Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for a Permit Application for Navigation Modifications and Improvements as Part of the San Pedro Waterfront and Promenade Development, in the Port of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, CA, 53170-53172 [05-17691]
Download as PDF
53170
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 7, 2005 / Notices
of worsted wool fabric production
described in HTS 9902.51.11 or
9902.51.12, as appropriate, woven in the
United States in each of calendar years
1999, 2000 and 2001; and (5) the value
of worsted wool fabric production
described in HTS 9902.51.11 or
9902.51.12, as appropriate, woven in the
United States in each of calendar years
1999, 2000 and 2001. This data must
indicate actual production (not
estimates) of worsted wool fabric of the
kind described in HTS 9902.51.11 or
9902.51.12.
At the conclusion of the application,
the applicant must attest that ‘‘all
information contained in the
application is complete and correct and
no false claims, statements, or
representations have been made.’’
Applicants should be aware that,
generally, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3729,
persons providing a false or fraudulent
claims, and, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1001,
persons making materially false
statements or representations, are
subject to civil or criminal penalties,
respectively.
Information that is marked ‘‘business
confidential’’ will be protected from
disclosure to the full extent permitted
by law.
Other Application Requirements:
Complete applications must include the
following forms and documents: CD346, Applicant for Funding Assistance;
CD-511, Certifications Regarding
Debarment, Suspension and Other
Responsibility Matters; Drug-Free
Workplace Requirements and Lobbying;
SF-424, Application for Federal
Assistance; and SF-424B, Assurances Non-Construction Programs. The CD
forms are available via web site: https://
www.osec.doc.gov/forms/direct.htm
The SF forms are available via web site:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/
grantslforms.html.
This document contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The
use of Standard Forms 269, 424, 424A,
424B, SF-LLL, and CD-346 has been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the respective
control numbers 0348-0039, 0348-0043,
0348-0044, 0348-0040, 0348-0046, and
0605-0001. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Allocation Procedures: Section
4002(c)(6)(A) of the Act requires that
each grant be allocated among eligible
applicants on the basis of the percentage
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:05 Sep 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
of each manufacturers’ production of
the fabric described in HTS 9902.51.11
or HTS 9902.51.12 for calendar years
1999, 2000, and 2001, compared to the
production of such fabric by all
manufacturers who qualify for such
grants. Following the closing date of the
receipt of applications, the Department
shall calculate the appropriate
allocation of the allotted funds among
eligible applicants in accordance with
the statutory procedures. Award
decisions shall be final and not subject
to appeal or protest.
Intergovernmental Review:
Applications under this program are not
subject to Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs’’.
Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: Department of Commerce
Pre-Award Notifications for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements, which are
contained in the Federal Register Notice
of December 30, 2004 (69 FR 78389), are
applicable to this solicitation.
It has been determined that this notice
is not significant for purposes of E.O.
12866.
Administrative Procedure/Regulatory
Flexibility: Prior notice and an
opportunity for public comment are not
required by the Administrative
Procedure Act for rules concerning
public property, loans, grants, benefits,
and contracts (5 USC 553(a)(2)). Because
notice and opportunity for comment are
not required pursuant to 5 USC 553 or
any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 USC 601 et seq.) are
inapplicable. Therefore, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
has not been prepared.
Dated: September 2, 2005.
James C. Leonard III,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Textiles and
Apparel.
[FR Doc.05–17826 Filed 9–2–05; 2:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Corps of Engineers, Department of the
Army
Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement/Environmental
Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for a Permit
Application for Navigation
Modifications and Improvements as
Part of the San Pedro Waterfront and
Promenade Development, in the Port
of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County,
CA
AGENCY:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DOD.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Notice of intent (NOI).
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) Los Angeles District
in conjunction with the Los Angeles
Harbor Department (Port) is examining
the feasibility of various waterside
navigation improvements as part of the
Port’s proposed San Pedro Waterfront
and Promenade redevelopment proposal
in the Port of Los Angeles. The Corps is
considering the Port’s application for a
Department of the Army permit under
Clean Water Act Section 404 and River
and Harbor Act Section 10 to conduct
dredge and fill activities and construct
various navigation improvements
The primary Federal involvement is
the discharge of dredge and/or fill
materials within waters of the United
States, work (e.g. dredging) and
structures in or affecting navigable
waters of the United States, and
potential impacts on the human
environment from such activities.
