New Passport Amendment Policy, 53922-53925 [05-18108]
Download as PDF
53922
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
and Reporting Points, dated August 30,
2004, and effective September 16, 2004,
which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designation listed in this document will
be published subsequently in the Order.
The Rule
This amendment to 14 CFR part 71
revises Class E airspace at Cordova,
Alaska. This Class E airspace is revised
to accommodate aircraft executing
SIAPs at the airport and will be
depicted on aeronautical charts for pilot
reference. The intended effect of this
rule is to provide adequate controlled
airspace for Instrument Flight Rule (IFR)
operations at Cordova Airport, Cordova,
Alaska.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. It, therefore—(1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle 1, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section
40103, Sovereignty and use of airspace.
Under that section, the FAA is charged
with prescribing regulations to ensure
the safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace. This regulation is
within the scope of that authority
because it creates Class E airspace
sufficient in size to contain aircraft
executing instrument procedures for the
Cordova Airport and represents the
FAA’s continuing effort to safely and
efficiently use the navigable airspace.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:30 Sep 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
I
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS;
AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING
POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet
above the surface within a 30-mile radius of
the airport and within 6 miles each side of
the 115° bearing from the Glacier River NDB
extending from the 30-mile radius to 45 miles
east of the airport, excluding that airspace
within Control Area 1487L. and more than 12
miles from the shoreline.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Anchorage, AK, on September 1,
2005.
Joseph Rollins,
Acting Director, Alaska Flight Services Area
Office.
[FR Doc. 05–18154 Filed 9–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9M,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 30, 2004, and
effective September 16, 2004, is
amended as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace
Designated as Surface Areas.
AGENCY:
I
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet or more above the
surface of the earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AAL AK E5 Cordova, AK [Revised]
Cordova, Merle K. (Mudhole) Smith Airport,
AK
(Lat. 60°29′31″ N., long. 145°28′40″ W.)
Glacier River NDB
(Lat. 60°29′56″ N., long. 145°28′28″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile
radius of the Merle K. (Mudhole) Smith
Airport, and within 4 miles each side of the
222° bearing from the Glacier River NDB
extending from the 6.6-mile radius to 20
miles southwest of the airport; and that
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RIN 1400–AC11
[Public Notice: 5186]
New Passport Amendment Policy
ACTION:
AAL AK E2 Cordova, AK [Revised]
Cordova, Merle K. (Mudhole) Smith Airport,
AK
(Lat. 60°29′31″ N., Long. 145°28′40″ W.)
Glacier River Non-Directional Beacon (NDB)
(Lat. 60°29′56″ N., Long. 145°28′28″ W.)
Within a 4.1–mile radius of the Merle K.
(Mudhole) Smith Airport and within 2 miles
each side of the 115° bearing from the Glacier
River NDB extending from the 4.1–mile
radius to 6 miles southeast of the airport, and
within 2 miles each side of the 124° bearing
from the Glacier River NDB extending from
the 4.1–mile radius to 10.4 miles southeast of
the airport, and within 3.2 miles northwest
and 2.1 miles southeast of the 222° bearing
from the Glacier River NDB extending from
the 4.1–mile radius to 10 miles southwest of
the airport, excluding that airspace north of
a line from Lat. 60°31′03″ N., Long.
145°20′59″ W. to Lat. 60°32′45″ N., Long.
145°33′43″ W.
*
22 CFR Part 51
Department of State.
Final rule.
SUMMARY: This rule amends the passport
regulations to abolish the U.S. passport
amendment process, except for the
convenience of the U.S. Government,
and broadens the reasons for issuing a
replacement passport at no additional
cost to the applicant. The rule also adds
unpaid fees as a ground for invalidating
a passport.
DATES: This rule will become effective
on September 26, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon Palmer-Royston, Office of
Passport Policy, Planning and Advisory
Services, Bureau of Consular Affairs,
telephone 202–663–2662.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Analysis of Comments
The proposed rule was published on
February 18, 2005. Comments were
accepted from the public for 45 days.
We received only 2 comments in
response to the portion of the proposed
rule that we are now publishing in final.
Neither comment objected to the
proposed change in the amendment
process. Rather, both comments asked
for greater detail as to how the new
procedures will work. The process is
discussed below. The comments are
available for review at https://
www.travel.state.gov, under the passport
section, or at the State Department
reading room.
