Incidental Take of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Seismic Retrofit of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge, San Francisco Bay, CA, 54031-54035 [05-18089]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Notices
are cancelled because of other agency
priorities. Publication of this
announcement does not oblige NOAA to
award any specific project or to obligate
any available funds. The Department of
Commerce Pre-Award Notification
Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements contained in
the Federal Register notice of December
30, 2004 (69 FR 78389), are applicable
to this solicitation.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This document contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the
PRA. The use of Standard Forms 424,
424A, 424B, SF-LLL, 269, 272, and CD–
346 has been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the respective control numbers 0348–
0043, 0348–0044, 0348–0040, 0348–
0046, 0348–0039, 0348–0003, and 0605–
0001. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
It has been determined that this notice
does not contain policies with
Federalism implications as that term is
defined in Executive Order 13132.
Administrative Procedure Act/
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Prior notice and an opportunity for
public comment are not required by the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other law for rules concerning public
property, loans, grants, benefits, and
contracts (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2)). Because
notice and opportunity for comment are
not required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 or
any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do
not apply. Therefore, a regulatory
flexibility analysis has not been
prepared.
Dated: September 7, 2005.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–18087 Filed 9–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:06 Sep 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 030805A]
Incidental Take of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Specified Activities;
Seismic Retrofit of the Richmond-San
Rafael Bridge, San Francisco Bay, CA
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of issuance of an
incidental harassment authorization.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with provisions
of the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), notification is hereby given
that an Incidental Harassment
Authorization (IHA) has been issued to
the California Department of
Transportation (CALTRANS) to take
small numbers of marine mammals, by
harassment, incidental to seismic
retrofit construction of the RichmondSan Rafael Bridge (the Bridge), San
Francisco Bay (SFB), CA.
DATES: This authorization is effective
from September 06, 2005 to September
06, 2006.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the application
may be obtained by writing to Stephen
L. Leathery, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910
or by telephoning the contacts listed
here. Documents cited in this notice
may be viewed, by appointment, during
regular business hours, at this address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Layne Bolen, NMFS, (301) 713–2289,
ext. 117 or Monica DeAngelis, NMFS
Southwest Region, (562) 980–3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary)
to allow, upon request, the incidental,
but not intentional taking of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage
in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and regulations are issued.
An authorization may be granted if
the Secretary finds that the total taking
will have a negligible impact on the
species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses, and that the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54031
permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking
are set forth. NMFS has defined
‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103
as ‘‘an impact resulting from the
specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Subsection 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment. Except
for certain categories of actions not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Summary of Request
On December 16, 2004, NMFS
received a letter from CALTRANS
requesting reauthorization of an IHA
that was first issued to it on December
16, 1997 (62 FR 67045, December 23,
1997), was renewed on January 8, 2000
(65 FR 2375, January 14, 2000),
September 19, 2001 (66 FR 49165,
September 26, 2001), September 23,
2002 (67 FR 61323, September 30,
2002), and November 19, 2003 (68 FR
66076, November 25, 2003). The
authorization renewal request is for the
possible harassment of small numbers of
Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) and
possibly some California sea lions
(Zalophus californianus), incidental to
seismic retrofit construction of the
Bridge.
The Bridge is being seismically
retrofitted to withstand a future severe
earthquake. Construction is scheduled
to extend through the year 2005. A
detailed description of the work
planned is contained in the Final
Natural Environmental Study/Biological
Assessment for the Richmond-San
Rafael Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project
(CALTRANS, 1996). As in the previous
IHAs, activities will include excavation
around pier bases, hydro-jet cleaning,
installation of steel casings around the
piers with a crane, installation of micropiles, and installation of precast
concrete jackets. Foundation
construction will require approximately
2 months per pier, with construction
occurring on more than one pier at a
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
54032
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Notices
time. In addition to pier retrofit,
superstructure construction and tower
retrofit work may also be carried out.
Other seismic retrofit work will include:
1. Installation of isolation bearings,
needed to strengthen bridge structure;
2. Reinforcement of lower chord
members and diagonal trusses by
bolting new additional steel members
and gusset plates to the existing
members;
3. Cleaning and painting of new and
existing steel members;
4. Removal and replacement of the
truss shoe pins;
5. Deck rehabilitation and joint
replacement at various locations on the
bridge; and
6. Installation of temporary bracing
prior to the removal of the steel chevron
members on the piers followed by the
installation of permanent Eccentric
Braced Frames to provide additional
strength.
Because seismic retrofit construction
between piers 52 and 57 has the
potential to disturb harbor seals hauled
out on Castro Rocks, an IHA is
warranted.
Comments and Responses
A notice of receipt of the application
and proposed authorization was
published on April 5, 2005 (70 FR
17234), and a 30–day public comment
period was provided on the application
and proposed authorization. NMFS
received two comments on this IHA and
proposed authorization:
Comment 1: The Marine Mammal
Commission (Commission) reviewed the
application and concurs that the
Service’s preliminary determinations
are reasonable. The Commission
believes that the proposed mitigation
measures are appropriate and
recommends issuance of the IHA as
proposed.
Response: NMFS agrees.
Comment 2: A commenter stated, ‘‘I
oppose and object to the methods that
are being used that will kill marine life
in this area. These seals/sea lions
populations are already depleted.’’
Response: No take by injury and/or
death is anticipated, and harassment
takes will be reduced to the lowest level
practicable by implementation of the
proposed work restrictions and
mitigation measures (see Mitigation). No
deaths or injuries to marine mammals
have been reported in association with
this project since the first IHA issued in
1997.
Description of Habitat and Marine
Mammals Affected by the Activity
A description of SFB ecosystem and
its associated marine mammals can be
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:06 Sep 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
found in the CALTRANS application
(CALTRANS, 1997) and in CALTRANS
(1996). Castro Rocks are a small chain
of rocky islands located next to the
Bridge and approximately 1500 ft (460
m) north of the Chevron Long Wharf.
They extend in a southwesterly
direction for approximately 800 ft (240
m) from pier 55. The rocks start at about
55 ft (17 m) from pier 55 (A rock) and
end at approximately 250 ft (76 m) from
pier 53 (F rock). The chain of rocks is
exposed during low tides and inundated
during high tide.
