National Organic Program (NOP): Proposed Amendments to the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances (Crops and Processing), 54660-54668 [05-18381]
Download as PDF
54660
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Employee survey questions
Employee response choices
(10) Physical conditions (for example, noise level, temperature, lighting,
cleanliness in the workplace) allow employees to perform their jobs
well.
Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly
Disagree, or Do Not Know.
Performance Culture
(11) Promotions in my work unit are based on merit ..............................
(12) In my work unit, steps are taken to deal with a poor performer who
cannot or will not improve.
(13) Creativity and innovation are rewarded ............................................
(14) In my work unit, differences in performance are recognized in a
meaningful way.
(15) My performance appraisal is a fair reflection of my performance
(16) Discussions with my supervisor/team leader about my performance are worthwhile.
(17) Managers/supervisors/team leaders work well with employees of
different backgrounds.
Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither
Disagree, or Do Not Know.
Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither
Disagree, or Do Not Know.
Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither
Disagree, or Do Not Know.
Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither
Disagree, or Do Not Know.
Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither
Disagree, or Do Not Know.
Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither
Disagree, or Do Not Know.
Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither
Disagree, or Do Not Know.
Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly
Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly
Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly
Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly
Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly
Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly
Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly
Leadership
(18) I have a high level of respect for my organization’s senior leaders
(19) In my organization, leaders generate high levels of motivation and
commitment in the workforce.
(20) Managers review and evaluate the organization’s progress toward
meeting its goals and objectives.
(21) Employees are protected from health and safety hazards on the
job.
(22) My organization has prepared employees for potential safety and
security threats.
Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither
Disagree, or Do Not Know.
Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither
Disagree, or Do Not Know.
Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither
Disagree, or Do Not Know.
Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither
Disagree, or Do Not Know.
Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither
Disagree, or Do Not Know.
Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly
Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly
Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly
Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly
Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly
Job Satisfaction
(23) How satisfied are you with your involvement in decisions that affect your work?
(24) How satisfied are you with the recognition you receive for doing a
good job?
(25) How satisfied are you with the policies and practices of your senior leaders?
(26) How satisfied are you with the training you receive for your
present job?
(27) Considering everything, how satisfied are you with your job?
(28) Considering everything, how satisfied are you with your pay?
§ 250.302
Availability of results.
(a) Each agency will make the results
of its annual survey available to the
public and post the results on its Web
site, unless the agency head determines
that doing so would jeopardize or
negatively impact national security. The
posted survey results will include the
following:
(1) The agency’s evaluation of its
survey results;
(2) How the survey was conducted;
(3) Description of the employee
sample, unless all employees are
surveyed;
(4) The survey questions and response
choices with the prescribed questions
identified;
(5) The number of employees
surveyed and number of survey
respondents; and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:38 Sep 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
Very Satisfied, Satisfied,
or Very Dissatisfied.
Very Satisfied, Satisfied,
or Very Dissatisfied.
Very Satisfied, Satisfied,
or Very Dissatisfied.
Very Satisfied, Satisfied,
or Very Dissatisfied.
Very Satisfied, Satisfied,
or Very Dissatisfied.
Very Satisfied, Satisfied,
or Very Dissatisfied.
(6) The number of respondents for
each survey question and each response
choice.
(b) Data must be collected by
December 31 of each calendar year.
Each agency must post the beginning
and ending dates of its employees
survey and either the survey results
described in paragraph (a) or a
statement noting the decision not to
post no later than 120 days after the
agency completes survey
administration. OPM may extend this
date in unusual circumstances.
(c) Each agency must submit its
survey results to OPM no later than 120
days after the agency completes survey
administration.
[FR Doc. 05–18374 Filed 9–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–M
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied,
Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied,
Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied,
Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied,
Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied,
Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied,
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 205
[Docket Number TM–04–01]
RIN 0581–AC35
National Organic Program (NOP):
Proposed Amendments to the National
List of Allowed and Prohibited
Substances (Crops and Processing)
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
amend the U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s (USDA) National List of
Allowed and Prohibited Substances
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(National List) regulations to reflect
recommendations submitted to the
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) by
the National Organic Standards Board
(NOSB) from November 15, 2000,
through March 3, 2005. Consistent with
the recommendations from the NOSB,
this proposed rule would add fifteen
substances, along with any restrictive
annotations, to the National List. This
proposed rule would also amend the
mailing address for where to file a
Certification or Accreditation appeal.
DATES: Comments must be received by
November 15, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons may
comment on this proposed rule using
the following procedures:
• Mail: Comments may be submitted
by mail to: Arthur Neal, Director of
Program Administration, National
Organic Program, USDA–AMS–TMP–
NOP, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Room 4008–So., Ag Stop 0268,
Washington, DC 20250.
• E-mail: Comments may be
submitted via the Internet to:
National.List@usda.gov.
• Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Fax: Comments may be submitted
by fax to: (202) 205–7808.
• Written comments on this proposed
rule should be identified with the
docket number TMD–04–01.
Commenters should identify the topic
and section number of this proposed
rule to which the comment refers.
• Clearly indicate if you are for or
against the proposed rule or some
portion of it and your reason for it.
Include recommended language changes
as appropriate.
• Include a copy of articles or other
references that support your comments.
Only relevant material should be
submitted.
It is our intention to have all
comments to this proposed rule,
whether submitted by mail, e-mail, or
fax, available for viewing on the NOP
homepage. Comments submitted in
response to this proposed rule will be
available for viewing in person at
USDA–AMS, Transportation and
Marketing, Room 4008-South Building,
1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC, from 9 a.m. to 12 noon
and from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday (except official Federal
holidays). Persons wanting to visit the
USDA South Building to view
comments received in response to this
proposed rule are requested to make an
appointment in advance by calling (202)
720–3252.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arthur Neal, Director of Program
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:38 Sep 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
Administration, Telephone: (202) 720–
3252; Fax: (202) 205–7808.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On December 21, 2000, the Secretary
established, within the NOP [7 CFR part
205], the National List regulations
(§§ 205.600 through 205.607). The
National List regulations identify
synthetic substances and ingredients
that are allowed and nonsynthetic
(natural) substances and ingredients that
are prohibited for use in organic
production and handling. Under the
authority of the Organic Foods
Production Act of 1990 (OFPA), as
amended, (7 U.S.C. 6501 et seq.), the
National List can be amended by the
Secretary based on proposed
amendments developed by the NOSB.
Since established, the National List has
been amended twice, October 31, 2003
(68 FR 61987), and November 3, 2003
(68 FR 62215).
This proposed rule would amend the
National List to reflect
recommendations submitted to the
Secretary by the NOSB from November
15, 2000, through March 3, 2005.
Between the specified time period, the
NOSB has recommended that the
Secretary add four substances to
§ 205.601 and eleven substances to
§ 205.605 of the National List
regulations. This proposed rule would
also amend the mailing address for
where to file a Certification or
Accreditation appeal pursuant to
§ 205.681(d).
II. Overview of Proposed Amendments
The following provides an overview
of the proposed amendments to
designated sections of the National List
regulations:
Section 205.601 Synthetic Substances
Allowed for Use in Organic Crop
Production
This proposed rule would amend
paragraph (m)(2) of § 205.601 of the
regulations by adding the following
substances:
Glycerine oleate (Glycerol
monooleate) (CAS #s 25496–72–4; 111–
03–5; 37220–82–9)—for use only until
December 31, 2006. Glycerine oleate
was petitioned to be used as an antifoaming agent (defoamer) in organic
crop production. Glycerine oleate is a
clear amber or pale yellow liquid that is
insoluble in water, slightly soluble in
cold alcohol, and soluble in hot alcohol,
chloroform, ether, and petroleum ether.
In crop production, Glycerin oleate
would be used as an anti-foaming agent
(defoamer) in micronized wettable
Sulfur that is used to control scab and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54661
mildew in the production of apples,
pears, grapes, and raisins. The function
of Glycerine oleate in the micronized
wettable Sulfur would be to enable the
product to be mixed in a tank effectively
and sprayed on crops evenly.
Under the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has classified Glycerine
oleate as a List 3 inert (Inerts of
Unknown Toxicity). Under the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA),
Glycerin monooleate (a synonym for
Glycerin oleate) has been classified as a
substance that is Generally Recognized
As Safe (GRAS) for food production (21
CFR 184.1323).
The NOSB, at its May 13–14, 2003,
meeting in Austin, TX, recommended
adding Glycerine oleate to § 205.601(m)
(2) of the National List regulations. In
this open meeting, the NOSB evaluated
Glycerine oleate against the evaluation
criteria of 7 U.S.C. 6517 and 6518 of the
OFPA, received public comment, and
concluded that the substance is
consistent with the OFPA evaluation
criteria; however, it recommended that
Glycerine oleate be added to the
National List regulations, for use in crop
production, only until December 31,
2006.
The normal time period for the use of
a substance under the NOP regulations
is 5 years, beginning the date the
substance appears in the National List
regulations. The NOSB recommended
the early expiration date of December
31, 2006, because of the present efforts
of the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to reclassify inerts on List 2
(Potentially Toxic Inert Ingredients/
High Priority for Testing Inerts) and List
3 (Inerts of Unknown Toxicity) to either
List 1 (Inert Ingredients of Toxicological
Concern) or List 4 (Inerts of Minimal
Concern) by December 31, 2006. With
respect to the use of EPA regulated inert
ingredients in organic crop and
livestock production, only substances
included on EPA’s List 4 are
categorically allowed on the National
List (§ 205.601(m)(i)); all other EPA inert
ingredients must be listed individually.
Glycerine oleate is a List 3 inert; the
NOSB anticipates that EPA will
conclude its reclassification of
Glycerine oleate to either a List 1 or List
4 status by December 31, 2006. If
Glycerine oleate is reclassified as a List
1 inert, it will be prohibited for use as
an inert ingredient for organic crop
production. If Glycerin oleate is
reclassified as a List 4 inert, then it will
automatically continue to be allowed for
use in organic crop production as an
inert ingredient. In addition, if EPA
does not complete its reclassification of
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
54662
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Glycerine oleate by December 31, 2006,
the substance will be prohibited for use
in organic crop production beginning on
January 1, 2007.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB
recommendation regarding the use of
Glycerine oleate in organic crop
production, the Secretary accepts the
NOSB recommendation and proposes to
amend § 205.601(m)(2) of the National
List regulation as follows:
Glycerine oleate (Glycerol
monooleate) (CAS #s 25496–72–4; 111–
03–5; 37220–82–9)—for use only until
December 31, 2006.
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (CAS #
97–99–4)—for use only until December
31, 2006. Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol
was petitioned for use as an inert
pesticidal ingredient for use in organic
crop production. Tetrahydrofurfuryl
alcohol is a clear, colorless liquid that
is used extensively in various industries
as a high-purity, water miscible solvent,
and as a chemical intermediate. If
released to soil, Tetrahydrofurfuryl
alcohol is expected to exhibit high
solubility.
Under FIFRA, the EPA has registered
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol as a List 3
inert (Inerts of Unknown Toxicity). In
addition, the FDA has classified
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol as a direct
food additive in synthetic flavoring
substances (21 CFR 172.515) and an
indirect food additive in adhesives and
the manufacture of paper and paper
adjuvants (21 CFR 175.105 and
176.210).
The NOSB, at its May 13–14, 2003,
meeting in Austin, TX, recommended
adding Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol to
§ 205.601(m)(2) of the National List
regulations. In this open meeting, the
NOSB evaluated Tetrahydrofurfuryl
alcohol against the evaluation criteria of
7 U.S.C. 6517 and 6518 of the OFPA,
received public comment, and
concluded that the substance is
consistent with the OFPA evaluation
criteria; however, it recommended that
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol be added to
the National List regulations, for use in
crop production, only until December
31, 2006.
