Methoxyfenozide; Pesticide Tolerances for Emergency Exemptions, 51597-51604 [05-17131]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number OPP–2005–
0224. All documents in the docket are
listed in the EDOCKET index at https://
www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed
in the index, some information is not
publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
copy at the Public Information and
Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm.
119, Crystal Mall#2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA. This docket facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
INFORMATION.
PART 51—REQUIREMENTS FOR
PREPARATION, ADOPTION AND
SUBMITTAL OF IMPLEMENTATION
PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 51
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 101; 42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671q.
Subpart G—Control Strategy
2. Section 51.121 is amended by
adding paragraph (s) to read as follows:
I
§ 51.121 Findings and requirements for
submission of State implementation plan
revisions relating to emissions of oxides of
nitrogen.
*
*
*
*
*
(s) Stay of Finding of Significant
Contribution with respect to the 1-hour
standard. Notwithstanding any other
provisions of this subpart, the
effectiveness of paragraph (a)(1) of this
section is stayed as it relates to the State
of Georgia, only as of September 30,
2005.
[FR Doc. 05–17031 Filed 8–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stacey Milan Groce, Registration
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 305–2505; e-mail address:
milan.stacey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
40 CFR Part 180
I. General Information
[OPP–2005–0224; FRL–7732–3]
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
Methoxyfenozide; Pesticide Tolerances
for Emergency Exemptions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes
time-limited tolerances for residues of
methoxyfenozide in or on sorghum
grain, sorghum grain forage, and
sorghum grain stover. This action is in
response to EPA’s granting of an
emergency exemption under section 18
of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
authorizing use of the pesticide on
sorghum grain. This regulation
establishes a maximum permissible
level for residues of methoxyfenozide in
these food commodities. These
tolerances will expire and are revoked
on December 31, 2007.
DATES: This regulation is effective
August 31, 2005. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before October 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: To submit a written
objection or hearing request follow the
detailed instructions as provided in
Unit VII. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:14 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111)
• Animal production (NAICS code
112)
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311)
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532)
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51597
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document and Other Related
Information?
In addition to using EDOCKET (https://
www.epa.gov/edocket/), you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A
frequently updated electronic version of
40 CFR part 180 is available on E-CFR
Beta Site Two at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
EPA, on its own initiative, in
accordance with sections 408(e) and 408
(l)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a,
is establishing tolerances for residues of
the insecticide methoxyfenozide,
benzoic acid, 3-methoxy-2-methyl-2(3,5-dimethylbenzoyl)-2-(1,1dimethylethyl)hydrazide, in or on
sorghum grain at 0.05 parts per million
(ppm), sorghum grain forage at 15 ppm,
and sorghum grain stover at 125 ppm.
These tolerances will expire and are
revoked on December 31, 2007. EPA
will publish a document in the Federal
Register to remove the revoked
tolerances from the Code of Federal
Regulations.
Section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA
requires EPA to establish time-limited
tolerances or exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance for pesticide
chemical residues in food that will
result from the use of a pesticide under
an emergency exemption granted by
EPA under section 18 of FIFRA. Such
tolerances can be established without
providing notice or period for public
comment. EPA does not intend for its
actions on section 18 related tolerances
to set binding precedents for the
application of section 408 of the FFDCA
and the new safety standard to other
tolerances and exemptions. Section
408(e) of the FFDCA allows EPA to
establish a tolerance or an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance on
its own initiative, i.e., without having
received any petition from an outside
party.
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
51598
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA requires EPA
to give special consideration to
exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in
establishing a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue. . . .’’
Section 18 of the FIFRA authorizes
EPA to exempt any Federal or State
agency from any provision of FIFRA, if
EPA determines that ‘‘emergency
conditions exist which require such
exemption.’’ This provision was not
amended by the Food Quality Protection
Act of 1996 (FQPA). EPA has
established regulations governing such
emergency exemptions in 40 CFR part
166.
III. Emergency Exemption for
Methoxyfenozide on Sorghum Grain,
Sorghum Grain Forage, Sorghum Grain
Stover and FFDCA Tolerances
The southwestern corn borer is a
major pest on corn, but has become
problematic for Louisiana sorghum
producers in recent years. The
southwestern corn borer is known to
infest grain sorghum and had not been
documented as an important pest of this
crop until 2002, when heavy moth
infestations developed in corn and
migrated to late planted sorghum fields.
Grain sorghum is usually planted in the
spring, but adverse weather conditions
and planting conflicts ensure that a
significant amount of acreage will be
planted late. These conditions can
provide a susceptible host for heavy
southwestern corn borer moth flight
during late summer. This unexpected
heavy migration into grain sorghum has
left many growers without adequate
technology to control this pest.
The sugarcane borer is a major pest of
corn grown in the vicinity of sugarcane.
The sugarcane borer recently became an
important pest of corn in parts of
Louisiana where no sugarcane is
produced. This northern shift in the
infestation range of the sugarcane borer
is likely the result of mild winters and
an increase in reduced tillage crop
production, which has allowed this pest
to become established outside of its
normal range. Heavy populations of
sugarcane borer moth infestations have
migrated to late planted sorghum fields
and growers have been ill-prepared in
handling this disease.
The Louisiana State AgCenter
recommends the following two
insecticides: Cypermethrin and lambdacyhalothrin for control of the
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:14 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
southwestern corn borer when they are
applied before the larvae bore into the
stalk. However, the short-lived residual
effectiveness of both pyrethroids
requires an effective scouting program
to carefully time applications. This
practice is not available in Louisiana
and there are currently no insecticides
registered for control of the sugarcane
borer on grain sorghum.
Methoxyfenozide is a suitable
alternative because of its moderate
residual life and low risk to humans and
most non-target organisms.
Planting grain sorghum early is an
important management practice against
both the southwestern corn borer and
the sugarcane borer. Early planted
sorghum usually matures before
southwestern corn borer and sugarcane
borer populations reach their peak
migration from their host plants.
However, this practice is limited by
weather conditions, which often delay
planting sorghum acreage until late
spring and early summer. Shredding the
crop stubble followed by tillage is no
longer feasible since most sorghum is
now grown under reduced tillage
conditions. Natural enemies destroy
large numbers of the southwestern corn
borer, but not at levels necessary to
prevent significant loss. EPA has
authorized under FIFRA section 18 the
use of methoxyfenozide on grain
sorghum to control southwestern corn
borer and sugarcane borer for use on
grain sorghum in Louisiana. After
having reviewed the submission, EPA
concurs that emergency conditions exist
for this State.
