Notice of Availability of a Supplement Analysis for Transportation, Storage, Characterization, and Disposal of Transuranic Waste Currently Stored at the Battelle West Jefferson Site Near Columbus, OH, 53353-53355 [05-17791]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2005 / Notices
meeting, NIST scientists presented
preliminary reports on technical work
tasks defined by resolutions adopted at
the January plenary meeting and one
additional resolution was adopted by
the Development Committee. The
Development Committee approved with
edits initial recommendations for
voluntary voting system guidelines at
the April 20 and 21, 2005 meeting. The
document, Voluntary Voting System
Guidelines Version 1: Initial Report was
submitted by the Development
Committee to the EAC as required by
HAVA on May 9, 2005. The EAC is
currently accepting public comment on
proposed voluntary voting system
guidelines through September 30, 2005.
Proposed guidelines and public
comment procedures are available at
https://www.eac.gov.
CONTACT INFORMATION: Allan Eustis, 100
Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8900,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899–8900, phone
301–975–5099. Written comments
concerning the Development
Committee’s operations should be
addressed to the contact person
indicated above, or to voting@nist.gov.
Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance
Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–17944 Filed 9–6–05; 2:50 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820–KF–M
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Notice of Availability of a Supplement
Analysis for Transportation, Storage,
Characterization, and Disposal of
Transuranic Waste Currently Stored at
the Battelle West Jefferson Site Near
Columbus, OH
Department of Energy.
Notice of availability of a
Supplement Analysis.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: DOE has prepared a
Supplement Analysis (SA) pursuant to
DOE regulations implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) at 10 CFR 1021.314. The SA
addresses DOE’s proposal to ship
approximately 37 cubic meters (1,307
cubic feet [ft3]) of transuranic (TRU)
waste from the Battelle Columbus
Laboratory West Jefferson site near
Columbus, Ohio, to the Savannah River
Site (SRS), a DOE site near Aiken, South
Carolina, or to Waste Control
Specialists, LLC (WCS), a commercial
facility in Andrews, Texas. The waste
was generated as part of the cleanup of
the West Jefferson site and consists of
approximately 12 cubic meters of
Contact Handled (CH) TRU waste and
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:25 Sep 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
approximately 25 cubic meters of
Remote Handled (RH) TRU waste. For
purposes of analysis, DOE assumed that
at SRS, the CH–TRU waste would be
characterized and transported to WIPP
for disposal, and the RH–TRU waste
would be stored for up to 5 years; at
WCS, the CH–TRU and RH–TRU waste
would be stored for up to 5 years. The
waste would be maintained in a safe,
secure manner until it can be processed
and disposed of at the Waste Isolation
Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, NM.
The Battelle West Jefferson facility is
privately owned; however, as part of the
closeout of its nuclear materials
research contract, DOE is assisting in
the remediation of the site. Contract
terms specify that all radioactive waste
generated during the facility cleanup is
‘‘DOE-owned’’ for the purposes of
disposal. The TRU waste must be
shipped off-site by December 31, 2005,
as Battelle’s Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) license will expire at
that time.
In the final Waste Management
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (WM PEIS, DOE/EIS–0200,
May 1997), DOE analyzed the potential
environmental impacts of the
management (treatment and storage) of
TRU waste at DOE sites. The Record of
Decision for the Department of Energy’s
Waste Management Program: Treatment
and Storage of Transuranic Waste (63
FR 3629 (1998)) (TRU Waste ROD)
documented DOE’s decision that, except
for the Sandia National Laboratory,
which would ship its waste to Los
Alamos National Laboratory, each DOE
site that generated or will generate TRU
waste will prepare and store its TRU
waste on the site until it can be
disposed of at WIPP. DOE noted that in
the future, it may decide to ship TRU
waste from sites where it may be
impractical to prepare the waste for
disposal to sites where DOE has or will
have the necessary capability. The sites
that could receive such shipments of
TRU waste are the Idaho National
Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho; the
Oak Ridge Reservation, near Oak Ridge,
Tennessee; SRS; and the Hanford site,
near Richland, Washington.
Based on the SA, DOE has determined
that a supplement to the WM PEIS or a
new EIS is not needed. DOE plans to
issue an amended Record of Decision
(ROD) under the Waste Management
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (WM PEIS) for this waste no
sooner than 30 days from the
publication of this Notice.