Therefore, in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the Corps is requiring the
preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) prior to rendering a
final decision on the Port’s permit
application. The Corps may ultimately
make a determination to permit or deny
the above project or permit or deny
modified versions of the above project.
Pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
Port will serve as Lead Agency for the
Preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR). The Corps and the Port
have agreed to jointly prepare a Draft
EIS/EIR for the improvements at Berth
136–147 in order to optimize efficiency
and avoid duplication. The Draft EIS/
EIR is intended to be sufficient in scope
to address both the Federal and the state
and local requirements and
environmental issues concerning the
proposed activities and permit
approvals.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the proposed action
and Draft EIS/EIR can be answered by
Mr. Joshua Burnam, Corps Project
Manager, at (213) 452–3294. Comments
shall be addressed to: U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers, Los Angeles District,
Regulatory Branch. ATTN: File Number
2003–0–1142–JLB P.O. Box 532711, Los
Angeles, CA 90053–2325, and Dr. Ralph
Appy, Director of Environmental
Management, Port of Los Angeles, 425
S. Palos Verdes St., San Pedro, CA
90731.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Background. The EIS/EIR will
assess a master development plan for
specific development projects and
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 7, 2005 / Notices
associated infrastructure improvements
for approximately 418 acres, from the
Vincent Thomas Bridge to the federal
breakwater within the property of the
City of Los Angeles, Harbor Department.
The proposed project would be
developed over multiple phases
throughout the next approximately 30
years. The EIS/EIR will analyze the
master development plan at a
programmatic (general overview) level
to focus on the cumulative impacts
associated with the entire proposed
plan. Where information is available,
project elements proposed during Phase
1 (Years 1—5) and Phase 2 (Years 6—
10) will be studied at a project-specific
level of detail. Project elements
proposed for construction in Phase 3
(Years 11+) of the master development
plan and other project elements for
which data are not available will require
an additional CEQA and NEPA
evaluation, where appropriate, before
construction could occur.
2. Clean Water Act Project Purpose.
The overall project purpose relevant to
the Clean Water Act Section 404 is to:
(a) Perform modifications to the
existing shorefront, including water
cutouts to increase water area (up to
9.64 acres maximum) and fills, as
needed, to reconfigure the site to
provide for a variety of waterfront uses,
including berthing for visiting tall ships
and other vessels, additional marinas for
pleasure craft, water taxi and ferry
service, tugboats, and other recreational,
commercial, and port-related uses,
without impeding the public’s right to
free navigation;
(b) preserve or enhance natural
systems that are already within the Port
complex (i.e., beaches, salt marsh,
wetlands, shallow and deep water
habitat, and bluffs);
(c) utilize and enhance the value of
existing deep water in the Outer Harbor
and Main Channel by upgrading two
existing cruise vessel berths and
constructing up to two new cruise
vessel berths, each approximately 1,250
linear feet, to accommodate projected
future growth in the cruise ship
industry (one of the new cruise vessel
berths would operate 120 days per year);
(d) create a permanent berth for
Catalina Express and Island Express;
and
(e) provide for a variety of waterfront
uses, including berthing for visiting tall
ships and other vessels, additional
marinas for pleasure crafts, water taxi
and ferry service, tugboats, and other
recreational, commercial, and portrelated uses.
3. Issues. There are several potential
environmental issues that will be
addressed in the EIS/EIR. Additional
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:05 Sep 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
issues may be identified during the
scoping process. Issues initially
identified as potentially significant
include:
(a) Geological issues, including
dredging and stabilization of fill areas in
an area of known seismic activity;
(b) Impacts to hydrology;
(c) Impacts to air quality;
(d) Impacts to traffic, including
marine navigation and ground
transportation;
(e) Potential for noise impacts;
(f) Impacts to public utilities and
services;
(g) Potential impacts to aesthetic
resources, including light and glare;
(h) Potential impacts on public health
and safety;
(i) Cumulative impacts; and
(j) Disposal of dredged materials.
