Safe Harbor Agreement and Receipt of Application for an Enhancement of Survival Permit Associated With the Restoration of Habitat and Reintroduction of Utah Prairie Dogs on Private Land in Sevier County, UT, 53242-53243 [05-17668]
Download as PDF
53242
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 7, 2005 / Notices
statutory maximum interest rate for the
period beginning July 1, 2005, is 41⁄2
percent; and (2) has approved the
establishment of the debenture interest
rate by the Secretary of HUD at 41⁄2
percent for the 6-month period
beginning July 1, 2005. This interest rate
will be the rate borne by debentures
issued with respect to any insured loan
or mortgage (except for debentures
issued pursuant to section 221(g)(4))
with insurance commitment or
endorsement date (as applicable) within
the latter 6 months of 2005.
For convenience of reference, HUD is
publishing the following chart of
debenture interest rates applicable to
mortgages committed or endorsed since
January 1, 1980:
Effective
interest
rate
On or after
Prior to
91⁄2 ...............
97⁄8 ...............
113⁄4 .............
127⁄8 .............
123⁄4 .............
101⁄4 .............
103⁄8 .............
111⁄2 .............
133⁄8 .............
115⁄8 .............
111⁄8 .............
101⁄4 .............
81⁄4 ...............
8 ...................
9 ...................
91⁄8 ...............
93⁄8 ...............
91⁄4 ...............
9 ...................
81⁄8 ...............
9 ...................
83⁄4 ...............
81⁄2 ...............
8 ...................
8 ...................
73⁄4 ...............
7 ...................
65⁄8 ...............
73⁄4 ...............
83⁄8 ...............
71⁄4 ...............
61⁄2 ...............
71⁄4 ...............
63⁄4 ...............
71⁄8 ...............
63⁄8 ...............
61⁄8 ...............
51⁄2 ...............
61⁄8 ...............
61⁄2 ...............
61⁄2 ...............
6 ...................
57⁄8 ...............
51⁄4 ...............
53⁄4 ...............
5 ...................
41⁄2 ...............
51⁄8 ...............
51⁄2 ...............
47⁄8 ...............
Jan. 1, 1980
July 1, 1980
Jan. 1, 1981
July 1, 1981
Jan. 1, 1982
Jan. 1, 1983
July 1, 1983
Jan. 1, 1984
July 1, 1984
Jan. 1, 1985
July 1, 1985
Jan. 1, 1986
July 1, 1986
Jan. 1, 1987
July 1, 1987
Jan. 1, 1988
July 1, 1988
Jan. 1, 1989
July 1, 1989
Jan. 1, 1990
July 1, 1990
Jan. 1, 1991
July 1, 1991
Jan. 1, 1992
July 1, 1992
Jan. 1, 1993
July 1, 1993
Jan. 1, 1994
July 1, 1994
Jan. 1, 1995
July 1, 1995
Jan. 1, 1996
July 1, 1996
Jan. 1, 1997
July 1, 1997
Jan. 1, 1998
July 1, 1998
Jan. 1, 1999
July 1, 1999
Jan. 1, 2000
July 1, 2000
Jan. 1, 2001
July 1, 2001
Jan. 1, 2002
July 1, 2002
Jan. 1, 2003
July 1, 2003
Jan. 1, 2004
July 1, 2004
Jan. 1, 2005
July 1, 1980.
Jan. 1, 1981.
July 1, 1981.
Jan. 1, 1982.
Jan. 1, 1983.
July 1, 1983.
Jan. 1, 1984.
July 1, 1984.
Jan. 1, 1985.
July 1, 1985.
Jan. 1, 1986.
July 1, 1986.
Jan. 1. 1987.
July 1, 1987.
Jan. 1, 1988.
July 1, 1988.
Jan. 1, 1989.
July 1, 1989.
Jan. 1, 1990.
July 1, 1990.
Jan. 1, 1991.
July 1, 1991.
Jan. 1, 1992.
July 1, 1992.
Jan. 1, 1993.
July 1, 1993.
Jan. 1, 1994.
July 1, 1994.
Jan. 1, 1995.
July 1, 1995.
Jan. 1, 1996.
July 1, 1996.
Jan. 1, 1997.
July 1, 1997.
Jan. 1, 1998.
July 1, 1998.
Jan. 1, 1999.
July 1, 1999.
Jan. 1, 2000.
July 1, 2000.
Jan. 1, 2001.
July 1, 2001.
Jan. 1, 2002.
July 1, 2002.
Jan. 1, 2003.
July 1, 2003.
Jan. 1, 2004.
July 1, 2004.
