TRICARE; Revision of Participating Providers Reimbursement Rate; TRICARE Dental Program (TDP), 51692-51694 [05-17299]
Download as PDF
51692
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federallyrecognized Indian tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
This determination is based on the fact
that the Texas program does not regulate
coal exploration and surface coal
mining and reclamation operations on
Indian lands. Therefore, the Texas
program has no effect on Federallyrecognized Indian tribes.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:22 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) Does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact
that the State submittal, which is the
subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 943
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: August 17, 2005.
Ervin J. Barchenger,
Acting Regional Director, Mid-Continent
Region.
[FR Doc. 05–17337 Filed 8–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
RIN 0720–AA92
TRICARE; Revision of Participating
Providers Reimbursement Rate;
TRICARE Dental Program (TDP)
Office of the Secretary, DoD.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department is publishing
this proposed rule to revise the
requirements and procedures for the
reimbursement of TRICARE Dental
Program participating providers.
Participating providers will no longer be
reimbursed at the equivalent of a
percentile of prevailing charges
sufficiently above the 50th percentile of
prevailing charges made for similar
services in the same locality (region) or
state, or the provider’s actual charge,
whichever is lower, less any cost-share
amount due for authorized services.
Specifically, the revision will require
TRICARE Dental Program participating
providers to be reimbursed in
accordance with the contractor’s
network agreements, less any cost-share
amount due for authorized services.
Public comments are invited and will
be considered for possible revisions to
the final rule.
DATES: Written comments received at
the address indicated below by October
31, 2005 will be accepted.
ADDRESSES: Because of staff and
resource limitations, we can only accept
comments by mail or electronic bill (email). We are unable to accept
comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission. Send e-mail comments to
TDP.rule@tma.osd.mil. Mail written
comments to the following address only:
TRICARE Management Activity,
TRICARE Operations/Dental Division,
Skyline 5, Suite 810, 5111 Leesburg
Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–3206;
Attention: Col. Gary C. Martin, Director.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules
comments to be timely received in the
event of delivery delays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Col.
Gary C. Martin, Office of the Assistant
Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs)/
TRICARE Management Activity,
telephone (703) 681–0039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Revision of Participating Providers
Reimbursement Rate. Currently, 32 CFR
199.13 requires the TRICARE Dental
Program contractor to reimburse
participating providers at the equivalent
of a percentile of prevailing charges
sufficiently above the 50th percentile of
prevailing charges made for similar
services in the same locality (region) or
state, or the provider’s actual charge,
whichever is lower, less any cost-share
amount due for authorized services.
This provision was included in the
regulation to constitute a significant
financial incentive for participation of
providers in the contractor’s network
and to ensure a network of quality
providers through use of a higher
reimbursement rate. This provision,
however, places an unnecessary
restriction on contractors that already
have established, high quality provider
networks with reimbursement rates
below the 50th percentile that are of
sufficient size to meet the access
requirements of the TRICARE Dental
Program. The reimbursement rates that
have been negotiated over the life of the
dental contract represent the general
market rates for dental insurance
reimbursement, and the proposed rule
change would bring DoD reimbursement
rates into line with the broader
insurance market. Elimination of the
50th percentile requirement will afford
the Government and enrollees
significant cost savings through lower
provider reimbursement costs by the
contractor. Additionally, contractors
have other methods available to ensure
the TDP members receive high quality
dental services. These quality assurance
methods include, but are not limited to,
licensing and credentialing standards,
patient satisfaction assessments, and
provider trend analyses.
II. Regulatory Procedures
The Department of Defense (DoD) has
examined the economic implications of
this proposed rule as required by
Executive Order 12866. Executive Order
12866 directs agencies to assess costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:22 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). Executive Order
12866 classifies a rule as significant if
it meets any one of a number of
specified conditions, including: having
an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, adversely affecting a
sector of the economy in a material way,
adversely affecting competition, or
adversely affecting jobs. A regulation is
also considered a significant regulatory
action if it raises novel legal or policy
issues.