As part of its assessment of this
emergency exemption, EPA assessed the
potential risks presented by residues of
methoxyfenozide in or on sorghum
grain, sorghum grain forage, and
sorghum grain stover. In doing so, EPA
considered the safety standard in
section 408(b)(2) of the FFDCA, and
EPA decided that the necessary
tolerances under section 408(l)(6) of the
FFDCA would be consistent with the
safety standard and with FIFRA section
18. Consistent with the need to move
quickly on the emergency exemption in
order to address an urgent non-routine
situation and to ensure that the resulting
food is safe and lawful, EPA is issuing
these tolerances without notice and
opportunity for public comment as
provided in section 408(l)(6) of the
FFDCA. Although these tolerances will
expire and are revoked on December 31,
2007, under section 408(l)(5) of the
FFDCA, residues of the pesticide not in
excess of the amounts specified in the
tolerance remaining in or on sorghum
grain, sorghum grain forage, sorghum
grain stover after that date will not be
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
unlawful, provided the pesticide is
applied in a manner that was lawful
under FIFRA, and the residues do not
exceed a level that was authorized by
these tolerances at the time of that
application. EPA will take action to
revoke these tolerances earlier if any
experience with, scientific data on, or
other relevant information on this
pesticide indicate that the residues are
not safe.
Because these tolerances are being
approved under emergency conditions,
EPA has not made any decisions about
whether methoxyfenozide meets EPA’s
registration requirements for use on
sorghum grain, sorghum grain forage,
sorghum grain stover or whether
permanent tolerances for this use would
be appropriate. Under these
circumstances, EPA does not believe
that these tolerances serves as a basis for
registration of methoxyfenozide by a
State for special local needs under
FIFRA section 24(c). Nor do these
tolerances serve as the basis for any
State other than Louisiana to use this
pesticide on this crop under section 18
of FIFRA without following all
provisions of EPA’s regulations
implementing FIFRA section 18 as
identified in 40 CFR part 166. For
additional information regarding the
emergency exemption for
methoxyfenozide, contact the Agency’s
Registration Division at the address
provided under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
EPA performs a number of analyses to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide residues. For
further discussion of the regulatory
requirements of section 408 of the
FFDCA and a complete description of
the risk assessment process, see the final
rule on Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances
of November 26, 1997 (62 FR 62961)
(FRL–5754–7).
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D)
of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess
the hazards of methoxyfenozide and to
make a determination on aggregate
exposure, consistent with section
408(b)(2) of the FFDCA, for time-limited
tolerances for residues of
methoxyfenozide in or on sorghum
grain at 0.05 ppm, sorghum grain forage
at 15 ppm, and sorghum grain stover at
125 ppm. EPA’s assessment of the
dietary exposures and risks associated
with establishing these tolerances
follows.
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
A. Toxicological Endpoints
The dose at which no adverse effects
are observed (the NOAEL) from the
toxicology study identified as
appropriate for use in risk assessment is
used to estimate the toxicological
endpoint. However, the lowest dose at
which adverse effects of concern are
identified (the LOAEL) is sometimes
used for risk assessment if no NOAEL
was achieved in the toxicology study
selected. An uncertainty factor (UF) is
applied to reflect uncertainties inherent
in the extrapolation from laboratory
animal data to humans and in the
variations in sensitivity among members
of the human population as well as
other unknowns. An UF of 100 is
routinely used, 10X to account for
interspecies differences and 10X for
intra species differences.
For dietary risk assessments (other
than cancer) the Agency uses the UF to
calculate an acute or chronic reference
dose (aRfD or cRfD) where + the RfD is
equal to the NOAEL divided by the
appropriate UF (RfD = NOAEL/UF).
Where an additional safety factor is
retained due to concerns unique to the
FQPA, this additional factor is applied
to the RfD by dividing the RfD by such
additional factor. The acute or chronic
Population Adjusted Dose (aPAD or
cPAD) is a modification of the RfD to
accommodate this type of FQPA SF.
For non-dietary risk assessments
(other than cancer) the UF is used to
determine the level of concern (LOC).
For example, when 100 is the
appropriate UF (10X to account for
interspecies differences and 10X for
intraspecies differences) the LOC is 100.
To estimate risk, a ratio of the NOAEL
to exposures (margin of exposure (MOE)
= NOAEL/exposure) is calculated and
compared to the LOC.
The linear default risk methodology
(Q*) is the primary method currently
used by the Agency to quantify
carcinogenic risk. The Q* approach
51599
assumes that any amount of exposure
will lead to some degree of cancer risk.
A Q* is calculated and used to estimate
risk which represents a probability of
occurrence of additional cancer cases
(e.g., risk is expressed as 1 x 10-6 or one
in a million). Under certain specific
circumstances, MOE calculations will
be used for the carcinogenic risk
assessment. In this non-linear approach,
a ‘‘point of departure’’ is identified
below which carcinogenic effects are
not expected. The point of departure is
typically a NOAEL based on an
endpoint related to cancer effects
though it may be a different value
derived from the dose response curve.
To estimate risk, a ratio of the point of
departure to exposure (MOEcancer = point
of departure/exposures) is calculated. A
summary of the toxicological endpoints
for methoxyfenozide used for human
risk assessment is shown in the
following Table 1:
TABLE 1.—SUMMARY OF TOXICOLOGICAL DOSE AND ENDPOINTS FOR METHOXYFENOZIDE FOR USE IN HUMAN RISK
ASSESSMENT
Dose Used in Risk Assessment, UF
Exposure Scenario
FQPA SF* and Level of
Concern for Risk Assessment
Study and Toxicological Effects
Acute dietary (females 13-50
years of age and the general
population including infants
and children)
None
None
No appropriate endpoint was identified in the
oral toxicity studies, including the acute
neurotoxicity study in rats and the developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits
Chronic dietary all populations
NOAEL = 10.2 mg/kg/day
UF = 100
Chronic RfD = 0.10 mg/kg/
day
FQPA SF = 1
cPAD = chronic RfD
FQPA SF = 0.10 mg/kg/day
2–Year combined chronic feeding/carcinogenicity, rats
LOAEL = 411 mg/kg/day based on
hematological changes (decreased RBC, hemoglobin and hematocrit), liver toxicity (increased
weights,
hypertrophy),
histopathological changes in thyroid (increased follicular cell hyppertrophy, altered
colloid), possible adrenal toxicity (increased
weights)
Short-term, intermediate-term,
long-term dermal and Inhalation
None
None
No systemic toxicity was observed at the limit
dose following repeated dermal application to
rats
Based on low vapor pressure, the low acute
toxicity of both the technical and formulated
products as well as the application rate and
application method, there is minimal concern
for inhalation exposure.
