Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Lafourche Bayou, Lafourche Parish, LA, 52340-52343 [05-17509]
Download as PDF
52340
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Special local
regulations issued in conjunction with a
regatta or marine parade permit are
specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under that
section.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h),
of the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we
make the final decision on whether to
categorically exclude this rule from
further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Hampton Roads.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads
with a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(3) Participant includes all vessels
participating in the Hampton Roads
Sailboard Classic under the auspices of
the Marine Event Permit issued to the
event sponsor and approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Hampton Roads.
(c) Special local regulations. (1)
Except for event participants and
persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area must:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol
and then proceed only as directed.
(ii) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Official Patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
on October 29 and 30, 2005.
Dated: August 18, 2005.
L.L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–17513 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am]
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Coast Guard
2. Add a temporary § 100.35–T05–098
to read as follows:
33 CFR Part 117
§ 100.35–T05–098
Norfolk, Virginia.
RIN 1625–AA09
Willoughby Bay,
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area
is established for the waters of
Willoughby Bay contained within the
following coordinates:
Latitude
36°58′36.0″
36°58′00.0″
36°57′49.0″
36°57′36.0″
36°57′26.0″
36°58′15.0″
36°58′36.0″
Longitude
North
North
North
North
North
North
North
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
076°18′42.0″
076°18′00.0″
076°18′14.0″
076°17′55.0″
076°18′06.0″
076°19′08.0″
076°18′42.0″
West
West
West
West
West
West
West
All coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:43 Sep 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Lafourche Bayou, Lafourche Parish,
LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
change the regulations governing six
bridges across Bayou Lafourche, south
of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, in
Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. The
Lafourche Parish Council has requested
that the bridges remain closed to
navigation at various times on weekdays
during the school year. These closures
will facilitate the safe, efficient
movement of staff, students and other
residents within the parish.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD08–05–049),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
[CGD08–05–049]
ACTION:
Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
November 1, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(obc), Eighth Coast Guard District, 500
Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana
70130–3310. The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the Bridge
Administration office between 7 a.m.
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Frank, Bridge Administration
Branch, telephone 504–589–2965.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Sfmt 4702
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. You may submit a request for
a meeting by writing to Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch at the address
under ADDRESSES explaining why one
would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The U. S. Coast Guard, at the request
of the Lafourche Parish Council,
proposes to modify the existing
operating schedules of six bridges across
Bayou Lafourche south of the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway in Lafourche
Parish, Louisiana. The six bridges
include: Golden Meadow Vertical Lift
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Bridge, mile 23.9; the Galliano Pontoon
Bridge, mile 27.8; the Galliano/South
Lafourche (Tarpon) Vertical Lift Bridge,
mile 30.6; the Cote Blanche Pontoon
Bridge, mile 33.9; the Cutoff Vertical
Lift Bridge, mile 36.3; and the Larose
Pontoon Bridge, mile 39.1. The
modification of the existing regulations
will allow these bridges to remain
closed to navigation from 7 a.m. to 8
a.m.; from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.; and from
4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday from August 15 through May 31.
At all other times, the bridges would
open on signal for the passage of
vessels.
Presently, only two of these bridges
have special operation regulations
published in the Code of Federal
Regulations. The Galliano/South
Lafourche (Tarpon) Vertical Lift Bridge,
mile 30.6, and the Cote Blanche
Pontoon Bridge, mile 33.9, open on
signal; except that, from 2:30 p.m. to
3:30 p.m. and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30
p.m. Monday through Friday except
Federal holidays, the draws need not
open for the passage of vessels. The
other four bridges open on signal for the
passage of vessels pursuant to 33 CFR
117.5.
Traffic counts and vessel openings
vary among the six bridges. The
Louisiana Department of Transportation
and Development provided information
on vessel openings and traffic counts for
the Larose Pontoon Bridge, mile 39.1;
the Galliano/South Lafourche (Tarpon)
Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 30.6; and the
Golden Meadow Vertical Lift Bridge,
mile 23.9. The Lafourche Parish Council
provided information on vessel
openings and traffic counts for the
Cutoff Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 36.3;
the Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile
33.9; and the Galliano Pontoon Bridge,
mile 27.8.