DoD concludes that this proposed rule
is a significant regulatory action under
the Executive Order since it raises novel
policy issues under Section 3(f)(4). DoD
concludes, however, that this proposed
rule does not meet the significance
threshold of $100 million effect on the
economy in any one year under Section
3(f)(1), with an estimated annual impact
on the economy of $5 million (See
attachment for details). The estimate
annual impact was determined by
comparing the current level of
reimbursement for network dental
providers in the TDP with the expected
level of reimbursement under this
Proposed Rule. The current rate of
reimbursement was assessed by
independent actuarial advisers. This
rate is consistent with a market-driven
level of payments that is necessary, on
average, to maintain a large and stable
network of dentists. The difference was
multiplied by the projected level of
utilization for network providers in
2006. In the aggregate, for all network
TDP providers, the Proposed Rule is
estimated to reduce network dental
provider payments by $0–5 million in
2006. For the approximately 70,000
network dental providers, this impact
averages $0–$70 per year per network
dentist, which is less than 0.1 percent
of the net income for the dentists in the
U.S. (according to the American Dental
Association’s 2002 Survey of Dental
Practice). Although the average impact
is minimal, the upper end of the range
for a network dentist is estimated to be
as much as $1,700 per year. This
assumes a decline of 2 percent in the
reimbursement level for a network
dentist whose practice consists of 15
percent TDP patients. The level of
reimbursement required to have a stable
network of providers is a percentile less
than the current percentile of billed
charges.
The Congressional Review Act
establishes certain procedures for major
rules, defined as those with similar
major impacts. The Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that each
Federal agency prepare, and make
available for public comment, a
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51693
regulatory flexibility analysis when the
agency issues a regulation that would
have significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This is not a
major rule under 5 U.S.C. 801. It is a
significant regulatory action but not
economically significant. In addition,
we certify that this proposed rule will
not significantly affect a substantial
number of small entities for the reasons
stated above. This rule has been
designated and has been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget as
required under the provision of E.O.
12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains a new
information collection requirement.
DoD has submitted the following
proposal to OMB under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35). Comments are
invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of DoD, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the estimate of the
burden of the proposed information
collection; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
information collection on respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Title: Claim Form.
Type of Request: New requirement.
Number of Respondents: 56,512.
Responses Per Respondent: 62.
Annual Responses: 3,503,744.
Average Burden Per Response: 15
minutes.
Annual Burden Hours: 875,936.
Needs and Uses: The TRICARE
Management Activity (TMA) under the
authority of the Office of the Assistant
Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs)/
TMA Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Defense has the
responsibility for management of the
TRICARE dental program as established
in Title X, United States Code, section
1076a. The TDP claim form is required
to gather information to make payment
for legitimate dental claims, to assist in
contractor surveillance and program
integrity investigations and to audit
financial transactions where the
Department of Defense has a financial
stake. The information from the claim
form is also used to provide important
cost share explanations to the
beneficiary.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Frequency: 5 per month.
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
51694
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed
information collection should be sent to
the TRICARE Management Activity,
Attn: Col Gary Martin, 5111 Leesburg
Pike, Suite 810, Falls Church, VA
22041–3206 (703–681–0039). Comments
should be received within 60 days of
publication of this notice.
To request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposed and
associated collection instruments,
please write to TRICARE Management
Activity, Attn: Col Gary Martin, 5111
Leesburg Pike, Suite 810, Falls Church,
VA 22041–3206, or telephone Col
Martin at 703–681–0039.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental health, Health care,
Health insurance, Individuals with
disabilities, Military personnel.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 32 CFR part 199 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 199—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 199
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. Chapter
55.
2. Section 199.13(g)(2)(ii) is proposed
to be revised to read as follows:
§ 199.13
TRICARE Dental Program.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Participating providers shall be
reimbursed in accordance with the
contractor’s network agreements, less
any cost-share amount due for
authorized services.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 25, 2005.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05–17299 Filed 8–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:22 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 51
[OAR–2005–0148; FRL–7963–1]
Advance Notice To Solicit Comments,
Data and Information for Determining
the Emissions Reductions Achieved in
Ozone Nonattainment and
Maintenance Areas From the
Implementation of Rules Limiting the
VOC Content of AIM Coatings
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: By this action, EPA is
soliciting comments, data and
information for determining how to
calculate the reductions in volatile
organic compounds (VOC) emissions
achieved in ozone nonattainment and
maintenance areas from the
implementation of rules which limit the
VOC content of architectural coatings
(commonly referred to as architectural
industrial maintenance, or AIM,
coatings). In addition to submitting
comments, data and information,
interested parties may also request to
meet with EPA to present their
recommended approaches and
rationales.
