Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Willoughby Bay, Norfolk, VA, 52338-52340 [05-17513]
Download as PDF
52338
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Proposed Rules
regular business days between the hours
of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the
Regulations Branch, Office of
Regulations and Rulings, Customs and
Border Protection, 799 9th Street, NW.,
5th Floor, Washington, DC.
Arrangements to inspect submitted
comments should be made in advance
by calling Mr. Joseph Clark at (202) 572–
8768.
Authority
This change is proposed under the
authority of 5 U.S.C. 301 and 19 U.S.C.
2, 66, and 1624.
Executive Order 12866 and the
Regulatory Flexibility Act
With DHS approval, CBP establishes,
expands and consolidates CBP ports of
entry throughout the United States to
accommodate the volume of CBP-related
activity in various parts of the country.
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that this regulatory
proposal is not a significant regulatory
action as defined under Executive Order
12866. This proposed rule also will not
have significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Accordingly, CBP certifies that this
document is not subject to the
additional requirements of the
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Signing Authority
The signing authority for this
document falls under 19 CFR 0.2(a)
because the establishment of a new port
of entry and the termination of the userfee status of an airport are not within
the bounds of those regulations for
which the Secretary of the Treasury has
retained sole authority. Accordingly, the
notice of proposed rulemaking may be
signed by the Secretary of Homeland
Security (or his or her delegate).
Dated: August 26, 2005.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–17536 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–05–098]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Willoughby Bay, Norfolk, VA
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:34 Sep 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
ACTION:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish temporary special local
regulations for the ‘‘Hampton Roads
Sailboard Classic’’, a marine event to be
held October 29 and 30, 2005 on the
waters of Willoughby Bay, Norfolk,
Virginia. These special local regulations
are necessary to provide for the safety of
life on navigable waters during the
event. This action is intended to restrict
vessel traffic in portions of Willoughby
Bay during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
October 3, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(oax), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia
23704–5004, hand-deliver them to
Room 119 at the same address between
9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays, or fax
them to (757) 398–6203. The Auxiliary
and Recreational Boating Safety Branch,
Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket (CGD05–05–098) and will
be available for inspection or copying at
the above address between 9 a.m. and 2
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Sens, Project Manager, Auxiliary
and Recreational Boating Safety Branch,
at (757) 398–6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD05–05–098),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
In order to provide notice and an
opportunity to comment before issuing
an effective rule, we are providing a
shorter than normal comment period. A
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30-day comment period is sufficient to
allow those who might be affected by
this rulemaking to submit their
comments because the regulations have
a narrow, local application, and there
will be local notifications in addition to
the Federal Register publication such as
press releases, marine information
broadcasts, and the Local Notice to
Mariners.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to the address
listed under ADDRESSES explaining why
one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
On October 29 and 30, 2005, the
Windsurfing Enthusiasts of Tidewater
will sponsor the ‘‘Hampton Roads
Sailboard Classic’’, on the waters of
Willoughby Bay, Norfolk, Virginia. The
event will consist of approximately 30
sailboards racing in heats along several
courses within Willoughby Bay.
Spectator vessels are anticipated to
gather near the event site to view the
competition. To provide for the safety of
event participants, spectators and
transiting vessels during the event, the
Coast Guard will temporarily restrict
vessel movement in the event area
during the sailboard races.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
temporary special local regulations on
specified waters of Willoughby Bay.
This rule will be enforced from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m. on October 29 and 30, 2005,
and will restrict general navigation in
the regulated area during the sailboard
race. Except for participants and vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel will be
allowed to enter or remain in the
regulated area during the enforcement
period. Non-participating vessels
desiring to transit Willoughby Bay
during the event will be able to navigate
safely around the regulated area. These
regulations are needed to control vessel
traffic during the event to enhance the
safety of participants, spectators and
transiting vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Proposed Rules
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
Although this proposed regulation
will prevent traffic from transiting a
portion of Willoughby Bay during the
event, the effect of this regulation will
not be significant because transiting
vessels will be able to safely navigate
around the regulated area. Extensive
advance notifications will be made to
the maritime community via Local
Notice to Mariners, marine information
broadcasts, local radio stations and area
newspapers, so mariners can adjust
their plans accordingly. Additionally,
the regulated area has been narrowly
tailored to impose the least impact on
general navigation yet provide the level
of safety deemed necessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
this section of Willoughby Bay during
the event.
This proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. Transiting vessels
will be able to safely navigate around
the regulated area. Before the
enforcement period, we will issue
maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:34 Sep 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
52339
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Assistance for Small Entities
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the address
listed under ADDRESSES. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
52340
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Special local
regulations issued in conjunction with a
regatta or marine parade permit are
specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under that
section.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h),
of the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we
make the final decision on whether to
categorically exclude this rule from
further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Hampton Roads.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads
with a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(3) Participant includes all vessels
participating in the Hampton Roads
Sailboard Classic under the auspices of
the Marine Event Permit issued to the
event sponsor and approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Hampton Roads.
(c) Special local regulations. (1)
Except for event participants and
persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area must:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol
and then proceed only as directed.
(ii) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Official Patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
on October 29 and 30, 2005.
Dated: August 18, 2005.
L.L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–17513 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am]
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Coast Guard
2. Add a temporary § 100.35–T05–098
to read as follows:
33 CFR Part 117
§ 100.35–T05–098
Norfolk, Virginia.