Cancer (oral, dermal, inhalation)
Methoxyfenozide has been
classified as a ‘‘not likely’’ human carcinogen
The classification is based on the lack of evidence of carcinogenicity in male and female
rats as well as in male and female mice and
on the lack of genotoxocity in an acceptable
battery of mutagenicity studies
*The reference to the FQPA SF refers to any additional SF retained due to concerns unique to the FQPA.
B. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and
feed uses. Tolerances have been
established (40 CFR 180.544) for the
residues of methoxyfenozide, in or on a
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:14 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
variety of raw agricultural commodities
including the pome fruits crop group,
apple pomace, cotton seed, cotton gin
byproducts, sweet corn, field corn, milk,
meat, fat, liver, and meat byproducts of
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
cattle, goats, hogs, horses, and sheep.
Risk assessments were conducted by
EPA to assess dietary exposures from
methoxyfenozide in food as follows:
i. Acute exposure. Acute dietary risk
assessments are performed for a food-
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
51600
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
use pesticide if a toxicological study has
indicated the possibility of an effect of
concern occurring as a result of a 1–day
or single exposure. No appropriate
endpoint was identified in the oral
toxicity studies including the acute
neurotoxicity study in rats and the
developmental toxicity studies in rats
and rabbits. Therefore, acute dietary risk
assessments were not conducted.
ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting
this chronic dietary risk assessment the
Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model
(DEEMTM) analysis evaluated the
individual food consumption as
reported by respondents in the United
States Department of agriculture (USDA)
1989–1992 nationwide Continuing
Surveys of Food Intake by Individuals
(CSFII) and accumulated exposure to
the chemical for each commodity. The
following assumptions were made for
the chronic exposure assessments:
100% of all crops were treated and all
resulting residues were at tolerance
level.
iii. Cancer. Methoxyfenozide has been
classified as a ‘‘not likely human
carcinogen.’’ The classification is based
on the lack of evidence of
carcinogenicity in male and female rats
as well as in male and female mice and
on the lack of genotoxicity in an
acceptable battery of mutagenicity
studies. Therefore, risk assessments to
estimate cancer were not conducted.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking
water. The Agency lacks sufficient
monitoring exposure data to complete a
comprehensive dietary exposure
analysis and risk assessment for
methoxyfenozide in drinking water.
Because the Agency does not have
comprehensive monitoring data,
drinking water concentration estimates
are made by reliance on simulation or
modeling taking into account data on
the physical characteristics of
methoxyfenozide.
The Agency uses the Generic
Estimated Environmental Concentration
(GENEEC) or the Pesticide Root Zone/
Exposure Analysis Modeling System
(PRZM/EXAMS) to estimate pesticide
concentrations in surface water and SCIGROW, which predicts pesticide
concentrations in ground water. In
general, EPA will use GENEEC (a Tier
1 model) before using PRZM/EXAMS (a
Tier 2 model) for a screening-level
assessment for surface water. The
GENEEC model is a subset of the PRZM/
EXAMS model that uses a specific highend runoff scenario for pesticides.
GENEEC incorporates a farm pond
scenario, while PRZM/EXAMS
incorporate an index reservoir
environment in place of the previous
pond scenario. The PRZM/EXAMS
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:14 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
model includes a percent crop (PC) area
factor as an adjustment to account for
the maximum percent crop coverage
within a watershed or drainage basin.
The Agency uses the First Index
Reservoir Screening Tool (FIRST) or the
PRZM/EXAMS to produce estimates of
pesticide concentrations in an index
reservoir. The SCI-GROW model is used
to predict pesticide concentrations in
shallow ground water. For a screeninglevel assessment for surface water EPA
will generally use FIRST (a Tier 1
model) before using PRZM/EXAMS (a
Tier 2 model). The FIRST model is a
subset of the PRZM/EXAMS model that
uses a specific high-end runoff scenario
for pesticides. While both FIRST and
PRZM/EXAMS incorporate an index
reservoir environment, the PRZM/
EXAMS model includes a PC area factor
as an adjustment to account for the
maximum percent crop coverage within
a watershed or drainage basin.
None of these models include
consideration of the impact processing
(mixing, dilution, or treatment) of raw
water for distribution as drinking water
would likely have on the removal of
pesticides from the source water. The
primary use of these models by the
Agency at this stage is to provide a
coarse screen for sorting out pesticides
for which it is highly unlikely that
drinking water concentrations would
ever exceed human health levels of
concern.
Since the models used are considered
to be screening tools in the risk
assessment process, the Agency does
not use estimated environmental
concentrations (EECs) from these
models to quantify drinking water
exposure and risk as a %RfD or %PAD.
Instead drinking water levels of
comparison (DWLOCs) are calculated
and used as a point of comparison
against the model estimates of a
pesticide’s concentration in water.
DWLOCs are theoretical upper limits on
a pesticide’s concentration in drinking
water in light of total aggregate exposure
to a pesticide in food, and from
residential uses. Since DWLOCs address
total aggregate exposure to
methoxyfenozide, they are further
discussed in the aggregate risk sections
below.
Based on the PRZM/EXAMS and SCIGROW models the estimated
environmental concentrations (EECs) of
methoxyfenozide for chronic exposures
are estimated to be 30 parts per billion
(ppb) for surface water and 3.5 ppb for
ground water.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The
term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in
this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(e.g., for lawn and garden pest control,
indoor pest control, termiticides, and
flea and tick control on pets).
Methoxyfenozide is not registered for
use on any sites that would result in
residential exposure.
4. Cumulative effects from substances
with a common mechanism of toxicity.
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
Unlike other pesticides for which EPA
has followed a cumulative risk approach
based on a common mechanism of
toxicity, EPA has not made a common
mechanism of toxicity finding as to
methoxyfenozide and any other
substances and methoxyfenozide does
not appear to produce a toxic metabolite
produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this tolerance action,
therefore, EPA has not assumed that
methoxyfenozide has a common
mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. For information regarding
EPA’s efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism
of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals,
see the policy statements released by
EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs
concerning common mechanism
determinations and procedures for
cumulating effects from substances
found to have a common mechanism on
EPA’s website at https://www.epa.gov/
pesticides/cumulative/.
C. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
1. In general. Section 408 of the
FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply
an additional tenfold margin of safety
(MOS) for infants and children in the
case of threshold effects to account for
prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the data base on
toxicity and exposure unless EPA
determines that a different MOS will be
safe for infants and children. MOS are
incorporated into EPA risk assessments
either directly through use of a MOE
analysis or through using uncertainty
(safety) factors in calculating a dose
level that poses no appreciable risk to
humans.
