Agency Emergency Processing Under Office of Management and Budget Review; Guidance for Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006, 52108-52110 [05-17413]

Download as PDF 52108 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 169 / Thursday, September 1, 2005 / Notices have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, we are not preparing an analysis for the RFA. In addition, section 1102(b) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires us to prepare a regulatory impact analysis if a rule may have a significant impact on the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This analysis must conform to the provisions of section 604 of the RFA. For purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small rural hospital as a hospital that is located outside of a Metropolitan Statistical Area and has fewer than 100 beds. We have determined that this notice will not have a significant effect on the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. Therefore, we are not preparing an analysis for section 1102(b) of the Act. Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in expenditures in any 1 year by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $110 million. This notice has no consequential effect on State, local, or tribal governments or on the private sector. Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it publishes a rule that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism implications. This notice will not have a substantial effect on State or local governments. There are no other alternatives at this time. In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this notice was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. Authority: Sections 1102 and 1871 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and 1395hh). (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.774, Medicare— Supplementary Medical Insurance Program) Dated: May 17, 2005. Mark B. McClellan, Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Approved: August 25, 2005. Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary. [FR Doc. 05–17278 Filed 8–26–05; 9:46 am] BILLING CODE 4120–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Food and Drug Administration Family and Youth Services Bureau; Positive Youth Development State and Local Collaboration Demonstration Projects Agency Emergency Processing Under Office of Management and Budget Review; Guidance for Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006 Family and Youth Services Bureau, Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Award announcement. AGENCY: CFDA#: The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for this program is 93.623. The title is the Positive Youth Development State and Local Collaboration Demonstration Projects. Legislative Authority: Grants for Runaway and Homeless Youth programs are authorized by the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act (title III of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974), as amended by the Missing, Exploited, and Runaway Children Protection Act of 1999, (Pub. L. 106–71). Amount of Award: $100,000 per grantee. Project Period: 9/30/04–9/29/05. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a noncompetitive grant supplement is being made to the following state agencies: State of Nebraska Health & Human Services, University of Kentucky Research Foundation, State of Oregon, New York Office of Children & Family Services, State of Louisiana, Iowa Dept. of Human Rights Criminal & Juvenile Justice, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Illinois Department of Human Services, Governor’s Office for Children Youth & Families. The purpose of this supplement is to support collaborations between state-level agencies and local community jurisdictions regarding positive development opportunities available to young people as approved in their original planning grant. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Administration for Children and Families, Family and Youth Services Bureau, 330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Courtney Workman—(202) 205–8657, cworkman@acf.hhs.gov. Dated: August 22, 2005. Joan E. Ohl, Commissioner, Administration on Children, Youth and Families. [FR Doc. 05–17371 Filed 8–31–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184–01–P VerDate Aug<18>2005 16:30 Aug 31, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [Docket No. 2005N–0343] AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for emergency processing under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA). FDA is preparing a guidance document to notify the public of procedures being implemented by the agency to assist firms that wish to request, on a case-by-case basis upon an appropriate showing, an extension to use existing label stock after the effective date of the trans fat labeling final rule. This notice solicits comments on the proposed collection of information associated with the guidance document entitled ‘‘Guidance for Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006.’’ DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by October 3, 2005. FDA is requesting approval of this emergency processing by September 8, 2005. ADDRESSES: OMB is still experiencing significant delays in the regular mail, including first class and express mail, and messenger deliveries are not being accepted. To ensure that comments on the information collection are received, OMB recommends that comments be faxed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Fumie Yokota, Desk Officer for FDA, FAX: 202–395–6974. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Robbins, Office of Management Programs (HFA–250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–1223. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA has requested emergency processing of this proposed collection of information under section 3507(j) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507(j)) and 5 CFR 1320.13. FDA issued a final rule (the trans fat final rule) on July 11, 2003 (68 FR 41434) to E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1 52109 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 169 / Thursday, September 1, 2005 / Notices require food labels to bear the gram amount of trans fat without a percent Daily Value (% DV) directly under the saturated fat line on the Nutrition Facts panel (https://www.cfsan.fda.gov/ ~acrobat/fr03711a.pdf). The trans fat final rule amended paragraph (c)(2) of § 101.9 Nutrition Labeling of Food (21 CFR 101.9). The effective date for the trans fat final rule is January 1, 2006. However, FDA has been advised by some businesses that they may experience hardship in revising their labels in time to meet the compliance date for trans fat labeling. Therefore, the agency believes that it would be appropriate to consider, on a case-bycase basis upon an appropriate showing, whether to exercise enforcement discretion with respect to the January 1, 2006, effective date for trans fat labeling for some businesses, so that these businesses would have the option of using some or all of their existing label stock that does not comply with the trans fat final rule. FDA intends to notify the public, in a level 1 guidance document issued under the good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115), of the factors it intends to consider in granting or denying such requests and the process businesses may use to request the agency’s consideration for enforcement discretion on trans fat labeling requirements. At a later date, FDA will announce the availability of a guidance entitled ‘‘Guidance for Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006.’’ The guidance will provide voluntary recommendations on the process for firms that wish to request an extension to use existing label stock after the effective date of the trans fat final rule. Because this guidance involves a collection of information, the PRA is implicated. However, the delay associated with normal PRA clearance procedures can reasonably be anticipated to prevent or disrupt the collection of information during a time period within which businesses would be most likely to make the request for the use of existing label stock before the effective date of January 1, 2006. As a result, given the need for immediate action, FDA requests emergency processing of this collection of information request. With respect to the following proposed collection of information, FDA invites comments on the following topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA’s functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information technology. Title: Guidance for Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006. Description: This policy provides guidance to FDA and the food industry about when and how businesses may request that the agency consider enforcement discretion for the use of some or all existing label stock, that does not declare trans fat labeling in compliance with the trans fat final rule, on products introduced into interstate commerce on or after the January 1, 2006, effective date. Industry Compliance With the Trans Fat Final Rule The trans fat