Onions Grown in Certain Designated Counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, OR; Decreased Assessment Rate, 51578-51581 [05-17269]
Download as PDF
51578
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule relaxes container
requirements for oranges and grapefruit;
(2) the regulatory period begins
September 1 and this action should be
in effect promptly so handlers can plan
accordingly; (3) the Committee
unanimously recommended these
changes at a public meeting and
interested parties had an opportunity to
provide input; and (4) this rule provides
a 60-day comment period and any
comments received will be considered
prior to finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 906
Grapefruit, Marketing agreements,
Oranges, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 906 is amended as
follows:
PART 906—ORANGES AND
GRAPEFRUIT GROWN IN LOWER RIO
GRANDE VALLEY IN TEXAS
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 906 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
§ 906.120
[Amended]
2. In § 906.120, paragraph (c)(3)(iii),
remove the words ‘‘which are packed
level full,’’; and in paragraph (e),
remove the words ‘‘the term level full
means that the fruit is level with the top
edge of the bottom section of the
carton;’’.
I
§ 906.137
[Amended]
3. In § 906.137, paragraph (b), change
the number ‘‘51.685’’ to ‘‘51.653’’ and
the number ‘‘51.712’’ to ‘‘51.714’’.
I 4. Section 906.340 is amended as
follows:
I A. Revise paragraph (a)(1) to read as
set forth below;
I B. Amend paragraph (a)(2)(i)(A)
introductory text by removing the words
‘‘, when place packed in cartons or other
containers,’’;
I C. Amend paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(A)
introductory text by removing the words
‘‘when place packed in cartons or other
containers’’ and ‘‘and otherwise meet
the requirements of standard sizing’’;
and
I D. Amend paragraph (c) by revising
‘‘51.652’’ to read ‘‘51.653’’.
I
§ 906.340 Container, pack, and container
marking regulations.
(a) * * *
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:14 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
(1) Containers. (i) Closed fiberboard
carton with inside dimensions of 131⁄4 x
101⁄2 x 71⁄4 inches: Provided, That the
container has a Mullen or Cady test of
at least 200 pounds;
(ii) Closed fully telescopic fiberboard
carton with inside dimensions of 161⁄2 x
103⁄4 x 91⁄2 inches;
(iii) Closed fiberboard carton with
inside dimensions of 20 x 131⁄4 inches
and a depth from 93⁄4 to 13 inches:
Provided, That the container has a
Mullen or Cady test of at least 250
pounds: And Provided further, That the
container may be used to pack any poly
or mesh bags authorized in this section;
(iv) Poly or mesh bags having a
capacity of four, five, eight, ten, or 18
pounds of fruit: Provided, That only
oranges are to be packed in the fourpound bag.
(v) Rectangular or octagonal bulk
fiberboard crib with approximate
dimensions of 46 to 471⁄2 inches in
length, 37 to 38 inches in width, and 36
inches in height: Provided, That this
container has a Mullen or Cady test of
at least 1,300 pounds, and that it is used
only once for the shipment of citrus
fruit: And Provided further, That the
container may be used to pack any poly
or mesh bags authorized in this section,
or bulk fruit.
(vi) Rectangular or octagonal 2⁄3
fiberboard crib with approximate
dimensions of 46 to 471⁄2 inches in
length, 37 to 38 inches in width, and 24
inches in height: Provided, That the crib
has a Mullen or Cady test of at least
1,300 pounds, and that it is used only
once for the shipment of citrus fruit:
And Provided further, That the
container may be used to pack any poly
or mesh bags authorized in this section,
or bulk fruit.
(vii) Octagonal fiberboard crib with
approximate dimensions of 46 to 471⁄2
inches in width, 37 to 38 inches in
depth, and 26 to 261⁄2 inches in height:
Provided, That the crib has a Mullen or
Cady test of at least 1,300 pounds, and
that it is used only once for the
shipment of citrus fruit: And Provided
further, That the crib may be used to
pack any poly or mesh bags authorized
in this section, or bulk fruit.
