the IRP is not intended to mirror research supported by the Institute in the extramural community. Basic and clinical research carried out in the IRP forms the basis for new directions in oral, dental and craniofacial sciences. Specific information about the organization of, and research conducted by, the IRP can be found at https:// www.nidcr.nih.gov/Research/ Intramural/default.htm. It conducts research in a wide range of basic and clinical science and is currently organized around seven units including: Craniofacial and skeletal diseases branch; craniofacial developmental biology and regeneration branch; gene therapy and therapeutics branch; laboratory of oral sensory biology; oral and pharyngeal cancer branch; oral infection and immunity branch; pain and neurosensory mechanisms branch. Using the latest techniques in biomedical science researchers currently investigate the molecular mechanisms of taste; the biochemistry, structure, function and development of bone, teeth, salivary glands and connective tissues; interactions between pathogens and oral tissues that cause infectious and inflammatory diseases; genetic disorders and tumors of the oral cavity; the cause and treatment of acute and chronic pain; and the development of new and improved methods to diagnose and treat oral disease. Rationale for Establishing a Blue Ribbon Panel While the science conducted within each laboratory of the NIDCR IRP is assessed on a four-year cycle by the Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC) it has been approximately 12 years since the overall structure and function of the entire IRP has been examined. BSC reviews are focused mainly on the quality of science conducted during the previous four-year period by a given laboratory or branch and, as such, insure that the Institute is supporting only the most meritorious research. These reviews, however, do not address the overall direction of the IRP, since they are focused on individual laboratories or branches. While the Institute has been able to capitalize on the advice provided as the result of the previous BRP, during the past several years the face of science has changed more rapidly than in any other era. Advances in bioinformatics, genomics, molecular and developmental biology have provided us with tools to ask new and important questions that will inevitably lead to advances in prevention, diagnosis and treatment of E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM 19SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 180 / Monday, September 19, 2005 / Notices oral, dental and craniofacial diseases. In this context it is important for the Institute to insure that the future configuration of the IRP will maximize progress toward the goals that have been set for the IRP in the new era of biomedical research. Charge to the Panel Since the Panel is charged with assessing the future opportunities and challenges for the IRP within broad goals that have already been set, the focus of the BRP will be to provide recommendations for an efficient and effective alignment of the IRP with directions and opportunities and resources available within the broader framework of NIH intramural research programs and the interest of the Institute complementing, rather than duplicating research already supported through the extramural research program of the Institute. To accomplish this, the BRP will address challenges to the IRP in the context of its mission, its relationship with the overall mission of the Institute, its position within the larger NIH intramural environment, and its relationship to the extramural program supported by the NIDCR. The Panel will be asked to provide advice about how to best position the IRP, using both current and to-be-developed resources, in a way that will maximize its contributions to current, emerging and future research questions about prevention, diagnosis and treatment of dental, oral and craniofacial diseases. • Balance between intramural and extramural research programs including funding levels and scientific topics covered by each • Quality of post-doctoral training (career development) including preparation for independent research funded by government and nongovernment sources • Recruitment issues (underrepresented individuals and missing areas of expertise) including specific areas to redress gaps • Interactions with the Office of the Director, other Institutes, central services (Office of Research Services, Clinical Center, Center for Information Technology) including special problems or opportunities that may affect the mission and directions of the IRP Members of the public interested in providing their views to the Panel are asked to restrict their comments to the specific areas outlined above. Further Information For further information, please contact: Dr. Norman S. Braveman, Assistant to the Director, NIDCR, Building 31, Room 5B55, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; telephone (301) 594–2089; fax (301) 480–0964. Dated: September 12, 2005. Anthony M. Coelho, Jr., Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. [FR Doc. 05–18602 Filed 9–16–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–M Questions to the Panel The specific questions to be addressed by the Panel and written public comment are drawn from the list of topics suggested by the EAC: • Innovation/impact of research on the broader field including the extent to which research conducted in NIDCR IRP laboratories influences research conducted throughout the world • Basic organization of the intramural program (laboratory and branch structure) including the optimal use of resources and opportunities unique to NIH-based scientists as well as the extent to which the organization facilitates partnerships and collaborations within the IRP and with other research entities (e.g., those supported by NIDCR extramural research grants, other NIH IRP scientists, industry) conducting research • Effectiveness of the BSC review process in identifying world-class innovative research and in providing guidance for future research directions • Optimal balance and connection between clinical and lab-based research VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:48 Sep 16, 2005 Jkt 205001 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Potential Privatization of the Journal ‘‘Environmental Health Perspectives;’’ Request for Comment National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). ACTION: Request for Comment. AGENCY: SUMMARY: For several decades, NIEHS has published Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP), a leading biomedical publication in the field of environmental health science, to provide a forum for research in environmental health science. EHP has well fulfilled this purpose, but NIEHS is now considering new channels to inform scientists, clinicians, patients, families, and the general public about environmental health research findings. PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 54951 NIEHS is exploring web-based and other methods to disseminate such information and anticipates development of a new system to communicate important recent findings in a timely and efficient manner. NIEHS conducts ongoing review of all its research, training, and communications programs and has recently determined that it is now appropriate to consider phasing out Institute sponsorship of this journal. NIEHS has not reached a final decision about potential privatization of EHP nor has an implementation plan for carrying out such a decision been developed. Should such a decision be reached, it is our goal to implement it in a manner that will be least disruptive to the field and to authors, reviewers, editorial board, staff, and subscribers. The current request for comment poses a series of questions around core elements that may comprise an implementation plan for privatization of EHP. These elements include: (1) Feasibility of privatizing EHP, (2) a business plan for continuation of the journal, (3) a timeline and plan for transfer of responsibility, (4) an editorial policy plan, and (5) continued online access. DATES: Comments must be received by October 28, 2005. ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted at https://www.niehs.nih.gov/ external/ehp/home.htm. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: EHPfeedback@niehs.nih.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Information on EHP EHP’s mission is to disseminate credible environmental and occupational health information around the world. An overarching goal is to raise global awareness of the connectivity between the environment and human health. EHP is read in nearly every country of the world. EHP has an impact factor of 3.93 and an Immediacy Index of 1.20, ranking the journal second of 132 environmental sciences journals and fifth of 90 public, environmental, and occupational health journals. As a full open-access journal, EHP provides XML-formatted content to the digital archive Pubmed Central. EHP also has partnerships with Medscape and JSTOR.org (an organization that maintains an archive of scholarly journal) to facilitate access and distribution of EHP’s content. Electronic submission and review are the norm for the 1,200 manuscripts that EHP receives annually, and the rejection rate is about 80%. EHP publishes all articles within 24 hours of acceptance on its Web site (https:// E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM 19SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54950-54951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Request for 
Public Comment