2. Developmental toxicity studies. In a
developmental toxicity study in rats
regarding maternal findings, there were
no deaths orclinical signs, nor were
there any effects on body weights or
food consumption. No changes were
noted in any of the reproductive
parameters. Fetal examinations did not
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
reveal any effects on body weight or
gross/visceral/skeletal aspects. The
maternal NOAEL is 1,000 milligram/
kilogram/day (mg/kg/day) Highest dose
tested (HDT) and the maternal LOAEL is
greater than 1,000 mg/kg/day. The
developmental NOAEL is 1,000 mg/kg/
day and the developmental LOAEL is
greater than 1,000 mg/kg/day.
In a developmental toxicity study in
rabbits regarding maternal findings,
there were no deaths or clinical signs,
nor were there any effects on body
weights, weight gains, or food
consumption. No changes were noted in
any of the reproductive parameters.
Fetal examinations did not reveal any
effects on body weight or gross/visceral/
skeletal aspects. The maternal NOAEL is
1,000 mg/kg/day HDT, and the maternal
LOAEL is greater than 1,000 mg/kg/day.
The developmental NOAEL is 1,000 mg/
kg day and the developmental LOAEL is
greater than 1,000 mg/kg day.
3. Reproductive toxicity study. In a 2generation reproduction study, the
LOAEL for systemic toxicity is 20,000
ppm (1,551.9 mg/kg day), based on
increased absolute and relative liver
weights in males and females and on the
hepatocellular hypertrophy in males
and females. The NOAEL for systemic
toxicity is 2,000 ppm (153.4 mg/kg/day).
There were no treatment related
reproductive effects on the P1 and P2
males and females or their F1 and F2
offspring. Therefore, the NOAEL for
reproductive toxicity is greater than
20,000 ppm (1,551.9–2,036.5 mg/kg day)
HDT. The LOAEL for reproductive
toxicity was not identified.
4. Neurotoxicity. In an acute oral
neurotoxicity study in rats, there were
no observable signs of a neurotoxic
effect at the highest concentration in
females. Functional observational
battery (FOB) assessment on day 0
revealed a decrease in hindlimb grip
strength for males in the 2,000 mg/kg
group. Motor activity assessment
remained comparable to controls
throughout the study for males and
females in all exposure groups. No
neuropathological endpoints were
observed during the histological
examinations of the peripheral or
central nervous systems of these
animals at any exposure concentration.
Based on the absence of any substance
related effects on body weight or body
weight gain and any clinical signs of
toxicity, the NOAEL for systemic
toxicity is a concentration of 2,000 mg/
kg for males and females. The NOAEL
for neurotoxic effects is 200 mg/kg for
females. Based on a decrease in
hindlimb grip strength on day 0 in the
2,000 mg/kg male group, the NOAEL for
males is 1,000 mg/kg and the LOAEL for
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:14 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
males is 2,000 mg/kg. No LOAEL was
established for systemic effects in males
or females or for neurotoxic effects in
females.
In a subchronic oral neurotoxicity
study in rats, there were no observable
signs of a neurotoxic effect at the
highest concentration in males or
females. FOB and MA remained
comparable to controls throughout the
study and no neuropathological
endpoints were observed during the
histological exams of these animals at
any exposure concentration. Based on
the absence of any substance related
effects on body weight or body weight
gain and any clinical signs of toxicity,
the NOAEL for systemic toxicity is also
2,000 ppm for males (1,318 mg/kg/day),
and females (1,577 mg/kg/day). No
LOAEL was established for systemic or
neurotoxic effects.
In none of the other oral toxicity
studies on methoxyfenozide were there
any signs of neurotoxicity. The studies
considered included all the available
toxicology studies on methoxyfenozide.
5. Conclusion. There is a complete
toxicity data base for methoxyfenozide
and no additional studies are required at
this time. The scientific and regulatory
quality of the toxicology data base for
methoxyfenozide is high and is
considered sufficient to clearly define
the toxicity of this chemical. There is,
therefore, high confidence in the hazard
and dose-response assessments
conducted for this chemical. Exposure
data are complete or are estimated based
on data that reasonably accounts for
potential exposures.
The toxicology data provided no
indication of increased susceptibility in
rats or rabbits from in utero and/or post
natal exposure to methoxyfenozide. In
the prenatal developmental toxicity
studies in rats and rabbits, no
developmental toxicity was observed at
the limit dose, which is the HDT. In the
2-generation reproduction study in rats,
no effects in the offspring were observed
at the HDT. In none of the oral toxicity
studies on methoxyfenozide were there
any signs of neurotoxicity. The studies
considered included all the available
toxicology studies on methoxyfenozide.
Therefore, the Agency has determined
that the FQPA Safety Factor (as required
by the FQPA of August 3, 1996) can be
reduced to 1X in assessing the risk
posed by this chemical.
D. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
Safety
To estimate total aggregate exposure
to a pesticide from food, drinking water,
and residential uses, the Agency
calculates DWLOCs which are used as a
point of comparison against the model
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51601
estimates of a pesticide’s concentration
in water (EECs). DWLOC values are not
regulatory standards for drinking water.
DWLOCs are theoretical upper limits on
a pesticide’s concentration in drinking
water in light of total aggregate exposure
to a pesticide in food and residential
uses. In calculating a DWLOC, the
Agency determines how much of the
acceptable exposure ( i.e., the PAD) is
available for exposure through drinking
water e.g., allowable chronic water
exposure mg/kg day = cPAD - (average
food + chronic non-dietary, nonoccupational exposure). This allowable
exposure through drinking water is used
to calculate a DWLOC.
A DWLOC will vary depending on the
toxic endpoint, drinking water
consumption, and body weights. Default
body weights and consumption values
as used by EPA Office of Water are used
to calculate DWLOCs: 2 liter (L)/70 kg
(adult male), 2L/60 kg (adult female),
and 1L/10 kg (child). Default body
weights and drinking water
consumption values vary on an
individual basis. This variation will be
taken into account in more refined
screening-level and quantitative
drinking water exposure assessments.
Different populations will have different
DWLOCs. Generally, a DWLOC is
calculated for each type of risk
assessment used: Acute, short-term,
intermediate-term, chronic, and cancer.
When EECs for surface water and
ground water are less than the
calculated DWLOCs, EPA concludes
with reasonable certainty that exposures
to methoxyfenozide in drinking water
(when considered along with other
sources of exposure for which EPA has
reliable data) would not result in
unacceptable levels of aggregate human
health risk at this time. Because EPA
considers the aggregate risk resulting
from multiple exposure pathways
associated with a pesticide’s uses, levels
of comparison in drinking water may
vary as those uses change. If new uses
are added in the future, EPA will
reassess the potential impacts of
methoxyfenozide on drinking water as a
part of the aggregate risk assessment
process.