The Larose Pontoon Bridge, mile 39.1,
is the first bridge south of the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway intersection. This
bridge is located just south of a flood
control structure that has a horizontal
clearance of 56 feet and a depth over the
sill of 10 feet. The bridge opens an
average of 410 times a month for
vessels. Based upon the request,
approximately 18% of the vessels would
be affected by the proposed closures.
Traffic counts indicate that 9,000
vehicles cross the bridge daily and
approximately 23% of those vehicles
cross during the requested closure
times. Vessel openings of the bridge
delay vehicular traffic nine minutes per
opening, delaying 20 vehicles per
opening.
The Larose Pontoon Bridge is
presently scheduled for replacement.
The new bridge will be a vertical lift
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:34 Sep 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
bridge and it will be located 0.4 miles
downstream from its present location.
Once the new bridge is constructed, the
old bridge will be removed. The special
operating regulation for the old bridge,
if approved, may not be transferred to
the new bridge and a new request for a
special operation regulation must be
made for the new bridge.
The Cutoff Vertical Lift Bridge, mile
36.3 is the next bridge downstream from
the Larose Pontoon Bridge. The bridge
opens an average of 419 times a month
for vessels. Based upon the request,
approximately 23% of the vessels would
be affected by the proposed closures.
Traffic counts indicate that 7180
vehicles cross the bridge daily and
approximately 33% of those vehicles
cross during the requested closure
times. Vessel openings of the bridge
delay vehicular traffic five minutes per
opening, delaying 80 vehicles per
opening.
The Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge,
mile 33.9 is the next bridge downstream
from the Cutoff Vertical Lift Bridge. The
bridge opens an average of 441 times a
month for vessels. Based upon the
request, approximately 23% of the
vessels would be affected by the
proposed closures. Traffic counts
indicate that 7180 vehicles cross the
bridge daily and approximately 33% of
those vehicles cross during the
requested closure times. Vessel
openings of the bridge delay vehicular
traffic five minutes per opening,
delaying 54 vehicles per opening.
The Galliano/South Lafourche
(Tarpon) Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 30.6
is the next bridge downstream from the
Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge. The
bridge opens an average of 430 times a
month for vessels. Based upon the
request, approximately 20% of the
vessels would be affected by the
proposed closures. Traffic counts
indicate that 8000 vehicles cross the
bridge daily and approximately 28% of
those vehicles cross during the
requested closure times. Vessel
openings of the bridge delay vehicular
traffic six minutes per opening, delaying
43 vehicles per opening.
The Galliano Pontoon Bridge, mile
27.8 is the next bridge downstream from
the Galliano/South Lafourche (Tarpon)
Vertical Lift Bridge. The bridge opens an
average of 580 times a month for
vessels. Based upon the request,
approximately 23% of the vessels would
be affected by the proposed closures.
Traffic counts indicate that 5040
vehicles cross the bridge daily and
approximately 34% of those vehicles
cross during the requested closure
times. Vessel openings of the bridge
delay vehicular traffic five minutes per
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52341
opening, delaying 60 vehicles per
opening.
The Golden Meadow Vertical Lift
Bridge, mile 23.9 is the next bridge
downstream from the Galliano Pontoon
Bridge. The bridge opens an average of
610 times a month for vessels. Based
upon the request, approximately 30% of
the vessels would be affected by the
proposed closures. Traffic counts
indicate that 2400 vehicles cross the
bridge daily and approximately 30% of
those vehicles cross during the
requested closure times. Vessel
openings of the bridge delay vehicular
traffic six minutes per opening, delaying
16 vehicles per opening.
Navigation at the sites of the bridges
consists primarily of commercial and
recreational fishing vessels, crew boats,
and some tugboats with barges.
Alternate routes are not readily
accessible.
The existing regulations on the
Galliano/South Lafourche (Tarpon)
Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 30.6 and the
Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile 33.9,
were established on September 20,
1995. Since the establishment of these
special operation regulations, the Coast
Guard has not received any formal
complaints regarding the operation of
the bridges. It has been approximately
ten years since the last formal request to
change the operating regulations of the
Cote Blanche Bridge and the Galliano/
South Lafourche Bridge. The Coast
Guard is interested in obtaining
comments in response to this current
request from all interested parties with
regard to how the proposed changes to
the regulations will affect them.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would modify the
existing regulations in 33 CFR 117.465
to facilitate the movement of high
volumes of vehicular traffic across the
bridges during periods of increased
transits during the school year. These
closures would allow for vehicles and
school busses to transit across the
bridges unimpeded both before and after
school hours. The change would allow
these six bridges on Bayou Lafourche
south of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway,
mile 35.6 west of Harvey Lock, in
Larose, to remain closed to navigation
from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m.; from 2 p.m. to 4
p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday from August 15
to May 31. At all other times, the
bridges will open on signal for the
passage of vessels. The proposed
regulation does not affect the SR 1
(Leeville) Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 13.3.