final rule affects almost all manufacturers of packaged, labeled food sold in the United States. FDA believes that most businesses, including small businesses, should not have difficulty meeting the January 1, 2006, effective date of the trans fat final rule. However, under certain circumstances some businesses may want to request that the agency consider an extension of time to use current labels that are not in compliance with the trans fat final rule. Therefore, the agency believes that it would be appropriate to consider, on a case-by-case basis, whether to exercise enforcement discretion on the January 1, 2006, effective date for trans fat labeling for some businesses that can make an appropriate showing. The agency intends to consider the following factors in any request from a firm for the agency’s exercise of enforcement discretion: • Whether products contain 0.5 gram or less trans fat; • The explanation of why the request is being made; • The number of existing labels that the firm is requesting to use; • The dollar amount associated with the number of existing labels to be used; and • The estimate of the amount of time needed, not exceeding 12 months, to exhaust the number of existing labels the firm is requesting to use. Requests may be considered at any time before or after the January 1, 2006, effective date of the trans fat final rule. Firms may submit their requests in writing to FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Firms are encouraged to keep this letter of request for their records and should make a copy available for inspection to any officer or employee of the FDA who requests it. FDA intends to use the information in the letter to make decisions about whether a firm’s product is subject to FDA’s enforcement discretion for the trans fat labeling requirements. FDA estimates the burden of the collection of information as follows: TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1 Annual Frequency per Response No. of Respondents Activity Total Annual Responses Hours per Response Total Hours Written requests to FDA in year one 56 1 56 5 280 Written requests to FDA in year two 28 1 28 5 140 Onetime burden hours for years one and two 1 There 420 are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. FDA estimates a 2-year time period during which these requests will be made following the issuance of this VerDate Aug<18>2005 16:30 Aug 31, 2005 Jkt 205001 guidance. Beyond 2 years, FDA expects businesses to fully comply with the trans fat final rule, as it is unlikely that PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 there will still be old labeling stock left to use. E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1 52110 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 169 / Thursday, September 1, 2005 / Notices FDA expects that, although all sizes of business are eligible, small businesses and very small businesses are the firms most likely to be able to demonstrate a need to request an extension to the trans fat labeling deadline. The agency has already received three requests from businesses regarding the trans fat labeling compliance date of January 1, 2006. Because small businesses are more likely to submit requests for extensions, and most of the affected businesses are small, we use the number of small businesses as the base to calculate the reporting burden. The regulatory flexibility analysis of the trans fat final rule estimated that 11,180 small businesses will have to revise the label on their products as a result of the trans fat final rule. Given that only three businesses have submitted requests to FDA so far, FDA estimates that, in the first year following the issuance of the guidance, the total number of businesses that will request a labeling compliance extension from FDA can be estimated as approximately 0.5 percent of the number of small businesses, which equals 56. FDA estimates that it will take one employee approximately 4 hours to put together a request to FDA and approximately 1 hour for a supervisor to look over the request before submitting it to the agency. Thus, each firm submitting a compliance extension request will need 5 hours of employee time to complete the request. Given that 56 businesses are expected to submit written requests in year one, the total burden hours for year one are 280. In year two, FDA expects about onehalf as many firms to request a labeling compliance extension. So for year two, 28 firms are expected to file a request for an extension to the labeling compliance date. Again, assuming that it will take 5 hours to complete each request, the total burden hours for year two will be 140. Dated: August 26, 2005. Jeffrey Shuren, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 05–17413 Filed 8–29–05; 2:49 pm] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration General Hospital and Personal Use Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. VerDate Aug<18>2005 16:30 Aug 31, 2005 Jkt 205001 ACTION: Notice. This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will be open to the public. Name of Committee: General Hospital and Personal Use Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and recommendations to the agency on FDA’s regulatory issues. Date and Time: The meeting will be held on September 27, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Location: Hilton Washington DC North/Gaithersburg, Ballroom, 620 Perry Pkwy., Gaithersburg, MD. Contact Person: Scott Colburn, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ–480), Food and Drug Administration, 9200 Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301–594–1287, ext. 177, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1–800–741–8138 (301–443–0572 in the Washington, DC area), code 3014512520. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information on this meeting. Agenda: The committee will hear a presentation on FDA’s Critical Path Initiative. Subsequently, the committee will discuss and make recommendations regarding general issues related to the model used for validation testing to support a claim of decontamination of potentially transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE)-contaminated surgical instruments. Background information for the topics, including the agenda and questions for the committee, will be available to the public 1 business day before the meeting, on the Internet at https://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ panelmtg.html. Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. Written submissions may be made to the contact person by September 13, 2005. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled for approximately 60 minutes at the beginning of deliberations and for approximately 30 minutes near the end of deliberations. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. Those desiring to make formal oral presentations should notify the contact person before September 13, 2005, and submit a brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed participants, and PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 an indication of the approximate time requested to make their presentation. Persons attending FDA’s advisory committee meetings are advised that the agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical outlets. FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special accommodations due to a disability, please contact AnnMarie Willliams at 240–276–0450, ext. 113, at least 7 days in advance of the meeting. Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2). Dated: August 23, 2005. Scott Gottlieb, Deputy Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 05–17412 Filed 8–31–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Health Resources and Services Administration Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines; Notice of Meeting Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice; amendment. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Health Resources and Services Administration is amending a notice that appeared in the Federal Register of August 22, 2005 (70 FR 48962–48963) announcing an Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines meeting on September 14, 2005. The document announced that the public can join the meeting by attending in person or by audio conference call. The meeting will now be held by audio conference call only. This document amends the notice by changing the place of the meeting. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cheryl Lee at 301–443–2124 or e-mail clee@hrsa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 05–16502, beginning on page 48962 in the Federal Register of Monday, August 22, 2005, make the following amendment on page 48963 in the third paragraph: Change place of meeting to Audio Conference Call. Dated: August 25, 2005. Tina M. Cheatham, Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination. [FR Doc. 05–17379 Filed 8–31–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165–15–P E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 169 (Thursday, September 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52108-52110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2005N-0343]


