Pennsylvania Regulatory Program, 52916-52917 [05-17613]
Download as PDF
52916
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 6, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
of the ISO 9001–2000 certification or
certification of compliance with an
equivalent program of quality management
that covers the processes described in this
section of the requirements.
(16) Conversion of NOAA ENC files to
other formats (995.26(a)(1)). Value Added
Distributor asserts that all NOAA ENC
content and accuracy are preserved during
the conversion process as described in this
section of the requirements.
(17) Conversion of NOAA ENC files to
other formats/software certification
(995.26(a)(2)). Value Added Distributor shall
provide a copy of the type approval
certificate for the software used to convert
the NOAA ENC files to the Value Added
Distributor’s format.
(18) Conversion of NOAA ENC files to
other formats/error reporting (995.26(a)(3)).
Value Added Distributor asserts that they
shall log and report any errors in the NOAA
ENC data detected during the conversion
process. Value Added Distributor shall
provide an example of the report format that
they will use.
(19) Conversion of NOAA ENC files to
other formats/format check (995.26(a)(4)).
Value Added Distributor asserts that all data
shall be checked for conformance with Value
Added Distributor’s own format
specifications and shall test load the
converted data as described in this section of
the requirements.
(20) Format validation software testing
(995.27). The validation software used by
Value Added Distributor shall be tested
according to this requirement and the results
stated in this section of the request for
certification.
(21) Use of NOAA emblem (995.28). Value
Added Distributor acknowledges that a
separate request for the use of the NOAA
emblem must be submitted according to the
procedure described in this requirement.
(22) Limitation on endorsements (995.29).
Value Added Distributor acknowledges that
NOAA does not automatically, directly, or
indirectly endorse any product or service
provided, or to be provided, by Value Added
Distributor, its successors, assignees, or
licensees. Value Added Distributor shall not
in any way imply that this certification is an
endorsement of any such product or service
without separate, written permission.
(23) Liability (995.7). By signing this
request for certification, Value Added
Distributor pledges to indemnify and hold
harmless the U.S. Government for any loss,
claim, damage, or liability of any kind, the
extent caused by the negligence of Value
Added Distributor or its employees, arising
out of the use by the Value Added
Distributor, or any party acting on its behalf
or under its authorization, of NOAA ENC
data.
Signature of this request constitutes an
acknowledgement by Value Added
Distributor of ALL applicable terms and
conditions described in the certification
requirements.
Signed: lllllllllllllllll
Title: llllllllllllllllll
Date: llllllllllllllllll
VerDate Aug<18>2005
11:56 Sep 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
Dated: August 9, 2005.
Richard W. Spinrad,
Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services
and Coastal Zone Management, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–16033 Filed 9–2–05; 8:45 am]
30 CFR Part 938
released in whole or in part at Stage 3
when the operator has completed
successfully all mining and reclamation
activities and has made provisions with
PADEP for the sound future treatment of
any pollutional discharges.’’
Accordingly, we decided to clarify our
finding in support of the decision in this
regard. This clarification is limited to an
expansion of this finding only, and does
not change or otherwise affect our
decision to aprove Section 4(g)(3). We
are expanding the finding related to
Section 4(g)(3) to read:
*
*
*
*
*
[PA–124–FOR]
PASMCRA
Pennsylvania Regulatory Program
*
BILLING CODE 3510–JE–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; clarification.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) is
clarifying its decision with respect to
one section of an amendment to the
Pennsylvania regulatory program
(Pennsylvania program) under the
Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The
amendment concerned revisions to the
Pennsylvania Surface Mining
Conservation and Reclamation Act
(PASMCRA) and implementing
regulations at 25 Pa. Code Chapters 86–
90 with regard to various issues
including bonding, remining and
reclamation, postmining discharges, and
water supply protection/replacement.
We approved this amendment, with
certain exceptions, in a final rule
published in the Federal Register on
May 13, 2005 (70 FR 25472–25491).