(viii) Fiberboard box holding two
layers of fruit, with approximate
dimensions of 23 inches in length, 151⁄2
inches in width, and 7 inches in depth;
(ix) Fiberboard box with approximate
dimensions of 15 inches in length, 11
inches in width, and 71⁄2 inches in
depth;
(x) Fiberboard box with approximate
dimensions of 253⁄4 inches in length, 15
inches in width, and 83⁄8 to 101⁄2 inches
in depth;
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(xi) Reusable collapsible plastic
container with approximate dimensions
of 23 inches in length, 15 inches in
width, and 7 to 11 inches in depth;
(xii) Reusable collapsible plastic
container with approximate dimensions
of 141⁄4 x 103⁄4 x 63⁄4 inches;
(xiii) Reusable collapsible plastic bin
with approximate dimensions of 363⁄4 x
443⁄4 x 27 inches;
(xiv) Octagonal bulk triple wall
fiberboard crib with approximate
dimensions of 373⁄4 inches in length, 25
inches in width, and 25 inches in
height: Provided, That the container has
a Mullen or Cady test of at least 1,100
pounds: And Provided further, That the
container may be used to pack any poly
or mesh bags authorized in this section,
or bulk fruit;
(xv) Closed fiberboard carton with
approximate dimensions of 161⁄2 inches
in length, 103⁄4 inches in width, and
615⁄16 inches in height: Provided, That
the container has a Mullen or Cady test
of at least 200 pounds;
(xvi) Such types and sizes of
containers as may be approved by the
committee for testing in connection
with a research project conducted by or
in cooperation with the committee:
Provided, That the handling of each lot
of fruit in such test containers shall be
subject to prior approval and under the
supervision of the committee.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 26, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–17321 Filed 8–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 958
[Docket No. FV05–958–1 FIR]
Onions Grown in Certain Designated
Counties in Idaho, and Malheur
County, OR; Decreased Assessment
Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
final rule which decreased the
assessment rate established for the
Idaho-Eastern Oregon Onion Committee
(Committee) for the 2005–2006 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $0.105 to
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
$0.10 per hundredweight of onions
handled. The Committee locally
administers the marketing order which
regulates the handling of onions grown
in designated counties in Idaho, and
Malheur County, Oregon. Authorization
to assess onion handlers enables the
Committee to incur expenses that are
reasonable and necessary to administer
the program. The fiscal period began
July 1 and ends June 30. The assessment
rate will remain in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or
terminated.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 30, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan M. Hiller, Northwest Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (503) 326–2724, Fax: (503)
326–7440; or George Kelhart, Technical
Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
No. 130 and Marketing Order No. 958,
both as amended (7 CFR part 958),
regulating the handling of onions grown
in designated counties in Idaho, and
Malheur County, Oregon, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion
handlers are subject to assessments.
Funds to administer the order are
derived from such assessments. It is
intended that the assessment rate as
issued herein will be applicable to all
assessable onions beginning July 1,
2005, and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:14 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
rate established for the Committee for
the 2005–2006 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $0.105 per hundredweight
to $0.10 per hundredweight of onions
handled.
The Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion
marketing order provides authority for
the Committee, with the approval of
USDA, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The
members of the Committee are
producers and handlers of Idaho-Eastern
Oregon onions. They are familiar with
the Committee’s needs and with the
costs for goods and services in their
local area and are thus in a position to
formulate an appropriate budget and
assessment rate. The assessment rate is
formulated and discussed in a public
meeting. Thus, all directly affected
persons have an opportunity to
participate and provide input.
For the 2004–2005 and subsequent
fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and USDA approved, an
assessment rate that would continue in
effect from fiscal period to fiscal period
unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by USDA upon
recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on April 14, 2005,
and unanimously recommended 2005–
2006 expenditures of $956,001 and an
assessment rate of $0.10 per
hundredweight of onions. In
comparison, last year’s budgeted
expenditures were $997,442. The
assessment rate of $0.10 is $0.005 lower
than the previous rate. The decreased
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51579
assessment rate recommended by the
Committee reflects the reduction in
anticipated expenditures.
Both producers and handlers in the
regulated production area expressed a
need to decrease the assessment rate to
help offset the lower prices received by
handlers. The National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) reported in the
Vegetables 2004 Summary, published in
January 2005, that the 2004 average
F.O.B. price for the Idaho-Eastern
Oregon onions was $8.14 per
hundredweight. That price is $1.42
below the three year average F.O.B.
price of $9.56 per hundredweight for
this production area. The Committee
considered assessment rates lower than
$0.10 per hundredweight; however, it
determined that the lower rates would
not generate the income necessary to
sustain the current level of programs
desired by the industry.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2005–2006 year include $10,000 for
committee expenses, $104,371 for salary
expenses, $81,160 for travel/office
expenses, $62,470 for production
research expenses, $32,000 for export
market development expenses, $616,000
for promotion expenses, and $50,000 for
unforeseen marketing order
contingencies. Budgeted expenses for
these items in 2004–2005 were $10,000
$13,482, $81,960, $60,000, $32,000,
$600,000, and $50,000, respectively.