    Notice is hereby given that the Blue Ribbon Panel (BRP) on the 
Future of the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research 
(NIDCR) Intramural Program (IRP) is soliciting input from interested 
parties.
    This Panel was established by the Institute as a follow-up to a 
similar Panel established in 1992 in response to a recommendation from 
the then National Advisory Dental Research Council (NADRC) to provide 
advice to the Director, NIDCR. Subsequently, the External Advisory 
Committee (EAC) on the Intramural Research Program of the National 
Institutes of Health (NIH) recommended that individual reviews of each 
intramural program be conducted. In addition to addressing issues 
unique to each Institute, panels are asked to review the following 
trans-NIH issues:
     Innovation/impact of research
     Basic organization of the intramural program (laboratory 
and branch structure)
     Effectiveness of the Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC) 
review process
     Optimal balance between clinical and lab-based research
     Funding balance between intramural and extramural
     Quality of post-doctoral training (Career development)
     Recruitment issues (Under-represented individuals and 
missing areas of expertise)
     Interactions with the Office of the Director, other 
Institutes, central services (Office of Research Services, Clinical 
Center, Center for Information Technology)--special problems or 
opportunities
    In response to the recommendation of the EAC, the NIDCR has 
selected a Panel composed of 10 members who are expert in a variety of 
relevant specialities within biomedical research. The Panel will report 
its findings and recommendations to the National Advisory Dental and 
Craniofacial Research Council for deliberation. To assure input from 
the public and other stakeholders, the Panel encourages written public 
testimony to be submitted no later than the close of business on 
December 30, 2005. Written input, limited to no more than 5 double-
spaced pages using 12 point font and no less than 1\1/2\ inch margins, 
should be restricted to the questions before the Panel and should be 
addressed to Dr. Norman S. Braveman, Assistant to the Director, NIDCR, 
Building 31, Room 5B55, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. 
While e-mail submissions are acceptable, they must also be accompanied 
by signed hard-copy submissions which must arrive no later than close 
of business on December 30, 2005.