DATES: Please submit comments, data,
and information on or before October
17, 2005. Requests to meet with EPA
should be made on or before September
30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit your written
comments, data and information,
identified by Docket ID No. OAR–2005–
0148, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://www.epa.gov/
edocket. EDOCKET, EPA’s electronic
public docket and comment system, is
EPA’s preferred method for receiving
comments. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: Send electronic mail (e-mail)
to EPA Docket Center at a-and-rDocket@epa.gov.
Fax: Send faxes to the EPA Docket
Center at (202) 566–1741.
Mail: Air and Radiation Docket, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Attn: Docket ID No. OAR–2005–0148,
Advance Notice for Information on
Determining the Emissions Reductions
Achieved from Limiting the VOC
Content of Architectural Coating. Please
include a total of two copies.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Hand Delivery or Courier: EPA Docket
Center (Air and Radiation Docket), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
West Building, Room B102, 1301
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20004. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket’s normal
hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
delivery of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. OAR–2005–0148. The
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.epa.gov/edocket, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through EDOCKET,
regulations.gov or e-mail. The EPA
EDOCKET and the federal
regulations.gov websites are
‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
EDOCKET or regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
EDOCKET index at https://www.epa.gov/
edocket. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in
EDOCKET or in hard copy during
normal business hours at the Air and
Radiation Docket, (EPA/DC) EPA West,
Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 31, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51692-51694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17299]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
RIN 0720-AA92
TRICARE; Revision of Participating Providers Reimbursement Rate;
TRICARE Dental Program (TDP)
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department is publishing this proposed rule to revise the
requirements and procedures for the reimbursement of TRICARE Dental
Program participating providers. Participating providers will no longer
be reimbursed at the equivalent of a percentile of prevailing charges
sufficiently above the 50th percentile of prevailing charges made for
similar services in the same locality (region) or state, or the
provider's actual charge, whichever is lower, less any cost-share
amount due for authorized services. Specifically, the revision will
require TRICARE Dental Program participating providers to be reimbursed
in accordance with the contractor's network agreements, less any cost-
share amount due for authorized services.
Public comments are invited and will be considered for possible
revisions to the final rule.
DATES: Written comments received at the address indicated below by
October 31, 2005 will be accepted.
ADDRESSES: Because of staff and resource limitations, we can only
accept comments by mail or electronic bill (e-mail). We are unable to
accept comments by facsimile (FAX) transmission. Send e-mail comments
to TDP.rule@tma.osd.mil. Mail written comments to the following address
only: TRICARE Management Activity, TRICARE Operations/Dental Division,
Skyline 5, Suite 810, 5111 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3206;
Attention: Col. Gary C. Martin, Director. Please allow sufficient time
for mailed
[[Page 51693]]
comments to be timely received in the event of delivery delays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Col. Gary C. Martin, Office of the
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs)/TRICARE Management
Activity, telephone (703) 681-0039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Revision of Participating Providers Reimbursement Rate. Currently,
32 CFR 199.13 requires the TRICARE Dental Program contractor to
reimburse participating providers at the equivalent of a percentile of
prevailing charges sufficiently above the 50th percentile of prevailing
charges made for similar services in the same locality (region) or
state, or the provider's actual charge, whichever is lower, less any
cost-share amount due for authorized services. This provision was
included in the regulation to constitute a significant financial
incentive for participation of providers in the contractor's network
and to ensure a network of quality providers through use of a higher
reimbursement rate. This provision, however, places an unnecessary
restriction on contractors that already have established, high quality
provider networks with reimbursement rates below the 50th percentile
that are of sufficient size to meet the access requirements of the
TRICARE Dental Program. The reimbursement rates that have been
negotiated over the life of the dental contract represent the general
market rates for dental insurance reimbursement, and the proposed rule
change would bring DoD reimbursement rates into line with the broader
insurance market. Elimination of the 50th percentile requirement will
afford the Government and enrollees significant cost savings through
lower provider reimbursement costs by the contractor. Additionally,
contractors have other methods available to ensure the TDP members
receive high quality dental services. These quality assurance methods
include, but are not limited to, licensing and credentialing standards,
patient satisfaction assessments, and provider trend analyses.
