Justice Management Division; Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation, 53133-53134 [05-17701]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 7, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(b) A petition to establish a Regional
Advisory Body shall include all
organizational documents and a
statement that the Regional Advisory
Body is composed of one member from
each participating state in the region,
appointed by the governor of each state,
and may include representatives of
agencies, states and provinces outside
the United States.
(c) A Regional Advisory Body
established by the Commission may
provide advice to the Commission,
Electric Reliability Organization or a
Regional Entity with respect to:
(1) The governance of an existing or
proposed Regional Entity within the
same region;
(2) Whether a Reliability Standard
proposed to apply within the region is
just, reasonable, not unduly
discriminatory or preferential, and in
the public interest;
(3) Whether fees for all activities
under this section proposed to be
assessed within the region are just,
reasonable, not unduly discriminatory
or preferential, and in the public
interest; and
(4) Any other responsibilities
requested by the Commission.
(d) The Commission may give
deference to the advice of a Regional
Advisory Body established by the
Commission if it is organized on an
Interconnection-wide basis.
§ 38.11
Reliability reports.
(a) The Electric Reliability
Organization shall conduct periodic
assessments of the reliability and
adequacy of the Bulk-Power System in
North America and report its findings to
the Commission, the Secretary of
Energy, Regional Entities, and Regional
Advisory Bodies annually or more
frequently if so ordered by the
Commission.
(b) The Electric Reliability
Organization and Regional Entities shall
report on their enforcement actions and
associated penalties to the Commission,
the Secretary of Energy, relevant
Regional Entities, and relevant Regional
Advisory Bodies annually or quarterly,
in a manner to be prescribed by the
Commission.
§ 38.12
Review of state action.
(a) Nothing in this regulation shall be
construed to preempt any authority of
any state to take action to ensure the
safety, adequacy, and reliability of
electric service within that state, as long
as such action is not inconsistent with
any reliability standard.
(b) Where a state takes action to
ensure safety, adequacy, and reliability
of electric service, the Electric
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:04 Sep 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
Reliability Organization, Regional Entity
or other affected party may apply to the
Commission for a determination of
consistency with a Commissionapproved Reliability Standard.
(1) The application shall:
(i) Identify the state action
complained of;
(ii) Identify the Reliability Standard(s)
with which the state action is claimed
to be inconsistent;
(iii) State the basis for the claim that
the state action is inconsistent with a
Reliability Standard; and
(iv) Include a form of notice.
(2) Within ninety (90) days of the
application of the Electric Reliability
Organization or other affected party, and
after notice and opportunity for public
comment, the Commission shall issue a
final order determining whether the
state action is inconsistent with a
Reliability Standard, taking into
consideration any recommendation of
the Electric Reliability Organization.
(c) The Commission, after
consultation with the Electric Reliability
Organization and the state taking action,
may stay the effectiveness of the state
action, pending the Commission’s
issuance of a final order.
§ 38.13 Funding of the Electric Reliability
Organization.
(a) The Electric Reliability
Organization shall file with the
Commission its proposed annual budget
for activities within the United States
and supporting materials in sufficient
detail to justify the requested funding
requirement 130 days in advance of the
beginning of each fiscal year.
(b) The Commission, after public
notice and opportunity for comment,
shall issue an order either accepting,
rejecting or remanding or modifying the
proposed Electric Reliability
Organization budget and business plan
no later than sixty (60) days in advance
of the beginning of the Electric
Reliability Organization’s fiscal year.
(c) Any person who submits an
application for certification as the
Electric Reliability Organization
pursuant to the rules set forth in this
section shall include in such
application a plan, formula and/or
methodology for the allocation and
assessment of Electric Reliability
Organization dues, fees and charges.
The certified Electric Reliability
Organization may subsequently file with
the Commission a request to modify the
plan, formula and/or methodology from
time-to-time in the Electric Reliability
Organization’s discretion.
(d) All entities within the
Commission’s jurisdiction as set forth in
section 215(b) of the Federal Power Act
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53133
are required to pay the Electric
Reliability Organization’s assessment of
dues, fees and charges in a timely
manner reasonably designated by the
Electric Reliability Organization .
