Agency Emergency Processing Under Office of Management and Budget Review; Guidance for Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006, 52108-52110 [05-17413]
Download as PDF
52108
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 169 / Thursday, September 1, 2005 / Notices
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Therefore, we are not preparing an
analysis for the RFA.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the
Social Security Act (the Act) requires us
to prepare a regulatory impact analysis
if a rule may have a significant impact
on the operations of a substantial
number of small rural hospitals. This
analysis must conform to the provisions
of section 604 of the RFA. For purposes
of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define
a small rural hospital as a hospital that
is located outside of a Metropolitan
Statistical Area and has fewer than 100
beds. We have determined that this
notice will not have a significant effect
on the operations of a substantial
number of small rural hospitals.
Therefore, we are not preparing an
analysis for section 1102(b) of the Act.
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also
requires that agencies assess anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule that may result in expenditures in
any 1 year by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $110 million. This
notice has no consequential effect on
State, local, or tribal governments or on
the private sector.
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it publishes a rule that
imposes substantial direct requirement
costs on State and local governments,
preempts State law, or otherwise has
Federalism implications. This notice
will not have a substantial effect on
State or local governments. There are no
other alternatives at this time.
In accordance with the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, this notice was
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Authority: Sections 1102 and 1871 of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and
1395hh).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.774, Medicare—
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: May 17, 2005.
Mark B. McClellan,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
Approved: August 25, 2005.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–17278 Filed 8–26–05; 9:46 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Food and Drug Administration
Family and Youth Services Bureau;
Positive Youth Development State and
Local Collaboration Demonstration
Projects
Agency Emergency Processing Under
Office of Management and Budget
Review; Guidance for Requesting an
Extension to Use Existing Label Stock
After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective
Date of January 1, 2006
Family and Youth Services
Bureau, Administration for Children
and Families (ACF), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Award announcement.
AGENCY:
CFDA#: The Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for
this program is 93.623. The title is the
Positive Youth Development State and
Local Collaboration Demonstration
Projects.
Legislative Authority: Grants for
Runaway and Homeless Youth programs
are authorized by the Runaway and
Homeless Youth Act (title III of the
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention Act of 1974), as amended by
the Missing, Exploited, and Runaway
Children Protection Act of 1999, (Pub.
L. 106–71).
Amount of Award: $100,000 per
grantee.
Project Period: 9/30/04–9/29/05.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
noncompetitive grant supplement is
being made to the following state
agencies: State of Nebraska Health &
Human Services, University of
Kentucky Research Foundation, State of
Oregon, New York Office of Children &
Family Services, State of Louisiana,
Iowa Dept. of Human Rights Criminal &
Juvenile Justice, Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, Illinois Department of
Human Services, Governor’s Office for
Children Youth & Families. The purpose
of this supplement is to support
collaborations between state-level
agencies and local community
jurisdictions regarding positive
development opportunities available to
young people as approved in their
original planning grant.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Administration for Children and
Families, Family and Youth Services
Bureau, 330 C Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20447, Courtney Workman—(202)
205–8657, cworkman@acf.hhs.gov.
Dated: August 22, 2005.
Joan E. Ohl,
Commissioner, Administration on Children,
Youth and Families.
[FR Doc. 05–17371 Filed 8–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:30 Aug 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Docket No. 2005N–0343]
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for emergency processing under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA). FDA is preparing a guidance
document to notify the public of
procedures being implemented by the
agency to assist firms that wish to
request, on a case-by-case basis upon an
appropriate showing, an extension to
use existing label stock after the
effective date of the trans fat labeling
final rule. This notice solicits comments
on the proposed collection of
information associated with the
guidance document entitled ‘‘Guidance
for Requesting an Extension to Use
Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat
Labeling Effective Date of January 1,
2006.’’
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by October 3,
2005. FDA is requesting approval of this
emergency processing by September 8,
2005.