Rule Change
This rule was originally published in
the Federal Register on February 18,
E:\FR\FM\13SER1.SGM
13SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
2005 (70 FR 8305), as a proposed rule
entitled ‘‘Electronic Passport’’ (RIN
1400–AB93) that included changes to
the passport regulations needed due to
the pending introduction of the
electronic passport. This final rule
separates the portions of the proposed
regulation on passport amendments,
replacement passports and unpaid fees
from the portions of the proposed
regulation that related exclusively to
electronic passports. We separated them
because a large volume of comments
were received with respect to the
introduction of the sections of the rule
relating exclusively to the electronic
passport, which the Department needs
time to consider carefully. We do not
believe, however, that there is any need
to delay making the changes in passport
amendment policy and the rules for
invalidation of a passport planned in
the proposed rule. In addition to
deleting the portions of the proposed
regulations relating exclusively to the
electronic passport, the final rule
includes a few minor changes in
wording, but does not alter the
substance of the proposed rule.
Regulatory Changes
Passport Amendments and Extensions
Discontinued
By this rule, the Department
discontinues the general practice of
amending passports to correct or change
data elements relating to the bearer or to
the passport’s validity period. This will
improve document security by
presenting all personal information only
on one page, the passport data page.
Moreover, in the future, the Department
plans to issue U.S. passports with an
electronic chip as an additional security
feature. Once programmed, the chip
cannot be edited. In order to protect the
security of the electronic passport, the
passport data page and the electronic
chip would contain the same
information.
Under this rule, when important
information contained on the data page
of a passport, for example, the bearer’s
name or the passport validity period, is
changed, instead of manually amending
the passport to reflect the new
information, the Department will cancel
the passport and issue a replacement.
Issuance of a replacement will mean
that the data page will reflect the correct
personal information of the passport
bearer and the correct validity period,
and, in the case of an electronic
passport, that the information will be
identical to the information on the
electronic chip. However, the rule
reserves the possibility of amending a
passport for the convenience of the U.S.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:30 Sep 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
53923
Government in a small number of cases
where it would be impossible or
inadvisable to issue a replacement, such
as when a passport must be limited in
validity for direct return to the United
States.
provides that those who have been
issued a one-year validity passport for
emergency travel may apply for a fullvalidity replacement passport within
one year of the issuance of the limited
passport for no additional cost.
Application for Replacement Passport
Pursuant to Title 22 of the United
States Code, Section 211a et seq. and
E.O. 11295, 31 FR 10603 (Aug. 5, 1966),
the Secretary has broad authority to
issue regulations governing the issuance
of passports. There is no statutory
requirement to permit amendments to
passports, as opposed to requiring that
a new passport be issued when
personal, or other, information changes.
The Secretary has in the past exercised
regulatory discretion to permit
amendments. The current regulations in
Section 51.20 of Title 22, Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) requires that
an application for a passport or for an
amendment of a passport shall be
completed upon such forms as
prescribed by the Department. An
applicant for a passport amendment
uses a specified application form. This
rule will delete, in the first sentence of
section 51.20, the words ‘‘an
amendment,’’ to reflect the decision to
discontinue amendments.
Section 51.64 of Title 22, CFR sets out
the requirements for replacement of a
passport at no cost. This rule will add
new categories of such passports. The
Department encourages U.S. citizens to
keep their U.S. passports up to date as
a document of identity. Doing so will
help prevent unexpected problems that
may occur when the identity shown on
their passport does not match other
identity materials. To encourage
individuals to maintain passports that
accurately reflect their current names
and to alleviate some of the cost burden,
an individual whose name has changed,
as for example, through marriage or by
court order, within the first year of
validity of a new passport will be able
to return the passport, along with a
completed application, new
photographs and proof of the personal
information change for replacement
with a full validity passport at no
additional cost. This rule will also allow
issuance at no cost of a replacement
passport, for the balance of its period of
validity, of a passport needed by law
enforcement or the judiciary for
evidentiary purposes.
Nearly all passports applied for
abroad, except limited validity
emergency passports, are printed in the
United States. Applicants for limited
validity emergency passports must pay
the fees that are charged for a fullvalidity passport. This amendment
New Ground for Invalidating a Passport
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Under this rule, if full payment of all
applicable passport fees is not
presented, as for example when a check
is returned or a credit card charge is
disputed after issuance of a passport,
the Department, in addition to taking
action to collect the delinquent fees
under 22 CFR part 34 and the Federal
Claims Collection Act, may send the
delinquent bearer a letter to the bearer’s
last available address notifying him or
her that the passport has been
invalidated because the applicable fees
have not been received. An invalidated
passport cannot be used for travel.