(e) Any person who submits an
application for certification as the
Electric Reliability Organization
pursuant to the rules set forth in this
section may include in such application
a plan for a transitional funding
mechanism that would allow such
person, if certified as the Electric
Reliability Organization, to continue
existing operations without interruption
as it transitions from one method of
funding to another. The maximum
duration of any proposed transitional
funding mechanism is not to exceed
eighteen (18) months from the date of
certification.
[FR Doc. 05–17752 Filed 9–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 16
[AAG/A Order No. 009–2005]
Justice Management Division; Privacy
Act of 1974; Implementation
Justice Management Division,
Justice.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Justice Management Division
(JMD), proposes to exempt from certain
subsections of the Privacy Act, a new
Privacy Act system of records entitled
‘‘Federal Bureau of Investigation
Whistleblower Case Files, JMD–023,’’ as
described in today’s notice section of
the Federal Register. The system
maintains all documents and evidence
filed with the Director of the Office of
Attorney Recruitment and Management
(OARM), JMD, pertaining to requests for
corrective action by employees of, or
applicants for employment with, the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (or
recommendations for corrective action
by the Office of the Inspector General or
Office of Professional Responsibility)
brought under the FBI’s whistleblower
regulations.
Submit any comments by
October 17, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments in
writing to Mary Cahill, Management and
Planning Staff, Justice Management
Division, Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20530 (1400 National
Place Building), Facsimile Number (202)
307–1853. To ensure proper handling,
please reference the AAG/A Order No.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
53134
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 7, 2005 / Proposed Rules
on your correspondence. You may
review an electronic version of this
proposed rule at https://
www.regulations.gov. You may also
comment via the Internet to the DOJ/
Justice Management Division at the
following e-mail address:
DOJPrivacyACTProposed
Regulations@usdoj.gov; or by using the
https://www.regulations.gov comment
form for this regulation. When
submitting comments electronically,
you must include the AAG/A Order No.
in the subject box.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Cahill, (202) 307–1823.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FBI’s
whistleblower regulations are at 28 CFR
part 27; the specific role of the OARM
is at 28 CFR part 27.4. This is the basis
for the new system of records, ‘‘Federal
Bureau of Investigation Whistleblower
Case Files, JMD–023.’’ The DOJ/JMD
proposes to exempt this system of
records from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (4);
(d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1), (2), (3), (5),
and (8); and (g). The exemptions will be
applied only to the extent that
information in a record is subject to
exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2) and (k).
This order relates to individuals
rather than small business entities.
Nevertheless, pursuant to the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, this
order will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 16
Administrative Practices and
Procedures, Courts, Freedom of
Information, Sunshine Act, Privacy.
Pursuant to the authority vested in the
Attorney General by 5 U.S.C. 552a and
delegated to me by Attorney General
Order No. 793–78, it is proposed to
amend 28 CFR part 16 as follows:
1. The authority for part 16 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b(g),
and 553; 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509,
510, 534; 31 U.S.C. 3717, 9701.
§ 16.76
[Amended]
2. Section 16.76 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The following system of records is
exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and
(4); (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1), (2), (3),
(5), and (8); and (g): Federal Bureau of
Investigation Whistleblower Case Files
(Justice/JMD–023). These exemptions
apply only to the extent that
information in a record contained
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:04 Sep 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
within this system is subject to
exemptions pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2) and (k).
(d) Exemption from the particular
subsections is justified for the following
reasons:
(1) Subsection (c)(3). To provide the
subject with an accounting of
disclosures of records in this system
could inform that individual of the
existence, nature, or scope of an actual
or potential law enforcement or
counterintelligence investigation, and
thereby seriously impede law
enforcement or counterintelligence
efforts by permitting the record subject
and other persons to whom he might
disclose the records to avoid criminal
penalties, civil remedies, or
counterintelligence measures.
(2) Subsection (c)(4). This subsection
is inapplicable to the extent that an
exemption is being claimed for
subsection (d).