DATES: DOE will consider all public
comments on this matter submitted by
October 11, 2005 before issuing a ROD.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53353
Comments should be
directed to: Mr. Harold Johnson,
Carlsbad Field Office, U.S. Department
of Energy, 4021 National Parks
Highway, Carlsbad, NM 88220,
Telephone: 505–234–7349, E-mail:
harold.johnson@wipp.ws.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the Supplement Analysis for
Transportation, Storage,
Characterization, and Disposal of
Transuranic Waste Currently Stored at
the Battelle West Jefferson Site near
Columbus, Ohio (DOE/EIS–0200–SA–
02) will be available on DOE’s Office of
Environmental Management Web site at:
https://www.em.doe.gov and on DOE’s
NEPA Web site at https://
www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/whatsnew/html.
To request printed copies of this
document, please write or call: The
Center for Environmental Management
Information, P.O. Box 23769,
Washington, DC 20026–3769,
Telephone: 1–800–736–3282 (in
Washington, DC: 202–863–5084).
For further information regarding the
storage characterization, and disposal of
Battelle West Jefferson TRU waste,
contact: Mr. Harold Johnson, Carlsbad
Field Office, U.S. Department of Energy,
4021 National Parks Highway, Carlsbad,
NM 88220, Telephone: 505–234–7349.
For further information on the DOE
program for the management of TRU
waste, contact: Ms. Lynne Smith, WIPP
Office EM–13, Office of Environmental
Management, U.S. Department of
Energy, 19001 Germantown Road,
Germantown, MD 20874, Telephone:
301–903–6828.
For information on DOE’s NEPA
process, contact: Ms. Carol Borgstrom,
Director, Office of NEPA Policy and
Compliance, EH–42, U.S. Department of
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585, Telephone
202–586–4600, or leave a message at 1–
800–472–2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) is
responsible for the disposal of
approximately 37 cubic meters (m3)
(1,307 cubic feet [ft3]) of transuranic
(TRU) waste generated as part of the
cleanup of the Battelle Columbus
Laboratory West Jefferson site near
Columbus, Ohio, and currently stored
on-site. TRU waste is waste that
contains alpha particle-emitting
radionuclides with atomic numbers
greater than uranium (92) and half-lives
greater than 20 years in concentrations
greater than 100 nanocuries per gram of
waste.
TRU waste is categorized as either
contact handled (CH) or remote handled
(RH), based on the radiation level at the
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
53354
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2005 / Notices
surface of the waste container. Some
TRU waste is also mixed waste, having
both radioactive and hazardous
components.
The Battelle West Jefferson facility is
privately owned; however, as part of the
closeout of its nuclear materials
research contract, DOE is assisting in
the remediation of the site. Contract
terms specify that all radioactive waste
generated during the facility cleanup is
‘‘DOE-owned’’ for the purposes of
disposal. DOE needs to ship the TRU
waste off-site by December 31, 2005, to
comply with Battelle’s Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) license,
which will expire at that time. Removal
of the TRU waste from the Battelle West
Jefferson site is also required to allow
site closure in fiscal year (FY) 2006.
In the Waste Management
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (WM PEIS), DOE analyzed
the potential environmental impacts of
the management (treatment and storage)
of TRU waste at DOE sites. The Record
of Decision for the Department of
Energy’s Waste Management Program:
Treatment and Storage of Transuranic
Waste (63 FR 3629 (1998)) (TRU Waste
ROD) documented DOE’s decision that,
with the exception of the Sandia
National Laboratory, which would send
its waste to Los Alamos National
Laboratory, each DOE site that has
generated or will generate TRU waste
will prepare and store its TRU waste on
the site, pending disposal at WIPP.
In an amended WM PEIS TRU Waste
ROD issued in 2002, DOE decided to
ship the Battelle West Jefferson TRU
waste to the Hanford Site for storage and
characterization prior to disposal at the
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP),
located near Carlsbad, New Mexico [67
FR 56989 (2002)]. After issuing that
decision, DOE completed three
shipments of the Battelle West Jefferson
TRU waste to Hanford (approximately 5
m3 [177 ft3]). In March 2003, DOE
suspended further shipments of this
TRU waste to Hanford, and
subsequently a preliminary injunction
stopping further shipments of TRU
waste to Hanford was issued by the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of
Washington in response to actions filed
by the State of Washington and
Columbia Riverkeeper.