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is publishing this
rule as a final rule, after publishing a
proposed rule, allowing a 45-day
provision for public comments, and
consideration of all comments received.
The Department provided for a shorter
comment period than the 60 days
suggested by Section 6(a) of E.O. 12866
because we believed 45 days would
provide the public with a meaningful
opportunity to comment while
advancing important national security
and foreign policy goals. In order to
protect the security of U.S. borders, it is
essential that the Department put the no
amendment policy into effect as soon as
possible.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive
Order 13272: Small Business
These final regulations are hereby
certified as not expected to have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
5 U.S.C. 601–612, and Executive Order
13272, section 3(b).
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This final rule is not a major rule, as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for purposes of
congressional review of agency
rulemaking under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, Public Law 104–121. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United
States-based companies to compete with
E:\FR\FM\13SER1.SGM
13SER1
53924
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
foreign based companies in domestic
and export markets.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UFMA),
Public Law 104–4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C.
1532, generally requires agencies to
prepare a statement before proposing
any rule that may result in an annual
expenditure of $100 million or more by
State, local, or tribal governments, or by
the private sector. This rule will not
result in any such expenditure nor will
it significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132:
Federalism
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor will the rule
have federalism implications warranting
the application of Executive Orders No.
12372 and No. 13132.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Review
The Department of State has reviewed
this final rule to ensure its consistency
with the regulatory philosophy and
principles set forth in Executive Order
12866 and has determined that the
benefits of the proposed regulation
justify its costs. The Department does
not consider the proposed rule to be an
economically significant regulatory
action within the scope of section 3(f)(1)
of the Executive Order since it is not
likely to have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or to
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities. However, because the
proposed rule from which this final rule
is derived does have important policy
implications and involves a critical
component of upgrading border security
for the United States, this final rule has
been provided to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
The Department has reviewed the
regulations in light of sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:30 Sep 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In conjunction with the proposed
rule, the Department determined that
the portion of the proposed rule
contained in this final rule contains
collection of information requirements
for the purposes of the PRA. The
Department sought and received
emergency six-month approvals from
OMB for the use of four information
collections. The Department is currently
seeking three-year extensions of the
OMB emergency approvals. The
extensions are the subject of separate
Federal Register notices and requests
for public comment.
Two of the four collections involve
existing forms that were already
scheduled for PRA renewal in 2005. The
Department has revised and updated the
instructions associated with existing
information collections number 1405–
0004 (DS–11, Application for a U.S.
Passport) and 1405–0020 (DS–82,
Application for a U.S. Passport by Mail).
Among other changes, the revisions
notify applicants that a passport may be
invalidated for lack of payment of the
requisite fees.
The Department is also introducing
two new collections of information. One
of the new collections will introduce a
new form, DS–5504 (U.S. Passport ReApplication Form), to permit
application for a replacement fullvalidity passport within one year of
passport issuance based on a change of
name, incorrect data, or the emergency
issuance abroad of a one-year full-fee
passport. The other new collection (DS–
4085, Application for Additional Visa
Pages) will replace existing information
collection number 1405–0007, which
relates to Form DS–19. Form DS–19 is
currently used to apply for amendment
of a U.S. passport or request issuance of
extra visa pages. Because passport
amendments no longer will be made
under the proposed rule, Form DS–19
will be discontinued. In its place, Form
DS–4085 will be introduced solely to
enable holders of a valid U.S. passport
to request that extra visa pages be added
to the passport.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 51
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Passports and visas.
I Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, 22 CFR Chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 51—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 51
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 211a, 213, 2651a,
2671(d)(3), 2714 and 3926; 31 U.S.C. 9701;
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E.O. 11295, 3 CFR, 1966–1970 Comp., p 570;
sec. 236, Public Law 106–113, 113 Stat.
1501A–430; 18 U.S.C. 1621(a)(2).
2. Section 51.4 is amended by revising
paragraph (f) and adding paragraph
(h)(3) to read as follows:
I
§ 51.4
Validity of passports.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Limitation of validity. The
Secretary may limit a passport’s validity
period to less than the normal validity
period. The bearer of a limited passport
may apply for a replacement passport,
using the proper application, and
submitting the limited passport,
applicable fees, photos and additional
documentation, if required, to support
the issuance of a replacement passport.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(3) The Department has sent a written
notice to the bearer at the bearer’s last
known address that the passport has
been invalidated because the
Department has not received the
applicable fees.