Agency Emergency Processing Under Office of Management and Budget 
Review; Guidance for Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label 
Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for emergency processing under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA). FDA is preparing a guidance 
document to notify the public of procedures being implemented by the 
agency to assist firms that wish to request, on a case-by-case basis 
upon an appropriate showing, an extension to use existing label stock 
after the effective date of the trans fat labeling final rule. This 
notice solicits comments on the proposed collection of information 
associated with the guidance document entitled ``Guidance for 
Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat 
Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006.''

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by October 
3, 2005. FDA is requesting approval of this emergency processing by 
September 8, 2005.

ADDRESSES: OMB is still experiencing significant delays in the regular 
mail, including first class and express mail, and messenger deliveries 
are not being accepted. To ensure that comments on the information 
collection are received, OMB recommends that comments be faxed to the 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Fumie Yokota, 
Desk Officer for FDA, FAX: 202-395-6974.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Robbins, Office of Management 
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA has requested emergency processing of 
this proposed collection of information under section 3507(j) of the 
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507(j)) and 5 CFR 1320.13. FDA issued a final rule (the 
trans fat final rule) on July 11, 2003 (68 FR 41434) to

[[Page 52109]]

require food labels to bear the gram amount of trans fat without a 
percent Daily Value (% DV) directly under the saturated fat line on the 
Nutrition Facts panel (https://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~acrobat/fr03711a.pdf). 
The trans fat final rule amended paragraph (c)(2) of Sec.  101.9 
Nutrition Labeling of Food (21 CFR 101.9). The effective date for the 
trans fat final rule is January 1, 2006. However, FDA has been advised 
by some businesses that they may experience hardship in revising their 
labels in time to meet the compliance date for trans fat labeling. 
Therefore, the agency believes that it would be appropriate to 
consider, on a case-by-case basis upon an appropriate showing, whether 
to exercise enforcement discretion with respect to the January 1, 2006, 
effective date for trans fat labeling for some businesses, so that 
these businesses would have the option of using some or all of their 
existing label stock that does not comply with the trans fat final 
rule.
    FDA intends to notify the public, in a level 1 guidance document 
issued under the good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115), of 
the factors it intends to consider in granting or denying such requests 
and the process businesses may use to request the agency's 
consideration for enforcement discretion on trans fat labeling 
requirements. At a later date, FDA will announce the availability of a 
guidance entitled ``Guidance for Requesting an Extension to Use 
Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of 
January 1, 2006.'' The guidance will provide voluntary recommendations 
on the process for firms that wish to request an extension to use 
existing label stock after the effective date of the trans fat final 
rule.
    Because this guidance involves a collection of information, the PRA 
is implicated. However, the delay associated with normal PRA clearance 
procedures can reasonably be anticipated to prevent or disrupt the 
collection of information during a time period within which businesses 
would be most likely to make the request for the use of existing label 
stock before the effective date of January 1, 2006. As a result, given 
the need for immediate action, FDA requests emergency processing of 
this collection of information request.
    With respect to the following proposed collection of information, 
FDA invites comments on the following topics: (1) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
FDA's functions, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when 
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
    Title: Guidance for Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label 
Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006.
    Description: This policy provides guidance to FDA and the food 
industry about when and how businesses may request that the agency 
consider enforcement discretion for the use of some or all existing 
label stock, that does not declare trans fat labeling in compliance 
with the trans fat final rule, on products introduced into interstate 
commerce on or after the January 1, 2006, effective date.