Marine Mammals
General information on harbor seals
and other marine mammal species
found in Central California waters can
be found in Forney et al. (2000, 2001,
2003), which are available at the
following URL: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/PR2/
Stock_Assessment_Program/sars.html.
Please refer to these documents for
information on these species. The
marine mammals likely to be affected by
work in the Bridge area are limited to
harbor seals and California sea lions.
Harbor seals are widely distributed in
the North Atlantic and North Pacific,
and is the only marine mammal species
expected to be found regularly in the
Bridge area. The minimum size of the
California harbor seal population is
estimated at 25,720 animals (Forney et
al., 2003). A more detailed description
of harbor seals was provided in the 1997
proposed notification of issuance of an
authorization (62 FR 46480, September
3, 1997) with corrections and
clarifications provided on December 23,
1997 (62 FR 67045). This information is
not repeated here, but may be found in
those Federal Register notices. Pups are
born in mid- to late-March, peak
numbers of pups are observed in early
May, and, by the first week in June, all
pups are weaned (Kopec and Harvey,
1995). Estimated total mother and pup
pairs at Castro Rocks were 35 in 1999,
40 in 2000 and 40 in 2001 (A.
Bohorquez pers. comm in Green et al.,
2001). This represents approximately
22–24 percent of the pups born in SFB
annually. The maximum number of
individual pups hauled out at Castro
Rocks from 2002 to 2004 were 44, 48
and 56 pups, respectively (Green et al.,
2004). A maximum count of 594 adults
and immature harbor seals was recorded
at Castro Rocks in the Winter of 2004
(Green et al., 2004).
The California sea lion primarily uses
the Central SFB area to feed. California
sea lions are periodically observed at
Castro Rocks. The minimum population
size of the California sea lion (U.S.
stock) is estimated to be 138,881
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(Forney et al., 2003). No pupping or
regular haulouts occur in the project
area.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
The impact to the harbor seals and
California sea lions is expected to be
disturbance by the presence of workers,
construction noise, and construction
vessel traffic. Disturbance from these
activities is expected to have only a
short-term negligible impact to
approximately 600 adult and immature
harbor seals, 50 harbor seal pups, and
less than 5 sea lions annually (Green et
al., 2004; Green, D., pers. comm. August
26, 2005). These disturbances will be
reduced to the lowest level practicable
by implementation of the proposed
work restrictions and mitigation
measures (see Mitigation).
Marine mammal monitoring under
previous IHAs has been conducted at
Castro Rocks and at two ‘‘control’’ haulout locations in SFB - Mowry Slough
and Yerba Buena Island (Green et al.,
2004) since 1998. To date, over 14,000
hours of observations have been
conducted at these sites with two-thirds
of those hours at Castro Rocks. While
disturbances can consist of head alerts,
approaches to the water, and flushes
into the water, only the latter behavior
is considered by NMFS to be Level B
harassment under these circumstances.
At Castro Rocks, of all flush
disturbances monitored during the day,
the major harassment sources were
watercraft (e.g. motorboats, sailboats,
tankers, kayaks and jet skis) with 0.0990
disturbances/hr field time (d/hr);
wildlife (seals and birds) with 0.0635 d/
hr; other man-made (debris, workmen
on bridge, other people) with 0.0695 d/
hr; and automobiles with 0.0157 d/hr.
Construction activities resulted in
0.0165 d/hr. There were fewer flushes
observed at night. More detailed
information on the extent of disturbance
at Castro Rocks by activities other than
the requested authorization is available
in Green et al. (2004).
During the work period (July 16
through March 1), the incidental
harassment of harbor seals and, on rare
occasions, California sea lions is
expected to occur on a daily basis. In
addition, the number of seals disturbed
will vary daily depending upon tidal
elevations. Monitoring during
construction periods by Green et al.
(2004) indicates that although overall
seal numbers each month of the year are
not significantly different across years,
there are differences in subsite use by
seals at Castro Rocks during both the
daytime and nighttime. For example,
the average number of seals hauled out
on Castro Rocks (rocks A and C) during
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Notices
the fall of 2001 (when construction
activity was taking place within the area
of the haul-out site) was significantly
different than the average number of
seals hauled out on Castro Rocks during
1998–2000, prior to the construction
period. For a more detailed discussion
on the distribution of harbor seals
during the work and non-work periods
and levels of impact by various natural
and anthropogenic disturbance sources,
please see Green et al. (2004) which is
available upon request (see ADDRESSES).
California sea lions have been shown
to react to pile driving noise by
porpoising quickly away from the site
(SRS Technologies, 2001), but it is not
known whether they will react to
general construction noise and move
away from the rocks during construction
activities. However, sea lions are
generally thought to be more tolerant of
human activities than harbor seals and
are, therefore, less likely to be affected.
Potential Effects on Habitat
Short-term impacts of the activities
are expected to result in a temporary
reduction in utilization of the Castro
Rocks haulout site while work is in
progress or until seals acclimate to the
disturbance. This will not likely result
in any permanent reduction in the
number of seals at Castro Rocks. The
abandonment of Castro Rocks as a
harbor seal haulout and rookery is not
anticipated since existing traffic noise
from the Bridge, commercial activities at
the Chevron Long Wharf used for offloading crude oil, and considerable
recreational boating and commercial
shipping that currently occur within the
area have not caused long-term
abandonment. In addition, mitigation
measures and work restrictions are
designed to preclude abandonment.
Therefore, as described in detail in
CALTRANS (1996), other than the
potential short-term abandonment by
harbor seals of part or all of Castro
Rocks during retrofit construction, no
impact on the habitat or food sources of
marine mammals are likely from this
construction project.
Mitigation
Several mitigation measures to reduce
the potential for harassment will be
implemented by CALTRANS as part of
their activity. With the exception of the
Concrete Trestle Section, between 9
p.m. and 7 a.m. no piles will be driven
(i.e., no repetitive pounding of piles) on
the Bridge and noise levels will not
exceed 86 dBA at 50 ft (15 m). Seismic
retrofitting will cease in the vicinity of
Castro Rocks (piers 52 through 57)
during the pupping/molting restriction
period (March 1 through July 15).