II. Regulatory Procedures
The Department of Defense (DoD) has examined the economic
implications of this proposed rule as required by Executive Order
12866. Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive
Order 12866 classifies a rule as significant if it meets any one of a
number of specified conditions, including: having an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more, adversely affecting a sector of
the economy in a material way, adversely affecting competition, or
adversely affecting jobs. A regulation is also considered a significant
regulatory action if it raises novel legal or policy issues.
DoD concludes that this proposed rule is a significant regulatory
action under the Executive Order since it raises novel policy issues
under Section 3(f)(4). DoD concludes, however, that this proposed rule
does not meet the significance threshold of $100 million effect on the
economy in any one year under Section 3(f)(1), with an estimated annual
impact on the economy of $5 million (See attachment for details). The
estimate annual impact was determined by comparing the current level of
reimbursement for network dental providers in the TDP with the expected
level of reimbursement under this Proposed Rule. The current rate of
reimbursement was assessed by independent actuarial advisers. This rate
is consistent with a market-driven level of payments that is necessary,
on average, to maintain a large and stable network of dentists. The
difference was multiplied by the projected level of utilization for
network providers in 2006. In the aggregate, for all network TDP
providers, the Proposed Rule is estimated to reduce network dental
provider payments by $0-5 million in 2006. For the approximately 70,000
network dental providers, this impact averages $0-$70 per year per
network dentist, which is less than 0.1 percent of the net income for
the dentists in the U.S. (according to the American Dental
Association's 2002 Survey of Dental Practice). Although the average
impact is minimal, the upper end of the range for a network dentist is
estimated to be as much as $1,700 per year. This assumes a decline of 2
percent in the reimbursement level for a network dentist whose practice
consists of 15 percent TDP patients. The level of reimbursement
required to have a stable network of providers is a percentile less
than the current percentile of billed charges.
The Congressional Review Act establishes certain procedures for
major rules, defined as those with similar major impacts. The
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that each Federal agency
prepare, and make available for public comment, a regulatory
flexibility analysis when the agency issues a regulation that would
have significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. This
is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 801. It is a significant regulatory
action but not economically significant. In addition, we certify that
this proposed rule will not significantly affect a substantial number
of small entities for the reasons stated above. This rule has been
designated and has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
as required under the provision of E.O. 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains a new information collection
requirement. DoD has submitted the following proposal to OMB under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
DoD, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b)
the accuracy of the estimate of the burden of the proposed information
collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the information collection on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Title: Claim Form.
Type of Request: New requirement.
Number of Respondents: 56,512.
Responses Per Respondent: 62.
Annual Responses: 3,503,744.
Average Burden Per Response: 15 minutes.
Annual Burden Hours: 875,936.
Needs and Uses: The TRICARE Management Activity (TMA) under the
authority of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health
Affairs)/TMA Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense has
the responsibility for management of the TRICARE dental program as
established in Title X, United States Code, section 1076a. The TDP
claim form is required to gather information to make payment for
legitimate dental claims, to assist in contractor surveillance and
program integrity investigations and to audit financial transactions
where the Department of Defense has a financial stake. The information
from the claim form is also used to provide important cost share
explanations to the beneficiary.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
Frequency: 5 per month.
[[Page 51694]]
Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information
collection should be sent to the TRICARE Management Activity, Attn: Col
Gary Martin, 5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 810, Falls Church, VA 22041-3206
(703-681-0039). Comments should be received within 60 days of
publication of this notice.
To request more information on this proposed information collection
or to obtain a copy of the proposed and associated collection
instruments, please write to TRICARE Management Activity, Attn: Col
Gary Martin, 5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 810, Falls Church, VA 22041-
3206, or telephone Col Martin at 703-681-0039.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental health, Health care, Health insurance, Individuals
with disabilities, Military personnel.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 32 CFR part 199 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 199--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 199 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. Chapter 55.
2. Section 199.13(g)(2)(ii) is proposed to be revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 199.13 TRICARE Dental Program.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Participating providers shall be reimbursed in accordance with
the contractor's network agreements, less any cost-share amount due for
authorized services.
* * * * *
Dated: August 25, 2005.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05-17299 Filed 8-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M