This bridge is a mid-level vertical lift
bridge and is scheduled to be replaced
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
52342
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Proposed Rules
by a high-level fixed bridge in the near
future.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security. We
expect the economic impact of this
proposed rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
This proposed rule would allow
vessels to transit this waterway with
proper notification before and after the
peak vehicular traffic periods.
According to the information provided
by the applicant, the public at large is
better served by the closure times.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities: the owners and
operators of vessels needing to transit
the bridges during the requested closure
periods.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this proposed rule would economically
affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:34 Sep 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the Eighth
Coast Guard District Bridge
Administration Branch at the address
above. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this proposed rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
economically significant rule and would
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Proposed Rules
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
proposed rule is categorically excluded,
under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
RIN 1625–AA09
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
Stat. 5039.
2. § 117.465(a) is revised to read as
follows:
Lafourche Bayou.
(a) The draws of the following bridges
shall open on signal; except that, from
August 15 through May 31, the draw
need not open for the passage of vessels
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays, from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m.; from 2
p.m. to 4 p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to
5:30 p.m.:
(1) SR 308 (Golden Meadow) Bridge,
mile 23.9, at Golden Meadow.
(2) Galliano Pontoon Bridge, mile
27.8, at Galliano.
(3) SR 308 (South Lafourche (Tarpon))
Bridge, mile 30.6, at Galliano.
(4) Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile
33.9, at Cutoff.
(5) Cutoff Vertical Lift Bridge, mile
36.3, at Cutoff.
(6) SR 310 (Larose Pontoon) Bridge,
mile 39.1, at Larose.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 26, 2005.
Kevin L. Marshall,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, 8th Coast Guard Dist.
[FR Doc. 05–17509 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
VerDate Aug<18>2005
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD08–05–046]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway, West Larose,
LA
Regulations
§ 117.465
Coast Guard
15:34 Sep 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
change the regulation governing the
operation of the SR 1 (West Larose)
vertical lift bridge across the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 35.6 west of
Harvey Lock, at Larose, Louisiana. The
Lafourche Parish Council has requested
that the bridge remain closed to
navigation at various times on weekdays
during the school year. These closures
will facilitate the safe, efficient
movement of staff, students and other
residents within the parish.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
November 1, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(obc), Eighth Coast Guard District, 500
Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana
70130–3310. The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the Bridge
Administration office between 7 a.m.
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Frank, Bridge Administration
Branch, telephone 504–589–2965.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD08–05–046),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52343
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. You may submit a request for
a meeting by writing to Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch at the address
under ADDRESSES explaining why one
would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The U. S. Coast Guard, at the request
of the Lafourche Parish Council,
proposes to modify the existing
operating schedule of the SR 1 (West
Larose) vertical lift bridge across the
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 35.6
west of Harvey Lock, at Larose,
Louisiana. The modification of the
existing regulations will allow the
bridge to remain closed to navigation
from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m.; from 2 p.m. to 4
p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday during the
school year. Currently, the bridge opens
on signal pursuant to 33 CFR 117.5.
Approximately 11,600 vehicles cross
the bridge daily, 25% of which cross the
bridge during the requested closure
times. The bridge averages 976 openings
a month. Approximately 25% of the
bridge openings occur during the
requested closure times. The average
length of a bridge opening is
approximately 10 to 12 minutes.
Navigation at the site of the bridge
consists primarily of tugboats with
barges. Alternate routes east and west
through the bridge are not readily
accessible; however, the bridge, in the
closed-to-navigation position provides a
vertical clearance of 35 feet above high
water.