ADDRESSES: OMB is still experiencing
significant delays in the regular mail,
including first class and express mail,
and messenger deliveries are not being
accepted. To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that comments be
faxed to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Fumie
Yokota, Desk Officer for FDA, FAX:
202–395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peggy Robbins, Office of Management
Programs (HFA–250), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–1223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA has
requested emergency processing of this
proposed collection of information
under section 3507(j) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3507(j)) and 5 CFR 1320.13. FDA
issued a final rule (the trans fat final
rule) on July 11, 2003 (68 FR 41434) to
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
52109
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 169 / Thursday, September 1, 2005 / Notices
require food labels to bear the gram
amount of trans fat without a percent
Daily Value (% DV) directly under the
saturated fat line on the Nutrition Facts
panel (https://www.cfsan.fda.gov/
~acrobat/fr03711a.pdf). The trans fat
final rule amended paragraph (c)(2) of
§ 101.9 Nutrition Labeling of Food (21
CFR 101.9). The effective date for the
trans fat final rule is January 1, 2006.
However, FDA has been advised by
some businesses that they may
experience hardship in revising their
labels in time to meet the compliance
date for trans fat labeling. Therefore, the
agency believes that it would be
appropriate to consider, on a case-bycase basis upon an appropriate showing,
whether to exercise enforcement
discretion with respect to the January 1,
2006, effective date for trans fat labeling
for some businesses, so that these
businesses would have the option of
using some or all of their existing label
stock that does not comply with the
trans fat final rule.
FDA intends to notify the public, in
a level 1 guidance document issued
under the good guidance practices
regulation (21 CFR 10.115), of the
factors it intends to consider in granting
or denying such requests and the
process businesses may use to request
the agency’s consideration for
enforcement discretion on trans fat
labeling requirements. At a later date,
FDA will announce the availability of a
guidance entitled ‘‘Guidance for
Requesting an Extension to Use Existing
Label Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling
Effective Date of January 1, 2006.’’ The
guidance will provide voluntary
recommendations on the process for
firms that wish to request an extension
to use existing label stock after the
effective date of the trans fat final rule.
Because this guidance involves a
collection of information, the PRA is
implicated. However, the delay
associated with normal PRA clearance
procedures can reasonably be
anticipated to prevent or disrupt the
collection of information during a time
period within which businesses would
be most likely to make the request for
the use of existing label stock before the
effective date of January 1, 2006. As a
result, given the need for immediate
action, FDA requests emergency
processing of this collection of
information request.
With respect to the following
proposed collection of information, FDA
invites comments on the following
topics: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of FDA’s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Title: Guidance for Requesting an
Extension to Use Existing Label Stock
After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective
Date of January 1, 2006.
Description: This policy provides
guidance to FDA and the food industry
about when and how businesses may
request that the agency consider
enforcement discretion for the use of
some or all existing label stock, that
does not declare trans fat labeling in
compliance with the trans fat final rule,
on products introduced into interstate
commerce on or after the January 1,
2006, effective date.
Industry Compliance With the Trans
Fat Final Rule
The trans fat final rule affects almost
all manufacturers of packaged, labeled
food sold in the United States. FDA
believes that most businesses, including
small businesses, should not have
difficulty meeting the January 1, 2006,
effective date of the trans fat final rule.
However, under certain circumstances
some businesses may want to request
that the agency consider an extension of
time to use current labels that are not in
compliance with the trans fat final rule.
Therefore, the agency believes that it
would be appropriate to consider, on a
case-by-case basis, whether to exercise
enforcement discretion on the January 1,
2006, effective date for trans fat labeling
for some businesses that can make an
appropriate showing.
The agency intends to consider the
following factors in any request from a
firm for the agency’s exercise of
enforcement discretion:
• Whether products contain 0.5 gram
or less trans fat;
• The explanation of why the request
is being made;
• The number of existing labels that
the firm is requesting to use;
• The dollar amount associated with
the number of existing labels to be used;
and
• The estimate of the amount of time
needed, not exceeding 12 months, to
exhaust the number of existing labels
the firm is requesting to use.
Requests may be considered at any
time before or after the January 1, 2006,
effective date of the trans fat final rule.
Firms may submit their requests in
writing to FDA’s Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition. Firms are
encouraged to keep this letter of request
for their records and should make a
copy available for inspection to any
officer or employee of the FDA who
requests it. FDA intends to use the
information in the letter to make
decisions about whether a firm’s
product is subject to FDA’s enforcement
discretion for the trans fat labeling
requirements.