4. Alternatives. Alternatives initially
being considered for the proposed
improvement project include the
following:
(a) No Project/No Action. This
alternative would not implement any of
the elements presented in the project
description.
(b) No Federal Action Baseline. This
alternative is the proposed project
without any activity requiring a Corps
permit. This alternative represents
Corps’ environmental baseline.
(c) No Federal Action Baseline with
Cruise Ship Expansion. This alternative
represents an additional Corps
environmental baseline wherein LAHD
would only receive Corps permits for
the Cruise Ship Expansion/Modification
features of the proposed project. This
evaluation would allow Corps and
LAHD to separately weigh the impact of
the cruise ship facilities.
(d) Reduced Density Alternative. This
alternative would reduce the density or
amount of development as presented in
the project description. Results from
LAHD-sponsored June 4, 2005 Reduced
Development Alternative workshop,
held in conjunction with the Port
Community Advisory Committee and
the San Pedro Neighborhood Councils,
along with comments received by the
public, would define the project
elements included in this alternative.
(e) Maximum Density Alternative.
This alternative would increase the
density, amount of development, or
timing of development as presented in
the project description. Comments
received by the public and LAHD’s
Engineering and Project Design Team
would influence the project elements
included in this alternative.
5. Scoping Process. The U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and the Los Angeles
Harbor Department (LAHD) will jointly
conduct a public scoping meeting for
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53171
the proposed From Bridge to Breakwater
Master Development Plan for the San
Pedro Waterfront and Promenade
Project—Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS)/Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) to receive public comment
and assess public concerns regarding
the appropriate scope and preparation
of the Draft EIS/EIR. Participation in the
public meeting by Federal, state, and
local agencies and other interested
organizations and persons are
encouraged. This meeting will be
conducted in both English and Spanish.
Members of the public who wish to
communicate and listen entirely in
Spanish are encouraged to attend this
meeting. The meeting will be held on
October 11, 2005 from 6 p.m.—8:30 p.m.
at the Los Angeles Harbor Hotel, located
at 601 South Palos Verdes Street. Parties
interested in being added to the Corps’
electronic mail notification list for the
Port of Los Angeles can register at:
https://www.spl.usace.army.mil/
regulatory/register.html. This list will be
used in the future to notify the public
about scheduled hearings and
availability of future public notices.
Participation in the public meeting by
Federal, state and local agencies and
other interested organizations and
persons are encouraged.
During the public scoping hearing,
anyone wishing to make a statement
will be allocated a certain amount of
time to provide information on the
proposed project. The amount of time
each person is allowed will be directly
dependent on the number of people
who sign up to speak at the public
hearing. At this time, we estimate that
individuals will be given 3 minutes to
provide their comments verbally. We
would like to encourage interest groups
to designate an official spokesperson to
present the group’s views. We will
allocate a larger amount of time to
official representatives of such groups
upon request. Groups wishing to
designate an official representative must
notify the Corps in writing prior to, but
no later than October 4, 2005. The
determination of this extended speaking
time will be based on the number of
responses received by the Corps. This
rule will be strictly enforced at the
discretion of the Corps’ hearing officer.
Written and email comments to the
Corps and LAHD will be received until
October 28, 2005. Written comments
should be sent to the address below:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los
Angeles District, Regulatory Branch,
c/o Dr. Joshua Burnam, 915 Wilshire,
Los Angeles, California 90017–3401, email: Joshua.L.Burnam@usace.army.mil.
6. Availability of the Draft EIS/EIR.
The joint lead agencies expect the Draft
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
53172
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 7, 2005 / Notices
EIS/EIR to be made available to the
public in June 2006. A public hearing
will be held during the public comment
period for the Draft EIS/EIR.
Dated: August 22, 2005.
Mark R. Blackburn,
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army, Acting District
Engineer.
[FR Doc. 05–17691 Filed 9–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–92–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Part B—Assistance for Education of All
Children With Disabilities
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services; List of
Correspondence
Section 611—Authorization; Allotment;
Use of Funds; Authorization of
Appropriations
Department of Education.