1. Acute risk. No appropriate
endpoint was identified in the oral
toxicity studies including the acute
neurotoxicity study in rats and the
developmental toxicity studies in rats
and rabbits. Therefore, acute dietary risk
assessments were not conducted.
2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure
assumptions described in this unit for
chronic exposure, EPA has concluded
that exposure to methoxyfenozide from
food will utilize 23% of the cPAD for
the U.S. population, 37% of the cPAD
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
51602
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
for all infants < 1–year old, the infant
subpopulation at greatest exposure and
71% of the cPAD for children 1-2 years
old, the children subpopulation at
greatest exposure. There are no
residential uses for methoxyfenozide
that result in chronic residential
exposure to methoxyfenozide. In
addition, despite the potential for
chronic dietary exposure to
methoxyfenozide in drinking water,
after calculating DWLOCs and
comparing them to conservative model
estimated environmental concentrations
of methoxyfenozide in surface water
and ground water, EPA does not expect
the aggregate exposure to exceed 100%
of the cPAD, as shown in the following
Table 2:
TABLE 2.—AGGREGATE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CHRONIC (NON-CANCER) EXPOSURE TO METHOXYFENOZIDE
cPAD mg/
kg/day
Population Subgroup
Surface
Water EEC
(ppb)
%cPAD
(Food)
Ground
Water EEC
(ppb)
Chronic
DWLOC
(ppb)
U.S. population
0.10
23
30
3.5
2,700
Infants (< 1–year old)
0.10
37
30
3.5
630
Children (1-2 years old)
0.10
71
30
3.5
290
3. Short-term risk. Short-term and
intermediate-term aggregate exposures
take into account residential exposure
plus chronic exposure to food and water
(considered to be a background
exposure level).
Methoxyfenozide is not registered for
use on any sites that would result in
residential exposure. Therefore, the
aggregate risk is the sum of the risk from
food and water, which were previously
addressed.
4. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S.
population. Methoxyfenozide has been
classified as a ‘‘not likely’’ human
carcinogen. The classification is based
on the lack of evidence of
carcinogenicity in male and female rats
as well as in male and female mice and
on the lack of genotoxicity in an
acceptable battery of mutagenicity
studies. Therefore, risk assessments to
estimate cancer risk were not
conducted.
5. Determination of safety. Based on
these risk assessments, EPA concludes
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result to the general
population, and to infants and children
from aggregate exposure to
methoxyfenozide residues.
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology
is available to enforce the tolerance
expression. The method for use on corn
matrices (grain, forage, stover) is TR 34–
00–38. Information on the analytical
methodology may be requested from:
Calvin Furlow, Public Information
Resources and Services Branch (7502C),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel
Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C, 20460,
telephone number: (703) 305–5229; email address: furlow.calvin@epa.gov.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:14 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
B. International Residue Limits
There are no established or proposed
Codex, Canadian, or Mexican limits for
residues of methoxyfenozide in or on
plant or animal commodities. Therefore,
no compatibility issues exist regarding
the proposed U.S. tolerances.
for an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance issued by EPA under new
section 408(d) of the FFDCA, as was
provided in the old sections 408 and
409 of the FFDCA. However, the period
for filing objections is now 60 days,
rather than 30 days.
C. Conditions
Plantback (recropping) restrictions
should appear on the registered labels.
These restrictions should specify that
the crops for which methoxyfenozide
use is registered may be replanted at any
time, and all other crops grown for food
or feed may be replanted after 7 days.
The existing livestock tolerances are
adequate for the uses proposed under
these emergency exemptions.
A. What Do I Need to Do to File an
Objection or Request a Hearing?
You must file your objection or
request a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in this unit and in 40 CFR part
178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
you must identify docket ID number
OPP–2005–0224 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
on or before October 31, 2005.
1. Filing the request. Your objection
must specify the specific provisions in
the regulation that you object to, and the
grounds for the objections (40 CFR
178.25). If a hearing is requested, the
objections must include a statement of
the factual issue(s) on which a hearing
is requested, the requestor’s contentions
on such issues, and a summary of any
evidence relied upon by the objector (40
CFR 178.27). Information submitted in
connection with an objection or hearing
request may be claimed confidential by
marking any part or all of that
information as CBI. Information so
marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2. A copy of the
information that does not contain CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public record. Information not marked
confidential may be disclosed publicly
by EPA without prior notice.
Mail your written request to: Office of
the Hearing Clerk (1900L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001. You may also deliver
VI. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established
for residues of methoxyfenozide,
benzoic acid, 3-methoxy-2-methyl-2(3,5-dimethylbenzoyl)-2-(1,1dimethylethyl)hydrazide, in or on grain
sorghum at 0.05 ppm, grain sorghum
forage at 15 ppm, and grain sorghum
stover at 125 ppm.
VII. Objections and Hearing Requests
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as
amended by the FQPA, any person may
file an objection to any aspect of this
regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. The EPA
procedural regulations which govern the
submission of objections and requests
for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.
Although the procedures in those
regulations require some modification to
reflect the amendments made to the
FFDCA by the FQPA, EPA will continue
to use those procedures, with
appropriate adjustments, until the
necessary modifications can be made.
The new section 408(g) of the FFDCA
provides essentially the same process
for persons to ‘‘object’’ to a regulation
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
your request to the Office of the Hearing
Clerk in Suite 350, 1099 14th St., NW.,
Washington, DC 2005. The Office of the
Hearing Clerk is open from 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is
(202) 564–6255.
2. Copies for the Docket. In addition
to filing an objection or hearing request
with the Hearing Clerk as described in
Unit VII.A., you should also send a copy
of your request to the PIRIB for its
inclusion in the official record that is
described in ADDRESSES. Mail your
copies, identified by the docket ID
number OPP–2005–0224, to: Public
Information and Records Integrity
Branch, Information Resources and
Services Division (7502C), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001. In person or by courier, bring a
copy to the location of the PIRIB
described in ADDRESSES. You may also
send an electronic copy of your request
via e-mail to: opp-docket@epa.gov.
Please use an ASCII file format and
avoid the use of special characters and
any form of encryption. Copies of
electronic objections and hearing
requests will also be accepted on disks
in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 or ASCII file
format. Do not include any CBI in your
electronic copy. You may also submit an
electronic copy of your request at many
Federal Depository Libraries.
B. When Will the Agency Grant a
Request for a Hearing?
A request for a hearing will be granted
if the Administrator determines that the
material submitted shows the following:
There is a genuine and substantial issue
of fact; there is a reasonable possibility
that available evidence identified by the
requestor would, if established resolve
one or more of such issues in favor of
the requestor, taking into account
uncontested claims or facts to the
contrary; and resolution of the factual
issue(s) in the manner sought by the
requestor would be adequate to justify
the action requested (40 CFR 178.32).
