Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions of Petitions Issued, 53708 [05-17909]

Download as PDF 53708 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 174 / Friday, September 9, 2005 / Notices Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to https:// dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room PL– 401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Linsenmeyer (202) 267–5174 or Susan Lender (202) 267–8029, Office of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91. Issued in Washington, DC, on September 1, 2005. Anthony F. Fazio, Director, Office of Rulemaking. Petitions for Exemption Docket No.: FAA–2005–22172. Petitioner: Cessna Aircraft Company. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 21.231(a)(1). Description of Relief Sought: Petitioner seeks an amendment to an exemption adding Delegation Option Authorization (DOA) for type, production, and airworthiness certification of new aircraft to an exemption permitting DOA authorization for derivatives of existing models. Docket No.: FAA–2005–21814. Petitioner: Redline Air Service. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 43.3. Description of Relief Sought: Redline Air Service (Redline) seeks an exemption that would allow a Redline pilot to change engine oil and engine oil filters without a mechanics certificate. Redline is located in a remote area of Alaska; flight time to a repair station for oil changes can represent an economic and sometimes a safety burden. Redline would establish a training program for Redline pilots with a repair station holding an Airframe and Powerplant mechanics certificate. [FR Doc. 05–17908 Filed 9–8–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration Notice of disposition of prior petition. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking provisions governing the application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption, part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice contains the disposition of certain petitions previously received. The purpose of this notice is to improve the public’s awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition. [Docket No. MARAD 2005 22327] ACTION: SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lender (202) 267–8029 or John Linsenmeyer (202) 267–5174, Office of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91. Issued in Washington, DC, on September 2, 2005. Anthony F. Fazio, Director, Office of Rulemaking. Disposition of Petitions Docket No.: FAA–2004–18676. Petitioner: Quest Diagnostics, Inc. Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.207(d)(4). Description of Disposition: Quest Diagnostics, Inc. petitioned to operate certain aircraft without testing the emergency locator transmitter (ELT) for the presence of a sufficient signal radiated from its antenna. The FAA determined that testing the ELT for the presence of a sufficient signal radiated from its antenna is necessary to ensure the ELT functions properly in case of an emergency. The FAA is aware of the potential conflict between 14 CFR 91.207(d)(4) and 47 CFR 87.197. We are researching avenues to enable operators to comply with both rules. We recommended shielding the ELT antenna during testing or suppressing the antenna from emitting a signal. The FAA denied the exemption petition. Denial of Exemption, 08/29/2005, Exemption No. 8615. [Summary Notice No. PE–2005–55] [FR Doc. 05–17909 Filed 9–8–05; 8:45 am] Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions of Petitions Issued BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. AGENCY: VerDate Aug<18>2005 15:19 Sep 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Maritime Administration Information Collection Available for Public Comments and Recommendations Notice and request for comments. ACTION: SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the Maritime Administration’s (MARAD’s) intention to request extension of approval for three years of a currently approved information collection. DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before November 8, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rodney McFadden, Maritime Administration, 400 Seventh Street Southwest, Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: 202–366–2647; FAX: 202– 493–2180; or E-MAIL: Rod.McFadden@dot.gov. Copies of this collection also can be obtained from that office. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title of Collection: Information to Determine Seamen’s Reemployment Rights—National Emergency. Type of Request: Extension of currently approved information collection. OMB Control Number: 2133–0526. Form Numbers: None. Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from date of approval by the Office of Management and Budget. Summary of Collection of Information: This collection is needed in order to implement provisions of the Maritime Security Act of 1996. These provisions grant reemployment rights and other benefits to certain merchant seamen serving aboard vessels used by the United States during times of national emergencies. The Maritime Security Act of 1996 establishes the procedures for obtaining the necessary MARAD certification for reemployment rights and other benefits. Need and Use of the Information: MARAD will use the information to determine if U.S. civilian mariners are eligible for reemployment rights under the Maritime Security Act of 1996. Description of Respondents: U.S. merchant seamen who have completed designated national service during a time of maritime mobilization need and are seeking reemployment with a prior employer. Annual Responses: 50 responses. Annual Burden: 50 hours. E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM 09SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 174 (Friday, September 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17909]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2005-55]


Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of disposition of prior petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption, 
part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice 
contains the disposition of certain petitions previously received. The 
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and 
participation in, this aspect of FAA's regulatory activities. Neither 
publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information 
in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of any petition 
or its final disposition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lender (202) 267-8029 or John 
Linsenmeyer (202) 267-5174, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal 
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 2, 2005.
Anthony F. Fazio,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Disposition of Petitions

    Docket No.: FAA-2004-18676.
    Petitioner: Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
    Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.207(d)(4).
    Description of Disposition: Quest Diagnostics, Inc. petitioned to 
operate certain aircraft without testing the emergency locator 
transmitter (ELT) for the presence of a sufficient signal radiated from 
its antenna. The FAA determined that testing the ELT for the presence 
of a sufficient signal radiated from its antenna is necessary to ensure 
the ELT functions properly in case of an emergency. The FAA is aware of 
the potential conflict between 14 CFR 91.207(d)(4) and 47 CFR 87.197. 
We are researching avenues to enable operators to comply with both 
rules. We recommended shielding the ELT antenna during testing or 
suppressing the antenna from emitting a signal. The FAA denied the 
exemption petition.
    Denial of Exemption, 08/29/2005, Exemption No. 8615.
[FR Doc. 05-17909 Filed 9-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.