Shipments of TRU waste to Hanford
for storage and characterization prior to
disposal at WIPP remained suspended
pending completion of the Hanford
Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous)
Waste Program Environmental Impact
Statement (Hanford Solid Waste EIS)
(DOE 2004a) and lifting of the
preliminary injunction. The Hanford
Solid Waste EIS was completed in
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:25 Sep 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
January 2004, and a Record of Decision
(ROD) was issued in June 2004.1 On
May 13, 2005, the district court issued
a decision allowing the shipment of
non-mixed TRU waste from the Battelle
West Jefferson site to Hanford. However,
the court has retained a preliminary
injunction against off site shipments of
mixed TRU to Hanford.
Although shipment of non-mixed
TRU waste to Hanford is no longer
enjoined, DOE has discovered
information that calls into question the
accuracy of some of the analyses
contained in the Hanford Solid Waste
EIS. Until these questions can be
addressed, DOE has decided not to ship
additional waste from Battelle West
Jefferson to Hanford. Nevertheless, by
the end of 2005, DOE needs to ship all
Battelle West Jefferson TRU waste to offsite storage so that Battelle can comply
with its NRC license and site closure
can occur in FY 2006.
DOE is now proposing to ship the
Battelle West Jefferson TRU waste to the
Savannah River Site (SRS), a DOE site
near Aiken, South Carolina, or to Waste
Control Specialists, LLC (WCS), a
commercial facility in Andrews, Texas.
For purposes of analysis, at SRS, the
CH-TRU waste would be characterized
and transported to WIPP for disposal,
and the RH-TRU waste would be stored
for up to 5 years pending ultimate
disposal at WIPP. At WCS, the CH- and
RH-TRU waste would be stored for up
to 5 years pending ultimate disposal at
WIPP.
DOE has a Hazardous Waste Facility
Permit modification request pending
before the New Mexico Environment
Department that seeks to modify the
characterization requirements for CHTRU waste, apply those modified
requirements to RH-TRU waste, and
allow DOE to dispose of RH-TRU waste
at WIPP. If DOE’s request is granted
without substantial modification, it may
be possible to characterize the Battelle
West Jefferson waste based on
knowledge of the contents of the waste,
without performing sampling and
analysis currently required for CH-TRU
waste under the WIPP Hazardous Waste
Facility Permit. If characterization can
be performed without additional
sampling and analysis, DOE would ship
the stored waste directly from SRS or
WCS to WIPP.
1 Record of Decision for the Solid Waste Program,
Hanford Site, Richland, Washington: Storage and
Treatment of Low-Level Waste and Mixed LowLevel Waste; Disposal of Low-Level Waste and
Mixed Low-Level Waste; and Storage, Processing,
and Certification of Transuranic Waste for
Shipment to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, 69 FR
39449 (2004) (Hanford Solid Waste ROD).
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
If the WIPP TRU waste
characterization requirements that are
established by the hazardous waste
facility permit modification cannot be
met at SRS or WCS, then DOE would
ship the waste from SRS or WCS to
Hanford, Idaho National Laboratory
(INL) (formerly known as the Idaho
National Engineering and
Environmental Laboratory), or Oak
Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) for
characterization prior to shipment to
WIPP for disposal. If SRS can meet the
characterization requirements, but WCS
cannot, the waste might also be shipped
from WCS to SRS for characterization
prior to shipment to WIPP for disposal.
Future decisions regarding where to
characterize the Battelle West Jefferson
TRU waste would be made based on (1)
consideration of the characterization
requirements that are eventually
established for that waste, and (2) the
characterization capabilities existing or
to be established at the different DOE
sites to meet those requirements. After
TRU waste characterization
requirements have been established, if
additional characterization were
needed, DOE would conduct
appropriate further National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
review, for any additional
characterization activities if necessary,
including the associated transportation
and shipment of the TRU waste to WIPP
for disposal.