The normal time period for the use of
a substance under the NOP regulations
is five years, beginning the date the
substance appears in the National List
regulations. The NOSB recommended
the early expiration date of December
31, 2006, because of the present efforts
of the EPA to reclassify inerts on List 2
(Potentially Toxic Inert Ingredients/
High Priority for Testing inerts) and List
3 (Inerts of Unkown Toxicity) to either
List 1 (Inert Ingredients of Toxicological
Concern) or List 4 (Inerts of Minimal
Concern) by December 31, 2006. With
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:38 Sep 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
respect to the use of EPA regulated inert
ingredients in organic crop and
livestock production, only substances
included on EPA’s List 4 are
categorically allowed on the National
List (§ 205.601(m)(i)); all other EPA inert
ingredients must be listed individually.
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol is a List 3
inert; the NOSB anticipates that EPA
will conclude its reclassification of
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol to either a
List 1 or List 4 status by December 31,
2006. If Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol is
reclassified as a List 1 inert, it will be
prohibited for use as an inert ingredient
for organic crop production. If
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol is
reclassified as a List 4 inert, then it will
automatically continue to be allowed for
use in organic crop production as an
inert ingredient. In addition, if EPA
does not complete its reclassification of
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol by December
31, 2006, the substance will be
prohibited for use in organic crop
production beginning on January 1,
2007.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB
recommendation regarding the use of
Tetrahydrofurfurly alcohol in organic
crop production, the Secretary accepts
the NOSB recommendation and
proposes to amend § 205.601(m)(2) of
the National List regulation as follows:
Tetrahydrofurfurly alcohol (CAS #
97–99–4)—for use only until December
31, 2006.
Hydrogen chloride (CAS # 7647–01–
0)—for de-linting cotton seed for
planting. Hydrogen chloride was
petitioned for use as a synthetic to
delint cotton seed for planting in
organic crop production. Hydrogen
chloride is a colorless to slightly yellow
gas with a pungent, irritating odor. It is
very soluble in water and readily
soluble in alcohol and ether. Hydrogen
chloride has been classified by the FDA
as a substance that is GRAS when used
as a buffer and neutralizing agent in
accordance with good manufacturing or
feeding practice (21 CFR 582.1057). In
delinting cotton seeds intended for
planting organic acreage, Hydrogen
chloride is released into a delinting
machine that contains linted cotton
seeds. Seed is exposed to the Hydrogen
chloride for about eight to ten minutes
to weaken the lint and is then sent
through buffers to remove the weakened
lint from the seed. After delinting, a
neutralizing agent (often Calcium
carbonate) is used to prevent acid
damage to the seed.
The NOSB, at its April 28–30, 2004,
meeting in Chicago, IL, recommended
adding Hydrogen chloride to § 205.601
of the National List regulations. In this
open meeting, the NOSB evaluated
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Hydrogen chloride against the
evaluation criteria of 7 U.S.C. 6517 and
6518 of the OFPA, received public
comment, and concluded that the
substance is consistent with the OFPA
evaluation criteria. Therefore, in
response to the NOSB recommendation
regarding the use of Hydrogen chloride
in organic crop production, the
Secretary accepts the NOSB
recommendation and proposes to
amend § 205.601 of the National List
regulations by adding (1) a new
paragraph (n), Seed preparations, and
(2) Hydrogen chloride as follows:
(n) Seed preparations.
Hydrogen chloride (CAS # 7647–01–
0)—for de-linting cotton seed for
planting.
Ferric phosphate (CAS # 10045–86–
0). Ferric phosphate was petitioned for
use as a pesticide (molluscicide) to bait
slugs and snails in organic crop
production. It is an odorless, yellowishwhite powder that is not very soluble in
water. Ferric phosphate is normally
applied to soil as part of a pellet that
includes a wheat-based bait to attract
snails and slugs. After the pellets are
consumed, Ferric phosphate interferes
with calcium metabolism in the
digestive tract of the snails and slugs,
causing them to stop eating. Shortly
thereafter, the snails and slugs die.
Under the FIFRA, the EPA has
registered ferric phosphate as a
biochemical molluscicide that targets a
wide range of slugs and snails (63 FR
43936). In assessing risks to human
health, EPA has concluded that there
are no known or expected adverse
effects to humans from the use of ferric
phosphate. In assessing risks to the
environment, the EPA has concluded
that there are no known or expected
harmful effects of the use of Ferric
phosphate on the environment if users
follow the application rates and use
directions on the label. In addition to
the assessments of the EPA, the FDA has
classified Ferric phosphate as a
substance that is GRAS for food use (21
CFR 184.1301).
The NOSB, at its February 28–March
3, 2005, meeting in Washington, DC,
recommended adding Ferric phosphate
to § 205.601(h) of the National List
regulations without restriction. In this
open meeting, the NOSB evaluated
Ferric phosphate against the evaluation
criteria of 7 U.S.C. 6517 and 6518 of the
OFPA, received public comment, and
concluded that the substance is
consistent with the OFPA evaluation
criteria. Therefore, in response to the
NOSB recommendation regarding the
use of Ferric phosphate in organic crop
production, the Secretary accepts the
NOSB recommendation and proposes to
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules
amend § 205.601(h) of the National List
regulations as follows:
Ferric phosphate (CAS # 10045–86–
0).
Section 205.605 Nonagricultural
(Nonorganic) Substances Allowed as
Ingredients in or on Processed Products
Labeled as ‘‘Organic’’ or ‘‘Made With
Organic (Specified Ingredients or Food
Group(s))’’
This proposed rule would amend
§ 205.605 (a) of the regulations by
adding the following substances:
Egg white lysozyme (CAS # 9001–63–
2). Egg white lysozyme was petitioned
for use as an enzyme in organic
processing. It is a white powder with no
distinct odor. It is readily soluble in
water and practically insoluble in
alcohol, chloroform, and ether. Egg
white lysozyme is considered to be
GRAS by the FDA for use as an
antimicrobial agent in casings for
frankfurters and on cooked meat and
poultry products. Egg white lysozyme is
used in casings for frankfurters at a
concentration of 2.5 milligram (mg)
lysozyme per pound (lb) of frankfurter
(equivalent to 5.5 mg Lysozyme per
kilogram (kg) of food) and in cooked
meat and poultry products sold as
ready-to-eat at a concentration of 2.0 mg
of Lysozyme per lb of cooked meat or
poultry product (equivalent to 4.4 mg of
Lysozyme per kg of food). The FDA
acknowledged in GRAS Notice No.
(GRN) 000064 that it had no question,
at the time of review, that Egg white
lysozyme is GRAS under the intended
conditions of use; provided, that the
ingredient statement of food products
that contain Egg white lysozyme contain
the name ‘‘Egg white lysozyme’’ to
identify the source of the protein.
The NOSB, at its May 13–14, 2003,
meeting in Austin, TX, recommended
adding Egg white lysozyme to
§ 205.605(a) of the National List
regulations without restriction. In this
open meeting, the NOSB evaluated Egg
white lysozyme against the evaluation
criteria of 7 U.S.C. 6517 and 6518 of the
OFPA, received public comment, and
concluded that the substance is
consistent with the OFPA evaluation
criteria. Therefore, in response to the
NOSB recommendation regarding the
use of Egg white lysozyme in organic
handling, the Secretary accepts the
NOSB recommendation and proposes to
amend § 205.605(a) of the National List
regulations as follows:
Egg white lysozyme (CAS # 9001–63–
2).
L-Malic acid (CAS # 97–67–6). DLMalic acid was originally petitioned for
use as a synthetic processing aid in
organic handling. It is a white or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:38 Sep 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
colorless powder with no odor. It is
readily biodegradable in water and in
soil. DL-Malic acid is considered to be
GRAS by FDA (21 CFR 184.1069). It is
a processing aid that is used in bottled
iced tea, dry mix beverages, carbonated
beverages, bakery products, fruit juices,
candies, gelatins, desserts, frozen
specialties, sports drinks, and other food
products.
The NOSB, at its May 13–14, 2003,
meeting in Austin, TX, evaluated DLMalic acid in an open meeting, received
public comment, and concluded that the
substance was not consistent with the
evaluation criteria of 7 U.S.C. 6517 and
6518 of the OFPA. This determination
was made because of an identified
available natural alternative, L-Malic
acid. As a result of having identified a
natural alternative to DL-malic acid, the
NOSB asked the petitioner whether LMalic acid, a natural, could be
substituted for DL-Malic acid for
inclusion on the National List. The
petitioner concurred and the NOSB
recommended L-Malic acid for
inclusion in section 205.605(a) of the
National List. Therefore, in response to
the NOSB recommendation regarding
the use of L-Malic acid in organic
handling, the Secretary accepts the
NOSB recommendation and proposes to
amend § 205.605 (a) of the National List
regulations as follows:
L-Malic acid (CAS # 97–67–6).
Microorganisms—any food grade
bacteria, fungi, and other
microorganisms. Seed mold, a
microorganism, was petitioned for use
as a processing aid in organic handling.
Seed mold is used as a culture starter in
food processing. In the evaluation of
seed mold, the NOSB recognized that
they had previously evaluated and
determined other types of food-grade
microorganisms (e.g., dairy cultures and
yeast) and certain by-products derived
from them (e.g., enzymes) to be
consistent with OFPA criteria and the
NOP regulations. These microorganisms
are already included on the National
List.
The NOSB acknowledged that there
are many species of food-grade
microorganisms that are used in food
processing that could be petitioned for
use in organic handling. As a result, a
decision was made by the NOSB to
evaluate the categorical use of foodgrade microorganisms in organic
handling and recommend their
inclusion in section 205.605(a) of the
National List. This decision would
obviate the need for future review and
evaluation of other individual food
grade microorganisms that exhibit
similar characteristics and functions as
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54663
those already approved for use on the
National List.
At its May 13–14, 2003, meeting in
Austin, TX, the NOSB recommended
adding microorganisms to § 205.605(a)
of the National List regulations without
restriction. In this open meeting, the
NOSB evaluated the categorical use of
microorganisms in organic handling
against 7 U.S.C. 6517 and 6518 of the
OFPA, received public comment, and
concluded that the use of
microorganisms in organic handling is
consistent with the evaluation criteria.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB
recommendation regarding the use of
microorganisms in organic handling, the
Secretary accepts the NOSB
recommendation and proposes to
amend § 205.605(a) of the National List
regulations as follows:
Microorganisms—any food grade
bacteria, fungi, and other
microorganisms.
This proposed rule would also amend
§ 205.605(b) of the regulations by adding
the following substances:
Activated charcoal (CAS #s 7440–44–
0; 64365–11–3)—only from vegetative
sources; for use only as a filtering aid in
handling agricultural products labeled
‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’ Activated
charcoal was petitioned for use as a
processing aid in organic handling.
Activated charcoal is a solid, porous,
black carbonaceous material that is used
as a decolorizing agent, taste- and odorremoving agent, and purification agent
in food processing. It is also used for the
treatment of water, including potable
water. Activated charcoal is
acknowledged by FDA in 21 CFR
173.25(b)(1)(ii) to be an allowed
substance for use in ion exchange. It is
also recognized as an indirect food
additive in closures with sealing gaskets
for food containers (21 CFR 177.1210).
At its September 17–19, 2002,
meeting in Austin, TX, the NOSB
recommended adding activated charcoal
to § 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations for organic handling, with
the restrictions that the substance: (1)
Comes from vegetative sources only;
and (2) only be used as a filtering aid.