List of correspondence from
April 1, 2005 through June 30, 2005.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Secretary is publishing
the following list pursuant to section
607(d) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act, as amended
(IDEA). Under section 607(d) of the
IDEA, the Secretary is required, on a
quarterly basis, to publish in the
Federal Register a list of
correspondence from the Department of
Education received by individuals
during the previous quarter that
describes the interpretations of the
Department of Education (Department)
of the IDEA or the regulations that
implement the IDEA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melisande Lee or JoLeta Reynolds.
Telephone: (202) 245–7468.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain a copy of this notice in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the contact persons listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following list identifies correspondence
from the Department issued from April
1, 2005 through June 30, 2005.
Included on the list are those letters
that contain interpretations of the
requirements of the IDEA and its
implementing regulations, as well as
letters and other documents that the
Department believes will assist the
public in understanding the
requirements of the law and its
regulations. The date of and topic
addressed by a letter are identified, and
summary information is also provided,
as appropriate. To protect the privacy
interests of the individual or individuals
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:05 Sep 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
involved, personally identifiable
information has been deleted, as
appropriate. Most of the changes made
to the IDEA by the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Improvement Act
of 2004 (IDEA 2004), which
reauthorized and amended the IDEA,
took effect on July 1, 2005. Because the
letters in this list were issued prior to
July 1, 2005, the effective date of IDEA
2004, statutory citations in this list refer
to the provisions of the IDEA that were
in effect prior to July 1, 2005.
Section 619—Preschool Grants
Topic Addressed: Allocation of
Funds.
• Letter dated June 20, 2005 to New
York State Education Department
Deputy Commissioner Dr. Rebecca Cort,
clarifying that the New York State
Education Department may not require
its local educational agencies (LEAs) to
pass through Part B funds to private
providers or counties in the form of a
suballocation required under New York
law, but that at an LEA’s discretion,
disbursements may be made to cover the
cost of providing special education and
related services to individual students
with disabilities.
Topic Addressed: Use of Funds.
• Letter dated May 5, 2005 to Guam
Associate Superintendent of Education
Vincent T. Leon Guerrero, clarifying
that Part B funds may be used to
purchase mini buses equipped with
wheelchair lifts operated solely to
provide transportation services for
eligible students with disabilities.
• Letter dated April 5, 2005 to
Louisiana Department of Education
Superintendent of Education Cecil J.
Picard, approving the State’s request to
use Part B funds to purchase computer
equipment and software to improve
educational services for students with
disabilities in the State’s residential
programs.
Section 612—State Eligibility
Topic Addressed: Children with
disabilities placed in private schools by
their parents.
• Office of Special Education
Programs Memorandum 05–09 dated
June 27, 2005 to Chief State School
Officers, regarding significant statutory
changes made by IDEA 2004 governing
the obligations of LEAs to parentallyplaced private school children with
disabilities attending private schools in
the LEA’s area of jurisdiction and
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
announcing that for the 2005–06 school
year only, the Secretary will allow
States and LEAs to use the best available
data in calculating the proportionate
amount of Federal funds to be expended
on services for parentally-placed private
school children with disabilities, in lieu
of conducting new child counts.
Topic Addressed: Participation of
children with disabilities in state and
district-wide assessments.
• Letter dated June 22, 2005 to New
Mexico Public Education Department
Director of Special Education Denise
Koscielniak, clarifying that IDEA
requirements governing the
participation of children with
disabilities in State and districtwide
assessments are applicable to New
Mexico’s kindergarten screening
program.
Section 613—Local Educational Agency
Eligibility
Topic Addressed: Charter schools.
• Letter dated June 3, 2005 to Arizona
Attorney Mary Ellen Simonson,
regarding the Department’s audit
determination that for-profit charter
schools are not eligible to receive funds
under IDEA or Title I Part A of the
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act.
Part C—Infants and Toddlers With
Disabilities
Section 636—Individualized Family
Service Plan
Topic Addressed: Natural
environments.
• Letter dated June 7, 2005 to
Washington Infant and Toddler Early
Intervention Program Director Sandy L.