FDA estimates the burden of the
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
Annual
Frequency per
Response
No. of
Respondents
Activity
Total Annual
Responses
Hours per
Response
Total Hours
Written requests to FDA in year one
56
1
56
5
280
Written requests to FDA in year two
28
1
28
5
140
Onetime burden hours for years one and two
1 There
420
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
FDA estimates a 2-year time period
during which these requests will be
made following the issuance of this
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:30 Aug 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
guidance. Beyond 2 years, FDA expects
businesses to fully comply with the
trans fat final rule, as it is unlikely that
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
there will still be old labeling stock left
to use.
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
52110
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 169 / Thursday, September 1, 2005 / Notices
FDA expects that, although all sizes of
business are eligible, small businesses
and very small businesses are the firms
most likely to be able to demonstrate a
need to request an extension to the trans
fat labeling deadline. The agency has
already received three requests from
businesses regarding the trans fat
labeling compliance date of January 1,
2006. Because small businesses are
more likely to submit requests for
extensions, and most of the affected
businesses are small, we use the number
of small businesses as the base to
calculate the reporting burden. The
regulatory flexibility analysis of the
trans fat final rule estimated that 11,180
small businesses will have to revise the
label on their products as a result of the
trans fat final rule. Given that only three
businesses have submitted requests to
FDA so far, FDA estimates that, in the
first year following the issuance of the
guidance, the total number of businesses
that will request a labeling compliance
extension from FDA can be estimated as
approximately 0.5 percent of the
number of small businesses, which
equals 56.
FDA estimates that it will take one
employee approximately 4 hours to put
together a request to FDA and
approximately 1 hour for a supervisor to
look over the request before submitting
it to the agency. Thus, each firm
submitting a compliance extension
request will need 5 hours of employee
time to complete the request. Given that
56 businesses are expected to submit
written requests in year one, the total
burden hours for year one are 280.
In year two, FDA expects about onehalf as many firms to request a labeling
compliance extension. So for year two,
28 firms are expected to file a request
for an extension to the labeling
compliance date. Again, assuming that
it will take 5 hours to complete each
request, the total burden hours for year
two will be 140.
Dated: August 26, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–17413 Filed 8–29–05; 2:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
General Hospital and Personal Use
Devices Panel of the Medical Devices
Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:30 Aug 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice announces a forthcoming
meeting of a public advisory committee
of the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA). The meeting will be open to the
public.
Name of Committee: General Hospital
and Personal Use Devices Panel of the
Medical Devices Advisory Committee.
General Function of the Committee:
To provide advice and
recommendations to the agency on
FDA’s regulatory issues.
Date and Time: The meeting will be
held on September 27, 2005, from 8 a.m.
to 5 p.m.
Location: Hilton Washington DC
North/Gaithersburg, Ballroom, 620 Perry
Pkwy., Gaithersburg, MD.
Contact Person: Scott Colburn, Center
for Devices and Radiological Health
(HFZ–480), Food and Drug
Administration, 9200 Corporate Blvd.,
Rockville, MD 20850, 301–594–1287,
ext. 177, or FDA Advisory Committee
Information Line, 1–800–741–8138
(301–443–0572 in the Washington, DC
area), code 3014512520. Please call the
Information Line for up-to-date
information on this meeting.
Agenda: The committee will hear a
presentation on FDA’s Critical Path
Initiative. Subsequently, the committee
will discuss and make
recommendations regarding general
issues related to the model used for
validation testing to support a claim of
decontamination of potentially
transmissible spongiform
encephalopathy (TSE)-contaminated
surgical instruments. Background
information for the topics, including the
agenda and questions for the committee,
will be available to the public 1
business day before the meeting, on the
Internet at https://www.fda.gov/cdrh/
panelmtg.html.
Procedure: Interested persons may
present data, information, or views,
orally or in writing, on issues pending
before the committee. Written
submissions may be made to the contact
person by September 13, 2005. Oral
presentations from the public will be
scheduled for approximately 60 minutes
at the beginning of deliberations and for
approximately 30 minutes near the end
of deliberations. Time allotted for each
presentation may be limited. Those
desiring to make formal oral
presentations should notify the contact
person before September 13, 2005, and
submit a brief statement of the general
nature of the evidence or arguments
they wish to present, the names and
addresses of proposed participants, and
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
an indication of the approximate time
requested to make their presentation.