It should be noted that there have
been two previous requests by the
Lafourche Parish to establish special
operating regulations for this bridge. On
December 7, 1994, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal
Register (59 FR 63068). The proposed
change to the regulation would have
required that from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
and from 4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m. Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays,
the draw of the bridge would remain
closed to navigation for passage of
vehicular traffic during peak traffic
periods. At all other times the draw
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 170 (Friday, September 2, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52340-52343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17509]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD08-05-049]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Lafourche Bayou, Lafourche
Parish, LA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the regulations governing
six bridges across Bayou Lafourche, south of the Gulf Intracoastal
Waterway, in Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. The Lafourche Parish Council
has requested that the bridges remain closed to navigation at various
times on weekdays during the school year. These closures will
facilitate the safe, efficient movement of staff, students and other
residents within the parish.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before November 1, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander
(obc), Eighth Coast Guard District, 500 Poydras Street, New Orleans,
Louisiana 70130-3310. The Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District,
Bridge Administration Branch maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
will become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or
copying at the Bridge Administration office between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Frank, Bridge Administration
Branch, telephone 504-589-2965.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD08-05-
049), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. You may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District, Bridge Administration Branch at the address under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would
aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The U. S. Coast Guard, at the request of the Lafourche Parish
Council, proposes to modify the existing operating schedules of six
bridges across Bayou Lafourche south of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway
in Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. The six bridges include: Golden Meadow
Vertical Lift
[[Page 52341]]
Bridge, mile 23.9; the Galliano Pontoon Bridge, mile 27.8; the
Galliano/South Lafourche (Tarpon) Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 30.6; the
Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile 33.9; the Cutoff Vertical Lift
Bridge, mile 36.3; and the Larose Pontoon Bridge, mile 39.1. The
modification of the existing regulations will allow these bridges to
remain closed to navigation from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m.; from 2 p.m. to 4
p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday from
August 15 through May 31. At all other times, the bridges would open on
signal for the passage of vessels.
Presently, only two of these bridges have special operation
regulations published in the Code of Federal Regulations. The Galliano/
South Lafourche (Tarpon) Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 30.6, and the Cote
Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile 33.9, open on signal; except that, from
2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Monday through
Friday except Federal holidays, the draws need not open for the passage
of vessels. The other four bridges open on signal for the passage of
vessels pursuant to 33 CFR 117.5.
Traffic counts and vessel openings vary among the six bridges. The
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development provided
information on vessel openings and traffic counts for the Larose
Pontoon Bridge, mile 39.1; the Galliano/South Lafourche (Tarpon)
Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 30.6; and the Golden Meadow Vertical Lift
Bridge, mile 23.9. The Lafourche Parish Council provided information on
vessel openings and traffic counts for the Cutoff Vertical Lift Bridge,
mile 36.3; the Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile 33.9; and the Galliano
Pontoon Bridge, mile 27.8.
The Larose Pontoon Bridge, mile 39.1, is the first bridge south of
the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection. This bridge is located
just south of a flood control structure that has a horizontal clearance
of 56 feet and a depth over the sill of 10 feet. The bridge opens an
average of 410 times a month for vessels. Based upon the request,
approximately 18% of the vessels would be affected by the proposed
closures. Traffic counts indicate that 9,000 vehicles cross the bridge
daily and approximately 23% of those vehicles cross during the
requested closure times. Vessel openings of the bridge delay vehicular
traffic nine minutes per opening, delaying 20 vehicles per opening.
The Larose Pontoon Bridge is presently scheduled for replacement.
The new bridge will be a vertical lift bridge and it will be located
0.4 miles downstream from its present location. Once the new bridge is
constructed, the old bridge will be removed. The special operating
regulation for the old bridge, if approved, may not be transferred to
the new bridge and a new request for a special operation regulation
must be made for the new bridge.
The Cutoff Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 36.3 is the next bridge
downstream from the Larose Pontoon Bridge. The bridge opens an average
of 419 times a month for vessels. Based upon the request, approximately
23% of the vessels would be affected by the proposed closures. Traffic
counts indicate that 7180 vehicles cross the bridge daily and
approximately 33% of those vehicles cross during the requested closure
times. Vessel openings of the bridge delay vehicular traffic five
minutes per opening, delaying 80 vehicles per opening.
The Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile 33.9 is the next bridge
downstream from the Cutoff Vertical Lift Bridge. The bridge opens an
average of 441 times a month for vessels. Based upon the request,
approximately 23% of the vessels would be affected by the proposed
closures. Traffic counts indicate that 7180 vehicles cross the bridge
daily and approximately 33% of those vehicles cross during the
requested closure times. Vessel openings of the bridge delay vehicular
traffic five minutes per opening, delaying 54 vehicles per opening.