In this open meeting, the NOSB
evaluated the use of activated charcoal
against the evaluation criteria of
§ 205.600(b) of the National List
regulations, received public comment,
and concluded that the use of activated
charcoal in organic handling is
consistent with the evaluation criteria.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB
recommendation regarding the use of
activated charcoal in organic handling,
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
54664
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules
the Secretary proposes to amend
§ 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations to allow activated charcoal
as a synthetic ingredient in or on
processed products labeled as ‘‘made
with organic (specified ingredients or
food group(s))’’ as follows:
Activated charcoal (CAS #s 7440–44–
0; 64365–11–3)—only from vegetative
sources; for use only as a filtering aid in
handling agricultural products labeled
‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
Ammonium hydroxide (CAS # 1336–
21–6)—for use only as a boiler water
additive until October 21, 2005.
Restricted to handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘made with organic
(specified ingredients or food
group(s));’’ prohibited in handling
agricultural products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
Ammonium hydroxide was petitioned
as a boiler water additive in organic
handling. It is a colorless liquid with an
intense odor. It is used in preventing the
corrosion of boiler equipment used in
food processing. Ammonium hydroxide
is considered to be GRAS by FDA and
allowed as a boiler water additive under
21 CFR 184.1139.
At its October 15–17, 2001, meeting in
Washington, DC, the NOSB
recommended adding Ammonium
hydroxide to § 205.605(b) of the
National List regulations, with the
restriction that it can only be used in
organic handling until October 21, 2005.
In this open meeting, the NOSB
evaluated the use of Ammonium
hydroxide against the evaluation criteria
of § 205.600(b) of the National List
regulations, received public comment,
and concluded that the use of
Ammonium hydroxide in organic
handling is consistent with the
evaluation criteria.
Although the NOSB determined
Ammonium hydroxide to be consistent
with the evaluation criteria of
§ 205.600(b), it recommended an early
expiration date of October 21, 2005, for
the use of the substance, to encourage
the organic processing industry to find
an alternative substance to use in place
of the Ammonium hydroxide. The
normal time period for the use of a
substance under the NOP regulations is
5 years, beginning the date the
substance appears in the National List
regulations.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB
recommendation regarding the use of
Ammonium hydroxide in organic
handling, the Secretary proposes to
amend § 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations to allow Ammonium
hydroxide as a synthetic ingredient in or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:38 Sep 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
on processed products labeled as ‘‘made
with organic (specified ingredients or
food group(s))’’ as follows:
Ammonium hydroxide (CAS # 1336–
21–6)—for use only as a boiler water
additive until October 21, 2005.
Restricted to handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘made with organic
(specified ingredients or food
group(s));’’ prohibited in handling
agricultural products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
Cyclohexylamine (CAS # 108–91–8)—
for use only as a boiler water additive
for packaging sterilization. Restricted to
handling agricultural products labeled
‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
Cyclohexylamine was petitioned as a
boiler water additive in organic
handling. Cyclohexylamine is a
colorless to yellow liquid that has a
strong, fishy odor. It is miscible with
water and with common organic
solvents. It is used to prevent the
corrosion of boiler equipment used in
food processing. Cyclohexylamine is
approved for use as a secondary direct
food additive and boiler water additive
by FDA under 21 CFR 173.310.
At its October 15–17, 2001, meeting in
Washington, DC, the NOSB
recommended adding Cyclohexlamine
to § 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations for organic handling, with
the restriction that it be used as a boiler
water additive for packaging
sterilization only. In this open meeting,
the NOSB evaluated the use of
Cyclohexlamine against the evaluation
criteria of § 205.600(b) of the National
List regulations, received public
comment, and concluded that the use of
Cyclohexlamine in organic handling is
consistent with the evaluation criteria.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB
recommendation regarding the use of
Cyclohexlamine in organic handling,
the Secretary proposes to amend
§ 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations to allow Cyclohexlamine as
a synthetic ingredient in or on
processed products labeled as ‘‘made
with organic (specified ingredients or
food group(s))’’ as follows:
Cyclohexylamine (CAS # 108–91–8)—
for use only as a boiler water additive
for packaging sterilization. Restricted to
handling agricultural products labeled
‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
Diethylaminoethanol (CAS # 100–37–
8)—for use only as a boiler water
additive for packaging sterilization;
restricted to handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘made with organic
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(specified ingredients or food
group(s));’’ prohibited for use in
handling agricultural products labeled
‘‘organic.’’ Diethlaminoethanol was
petitioned as a boiler water additive in
organic handling. Diethylaminoethanol
is a colorless liquid with a weak
ammonia odor. It is hygroscopic soluble
in water, alcohol, Acetone, Benzene,
and Petroleum ether.
Diethlaminoethanol inhibits corrosion
in boiler chemical systems in return
lines, by neutralizing Carbonic acid in
steam and steam condensates, and by
scavenging free Oxygen. It is used in
conjunction with Cyclohexylamine,
Morpholine, and Octadecylamine.
Diethylaminoethanol is approved for
use as a secondary direct food additive
and boiler water additive by FDA under
21 CFR 173.310.
At its May 6–8, 2002, meeting in
Austin, TX, the NOSB recommended
adding Diethylaminoethanol to
§ 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations for organic handling, with
the restriction that it be used as a boiler
water additive for packaging
sterilization only. In this open meeting,
the NOSB evaluated the use of
Diethylaminoethanol against the
evaluation criteria of § 205.600(b) of the
National List regulations, received
public comment, and concluded that the
use of Diethylaminoethanol in organic
handling is consistent with the
evaluation criteria.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB
recommendation regarding the use of
Diethylaminoethanol in organic
handling, the Secretary proposes to
amend § 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations to allow
Diethylaminoethanol as a synthetic
ingredient in or on processed products
labeled as ‘‘made with organic
(specified ingredients or food group(s))’’
as follows:
Diethylaminoethanol (CAS # 100–37–
8)—for use only as a boiler water
additive for packaging sterilization.
Restricted to handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘made with organic
(specified ingredients or food
group(s));’’ prohibited for use in
handling agricultural products labeled
‘‘organic.’’
Octadecylamine (CAS # 124–30–1)—
for use only as a boiler water additive
for packaging sterilization. Restricted to
handling agricultural products labeled
‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited for use in handling
agricultural products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
Octadecylamine was petitioned for use
as a boiler water additive to prevent
corrosion of boiler equipment and
distribution lines. Octadecylamine is an
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules
opaque, off-white liquid with
ammoniacal odor, insoluble in water but
soluble in alcohol, Ether, Benzene; very
soluble in Chloroform; and miscible in
Acetone. Octadecylamine is approved
for use as a secondary direct food
additive and boiler water additive by
FDA under 21 CFR 173.310.
At its October 15–17, 2001, meeting in
Washington, DC, the NOSB
recommended adding Octadecylamine
to § 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations for organic handling, with
the restriction that it be used as a boiler
water additive for packaging
sterilization only. In this open meeting,
the NOSB evaluated the use of
Octadecylamine against the evaluation
criteria of § 205.600(b) of the National
List regulations, received public
comment, and concluded that the use of
Octadecylamine in organic handling is
consistent with the evaluation criteria.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB
recommendation regarding the use of
Octadecylamine in organic handling,
the Secretary proposes to amend
§ 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations to allow Octadecylamine as
a synthetic ingredient in or on
processed products labeled as ‘‘made
with organic (specified ingredients or
food group(s))’’ as follows:
Octadecylamine (CAS # 124–30–1)—
for use only as a boiler water additive
for packaging sterilization. Restricted to
handling agricultural products labeled
‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited for use in handling
agricultural products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid (CAS
# 79–21–0)—for use in wash and/or
rinse water according to FDA
limitations. For use as a sanitizer on
food contact surfaces. Restricted to use
in handling agricultural products
labeled ‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited in agricultural products
labeled ‘‘organic.’’ Peracetic acid was
petitioned as an anti-microbial water
treatment additive and/or as an
equipment sanitizer or disinfectant. Its
most common use in food processing
and handling is as a sanitizer for food
contact surfaces and as a disinfectant for
fruits, vegetables, meats, and eggs. Other
uses of Peracetic acid include removing
deposits, suppressing odor, and
stripping biofilms from food contact
surfaces. Peracetic acid is a clear
colorless liquid with no foaming
capability, and has a strong pungent
odor. It is approved by FDA as a
secondary direct food additive used in
the washing or peeling of fruits and
vegetables (21 CFR 173.315). It is also
approved for use as an indirect food
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:38 Sep 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
additive, sanitizer, under 21 CFR
178.1010.
At its November 15–17, 2000, meeting
in Washington, DC, the NOSB
recommended adding Peracetic acid to
§ 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations for organic handling, with
the restrictions that it be allowed: (1)
For direct food contact only in wash
and/or rinse water; and (2) as a sanitizer
on surfaces in contact with organic food.
In this open meeting, the NOSB
evaluated the use of Peracetic acid
against the evaluation criteria of
§ 205.600(b) of the National List
regulations, received public comment,
and concluded that the use of Peracetic
acid in organic handling is consistent
with the evaluation criteria.
In accepting the NOSB
recommendation to allow Peracetic acid
in organic handling, this proposed rule
proposes language for including
Peracetic acid on the National List that
differs from the original NOSB
recommendation. The original wording
of the NOSB recommendation submitted
to the Secretary was as follows:
‘‘Peracetic acid—for direct food contact
only in wash and/or rinse water, as a
sanitizer on surfaces in contact with
organic food.’’ The NOP did not elect to
use that language because of the
confusion the language could cause
when referencing the use of Peracetic
acid (Peroxyacetic acid) against FDA
regulations.
For instance, the recommended NOSB
language references ‘‘Peracetic acid’’ as
the common name of the substance, but
FDA regulations reference ‘‘Peroxyacetic
acid,’’ in 21 CFR 173.315, for the
washing or peeling of fruits and
vegetables. Also, FDA regulations
restrict the use of Peracetic acid/
Peroxyacetic acid on fruits and
vegetables that are not raw agricultural
commodities. Based on this information,
the NOP determined that the original
NOSB recommendation could cause
handlers that use Peracetic acid/
Peroxyacetic acid to believe that the
substance could be used on all
agricultural products. As a result, this
proposed rule attempts to limit
confusion regarding the proposed use of
Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid in the
handling of ‘‘made with * * *’’
products by including language that
acknowledges the FDA use limitations.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB
recommendation regarding the use of
Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid in
organic handling, the Secretary
proposes to amend § 205.605(b) of the
National List regulations to allow
Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid as a
synthetic ingredient in or on processed
products labeled as ‘‘made with organic
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54665
(specified ingredients or food group(s))’’
as follows:
Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid (CAS
# 79–21–0)—for use in wash and/or
rinse water according to FDA
limitations. For use as a sanitizer on
food contact surfaces. Restricted to use
in handling agricultural products
labeled ‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
Sodium acid pyrophosphate (CAS #
7758–16–9)—for use only as a leavening
agent in agricultural products labeled
‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’ Sodium
acid pyrophosphate was petitioned for
use as a leavening agent in baked goods.
It helps to control the release of Carbon
dioxide that leavens baked goods. It can
be either anhydrous or contain one or
more molecules of water of hydration.
The anhydrous forms are white,
crystalline powders or granules. The
hydrated forms occur as white or
transparent crystals or granules. When
used in accordance with good
manufacturing practices, Sodium acid
pyrophosphate is considered to be
GRAS by FDA under 21 CFR 182.1087.