The Committee based its
recommended assessment rate decrease
on the 2005–2006 crop estimate, the
2005–2006 program expenditure needs,
and the current and projected size of its
monetary reserve. The Committee
estimated onion shipments for 2005–
2006 at 8,464,000 hundredweight which
should provide $846,400 in assessment
income. Income derived from handler
assessments, along with contributions
($73,600), interest income ($7,400),
other income ($2,000), and funds from
the Committee’s authorized reserve
($26,601), should be adequate to cover
budgeted expenses. The Committee
estimates that its operating reserve will
be approximately $596,074 at the end of
the 2005–2006 fiscal period. Funds in
the reserve will be kept within the
maximum permitted by the order of
approximately one fiscal year’s
operational expenses (§ 958.44).
The assessment rate will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate is
effective for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
51580
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
to or during each fiscal period to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking will be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s 2005–2006 budget and
those for subsequent fiscal periods will
be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 233
producers of onions in the production
area and approximately 37 handlers
subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $6,000,000.
According to the NASS Vegetables
2004 Summary, the total F.O.B. value of
onions in the regulated production area
for 2004 was $110,355,000. Therefore,
based on an industry of 233 producers
and 37 handlers, it can be concluded
that the majority of handlers and
producers of Idaho-Eastern Oregon
onions may be classified as small
entities.
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2005–
2006 and subsequent fiscal periods from
$0.105 to $0.10 per hundredweight of
onions. The Committee unanimously
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:14 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
recommended 2005–2006 expenditures
of $956,001 and an assessment rate of
$0.10 per hundredweight. The
assessment rate of $0.10 is $0.005 lower
than the rate in effect during the 2004–
2005 fiscal period. The quantity of
assessable onions for the 2005–2006
year is estimated at 8,464,000
hundredweight which should provide
$846,400 in assessment income. Income
derived from handler assessments, along
with contributions ($73,600), interest
income ($7,400), other income ($2,000),
and funds from the Committee’s
authorized reserve ($26,601), should be
adequate to cover budgeted expenses.
The decreased assessment rate
recommended by the Committee reflects
the reduction in anticipated
expenditures from $997,442 to
$956,001.
Both producers and handlers in the
regulated production area expressed a
need to decrease the assessment rate to
help offset the lower prices received by
handlers. The NASS reported in the
Vegetables 2004 Summary, which was
published in January 2005, that the 2004
average F.O.B. price for the IdahoEastern Oregon onions was $8.14 per
hundredweight. That price is $1.42
below the three-year average F.O.B.
price of $9.56 per hundredweight for
this production area. The Committee
considered lower assessment rates;
however, it determined that lower rates
would not generate the income
necessary to sustain the current level of
programs desired by the industry.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2005–2006 year include $10,000 for
committee expenses, $104,371 for salary
expenses, $81,160 for travel/office
expenses, $62,470 for production
research expenses, $32,000 for export
market development expenses, $616,000
for promotion expenses, and $50,000 for
unforeseen marketing order
contingencies. Budgeted expenses for
these items in 2004–2005 were $10,000,
$163,482, $81,960, $60,000, $32,000,
$600,000, and $50,000, respectively.
The Committee reviewed and
unanimously recommended 2005–2006
expenditures of $956,001 which
includes decreases in salary expenses
and travel/office expenses, as well as
increases in production research
expenses and promotion expenses. Prior
to arriving at this budget, the Committee
considered information from various
sources, such as the Committee’s
Executive, Promotion, Research, and
Export subcommittees. These
subcommittees discussed alternative
expenditure levels, based upon the
relative value of various research and
promotion projects to the onion
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
industry. The assessment rate of $0.10
per hundredweight of assessable onions
was then determined by taking into
consideration the estimated level of
assessable shipments, the market
situation, program expenditure needs,
and the desire to sustain a monetary
reserve at a viable level.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming year indicates that the
producer price for the 2005–2006 season
could range between $5.50 and $8.00
per hundredweight of onions. Therefore,
the estimated assessment revenue for
the 2005–2006 year as a percentage of
total producer revenue could range
between 1.82 and 1.25 percent.
This action continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers, and may reduce
the burden on producers. In addition,
the Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Idaho-Eastern
Oregon onion industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the April
14, 2005, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large Idaho-Eastern
Oregon onion handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
An interim final rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on June 3, 2005 (70 FR 32481).