*
*
*
*
*
I 3–4. The first sentence of § 51.20 is
revised to read as follows:
§ 51.20
General.
An application for a passport, a
replacement passport, extra visa pages,
or other passport related service must be
completed upon such forms as the
Department may prescribe.
*
*
*
*
*
I 5. Section 51.32 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 51.32
Passport Amendments.
Except for the convenience of the U.S.
Government, no passport will be
amended.
I 6. Section 51.64 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 51.64
Replacement Passports.
A passport issuing office may issue a
replacement passport for the following
reasons without payment of applicable
fees:
(a) To correct an error or rectify a
mistake of the Department.
(b) When the bearer has changed his
or her name or other personal identifier
listed on the data page of the passport,
and applies for a replacement passport
within one year of the date of the
passport’s original issuance.
(c) When the bearer of an emergency
full fee passport issued for a limited
validity period applies for a full validity
passport within one year of the date of
the passport’s original issuance.
(d) When a passport is retained by law
enforcement or the judiciary for
E:\FR\FM\13SER1.SGM
13SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
evidentiary purposes and the bearer is
still eligible to have a passport.
I 7. Section 51.66(a) is revised to read
as follows:
§ 51.66
Expedited passport processing.
(a) Within the United States, an
applicant for a passport service
(including issuance, replacement or the
addition of visa pages) may request
expedited processing by a Passport
Agency. All requests by applicants for
in-person services at a Passport Agency
shall be considered requests for
expedited processing, unless the
Department has determined that the
applicant is required to apply at a
Passport Agency.
*
*
*
*
*
I 8. The title of part 51, subpart E is
revised to read as follows:
Subpart E—Limitations on Issuance or
Use of Passports
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 6, 2005.
Maura Harty,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05–18108 Filed 9–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
29 CFR Part 1910
[Docket No. S–023A]
RIN 1218–AC08
Updating OSHA Standards Based On
National Consensus Standards;
General, Incorporation by Reference;
Hazardous Materials, Flammable and
Combustible Liquids; General
Environmental Controls, Temporary
Labor Camps; Hand and Portable
Powered Tools and Other Hand-Held
Equipment, Guarding of Portable
Powered Tools; Welding, Cutting and
Brazing, Arc Welding and Cutting;
Special Industries, Sawmills
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA); Labor.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: OSHA is issuing this final
rule to delete from OSHA standards
three references to national consensus
standards and two references to
industry standards that are outdated.
Deleting these references will not
reduce employee protections. By
eliminating the outdated references,
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:30 Sep 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
however, OSHA will clarify employer
obligations under the applicable OSHA
standards and reduce administrative
burdens on employers and OSHA.
These revisions are part of OSHA’s
overall effort to update OSHA standards
that reference, or that include language
taken directly from, outdated consensus
standards.
DATES: This final rule will become
effective on November 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: In accordance with 28
U.S.C. 2112(a), the Agency designates
the Associate Solicitor of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, Office
of the Solicitor of Labor, Room S–4004,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210, to receive petitions for
review of the final rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information and press inquiries
contact Mr. Kevin Ropp, Director,
OSHA Office of Communications, Room
N–3647, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693–1999.
For technical inquiries contact Mr. Lee
Smith, Director, Office of Safety
Systems, Room N–3609, OSHA, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone: (202) 693–2255 or fax (202)
693–1663. Copies of this Federal
Register notice are available from the
OSHA Office of Publications, Room N–
3101, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693–1888.
Electronic copies of this Federal
Register notice, as well as news releases
and other relevant documents, are
available at OSHA’s Web page at https://
www.osha.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: References
to comments in the rulemaking record
are found throughout the text of the
preamble. Comments are identified by
an assigned exhibit number as follows:
‘‘Ex. 4–3’’ means Exhibit 4–3 in Docket
S–023A. A list of the exhibits and
copies of the exhibits are available in
the OSHA Docket Office under Docket
S–023A and at OSHA’s homepage.