Jan. 1, 2005.
July 1, 2005.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:05 Sep 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
Effective
interest
rate
On or after
Prior to
41⁄2 ...............
July 1, 2005
Jan. 1, 2006.
Section 215 of Title II of Division G
of the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2004 (Pub. L. 108–199, approved
January 23, 2004) amended section 224
of the Act, to change the debenture
interest rate for purposes of calculating
certain insurance claim payments made
in cash. Therefore, effective
immediately, for all claims paid in cash
on mortgages insured under section 203
or 234 of the National Housing Act and
endorsed for insurance after January 23,
2004, the debenture interest rate will be
the monthly average yield, for the
month in which the default on the
mortgage occurred, on United States
Treasury Securities adjusted to a
constant maturity of 10 years, as found
in Federal Reserve Statistical Release H–
15. The FHA is in the process of making
conforming amendments to applicable
regulations to fully implement this
recent change to section 224 of the Act.
Section 221(g)(4) of the Act provides
that debentures issued pursuant to that
paragraph (with respect to the
assignment of an insured mortgage to
the Secretary) will bear interest at the
‘‘going Federal rate’’ in effect at the time
the debentures are issued. The term
‘‘going Federal rate’’ is defined to mean
the interest rate that the Secretary of the
Treasury determines, pursuant to a
statutory formula based on the average
yield on all outstanding marketable
Treasury obligations of 8- to 12-year
maturities, for the 6-month periods of
January through June and July through
December of each year. Section 221(g)(4)
is implemented in the HUD regulations
at 24 CFR 221.255 and 24 CFR 221.790.
The Secretary of the Treasury has
determined that the interest rate to be
borne by debentures issued pursuant to
section 221(g)(4) during the 6-month
period beginning July 1, 2005, is 47⁄8
percent.
HUD expects to publish its next
notice of change in debenture interest
rates in January 2006.
The subject matter of this notice falls
within the categorical exemption from
HUD’s environmental clearance
procedures set forth in 24 CFR
50.19(c)(6). For that reason, no
environmental finding has been
prepared for this notice.
(Authority: Sections 211, 221, 224, National
Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. 1715b, 1715l, 1715o;
Section 7(d), Department of HUD Act, 42
U.S.C. 3535(d)).
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: August 26, 2005.
Brian D. Montgomery,
Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 05–17729 Filed 9–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–27–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Safe Harbor Agreement and Receipt of
Application for an Enhancement of
Survival Permit Associated With the
Restoration of Habitat and
Reintroduction of Utah Prairie Dogs on
Private Land in Sevier County, UT
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Mr. Mitchel Pace (Applicant/
Cooperator) has applied to the Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) for an
Enhancement of Survival Permit (ESP)
for the Utah prairie dog pursuant to
section 10(a)1(A) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.), as amended (Act). This permit
application includes a proposed Safe
Harbor Agreement (SHA) between the
Applicant and the Service. The
proposed SHA and permit would
become effective upon signature of the
SHA and would remain in effect for 25
years. This notice is provided pursuant
to the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), section 10 of the Act, and
the Service’s Safe Harbor Policy (64 FR
32717). The Service requests
information, views, and opinions from
the public via this notice. Further, the
Service is soliciting information
regarding the adequacy of the SHA as
measured against the Service’s Safe
Harbor Policy and the regulations that
implement it.
DATES: Written comments on the permit
application must be received on or
before October 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review
the proposed SHA and the permit
application may obtain copies by
writing the Service’s Mountain-Prairie
Regional Office, Denver, Colorado.
Documents also will be available for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Regional Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 134
Union Boulevard, Lakewood, Colorado
80228–1807, or the Utah Field Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2369
West Orton Circle, West Valley City,
Utah 84119. Written data or comments
concerning the proposed SHA and/or
permit application must be submitted to
the Regional Office and must be in
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 7, 2005 / Notices
writing to be processed. Comments must
be submitted in writing to be adequately
considered in the Service’s decisionmaking process. Please reference permit
number TE–106063 in your comments,
or in the request for the documents
discussed herein.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pat
Mehlhop, Regional Safe Harbor
Coordinator (see ADDRESSES), telephone
(303) 236–4215, or Henry Maddux, Utah
Field Supervisor (see ADDRESSES),
telephone (801) 975–3330.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Utah
prairie dog is the westernmost member
of the genus Cynomys. The species’
range, which is limited to the
southwestern quarter of Utah, is the
most restricted of all prairie dog species
in the United States. Distribution of the
Utah prairie dog has been greatly
reduced due to disease (plague),
poisoning, drought, and human-related
habitat alteration. Protection of this
species and enhancement of its habitat
on private land will benefit recovery
efforts.