At its May 13–14, 2003, meeting in
Austin, TX, the NOSB recommended
adding Sodium acid pyrophosphate to
§ 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations for organic handling, with
the restriction that it only be used as a
leavening agent. In this open meeting,
the NOSB evaluated Sodium acid
pyrophosphate against the evaluation
criteria of § 205.600(b) of the National
List regulations, received public
comment, and concluded that the use of
Sodium acid pyrophosphate in organic
handling is consistent with the
evaluation criteria.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB
recommendation regarding the use of
Sodium acid pyrophosphate in organic
handling, the Secretary proposes to
amend § 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations to allow Sodium acid
pyrophosphate as a synthetic ingredient
in or on processed products labeled as
‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s))’’ as
follows:
Sodium acid pyrophosphate (CAS #
7758–16–9)—for use only as a leavening
agent in agricultural products labeled
‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
Tetrasodium pyrophosphate (CAS #
7722–88–5)—for use only in meat
analog products labeled ‘‘made with
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
54666
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules
organic (specified ingredients or food
group(s));’’ prohibited in handling
agricultural products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
In a proposed rule, published May 22,
2003 (68 FR 27941), § 205.605(b) of the
regulations was proposed to be
amended by adding Tetrasodium
pyrophosphate to be used only in
textured meat analog products. In
response to the proposal to add
Tetrasodium pyrophospate on the
National List regulations, we received
six public comments, three in favor of
and three opposed to its inclusion.
Regarding the comments that opposed
the inclusion of Tetrasodium
pyrophosphate on the National List
regulations, commenters expressed
concern that the recommended
annotation was vague, confusing,
undefined and needed clarification.
They stated that the primary use of
Tetrasodium pyrophosphate, as
proposed, appeared to be to create
texture that is similar to a meat product.
They also asserted that such a use
would be in direct conflict with the
criterion in § 205.600(b)(4) of the
regulations that emphasizes ‘‘the
substance’s primary use is not as a
preservative or to recreate or improve
flavors, colors, textures, or nutritive
value lost during processing, except
where the replacement of nutrients is
required by law.’’
Due to the merit of those comments,
on March 3, 2003 (68 FR 62215), we did
not add Tetrasodium pyrophosphate on
the National List and referred the
substance back to the NOSB for further
deliberation as to whether the proposed
use of Tetrasodium pyrophosphate
conflicts with § 205.600 (b)(4) of the
NOP regulations. Through further
review and deliberation at their April
2004 meeting in Chicago, IL, the NOSB
determined that the proposed use of
Tetrasodium pyrophosphate did not
conflict with § 205.600 (b)(4) of the NOP
regulations. In response to the concerns
of the commenters, the NOSB provided
that the primary use of Tetrasodium
pyrophosphate, as petitioned, is not to
serve as a preservative, or to ‘‘recreate’’
flavor, color or texture. They
acknowledged that the substance may
be used to create texture; however, it is
not being used to ‘‘recreate’’ texture, as
is referenced in § 205.600 (b)(4) of the
regulations. Rather, it is being proposed
to add Tetrasodium pyrophosphate to
§ 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations as follows:
Tetrasodium pyrophosphate (CAS #
7722–88–5)—for use only in meat
analog products labeled ‘‘made with
organic (specified ingredients or food
group(s));’’ prohibited in handling
agricultural products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:38 Sep 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
Section 205.681
B. Executive Order 12988
Appeals
This proposed rule would amend
§ 205.681(d)(1) of the regulations by
updating the mailing address for where
to file a Certification or Accreditation
appeal as follows:
Administrator, USDA, AMS, c/o NOP
Appeals Staff, Stop 0203, Room 3529–
S, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0203.
III. Related Documents
Seven notices were published
regarding the meetings of the NOSB and
its deliberations on recommendations
and substances petitioned for amending
the National List. Substances and
recommendations included in this
proposed rule were announced for
NOSB deliberation in the following
Federal Register Notices: (1) 65 FR
64657, October 30, 2000, (Peracetic
acid); (2) 66 FR 48654, September 21,
2001, (Ammonium hydroxide,
Cyclohexlamine, and Octadecylamine);
(3) 67 FR 19375, April 19, 2002,
(Diethylaminoethanol); (4) 67 FR 54784,
August 26, 2002, (Activated charcoal);
(5) 68 FR 23277, May 1, 2003, (Egg
white lysozyme, Glycerine oleate,
L-Malic acid, Microorganisms, Sodium
acid pyrophosphate and
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol); (6) 69 FR
18036, April 6, 2004, (Hydrogen
Chloride, and Tetrasodium
pyrophosphate); and (7) 70 FR 7224,
February 11, 2005, (Ferric phosphate).
IV. Statutory and Regulatory Authority
The OFPA, as amended (7 U.S.C. 6501
et seq.), authorizes the Secretary to
make amendments to the National List
based on proposed amendments
developed by the NOSB. Sections
6518(k)(2) and 6518(n) of OFPA
authorizes the NOSB to develop
proposed amendments to the National
List for submission to the Secretary and
establishes a petition process by which
persons may petition the NOSB for the
purpose of having substances evaluated
for inclusion on or deletion from the
National List, respectively. The National
List petition process is implemented
under § 205.607 of the NOP regulations.
The current petition process (65 FR
43259) can be accessed through the NOP
Web site at https://www.ams.usda.gov/
nop.
A. Executive Order 12866
This action has been determined to be
non-significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866, and therefore,
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Executive Order 12988 instructs each
executive agency to adhere to certain
requirements in the development of new
and revised regulations in order to avoid
unduly burdening the court system.
This proposed rule is not intended to
have a retroactive effect.
States and local jurisdictions are
preempted under section 2115 of the
OFPA (7 U.S.C. 6514) from creating
programs of accreditation for private
persons or State officials who want to
become certifying agents of organic
farms or handling operations. A
governing State official would have to
apply to USDA to be accredited as a
certifying agent, as described in section
2115(b) of the OFPA (7 U.S.C. 6514(b)).
States are also preempted under
sections 2104 through 2108 of the OFPA
(7 U.S.C. 6503 through 6507) from
creating certification programs to certify
organic farms or handling operations
unless the State programs have been
submitted to, and approved by, the
Secretary as meeting the requirements of
the OFPA.
Pursuant to section 2108(b)(2) of the
OFPA (7 U.S.C. 6507(b)(2)), a State
organic certification program may
contain additional requirements for the
production and handling of organically
produced agricultural products that are
produced in the State and for the
certification of organic farm and
handling operations located within the
State under certain circumstances. Such
additional requirements must: (a)
Further the purposes of the OFPA, (b)
not be inconsistent with the OFPA, (c)
not be discriminatory toward
agricultural commodities organically
produced in other States, and (d) not be
effective until approved by the
Secretary.
Pursuant to section 2120(f) of the
OFPA (7 U.S.C. 6519 (f)), this proposed
rule would not alter the authority of the
Secretary under the Federal Meat
Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.),
the Poultry Products Inspections Act (21
U.S.C. 451 et seq.), or the Egg Products
Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1031 et seq.),
concerning meat, poultry, and egg
products, nor any of the authorities of
the Secretary of Health and Human
Services under the Federal Food, Drug
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et
seq.), nor the authority of the
Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and
Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.).
Section 2121 of the OFPA (7 U.S.C.
6520) provides for the Secretary to
establish an expedited administrative
appeals procedure under which persons
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules
may appeal an action of the Secretary,
the applicable governing State official,
or a certifying agent under this title that
adversely affects such person or is
inconsistent with the organic
certification program established under
this title. The OFPA also provides that
the U.S. District Court for the district in
which a person is located has
jurisdiction to review the Secretary’s
decision.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires agencies
to consider the economic impact of each
rule on small entities and evaluate
alternatives that would accomplish the
objectives of the rule without unduly
burdening small entities or erecting
barriers that would restrict their ability
to compete in the market. The purpose
is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to the action. Section
605 of the RFA allows an agency to
certify a rule, in lieu of preparing an
analysis, if the rulemaking is not
expected to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the RFA, the Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) performed an economic
impact analysis on small entities in the
final rule published in the Federal
Register on December 21, 2000 (65 FR
80548). The AMS has also considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities. The impact on entities
affected by this proposed rule would not
be significant. The effect of this
proposed rule would be to allow the use
of additional substances in agricultural
production and handling. This action
would relax the regulations published
in the final rule and would provide
small entities with more tools to use in
day-to-day operations. The AMS
concludes that the economic impact of
this addition of allowed substances, if
any, would be minimal and entirely
beneficial to small agricultural service
firms. Accordingly, USDA certifies that
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Small agricultural service firms,
which include producers, handlers, and
accredited certifying agents, have been
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201)
as those having annual receipts of less
than $6,000,000 and small agricultural
producers are defined as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000.
This proposed rule would have an
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:38 Sep 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
The U.S. organic industry at the end
of 2001 included nearly 6,600 certified
crop and livestock operations, including
organic production and handling
operations, producers, and handlers.
These operations reported certified
acreage totaling more than 2.34 million
acres, 72,209 certified livestock, and
5.01 million certified poultry. Data on
the numbers of certified handling
operations are not yet available, but
likely number in the thousands, as they
would include any operation that
transforms raw product into processed
products using organic ingredients.
Growth in the U.S. organic industry has
been significant at all levels. From 1997
to 2001, the total organic acreage grew
by 74 percent; livestock numbers
certified organic grew by almost 300
percent over the same period, and
poultry certified organic increased by
2,118 percent over this time. Sales
growth of organic products has been
equally significant, growing on average
around 20 percent per year. Sales of
organic products were approximately $1
billion in 1993, but reached $15 billion
in 2004. In addition, USDA has
accredited 97 certifying agents who
have applied to USDA to be accredited
in order to provide certification services
to producers and handlers. A complete
list of names and addresses of
accredited certifying agents may be
found on the AMS NOP Web site, at
https://www.ams.usda.gov/nop. AMS
believes that most of these entities
would be considered small entities
under the criteria established by the
SBA.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq., the
existing information collection
requirements for the NOP are approved
under OMB number 0581–0191. No
additional collection or recordkeeping
requirements are imposed on the public
by this proposed rule. Accordingly,
OMB clearance is not required by
section 350(h) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, or OMB’s implementing
regulation at 5 CFR part 1320.
E. General Notice of Public Rulemaking
This proposed rule reflects
recommendations submitted to the
Secretary by the NOSB and includes an
amendment to the mailing address for
where to file a Certification or
Accreditation Appeal. The seven
substances proposed to be added to the
National List were based on petitions
from the industry. The NOSB evaluated
each petition using criteria in the OFPA.
Because these substances are critical to
organic production and handling
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54667
operations, producers and handlers
should be able to use them in their
operations as soon as possible. A 60-day
period for interested persons to
comment on this rule is provided.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 205
Administrative practice and
procedure, Agriculture, Animals,
Archives and records, Imports, Labeling,
Organically produced products, Plants,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Seals and insignia, Soil
conservation.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 205, Subpart G is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 205—NATIONAL ORGANIC
PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 205 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6501–6522.
2. Section 205.601 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (h).
b. Revising paragraph (m)(2).
c. Adding a new paragraph (n).
d. Reserving paragraphs (o)–(z).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 205.601 Synthetic substance allowed for
use in organic crop production.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) As slug or snail bait. Ferric
phosphate (CAS # 10045–86–0).
*
*
*
*
*
(m) * * *
(2) EPA List 3—Inerts of Unknown
Toxicity allowed:
(i) Glycerine Oleate (Glycerol
monooleate) (CAS #s 25496–72–4; 111–
03–5; 37220–82–9)—for use only until
December 31, 2006.
(ii) Inerts used in passive pheromone
dispensers.
(iii) Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (CAS
# 97–99–4)—for use only until
December 31, 2006.
(n) Seed preparations. Hydrogen
chloride (CAS # 7647–01–0)—for
delinting cotton seed for planting.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 205.605 is amended by:
a. Adding three materials to paragraph
(a).
b. Adding 8 new substances to
paragraph (b).
The additions read as follows:
§ 205.605 Nonagricultural (nonorganic)
substances allowed as ingredients in or on
processed products labeled as ‘‘organic’’ or
‘‘made with organic (specified ingredients
or food group(s)).’’