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:06 Sep 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
Previous authorizations (1997–2001)
required CALTRANS to comply with
the following mitigation measures: (1) A
February 15 through July 31 restriction
on work in the water south of the Bridge
center line and retrofit work on the
Bridge substructure, towers,
superstructure, piers, and pilings from
piers 52 through 57; (2) no watercraft
will be deployed by CALTRANS
employees or contractors during the
year within the exclusion zone located
between piers 52 and 57 except for
when construction equipment is
required for seismic retrofitting of piers
52 through 57; and (3) minimize vessel
traffic to the greatest extent practicable
in the exclusion zone when conducting
construction activities between piers 52
and 57. From 1997 through September
2002, the boundary of the exclusion
zone was rectangular in shape (1700 ft
(518 m) by 800 ft (244 m)), completely
enclosing Castro Rocks and piers 52
through 57, inclusive. The northern
boundary of the exclusion zone was
located 300 ft (91 m) from the most
northern tip of Castro Rocks, and the
southern boundary was located 300 ft
(91 m) from the most southern tip of
Castro Rocks. The eastern boundary was
located 300 ft (91 m) from the most
eastern tip of Castro Rocks, and the
western boundary was located 300 ft (91
m) from the most western tip of Castro
Rocks. The exclusion zone is restricted
as a controlled access area and is
marked off with buoys and warning
signs for the entire year.
In 2002 (see 67 FR 61323, September
30, 2002), NMFS modified the Work/
Boat Exclusion Zone (W/BEZ) so that
the eastern boundary was shifted from
100 ft (31 m) east of Pier 57 to 100 ft
(31 m) west of Pier 57. This maintains
a 400–ft (122–m) ‘‘buffer’’ as opposed to
the previous 600–ft (183–m) buffer,
between the work at Pier 57 and ‘‘A’’
rock. This modification is reasonable
based on observed seal behavior during
the construction within the W/BEZ that
harbor seals adjusted their location
preference on Castro Rocks by moving
westerly to rocks further from the
construction (see discussion previously
in this document). However,
CALTRANS notes that there has not
been a statistically significant change in
the total numbers of animals that utilize
the Castro Rocks haulout. The eastern
boundary of the exclusion zone was
relocated to its original position at 300
ft (91 m) from the most eastern tip of
Castro Rocks upon conclusion of work
at Pier 57. This IHA does not include
any further changes of the exclusion
zone and will be identical to the
previous IHA.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54033
In addition to shifting the W/BEZ, in
2002, NMFS extended the period in
which work was allowed in the vicinity
of Castro Rocks from February 15th to
March 1st. CALTRANS requested this
modification due to unforseen
circumstances affecting the ability of the
contractor to the seismic retrofit work
on Pier 57. The original Work Closure
Period (February 15–July 31) was
designed to encompass the entire harbor
seal pupping and breeding seasons and
nearly the entire molting season at
Castro Rocks. Thus, the Work Closure
Period included the entire pupping
season at Castro Rocks and a substantial
pre-pupping period when females are
moving into pupping areas (see 62 FR
67045, December 23, 1997). Moving the
start of the Work Closure Period from
February 15th to March 1st still
provides a 2–week window prior to the
onset of successful pupping (March
15th), and because NMFS did not find
scientific evidence indicating that
female harbor seals need a ‘‘quiet
period’’ from general noise in order to
pup successfully, NMFS determined
that shifting the Work Closure Period
from February 15th to March 1st would
not have a significant impact on harbor
seal pupping.
In 2002, NMFS also modified the date
at which work is allowed to start in the
vicinity of Castro Rocks from August 1st
to a new date of July 16th. As
mentioned in previous documents,
newborn harbor seal pups are able to
swim immediately after birth (Zeiner et
al., 1990) and pups are weaned by the
first week of June. Therefore,
terminating the Closure Period on July
16th is not expected to affect pup
survival. Under previous authorizations,
the July 31st ending date for the Work
Closure Period was established to
protect harbor seals during the molting
season. However, those documents also
noted that NMFS believed that it is
likely that harbor seals evolved adaptive
mechanisms to deal with exposure to
the water during the molt. For example,
on some harbor seal haul-outs (such as
Castro Rocks) during the molting season
seals must enter the water once or even
twice a day due to tidal fluctuations
limiting access to the haul-out. Also,
since harbor seals lose hair in patches
during the molt, they are never
completely hairless and would not be as
vulnerable to heat loss in the water
during this period compared to other
seals (e.g., elephant seals) that lose their
all their hair at one time. Finally, NMFS
notes that if the levels of harbor seal
disturbance during the molt are
relatively high, seals are likely to utilize
other local haul-out sites during the
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
54034
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Notices
molt (DeLong, R., pers. comm. 1997;
Hanan, D., pers. comm. 1997; Harvey, J.,
pers. comm. 1997). Hanan (1996) found
that although harbor seals tagged at an
isolated southern California haul-out
tended to exhibit site-fidelity during the
molt, some seals were observed molting
at other nearby haul-outs. Based on
these reasons, NMFS determined that
terminating the Closure Period on July
16th would not significantly affect
harbor seals in general or molting seals
at Castro Rocks in particular.
Monitoring
NMFS will require CALTRANS to
continue to monitor the impact of
seismic retrofit construction activities
on harbor seals at Castro Rocks.
Monitoring will be conducted by one or
more NMFS-approved monitors.
CALTRANS is to monitor at least one
additional harbor seal haulout within
San Francisco Bay to evaluate whether
harbor seals use alternative haulout
areas as a result of seismic retrofit
disturbance at Castro Rocks.