The Galliano/South Lafourche (Tarpon) Vertical Lift Bridge, mile
30.6 is the next bridge downstream from the Cote Blanche Pontoon
Bridge. The bridge opens an average of 430 times a month for vessels.
Based upon the request, approximately 20% of the vessels would be
affected by the proposed closures. Traffic counts indicate that 8000
vehicles cross the bridge daily and approximately 28% of those vehicles
cross during the requested closure times. Vessel openings of the bridge
delay vehicular traffic six minutes per opening, delaying 43 vehicles
per opening.
The Galliano Pontoon Bridge, mile 27.8 is the next bridge
downstream from the Galliano/South Lafourche (Tarpon) Vertical Lift
Bridge. The bridge opens an average of 580 times a month for vessels.
Based upon the request, approximately 23% of the vessels would be
affected by the proposed closures. Traffic counts indicate that 5040
vehicles cross the bridge daily and approximately 34% of those vehicles
cross during the requested closure times. Vessel openings of the bridge
delay vehicular traffic five minutes per opening, delaying 60 vehicles
per opening.
The Golden Meadow Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 23.9 is the next
bridge downstream from the Galliano Pontoon Bridge. The bridge opens an
average of 610 times a month for vessels. Based upon the request,
approximately 30% of the vessels would be affected by the proposed
closures. Traffic counts indicate that 2400 vehicles cross the bridge
daily and approximately 30% of those vehicles cross during the
requested closure times. Vessel openings of the bridge delay vehicular
traffic six minutes per opening, delaying 16 vehicles per opening.
Navigation at the sites of the bridges consists primarily of
commercial and recreational fishing vessels, crew boats, and some
tugboats with barges. Alternate routes are not readily accessible.
The existing regulations on the Galliano/South Lafourche (Tarpon)
Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 30.6 and the Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge,
mile 33.9, were established on September 20, 1995. Since the
establishment of these special operation regulations, the Coast Guard
has not received any formal complaints regarding the operation of the
bridges. It has been approximately ten years since the last formal
request to change the operating regulations of the Cote Blanche Bridge
and the Galliano/South Lafourche Bridge. The Coast Guard is interested
in obtaining comments in response to this current request from all
interested parties with regard to how the proposed changes to the
regulations will affect them.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would modify the existing regulations in 33 CFR
117.465 to facilitate the movement of high volumes of vehicular traffic
across the bridges during periods of increased transits during the
school year. These closures would allow for vehicles and school busses
to transit across the bridges unimpeded both before and after school
hours. The change would allow these six bridges on Bayou Lafourche
south of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 35.6 west of Harvey Lock,
in Larose, to remain closed to navigation from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m.; from 2
p.m. to 4 p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Monday through Friday
from August 15 to May 31. At all other times, the bridges will open on
signal for the passage of vessels. The proposed regulation does not
affect the SR 1 (Leeville) Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 13.3. This bridge
is a mid-level vertical lift bridge and is scheduled to be replaced
[[Page 52342]]
by a high-level fixed bridge in the near future.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security. We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule
to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory
policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
This proposed rule would allow vessels to transit this waterway
with proper notification before and after the peak vehicular traffic
periods. According to the information provided by the applicant, the
public at large is better served by the closure times.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities: the owners and operators of vessels needing to transit the
bridges during the requested closure periods.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the Eighth Coast Guard District
Bridge Administration Branch at the address above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this proposed rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
[[Page 52343]]
in this case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under
section 2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this proposed rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.
2. Sec. 117.465(a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 117.465 Lafourche Bayou.
(a) The draws of the following bridges shall open on signal; except
that, from August 15 through May 31, the draw need not open for the
passage of vessels Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, from
7 a.m. to 8 a.m.; from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30
p.m.:
(1) SR 308 (Golden Meadow) Bridge, mile 23.9, at Golden Meadow.
(2) Galliano Pontoon Bridge, mile 27.8, at Galliano.
(3) SR 308 (South Lafourche (Tarpon)) Bridge, mile 30.6, at
Galliano.
(4) Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile 33.9, at Cutoff.
(5) Cutoff Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 36.3, at Cutoff.
(6) SR 310 (Larose Pontoon) Bridge, mile 39.1, at Larose.
* * * * *
Dated: August 26, 2005.
Kevin L. Marshall,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, 8th Coast Guard Dist.
[FR Doc. 05-17509 Filed 9-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P