Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa, 53974-53975 [05-18013]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
53974
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
respect to the 50% of those funds that
would remain if the partial distribution
is granted. In Phase I of a cable royalty
distribution, royalties are distributed to
certain categories of broadcast
programming that have been
retransmitted by cable systems. The
categories have traditionally been
movies and syndicated television series,
sports programming, commercial and
noncommercial broadcaster-owned
programming, religious programming,
music and Canadian programming. In
Phase II of a cable royalty distribution,
royalties are distributed to claimants
within each of the Phase I categories.
Any party submitting comments on the
existence of a Phase II controversy must
identify the category or categories in
which there is a dispute, and the extent
of the controversy or controversies.
The Board must be advised of the
existence and extent of all Phase I and
Phase II controversies by the end of the
comment period. It will not consider
any controversies that come to its
attention after the close of that period.
Dated: September 8, 2005.
Bruce G. Forrest,
Interim Chief Copyright Royalty Judge.
[FR Doc. 05–18128 Filed 9–12–05; 8:45 am]
4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901,
or e-mail to steckel.andrew@epa.gov, or
submit comments at https://
www.regulations.gov.
You can inspect copies of the
submitted SIP revisions, EPA’s technical
support document (TSD), and public
comments at our Region IX office during
normal business hours by appointment.
You may also see copies of the
submitted SIP revisions by appointment
at the following locations:
California Air Resources Board,
Stationary Source Division, Rule
Evaluation Section, 1001 ‘‘I’’ Street,
Sacramento, CA 95814; and
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air
Pollution Control District, 1990 East
Gettysburg Street, Fresno, CA 93726
A copy of the rule may also be
available via the Internet at https://
www.arb.ca.gov/drdb/drdbltxt.htm.
Please be advised that this is not an EPA
Web site and may not contain the same
version of the rule that was submitted
to EPA.
BILLING CODE 1410–72–P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jerald S. Wamsley, EPA Region IX, at
either (415) 947–4111, or
wamsley.jerry@epa.gov.
40 CFR Part 52
[CA–319–0488b; FRL–7966–3]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, San Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control
District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the San Joaquin Valley
Unified Air Pollution Control District
(SJVUAPCD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from
facilities storing and processing organic
liquids such as crude oil and petroleum
by-products. We are proposing to
approve local rules to regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air
Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act).
This
proposal addresses SJVUAPCD Rule
4623—Storage of Organic Liquids. In the
Rules and Regulations section of this
Federal Register, we are approving this
local rule in a direct final action without
prior proposal because we believe these
SIP revisions are not controversial.
However, if we receive adverse
comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule and
address the comments in subsequent
action based on this proposed rule.
We do not plan to open a second
comment period, so anyone interested
in commenting should do so at this
time. If we do not receive adverse
comments, no further activity is
planned. For further information, please
see the direct final action.
Dated: August 19, 2005.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 05–18018 Filed 9–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by October 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Andy
Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR–
DATES:
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:33 Sep 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R07–OAR–2005–IA–0005; FRL–7967–6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the state of Iowa
for the purpose of establishing
guidelines to identify stationary sources
of air pollution potentially subject to
Best Available Retrofit Technology
(BART) emission control requirements.
Owners and operators of stationary
sources meeting the eligibility criteria
will be required to submit source
identification and emission unit
description information to the state by
September 1, 2005. BART-eligibility
information is to be submitted on Iowa
Department of Natural Resources (IDNR)
form 542–8125 that lists facility
information and emission unit
identification and description. Annual
emission totals in tons-per-year
(potential) for PM10, NOX, SO2 and
VOCs are also required.
DATES: Comments on this proposed
action must be received in writing by
October 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to
Heather Hamilton, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
Comments may also be submitted
electronically or through hand delivery/
courier; please follow the detailed
instructions in the Addresses section of
the direct final rule which is located in
the rules section of this Federal
Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Hamilton at (913) 551–7039, or
by e-mail at hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
final rules section of the Federal
Register, EPA is approving the state’s
SIP revision as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
revision amendment and anticipates no
relevant adverse comments to this
action. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments
are received in response to this action,
no further activity is contemplated in
relation to this action. If EPA receives
relevant adverse comments, the direct
E:\FR\FM\13SEP1.SGM
13SEP1
53975
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed action. EPA will
not institute a second comment period
on this action. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so
at this time. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on part of
this rule and if that part can be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may
adopt as final those parts of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment. For additional information,
see the direct final rule which is located
in the rules section of this Federal
Register.
Dated: August 30, 2005.