The monitoring protocol will be
divided into the Work Period Phase
(July 16 through February 28) and the
Closure Period Phase (March 1 through
July 15). During the Work Period Phase
and Closure Period Phase, the
monitor(s) will conduct observations of
seal behavior at least 3 days/week for
approximately one tidal cycle each day
at Castro Rocks. The following data will
be recorded: (1) number of seals and sea
lions on site; (2) date; (3) time; (4) tidal
height; (5) number of adults, subadults,
and pups; (6) number of individuals
with red pelage; (7) number of females
and males; (8) number of molting seals
and sea lions; and (9) details of any
observed disturbances. Concurrently,
the monitor(s) will record general
construction activity, location, duration,
and noise levels. At least two nights/
week, the monitor will conduct a harbor
seal and sea lion census after midnight
at Castro Rocks. In addition, during the
Work Period Phase and prior to any
construction between piers 52 and 57,
inclusive, the monitor(s) will conduct
baseline observations of seal and sea
lion behavior at Castro Rocks and at the
alternative site(s) once a day for a period
of five consecutive days immediately
before the initiation of construction in
the area to establish pre-construction
behavioral patterns. During the Work
Period and Closure Period Phases, the
monitor(s) will conduct observations of
seal and sea lion behavior, and collect
appropriate data, at the alternative Bay
haulout at least three days/week (Work
Period) and two days/week (Closure
Period), during a low tide.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:06 Sep 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
In addition, NMFS will require that,
immediately following the completion
of the seismic retrofit construction of
the Bridge, the monitor(s) will conduct
observations of seal and sea lion
behavior, at Castro Rocks, at least five
days/week for approximately 1 tidal
cycle (high tide to high tide) each day,
for one week/month during the months
of April, July, October, and January. At
least two nights/week during this same
period, the monitor will conduct an
additional harbor seal and sea lion
census after midnight.
Reporting
Under previous IHAs, CALTRANS
has provided monitoring reports (Green
et al., 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004) that are
used by NMFS to help assess the
effectiveness of the mitigation measures
and corroborate our negligible impact
determination. Copies of these reports
are available upon request (see
ADDRESSES).
CALTRANS will provide weekly
reports to the Southwest Regional
Administrator (Regional Administrator),
NMFS, including a summary of the
previous week’s monitoring activities
and an estimate of the number of harbor
seals and sea lions that may have been
disturbed as a result of seismic retrofit
construction activities. These reports
will provide dates, time, tidal height,
maximum number of harbor seals
ashore, number of adults, sub-adults
and pups, number of females/males,
number of harbor seals with a red
pelage, and any observed disturbances.
A description of retrofit activities at the
time of observation and any sound
pressure levels measurements made at
the haulout will also be provided. A
draft 6–month interim report must be
submitted to NMFS by March 06, 2006.
Because seismic retrofit activities may
continue beyond the date of expiration
of this IHA (presumably under a new
IHA), a draft final report must be
submitted to the Regional Administrator
within 90 days after the expiration of
this IHA. A final report must be
submitted to the Regional Administrator
within 30 days after receiving comments
from the Regional Administrator on the
draft final report. If no comments are
received from NMFS, the draft final
report will be considered to be the final
report.
CALTRANS will provide NMFS with
a follow-up report on the postconstruction monitoring activities
within 18 months of project completion
in order to evaluate whether haulout
patterns are similar to the pre-retrofit
haul-out patterns at Castro Rocks.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Environmental Policy Act
NMFS prepared an Environmental
Assessment (EA) in 1997 that concluded
that the impacts of CALTRANS’ seismic
retrofit construction of the RichmondSan Rafael Bridge will not have a
significant impact on the human
environment. A copy of that EA, which
includes the Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) is available upon
request (see ADDRESSES). This action has
not changed significantly from the
action analyzed in the 1997 EA.
Therefore, this action is not expected to
change the analysis or conclusion of the
1997 EA.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
On January 27, 1997, NMFS
completed consultation under section 7
of the ESA with the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) on Caltrans’
proposed seismic retrofit work on the
Richmond-San Rafael Bridge. That
consultation concluded that the project
is not likely to adversely affect winterrun chinook salmon. Because the
proposed underlying action has not
changed significantly from that
considered in the consultation, NMFS
has preliminarily determined that
issuance of an IHA will not lead to any
effects to listed species nor critical
habitat for any species apart from those
that were considered in the consultation
on FHWA’s action.
Conclusions
NMFS has determined that the shortterm impact of the seismic retrofit
construction of the Bridge, as described
in this document, should result, at
worst, in the temporary modification in
behavior by small numbers of harbor
seals and, possibly, by small numbers of
California sea lions. While behavioral
modifications, including temporarily
vacating the haulout, may be made by
these species to avoid the resultant
visual and acoustic disturbance, this
action is expected to have a negligible
impact on the animals. In addition, no
take by injury and/or death is
anticipated, and harassment takes will
be at the lowest level practicable due to
incorporation of the mitigation
measures mentioned previously in this
document.
Authorization
For the reasons previously discussed,
NMFS has reissued an IHA for a 1–year
period, for the incidental harassment of
harbor seals and California sea lions
incidental to CALTRANS’ seismic
retrofit of the Richmond-San Rafael
Bridge, San Francisco Bay, CA,
provided the above mentioned
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Notices
requirements are incorporated without
the submission of additional scientific
information.
Dated: September 6, 2005.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–18089 Filed 9–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 083005A]
Advisory Committee to the U.S.
Section to the International
Commission for the Conservation of
Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT); Fall Meetings
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In preparation for the 2005
ICCAT meeting, the Advisory
Committee to the U.S. Section to
International Commission for the
Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
will hold two fall meetings. A summary
of the meeting topics is provided in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this notice.
DATES: The open sessions will be held
on September 21, 2005, from 8:30 a.m.
to 12:15 p.m. and October 17, 2005,
from 8 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Closed
sessions will be held on September 21,
2005, from 1:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.;
September 22, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 12
p.m.; October 17, 2005, from 11 a.m. to
5 p.m.; and October 18, 2005, from 8:30
a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Oral comments can
be presented during the public comment
session on October 17, 2005. Written
comments on issues being considered at
the meeting should be received no later
than September 30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at
the Hilton Hotel, 8727 Colesville Road,
Silver Spring, MD 20910. Written
comments should be sent to Erika
Carlsen at NOAA Fisheries Office of
International Affairs, Room 13114, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Erika Carlsen, (301) 713–2276.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Advisory Committee to the U.S. Section
to ICCAT will meet twice in open
sessions, on September 21 and October
17, 2005, during its fall meetings. At the
first session, the Advisory Committee
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:06 Sep 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
will receive reports on ICCAT
intersessional meetings, the domestic
implementation of prior ICCAT
decisions, and the implementation of
Advisory Committee recommendations.