(3) Subsection (d)(1). Information
within this record system could relate to
official federal investigations and
matters of law enforcement. Individual
access to these records could
compromise ongoing investigations,
reveal confidential informants and/or
sensitive investigative techniques used
in particular investigations, or
constitute unwarranted invasions of the
personal privacy of third parties who
are involved in a certain investigation.
Disclosure may also reveal information
relating to actual or potential law
enforcement investigations. Disclosure
of classified national security
information would cause damage to the
national security of the United States.
(4) Subsection (d)(2). Amendment of
these records could interfere with
ongoing criminal or civil law
enforcement proceedings and impose an
impossible administrative burden by
requiring investigations to be
continuously reinvestigated.
(5) Subsections (d)(3) and (4). These
subsections are inapplicable to the
extent exemption is claimed from (d)(1)
and (2).
(6) Subsection (e)(1). It is often
impossible to determine in advance if
investigatory information contained in
this system is accurate, relevant, timely
and complete, but, in the interests of
effective law enforcement and
counterintelligence, it is necessary to
retain this information to aid in
establishing patterns of activity and
provide investigative leads.
(7) Subsection (e)(2). To collect
information from the subject individual
could serve to notify the subject
individual that he or she is the subject
of a criminal investigation and thereby
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
present a serious impediment to such
investigations.
(8) Subsection (e)(3). To inform
individuals as required by this
subsection could reveal the existence of
a criminal investigation and
compromise investigative efforts.
(9) Subsection (e)(5). It is often
impossible to determine in advance if
investigatory information contained in
this system is accurate, relevant, timely
and complete, but, in the interests of
effective law enforcement and
counterintelligence, it is necessary to
retain this information to aid in
establishing patterns of activity and
provide investigative leads.
(10) Subsection (e)(8). To serve notice
could give persons sufficient warning to
evade investigative efforts.
(11) Subsection (g). This subsection is
inapplicable to the extent that the
system is exempt from other specific
subsections of the Privacy Act.
Dated: August 31, 2005.
Paul R. Corts,
Assistant Attorney General for
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–17701 Filed 9–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FR–P
FEDERAL MEDIATION AND
CONCILIATION SERVICE
29 CFR Part 1404
Proposed Changes to Arbitration
Policies, Functions, and Procedures
Federal Mediation and
Conciliation Service.
ACTION: Proposed rule: extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document extends the
comment period for the proposed rule
published on July 7, 2005 at 70 FR page
39209.
The Federal Mediation and
Conciliation Service (FMCS) is
proposing to revise 29 CFR part 1404,
Arbitration Services. The revisions are
intended to set forth the criteria and
procedures for listing on the arbitration
roster, removal from the arbitration
roster, and expedited arbitration
processing. Other changes include how
parties may request arbitration lists or
panels and fees associated with the
arbitrators. The purpose of these
changes is to facilitate the management
and administration of the arbitration
roster.
Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
address section below on or before
December 6, 2005.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 7, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53133-53134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17701]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 16
[AAG/A Order No. 009-2005]
Justice Management Division; Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
AGENCY: Justice Management Division, Justice.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Justice Management Division
(JMD), proposes to exempt from certain subsections of the Privacy Act,
a new Privacy Act system of records entitled ``Federal Bureau of
Investigation Whistleblower Case Files, JMD-023,'' as described in
today's notice section of the Federal Register. The system maintains
all documents and evidence filed with the Director of the Office of
Attorney Recruitment and Management (OARM), JMD, pertaining to requests
for corrective action by employees of, or applicants for employment
with, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (or recommendations for
corrective action by the Office of the Inspector General or Office of
Professional Responsibility) brought under the FBI's whistleblower
regulations.
DATES: Submit any comments by October 17, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments in writing to Mary Cahill, Management
and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20530 (1400 National Place Building), Facsimile Number
(202) 307-1853. To ensure proper handling, please reference the AAG/A
Order No.