DOE has prepared the SA in
accordance with DOE NEPA regulations
(10 CFR 1021.314) to determine whether
the proposed shipment of the Battelle
West Jefferson TRU waste for storage at
SRS or WCS prior to disposal at WIPP
is a substantial change to the proposal
or whether there are significant new
circumstances or information, relevant
to environmental concerns, such that a
supplement to the WM PEIS or a new
EIS would be needed. DOE has
concluded, based on the analysis in the
SA that the impacts of shipping the
waste to WCS or SRS would be very
small and would not add significantly to
impacts reported in prior NEPA
analyses. Accordingly, DOE has
determined that a supplement to the
WM–PEIS or a new EIS is not needed.
DOE plans to issue an amended ROD
under the WM PEIS for this waste no
sooner than 30 days from the
publication of this Notice. DOE will
consider all public comments on this
matter submitted by October 11, 2005
before issuing a ROD.
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2005 / Notices
Issued in Washington, DC, September 1,
2005.
James A. Rispoli,
Assistant Secretary for Environmental
Management.
[FR Doc. 05–17791 Filed 9–7–05; 8:45 am]
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on September 16, 2005.
Linda Mitry,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4872 Filed 9–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket Nos. RT04–1–015, ER04–48–015]
Southwest Power Pool, Inc.; Notice of
Filing
Combined Notice of Filings #1
August 31, 2005.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric rate
filings:
Docket Numbers: ER96–719–007.
Applicants: MidAmerican Energy
Company.
Description: MidAmerican Energy
Company submits Second Substitute
Sheet No. 5 to FERC Gas Tariff, Original
Volume No. 9, amending its compliance
filing submitted on 7/1/05 in Docket No.
ER96–719–005.
Filed Date: 08/24/2005.
Accession Number: 20050826–0187.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Wednesday, September 14, 2005.
Docket Numbers: ER01–642–003.
Applicants: Cottonwood Energy
Company LP.
Description: Cottonwood Energy
Company, LP submits a notice of change
in status and a revised market-based rate
tariff and a revised market-based rate
tariff.
Filed Date: 08/24/2005.
Accession Number: 20050826–0188.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Wednesday, September 14, 2005.
Docket Numbers: ER04–810–001.
Applicants: TransAlta Centralia
Generating L.L.C.
Description: TransAlta Centralia
Generation, L.L.C. submitted a
compliance filing to inform the
Commission that the Parties to the
settlement agreement approved by the
Commission in the order issued 4/19/
05, 111 FERC ¶ 61,087 (2005), have
recalculated and agreed to a revised
service factor beginning 10/1/05 in
accordance with the computation set
forth in TransAlta’s Rate Schedule FERC
No. 1.
Filed Date: 08/26/2005.
Accession Number: 20050829–0208.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Friday, September 16, 2005.
Docket Numbers: ER05–1395–000.
Applicants: Covanta Delaware Valley,
L.P.
Take notice that on August 26, 2005,
Southwest Power Pool, Inc., (SPP)
submitted an Independent Market
Monitoring Service Agreement with
Boston Pacific Company, Inc., as part of
SPP’s Open Access Transmission Tariff
pursuant to the request of the
Commission Staff. SPP requests an
effective date of July 1, 2005.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed on or before the
comment date. Anyone filing a motion
to intervene or protest must serve a copy
of that document on the Applicant and
all the parties in this proceeding.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:25 Sep 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
August 31, 2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53355
Description: Covanta Delaware Valley,
L.P. submits a notice of succession
notifying the Commission that, as the
result of name change, it adopts
American Ref-Fuel Company of
Delaware Valley, L.P.’s Supplement No.
3 to FERC Electric Rate Schedule
Original Volume No. 1 and FERC
Electric Tariff Original Volume No. 3
and submits amendments to the rate
schedules and tariffs to reflect the name
change.
Filed Date: 08/26/2005.
Accession Number: 20050829–0207.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Friday, September 16, 2005.
Docket Numbers: ER05–1396–000.
Applicants: Covanta Essex Company.
Description: Covanta Essex Company
submits a notice of succession notifying
the Commission that, as a result of a
name change, it adopts American RefFuel Company of Essex County’s
Supplement No. 3 to Rate Schedule
FERC No. 1 and FERC Electric Tariff,
Original Volume No. 2 and submits
amendments to the rate schedules and
tariffs to reflect the name change.
Filed Date: 08/26/2005.
Accession Number: 20050829–0206.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Friday, September 16, 2005.
Docket Numbers: ER05–1397–000.