The primary objective of this
proposed SHA is to implement
voluntary conservation measures to
benefit the species and the landowner.
Through this agreement, the landowner
will receive relief from any section 9
liability under the Act beyond that
which exists at the time the agreement
is signed (‘‘regulatory baseline’’). The
private land immediately to the south of
the property contains an active Utah
prairie dog colony approximately 2
hectares (5 acres) in size. This colony
abuts the fence line, but does not extend
onto the property to be addressed in the
proposed SHA due to unsuitable
habitat. To benefit the Utah prairie dog,
foraging and visual surveillance habitat
will be enhanced by thinning decadent
stands of brush and by increasing forage
quantity and quality using mechanical
and herbicidal treatments and reseeding
native grasses and forbs. The habitat
improvements will be maintained
throughout the term of the permit
through managed grazing, additional
brush treatments if necessary, and to
some degree by the Utah prairie dogs
themselves. The Cooperator will receive
an ESP that authorizes incidental take of
the covered species above the
Cooperator’s baseline responsibilities, as
defined in the SHA.
The Service has evaluated the impacts
of this action under the NEPA and
determined that it warrants categorical
exclusion as described 516 DM 6,
Appendix 1, section 1.4 C.(1). The
Service will evaluate whether the
issuance of the ESP complies with
section 7 of the Act by conducting an
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:05 Sep 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
intra-Service section 7 consultation on
the issuance of the permit. The result of
the biological opinion, in combination
with the above finding and any public
comments will be used in the final
analysis to determine whether or not to
issue the requested ESP, pursuant to the
regulations that guide issuance of the
type of permit.
Authority: The authority for this action is
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969,
as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Dated: July 26, 2005.
Elliott N. Sutta,
Regional Director, Denver, Colorado.
[FR Doc. 05–17668 Filed 9–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Receipt of Four Applications for
Incidental Take Permits for
Construction of Single-Family Homes
in Brevard County, FL
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Eugene T. Butler, Carlos E.
Gauthier, Robert Moren, and Kheino A.
Phidd (Applicants) individually request
an incidental take permit (ITP) pursuant
to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.), as amended (Act). The Applicants
anticipate taking a combined total of
about 1.03 acres of Florida scrub-jay
(Aphelocoma coerulescens) (scrub-jay)
foraging, sheltering, and possibly
nesting habitat incidental to lot
preparation for the construction of
single-family homes and supporting
infrastructure in Brevard County,
Florida (Projects). Requested permit
duration is one year for all applicants,
except for Moren, who requests a 10year permit term. The destruction of
1.03 acre of foraging, sheltering, and
possibly nesting habitat is expected to
result in the take of three families of
scrub-jays.
Each of the Applicants’ Habitat
Conservation Plans (HCPs) describe the
mitigation and minimization measures
proposed to address the effects of the
proposed Project to the Florida scrubjay. These measures are outlined in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. We have determined that each
Applicant’s proposal, including the
proposed mitigation and minimization
measures, will individually and
cumulatively have a minor or negligible
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53243
effect on the species covered in the
HCPs. Therefore, the ITPs are ‘‘loweffect’’ projects and qualify as
categorical exclusions under the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), as provided by the Department
of Interior Manual (516 DM 2, Appendix
1 and 516 DM 6, Appendix 1). We
announce the availability of the HCPs
for the incidental take applications.
Copies of the HCPs may be obtained by
making a request to the Regional Office
(see ADDRESSES). Requests must be in
writing to be processed. This notice is
provided pursuant to Section 10 of the
Endangered Species Act and NEPA
regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
DATES: Written comments on the ITP
applications and HCPs should be sent to
the Service’s Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES) and should be received on
or before October 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review
the applications and HCPs may obtain a
copy by writing the Service’s Southeast
Regional Office, Atlanta, Georgia. Please
reference permit number TE099682–0,
for Butler, number TE099683–0, for
Gauthier, number TE099684–0, for
Moren, and number TE099685–0, for
Phidd, in such requests. Documents will
also be available for public inspection
by appointment during normal business
hours at the Regional Office, 1875
Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta,
Georgia 30345 (Attn: Endangered
Species Permits), or Field Supervisor,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 6620
Southpoint Drive South, Suite 310,
Jacksonville, Florida 32216–0912.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David Dell, Regional HCP Coordinator,
(see ADDRESSES above), telephone: 404/
679–7313, facsimile: 404/679–7081; or
Ms. Paula Sisson, General Biologist,
Jacksonville Field Office, Jacksonville,
Florida (see ADDRESSES above),
telephone: 904/232–2580, ext. 126.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you
wish to comment, you may submit
comments by any one of several
methods. Please reference permit
number TE099682–0, for Butler, number
TE099683–0, for Gauthier, number
TE099684–0, for Moren, and number
TE099685–0, for Phidd, in such
comments. You may mail comments to
the Service’s Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES). You may also comment via
the Internet to
https://www.david_dell@fws.gov. Please
submit comments over the internet as an
ASCII file, avoiding the use of special
characters and any form of encryption.