Copies of that rule were made available
by the Committee’s staff to all
producers, handlers, and interested
persons. In addition, the rule was made
available through the internet by USDA
and the Office of the Federal Register. A
60-day comment period was provided
for interested persons to respond to the
interim final rule. The comment period
ended on August 2, 2005. One response
was received, but it was not relevant to
the assessment rate decrease.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 958
Onions, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 958—ONIONS GROWN IN
CERTAIN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN
IDAHO, AND MALHEUR COUNTY,
OREGON
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR part 958 which was
published at 70 FR 32481 on June 3,
2005, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
I
Dated: August 25, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–17269 Filed 8–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Chapter I
Energy Policy Act of 2005
Requirements; Treatment of
Accelerator-Produced and Other
Radioactive Material as Byproduct
Material; Waiver
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Time-limited waiver of Energy
Policy Act of 2005 requirements.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing a timelimited waiver of the requirements
enacted by section 651(e) of the Energy
Policy Act of 2005, titled ‘‘Treatment of
Accelerator-Produced and Other
Radioactive Material as Byproduct
Material’’, as they pertain to byproduct
material as defined in paragraphs (3)
and (4) of section 11 e. of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as added by section
651(e). The waiver will allow persons
owning, using, and otherwise engaging
in activities involving the material to
continue with their activities and States
to continue to regulate this material
during the applicable waiver period.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:14 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
This waiver is effective August
31, 2005. This waiver is effective
through August 7, 2006, for the import
and export of materials covered by the
waiver, unless terminated sooner if the
Commission determines that an earlier
termination is warranted. For all other
matters, it is effective through August 7,
2009, unless terminated sooner if the
Commission determines that an earlier
termination is warranted or required.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Chidakel, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, telephone (301) 415–1535, e-mail
ssc@nrc.gov or Merri Horn, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone
(301) 415–8126, e-mail, mlh1@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
President of the United States signed the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 on August 8,
2005. The provisions of the Act became
effective immediately, unless another
effective date was expressly provided.
Since no effective date was stated for
the provisions of section 651(e) of the
Act, section 651(e) became effective
immediately, and brought byproduct
material, as defined in paragraphs (3)
and (4) of section 11 e. of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2201 et
seq.), as added by section 651(e)(1),
under the immediate regulatory
authority of the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
Section 11 e.(3) of the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954 now includes as byproduct
material: (i) any discrete source of
radium-226 that is produced, extracted,
or converted after extraction (before, on,
or after the date of enactment of section
651(e) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005),
for use for a commercial, medical, or
research activity; and (ii) any material
that has been made radioactive by use
of a particle accelerator and is
produced, extracted, or converted after
extraction (before, on, or after the date
of enactment of section 651(e) of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005), for use for
a commercial, medical, or research
activity. Section 11 e.(4) expands the
definition to include any discrete source
of naturally occurring radioactive
material, other than source material, if
certain conditions are met. Section 11
e.(4) is considered to be a place-holder
and NRC staff does not anticipate a need
for active regulation of the latter
material at this time.
Prior to enactment of the Energy
Policy Act of 2005, the NRC did not
have authority over the newly covered
byproduct material, and it fell under the
authority of the States. Therefore, the
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51581
NRC does not currently have regulations
in place that would specifically apply to
the material. With the enactment of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005, the States
may no longer assert the authority to
regulate the newly covered byproduct
material, except as authorized to do so
by the Act.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 allows
the Commission up to 18 months after
the date of enactment to issue final
regulations for the newly covered
byproduct material. To facilitate an
orderly transition of regulatory authority
with respect to the newly defined
byproduct material, the Act also
provides for preparation and
publication of a transition plan for
States that have not previously entered
into an Agreement with the Commission
under section 274 b of the Atomic
Energy Act and for those States that
have entered into such an Agreement.
However, neither the regulations nor the
transition plan have yet been developed.
Until such time as the regulations and
transition plan have been completed
and are in place, persons that engage in
activities involving the material will
want to continue with their activities.
To ease the transition period from
individualized State programs to a more
uniform regulatory program developed
under the Atomic Energy Act and its
section 274b Agreement State Program,
section 651(e) of the Energy Policy Act
of 2005 authorizes the Commission to
issue waivers of its authority. Waivers of
the Commission’s jurisdiction will
permit existing State authorities to
continue. Ultimate transition from NRC
to State authority for those States with
an existing Agreement State program is
expected to proceed easily. For States
without such programs currently, that
want to enter into an agreement with the
NRC, this waiver period will permit
them to go through the processes
necessary to establish and carry out an
Agreement State program to regulate
this material after the waiver period
expires.