Applicants: Covanta Hempstead
Company.
Description: Covanta Hempstead
Company submits a notice of succession
to notifying the Commission that as the
result of a name change, it adopts
American Ref-Fuel Company of
Hempstead’s FERC Electric Tariff,
Original Volume No. 1 as its own and
submits amendments to the rate
schedule to reflect the name change.
Filed Date: 08/26/2005.
Accession Number: 20050829–0205.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Friday, September 16, 2005.
Docket Numbers: ER05–1398–000.
Applicants: Covanta Niagara, L.P.
Description: Covanta Niagara, L.P.
submits a notice of succession notifying
the Commission that as a result of a
name change, it adopts American RefFuel Company of Niagara, L.P.’s FERC
Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1 as
its own and submits amendments to the
Rate Schedule to reflect the name
change.
Filed Date: 08/26/2005.
Accession Number: 20050829–0204.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Friday, September 16, 2005.
Docket Numbers: ER05–1399–000.
Applicants: Mississippi Power
Company.
Description: Mississippi Power
Company submits a request for
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53353-53355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17791]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Notice of Availability of a Supplement Analysis for
Transportation, Storage, Characterization, and Disposal of Transuranic
Waste Currently Stored at the Battelle West Jefferson Site Near
Columbus, OH
AGENCY: Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a Supplement Analysis.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DOE has prepared a Supplement Analysis (SA) pursuant to DOE
regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
at 10 CFR 1021.314. The SA addresses DOE's proposal to ship
approximately 37 cubic meters (1,307 cubic feet [ft\3\]) of transuranic
(TRU) waste from the Battelle Columbus Laboratory West Jefferson site
near Columbus, Ohio, to the Savannah River Site (SRS), a DOE site near
Aiken, South Carolina, or to Waste Control Specialists, LLC (WCS), a
commercial facility in Andrews, Texas. The waste was generated as part
of the cleanup of the West Jefferson site and consists of approximately
12 cubic meters of Contact Handled (CH) TRU waste and approximately 25
cubic meters of Remote Handled (RH) TRU waste. For purposes of
analysis, DOE assumed that at SRS, the CH-TRU waste would be
characterized and transported to WIPP for disposal, and the RH-TRU
waste would be stored for up to 5 years; at WCS, the CH-TRU and RH-TRU
waste would be stored for up to 5 years. The waste would be maintained
in a safe, secure manner until it can be processed and disposed of at
the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, NM.
The Battelle West Jefferson facility is privately owned; however,
as part of the closeout of its nuclear materials research contract, DOE
is assisting in the remediation of the site. Contract terms specify
that all radioactive waste generated during the facility cleanup is
``DOE-owned'' for the purposes of disposal. The TRU waste must be
shipped off-site by December 31, 2005, as Battelle's Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) license will expire at that time.
In the final Waste Management Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (WM PEIS, DOE/EIS-0200, May 1997), DOE analyzed the potential
environmental impacts of the management (treatment and storage) of TRU
waste at DOE sites. The Record of Decision for the Department of
Energy's Waste Management Program: Treatment and Storage of Transuranic
Waste (63 FR 3629 (1998)) (TRU Waste ROD) documented DOE's decision
that, except for the Sandia National Laboratory, which would ship its
waste to Los Alamos National Laboratory, each DOE site that generated
or will generate TRU waste will prepare and store its TRU waste on the
site until it can be disposed of at WIPP. DOE noted that in the future,
it may decide to ship TRU waste from sites where it may be impractical
to prepare the waste for disposal to sites where DOE has or will have
the necessary capability. The sites that could receive such shipments
of TRU waste are the Idaho National Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho;
the Oak Ridge Reservation, near Oak Ridge, Tennessee; SRS; and the
Hanford site, near Richland, Washington.
Based on the SA, DOE has determined that a supplement to the WM
PEIS or a new EIS is not needed. DOE plans to issue an amended Record
of Decision (ROD) under the Waste Management Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement (WM PEIS) for this waste no sooner than 30 days from
the publication of this Notice.