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes timelimited tolerances] under section 408 of
the FFDCA. The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has exempted these
types of actions from review under
Executive Order 12866, entitled
Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993). Because this
rule has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866 due to its
lack of significance, this rule is not
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:14 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This final rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any
enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public
Law 104–4). Nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994); or OMB review or any Agency
action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are
established on the basis of a FIFRA
section 18 exemption under section 408
of the FFDCA, such as the tolerances in
this final rule, do not require the
issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply. In addition, the
Agency has determined that this action
will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Executive Order 13132 requires
EPA to develop an accountable process
to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies
that have federalism implications’’ is
defined in the Executive Order to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ This final rule
directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States. This action does not
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51603
alter the relationships or distribution of
power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption
provisions of section 408(n)(4) of the
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the
Agency has determined that this rule
does not have any ‘‘tribal implications’’
as described in Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000). Executive
Order 13175, requires EPA to develop
an accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal
officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal
implications’’ is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations
that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
rule will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
IX. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of this final
rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
51604
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: August 19, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
2. In § 180.554, the table in paragraph
(b) is amended by alphabetically adding
commodities to read as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
§ 180.544 Methoxyfenozide; tolerance for
residues.
*
Commodity
*
*
(b) * * *
Parts per million
sorghum, grain
sorghum, grain, forage
sorghum, grain, stover
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP–2005–0217; FRL–7731–6]
Flonicamid; Pesticide Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a
tolerance for combined residues of
flonicamid and its metabolites in or on
certain plant and livestock
commodities. ISK Biosciences requested
this tolerance under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as
amended by the Food Quality Protection
Act of 1996 (FQPA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
August 31, 2005. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before October 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: To submit a written
objection or hearing request follow the
detailed instructions as provided in
Unit VI. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
identification (ID) number OPP–2005–
0217. All documents in the docket are
listed in the EDOCKET index athttps://
www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed
in the index, some information is not
publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
copy at the Public Information and
Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm.
119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
16:14 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
Arlington, VA. This docket facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann
Sibold, Registration Division (7505C),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–6502; e-mail
address:sibold.ann@epa.gov.
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS 111), e.g.,
agricultural workers; greenhouse,
nursery, and floriculture workers;
farmers.
• Animal production (NAICS 112),
e.g., cattle ranchers and farmers, dairy
cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
• Food manufacturing (NAICS 311),
e.g., agricultural workers; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; ranchers; pesticide applicators.
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
32532), e.g., agricultural workers;
commercial applicators; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; residential users.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Expiration/revocation date
0.05
15
125
[FR Doc. 05–17131 Filed 8–30–05; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<18>2005
*
12/31/2007
12/31/2007
12/31/2007
the person listed underFOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document and Other Related
Information?
In addition to using EDOCKET (https://
www.epa.gov/edocket/), you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A
frequently updated electronic version of
40 CFR part 180 is available at E-CFR
Beta Site Two at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/. To access the
OPPTS Harmonized Guidelines
referenced in this document, go directly
to the guidelines athttps://www.epa.gpo/
opptsfrs/home/guidelin.htm/.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of May 23,
2003 (68 FR 28218) (FRL–7307–5), EPA
issued a notice pursuant to section
408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 3F6552) by ISK
Biosciences, 7470 Auburn Road, suite
A, Concord, Ohio 44077. The petition
requested that 40 CFR part 180 be
amended by establishing a tolerance for
the combined residues of the insecticide
flonicamid, [N-(cyanomethyl)-4trifluoromethylnicotinamide] and its
metabolites, TFNA, (4trifluoromethylnicotinic acid), TFNAAM, (4-trifluoromethylnicotinamide)
and TFNG, [N-(4trifluoromethylnicotinoyl)glycine] in or
on the raw agricultural commodities:
Celery, at 1.2 parts per million (ppm);
cotton, at 0.5 ppm; cotton, gin trash, at
6.0 ppm; cotton, hulls, at 1.0 ppm;
cotton, meal, at 1.0 ppm; fruit, pome,
group 11, at 0.2 ppm; fruit, stone, group
12, except plum and fresh prune plum,
at 0.7 ppm; lettuce, head, at 1.0 ppm;
lettuce, leaf, at 4.0 ppm; plum, at 0.1
ppm; potato, at 0.2 ppm; potato, flakes,
at 0.4 ppm; prune, fresh, at 0.1; spinach,
at 9.0 ppm; tomato, paste, at 2.0 ppm;
tomato, puree, at 0.5 ppm; vegetable,
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 31, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51597-51604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17131]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP-2005-0224; FRL-7732-3]
Methoxyfenozide; Pesticide Tolerances for Emergency Exemptions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes time-limited tolerances for
residues of methoxyfenozide in or on sorghum grain, sorghum grain
forage, and sorghum grain stover. This action is in response to EPA's
granting of an emergency exemption under section 18 of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizing use of
the pesticide on sorghum grain. This regulation establishes a maximum
permissible level for residues of methoxyfenozide in these food
commodities. These tolerances will expire and are revoked on December
31, 2007.
DATES: This regulation is effective August 31, 2005. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before October 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: To submit a written objection or hearing request follow the
detailed instructions as provided in Unit VII. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number OPP-2005-0224. All documents in the docket
are listed in the EDOCKET index at https://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in EDOCKET or in hard copy at the Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall2, 1801 S. Bell
St., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket
telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacey Milan Groce, Registration
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 305-2505; e-mail address:
milan.stacey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111)
Animal production (NAICS code 112)
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311)
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532)
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document and Other
Related Information?
In addition to using EDOCKET (https://www.epa.gov/edocket/), you may
access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA
Internet under the ``Federal Register'' listings at https://www.epa.gov/
fedrgstr/. A frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
is available on E-CFR Beta Site Two at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
EPA, on its own initiative, in accordance with sections 408(e) and
408 (l)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21
U.S.C. 346a, is establishing tolerances for residues of the insecticide
methoxyfenozide, benzoic acid, 3-methoxy-2-methyl-2-(3,5-
dimethylbenzoyl)-2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)hydrazide, in or on sorghum grain
at 0.05 parts per million (ppm), sorghum grain forage at 15 ppm, and
sorghum grain stover at 125 ppm. These tolerances will expire and are
revoked on December 31, 2007. EPA will publish a document in the
Federal Register to remove the revoked tolerances from the Code of
Federal Regulations.