Please also include your name and
return address in your internet message.
If you do not receive a confirmation
from us that we have received your
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53242-53243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17668]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Safe Harbor Agreement and Receipt of Application for an
Enhancement of Survival Permit Associated With the Restoration of
Habitat and Reintroduction of Utah Prairie Dogs on Private Land in
Sevier County, UT
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Mr. Mitchel Pace (Applicant/Cooperator) has applied to the
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for an Enhancement of Survival
Permit (ESP) for the Utah prairie dog pursuant to section 10(a)1(A) of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), as amended
(Act). This permit application includes a proposed Safe Harbor
Agreement (SHA) between the Applicant and the Service. The proposed SHA
and permit would become effective upon signature of the SHA and would
remain in effect for 25 years. This notice is provided pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), section 10 of the Act, and
the Service's Safe Harbor Policy (64 FR 32717). The Service requests
information, views, and opinions from the public via this notice.
Further, the Service is soliciting information regarding the adequacy
of the SHA as measured against the Service's Safe Harbor Policy and the
regulations that implement it.
DATES: Written comments on the permit application must be received on
or before October 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review the proposed SHA and the permit
application may obtain copies by writing the Service's Mountain-Prairie
Regional Office, Denver, Colorado. Documents also will be available for
public inspection during normal business hours at the Regional Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 134 Union Boulevard, Lakewood, Colorado
80228-1807, or the Utah Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
2369 West Orton Circle, West Valley City, Utah 84119. Written data or
comments concerning the proposed SHA and/or permit application must be
submitted to the Regional Office and must be in
[[Page 53243]]
writing to be processed. Comments must be submitted in writing to be
adequately considered in the Service's decision-making process. Please
reference permit number TE-106063 in your comments, or in the request
for the documents discussed herein.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pat Mehlhop, Regional Safe Harbor
Coordinator (see ADDRESSES), telephone (303) 236-4215, or Henry Maddux,
Utah Field Supervisor (see ADDRESSES), telephone (801) 975-3330.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Utah prairie dog is the westernmost
member of the genus Cynomys. The species' range, which is limited to
the southwestern quarter of Utah, is the most restricted of all prairie
dog species in the United States. Distribution of the Utah prairie dog
has been greatly reduced due to disease (plague), poisoning, drought,
and human-related habitat alteration. Protection of this species and
enhancement of its habitat on private land will benefit recovery
efforts.
The primary objective of this proposed SHA is to implement
voluntary conservation measures to benefit the species and the
landowner. Through this agreement, the landowner will receive relief
from any section 9 liability under the Act beyond that which exists at
the time the agreement is signed (``regulatory baseline''). The private
land immediately to the south of the property contains an active Utah
prairie dog colony approximately 2 hectares (5 acres) in size. This
colony abuts the fence line, but does not extend onto the property to
be addressed in the proposed SHA due to unsuitable habitat. To benefit
the Utah prairie dog, foraging and visual surveillance habitat will be
enhanced by thinning decadent stands of brush and by increasing forage
quantity and quality using mechanical and herbicidal treatments and
reseeding native grasses and forbs. The habitat improvements will be
maintained throughout the term of the permit through managed grazing,
additional brush treatments if necessary, and to some degree by the
Utah prairie dogs themselves. The Cooperator will receive an ESP that
authorizes incidental take of the covered species above the
Cooperator's baseline responsibilities, as defined in the SHA.
The Service has evaluated the impacts of this action under the NEPA
and determined that it warrants categorical exclusion as described 516
DM 6, Appendix 1, section 1.4 C.(1). The Service will evaluate whether
the issuance of the ESP complies with section 7 of the Act by
conducting an intra-Service section 7 consultation on the issuance of
the permit. The result of the biological opinion, in combination with
the above finding and any public comments will be used in the final
analysis to determine whether or not to issue the requested ESP,
pursuant to the regulations that guide issuance of the type of permit.
Authority: The authority for this action is the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.).
Dated: July 26, 2005.
Elliott N. Sutta,
Regional Director, Denver, Colorado.
[FR Doc. 05-17668 Filed 9-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P