Safe Harbor Agreement and Receipt of Application for an Enhancement of Survival Permit Associated With the Restoration of Habitat and Reintroduction of Utah Prairie Dogs on Private Land in Sevier County, UT, 53242-53243 [05-17668]

Download as PDF 53242 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 7, 2005 / Notices statutory maximum interest rate for the period beginning July 1, 2005, is 41⁄2 percent; and (2) has approved the establishment of the debenture interest rate by the Secretary of HUD at 41⁄2 percent for the 6-month period beginning July 1, 2005. This interest rate will be the rate borne by debentures issued with respect to any insured loan or mortgage (except for debentures issued pursuant to section 221(g)(4)) with insurance commitment or endorsement date (as applicable) within the latter 6 months of 2005. For convenience of reference, HUD is publishing the following chart of debenture interest rates applicable to mortgages committed or endorsed since January 1, 1980: Effective interest rate On or after Prior to 91⁄2 ............... 97⁄8 ............... 113⁄4 ............. 127⁄8 ............. 123⁄4 ............. 101⁄4 ............. 103⁄8 ............. 111⁄2 ............. 133⁄8 ............. 115⁄8 ............. 111⁄8 ............. 101⁄4 ............. 81⁄4 ............... 8 ................... 9 ................... 91⁄8 ............... 93⁄8 ............... 91⁄4 ............... 9 ................... 81⁄8 ............... 9 ................... 83⁄4 ............... 81⁄2 ............... 8 ................... 8 ................... 73⁄4 ............... 7 ................... 65⁄8 ............... 73⁄4 ............... 83⁄8 ............... 71⁄4 ............... 61⁄2 ............... 71⁄4 ............... 63⁄4 ............... 71⁄8 ............... 63⁄8 ............... 61⁄8 ............... 51⁄2 ............... 61⁄8 ............... 61⁄2 ............... 61⁄2 ............... 6 ................... 57⁄8 ............... 51⁄4 ............... 53⁄4 ............... 5 ................... 41⁄2 ............... 51⁄8 ............... 51⁄2 ............... 47⁄8 ............... Jan. 1, 1980 July 1, 1980 Jan. 1, 1981 July 1, 1981 Jan. 1, 1982 Jan. 1, 1983 July 1, 1983 Jan. 1, 1984 July 1, 1984 Jan. 1, 1985 July 1, 1985 Jan. 1, 1986 July 1, 1986 Jan. 1, 1987 July 1, 1987 Jan. 1, 1988 July 1, 1988 Jan. 1, 1989 July 1, 1989 Jan. 1, 1990 July 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1991 July 1, 1991 Jan. 1, 1992 July 1, 1992 Jan. 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Jan. 1, 1994 July 1, 1994 Jan. 1, 1995 July 1, 1995 Jan. 1, 1996 July 1, 1996 Jan. 1, 1997 July 1, 1997 Jan. 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 Jan. 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 Jan. 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 Jan. 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 Jan. 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 Jan. 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 Jan. 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 Jan. 1, 2005 July 1, 1980. Jan. 1, 1981. July 1, 1981. Jan. 1, 1982. Jan. 1, 1983. July 1, 1983. Jan. 1, 1984. July 1, 1984. Jan. 1, 1985. July 1, 1985. Jan. 1, 1986. July 1, 1986. Jan. 1. 1987. July 1, 1987. Jan. 1, 1988. July 1, 1988. Jan. 1, 1989. July 1, 1989. Jan. 1, 1990. July 1, 1990. Jan. 1, 1991. July 1, 1991. Jan. 1, 1992. July 1, 1992. Jan. 1, 1993. July 1, 1993. Jan. 1, 1994. July 1, 1994. Jan. 1, 1995. July 1, 1995. Jan. 1, 1996. July 1, 1996. Jan. 1, 1997. July 1, 1997. Jan. 1, 1998. July 1, 1998. Jan. 1, 1999. July 1, 1999. Jan. 1, 2000. July 1, 2000. Jan. 1, 2001. July 1, 2001. Jan. 1, 2002. July 1, 2002. Jan. 1, 2003. July 1, 2003. Jan. 1, 2004. July 1, 2004. Jan. 1, 2005. July 1, 2005. VerDate Aug<18>2005 15:05 Sep 06, 2005 Jkt 205001 Effective interest rate On or after Prior to 41⁄2 ............... July 1, 2005 Jan. 1, 2006. Section 215 of Title II of Division G of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004 (Pub. L. 108–199, approved January 23, 2004) amended section 224 of the Act, to change the debenture interest rate for purposes of calculating certain insurance claim payments made in cash. Therefore, effective immediately, for all claims paid in cash on mortgages insured under section 203 or 234 of the National Housing Act and endorsed for insurance after January 23, 2004, the debenture interest rate will be the monthly average yield, for the month in which the default on the mortgage occurred, on United States Treasury Securities adjusted to a constant maturity of 10 years, as found in Federal Reserve Statistical Release H– 15. The FHA is in the process of making conforming amendments to applicable regulations to fully implement this recent change to section 224 of the Act. Section 221(g)(4) of the Act provides that debentures issued pursuant to that paragraph (with respect to the assignment of an insured mortgage to the Secretary) will bear interest at the ‘‘going Federal rate’’ in effect at the time the debentures are issued. The term ‘‘going Federal rate’’ is defined to mean the interest rate that the Secretary of the Treasury determines, pursuant to a statutory formula based on the average yield on all outstanding marketable Treasury obligations of 8- to 12-year maturities, for the 6-month periods of January through June and July through December of each year. Section 221(g)(4) is implemented in the HUD regulations at 24 CFR 221.255 and 24 CFR 221.790. The Secretary of the Treasury has determined that the interest rate to be borne by debentures issued pursuant to section 221(g)(4) during the 6-month period beginning July 1, 2005, is 47⁄8 percent. HUD expects to publish its next notice of change in debenture interest rates in January 2006. The subject matter of this notice falls within the categorical exemption from HUD’s environmental clearance procedures set forth in 24 CFR 50.19(c)(6). For that reason, no environmental finding has been prepared for this notice. (Authority: Sections 211, 221, 224, National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. 