Section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA requires EPA to establish time-
limited tolerances or exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance
for pesticide chemical residues in food that will result from the use
of a pesticide under an emergency exemption granted by EPA under
section 18 of FIFRA. Such tolerances can be established without
providing notice or period for public comment. EPA does not intend for
its actions on section 18 related tolerances to set binding precedents
for the application of section 408 of the FFDCA and the new safety
standard to other tolerances and exemptions. Section 408(e) of the
FFDCA allows EPA to establish a tolerance or an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance on its own initiative, i.e., without having
received any petition from an outside party.
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes
[[Page 51598]]
exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does
not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA
requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and
children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance
and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .''
Section 18 of the FIFRA authorizes EPA to exempt any Federal or
State agency from any provision of FIFRA, if EPA determines that
``emergency conditions exist which require such exemption.'' This
provision was not amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
(FQPA). EPA has established regulations governing such emergency
exemptions in 40 CFR part 166.
III. Emergency Exemption for Methoxyfenozide on Sorghum Grain, Sorghum
Grain Forage, Sorghum Grain Stover and FFDCA Tolerances
The southwestern corn borer is a major pest on corn, but has become
problematic for Louisiana sorghum producers in recent years. The
southwestern corn borer is known to infest grain sorghum and had not
been documented as an important pest of this crop until 2002, when
heavy moth infestations developed in corn and migrated to late planted
sorghum fields. Grain sorghum is usually planted in the spring, but
adverse weather conditions and planting conflicts ensure that a
significant amount of acreage will be planted late. These conditions
can provide a susceptible host for heavy southwestern corn borer moth
flight during late summer. This unexpected heavy migration into grain
sorghum has left many growers without adequate technology to control
this pest.
The sugarcane borer is a major pest of corn grown in the vicinity
of sugarcane. The sugarcane borer recently became an important pest of
corn in parts of Louisiana where no sugarcane is produced. This
northern shift in the infestation range of the sugarcane borer is
likely the result of mild winters and an increase in reduced tillage
crop production, which has allowed this pest to become established
outside of its normal range. Heavy populations of sugarcane borer moth
infestations have migrated to late planted sorghum fields and growers
have been ill-prepared in handling this disease.
The Louisiana State AgCenter recommends the following two
insecticides: Cypermethrin and lambda-cyhalothrin for control of the
southwestern corn borer when they are applied before the larvae bore
into the stalk. However, the short-lived residual effectiveness of both
pyrethroids requires an effective scouting program to carefully time
applications. This practice is not available in Louisiana and there are
currently no insecticides registered for control of the sugarcane borer
on grain sorghum. Methoxyfenozide is a suitable alternative because of
its moderate residual life and low risk to humans and most non-target
organisms.
Planting grain sorghum early is an important management practice
against both the southwestern corn borer and the sugarcane borer. Early
planted sorghum usually matures before southwestern corn borer and
sugarcane borer populations reach their peak migration from their host
plants. However, this practice is limited by weather conditions, which
often delay planting sorghum acreage until late spring and early
summer. Shredding the crop stubble followed by tillage is no longer
feasible since most sorghum is now grown under reduced tillage
conditions. Natural enemies destroy large numbers of the southwestern
corn borer, but not at levels necessary to prevent significant loss.
EPA has authorized under FIFRA section 18 the use of methoxyfenozide on
grain sorghum to control southwestern corn borer and sugarcane borer
for use on grain sorghum in Louisiana. After having reviewed the
submission, EPA concurs that emergency conditions exist for this State.
As part of its assessment of this emergency exemption, EPA assessed
the potential risks presented by residues of methoxyfenozide in or on
sorghum grain, sorghum grain forage, and sorghum grain stover. In doing
so, EPA considered the safety standard in section 408(b)(2) of the
FFDCA, and EPA decided that the necessary tolerances under section
408(l)(6) of the FFDCA would be consistent with the safety standard and
with FIFRA section 18. Consistent with the need to move quickly on the
emergency exemption in order to address an urgent non-routine situation
and to ensure that the resulting food is safe and lawful, EPA is
issuing these tolerances without notice and opportunity for public
comment as provided in section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA. Although these
tolerances will expire and are revoked on December 31, 2007, under
section 408(l)(5) of the FFDCA, residues of the pesticide not in excess
of the amounts specified in the tolerance remaining in or on sorghum
grain, sorghum grain forage, sorghum grain stover after that date will
not be unlawful, provided the pesticide is applied in a manner that was
lawful under FIFRA, and the residues do not exceed a level that was
authorized by these tolerances at the time of that application. EPA
will take action to revoke these tolerances earlier if any experience
with, scientific data on, or other relevant information on this
pesticide indicate that the residues are not safe.
Because these tolerances are being approved under emergency
conditions, EPA has not made any decisions about whether
methoxyfenozide meets EPA's registration requirements for use on
sorghum grain, sorghum grain forage, sorghum grain stover or whether
permanent tolerances for this use would be appropriate. Under these
circumstances, EPA does not believe that these tolerances serves as a
basis for registration of methoxyfenozide by a State for special local
needs under FIFRA section 24(c). Nor do these tolerances serve as the
basis for any State other than Louisiana to use this pesticide on this
crop under section 18 of FIFRA without following all provisions of
EPA's regulations implementing FIFRA section 18 as identified in 40 CFR
part 166. For additional information regarding the emergency exemption
for methoxyfenozide, contact the Agency's Registration Division at the
address provided under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the
regulatory requirements of section 408 of the FFDCA and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see the final rule on
Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances of November 26, 1997 (62 FR 62961)
(FRL-5754-7).
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed
the available scientific data and other relevant information in support
of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of
methoxyfenozide and to make a determination on aggregate exposure,
consistent with section 408(b)(2) of the FFDCA, for time-limited
tolerances for residues of methoxyfenozide in or on sorghum grain at
0.05 ppm, sorghum grain forage at 15 ppm, and sorghum grain stover at
125 ppm. EPA's assessment of the dietary exposures and risks associated
with establishing these tolerances follows.
[[Page 51599]]
A. Toxicological Endpoints
The dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL) from
the toxicology study identified as appropriate for use in risk
assessment is used to estimate the toxicological endpoint. However, the
lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified (the
LOAEL) is sometimes used for risk assessment if no NOAEL was achieved
in the toxicology study selected. An uncertainty factor (UF) is applied
to reflect uncertainties inherent in the extrapolation from laboratory
animal data to humans and in the variations in sensitivity among
members of the human population as well as other unknowns. An UF of 100
is routinely used, 10X to account for interspecies differences and 10X
for intra species differences.
For dietary risk assessments (other than cancer) the Agency uses
the UF to calculate an acute or chronic reference dose (aRfD or cRfD)
where + the RfD is equal to the NOAEL divided by the appropriate UF
(RfD = NOAEL/UF). Where an additional safety factor is retained due to
concerns unique to the FQPA, this additional factor is applied to the
RfD by dividing the RfD by such additional factor. The acute or chronic
Population Adjusted Dose (aPAD or cPAD) is a modification of the RfD to
accommodate this type of FQPA SF.