Background
On November 24, 2004, OSHA
published a notice in the Federal
Register announcing its overall project
to update OSHA standards that are
based on national consensus standards
(69 FR 68283). The notice explained the
reasons for the project and the
regulatory approaches OSHA plans to
use to implement the project, including
notice and comment rulemaking, direct
final rulemaking, and technical
amendments. To review the eleven
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53925
comments received on this notice, most
of which were supportive, see Docket S–
023 at https://dockets.osha.gov. OSHA
appreciates these comments and will
welcome additional comments as it
proceeds with the overall update
project.
On the same day, OSHA also
published in the Federal Register a
direct final rule (69 FR 68712) and a
companion proposed rule (69 FR 68706)
to delete three references to national
consensus standards and two references
to industry standards that are outdated.
OSHA announced that the direct final
rule would become effective on
February 22, 2005, unless the Agency
received a significant adverse comment
before the comment period closed.
OSHA received five comments on the
direct final rule and companion
proposed rule. OSHA considers one of
the comments to be significantly
adverse. On February 18, 2005, OSHA
published a notice withdrawing the
direct final rule (70 FR 8291). OSHA is
treating the five comments as comments
to the proposed rule, and considered all
of the comments in publishing this final
rule.
Discussion of Changes
OSHA explained in detail its decision
to revoke each of the references at issue
in the direct final and companion
proposed rules published in the Federal
Register on November 24, 2004 (69 FR
68706, 68712), and OSHA incorporates
those discussions in this final rule. The
five references are to consensus or
industry standards issued over 35 years
ago, and in one case over 60 years ago.
Some are no longer available to the
public through the issuing Standards
Development Organization (SDO). Three
of the references have been withdrawn
by their issuing SDOs and not replaced.
In proposing the revocations, OSHA
found that the changes would enhance
employee safety by eliminating
confusion and clarifying employer
obligations. OSHA also determined that
the revocations would not result in
additional costs to employers, and may
even produce cost savings.
The Agency carefully considered all
comments received. After review of the
comments, OSHA continues to find that
revoking the five references is
appropriate.
29 CFR 1910.106(b)(1)(iii)(a)(2):
OSHA is revoking from its standard for
flammable and combustible liquids
American Petroleum Institute Standard
No. 12A, Specification for Oil Storage
Tanks with Riveted Shells, Seventh
Edition, September 1951 (API 12A).
OSHA included API 12A in the
standard to provide employers with one
E:\FR\FM\13SER1.SGM
13SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53922-53925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18108]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 51
RIN 1400-AC11
[Public Notice: 5186]
New Passport Amendment Policy
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends the passport regulations to abolish the U.S.
passport amendment process, except for the convenience of the U.S.
Government, and broadens the reasons for issuing a replacement passport
at no additional cost to the applicant. The rule also adds unpaid fees
as a ground for invalidating a passport.
DATES: This rule will become effective on September 26, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Palmer-Royston, Office of
Passport Policy, Planning and Advisory Services, Bureau of Consular
Affairs, telephone 202-663-2662.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Analysis of Comments
The proposed rule was published on February 18, 2005. Comments were
accepted from the public for 45 days. We received only 2 comments in
response to the portion of the proposed rule that we are now publishing
in final. Neither comment objected to the proposed change in the
amendment process. Rather, both comments asked for greater detail as to
how the new procedures will work. The process is discussed below. The
comments are available for review at https://www.travel.state.gov, under
the passport section, or at the State Department reading room.
Rule Change
This rule was originally published in the Federal Register on
February 18,
[[Page 53923]]
2005 (70 FR 8305), as a proposed rule entitled ``Electronic Passport''
(RIN 1400-AB93) that included changes to the passport regulations
needed due to the pending introduction of the electronic passport. This
final rule separates the portions of the proposed regulation on
passport amendments, replacement passports and unpaid fees from the
portions of the proposed regulation that related exclusively to
electronic passports. We separated them because a large volume of
comments were received with respect to the introduction of the sections
of the rule relating exclusively to the electronic passport, which the
Department needs time to consider carefully. We do not believe,
however, that there is any need to delay making the changes in passport
amendment policy and the rules for invalidation of a passport planned
in the proposed rule. In addition to deleting the portions of the
proposed regulations relating exclusively to the electronic passport,
the final rule includes a few minor changes in wording, but does not
alter the substance of the proposed rule.
Regulatory Changes
Passport Amendments and Extensions Discontinued
By this rule, the Department discontinues the general practice of
amending passports to correct or change data elements relating to the
bearer or to the passport's validity period. This will improve document
security by presenting all personal information only on one page, the
passport data page. Moreover, in the future, the Department plans to
issue U.S. passports with an electronic chip as an additional security
feature. Once programmed, the chip cannot be edited. In order to
protect the security of the electronic passport, the passport data page
and the electronic chip would contain the same information.