At the second session, the Advisory
Committee will receive information on
the stock status of highly migratory
species and management
recommendations of ICCAT’s Standing
Committee on Research and Statistics.
The only opportunity for oral public
comment will be during the October 17,
2005 open session. Written comments
are encouraged and, if mailed, should be
received by September 30, 2005 (see
ADDRESSES). Written comments can also
be submitted during the open sessions
of the Advisory Committee meeting.
During its fall meetings, the Advisory
Committee will also hold several
executive sessions that are closed to the
public. The first executive session will
be held on September 21, 2005, after the
adjournment of the first open session. A
second executive session will be held
on September 22, 2005. During its
second fall meeting, the Advisory
Committee will also hold an executive
session on October 17, 2005,
immediately following the adjournment
of the second open session. The final
closed session will be held October 18,
2005. The purpose of these sessions is
to discuss sensitive information relating
to upcoming international negotiations.
NMFS expects members of the public
to conduct themselves appropriately for
the duration of the meeting. At the
beginning of the public comment
session, an explanation of the ground
rules will be provided (e.g., alcohol in
the meeting room is prohibited,
speakers will be called to give their
comments in the order in which they
registered to speak, each speaker will
have an equal amount of time to speak,
and speakers should not interrupt one
another). The session will be structured
so that all attending members of the
public are able to comment, if they so
choose, regardless of the degree of
controversy of the subject(s). Those not
respecting the ground rules will be
asked to leave the meeting.
Special Accommodations
The meeting locations are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Erika Carlsen at
(301) 713-2276 at least five days prior to
the meeting date.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54035
Dated: September 7, 2005.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–18077 Filed 9–8–05; 12:35 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0139]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Information Collection; Federal
Acquisition and Community Right-ToKnow
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for an
extension to an existing OMB clearance
(9000–0139).
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Actof 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Secretariat will be submitting to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve
an extension of a currently approved
information collection requirement
concerning the reporting requirements
of the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-To-Know Act of 1986
(42 U.S.C. 11001–11050) and the
Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (42
U.S.C. 13101–13109). The clearance
currently expires on December 31, 2005.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
November 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of the collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this
burden to the General Services
Administration, FAR Secretariat (VIR),
1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035,
Washington, DC 20405.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Ms.
Kimberly Marshall, Contract Policy
Division, GSA (202) 219–0986.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
FAR Subpart 23.9 and its associate
solicitation provision and contract
clause implement the requirements of
E.O. 12969 of August 8, 1995, published
in the Federal Register at 60 FR 40989,
August 10, 1995, ‘‘Federal Acquisition
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54031-54035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18089]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 030805A]
Incidental Take of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified
Activities; Seismic Retrofit of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge, San
Francisco Bay, CA
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of issuance of an incidental harassment authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection
Act (MMPA), notification is hereby given that an Incidental Harassment
Authorization (IHA) has been issued to the California Department of
Transportation (CALTRANS) to take small numbers of marine mammals, by
harassment, incidental to seismic retrofit construction of the
Richmond-San Rafael Bridge (the Bridge), San Francisco Bay (SFB), CA.
DATES: This authorization is effective from September 06, 2005 to
September 06, 2006.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the application may be obtained by writing to
Stephen L. Leathery, Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910 or by
telephoning the contacts listed here. Documents cited in this notice
may be viewed, by appointment, during regular business hours, at this
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Layne Bolen, NMFS, (301) 713-2289,
ext. 117 or Monica DeAngelis, NMFS Southwest Region, (562) 980-3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to allow, upon request,
the incidental, but not intentional taking of marine mammals by U.S.
citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial
fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain findings are
made and regulations are issued.
An authorization may be granted if the Secretary finds that the
total taking will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s),
will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the
species or stock(s) for subsistence uses, and that the permissible
methods of taking and requirements pertaining to the monitoring and
reporting of such taking are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible
impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as ``an impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably
likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.''
Subsection 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited
process by which citizens of the United States can apply for an
authorization to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by
harassment. Except for certain categories of actions not pertinent
here, the MMPA defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Summary of Request
On December 16, 2004, NMFS received a letter from CALTRANS
requesting reauthorization of an IHA that was first issued to it on
December 16, 1997 (62 FR 67045, December 23, 1997), was renewed on
January 8, 2000 (65 FR 2375, January 14, 2000), September 19, 2001 (66
FR 49165, September 26, 2001), September 23, 2002 (67 FR 61323,
September 30, 2002), and November 19, 2003 (68 FR 66076, November 25,
2003). The authorization renewal request is for the possible harassment
of small numbers of Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) and possibly
some California sea lions (Zalophus californianus), incidental to
seismic retrofit construction of the Bridge.
The Bridge is being seismically retrofitted to withstand a future
severe earthquake. Construction is scheduled to extend through the year
2005. A detailed description of the work planned is contained in the
Final Natural Environmental Study/Biological Assessment for the
Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project (CALTRANS, 1996).
As in the previous IHAs, activities will include excavation around pier
bases, hydro-jet cleaning, installation of steel casings around the
piers with a crane, installation of micro-piles, and installation of
precast concrete jackets. Foundation construction will require
approximately 2 months per pier, with construction occurring on more
than one pier at a
[[Page 54032]]
time. In addition to pier retrofit, superstructure construction and
tower retrofit work may also be carried out. Other seismic retrofit
work will include:
1. Installation of isolation bearings, needed to strengthen bridge
structure;
2. Reinforcement of lower chord members and diagonal trusses by
bolting new additional steel members and gusset plates to the existing
members;
3. Cleaning and painting of new and existing steel members;
4. Removal and replacement of the truss shoe pins;
5. Deck rehabilitation and joint replacement at various locations
on the bridge; and
6. Installation of temporary bracing prior to the removal of the
steel chevron members on the piers followed by the installation of
permanent Eccentric Braced Frames to provide additional strength.