Background

    The NIDCR IRP, now in its 57th year, is recognized as one of the 
premier dental research institutions in the world. Research conducted 
in the IRP is unique insofar as it provides scientists the opportunity 
to work on high-risk innovative projects in a world class multi-
disciplinary environment. At the same time, research conducted within 
the IRP is not intended to mirror research supported by the Institute 
in the extramural community. Basic and clinical research carried out in 
the IRP forms the basis for new directions in oral, dental and 
craniofacial sciences. Specific information about the organization of, 
and research conducted by, the IRP can be found at https://
www.nidcr.nih.gov/Research/Intramural/default.htm. It conducts research 
in a wide range of basic and clinical science and is currently 
organized around seven units including: Craniofacial and skeletal 
diseases branch; craniofacial developmental biology and regeneration 
branch; gene therapy and therapeutics branch; laboratory of oral 
sensory biology; oral and pharyngeal cancer branch; oral infection and 
immunity branch; pain and neurosensory mechanisms branch. Using the 
latest techniques in biomedical science researchers currently 
investigate the molecular mechanisms of taste; the biochemistry, 
structure, function and development of bone, teeth, salivary glands and 
connective tissues; interactions between pathogens and oral tissues 
that cause infectious and inflammatory diseases; genetic disorders and 
tumors of the oral cavity; the cause and treatment of acute and chronic 
pain; and the development of new and improved methods to diagnose and 
treat oral disease.

Rationale for Establishing a Blue Ribbon Panel

    While the science conducted within each laboratory of the NIDCR IRP 
is assessed on a four-year cycle by the Board of Scientific Counselors 
(BSC) it has been approximately 12 years since the overall structure 
and function of the entire IRP has been examined. BSC reviews are 
focused mainly on the quality of science conducted during the previous 
four-year period by a given laboratory or branch and, as such, insure 
that the Institute is supporting only the most meritorious research. 
These reviews, however, do not address the overall direction of the 
IRP, since they are focused on individual laboratories or branches.
    While the Institute has been able to capitalize on the advice 
provided as the result of the previous BRP, during the past several 
years the face of science has changed more rapidly than in any other 
era. Advances in bioinformatics, genomics, molecular and developmental 
biology have provided us with tools to ask new and important questions 
that will inevitably lead to advances in prevention, diagnosis and 
treatment of

[[Page 54951]]

oral, dental and craniofacial diseases. In this context it is important 
for the Institute to insure that the future configuration of the IRP 
will maximize progress toward the goals that have been set for the IRP 
in the new era of biomedical research.

Charge to the Panel

    Since the Panel is charged with assessing the future opportunities 
and challenges for the IRP within broad goals that have already been 
set, the focus of the BRP will be to provide recommendations for an 
efficient and effective alignment of the IRP with directions and 
opportunities and resources available within the broader framework of 
NIH intramural research programs and the interest of the Institute 
complementing, rather than duplicating research already supported 
through the extramural research program of the Institute. To accomplish 
this, the BRP will address challenges to the IRP in the context of its 
mission, its relationship with the overall mission of the Institute, 
its position within the larger NIH intramural environment, and its 
relationship to the extramural program supported by the NIDCR. The 
Panel will be asked to provide advice about how to best position the 
IRP, using both current and to-be-developed resources, in a way that 
will maximize its contributions to current, emerging and future 
research questions about prevention, diagnosis and treatment of dental, 
oral and craniofacial diseases.

Questions to the Panel

    The specific questions to be addressed by the Panel and written 
public comment are drawn from the list of topics suggested by the EAC:
     Innovation/impact of research on the broader field 
including the extent to which research conducted in NIDCR IRP 
laboratories influences research conducted throughout the world
     Basic organization of the intramural program (laboratory 
and branch structure) including the optimal use of resources and 
opportunities unique to NIH-based scientists as well as the extent to 
which the organization facilitates partnerships and collaborations 
within the IRP and with other research entities (e.g., those supported 
by NIDCR extramural research grants, other NIH IRP scientists, 
industry) conducting research
     Effectiveness of the BSC review process in identifying 
world-class innovative research and in providing guidance for future 
research directions
     Optimal balance and connection between clinical and lab-
based research
     Balance between intramural and extramural research 
programs including funding levels and scientific topics covered by each
     Quality of post-doctoral training (career development) 
including preparation for independent research funded by government and 
non-government sources
     Recruitment issues (under-represented individuals and 
missing areas of expertise) including specific areas to redress gaps
     Interactions with the Office of the Director, other 
Institutes, central services (Office of Research Services, Clinical 
Center, Center for Information Technology) including special problems 
or opportunities that may affect the mission and directions of the IRP
    Members of the public interested in providing their views to the 
Panel are asked to restrict their comments to the specific areas 
outlined above.

Further Information

    For further information, please contact: Dr. Norman S. Braveman, 
Assistant to the Director, NIDCR, Building 31, Room 5B55, 31 Center 
Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; telephone (301) 594-2089; fax (301) 
480-0964.

    Dated: September 12, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-18602 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.