Section 651(e)(5) authorizes the
Commission to grant a waiver to any
entity of any requirement under section
651(e) with respect to a matter relating
to the newly defined byproduct
material, except as required by section
651(e)(5)(B)(i)(l). Thus, such a waiver
can also be granted to entities that
engage in activities involving the
material. Without the waiver, States that
seek to continue regulation of the
material would be, and persons that
carry on activities involving the newly
defined byproduct material could be, in
technical violation of the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954, as amended by section
651(e) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 31, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51578-51581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17269]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 958
[Docket No. FV05-958-1 FIR]
Onions Grown in Certain Designated Counties in Idaho, and Malheur
County, OR; Decreased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, without change, an interim final rule which decreased the
assessment rate established for the Idaho-Eastern Oregon Onion
Committee (Committee) for the 2005-2006 and subsequent fiscal periods
from $0.105 to
[[Page 51579]]
$0.10 per hundredweight of onions handled. The Committee locally
administers the marketing order which regulates the handling of onions
grown in designated counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon.
Authorization to assess onion handlers enables the Committee to incur
expenses that are reasonable and necessary to administer the program.
The fiscal period began July 1 and ends June 30. The assessment rate
will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or
terminated.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 30, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan M. Hiller, Northwest Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax: (503)
326-7440; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 130 and Marketing Order No. 958, both as amended (7 CFR
part 958), regulating the handling of onions grown in designated
counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon, hereinafter referred to
as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674),
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
USDA is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, Idaho-Eastern
Oregon onion handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer
the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable
onions beginning July 1, 2005, and continue until amended, suspended,
or terminated. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment rate established for the Committee for the 2005-2006 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $0.105 per hundredweight to $0.10 per
hundredweight of onions handled.
The Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion marketing order provides authority
for the Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual
budget of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer
the program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of
Idaho-Eastern Oregon onions. They are familiar with the Committee's
needs and with the costs for goods and services in their local area and
are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and
assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a
public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity
to participate and provide input.
For the 2004-2005 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate that would continue
in effect from fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other information available to USDA.
The Committee met on April 14, 2005, and unanimously recommended
2005-2006 expenditures of $956,001 and an assessment rate of $0.10 per
hundredweight of onions. In comparison, last year's budgeted
expenditures were $997,442. The assessment rate of $0.10 is $0.005
lower than the previous rate. The decreased assessment rate recommended
by the Committee reflects the reduction in anticipated expenditures.
Both producers and handlers in the regulated production area
expressed a need to decrease the assessment rate to help offset the
lower prices received by handlers. The National Agricultural Statistics
Service (NASS) reported in the Vegetables 2004 Summary, published in
January 2005, that the 2004 average F.O.B. price for the Idaho-Eastern
Oregon onions was $8.14 per hundredweight. That price is $1.42 below
the three year average F.O.B. price of $9.56 per hundredweight for this
production area. The Committee considered assessment rates lower than
$0.10 per hundredweight; however, it determined that the lower rates
would not generate the income necessary to sustain the current level of
programs desired by the industry.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2005-
2006 year include $10,000 for committee expenses, $104,371 for salary
expenses, $81,160 for travel/office expenses, $62,470 for production
research expenses, $32,000 for export market development expenses,
$616,000 for promotion expenses, and $50,000 for unforeseen marketing
order contingencies. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2004-2005
were $10,000 $13,482, $81,960, $60,000, $32,000, $600,000, and $50,000,
respectively.
The Committee based its recommended assessment rate decrease on the
2005-2006 crop estimate, the 2005-2006 program expenditure needs, and
the current and projected size of its monetary reserve. The Committee
estimated onion shipments for 2005-2006 at 8,464,000 hundredweight
which should provide $846,400 in assessment income. Income derived from
handler assessments, along with contributions ($73,600), interest
income ($7,400), other income ($2,000), and funds from the Committee's
authorized reserve ($26,601), should be adequate to cover budgeted
expenses. The Committee estimates that its operating reserve will be
approximately $596,074 at the end of the 2005-2006 fiscal period. Funds
in the reserve will be kept within the maximum permitted by the order
of approximately one fiscal year's operational expenses (Sec. 958.44).
The assessment rate will continue in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the Committee or other available information.