Persons attending FDA’s advisory
committee meetings are advised that the
agency is not responsible for providing
access to electrical outlets.
FDA welcomes the attendance of the
public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to
accommodate persons with physical
disabilities or special needs. If you
require special accommodations due to
a disability, please contact AnnMarie
Willliams at 240–276–0450, ext. 113, at
least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
Notice of this meeting is given under
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app. 2).
Dated: August 23, 2005.
Scott Gottlieb,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–17412 Filed 8–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Advisory Commission on Childhood
Vaccines; Notice of Meeting
Health Resources and Services
Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice; amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Health Resources and
Services Administration is amending a
notice that appeared in the Federal
Register of August 22, 2005 (70 FR
48962–48963) announcing an Advisory
Commission on Childhood Vaccines
meeting on September 14, 2005. The
document announced that the public
can join the meeting by attending in
person or by audio conference call. The
meeting will now be held by audio
conference call only. This document
amends the notice by changing the place
of the meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Cheryl Lee at 301–443–2124 or e-mail
clee@hrsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc.
05–16502, beginning on page 48962 in
the Federal Register of Monday, August
22, 2005, make the following
amendment on page 48963 in the third
paragraph: Change place of meeting to
Audio Conference Call.
Dated: August 25, 2005.
Tina M. Cheatham,
Director, Division of Policy Review and
Coordination.
[FR Doc. 05–17379 Filed 8–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 169 (Thursday, September 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52108-52110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17413]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2005N-0343]
Agency Emergency Processing Under Office of Management and Budget
Review; Guidance for Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label
Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for emergency processing under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA). FDA is preparing a guidance
document to notify the public of procedures being implemented by the
agency to assist firms that wish to request, on a case-by-case basis
upon an appropriate showing, an extension to use existing label stock
after the effective date of the trans fat labeling final rule. This
notice solicits comments on the proposed collection of information
associated with the guidance document entitled ``Guidance for
Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat
Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006.''
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by October
3, 2005. FDA is requesting approval of this emergency processing by
September 8, 2005.
ADDRESSES: OMB is still experiencing significant delays in the regular
mail, including first class and express mail, and messenger deliveries
are not being accepted. To ensure that comments on the information
collection are received, OMB recommends that comments be faxed to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Fumie Yokota,
Desk Officer for FDA, FAX: 202-395-6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Robbins, Office of Management
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA has requested emergency processing of
this proposed collection of information under section 3507(j) of the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507(j)) and 5 CFR 1320.13. FDA issued a final rule (the
trans fat final rule) on July 11, 2003 (68 FR 41434) to
[[Page 52109]]
require food labels to bear the gram amount of trans fat without a
percent Daily Value (% DV) directly under the saturated fat line on the
Nutrition Facts panel (https://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~acrobat/fr03711a.pdf).
The trans fat final rule amended paragraph (c)(2) of Sec. 101.9
Nutrition Labeling of Food (21 CFR 101.9). The effective date for the
trans fat final rule is January 1, 2006. However, FDA has been advised
by some businesses that they may experience hardship in revising their
labels in time to meet the compliance date for trans fat labeling.
Therefore, the agency believes that it would be appropriate to
consider, on a case-by-case basis upon an appropriate showing, whether
to exercise enforcement discretion with respect to the January 1, 2006,
effective date for trans fat labeling for some businesses, so that
these businesses would have the option of using some or all of their
existing label stock that does not comply with the trans fat final
rule.
FDA intends to notify the public, in a level 1 guidance document
issued under the good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115), of
the factors it intends to consider in granting or denying such requests
and the process businesses may use to request the agency's
consideration for enforcement discretion on trans fat labeling
requirements. At a later date, FDA will announce the availability of a
guidance entitled ``Guidance for Requesting an Extension to Use
Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of
January 1, 2006.'' The guidance will provide voluntary recommendations
on the process for firms that wish to request an extension to use
existing label stock after the effective date of the trans fat final
rule.