William Rice,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 05–18013 Filed 9–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R09–OAR–2005–NV–01; FRL–7967–9]
Revisions to the Nevada State
Implementation Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Nevada State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern definitions, sulfur
emission regulations, and various other
burning regulations. We are proposing
to approve these regulations in order to
regulate their corresponding emission
sources under the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). We
are taking comments on this proposal
and plan to follow with a final action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by
October 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number R09–OAR–
2005–NV–01, by one of the following
methods:
1. Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. EPA prefers
receiving comments through this
electronic public docket and comment
system. Follow the on-line instructions
to submit comments.
2. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
3. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
4. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://docket.epa.gov/
rmepub/, including any personal
information provided, unless the
comment includes Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through the
agency Web site, eRulemaking portal or
e-mail. The agency Web site and
eRulemaking portal are ‘‘anonymous
access’’ systems, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send e-mail
directly to EPA, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the public comment.
If EPA cannot read your comment due
to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may
not be able to consider your comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub and in
hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some
information may be publicly available
only at the hard copy location (e.g.,
copyrighted material), and some may
not be publicly available in either
location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
section.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Julie
Rose, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–4126,
rose.julie@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What Regulations Did the State Submit?
B. What Is the Regulatory History of the
Nevada SIP?
C. What Is the Purpose of This Proposed
Rule?
II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How Is EPA Evaluating the Regulations?
B. Do the Regulations Meet the Evaluation
Criteria?
C. Public Comment and Final Action.
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What Regulations Did the State
Submit?
The NDEP submitted a large revision
to the applicable SIP on February 16,
2005. On August 18, 2005, the revision
became complete by operation of law
pursuant to 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V.
The primary purpose of this revision
is to clarify and harmonize State and
federally enforceable requirements.
Because this revision incorporates so
many changes from the 1970s and 1980s
vintage SIP regulations, EPA has
decided to review and act on the
submittal in a series of separate actions.
This Proposed rule is proposing to
approve a few of the provisions
contained in the February 2005
submittal. The remaining portions of the
submittal will be acted on in future
Federal Register actions.
Table 1 lists the provisions of the
Nevada Administrative Code (NAC)
addressed by this proposal with the
dates that they were adopted and
submitted by the Nevada Department of
Conservation and Natural Resources,
Division of Environmental Protection
(NDEP). Some of these provisions were
renumbered after their initial adoption.
TABLE 1.—SUBMITTED REGULATIONS
NAC No.
445B.001
445B.002
445B.004
445B.005
445B.006
445B.009
445B.011
445B.018
445B.022
445B.030
NAC title
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
VerDate Aug<18>2005
Adopted
Definitions .................................................................................................................................
Act .............................................................................................................................................
Administrator .............................................................................................................................
Affected Facility ........................................................................................................................
Affected Source ........................................................................................................................
Air-conditioning equipment .......................................................................................................
Air pollution ...............................................................................................................................
Ambient air ................................................................................................................................
Atmosphere ...............................................................................................................................
British thermal units ..................................................................................................................
15:33 Sep 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13SEP1.SGM
13SEP1
08/19/04
09/16/76
08/19/82
10/03/95
09/18/01
09/16/76
01/22/98
09/03/87
09/16/76
09/03/87
Submitted
02/16/05
02/16/05
02/16/05
02/16/05
02/16/05
02/16/05
02/16/05
02/16/05
02/16/05
02/16/05
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53974-53975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18013]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R07-OAR-2005-IA-0005; FRL-7967-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the state of Iowa for the purpose of establishing
guidelines to identify stationary sources of air pollution potentially
subject to Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) emission control
requirements. Owners and operators of stationary sources meeting the
eligibility criteria will be required to submit source identification
and emission unit description information to the state by September 1,
2005. BART-eligibility information is to be submitted on Iowa
Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) form 542-8125 that lists
facility information and emission unit identification and description.
Annual emission totals in tons-per-year (potential) for
PM10, NOX, SO2 and VOCs are also
required.
DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by
October 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Heather Hamilton, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Comments may also be submitted
electronically or through hand delivery/courier; please follow the
detailed instructions in the Addresses section of the direct final rule
which is located in the rules section of this Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Hamilton at (913) 551-7039, or
by e-mail at hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of the Federal
Register, EPA is approving the state's SIP revision as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no relevant adverse
comments to this action. A detailed rationale for the approval is set
forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are
received in response to this action, no further activity is
contemplated in relation to this action. If EPA receives relevant
adverse comments, the direct
[[Page 53975]]
final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed action. EPA
will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule
and if that part can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may
adopt as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment. For additional information, see the direct final rule
which is located in the rules section of this Federal Register.
Dated: August 30, 2005.
William Rice,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 05-18013 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