DATES: DOE will consider all public comments on this matter submitted
by October 11, 2005 before issuing a ROD.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be directed to: Mr. Harold Johnson, Carlsbad
Field Office, U.S. Department of Energy, 4021 National Parks Highway,
Carlsbad, NM 88220, Telephone: 505-234-7349, E-mail:
harold.johnson@wipp.ws.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the Supplement Analysis for
Transportation, Storage, Characterization, and Disposal of Transuranic
Waste Currently Stored at the Battelle West Jefferson Site near
Columbus, Ohio (DOE/EIS-0200-SA-02) will be available on DOE's Office
of Environmental Management Web site at: https://www.em.doe.gov and on
DOE's NEPA Web site at https://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/whatsnew/html. To
request printed copies of this document, please write or call: The
Center for Environmental Management Information, P.O. Box 23769,
Washington, DC 20026-3769, Telephone: 1-800-736-3282 (in Washington,
DC: 202-863-5084).
For further information regarding the storage characterization, and
disposal of Battelle West Jefferson TRU waste, contact: Mr. Harold
Johnson, Carlsbad Field Office, U.S. Department of Energy, 4021
National Parks Highway, Carlsbad, NM 88220, Telephone: 505-234-7349.
For further information on the DOE program for the management of
TRU waste, contact: Ms. Lynne Smith, WIPP Office EM-13, Office of
Environmental Management, U.S. Department of Energy, 19001 Germantown
Road, Germantown, MD 20874, Telephone: 301-903-6828.
For information on DOE's NEPA process, contact: Ms. Carol
Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, EH-42, U.S.
Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20585, Telephone 202-586-4600, or leave a message at 1-800-472-2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is
responsible for the disposal of approximately 37 cubic meters (m3)
(1,307 cubic feet [ft\3\]) of transuranic (TRU) waste generated as part
of the cleanup of the Battelle Columbus Laboratory West Jefferson site
near Columbus, Ohio, and currently stored on-site. TRU waste is waste
that contains alpha particle-emitting radionuclides with atomic numbers
greater than uranium (92) and half-lives greater than 20 years in
concentrations greater than 100 nanocuries per gram of waste.
TRU waste is categorized as either contact handled (CH) or remote
handled (RH), based on the radiation level at the
[[Page 53354]]
surface of the waste container. Some TRU waste is also mixed waste,
having both radioactive and hazardous components.
The Battelle West Jefferson facility is privately owned; however,
as part of the closeout of its nuclear materials research contract, DOE
is assisting in the remediation of the site. Contract terms specify
that all radioactive waste generated during the facility cleanup is
``DOE-owned'' for the purposes of disposal. DOE needs to ship the TRU
waste off-site by December 31, 2005, to comply with Battelle's Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) license, which will expire at that time.
Removal of the TRU waste from the Battelle West Jefferson site is also
required to allow site closure in fiscal year (FY) 2006.
In the Waste Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
(WM PEIS), DOE analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the
management (treatment and storage) of TRU waste at DOE sites. The
Record of Decision for the Department of Energy's Waste Management
Program: Treatment and Storage of Transuranic Waste (63 FR 3629 (1998))
(TRU Waste ROD) documented DOE's decision that, with the exception of
the Sandia National Laboratory, which would send its waste to Los
Alamos National Laboratory, each DOE site that has generated or will
generate TRU waste will prepare and store its TRU waste on the site,
pending disposal at WIPP.
In an amended WM PEIS TRU Waste ROD issued in 2002, DOE decided to
ship the Battelle West Jefferson TRU waste to the Hanford Site for
storage and characterization prior to disposal at the Waste Isolation
Pilot Plant (WIPP), located near Carlsbad, New Mexico [67 FR 56989
(2002)]. After issuing that decision, DOE completed three shipments of
the Battelle West Jefferson TRU waste to Hanford (approximately 5 m\3\
[177 ft\3\]). In March 2003, DOE suspended further shipments of this
TRU waste to Hanford, and subsequently a preliminary injunction
stopping further shipments of TRU waste to Hanford was issued by the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington in response
to actions filed by the State of Washington and Columbia Riverkeeper.