1715b, 1715l, 1715o; Section 7(d), Department of HUD Act, 42 U.S.C. 3535(d)). PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: August 26, 2005. Brian D. Montgomery, Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing Commissioner. [FR Doc. 05–17729 Filed 9–6–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–27–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Safe Harbor Agreement and Receipt of Application for an Enhancement of Survival Permit Associated With the Restoration of Habitat and Reintroduction of Utah Prairie Dogs on Private Land in Sevier County, UT Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Mr. Mitchel Pace (Applicant/ Cooperator) has applied to the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for an Enhancement of Survival Permit (ESP) for the Utah prairie dog pursuant to section 10(a)1(A) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), as amended (Act). This permit application includes a proposed Safe Harbor Agreement (SHA) between the Applicant and the Service. The proposed SHA and permit would become effective upon signature of the SHA and would remain in effect for 25 years. This notice is provided pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), section 10 of the Act, and the Service’s Safe Harbor Policy (64 FR 32717). The Service requests information, views, and opinions from the public via this notice. Further, the Service is soliciting information regarding the adequacy of the SHA as measured against the Service’s Safe Harbor Policy and the regulations that implement it. DATES: Written comments on the permit application must be received on or before October 7, 2005. ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review the proposed SHA and the permit application may obtain copies by writing the Service’s Mountain-Prairie Regional Office, Denver, Colorado. Documents also will be available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 134 Union Boulevard, Lakewood, Colorado 80228–1807, or the Utah Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2369 West Orton Circle, West Valley City, Utah 84119. Written data or comments concerning the proposed SHA and/or permit application must be submitted to the Regional Office and must be in E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 7, 2005 / Notices writing to be processed. Comments must be submitted in writing to be adequately considered in the Service’s decisionmaking process. Please reference permit number TE–106063 in your comments, or in the request for the documents discussed herein. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pat Mehlhop, Regional Safe Harbor Coordinator (see ADDRESSES), telephone (303) 236–4215, or Henry Maddux, Utah Field Supervisor (see ADDRESSES), telephone (801) 975–3330. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Utah prairie dog is the westernmost member of the genus Cynomys. The species’ range, which is limited to the southwestern quarter of Utah, is the most restricted of all prairie dog species in the United States. Distribution of the Utah prairie dog has been greatly reduced due to disease (plague), poisoning, drought, and human-related habitat alteration. Protection of this species and enhancement of its habitat on private land will benefit recovery efforts. The primary objective of this proposed SHA is to implement voluntary conservation measures to benefit the species and the landowner. Through this agreement, the landowner will receive relief from any section 9 liability under the Act beyond that which exists at the time the agreement is signed (‘‘regulatory baseline’’). The private land immediately to the south of the property contains an active Utah prairie dog colony approximately 2 hectares (5 acres) in size. This colony abuts the fence line, but does not extend onto the property to be addressed in the proposed SHA due to unsuitable habitat. To benefit the Utah prairie dog, foraging and visual surveillance habitat will be enhanced by thinning decadent stands of brush and by increasing forage quantity and quality using mechanical and herbicidal treatments and reseeding native grasses and forbs. The habitat improvements will be maintained throughout the term of the permit through managed grazing, additional brush treatments if necessary, and to some degree by the Utah prairie dogs themselves. The Cooperator will receive an ESP that authorizes incidental take of the covered species above the Cooperator’s baseline responsibilities, as defined in the SHA. The Service has evaluated the impacts of this action under the NEPA and determined that it warrants categorical exclusion as described 516 DM 6, Appendix 1, section 1.4 C.