Under this rule, when important information contained on the data
page of a passport, for example, the bearer's name or the passport
validity period, is changed, instead of manually amending the passport
to reflect the new information, the Department will cancel the passport
and issue a replacement. Issuance of a replacement will mean that the
data page will reflect the correct personal information of the passport
bearer and the correct validity period, and, in the case of an
electronic passport, that the information will be identical to the
information on the electronic chip. However, the rule reserves the
possibility of amending a passport for the convenience of the U.S.
Government in a small number of cases where it would be impossible or
inadvisable to issue a replacement, such as when a passport must be
limited in validity for direct return to the United States.
Application for Replacement Passport
Pursuant to Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 211a et
seq. and E.O. 11295, 31 FR 10603 (Aug. 5, 1966), the Secretary has
broad authority to issue regulations governing the issuance of
passports. There is no statutory requirement to permit amendments to
passports, as opposed to requiring that a new passport be issued when
personal, or other, information changes. The Secretary has in the past
exercised regulatory discretion to permit amendments. The current
regulations in Section 51.20 of Title 22, Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) requires that an application for a passport or for an amendment
of a passport shall be completed upon such forms as prescribed by the
Department. An applicant for a passport amendment uses a specified
application form. This rule will delete, in the first sentence of
section 51.20, the words ``an amendment,'' to reflect the decision to
discontinue amendments.
Section 51.64 of Title 22, CFR sets out the requirements for
replacement of a passport at no cost. This rule will add new categories
of such passports. The Department encourages U.S. citizens to keep
their U.S. passports up to date as a document of identity. Doing so
will help prevent unexpected problems that may occur when the identity
shown on their passport does not match other identity materials. To
encourage individuals to maintain passports that accurately reflect
their current names and to alleviate some of the cost burden, an
individual whose name has changed, as for example, through marriage or
by court order, within the first year of validity of a new passport
will be able to return the passport, along with a completed
application, new photographs and proof of the personal information
change for replacement with a full validity passport at no additional
cost. This rule will also allow issuance at no cost of a replacement
passport, for the balance of its period of validity, of a passport
needed by law enforcement or the judiciary for evidentiary purposes.
Nearly all passports applied for abroad, except limited validity
emergency passports, are printed in the United States. Applicants for
limited validity emergency passports must pay the fees that are charged
for a full-validity passport. This amendment provides that those who
have been issued a one-year validity passport for emergency travel may
apply for a full-validity replacement passport within one year of the
issuance of the limited passport for no additional cost.
New Ground for Invalidating a Passport
Under this rule, if full payment of all applicable passport fees is
not presented, as for example when a check is returned or a credit card
charge is disputed after issuance of a passport, the Department, in
addition to taking action to collect the delinquent fees under 22 CFR
part 34 and the Federal Claims Collection Act, may send the delinquent
bearer a letter to the bearer's last available address notifying him or
her that the passport has been invalidated because the applicable fees
have not been received. An invalidated passport cannot be used for
travel.
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is publishing this rule as a final rule, after
publishing a proposed rule, allowing a 45-day provision for public
comments, and consideration of all comments received. The Department
provided for a shorter comment period than the 60 days suggested by
Section 6(a) of E.O. 12866 because we believed 45 days would provide
the public with a meaningful opportunity to comment while advancing
important national security and foreign policy goals. In order to
protect the security of U.S. borders, it is essential that the
Department put the no amendment policy into effect as soon as possible.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business
These final regulations are hereby certified as not expected to
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612,
and Executive Order 13272, section 3(b).
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This final rule is not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804,
for purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking under the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law
104-121. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or
adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United States-based companies to compete
with
[[Page 53924]]
foreign based companies in domestic and export markets.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UFMA),
Public Law 104-4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally requires
agencies to prepare a statement before proposing any rule that may
result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State,
local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector. This rule will
not result in any such expenditure nor will it significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Nor will the rule have federalism
implications warranting the application of Executive Orders No. 12372
and No. 13132.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Review
The Department of State has reviewed this final rule to ensure its
consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in
Executive Order 12866 and has determined that the benefits of the
proposed regulation justify its costs. The Department does not consider
the proposed rule to be an economically significant regulatory action
within the scope of section 3(f)(1) of the Executive Order since it is
not likely to have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more or to adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities. However, because the proposed rule from which this final
rule is derived does have important policy implications and involves a
critical component of upgrading border security for the United States,
this final rule has been provided to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
The Department has reviewed the regulations in light of sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce
burden.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In conjunction with the proposed rule, the Department determined
that the portion of the proposed rule contained in this final rule
contains collection of information requirements for the purposes of the
PRA. The Department sought and received emergency six-month approvals
from OMB for the use of four information collections. The Department is
currently seeking three-year extensions of the OMB emergency approvals.