Because this guidance involves a collection of information, the PRA
is implicated. However, the delay associated with normal PRA clearance
procedures can reasonably be anticipated to prevent or disrupt the
collection of information during a time period within which businesses
would be most likely to make the request for the use of existing label
stock before the effective date of January 1, 2006. As a result, given
the need for immediate action, FDA requests emergency processing of
this collection of information request.
With respect to the following proposed collection of information,
FDA invites comments on the following topics: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
FDA's functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Title: Guidance for Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label
Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006.
Description: This policy provides guidance to FDA and the food
industry about when and how businesses may request that the agency
consider enforcement discretion for the use of some or all existing
label stock, that does not declare trans fat labeling in compliance
with the trans fat final rule, on products introduced into interstate
commerce on or after the January 1, 2006, effective date.
Industry Compliance With the Trans Fat Final Rule
The trans fat final rule affects almost all manufacturers of
packaged, labeled food sold in the United States. FDA believes that
most businesses, including small businesses, should not have difficulty
meeting the January 1, 2006, effective date of the trans fat final
rule. However, under certain circumstances some businesses may want to
request that the agency consider an extension of time to use current
labels that are not in compliance with the trans fat final rule.
Therefore, the agency believes that it would be appropriate to
consider, on a case-by-case basis, whether to exercise enforcement
discretion on the January 1, 2006, effective date for trans fat
labeling for some businesses that can make an appropriate showing.
The agency intends to consider the following factors in any request
from a firm for the agency's exercise of enforcement discretion:
Whether products contain 0.5 gram or less trans fat;
The explanation of why the request is being made;
The number of existing labels that the firm is requesting
to use;
The dollar amount associated with the number of existing
labels to be used; and
The estimate of the amount of time needed, not exceeding
12 months, to exhaust the number of existing labels the firm is
requesting to use.
Requests may be considered at any time before or after the January
1, 2006, effective date of the trans fat final rule. Firms may submit
their requests in writing to FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition. Firms are encouraged to keep this letter of request for
their records and should make a copy available for inspection to any
officer or employee of the FDA who requests it. FDA intends to use the
information in the letter to make decisions about whether a firm's
product is subject to FDA's enforcement discretion for the trans fat
labeling requirements.
FDA estimates the burden of the collection of information as
follows:
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual
Activity No. of Frequency per Total Annual Hours per Total Hours
Respondents Response Responses Response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Written requests to 56 1 56 5 280
FDA in year one
-----------------------
Written requests to 28 1 28 5 140
FDA in year two
-----------------------
Onetime burden hours for years one and two 420
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
FDA estimates a 2-year time period during which these requests will
be made following the issuance of this guidance. Beyond 2 years, FDA
expects businesses to fully comply with the trans fat final rule, as it
is unlikely that there will still be old labeling stock left to use.
[[Page 52110]]
FDA expects that, although all sizes of business are eligible,
small businesses and very small businesses are the firms most likely to
be able to demonstrate a need to request an extension to the trans fat
labeling deadline. The agency has already received three requests from
businesses regarding the trans fat labeling compliance date of January
1, 2006. Because small businesses are more likely to submit requests
for extensions, and most of the affected businesses are small, we use
the number of small businesses as the base to calculate the reporting
burden. The regulatory flexibility analysis of the trans fat final rule
estimated that 11,180 small businesses will have to revise the label on
their products as a result of the trans fat final rule. Given that only
three businesses have submitted requests to FDA so far, FDA estimates
that, in the first year following the issuance of the guidance, the
total number of businesses that will request a labeling compliance
extension from FDA can be estimated as approximately 0.5 percent of the
number of small businesses, which equals 56.
FDA estimates that it will take one employee approximately 4 hours
to put together a request to FDA and approximately 1 hour for a
supervisor to look over the request before submitting it to the agency.
Thus, each firm submitting a compliance extension request will need 5
hours of employee time to complete the request. Given that 56
businesses are expected to submit written requests in year one, the
total burden hours for year one are 280.
In year two, FDA expects about one-half as many firms to request a
labeling compliance extension. So for year two, 28 firms are expected
to file a request for an extension to the labeling compliance date.
Again, assuming that it will take 5 hours to complete each request, the
total burden hours for year two will be 140.
Dated: August 26, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-17413 Filed 8-29-05; 2:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S