RIN 1625–AA09
Willoughby Bay,
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area
is established for the waters of
Willoughby Bay contained within the
following coordinates:
Latitude
36°58′36.0″
36°58′00.0″
36°57′49.0″
36°57′36.0″
36°57′26.0″
36°58′15.0″
36°58′36.0″
Longitude
North
North
North
North
North
North
North
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
076°18′42.0″
076°18′00.0″
076°18′14.0″
076°17′55.0″
076°18′06.0″
076°19′08.0″
076°18′42.0″
West
West
West
West
West
West
West
All coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:43 Sep 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Lafourche Bayou, Lafourche Parish,
LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
change the regulations governing six
bridges across Bayou Lafourche, south
of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, in
Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. The
Lafourche Parish Council has requested
that the bridges remain closed to
navigation at various times on weekdays
during the school year. These closures
will facilitate the safe, efficient
movement of staff, students and other
residents within the parish.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD08–05–049),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
[CGD08–05–049]
ACTION:
Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
November 1, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(obc), Eighth Coast Guard District, 500
Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana
70130–3310. The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the Bridge
Administration office between 7 a.m.
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Frank, Bridge Administration
Branch, telephone 504–589–2965.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Sfmt 4702
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. You may submit a request for
a meeting by writing to Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch at the address
under ADDRESSES explaining why one
would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The U. S. Coast Guard, at the request
of the Lafourche Parish Council,
proposes to modify the existing
operating schedules of six bridges across
Bayou Lafourche south of the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway in Lafourche
Parish, Louisiana. The six bridges
include: Golden Meadow Vertical Lift
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 170 (Friday, September 2, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52338-52340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17513]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05-05-098]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Willoughby Bay,
Norfolk, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish temporary special local
regulations for the ``Hampton Roads Sailboard Classic'', a marine event
to be held October 29 and 30, 2005 on the waters of Willoughby Bay,
Norfolk, Virginia. These special local regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to restrict vessel traffic in portions of
Willoughby Bay during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before October 3, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander
(oax), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth,
Virginia 23704-5004, hand-deliver them to Room 119 at the same address
between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays, or fax them to (757) 398-6203. The Auxiliary and Recreational
Boating Safety Branch, Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the public
docket for this rulemaking. Comments and material received from the
public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part of this docket (CGD05-05-098)
and will be available for inspection or copying at the above address
between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Sens, Project Manager,
Auxiliary and Recreational Boating Safety Branch, at (757) 398-6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD05-05-
098), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
In order to provide notice and an opportunity to comment before
issuing an effective rule, we are providing a shorter than normal
comment period. A 30-day comment period is sufficient to allow those
who might be affected by this rulemaking to submit their comments
because the regulations have a narrow, local application, and there
will be local notifications in addition to the Federal Register
publication such as press releases, marine information broadcasts, and
the Local Notice to Mariners.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to the address listed under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would
aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
On October 29 and 30, 2005, the Windsurfing Enthusiasts of
Tidewater will sponsor the ``Hampton Roads Sailboard Classic'', on the
waters of Willoughby Bay, Norfolk, Virginia. The event will consist of
approximately 30 sailboards racing in heats along several courses
within Willoughby Bay. Spectator vessels are anticipated to gather near
the event site to view the competition. To provide for the safety of
event participants, spectators and transiting vessels during the event,
the Coast Guard will temporarily restrict vessel movement in the event
area during the sailboard races.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish temporary special local
regulations on specified waters of Willoughby Bay. This rule will be
enforced from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on October 29 and 30, 2005, and will
restrict general navigation in the regulated area during the sailboard
race. Except for participants and vessels authorized by the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander, no person or vessel will be allowed to enter or
remain in the regulated area during the enforcement period. Non-
participating vessels desiring to transit Willoughby Bay during the
event will be able to navigate safely around the regulated area. These
regulations are needed to control vessel traffic during the event to
enhance the safety of participants, spectators and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under
[[Page 52339]]
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has
not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this proposed regulation will prevent traffic from
transiting a portion of Willoughby Bay during the event, the effect of
this regulation will not be significant because transiting vessels will
be able to safely navigate around the regulated area. Extensive advance
notifications will be made to the maritime community via Local Notice
to Mariners, marine information broadcasts, local radio stations and
area newspapers, so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Additionally, the regulated area has been narrowly tailored to impose
the least impact on general navigation yet provide the level of safety
deemed necessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit this section of Willoughby
Bay during the event.
This proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons.
Transiting vessels will be able to safely navigate around the regulated
area. Before the enforcement period, we will issue maritime advisories
so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the address listed under
ADDRESSES. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
[[Page 52340]]
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Special local regulations issued in
conjunction with a regatta or marine parade permit are specifically
excluded from further analysis and documentation under that section.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we make the final decision on whether
to categorically exclude this rule from further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary Sec. 100.35-T05-098 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35-T05-098 Willoughby Bay, Norfolk, Virginia.
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area is established for the
waters of Willoughby Bay contained within the following coordinates:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
36[deg]58'36.0'' North.................... 076[deg]18'42.0'' West
36[deg]58'00.0'' North.................... 076[deg]18'00.0'' West
36[deg]57'49.0'' North.................... 076[deg]18'14.0'' West
36[deg]57'36.0'' North.................... 076[deg]17'55.0'' West
36[deg]57'26.0'' North.................... 076[deg]18'06.0'' West
36[deg]58'15.0'' North.................... 076[deg]19'08.0'' West
36[deg]58'36.0'' North.................... 076[deg]18'42.0'' West
------------------------------------------------------------------------
All coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads with a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(3) Participant includes all vessels participating in the Hampton
Roads Sailboard Classic under the auspices of the Marine Event Permit
issued to the event sponsor and approved by Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Hampton Roads.
(c) Special local regulations. (1) Except for event participants
and persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area must:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when directed to do so by any
Official Patrol and then proceed only as directed.
(ii) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Official Patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m. on October 29 and 30, 2005.
Dated: August 18, 2005.
L.L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05-17513 Filed 9-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P