The extensions are the subject of separate Federal Register notices and
requests for public comment.
Two of the four collections involve existing forms that were
already scheduled for PRA renewal in 2005. The Department has revised
and updated the instructions associated with existing information
collections number 1405-0004 (DS-11, Application for a U.S. Passport)
and 1405-0020 (DS-82, Application for a U.S. Passport by Mail). Among
other changes, the revisions notify applicants that a passport may be
invalidated for lack of payment of the requisite fees.
The Department is also introducing two new collections of
information. One of the new collections will introduce a new form, DS-
5504 (U.S. Passport Re-Application Form), to permit application for a
replacement full-validity passport within one year of passport issuance
based on a change of name, incorrect data, or the emergency issuance
abroad of a one-year full-fee passport. The other new collection (DS-
4085, Application for Additional Visa Pages) will replace existing
information collection number 1405-0007, which relates to Form DS-19.
Form DS-19 is currently used to apply for amendment of a U.S. passport
or request issuance of extra visa pages. Because passport amendments no
longer will be made under the proposed rule, Form DS-19 will be
discontinued. In its place, Form DS-4085 will be introduced solely to
enable holders of a valid U.S. passport to request that extra visa
pages be added to the passport.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 51
Administrative practice and procedure, Drug traffic control,
Passports and visas.
0
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, 22 CFR Chapter
I is amended as follows:
PART 51--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 211a, 213, 2651a, 2671(d)(3), 2714 and
3926; 31 U.S.C. 9701; E.O. 11295, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p 570;
sec. 236, Public Law 106-113, 113 Stat. 1501A-430; 18 U.S.C.
1621(a)(2).
0
2. Section 51.4 is amended by revising paragraph (f) and adding
paragraph (h)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 51.4 Validity of passports.
* * * * *
(f) Limitation of validity. The Secretary may limit a passport's
validity period to less than the normal validity period. The bearer of
a limited passport may apply for a replacement passport, using the
proper application, and submitting the limited passport, applicable
fees, photos and additional documentation, if required, to support the
issuance of a replacement passport.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(3) The Department has sent a written notice to the bearer at the
bearer's last known address that the passport has been invalidated
because the Department has not received the applicable fees.
* * * * *
0
3-4. The first sentence of Sec. 51.20 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 51.20 General.
An application for a passport, a replacement passport, extra visa
pages, or other passport related service must be completed upon such
forms as the Department may prescribe.
* * * * *
0
5. Section 51.32 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 51.32 Passport Amendments.
Except for the convenience of the U.S. Government, no passport will
be amended.
0
6. Section 51.64 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 51.64 Replacement Passports.
A passport issuing office may issue a replacement passport for the
following reasons without payment of applicable fees:
(a) To correct an error or rectify a mistake of the Department.
(b) When the bearer has changed his or her name or other personal
identifier listed on the data page of the passport, and applies for a
replacement passport within one year of the date of the passport's
original issuance.
(c) When the bearer of an emergency full fee passport issued for a
limited validity period applies for a full validity passport within one
year of the date of the passport's original issuance.
(d) When a passport is retained by law enforcement or the judiciary
for
[[Page 53925]]
evidentiary purposes and the bearer is still eligible to have a
passport.
0
7. Section 51.66(a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 51.66 Expedited passport processing.
(a) Within the United States, an applicant for a passport service
(including issuance, replacement or the addition of visa pages) may
request expedited processing by a Passport Agency. All requests by
applicants for in-person services at a Passport Agency shall be
considered requests for expedited processing, unless the Department has
determined that the applicant is required to apply at a Passport
Agency.
* * * * *
0
8. The title of part 51, subpart E is revised to read as follows:
Subpart E--Limitations on Issuance or Use of Passports
* * * * *
Dated: September 6, 2005.
Maura Harty,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-18108 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P