Although this assessment rate is effective for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior
[[Page 51580]]
to or during each fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee
or USDA. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested
persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate
Committee recommendations and other available information to determine
whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further
rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2005-2006
budget and those for subsequent fiscal periods will be reviewed and, as
appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 233 producers of onions in the production
area and approximately 37 handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms
are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $6,000,000.
According to the NASS Vegetables 2004 Summary, the total F.O.B.
value of onions in the regulated production area for 2004 was
$110,355,000. Therefore, based on an industry of 233 producers and 37
handlers, it can be concluded that the majority of handlers and
producers of Idaho-Eastern Oregon onions may be classified as small
entities.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment rate established for the Committee and collected from
handlers for the 2005-2006 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.105 to
$0.10 per hundredweight of onions. The Committee unanimously
recommended 2005-2006 expenditures of $956,001 and an assessment rate
of $0.10 per hundredweight. The assessment rate of $0.10 is $0.005
lower than the rate in effect during the 2004-2005 fiscal period. The
quantity of assessable onions for the 2005-2006 year is estimated at
8,464,000 hundredweight which should provide $846,400 in assessment
income. Income derived from handler assessments, along with
contributions ($73,600), interest income ($7,400), other income
($2,000), and funds from the Committee's authorized reserve ($26,601),
should be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. The decreased assessment
rate recommended by the Committee reflects the reduction in anticipated
expenditures from $997,442 to $956,001.
Both producers and handlers in the regulated production area
expressed a need to decrease the assessment rate to help offset the
lower prices received by handlers. The NASS reported in the Vegetables
2004 Summary, which was published in January 2005, that the 2004
average F.O.B. price for the Idaho-Eastern Oregon onions was $8.14 per
hundredweight. That price is $1.42 below the three-year average F.O.B.
price of $9.56 per hundredweight for this production area. The
Committee considered lower assessment rates; however, it determined
that lower rates would not generate the income necessary to sustain the
current level of programs desired by the industry.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2005-
2006 year include $10,000 for committee expenses, $104,371 for salary
expenses, $81,160 for travel/office expenses, $62,470 for production
research expenses, $32,000 for export market development expenses,
$616,000 for promotion expenses, and $50,000 for unforeseen marketing
order contingencies. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2004-2005
were $10,000, $163,482, $81,960, $60,000, $32,000, $600,000, and
$50,000, respectively.
The Committee reviewed and unanimously recommended 2005-2006
expenditures of $956,001 which includes decreases in salary expenses
and travel/office expenses, as well as increases in production research
expenses and promotion expenses. Prior to arriving at this budget, the
Committee considered information from various sources, such as the
Committee's Executive, Promotion, Research, and Export subcommittees.
These subcommittees discussed alternative expenditure levels, based
upon the relative value of various research and promotion projects to
the onion industry. The assessment rate of $0.10 per hundredweight of
assessable onions was then determined by taking into consideration the
estimated level of assessable shipments, the market situation, program
expenditure needs, and the desire to sustain a monetary reserve at a
viable level.
A review of historical information and preliminary information
pertaining to the upcoming year indicates that the producer price for
the 2005-2006 season could range between $5.50 and $8.00 per
hundredweight of onions. Therefore, the estimated assessment revenue
for the 2005-2006 year as a percentage of total producer revenue could
range between 1.82 and 1.25 percent.
This action continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment obligation imposed on handlers. Assessments are applied
uniformly on all handlers, and some of the costs may be passed on to
producers. However, decreasing the assessment rate reduces the burden
on handlers, and may reduce the burden on producers. In addition, the
Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the Idaho-Eastern
Oregon onion industry and all interested persons were invited to attend
the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the April 14, 2005, meeting was a public
meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express
views on this issue.
This action imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
An interim final rule concerning this action was published in the
Federal Register on June 3, 2005 (70 FR 32481). Copies of that rule
were made available by the Committee's staff to all producers,
handlers, and interested persons. In addition, the rule was made
available through the internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 60-day comment period was provided for interested persons
to respond to the interim final rule. The comment period ended on
August 2, 2005. One response was received, but it was not relevant to
the assessment rate decrease.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
[[Page 51581]]
compliance guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 958
Onions, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 958--ONIONS GROWN IN CERTAIN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN IDAHO, AND
MALHEUR COUNTY, OREGON
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 958 which was
published at 70 FR 32481 on June 3, 2005, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
Dated: August 25, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-17269 Filed 8-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P