Industry Compliance With the Trans Fat Final Rule

    The trans fat final rule affects almost all manufacturers of 
packaged, labeled food sold in the United States. FDA believes that 
most businesses, including small businesses, should not have difficulty 
meeting the January 1, 2006, effective date of the trans fat final 
rule. However, under certain circumstances some businesses may want to 
request that the agency consider an extension of time to use current 
labels that are not in compliance with the trans fat final rule. 
Therefore, the agency believes that it would be appropriate to 
consider, on a case-by-case basis, whether to exercise enforcement 
discretion on the January 1, 2006, effective date for trans fat 
labeling for some businesses that can make an appropriate showing.
    The agency intends to consider the following factors in any request 
from a firm for the agency's exercise of enforcement discretion:
     Whether products contain 0.5 gram or less trans fat;
     The explanation of why the request is being made;
     The number of existing labels that the firm is requesting 
to use;
     The dollar amount associated with the number of existing 
labels to be used; and
     The estimate of the amount of time needed, not exceeding 
12 months, to exhaust the number of existing labels the firm is 
requesting to use.
    Requests may be considered at any time before or after the January 
1, 2006, effective date of the trans fat final rule. Firms may submit 
their requests in writing to FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied 
Nutrition. Firms are encouraged to keep this letter of request for 
their records and should make a copy available for inspection to any 
officer or employee of the FDA who requests it. FDA intends to use the 
information in the letter to make decisions about whether a firm's 
product is subject to FDA's enforcement discretion for the trans fat 
labeling requirements.
    FDA estimates the burden of the collection of information as 
follows:

                                 Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Annual
       Activity              No. of         Frequency per     Total Annual        Hours per        Total Hours
                           Respondents        Response          Responses         Response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Written requests to                   56                 1                56                 5               280
 FDA in year one
-----------------------
Written requests to                   28                 1                28                 5               140
 FDA in year two
-----------------------
Onetime burden hours for years one and two                                                                   420
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    FDA estimates a 2-year time period during which these requests will 
be made following the issuance of this guidance. Beyond 2 years, FDA 
expects businesses to fully comply with the trans fat final rule, as it 
is unlikely that there will still be old labeling stock left to use.

[[Page 52110]]

    FDA expects that, although all sizes of business are eligible, 
small businesses and very small businesses are the firms most likely to 
be able to demonstrate a need to request an extension to the trans fat 
labeling deadline. The agency has already received three requests from 
businesses regarding the trans fat labeling compliance date of January 
1, 2006. Because small businesses are more likely to submit requests 
for extensions, and most of the affected businesses are small, we use 
the number of small businesses as the base to calculate the reporting 
burden. The regulatory flexibility analysis of the trans fat final rule 
estimated that 11,180 small businesses will have to revise the label on 
their products as a result of the trans fat final rule. Given that only 
three businesses have submitted requests to FDA so far, FDA estimates 
that, in the first year following the issuance of the guidance, the 
total number of businesses that will request a labeling compliance 
extension from FDA can be estimated as approximately 0.5 percent of the 
number of small businesses, which equals 56.
    FDA estimates that it will take one employee approximately 4 hours 
to put together a request to FDA and approximately 1 hour for a 
supervisor to look over the request before submitting it to the agency. 
Thus, each firm submitting a compliance extension request will need 5 
hours of employee time to complete the request. Given that 56 
businesses are expected to submit written requests in year one, the 
total burden hours for year one are 280.
    In year two, FDA expects about one-half as many firms to request a 
labeling compliance extension. So for year two, 28 firms are expected 
to file a request for an extension to the labeling compliance date. 
Again, assuming that it will take 5 hours to complete each request, the 
total burden hours for year two will be 140.

    Dated: August 26, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-17413 Filed 8-29-05; 2:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.