*
*
*
(a) * * *
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
*
*
*
*
54668
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Egg white lysozyme (CAS # 9001–63–
2)
*
*
*
*
*
L-Malic acid (CAS # 97–67–6).
*
*
*
*
*
Microorganisms—any food grade
bacteria, fungi, and other
microorganism.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
Activated charcoal (CAS #s 7440–44–
0; 64365–11–3)—only from vegetative
sources; for use only as a filtering aid in
handling agricultural products labeled
‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
*
*
*
*
*
Ammonium hydroxide (CAS # 1336–
21–6)—for use only as a boiler water
additive until October 21, 2005.
Restricted to handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘made with organic
(specified ingredients or food
group(s));’’ prohibited in handling
agricultural products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
*
*
*
*
*
Cyclohexylamine (CAS # 108–91–8)—
for use only as a boiler water additive
for packaging sterilization. Restricted to
handling agricultural products labeled
‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
Diethylaminoethanol (CAS # 100–37–
8)—for use only as a boiler water
additive for packaging sterilization.
Restricted to handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘made with organic
(specified ingredients or food
group(s));’’ prohibited for use in
handling agricultural products labeled
‘‘organic.’’
*
*
*
*
*
Octadecylamine (CAS # 124–30–1)—
for use only as a boiler water additive
for packaging sterilization. Restricted to
handling agricultural products labeled
‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited for use in handling
agricultural products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
*
*
*
*
*
Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid (CAS
# 79–21–0)—for use in wash and/or
rinse water according to FDA
limitations. For use as a sanitizer on
food contact surfaces. Restricted to use
in handling agricultural products
labeled ‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
*
*
*
*
*
Sodium acid pyrophosphate (CAS #
7758–16–9)—for use only as a leavening
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:38 Sep 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
agent in agricultural products labeled
‘‘made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));’’
prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
*
*
*
*
*
Tetrasodium pyrophosphate (CAS #
7722–88–5)—for use only in meat
analog products labeled ‘‘made with
organic (specified ingredients or food
group(s));’’ prohibited in handling
agricultural products labeled ‘‘organic.’’
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 205.681, paragraph (d)(1) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 205.681
Appeals.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * * (1) Appeals to the
Administrator must be filed in writing
and addressed to: Administrator, USDA,
AMS, c/o NOP Appeals Staff, Stop 0203,
Room 3529–S, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
0203
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 12, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–18381 Filed 9–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22423; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–068–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 747–200C and –200F Series
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to
supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) that applies to certain
Boeing Model 747–200C and –200F
series airplanes. The existing AD
currently requires repetitive inspections
to find fatigue cracking in the upper
chord of the upper deck floor beams,
and repair if necessary. For certain
airplanes, the existing AD also provides
an optional repair/modification, which
extends certain repetitive inspection
intervals. This proposed AD would
reduce the compliance time for all
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
initial inspections and reduce the
repetitive interval for a certain
inspection. This proposed AD is
prompted by new reports of cracks in
the upper deck floor beams occurring at
lower flight cycles. We are proposing
this AD to find and fix cracking in
certain upper deck floor beams. Such
cracking could extend and sever floor
beams at a floor panel attachment hole
location and could result in rapid
decompression and loss of
controllability of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by October 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site:
Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207.
You can examine the contents of this
AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street
SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of
the Nassif Building, Washington, DC.
This docket number is FAA–2005–
22423; the directorate identifier for this
docket is 2005–NM–068–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan
Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 917–6437;
fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2005–22423; Directorate Identifier
2005–NM–068–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54660-54668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18381]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 205
[Docket Number TM-04-01]
RIN 0581-AC35
National Organic Program (NOP): Proposed Amendments to the
National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances (Crops and
Processing)
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would amend the U.S. Department of
Agriculture's (USDA) National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances
[[Page 54661]]
(National List) regulations to reflect recommendations submitted to the
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) by the National Organic Standards
Board (NOSB) from November 15, 2000, through March 3, 2005. Consistent
with the recommendations from the NOSB, this proposed rule would add
fifteen substances, along with any restrictive annotations, to the
National List. This proposed rule would also amend the mailing address
for where to file a Certification or Accreditation appeal.
DATES: Comments must be received by November 15, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons may comment on this proposed rule using
the following procedures:
Mail: Comments may be submitted by mail to: Arthur Neal,
Director of Program Administration, National Organic Program, USDA-AMS-
TMP-NOP, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Room 4008-So., Ag Stop 0268,
Washington, DC 20250.
E-mail: Comments may be submitted via the Internet to:
National.List@usda.gov.
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov.
Fax: Comments may be submitted by fax to: (202) 205-7808.
Written comments on this proposed rule should be
identified with the docket number TMD-04-01. Commenters should identify
the topic and section number of this proposed rule to which the comment
refers.
Clearly indicate if you are for or against the proposed
rule or some portion of it and your reason for it. Include recommended
language changes as appropriate.
Include a copy of articles or other references that
support your comments. Only relevant material should be submitted.
It is our intention to have all comments to this proposed rule,
whether submitted by mail, e-mail, or fax, available for viewing on the
NOP homepage. Comments submitted in response to this proposed rule will
be available for viewing in person at USDA-AMS, Transportation and
Marketing, Room 4008-South Building, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC, from 9 a.m. to 12 noon and from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday (except official Federal holidays). Persons
wanting to visit the USDA South Building to view comments received in
response to this proposed rule are requested to make an appointment in
advance by calling (202) 720-3252.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arthur Neal, Director of Program
Administration, Telephone: (202) 720-3252; Fax: (202) 205-7808.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On December 21, 2000, the Secretary established, within the NOP [7
CFR part 205], the National List regulations (Sec. Sec. 205.600
through 205.607). The National List regulations identify synthetic
substances and ingredients that are allowed and nonsynthetic (natural)
substances and ingredients that are prohibited for use in organic
production and handling. Under the authority of the Organic Foods
Production Act of 1990 (OFPA), as amended, (7 U.S.C. 6501 et seq.), the
National List can be amended by the Secretary based on proposed
amendments developed by the NOSB. Since established, the National List
has been amended twice, October 31, 2003 (68 FR 61987), and November 3,
2003 (68 FR 62215).
This proposed rule would amend the National List to reflect
recommendations submitted to the Secretary by the NOSB from November
15, 2000, through March 3, 2005. Between the specified time period, the
NOSB has recommended that the Secretary add four substances to Sec.
205.601 and eleven substances to Sec. 205.605 of the National List
regulations. This proposed rule would also amend the mailing address
for where to file a Certification or Accreditation appeal pursuant to
Sec. 205.681(d).
II. Overview of Proposed Amendments
The following provides an overview of the proposed amendments to
designated sections of the National List regulations:
Section 205.601 Synthetic Substances Allowed for Use in Organic Crop
Production
This proposed rule would amend paragraph (m)(2) of Sec. 205.601 of
the regulations by adding the following substances:
Glycerine oleate (Glycerol monooleate) (CAS s 25496-72-4;
111-03-5; 37220-82-9)--for use only until December 31, 2006. Glycerine
oleate was petitioned to be used as an anti-foaming agent (defoamer) in
organic crop production. Glycerine oleate is a clear amber or pale
yellow liquid that is insoluble in water, slightly soluble in cold
alcohol, and soluble in hot alcohol, chloroform, ether, and petroleum
ether. In crop production, Glycerin oleate would be used as an anti-
foaming agent (defoamer) in micronized wettable Sulfur that is used to
control scab and mildew in the production of apples, pears, grapes, and
raisins. The function of Glycerine oleate in the micronized wettable
Sulfur would be to enable the product to be mixed in a tank effectively
and sprayed on crops evenly.
Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified
Glycerine oleate as a List 3 inert (Inerts of Unknown Toxicity). Under
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Glycerin monooleate (a synonym
for Glycerin oleate) has been classified as a substance that is
Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) for food production (21 CFR
184.1323).
The NOSB, at its May 13-14, 2003, meeting in Austin, TX,
recommended adding Glycerine oleate to Sec. 205.601(m) (2) of the
National List regulations. In this open meeting, the NOSB evaluated
Glycerine oleate against the evaluation criteria of 7 U.S.C. 6517 and
6518 of the OFPA, received public comment, and concluded that the
substance is consistent with the OFPA evaluation criteria; however, it
recommended that Glycerine oleate be added to the National List
regulations, for use in crop production, only until December 31, 2006.
The normal time period for the use of a substance under the NOP
regulations is 5 years, beginning the date the substance appears in the
National List regulations. The NOSB recommended the early expiration
date of December 31, 2006, because of the present efforts of the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reclassify inerts on List 2
(Potentially Toxic Inert Ingredients/High Priority for Testing Inerts)
and List 3 (Inerts of Unknown Toxicity) to either List 1 (Inert
Ingredients of Toxicological Concern) or List 4 (Inerts of Minimal
Concern) by December 31, 2006. With respect to the use of EPA regulated
inert ingredients in organic crop and livestock production, only
substances included on EPA's List 4 are categorically allowed on the
National List (Sec. 205.601(m)(i)); all other EPA inert ingredients
must be listed individually. Glycerine oleate is a List 3 inert; the
NOSB anticipates that EPA will conclude its reclassification of
Glycerine oleate to either a List 1 or List 4 status by December 31,
2006. If Glycerine oleate is reclassified as a List 1 inert, it will be
prohibited for use as an inert ingredient for organic crop production.
If Glycerin oleate is reclassified as a List 4 inert, then it will
automatically continue to be allowed for use in organic crop production
as an inert ingredient. In addition, if EPA does not complete its
reclassification of
[[Page 54662]]
Glycerine oleate by December 31, 2006, the substance will be prohibited
for use in organic crop production beginning on January 1, 2007.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB recommendation regarding the use
of Glycerine oleate in organic crop production, the Secretary accepts
the NOSB recommendation and proposes to amend Sec. 205.601(m)(2) of
the National List regulation as follows:
Glycerine oleate (Glycerol monooleate) (CAS s 25496-72-4;
111-03-5; 37220-82-9)--for use only until December 31, 2006.
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (CAS 97-99-4)--for use only
until December 31, 2006. Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol was petitioned for
use as an inert pesticidal ingredient for use in organic crop
production. Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol is a clear, colorless liquid
that is used extensively in various industries as a high-purity, water
miscible solvent, and as a chemical intermediate. If released to soil,
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol is expected to exhibit high solubility.
Under FIFRA, the EPA has registered Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol as a
List 3 inert (Inerts of Unknown Toxicity). In addition, the FDA has
classified Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol as a direct food additive in
synthetic flavoring substances (21 CFR 172.515) and an indirect food
additive in adhesives and the manufacture of paper and paper adjuvants
(21 CFR 175.105 and 176.210).
The NOSB, at its May 13-14, 2003, meeting in Austin, TX,
recommended adding Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol to Sec. 205.601(m)(2) of
the National List regulations. In this open meeting, the NOSB evaluated
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol against the evaluation criteria of 7 U.S.C.
6517 and 6518 of the OFPA, received public comment, and concluded that
the substance is consistent with the OFPA evaluation criteria; however,
it recommended that Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol be added to the National
List regulations, for use in crop production, only until December 31,
2006.
The normal time period for the use of a substance under the NOP
regulations is five years, beginning the date the substance appears in
the National List regulations. The NOSB recommended the early
expiration date of December 31, 2006, because of the present efforts of
the EPA to reclassify inerts on List 2 (Potentially Toxic Inert
Ingredients/High Priority for Testing inerts) and List 3 (Inerts of
Unkown Toxicity) to either List 1 (Inert Ingredients of Toxicological
Concern) or List 4 (Inerts of Minimal Concern) by December 31, 2006.