(1). The Service will evaluate whether the issuance of the ESP complies with section 7 of the Act by conducting an VerDate Aug<18>2005 15:05 Sep 06, 2005 Jkt 205001 intra-Service section 7 consultation on the issuance of the permit. The result of the biological opinion, in combination with the above finding and any public comments will be used in the final analysis to determine whether or not to issue the requested ESP, pursuant to the regulations that guide issuance of the type of permit. Authority: The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Dated: July 26, 2005. Elliott N. Sutta, Regional Director, Denver, Colorado. [FR Doc. 05–17668 Filed 9–6–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Receipt of Four Applications for Incidental Take Permits for Construction of Single-Family Homes in Brevard County, FL Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Eugene T. Butler, Carlos E. Gauthier, Robert Moren, and Kheino A. Phidd (Applicants) individually request an incidental take permit (ITP) pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), as amended (Act). The Applicants anticipate taking a combined total of about 1.03 acres of Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) (scrub-jay) foraging, sheltering, and possibly nesting habitat incidental to lot preparation for the construction of single-family homes and supporting infrastructure in Brevard County, Florida (Projects). Requested permit duration is one year for all applicants, except for Moren, who requests a 10year permit term. The destruction of 1.03 acre of foraging, sheltering, and possibly nesting habitat is expected to result in the take of three families of scrub-jays. Each of the Applicants’ Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) describe the mitigation and minimization measures proposed to address the effects of the proposed Project to the Florida scrubjay. These measures are outlined in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. We have determined that each Applicant’s proposal, including the proposed mitigation and minimization measures, will individually and cumulatively have a minor or negligible PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 53243 effect on the species covered in the HCPs. Therefore, the ITPs are ‘‘loweffect’’ projects and qualify as categorical exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as provided by the Department of Interior Manual (516 DM 2, Appendix 1 and 516 DM 6, Appendix 1). We announce the availability of the HCPs for the incidental take applications. Copies of the HCPs may be obtained by making a request to the Regional Office (see ADDRESSES). Requests must be in writing to be processed. This notice is provided pursuant to Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). DATES: Written comments on the ITP applications and HCPs should be sent to the Service’s Regional Office (see ADDRESSES) and should be received on or before October 7, 2005. ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review the applications and HCPs may obtain a copy by writing the Service’s Southeast Regional Office, Atlanta, Georgia. Please reference permit number TE099682–0, for Butler, number TE099683–0, for Gauthier, number TE099684–0, for Moren, and number TE099685–0, for Phidd, in such requests. Documents will also be available for public inspection by appointment during normal business hours at the Regional Office, 1875 Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30345 (Attn: Endangered Species Permits), or Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 6620 Southpoint Drive South, Suite 310, Jacksonville, Florida 32216–0912. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Dell, Regional HCP Coordinator, (see ADDRESSES above), telephone: 404/ 679–7313, facsimile: 404/679–7081; or Ms. Paula Sisson, General Biologist, Jacksonville Field Office, Jacksonville, Florida (see ADDRESSES above), telephone: 904/232–2580, ext. 126. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you wish to comment, you may submit comments by any one of several methods. Please reference permit number TE099682–0, for Butler, number TE099683–0, for Gauthier, number TE099684–0, for Moren, and number TE099685–0, for Phidd, in such comments. You may mail comments to the Service’s Regional Office (see ADDRESSES). You may also comment via the Internet to https://www.david_dell@fws.gov. Please submit comments over the internet as an ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters and any form of encryption. Please also include your name and return address in your internet message. If you do not receive a confirmation from us that we have received your E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53242-53243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17668]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Safe Harbor Agreement and Receipt of Application for an 
Enhancement of Survival Permit Associated With the Restoration of 
Habitat and Reintroduction of Utah Prairie Dogs on Private Land in 
Sevier County, UT