Because seismic retrofit construction between piers 52 and 57 has
the potential to disturb harbor seals hauled out on Castro Rocks, an
IHA is warranted.
Comments and Responses
A notice of receipt of the application and proposed authorization
was published on April 5, 2005 (70 FR 17234), and a 30-day public
comment period was provided on the application and proposed
authorization. NMFS received two comments on this IHA and proposed
authorization:
Comment 1: The Marine Mammal Commission (Commission) reviewed the
application and concurs that the Service's preliminary determinations
are reasonable. The Commission believes that the proposed mitigation
measures are appropriate and recommends issuance of the IHA as
proposed.
Response: NMFS agrees.
Comment 2: A commenter stated, ``I oppose and object to the methods
that are being used that will kill marine life in this area. These
seals/sea lions populations are already depleted.''
Response: No take by injury and/or death is anticipated, and
harassment takes will be reduced to the lowest level practicable by
implementation of the proposed work restrictions and mitigation
measures (see Mitigation). No deaths or injuries to marine mammals have
been reported in association with this project since the first IHA
issued in 1997.
Description of Habitat and Marine Mammals Affected by the Activity
A description of SFB ecosystem and its associated marine mammals
can be found in the CALTRANS application (CALTRANS, 1997) and in
CALTRANS (1996). Castro Rocks are a small chain of rocky islands
located next to the Bridge and approximately 1500 ft (460 m) north of
the Chevron Long Wharf. They extend in a southwesterly direction for
approximately 800 ft (240 m) from pier 55. The rocks start at about 55
ft (17 m) from pier 55 (A rock) and end at approximately 250 ft (76 m)
from pier 53 (F rock). The chain of rocks is exposed during low tides
and inundated during high tide.
Marine Mammals
General information on harbor seals and other marine mammal species
found in Central California waters can be found in Forney et al. (2000,
2001, 2003), which are available at the following URL: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/PR2/Stock_Assessment_Program/sars.html.
Please refer to these documents for information on these species. The
marine mammals likely to be affected by work in the Bridge area are
limited to harbor seals and California sea lions.
Harbor seals are widely distributed in the North Atlantic and North
Pacific, and is the only marine mammal species expected to be found
regularly in the Bridge area. The minimum size of the California harbor
seal population is estimated at 25,720 animals (Forney et al., 2003). A
more detailed description of harbor seals was provided in the 1997
proposed notification of issuance of an authorization (62 FR 46480,
September 3, 1997) with corrections and clarifications provided on
December 23, 1997 (62 FR 67045). This information is not repeated here,
but may be found in those Federal Register notices. Pups are born in
mid- to late-March, peak numbers of pups are observed in early May,
and, by the first week in June, all pups are weaned (Kopec and Harvey,
1995). Estimated total mother and pup pairs at Castro Rocks were 35 in
1999, 40 in 2000 and 40 in 2001 (A. Bohorquez pers. comm in Green et
al., 2001). This represents approximately 22-24 percent of the pups
born in SFB annually. The maximum number of individual pups hauled out
at Castro Rocks from 2002 to 2004 were 44, 48 and 56 pups, respectively
(Green et al., 2004). A maximum count of 594 adults and immature harbor
seals was recorded at Castro Rocks in the Winter of 2004 (Green et al.,
2004).
The California sea lion primarily uses the Central SFB area to
feed. California sea lions are periodically observed at Castro Rocks.
The minimum population size of the California sea lion (U.S. stock) is
estimated to be 138,881 (Forney et al., 2003). No pupping or regular
haulouts occur in the project area.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
The impact to the harbor seals and California sea lions is expected
to be disturbance by the presence of workers, construction noise, and
construction vessel traffic. Disturbance from these activities is
expected to have only a short-term negligible impact to approximately
600 adult and immature harbor seals, 50 harbor seal pups, and less than
5 sea lions annually (Green et al., 2004; Green, D., pers. comm. August
26, 2005). These disturbances will be reduced to the lowest level
practicable by implementation of the proposed work restrictions and
mitigation measures (see Mitigation).
Marine mammal monitoring under previous IHAs has been conducted at
Castro Rocks and at two ``control'' haul-out locations in SFB - Mowry
Slough and Yerba Buena Island (Green et al., 2004) since 1998. To date,
over 14,000 hours of observations have been conducted at these sites
with two-thirds of those hours at Castro Rocks. While disturbances can
consist of head alerts, approaches to the water, and flushes into the
water, only the latter behavior is considered by NMFS to be Level B
harassment under these circumstances. At Castro Rocks, of all flush
disturbances monitored during the day, the major harassment sources
were watercraft (e.g. motorboats, sailboats, tankers, kayaks and jet
skis) with 0.0990 disturbances/hr field time (d/hr); wildlife (seals
and birds) with 0.0635 d/hr; other man-made (debris, workmen on bridge,
other people) with 0.0695 d/hr; and automobiles with 0.0157 d/hr.
Construction activities resulted in 0.0165 d/hr. There were fewer
flushes observed at night. More detailed information on the extent of
disturbance at Castro Rocks by activities other than the requested
authorization is available in Green et al. (2004).
During the work period (July 16 through March 1), the incidental
harassment of harbor seals and, on rare occasions, California sea lions
is expected to occur on a daily basis. In addition, the number of seals
disturbed will vary daily depending upon tidal elevations. Monitoring
during construction periods by Green et al. (2004) indicates that
although overall seal numbers each month of the year are not
significantly different across years, there are differences in subsite
use by seals at Castro Rocks during both the daytime and nighttime. For
example, the average number of seals hauled out on Castro Rocks (rocks
A and C) during
[[Page 54033]]
the fall of 2001 (when construction activity was taking place within
the area of the haul-out site) was significantly different than the
average number of seals hauled out on Castro Rocks during 1998-2000,
prior to the construction period. For a more detailed discussion on the
distribution of harbor seals during the work and non-work periods and
levels of impact by various natural and anthropogenic disturbance
sources, please see Green et al. (2004) which is available upon request
(see ADDRESSES).