With respect to the use of EPA regulated inert ingredients in organic
crop and livestock production, only substances included on EPA's List 4
are categorically allowed on the National List (Sec. 205.601(m)(i));
all other EPA inert ingredients must be listed individually.
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol is a List 3 inert; the NOSB anticipates that
EPA will conclude its reclassification of Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol to
either a List 1 or List 4 status by December 31, 2006. If
Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol is reclassified as a List 1 inert, it will
be prohibited for use as an inert ingredient for organic crop
production. If Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol is reclassified as a List 4
inert, then it will automatically continue to be allowed for use in
organic crop production as an inert ingredient. In addition, if EPA
does not complete its reclassification of Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol by
December 31, 2006, the substance will be prohibited for use in organic
crop production beginning on January 1, 2007.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB recommendation regarding the use
of Tetrahydrofurfurly alcohol in organic crop production, the Secretary
accepts the NOSB recommendation and proposes to amend Sec.
205.601(m)(2) of the National List regulation as follows:
Tetrahydrofurfurly alcohol (CAS 97-99-4)--for use only
until December 31, 2006.
Hydrogen chloride (CAS 7647-01-0)--for de-linting cotton
seed for planting. Hydrogen chloride was petitioned for use as a
synthetic to delint cotton seed for planting in organic crop
production. Hydrogen chloride is a colorless to slightly yellow gas
with a pungent, irritating odor. It is very soluble in water and
readily soluble in alcohol and ether. Hydrogen chloride has been
classified by the FDA as a substance that is GRAS when used as a buffer
and neutralizing agent in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding
practice (21 CFR 582.1057). In delinting cotton seeds intended for
planting organic acreage, Hydrogen chloride is released into a
delinting machine that contains linted cotton seeds. Seed is exposed to
the Hydrogen chloride for about eight to ten minutes to weaken the lint
and is then sent through buffers to remove the weakened lint from the
seed. After delinting, a neutralizing agent (often Calcium carbonate)
is used to prevent acid damage to the seed.
The NOSB, at its April 28-30, 2004, meeting in Chicago, IL,
recommended adding Hydrogen chloride to Sec. 205.601 of the National
List regulations. In this open meeting, the NOSB evaluated Hydrogen
chloride against the evaluation criteria of 7 U.S.C. 6517 and 6518 of
the OFPA, received public comment, and concluded that the substance is
consistent with the OFPA evaluation criteria. Therefore, in response to
the NOSB recommendation regarding the use of Hydrogen chloride in
organic crop production, the Secretary accepts the NOSB recommendation
and proposes to amend Sec. 205.601 of the National List regulations by
adding (1) a new paragraph (n), Seed preparations, and (2) Hydrogen
chloride as follows:
(n) Seed preparations.
Hydrogen chloride (CAS 7647-01-0)--for de-linting cotton
seed for planting.
Ferric phosphate (CAS 10045-86-0). Ferric phosphate was
petitioned for use as a pesticide (molluscicide) to bait slugs and
snails in organic crop production. It is an odorless, yellowish-white
powder that is not very soluble in water. Ferric phosphate is normally
applied to soil as part of a pellet that includes a wheat-based bait to
attract snails and slugs. After the pellets are consumed, Ferric
phosphate interferes with calcium metabolism in the digestive tract of
the snails and slugs, causing them to stop eating. Shortly thereafter,
the snails and slugs die.
Under the FIFRA, the EPA has registered ferric phosphate as a
biochemical molluscicide that targets a wide range of slugs and snails
(63 FR 43936). In assessing risks to human health, EPA has concluded
that there are no known or expected adverse effects to humans from the
use of ferric phosphate. In assessing risks to the environment, the EPA
has concluded that there are no known or expected harmful effects of
the use of Ferric phosphate on the environment if users follow the
application rates and use directions on the label. In addition to the
assessments of the EPA, the FDA has classified Ferric phosphate as a
substance that is GRAS for food use (21 CFR 184.1301).
The NOSB, at its February 28-March 3, 2005, meeting in Washington,
DC, recommended adding Ferric phosphate to Sec. 205.601(h) of the
National List regulations without restriction. In this open meeting,
the NOSB evaluated Ferric phosphate against the evaluation criteria of
7 U.S.C. 6517 and 6518 of the OFPA, received public comment, and
concluded that the substance is consistent with the OFPA evaluation
criteria. Therefore, in response to the NOSB recommendation regarding
the use of Ferric phosphate in organic crop production, the Secretary
accepts the NOSB recommendation and proposes to
[[Page 54663]]
amend Sec. 205.601(h) of the National List regulations as follows:
Ferric phosphate (CAS 10045-86-0).
Section 205.605 Nonagricultural (Nonorganic) Substances Allowed as
Ingredients in or on Processed Products Labeled as ``Organic'' or
``Made With Organic (Specified Ingredients or Food Group(s))''
This proposed rule would amend Sec. 205.605 (a) of the regulations
by adding the following substances:
Egg white lysozyme (CAS 9001-63-2). Egg white lysozyme
was petitioned for use as an enzyme in organic processing. It is a
white powder with no distinct odor. It is readily soluble in water and
practically insoluble in alcohol, chloroform, and ether. Egg white
lysozyme is considered to be GRAS by the FDA for use as an
antimicrobial agent in casings for frankfurters and on cooked meat and
poultry products. Egg white lysozyme is used in casings for
frankfurters at a concentration of 2.5 milligram (mg) lysozyme per
pound (lb) of frankfurter (equivalent to 5.5 mg Lysozyme per kilogram
(kg) of food) and in cooked meat and poultry products sold as ready-to-
eat at a concentration of 2.0 mg of Lysozyme per lb of cooked meat or
poultry product (equivalent to 4.4 mg of Lysozyme per kg of food). The
FDA acknowledged in GRAS Notice No. (GRN) 000064 that it had no
question, at the time of review, that Egg white lysozyme is GRAS under
the intended conditions of use; provided, that the ingredient statement
of food products that contain Egg white lysozyme contain the name ``Egg
white lysozyme'' to identify the source of the protein.
The NOSB, at its May 13-14, 2003, meeting in Austin, TX,
recommended adding Egg white lysozyme to Sec. 205.605(a) of the
National List regulations without restriction. In this open meeting,
the NOSB evaluated Egg white lysozyme against the evaluation criteria
of 7 U.S.C. 6517 and 6518 of the OFPA, received public comment, and
concluded that the substance is consistent with the OFPA evaluation
criteria. Therefore, in response to the NOSB recommendation regarding
the use of Egg white lysozyme in organic handling, the Secretary
accepts the NOSB recommendation and proposes to amend Sec. 205.605(a)
of the National List regulations as follows:
Egg white lysozyme (CAS 9001-63-2).
L-Malic acid (CAS 97-67-6). DL-Malic acid was originally
petitioned for use as a synthetic processing aid in organic handling.
It is a white or colorless powder with no odor. It is readily
biodegradable in water and in soil. DL-Malic acid is considered to be
GRAS by FDA (21 CFR 184.1069). It is a processing aid that is used in
bottled iced tea, dry mix beverages, carbonated beverages, bakery
products, fruit juices, candies, gelatins, desserts, frozen
specialties, sports drinks, and other food products.
The NOSB, at its May 13-14, 2003, meeting in Austin, TX, evaluated
DL-Malic acid in an open meeting, received public comment, and
concluded that the substance was not consistent with the evaluation
criteria of 7 U.S.C. 6517 and 6518 of the OFPA. This determination was
made because of an identified available natural alternative, L-Malic
acid. As a result of having identified a natural alternative to DL-
malic acid, the NOSB asked the petitioner whether L-Malic acid, a
natural, could be substituted for DL-Malic acid for inclusion on the
National List. The petitioner concurred and the NOSB recommended L-
Malic acid for inclusion in section 205.605(a) of the National List.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB recommendation regarding the use of
L-Malic acid in organic handling, the Secretary accepts the NOSB
recommendation and proposes to amend Sec. 205.605 (a) of the National
List regulations as follows:
L-Malic acid (CAS 97-67-6).
Microorganisms--any food grade bacteria, fungi, and other
microorganisms. Seed mold, a microorganism, was petitioned for use as a
processing aid in organic handling. Seed mold is used as a culture
starter in food processing. In the evaluation of seed mold, the NOSB
recognized that they had previously evaluated and determined other
types of food-grade microorganisms (e.g., dairy cultures and yeast) and
certain by-products derived from them (e.g., enzymes) to be consistent
with OFPA criteria and the NOP regulations. These microorganisms are
already included on the National List.
The NOSB acknowledged that there are many species of food-grade
microorganisms that are used in food processing that could be
petitioned for use in organic handling. As a result, a decision was
made by the NOSB to evaluate the categorical use of food-grade
microorganisms in organic handling and recommend their inclusion in
section 205.605(a) of the National List. This decision would obviate
the need for future review and evaluation of other individual food
grade microorganisms that exhibit similar characteristics and functions
as those already approved for use on the National List.
At its May 13-14, 2003, meeting in Austin, TX, the NOSB recommended
adding microorganisms to Sec. 205.605(a) of the National List
regulations without restriction. In this open meeting, the NOSB
evaluated the categorical use of microorganisms in organic handling
against 7 U.S.C. 6517 and 6518 of the OFPA, received public comment,
and concluded that the use of microorganisms in organic handling is
consistent with the evaluation criteria. Therefore, in response to the
NOSB recommendation regarding the use of microorganisms in organic
handling, the Secretary accepts the NOSB recommendation and proposes to
amend Sec. 205.605(a) of the National List regulations as follows:
Microorganisms--any food grade bacteria, fungi, and other
microorganisms.
This proposed rule would also amend Sec. 205.605(b) of the
regulations by adding the following substances:
Activated charcoal (CAS s 7440-44-0; 64365-11-3)--only
from vegetative sources; for use only as a filtering aid in handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ``organic.'' Activated charcoal was petitioned for use
as a processing aid in organic handling. Activated charcoal is a solid,
porous, black carbonaceous material that is used as a decolorizing
agent, taste- and odor-removing agent, and purification agent in food
processing. It is also used for the treatment of water, including
potable water. Activated charcoal is acknowledged by FDA in 21 CFR
173.25(b)(1)(ii) to be an allowed substance for use in ion exchange. It
is also recognized as an indirect food additive in closures with
sealing gaskets for food containers (21 CFR 177.1210).
At its September 17-19, 2002, meeting in Austin, TX, the NOSB
recommended adding activated charcoal to Sec. 205.605(b) of the
National List regulations for organic handling, with the restrictions
that the substance: (1) Comes from vegetative sources only; and (2)
only be used as a filtering aid. In this open meeting, the NOSB
evaluated the use of activated charcoal against the evaluation criteria
of Sec. 205.600(b) of the National List regulations, received public
comment, and concluded that the use of activated charcoal in organic
handling is consistent with the evaluation criteria.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB recommendation regarding the use
of activated charcoal in organic handling,
[[Page 54664]]
the Secretary proposes to amend Sec. 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations to allow activated charcoal as a synthetic ingredient in or
on processed products labeled as ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s))'' as follows:
Activated charcoal (CAS s 7440-44-0; 64365-11-3)--only
from vegetative sources; for use only as a filtering aid in handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ``organic.''
Ammonium hydroxide (CAS 1336-21-6)--for use only as a
boiler water additive until October 21, 2005. Restricted to handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ``organic.'' Ammonium hydroxide was petitioned as a
boiler water additive in organic handling. It is a colorless liquid
with an intense odor. It is used in preventing the corrosion of boiler
equipment used in food processing. Ammonium hydroxide is considered to
be GRAS by FDA and allowed as a boiler water additive under 21 CFR
184.1139.