[[Page 53134]]
on your correspondence. You may review an electronic version of this
proposed rule at https://www.regulations.gov. You may also comment via
the Internet to the DOJ/Justice Management Division at the following e-
mail address: DOJPrivacyACTProposed Regulations@usdoj.gov; or by using
the https://www.regulations.gov comment form for this regulation. When
submitting comments electronically, you must include the AAG/A Order
No. in the subject box.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Cahill, (202) 307-1823.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FBI's whistleblower regulations are at
28 CFR part 27; the specific role of the OARM is at 28 CFR part 27.4.
This is the basis for the new system of records, ``Federal Bureau of
Investigation Whistleblower Case Files, JMD-023.'' The DOJ/JMD proposes
to exempt this system of records from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (4);
(d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1), (2), (3), (5), and (8); and (g). The
exemptions will be applied only to the extent that information in a
record is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and (k).
This order relates to individuals rather than small business
entities. Nevertheless, pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, this order will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 16
Administrative Practices and Procedures, Courts, Freedom of
Information, Sunshine Act, Privacy.
Pursuant to the authority vested in the Attorney General by 5
U.S.C. 552a and delegated to me by Attorney General Order No. 793-78,
it is proposed to amend 28 CFR part 16 as follows:
1. The authority for part 16 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b(g), and 553; 18 U.S.C.
4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 534; 31 U.S.C. 3717, 9701.
Sec. 16.76 [Amended]
2. Section 16.76 is amended by adding paragraphs (c) and (d) to
read as follows:
* * * * *
(c) The following system of records is exempted from 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3) and (4); (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1), (2), (3), (5),
and (8); and (g): Federal Bureau of Investigation Whistleblower Case
Files (Justice/JMD-023). These exemptions apply only to the extent that
information in a record contained within this system is subject to
exemptions pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and (k).
(d) Exemption from the particular subsections is justified for the
following reasons:
(1) Subsection (c)(3). To provide the subject with an accounting of
disclosures of records in this system could inform that individual of
the existence, nature, or scope of an actual or potential law
enforcement or counterintelligence investigation, and thereby seriously
impede law enforcement or counterintelligence efforts by permitting the
record subject and other persons to whom he might disclose the records
to avoid criminal penalties, civil remedies, or counterintelligence
measures.
(2) Subsection (c)(4). This subsection is inapplicable to the
extent that an exemption is being claimed for subsection (d).
(3) Subsection (d)(1). Information within this record system could
relate to official federal investigations and matters of law
enforcement. Individual access to these records could compromise
ongoing investigations, reveal confidential informants and/or sensitive
investigative techniques used in particular investigations, or
constitute unwarranted invasions of the personal privacy of third
parties who are involved in a certain investigation. Disclosure may
also reveal information relating to actual or potential law enforcement
investigations. Disclosure of classified national security information
would cause damage to the national security of the United States.
(4) Subsection (d)(2). Amendment of these records could interfere
with ongoing criminal or civil law enforcement proceedings and impose
an impossible administrative burden by requiring investigations to be
continuously reinvestigated.
(5) Subsections (d)(3) and (4). These subsections are inapplicable
to the extent exemption is claimed from (d)(1) and (2).
(6) Subsection (e)(1). It is often impossible to determine in
advance if investigatory information contained in this system is
accurate, relevant, timely and complete, but, in the interests of
effective law enforcement and counterintelligence, it is necessary to
retain this information to aid in establishing patterns of activity and
provide investigative leads.
(7) Subsection (e)(2). To collect information from the subject
individual could serve to notify the subject individual that he or she
is the subject of a criminal investigation and thereby present a
serious impediment to such investigations.
(8) Subsection (e)(3). To inform individuals as required by this
subsection could reveal the existence of a criminal investigation and
compromise investigative efforts.
(9) Subsection (e)(5). It is often impossible to determine in
advance if investigatory information contained in this system is
accurate, relevant, timely and complete, but, in the interests of
effective law enforcement and counterintelligence, it is necessary to
retain this information to aid in establishing patterns of activity and
provide investigative leads.
(10) Subsection (e)(8). To serve notice could give persons
sufficient warning to evade investigative efforts.
(11) Subsection (g). This subsection is inapplicable to the extent
that the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the
Privacy Act.
Dated: August 31, 2005.
Paul R. Corts,
Assistant Attorney General for Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-17701 Filed 9-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-FR-P