California sea lions have been shown to react to pile driving noise
by porpoising quickly away from the site (SRS Technologies, 2001), but
it is not known whether they will react to general construction noise
and move away from the rocks during construction activities. However,
sea lions are generally thought to be more tolerant of human activities
than harbor seals and are, therefore, less likely to be affected.
Potential Effects on Habitat
Short-term impacts of the activities are expected to result in a
temporary reduction in utilization of the Castro Rocks haulout site
while work is in progress or until seals acclimate to the disturbance.
This will not likely result in any permanent reduction in the number of
seals at Castro Rocks. The abandonment of Castro Rocks as a harbor seal
haulout and rookery is not anticipated since existing traffic noise
from the Bridge, commercial activities at the Chevron Long Wharf used
for off-loading crude oil, and considerable recreational boating and
commercial shipping that currently occur within the area have not
caused long-term abandonment. In addition, mitigation measures and work
restrictions are designed to preclude abandonment.
Therefore, as described in detail in CALTRANS (1996), other than
the potential short-term abandonment by harbor seals of part or all of
Castro Rocks during retrofit construction, no impact on the habitat or
food sources of marine mammals are likely from this construction
project.
Mitigation
Several mitigation measures to reduce the potential for harassment
will be implemented by CALTRANS as part of their activity. With the
exception of the Concrete Trestle Section, between 9 p.m. and 7 a.m. no
piles will be driven (i.e., no repetitive pounding of piles) on the
Bridge and noise levels will not exceed 86 dBA at 50 ft (15 m). Seismic
retrofitting will cease in the vicinity of Castro Rocks (piers 52
through 57) during the pupping/molting restriction period (March 1
through July 15).
Previous authorizations (1997-2001) required CALTRANS to comply
with the following mitigation measures: (1) A February 15 through July
31 restriction on work in the water south of the Bridge center line and
retrofit work on the Bridge substructure, towers, superstructure,
piers, and pilings from piers 52 through 57; (2) no watercraft will be
deployed by CALTRANS employees or contractors during the year within
the exclusion zone located between piers 52 and 57 except for when
construction equipment is required for seismic retrofitting of piers 52
through 57; and (3) minimize vessel traffic to the greatest extent
practicable in the exclusion zone when conducting construction
activities between piers 52 and 57. From 1997 through September 2002,
the boundary of the exclusion zone was rectangular in shape (1700 ft
(518 m) by 800 ft (244 m)), completely enclosing Castro Rocks and piers
52 through 57, inclusive. The northern boundary of the exclusion zone
was located 300 ft (91 m) from the most northern tip of Castro Rocks,
and the southern boundary was located 300 ft (91 m) from the most
southern tip of Castro Rocks. The eastern boundary was located 300 ft
(91 m) from the most eastern tip of Castro Rocks, and the western
boundary was located 300 ft (91 m) from the most western tip of Castro
Rocks. The exclusion zone is restricted as a controlled access area and
is marked off with buoys and warning signs for the entire year.
In 2002 (see 67 FR 61323, September 30, 2002), NMFS modified the
Work/Boat Exclusion Zone (W/BEZ) so that the eastern boundary was
shifted from 100 ft (31 m) east of Pier 57 to 100 ft (31 m) west of
Pier 57. This maintains a 400-ft (122-m) ``buffer'' as opposed to the
previous 600-ft (183-m) buffer, between the work at Pier 57 and ``A''
rock. This modification is reasonable based on observed seal behavior
during the construction within the W/BEZ that harbor seals adjusted
their location preference on Castro Rocks by moving westerly to rocks
further from the construction (see discussion previously in this
document). However, CALTRANS notes that there has not been a
statistically significant change in the total numbers of animals that
utilize the Castro Rocks haulout. The eastern boundary of the exclusion
zone was relocated to its original position at 300 ft (91 m) from the
most eastern tip of Castro Rocks upon conclusion of work at Pier 57.
This IHA does not include any further changes of the exclusion zone and
will be identical to the previous IHA.
In addition to shifting the W/BEZ, in 2002, NMFS extended the
period in which work was allowed in the vicinity of Castro Rocks from
February 15th to March 1st. CALTRANS requested this modification due to
unforseen circumstances affecting the ability of the contractor to the
seismic retrofit work on Pier 57. The original Work Closure Period
(February 15-July 31) was designed to encompass the entire harbor seal
pupping and breeding seasons and nearly the entire molting season at
Castro Rocks. Thus, the Work Closure Period included the entire pupping
season at Castro Rocks and a substantial pre-pupping period when
females are moving into pupping areas (see 62 FR 67045, December 23,
1997). Moving the start of the Work Closure Period from February 15th
to March 1st still provides a 2-week window prior to the onset of
successful pupping (March 15th), and because NMFS did not find
scientific evidence indicating that female harbor seals need a ``quiet
period'' from general noise in order to pup successfully, NMFS
determined that shifting the Work Closure Period from February 15th to
March 1st would not have a significant impact on harbor seal pupping.
In 2002, NMFS also modified the date at which work is allowed to
start in the vicinity of Castro Rocks from August 1st to a new date of
July 16th. As mentioned in previous documents, newborn harbor seal pups
are able to swim immediately after birth (Zeiner et al., 1990) and pups
are weaned by the first week of June. Therefore, terminating the
Closure Period on July 16th is not expected to affect pup survival.
Under previous authorizations, the July 31st ending date for the Work
Closure Period was established to protect harbor seals during the
molting season. However, those documents also noted that NMFS believed
that it is likely that harbor seals evolved adaptive mechanisms to deal
with exposure to the water during the molt. For example, on some harbor
seal haul-outs (such as Castro Rocks) during the molting season seals
must enter the water once or even twice a day due to tidal fluctuations
limiting access to the haul-out. Also, since harbor seals lose hair in
patches during the molt, they are never completely hairless and would
not be as vulnerable to heat loss in the water during this period
compared to other seals (e.g., elephant seals) that lose their all
their hair at one time. Finally, NMFS notes that if the levels of
harbor seal disturbance during the molt are relatively high, seals are
likely to utilize other local haul-out sites during the
[[Page 54034]]
molt (DeLong, R., pers. comm. 1997; Hanan, D., pers. comm. 1997;
Harvey, J., pers. comm. 1997). Hanan (1996) found that although harbor
seals tagged at an isolated southern California haul-out tended to
exhibit site-fidelity during the molt, some seals were observed molting
at other nearby haul-outs. Based on these reasons, NMFS determined that
terminating the Closure Period on July 16th would not significantly
affect harbor seals in general or molting seals at Castro Rocks in
particular.