Morris, regarding the natural
environments requirements in Part C of
IDEA, and clarifying that IDEA 2004
continues the Department’s
longstanding interpretation that early
intervention services must be provided
in a natural environment, unless a
written justification exists for providing
these services in other settings.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/
news/fedregister/.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53170-53172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17691]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army
Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for a Permit Application for
Navigation Modifications and Improvements as Part of the San Pedro
Waterfront and Promenade Development, in the Port of Los Angeles, Los
Angeles County, CA
AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.
ACTION: Notice of intent (NOI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Los Angeles District
in conjunction with the Los Angeles Harbor Department (Port) is
examining the feasibility of various waterside navigation improvements
as part of the Port's proposed San Pedro Waterfront and Promenade
redevelopment proposal in the Port of Los Angeles. The Corps is
considering the Port's application for a Department of the Army permit
under Clean Water Act Section 404 and River and Harbor Act Section 10
to conduct dredge and fill activities and construct various navigation
improvements
The primary Federal involvement is the discharge of dredge and/or
fill materials within waters of the United States, work (e.g. dredging)
and structures in or affecting navigable waters of the United States,
and potential impacts on the human environment from such activities.
Therefore, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the Corps is requiring the preparation of an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) prior to rendering a final decision on the
Port's permit application. The Corps may ultimately make a
determination to permit or deny the above project or permit or deny
modified versions of the above project.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
Port will serve as Lead Agency for the Preparation of an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR). The Corps and the Port have agreed to jointly
prepare a Draft EIS/EIR for the improvements at Berth 136-147 in order
to optimize efficiency and avoid duplication. The Draft EIS/EIR is
intended to be sufficient in scope to address both the Federal and the
state and local requirements and environmental issues concerning the
proposed activities and permit approvals.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the proposed action
and Draft EIS/EIR can be answered by Mr. Joshua Burnam, Corps Project
Manager, at (213) 452-3294. Comments shall be addressed to: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, Regulatory Branch. ATTN: File
Number 2003-0-1142-JLB P.O. Box 532711, Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325, and
Dr. Ralph Appy, Director of Environmental Management, Port of Los
Angeles, 425 S. Palos Verdes St., San Pedro, CA 90731.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Background. The EIS/EIR will assess a master development plan
for specific development projects and
[[Page 53171]]
associated infrastructure improvements for approximately 418 acres,
from the Vincent Thomas Bridge to the federal breakwater within the
property of the City of Los Angeles, Harbor Department. The proposed
project would be developed over multiple phases throughout the next
approximately 30 years. The EIS/EIR will analyze the master development
plan at a programmatic (general overview) level to focus on the
cumulative impacts associated with the entire proposed plan. Where
information is available, project elements proposed during Phase 1
(Years 1--5) and Phase 2 (Years 6--10) will be studied at a project-
specific level of detail. Project elements proposed for construction in
Phase 3 (Years 11+) of the master development plan and other project
elements for which data are not available will require an additional
CEQA and NEPA evaluation, where appropriate, before construction could
occur.
2. Clean Water Act Project Purpose. The overall project purpose
relevant to the Clean Water Act Section 404 is to:
(a) Perform modifications to the existing shorefront, including
water cutouts to increase water area (up to 9.64 acres maximum) and
fills, as needed, to reconfigure the site to provide for a variety of
waterfront uses, including berthing for visiting tall ships and other
vessels, additional marinas for pleasure craft, water taxi and ferry
service, tugboats, and other recreational, commercial, and port-related
uses, without impeding the public's right to free navigation;
(b) preserve or enhance natural systems that are already within the
Port complex (i.e., beaches, salt marsh, wetlands, shallow and deep
water habitat, and bluffs);
(c) utilize and enhance the value of existing deep water in the
Outer Harbor and Main Channel by upgrading two existing cruise vessel
berths and constructing up to two new cruise vessel berths, each
approximately 1,250 linear feet, to accommodate projected future growth
in the cruise ship industry (one of the new cruise vessel berths would
operate 120 days per year);
(d) create a permanent berth for Catalina Express and Island
Express; and
(e) provide for a variety of waterfront uses, including berthing
for visiting tall ships and other vessels, additional marinas for
pleasure crafts, water taxi and ferry service, tugboats, and other
recreational, commercial, and port-related uses.