This clarification supplements a
previous finding made in Section III.
OSM’s Findings. However, it does not
change or otherwise affect our decision
made in Section V. OSM’s Decision.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 6, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Rieger, Director, Pittsburgh Field
Division, Telephone: (717) 782–4036,
e-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In our
May 13, 2005, decision, we approved,
among other provisions, Section 4(g)(3)
of PASMCRA, pertaining to Stage 3
bond release (70 FR at 25491). Our
finding with respect to Section 4(g)(3) is
on page 25474, Col. 2, the first complete
paragraph and the ensuing three
paragraphs. After publication, a member
of the public pointed out a possible
ambiguity with respect to our finding in
support of approving the phrase, ‘‘the
remaining portion of the bond could be
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
Section 4(g)(3) was modified to
expressly indicate that the remaining
portion of the bond could be released in
whole or part at Stage 3 when the
operator has completed successfully all
mining and reclamation activities and
has made provisions with PADEP for
the sound future treatment of any
pollutional discharges. That portion of
the permit required for post-mining
water treatment remains under bond as
part of the provisions for future
treatment of any pollutional discharges.
Therefore, this is a form of partial bond
release as provided for in 30 CFR
800.40(c) and can be approved.
The Federal regulations do not allow
full bond release until all requirements
of the State program and the permit
have been met. However, Pennsylvania
has made clear in its comments on this
amendment that the reference to the
‘‘whole’’ bond that can be released
actually refers to the original bond. That
original, standard bond can be fully
released at Stage 3 where it is replaced
by another approved financial
instrument, such as a trust fund as a
collateral bond that will fully secure the
long-term water treatment obligation.
This method, which uses a collateral
bond, is the ‘‘provision’’ for ‘‘sound
future of any pollutional discharges.’’
Additionally, Pennsylvania’s
regulations at 25 Pa. Code 86.151(j),
which provides that release of bonds
does not alleviate the operator’s
responsibility to treat discharge of mine
drainage emanating from, or
hydrologically connected to, the site to
the standards in the permit, PASMCRA,
the Clean Stream Law, the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act (or Clean
Water Act) and the rules and regulations
thereunder, provides guidance as to
what qualifies as sound future
treatment. Based upon Pennsylvania’s
clarification about long term financial
assurance, we construe the references to
‘‘release of bonds’’ in section 86.151(j)
to mean the release of the original bond,
E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM
06SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 6, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
that is replaced by another bond,
whether it be a trust fund or other
financial instrument used as a collateral
bond, that will cover the area and cost
of treatment facilities. Therefore, to the
extent that the reference in section
4(g)(3) to release of the ‘‘whole’’ bond
means the original bond that is replaced
by the new bond in the form of another
financial assurance mechanism, that
reference is approved.
Section 4(g)(3) was also amended by
deleting bond release language
applicable to noncoal surface mining
operations. Since SMCRA contains no
counterpart to this language, the
deletion of the language does not render
the Pennsylvania program inconsistent
with SMCRA or the implementing
Federal regulations.
For the above noted reasons, we are
approving the amendments to Section
4(g)(3).
Dated: July 14, 2005.
Brent Wahlquist,
Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. 05–17613 Filed 9–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–M
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01–05–081]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation
Regulations:Townsend Gut, ME
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
temporarily changing the drawbridge
operation regulations for the operation
of the SR 27 Bridge, at mile 0.7, across
Townsend Gut, between Boothbay
Harbor and Southport, Maine. This
temporary rule allows the bridge to
open at specific times between 6 a.m.
and 8 p.m., after a half-hour advance
notice is given. Additionally, this
temporary rule allows the bridge to
remain closed for nine days, September
19, 2005 through September 27, 2005.
This action is necessary to help
facilitate rehabilitation construction and
painting at the bridge.