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Mr. Mitchel Pace (Applicant/Cooperator) has applied to the 
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for an Enhancement of Survival 
Permit (ESP) for the Utah prairie dog pursuant to section 10(a)1(A) of 
the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), as amended 
(Act). This permit application includes a proposed Safe Harbor 
Agreement (SHA) between the Applicant and the Service. The proposed SHA 
and permit would become effective upon signature of the SHA and would 
remain in effect for 25 years. This notice is provided pursuant to the 
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), section 10 of the Act, and 
the Service's Safe Harbor Policy (64 FR 32717). The Service requests 
information, views, and opinions from the public via this notice. 
Further, the Service is soliciting information regarding the adequacy 
of the SHA as measured against the Service's Safe Harbor Policy and the 
regulations that implement it.

DATES: Written comments on the permit application must be received on 
or before October 7, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review the proposed SHA and the permit 
application may obtain copies by writing the Service's Mountain-Prairie 
Regional Office, Denver, Colorado. Documents also will be available for 
public inspection during normal business hours at the Regional Office, 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 134 Union Boulevard, Lakewood, Colorado 
80228-1807, or the Utah Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
2369 West Orton Circle, West Valley City, Utah 84119. Written data or 
comments concerning the proposed SHA and/or permit application must be 
submitted to the Regional Office and must be in

[[Page 53243]]

writing to be processed. Comments must be submitted in writing to be 
adequately considered in the Service's decision-making process. Please 
reference permit number TE-106063 in your comments, or in the request 
for the documents discussed herein.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pat Mehlhop, Regional Safe Harbor 
Coordinator (see ADDRESSES), telephone (303) 236-4215, or Henry Maddux, 
Utah Field Supervisor (see ADDRESSES), telephone (801) 975-3330.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Utah prairie dog is the westernmost 
member of the genus Cynomys. The species' range, which is limited to 
the southwestern quarter of Utah, is the most restricted of all prairie 
dog species in the United States. Distribution of the Utah prairie dog 
has been greatly reduced due to disease (plague), poisoning, drought, 
and human-related habitat alteration. Protection of this species and 
enhancement of its habitat on private land will benefit recovery 
efforts.
    The primary objective of this proposed SHA is to implement 
voluntary conservation measures to benefit the species and the 
landowner. Through this agreement, the landowner will receive relief 
from any section 9 liability under the Act beyond that which exists at 
the time the agreement is signed (``regulatory baseline''). The private 
land immediately to the south of the property contains an active Utah 
prairie dog colony approximately 2 hectares (5 acres) in size. This 
colony abuts the fence line, but does not extend onto the property to 
be addressed in the proposed SHA due to unsuitable habitat. To benefit 
the Utah prairie dog, foraging and visual surveillance habitat will be 
enhanced by thinning decadent stands of brush and by increasing forage 
quantity and quality using mechanical and herbicidal treatments and 
reseeding native grasses and forbs. The habitat improvements will be 
maintained throughout the term of the permit through managed grazing, 
additional brush treatments if necessary, and to some degree by the 
Utah prairie dogs themselves. The Cooperator will receive an ESP that 
authorizes incidental take of the covered species above the 
Cooperator's baseline responsibilities, as defined in the SHA.
    The Service has evaluated the impacts of this action under the NEPA 
and determined that it warrants categorical exclusion as described 516 
DM 6, Appendix 1, section 1.4 C.(1). The Service will evaluate whether 
the issuance of the ESP complies with section 7 of the Act by 
conducting an intra-Service section 7 consultation on the issuance of 
the permit. The result of the biological opinion, in combination with 
the above finding and any public comments will be used in the final 
analysis to determine whether or not to issue the requested ESP, 
pursuant to the regulations that guide issuance of the type of permit.

    Authority: The authority for this action is the Endangered 
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 
4321 et seq.).

    Dated: July 26, 2005.
Elliott N. Sutta,
Regional Director, Denver, Colorado.
[FR Doc. 05-17668 Filed 9-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.