At its October 15-17, 2001, meeting in Washington, DC, the NOSB
recommended adding Ammonium hydroxide to Sec. 205.605(b) of the
National List regulations, with the restriction that it can only be
used in organic handling until October 21, 2005. In this open meeting,
the NOSB evaluated the use of Ammonium hydroxide against the evaluation
criteria of Sec. 205.600(b) of the National List regulations, received
public comment, and concluded that the use of Ammonium hydroxide in
organic handling is consistent with the evaluation criteria.
Although the NOSB determined Ammonium hydroxide to be consistent
with the evaluation criteria of Sec. 205.600(b), it recommended an
early expiration date of October 21, 2005, for the use of the
substance, to encourage the organic processing industry to find an
alternative substance to use in place of the Ammonium hydroxide. The
normal time period for the use of a substance under the NOP regulations
is 5 years, beginning the date the substance appears in the National
List regulations.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB recommendation regarding the use
of Ammonium hydroxide in organic handling, the Secretary proposes to
amend Sec. 205.605(b) of the National List regulations to allow
Ammonium hydroxide as a synthetic ingredient in or on processed
products labeled as ``made with organic (specified ingredients or food
group(s))'' as follows:
Ammonium hydroxide (CAS 1336-21-6)--for use only as a
boiler water additive until October 21, 2005. Restricted to handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ``organic.''
Cyclohexylamine (CAS 108-91-8)--for use only as a boiler
water additive for packaging sterilization. Restricted to handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ``organic.'' Cyclohexylamine was petitioned as a
boiler water additive in organic handling. Cyclohexylamine is a
colorless to yellow liquid that has a strong, fishy odor. It is
miscible with water and with common organic solvents. It is used to
prevent the corrosion of boiler equipment used in food processing.
Cyclohexylamine is approved for use as a secondary direct food additive
and boiler water additive by FDA under 21 CFR 173.310.
At its October 15-17, 2001, meeting in Washington, DC, the NOSB
recommended adding Cyclohexlamine to Sec. 205.605(b) of the National
List regulations for organic handling, with the restriction that it be
used as a boiler water additive for packaging sterilization only. In
this open meeting, the NOSB evaluated the use of Cyclohexlamine against
the evaluation criteria of Sec. 205.600(b) of the National List
regulations, received public comment, and concluded that the use of
Cyclohexlamine in organic handling is consistent with the evaluation
criteria.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB recommendation regarding the use
of Cyclohexlamine in organic handling, the Secretary proposes to amend
Sec. 205.605(b) of the National List regulations to allow
Cyclohexlamine as a synthetic ingredient in or on processed products
labeled as ``made with organic (specified ingredients or food
group(s))'' as follows:
Cyclohexylamine (CAS 108-91-8)--for use only as a boiler
water additive for packaging sterilization. Restricted to handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ``organic.''
Diethylaminoethanol (CAS 100-37-8)--for use only as a
boiler water additive for packaging sterilization; restricted to
handling agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited for use in handling
agricultural products labeled ``organic.'' Diethlaminoethanol was
petitioned as a boiler water additive in organic handling.
Diethylaminoethanol is a colorless liquid with a weak ammonia odor. It
is hygroscopic soluble in water, alcohol, Acetone, Benzene, and
Petroleum ether. Diethlaminoethanol inhibits corrosion in boiler
chemical systems in return lines, by neutralizing Carbonic acid in
steam and steam condensates, and by scavenging free Oxygen. It is used
in conjunction with Cyclohexylamine, Morpholine, and Octadecylamine.
Diethylaminoethanol is approved for use as a secondary direct food
additive and boiler water additive by FDA under 21 CFR 173.310.
At its May 6-8, 2002, meeting in Austin, TX, the NOSB recommended
adding Diethylaminoethanol to Sec. 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations for organic handling, with the restriction that it be used
as a boiler water additive for packaging sterilization only. In this
open meeting, the NOSB evaluated the use of Diethylaminoethanol against
the evaluation criteria of Sec. 205.600(b) of the National List
regulations, received public comment, and concluded that the use of
Diethylaminoethanol in organic handling is consistent with the
evaluation criteria.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB recommendation regarding the use
of Diethylaminoethanol in organic handling, the Secretary proposes to
amend Sec. 205.605(b) of the National List regulations to allow
Diethylaminoethanol as a synthetic ingredient in or on processed
products labeled as ``made with organic (specified ingredients or food
group(s))'' as follows:
Diethylaminoethanol (CAS 100-37-8)--for use only as a
boiler water additive for packaging sterilization. Restricted to
handling agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited for use in handling
agricultural products labeled ``organic.''
Octadecylamine (CAS 124-30-1)--for use only as a boiler
water additive for packaging sterilization. Restricted to handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited for use in handling
agricultural products labeled ``organic.'' Octadecylamine was
petitioned for use as a boiler water additive to prevent corrosion of
boiler equipment and distribution lines. Octadecylamine is an
[[Page 54665]]
opaque, off-white liquid with ammoniacal odor, insoluble in water but
soluble in alcohol, Ether, Benzene; very soluble in Chloroform; and
miscible in Acetone. Octadecylamine is approved for use as a secondary
direct food additive and boiler water additive by FDA under 21 CFR
173.310.
At its October 15-17, 2001, meeting in Washington, DC, the NOSB
recommended adding Octadecylamine to Sec. 205.605(b) of the National
List regulations for organic handling, with the restriction that it be
used as a boiler water additive for packaging sterilization only. In
this open meeting, the NOSB evaluated the use of Octadecylamine against
the evaluation criteria of Sec. 205.600(b) of the National List
regulations, received public comment, and concluded that the use of
Octadecylamine in organic handling is consistent with the evaluation
criteria.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB recommendation regarding the use
of Octadecylamine in organic handling, the Secretary proposes to amend
Sec. 205.605(b) of the National List regulations to allow
Octadecylamine as a synthetic ingredient in or on processed products
labeled as ``made with organic (specified ingredients or food
group(s))'' as follows:
Octadecylamine (CAS 124-30-1)--for use only as a boiler
water additive for packaging sterilization. Restricted to handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited for use in handling
agricultural products labeled ``organic.''
Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid (CAS 79-21-0)--for use
in wash and/or rinse water according to FDA limitations. For use as a
sanitizer on food contact surfaces. Restricted to use in handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in agricultural products
labeled ``organic.'' Peracetic acid was petitioned as an anti-microbial
water treatment additive and/or as an equipment sanitizer or
disinfectant. Its most common use in food processing and handling is as
a sanitizer for food contact surfaces and as a disinfectant for fruits,
vegetables, meats, and eggs. Other uses of Peracetic acid include
removing deposits, suppressing odor, and stripping biofilms from food
contact surfaces. Peracetic acid is a clear colorless liquid with no
foaming capability, and has a strong pungent odor. It is approved by
FDA as a secondary direct food additive used in the washing or peeling
of fruits and vegetables (21 CFR 173.315). It is also approved for use
as an indirect food additive, sanitizer, under 21 CFR 178.1010.
At its November 15-17, 2000, meeting in Washington, DC, the NOSB
recommended adding Peracetic acid to Sec. 205.605(b) of the National
List regulations for organic handling, with the restrictions that it be
allowed: (1) For direct food contact only in wash and/or rinse water;
and (2) as a sanitizer on surfaces in contact with organic food. In
this open meeting, the NOSB evaluated the use of Peracetic acid against
the evaluation criteria of Sec. 205.600(b) of the National List
regulations, received public comment, and concluded that the use of
Peracetic acid in organic handling is consistent with the evaluation
criteria.
In accepting the NOSB recommendation to allow Peracetic acid in
organic handling, this proposed rule proposes language for including
Peracetic acid on the National List that differs from the original NOSB
recommendation. The original wording of the NOSB recommendation
submitted to the Secretary was as follows: ``Peracetic acid--for direct
food contact only in wash and/or rinse water, as a sanitizer on
surfaces in contact with organic food.'' The NOP did not elect to use
that language because of the confusion the language could cause when
referencing the use of Peracetic acid (Peroxyacetic acid) against FDA
regulations.
For instance, the recommended NOSB language references ``Peracetic
acid'' as the common name of the substance, but FDA regulations
reference ``Peroxyacetic acid,'' in 21 CFR 173.315, for the washing or
peeling of fruits and vegetables. Also, FDA regulations restrict the
use of Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid on fruits and vegetables that
are not raw agricultural commodities. Based on this information, the
NOP determined that the original NOSB recommendation could cause
handlers that use Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid to believe that the
substance could be used on all agricultural products. As a result, this
proposed rule attempts to limit confusion regarding the proposed use of
Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid in the handling of ``made with * * *''
products by including language that acknowledges the FDA use
limitations.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB recommendation regarding the use
of Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid in organic handling, the Secretary
proposes to amend Sec. 205.605(b) of the National List regulations to
allow Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid as a synthetic ingredient in or
on processed products labeled as ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s))'' as follows:
Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid (CAS 79-21-0)--for use
in wash and/or rinse water according to FDA limitations. For use as a
sanitizer on food contact surfaces. Restricted to use in handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ``organic.''
Sodium acid pyrophosphate (CAS 7758-16-9)--for use only
as a leavening agent in agricultural products labeled ``made with
organic (specified ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in
handling agricultural products labeled ``organic.'' Sodium acid
pyrophosphate was petitioned for use as a leavening agent in baked
goods. It helps to control the release of Carbon dioxide that leavens
baked goods. It can be either anhydrous or contain one or more
molecules of water of hydration. The anhydrous forms are white,
crystalline powders or granules. The hydrated forms occur as white or
transparent crystals or granules. When used in accordance with good
manufacturing practices, Sodium acid pyrophosphate is considered to be
GRAS by FDA under 21 CFR 182.1087.
At its May 13-14, 2003, meeting in Austin, TX, the NOSB recommended
adding Sodium acid pyrophosphate to Sec. 205.605(b) of the National
List regulations for organic handling, with the restriction that it
only be used as a leavening agent. In this open meeting, the NOSB
evaluated Sodium acid pyrophosphate against the evaluation criteria of
Sec. 205.600(b) of the National List regulations, received public
comment, and concluded that the use of Sodium acid pyrophosphate in
organic handling is consistent with the evaluation criteria.
Therefore, in response to the NOSB recommendation regarding the use
of Sodium acid pyrophosphate in organic handling, the Secretary
proposes to amend Sec. 205.605(b) of the National List regulations to
allow Sodium acid pyrophosphate as a synthetic ingredient in or on
processed products labeled as ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s))'' as follows:
Sodium acid pyrophosphate (CAS 7758-16-9)--for use only
as a leavening agent in agricultural products labeled ``made with
organic (specified ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in
handling agricultural products labeled ``organic.''
Tetrasodium pyrophosphate (CAS 7722-88-5)--for use only
in meat analog products labeled ``made with
[[Page 54666]]
organic (specified ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in
handling agricultural products labeled ``organic.'' In a proposed rule,
published May 22, 2003 (68 FR 27941), Sec. 205.605(b) of the
regulations was proposed to be amended by adding Tetrasodium
pyrophosphate to be used only in textured meat analog products. In
response to the proposal to add Tetrasodium pyrophospate on the
National List regulations, we received six public comments, three in
favor of and three opposed to its inclusion. Regarding the comments
that opposed the inclusion of Tetrasodium pyrophosphate on the National
List regulations, commenters expressed concern that the recommended
annotation was vague, confusing, undefined and needed clarification.
They stated that the primary use of Tetrasodium pyrophosphate, as
proposed, appeared to be to create texture that is similar to a meat
product. They also asserted that such a use would be in direct conflict
with the criterion in Sec. 205.600(b)(4) of the regulations that
emphasizes ``the substance's primary use is not as a preservative or to
recreate or improve flavors, colors, textures, or nutritive value lost
during processing, except where the replacement of nutrients is
required by law.''