DATES: This rule is effective from
September 6, 2005 through November
30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
VerDate Aug<18>2005
17:00 Sep 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
being available in the docket, are part of
docket (CGD01–05–081) and are
available for inspection or copying at
the First Coast Guard District, Bridge
Branch Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue,
Boston, Massachusetts, 02110, between
7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
John W. McDonald, Project Officer, First
Coast Guard District, (617) 223–8364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM.
Additionally, under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this temporary final
rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. The
Coast Guard believes that not publishing
an NPRM and making this final rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication is necessary for the reasons
discussed below, coupled with the fact
that the bridge rehabilitation is
necessary, vital work that must be
performed in order to assure the
continued, safe, and reliable operation
of the bridge. Any delay in the
implementation of this regulation would
not be in the best interest of the public
and public safety.
On January 5, 2005, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Drawbridge Operation
Regulations, Townsend Gut, Maine, in
the Federal Register (70 FR 773). We
received no comments in response to
the notice of proposed rulemaking. No
public hearing was requested and none
was held. Then, on March 16, 2005, we
published a temporary final rule (TFR)
entitled Drawbridge Operation
Regulations, Townsend Gut, Maine, in
the Federal Register (70 FR 12805)
which suspended the existing
regulations and put in place temporary
rules effective until November 30, 2005.
On July 23, 2005, the bridge owner
requested additional regulatory action to
help facilitate the timely completion of
the bridge painting aspect of this
project. The contractor’s progress would
not allow completion of the project on
time before the winter months, which
require painting operations to stop due
to cold temperatures. As a result, the
bridge owner requested that the bridge
remain closed at night from 8 p.m.
through 6 a.m. to allow the contractor
uninterrupted time to complete the
bridge repairs and painting. However,
before we could publish the requested
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52917
change to the temporary regulation the
bridge owner again changed their
request. The bridge owner advised the
Coast Guard that the night closure plan
would not work due to known adverse
public response to nighttime operations.
As a result of the late notice from the
bridge owner and the necessity to
complete vital repairs, the Coast Guard
is now revising the current rules to
allow the bridge to open less frequently
during the daytime.
Background and Purpose
The SR 27 Bridge has a vertical
clearance of 10 feet at mean high water,
and 19 feet at mean low water in the
closed position. The permanent
drawbridge operating regulations at 33
CFR 117.5, which were suspended from
March 14, 2005 through November 30,
2005, require the bridge to open on
signal at all times.
On January 5, 2005, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Drawbridge Operation
Regulations, Townsend Gut, Maine, in
the Federal Register (70 FR 773). We
received no comments in response to
the notice of proposed rulemaking. No
public hearing was requested and none
was held.
On March 16, 2005, we published a
temporary final rule (TFR) entitled
Drawbridge Operation Regulations,
Townsend Gut, Maine, in the Federal
Register (70 FR 12805).
On July 23, 2005, the bridge owner
requested additional regulatory action to
help facilitate the timely completion of
the bridge painting portion of this
project. The contractor’s progress would
not allow completion of the project
before the winter months when painting
operations are not possible due to cold
temperatures. As a result, the Coast
Guard is revising the current temporary
rules to allow the bridge to open less
frequently during the daytime. A halfhour advance notice will be required to
allow the construction workers
sufficient time to clear the bridge before
each bridge opening. Under this
temporary rule the bridge will open
during the daytime at 6 a.m., 12 p.m.,
6 p.m. and 8 p.m., after a half-hour
notice is given by calling the number
posted at the bridge. At all other times
from 8 p.m. until 6 a.m., the bridge will
open on signal.