3. Issues. There are several potential environmental issues that
will be addressed in the EIS/EIR. Additional issues may be identified
during the scoping process. Issues initially identified as potentially
significant include:
(a) Geological issues, including dredging and stabilization of fill
areas in an area of known seismic activity;
(b) Impacts to hydrology;
(c) Impacts to air quality;
(d) Impacts to traffic, including marine navigation and ground
transportation;
(e) Potential for noise impacts;
(f) Impacts to public utilities and services;
(g) Potential impacts to aesthetic resources, including light and
glare;
(h) Potential impacts on public health and safety;
(i) Cumulative impacts; and
(j) Disposal of dredged materials.
4. Alternatives. Alternatives initially being considered for the
proposed improvement project include the following:
(a) No Project/No Action. This alternative would not implement any
of the elements presented in the project description.
(b) No Federal Action Baseline. This alternative is the proposed
project without any activity requiring a Corps permit. This alternative
represents Corps' environmental baseline.
(c) No Federal Action Baseline with Cruise Ship Expansion. This
alternative represents an additional Corps environmental baseline
wherein LAHD would only receive Corps permits for the Cruise Ship
Expansion/Modification features of the proposed project. This
evaluation would allow Corps and LAHD to separately weigh the impact of
the cruise ship facilities.
(d) Reduced Density Alternative. This alternative would reduce the
density or amount of development as presented in the project
description. Results from LAHD-sponsored June 4, 2005 Reduced
Development Alternative workshop, held in conjunction with the Port
Community Advisory Committee and the San Pedro Neighborhood Councils,
along with comments received by the public, would define the project
elements included in this alternative.
(e) Maximum Density Alternative. This alternative would increase
the density, amount of development, or timing of development as
presented in the project description. Comments received by the public
and LAHD's Engineering and Project Design Team would influence the
project elements included in this alternative.
5. Scoping Process. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Los
Angeles Harbor Department (LAHD) will jointly conduct a public scoping
meeting for the proposed From Bridge to Breakwater Master Development
Plan for the San Pedro Waterfront and Promenade Project--Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
to receive public comment and assess public concerns regarding the
appropriate scope and preparation of the Draft EIS/EIR. Participation
in the public meeting by Federal, state, and local agencies and other
interested organizations and persons are encouraged. This meeting will
be conducted in both English and Spanish. Members of the public who
wish to communicate and listen entirely in Spanish are encouraged to
attend this meeting. The meeting will be held on October 11, 2005 from
6 p.m.--8:30 p.m. at the Los Angeles Harbor Hotel, located at 601 South
Palos Verdes Street. Parties interested in being added to the Corps'
electronic mail notification list for the Port of Los Angeles can
register at: https://www.spl.usace.army.mil/regulatory/register.html.
This list will be used in the future to notify the public about
scheduled hearings and availability of future public notices.
Participation in the public meeting by Federal, state and local
agencies and other interested organizations and persons are encouraged.
During the public scoping hearing, anyone wishing to make a
statement will be allocated a certain amount of time to provide
information on the proposed project. The amount of time each person is
allowed will be directly dependent on the number of people who sign up
to speak at the public hearing. At this time, we estimate that
individuals will be given 3 minutes to provide their comments verbally.
We would like to encourage interest groups to designate an official
spokesperson to present the group's views. We will allocate a larger
amount of time to official representatives of such groups upon request.
Groups wishing to designate an official representative must notify the
Corps in writing prior to, but no later than October 4, 2005. The
determination of this extended speaking time will be based on the
number of responses received by the Corps. This rule will be strictly
enforced at the discretion of the Corps' hearing officer. Written and
email comments to the Corps and LAHD will be received until October 28,
2005. Written comments should be sent to the address below: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, Regulatory Branch, c/o Dr.
Joshua Burnam, 915 Wilshire, Los Angeles, California 90017-3401, e-
mail: Joshua.L.Burnam@usace.army.mil.
6. Availability of the Draft EIS/EIR. The joint lead agencies
expect the Draft
[[Page 53172]]
EIS/EIR to be made available to the public in June 2006. A public
hearing will be held during the public comment period for the Draft
EIS/EIR.
Dated: August 22, 2005.
Mark R. Blackburn,
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army, Acting District Engineer.
[FR Doc. 05-17691 Filed 9-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-92-P