Monitoring
NMFS will require CALTRANS to continue to monitor the impact of
seismic retrofit construction activities on harbor seals at Castro
Rocks. Monitoring will be conducted by one or more NMFS-approved
monitors. CALTRANS is to monitor at least one additional harbor seal
haulout within San Francisco Bay to evaluate whether harbor seals use
alternative haulout areas as a result of seismic retrofit disturbance
at Castro Rocks.
The monitoring protocol will be divided into the Work Period Phase
(July 16 through February 28) and the Closure Period Phase (March 1
through July 15). During the Work Period Phase and Closure Period
Phase, the monitor(s) will conduct observations of seal behavior at
least 3 days/week for approximately one tidal cycle each day at Castro
Rocks. The following data will be recorded: (1) number of seals and sea
lions on site; (2) date; (3) time; (4) tidal height; (5) number of
adults, subadults, and pups; (6) number of individuals with red pelage;
(7) number of females and males; (8) number of molting seals and sea
lions; and (9) details of any observed disturbances. Concurrently, the
monitor(s) will record general construction activity, location,
duration, and noise levels. At least two nights/week, the monitor will
conduct a harbor seal and sea lion census after midnight at Castro
Rocks. In addition, during the Work Period Phase and prior to any
construction between piers 52 and 57, inclusive, the monitor(s) will
conduct baseline observations of seal and sea lion behavior at Castro
Rocks and at the alternative site(s) once a day for a period of five
consecutive days immediately before the initiation of construction in
the area to establish pre-construction behavioral patterns. During the
Work Period and Closure Period Phases, the monitor(s) will conduct
observations of seal and sea lion behavior, and collect appropriate
data, at the alternative Bay haulout at least three days/week (Work
Period) and two days/week (Closure Period), during a low tide.
In addition, NMFS will require that, immediately following the
completion of the seismic retrofit construction of the Bridge, the
monitor(s) will conduct observations of seal and sea lion behavior, at
Castro Rocks, at least five days/week for approximately 1 tidal cycle
(high tide to high tide) each day, for one week/month during the months
of April, July, October, and January. At least two nights/week during
this same period, the monitor will conduct an additional harbor seal
and sea lion census after midnight.
Reporting
Under previous IHAs, CALTRANS has provided monitoring reports
(Green et al., 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004) that are used by NMFS to help
assess the effectiveness of the mitigation measures and corroborate our
negligible impact determination. Copies of these reports are available
upon request (see ADDRESSES).
CALTRANS will provide weekly reports to the Southwest Regional
Administrator (Regional Administrator), NMFS, including a summary of
the previous week's monitoring activities and an estimate of the number
of harbor seals and sea lions that may have been disturbed as a result
of seismic retrofit construction activities. These reports will provide
dates, time, tidal height, maximum number of harbor seals ashore,
number of adults, sub-adults and pups, number of females/males, number
of harbor seals with a red pelage, and any observed disturbances. A
description of retrofit activities at the time of observation and any
sound pressure levels measurements made at the haulout will also be
provided. A draft 6-month interim report must be submitted to NMFS by
March 06, 2006.
Because seismic retrofit activities may continue beyond the date of
expiration of this IHA (presumably under a new IHA), a draft final
report must be submitted to the Regional Administrator within 90 days
after the expiration of this IHA. A final report must be submitted to
the Regional Administrator within 30 days after receiving comments from
the Regional Administrator on the draft final report. If no comments
are received from NMFS, the draft final report will be considered to be
the final report.
CALTRANS will provide NMFS with a follow-up report on the post-
construction monitoring activities within 18 months of project
completion in order to evaluate whether haulout patterns are similar to
the pre-retrofit haul-out patterns at Castro Rocks.
National Environmental Policy Act
NMFS prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) in 1997 that
concluded that the impacts of CALTRANS' seismic retrofit construction
of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge will not have a significant impact on
the human environment. A copy of that EA, which includes the Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) is available upon request (see
ADDRESSES). This action has not changed significantly from the action
analyzed in the 1997 EA. Therefore, this action is not expected to
change the analysis or conclusion of the 1997 EA.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
On January 27, 1997, NMFS completed consultation under section 7 of
the ESA with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on Caltrans'
proposed seismic retrofit work on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge. That
consultation concluded that the project is not likely to adversely
affect winter-run chinook salmon. Because the proposed underlying
action has not changed significantly from that considered in the
consultation, NMFS has preliminarily determined that issuance of an IHA
will not lead to any effects to listed species nor critical habitat for
any species apart from those that were considered in the consultation
on FHWA's action.
Conclusions
NMFS has determined that the short-term impact of the seismic
retrofit construction of the Bridge, as described in this document,
should result, at worst, in the temporary modification in behavior by
small numbers of harbor seals and, possibly, by small numbers of
California sea lions. While behavioral modifications, including
temporarily vacating the haulout, may be made by these species to avoid
the resultant visual and acoustic disturbance, this action is expected
to have a negligible impact on the animals. In addition, no take by
injury and/or death is anticipated, and harassment takes will be at the
lowest level practicable due to incorporation of the mitigation
measures mentioned previously in this document.
Authorization
For the reasons previously discussed, NMFS has reissued an IHA for
a 1-year period, for the incidental harassment of harbor seals and
California sea lions incidental to CALTRANS' seismic retrofit of the
Richmond-San Rafael Bridge, San Francisco Bay, CA, provided the above
mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
[[Page 54035]]
requirements are incorporated without the submission of additional
scientific information.
Dated: September 6, 2005.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-18089 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