In order to facilitate necessary repairs,
the bridge owner requested a nine-day
bridge closure from September 19, 2005
through September 27, 2005. Therefore,
in addition to the 4 closure periods
identified in the March 16, 2005
temporary final rule, which have
already occurred, the bridge will be
closed from September 19, 2005 through
E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM
06SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 6, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52916-52917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17613]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 938
[PA-124-FOR]
Pennsylvania Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; clarification.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM)
is clarifying its decision with respect to one section of an amendment
to the Pennsylvania regulatory program (Pennsylvania program) under the
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The
amendment concerned revisions to the Pennsylvania Surface Mining
Conservation and Reclamation Act (PASMCRA) and implementing regulations
at 25 Pa. Code Chapters 86-90 with regard to various issues including
bonding, remining and reclamation, postmining discharges, and water
supply protection/replacement. We approved this amendment, with certain
exceptions, in a final rule published in the Federal Register on May
13, 2005 (70 FR 25472-25491). This clarification supplements a previous
finding made in Section III. OSM's Findings. However, it does not
change or otherwise affect our decision made in Section V. OSM's
Decision.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 6, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Rieger, Director, Pittsburgh
Field Division, Telephone: (717) 782-4036, e-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In our May 13, 2005, decision, we approved,
among other provisions, Section 4(g)(3) of PASMCRA, pertaining to Stage
3 bond release (70 FR at 25491). Our finding with respect to Section
4(g)(3) is on page 25474, Col. 2, the first complete paragraph and the
ensuing three paragraphs. After publication, a member of the public
pointed out a possible ambiguity with respect to our finding in support
of approving the phrase, ``the remaining portion of the bond could be
released in whole or in part at Stage 3 when the operator has completed
successfully all mining and reclamation activities and has made
provisions with PADEP for the sound future treatment of any pollutional
discharges.'' Accordingly, we decided to clarify our finding in support
of the decision in this regard. This clarification is limited to an
expansion of this finding only, and does not change or otherwise affect
our decision to aprove Section 4(g)(3). We are expanding the finding
related to Section 4(g)(3) to read:
* * * * *
PASMCRA
* * * * *
Section 4(g)(3) was modified to expressly indicate that the
remaining portion of the bond could be released in whole or part at
Stage 3 when the operator has completed successfully all mining and
reclamation activities and has made provisions with PADEP for the sound
future treatment of any pollutional discharges. That portion of the
permit required for post-mining water treatment remains under bond as
part of the provisions for future treatment of any pollutional
discharges. Therefore, this is a form of partial bond release as
provided for in 30 CFR 800.40(c) and can be approved.
The Federal regulations do not allow full bond release until all
requirements of the State program and the permit have been met.
However, Pennsylvania has made clear in its comments on this amendment
that the reference to the ``whole'' bond that can be released actually
refers to the original bond. That original, standard bond can be fully
released at Stage 3 where it is replaced by another approved financial
instrument, such as a trust fund as a collateral bond that will fully
secure the long-term water treatment obligation. This method, which
uses a collateral bond, is the ``provision'' for ``sound future of any
pollutional discharges.''
Additionally, Pennsylvania's regulations at 25 Pa. Code 86.151(j),
which provides that release of bonds does not alleviate the operator's
responsibility to treat discharge of mine drainage emanating from, or
hydrologically connected to, the site to the standards in the permit,
PASMCRA, the Clean Stream Law, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
(or Clean Water Act) and the rules and regulations thereunder, provides
guidance as to what qualifies as sound future treatment. Based upon
Pennsylvania's clarification about long term financial assurance, we
construe the references to ``release of bonds'' in section 86.151(j) to
mean the release of the original bond,
[[Page 52917]]
that is replaced by another bond, whether it be a trust fund or other
financial instrument used as a collateral bond, that will cover the
area and cost of treatment facilities. Therefore, to the extent that
the reference in section 4(g)(3) to release of the ``whole'' bond means
the original bond that is replaced by the new bond in the form of
another financial assurance mechanism, that reference is approved.
Section 4(g)(3) was also amended by deleting bond release language
applicable to noncoal surface mining operations. Since SMCRA contains
no counterpart to this language, the deletion of the language does not
render the Pennsylvania program inconsistent with SMCRA or the
implementing Federal regulations.
For the above noted reasons, we are approving the amendments to
Section 4(g)(3).
Dated: July 14, 2005.
Brent Wahlquist,
Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. 05-17613 Filed 9-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-M