Due to the merit of those comments, on March 3, 2003 (68 FR 62215),
we did not add Tetrasodium pyrophosphate on the National List and
referred the substance back to the NOSB for further deliberation as to
whether the proposed use of Tetrasodium pyrophosphate conflicts with
Sec. 205.600 (b)(4) of the NOP regulations. Through further review and
deliberation at their April 2004 meeting in Chicago, IL, the NOSB
determined that the proposed use of Tetrasodium pyrophosphate did not
conflict with Sec. 205.600 (b)(4) of the NOP regulations. In response
to the concerns of the commenters, the NOSB provided that the primary
use of Tetrasodium pyrophosphate, as petitioned, is not to serve as a
preservative, or to ``recreate'' flavor, color or texture. They
acknowledged that the substance may be used to create texture; however,
it is not being used to ``recreate'' texture, as is referenced in Sec.
205.600 (b)(4) of the regulations. Rather, it is being proposed to add
Tetrasodium pyrophosphate to Sec. 205.605(b) of the National List
regulations as follows:
Tetrasodium pyrophosphate (CAS 7722-88-5)--for use only
in meat analog products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ``organic.''
Section 205.681 Appeals
This proposed rule would amend Sec. 205.681(d)(1) of the
regulations by updating the mailing address for where to file a
Certification or Accreditation appeal as follows:
Administrator, USDA, AMS, c/o NOP Appeals Staff, Stop 0203, Room
3529-S, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-0203.
III. Related Documents
Seven notices were published regarding the meetings of the NOSB and
its deliberations on recommendations and substances petitioned for
amending the National List. Substances and recommendations included in
this proposed rule were announced for NOSB deliberation in the
following Federal Register Notices: (1) 65 FR 64657, October 30, 2000,
(Peracetic acid); (2) 66 FR 48654, September 21, 2001, (Ammonium
hydroxide, Cyclohexlamine, and Octadecylamine); (3) 67 FR 19375, April
19, 2002, (Diethylaminoethanol); (4) 67 FR 54784, August 26, 2002,
(Activated charcoal); (5) 68 FR 23277, May 1, 2003, (Egg white
lysozyme, Glycerine oleate, L-Malic acid, Microorganisms, Sodium acid
pyrophosphate and Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol); (6) 69 FR 18036, April
6, 2004, (Hydrogen Chloride, and Tetrasodium pyrophosphate); and (7) 70
FR 7224, February 11, 2005, (Ferric phosphate).
IV. Statutory and Regulatory Authority
The OFPA, as amended (7 U.S.C. 6501 et seq.), authorizes the
Secretary to make amendments to the National List based on proposed
amendments developed by the NOSB. Sections 6518(k)(2) and 6518(n) of
OFPA authorizes the NOSB to develop proposed amendments to the National
List for submission to the Secretary and establishes a petition process
by which persons may petition the NOSB for the purpose of having
substances evaluated for inclusion on or deletion from the National
List, respectively. The National List petition process is implemented
under Sec. 205.607 of the NOP regulations. The current petition
process (65 FR 43259) can be accessed through the NOP Web site at
https://www.ams.usda.gov/nop.
A. Executive Order 12866
This action has been determined to be non-significant for purposes
of Executive Order 12866, and therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
B. Executive Order 12988
Executive Order 12988 instructs each executive agency to adhere to
certain requirements in the development of new and revised regulations
in order to avoid unduly burdening the court system. This proposed rule
is not intended to have a retroactive effect.
States and local jurisdictions are preempted under section 2115 of
the OFPA (7 U.S.C. 6514) from creating programs of accreditation for
private persons or State officials who want to become certifying agents
of organic farms or handling operations. A governing State official
would have to apply to USDA to be accredited as a certifying agent, as
described in section 2115(b) of the OFPA (7 U.S.C. 6514(b)). States are
also preempted under sections 2104 through 2108 of the OFPA (7 U.S.C.
6503 through 6507) from creating certification programs to certify
organic farms or handling operations unless the State programs have
been submitted to, and approved by, the Secretary as meeting the
requirements of the OFPA.
Pursuant to section 2108(b)(2) of the OFPA (7 U.S.C. 6507(b)(2)), a
State organic certification program may contain additional requirements
for the production and handling of organically produced agricultural
products that are produced in the State and for the certification of
organic farm and handling operations located within the State under
certain circumstances. Such additional requirements must: (a) Further
the purposes of the OFPA, (b) not be inconsistent with the OFPA, (c)
not be discriminatory toward agricultural commodities organically
produced in other States, and (d) not be effective until approved by
the Secretary.
Pursuant to section 2120(f) of the OFPA (7 U.S.C. 6519 (f)), this
proposed rule would not alter the authority of the Secretary under the
Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Poultry
Products Inspections Act (21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.), or the Egg Products
Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1031 et seq.), concerning meat, poultry, and
egg products, nor any of the authorities of the Secretary of Health and
Human Services under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
301 et seq.), nor the authority of the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.).
Section 2121 of the OFPA (7 U.S.C. 6520) provides for the Secretary
to establish an expedited administrative appeals procedure under which
persons
[[Page 54667]]
may appeal an action of the Secretary, the applicable governing State
official, or a certifying agent under this title that adversely affects
such person or is inconsistent with the organic certification program
established under this title. The OFPA also provides that the U.S.
District Court for the district in which a person is located has
jurisdiction to review the Secretary's decision.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
requires agencies to consider the economic impact of each rule on small
entities and evaluate alternatives that would accomplish the objectives
of the rule without unduly burdening small entities or erecting
barriers that would restrict their ability to compete in the market.
The purpose is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses
subject to the action. Section 605 of the RFA allows an agency to
certify a rule, in lieu of preparing an analysis, if the rulemaking is
not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the RFA, the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) performed an economic impact analysis on small
entities in the final rule published in the Federal Register on
December 21, 2000 (65 FR 80548). The AMS has also considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. The impact on
entities affected by this proposed rule would not be significant. The
effect of this proposed rule would be to allow the use of additional
substances in agricultural production and handling. This action would
relax the regulations published in the final rule and would provide
small entities with more tools to use in day-to-day operations. The AMS
concludes that the economic impact of this addition of allowed
substances, if any, would be minimal and entirely beneficial to small
agricultural service firms. Accordingly, USDA certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
Small agricultural service firms, which include producers,
handlers, and accredited certifying agents, have been defined by the
Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as those having
annual receipts of less than $6,000,000 and small agricultural
producers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000. This proposed rule would have an impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
The U.S. organic industry at the end of 2001 included nearly 6,600
certified crop and livestock operations, including organic production
and handling operations, producers, and handlers. These operations
reported certified acreage totaling more than 2.34 million acres,
72,209 certified livestock, and 5.01 million certified poultry. Data on
the numbers of certified handling operations are not yet available, but
likely number in the thousands, as they would include any operation
that transforms raw product into processed products using organic
ingredients. Growth in the U.S. organic industry has been significant
at all levels. From 1997 to 2001, the total organic acreage grew by 74
percent; livestock numbers certified organic grew by almost 300 percent
over the same period, and poultry certified organic increased by 2,118
percent over this time. Sales growth of organic products has been
equally significant, growing on average around 20 percent per year.
Sales of organic products were approximately $1 billion in 1993, but
reached $15 billion in 2004. In addition, USDA has accredited 97
certifying agents who have applied to USDA to be accredited in order to
provide certification services to producers and handlers. A complete
list of names and addresses of accredited certifying agents may be
found on the AMS NOP Web site, at https://www.ams.usda.gov/nop. AMS
believes that most of these entities would be considered small entities
under the criteria established by the SBA.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et
seq., the existing information collection requirements for the NOP are
approved under OMB number 0581-0191. No additional collection or
recordkeeping requirements are imposed on the public by this proposed
rule. Accordingly, OMB clearance is not required by section 350(h) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act, or OMB's implementing regulation at 5 CFR
part 1320.
E. General Notice of Public Rulemaking
This proposed rule reflects recommendations submitted to the
Secretary by the NOSB and includes an amendment to the mailing address
for where to file a Certification or Accreditation Appeal. The seven
substances proposed to be added to the National List were based on
petitions from the industry. The NOSB evaluated each petition using
criteria in the OFPA. Because these substances are critical to organic
production and handling operations, producers and handlers should be
able to use them in their operations as soon as possible. A 60-day
period for interested persons to comment on this rule is provided.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 205
Administrative practice and procedure, Agriculture, Animals,
Archives and records, Imports, Labeling, Organically produced products,
Plants, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Seals and insignia,
Soil conservation.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 205, Subpart
G is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 205--NATIONAL ORGANIC PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 205 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6501-6522.
2. Section 205.601 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (h).
b. Revising paragraph (m)(2).
c. Adding a new paragraph (n).
d. Reserving paragraphs (o)-(z).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 205.601 Synthetic substance allowed for use in organic crop
production.
* * * * *
(h) As slug or snail bait. Ferric phosphate (CAS 10045-
86-0).
* * * * *
(m) * * *
(2) EPA List 3--Inerts of Unknown Toxicity allowed:
(i) Glycerine Oleate (Glycerol monooleate) (CAS s 25496-
72-4; 111-03-5; 37220-82-9)--for use only until December 31, 2006.
(ii) Inerts used in passive pheromone dispensers.
(iii) Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (CAS 97-99-4)--for use
only until December 31, 2006.
(n) Seed preparations. Hydrogen chloride (CAS 7647-01-
0)--for delinting cotton seed for planting.
* * * * *
3. Section 205.605 is amended by:
a. Adding three materials to paragraph (a).
b. Adding 8 new substances to paragraph (b).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 205.605 Nonagricultural (nonorganic) substances allowed as
ingredients in or on processed products labeled as ``organic'' or
``made with organic (specified ingredients or food group(s)).''
* * * * *
(a) * * *
* * * * *
[[Page 54668]]
Egg white lysozyme (CAS 9001-63-2)
* * * * *
L-Malic acid (CAS 97-67-6).
* * * * *
Microorganisms--any food grade bacteria, fungi, and other
microorganism.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Activated charcoal (CAS s 7440-44-0; 64365-11-3)--only
from vegetative sources; for use only as a filtering aid in handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ``organic.''
* * * * *
Ammonium hydroxide (CAS 1336-21-6)--for use only as a
boiler water additive until October 21, 2005. Restricted to handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ``organic.''
* * * * *
Cyclohexylamine (CAS 108-91-8)--for use only as a boiler
water additive for packaging sterilization. Restricted to handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ``organic.''
Diethylaminoethanol (CAS 100-37-8)--for use only as a
boiler water additive for packaging sterilization. Restricted to
handling agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited for use in handling
agricultural products labeled ``organic.''
* * * * *
Octadecylamine (CAS 124-30-1)--for use only as a boiler
water additive for packaging sterilization. Restricted to handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited for use in handling
agricultural products labeled ``organic.''
* * * * *
Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid (CAS 79-21-0)--for use
in wash and/or rinse water according to FDA limitations. For use as a
sanitizer on food contact surfaces. Restricted to use in handling
agricultural products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ``organic.''
* * * * *
Sodium acid pyrophosphate (CAS 7758-16-9)--for use only
as a leavening agent in agricultural products labeled ``made with
organic (specified ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in
handling agricultural products labeled ``organic.''
* * * * *
Tetrasodium pyrophosphate (CAS 7722-88-5)--for use only
in meat analog products labeled ``made with organic (specified
ingredients or food group(s));'' prohibited in handling agricultural
products labeled ``organic.''
* * * * *
4. In Sec. 205.681, paragraph (d)(1) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 205.681 Appeals.
* * * * *
(d) * * * (1) Appeals to the Administrator must be filed in writing
and addressed to: Administrator, USDA, AMS, c/o NOP Appeals Staff, Stop
0203, Room 3529-S, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-
0203
* * * * *
Dated: September 12, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-18381 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P