Shipments of TRU waste to Hanford for storage and characterization
prior to disposal at WIPP remained suspended pending completion of the
Hanford Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental
Impact Statement (Hanford Solid Waste EIS) (DOE 2004a) and lifting of
the preliminary injunction. The Hanford Solid Waste EIS was completed
in January 2004, and a Record of Decision (ROD) was issued in June
2004.\1\ On May 13, 2005, the district court issued a decision allowing
the shipment of non-mixed TRU waste from the Battelle West Jefferson
site to Hanford. However, the court has retained a preliminary
injunction against off site shipments of mixed TRU to Hanford.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Record of Decision for the Solid Waste Program, Hanford
Site, Richland, Washington: Storage and Treatment of Low-Level Waste
and Mixed Low-Level Waste; Disposal of Low-Level Waste and Mixed
Low-Level Waste; and Storage, Processing, and Certification of
Transuranic Waste for Shipment to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant,
69 FR 39449 (2004) (Hanford Solid Waste ROD).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although shipment of non-mixed TRU waste to Hanford is no longer
enjoined, DOE has discovered information that calls into question the
accuracy of some of the analyses contained in the Hanford Solid Waste
EIS. Until these questions can be addressed, DOE has decided not to
ship additional waste from Battelle West Jefferson to Hanford.
Nevertheless, by the end of 2005, DOE needs to ship all Battelle West
Jefferson TRU waste to off-site storage so that Battelle can comply
with its NRC license and site closure can occur in FY 2006.
DOE is now proposing to ship the Battelle West Jefferson TRU waste
to the Savannah River Site (SRS), a DOE site near Aiken, South
Carolina, or to Waste Control Specialists, LLC (WCS), a commercial
facility in Andrews, Texas. For purposes of analysis, at SRS, the CH-
TRU waste would be characterized and transported to WIPP for disposal,
and the RH-TRU waste would be stored for up to 5 years pending ultimate
disposal at WIPP. At WCS, the CH- and RH-TRU waste would be stored for
up to 5 years pending ultimate disposal at WIPP.
DOE has a Hazardous Waste Facility Permit modification request
pending before the New Mexico Environment Department that seeks to
modify the characterization requirements for CH-TRU waste, apply those
modified requirements to RH-TRU waste, and allow DOE to dispose of RH-
TRU waste at WIPP. If DOE's request is granted without substantial
modification, it may be possible to characterize the Battelle West
Jefferson waste based on knowledge of the contents of the waste,
without performing sampling and analysis currently required for CH-TRU
waste under the WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit. If
characterization can be performed without additional sampling and
analysis, DOE would ship the stored waste directly from SRS or WCS to
WIPP.
If the WIPP TRU waste characterization requirements that are
established by the hazardous waste facility permit modification cannot
be met at SRS or WCS, then DOE would ship the waste from SRS or WCS to
Hanford, Idaho National Laboratory (INL) (formerly known as the Idaho
National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory), or Oak Ridge
National Laboratory (ORNL) for characterization prior to shipment to
WIPP for disposal. If SRS can meet the characterization requirements,
but WCS cannot, the waste might also be shipped from WCS to SRS for
characterization prior to shipment to WIPP for disposal.
Future decisions regarding where to characterize the Battelle West
Jefferson TRU waste would be made based on (1) consideration of the
characterization requirements that are eventually established for that
waste, and (2) the characterization capabilities existing or to be
established at the different DOE sites to meet those requirements.
After TRU waste characterization requirements have been established, if
additional characterization were needed, DOE would conduct appropriate
further National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review, for any
additional characterization activities if necessary, including the
associated transportation and shipment of the TRU waste to WIPP for
disposal.
DOE has prepared the SA in accordance with DOE NEPA regulations (10
CFR 1021.314) to determine whether the proposed shipment of the
Battelle West Jefferson TRU waste for storage at SRS or WCS prior to
disposal at WIPP is a substantial change to the proposal or whether
there are significant new circumstances or information, relevant to
environmental concerns, such that a supplement to the WM PEIS or a new
EIS would be needed. DOE has concluded, based on the analysis in the SA
that the impacts of shipping the waste to WCS or SRS would be very
small and would not add significantly to impacts reported in prior NEPA
analyses. Accordingly, DOE has determined that a supplement to the WM-
PEIS or a new EIS is not needed.
DOE plans to issue an amended ROD under the WM PEIS for this waste
no sooner than 30 days from the publication of this Notice. DOE will
consider all public comments on this matter submitted by October 11,
2005 before issuing a ROD.
[[Page 53355]]
Issued in Washington, DC, September 1, 2005.
James A. Rispoli,
Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management.
[FR Doc. 05-17791 Filed 9-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P