For non-dietary risk assessments (other than cancer) the UF is used
to determine the level of concern (LOC). For example, when 100 is the
appropriate UF (10X to account for interspecies differences and 10X for
intraspecies differences) the LOC is 100. To estimate risk, a ratio of
the NOAEL to exposures (margin of exposure (MOE) = NOAEL/exposure) is
calculated and compared to the LOC.
The linear default risk methodology (Q*) is the primary method
currently used by the Agency to quantify carcinogenic risk. The Q*
approach assumes that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree
of cancer risk. A Q* is calculated and used to estimate risk which
represents a probability of occurrence of additional cancer cases
(e.g., risk is expressed as 1 x 10-6 or one in a million).
Under certain specific circumstances, MOE calculations will be used for
the carcinogenic risk assessment. In this non-linear approach, a
``point of departure'' is identified below which carcinogenic effects
are not expected. The point of departure is typically a NOAEL based on
an endpoint related to cancer effects though it may be a different
value derived from the dose response curve. To estimate risk, a ratio
of the point of departure to exposure (MOEcancer = point of
departure/exposures) is calculated. A summary of the toxicological
endpoints for methoxyfenozide used for human risk assessment is shown
in the following Table 1:
Table 1.--Summary of Toxicological Dose and Endpoints for Methoxyfenozide for Use in Human Risk Assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FQPA SF* and Level of
Exposure Scenario Dose Used in Risk Concern for Risk Study and Toxicological
Assessment, UF Assessment Effects
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acute dietary (females 13-50 years of None None No appropriate endpoint
age and the general population was identified in the
including infants and children) oral toxicity studies,
including the acute
neurotoxicity study in
rats and the
developmental toxicity
studies in rats and
rabbits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chronic dietary all populations NOAEL = 10.2 mg/kg/day FQPA SF = 1 2-Year combined chronic
UF = 100............... cPAD = chronic RfD..... feeding/
Chronic RfD = 0.10 mg/ FQPA SF = 0.10 mg/kg/ carcinogenicity, rats
kg/day. day. LOAEL = 411 mg/kg/day
based on hematological
changes (decreased
RBC, hemoglobin and
hematocrit), liver
toxicity (increased
weights, hypertrophy),
histopathological
changes in thyroid
(increased follicular
cell hyppertrophy,
altered colloid),
possible adrenal
toxicity (increased
weights)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Short-term, intermediate-term, long- None None No systemic toxicity
term dermal and Inhalation was observed at the
limit dose following
repeated dermal
application to rats
Based on low vapor
pressure, the low
acute toxicity of both
the technical and
formulated products as
well as the
application rate and
application method,
there is minimal
concern for inhalation
exposure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cancer (oral, dermal, inhalation) Methoxyfenozide has ....................... The classification is
been classified as a based on the lack of
``not likely'' human evidence of
carcinogen carcinogenicity in
male and female rats
as well as in male and
female mice and on the
lack of genotoxocity
in an acceptable
battery of
mutagenicity studies
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*The reference to the FQPA SF refers to any additional SF retained due to concerns unique to the FQPA.
B. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. Tolerances have been
established (40 CFR 180.544) for the residues of methoxyfenozide, in or
on a variety of raw agricultural commodities including the pome fruits
crop group, apple pomace, cotton seed, cotton gin byproducts, sweet
corn, field corn, milk, meat, fat, liver, and meat byproducts of
cattle, goats, hogs, horses, and sheep. Risk assessments were conducted
by EPA to assess dietary exposures from methoxyfenozide in food as
follows:
i. Acute exposure. Acute dietary risk assessments are performed for
a food-
[[Page 51600]]
use pesticide if a toxicological study has indicated the possibility of
an effect of concern occurring as a result of a 1-day or single
exposure. No appropriate endpoint was identified in the oral toxicity
studies including the acute neurotoxicity study in rats and the
developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits. Therefore, acute
dietary risk assessments were not conducted.
ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting this chronic dietary risk
assessment the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model (DEEMTM)
analysis evaluated the individual food consumption as reported by
respondents in the United States Department of agriculture (USDA) 1989-
1992 nationwide Continuing Surveys of Food Intake by Individuals
(CSFII) and accumulated exposure to the chemical for each commodity.
The following assumptions were made for the chronic exposure
assessments: 100% of all crops were treated and all resulting residues
were at tolerance level.
iii. Cancer. Methoxyfenozide has been classified as a ``not likely
human carcinogen.'' The classification is based on the lack of evidence
of carcinogenicity in male and female rats as well as in male and
female mice and on the lack of genotoxicity in an acceptable battery of
mutagenicity studies. Therefore, risk assessments to estimate cancer
were not conducted.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency lacks
sufficient monitoring exposure data to complete a comprehensive dietary
exposure analysis and risk assessment for methoxyfenozide in drinking
water. Because the Agency does not have comprehensive monitoring data,
drinking water concentration estimates are made by reliance on
simulation or modeling taking into account data on the physical
characteristics of methoxyfenozide.
The Agency uses the Generic Estimated Environmental Concentration
(GENEEC) or the Pesticide Root Zone/Exposure Analysis Modeling System
(PRZM/EXAMS) to estimate pesticide concentrations in surface water and
SCI-GROW, which predicts pesticide concentrations in ground water. In
general, EPA will use GENEEC (a Tier 1 model) before using PRZM/EXAMS
(a Tier 2 model) for a screening-level assessment for surface water.
The GENEEC model is a subset of the PRZM/EXAMS model that uses a
specific high-end runoff scenario for pesticides. GENEEC incorporates a
farm pond scenario, while PRZM/EXAMS incorporate an index reservoir
environment in place of the previous pond scenario. The PRZM/EXAMS
model includes a percent crop (PC) area factor as an adjustment to
account for the maximum percent crop coverage within a watershed or
drainage basin.
The Agency uses the First Index Reservoir Screening Tool (FIRST) or
the PRZM/EXAMS to produce estimates of pesticide concentrations in an
index reservoir. The SCI-GROW model is used to predict pesticide
concentrations in shallow ground water. For a screening-level
assessment for surface water EPA will generally use FIRST (a Tier 1
model) before using PRZM/EXAMS (a Tier 2 model). The FIRST model is a
subset of the PRZM/EXAMS model that uses a specific high-end runoff
scenario for pesticides. While both FIRST and PRZM/EXAMS incorporate an
index reservoir environment, the PRZM/EXAMS model includes a PC area
factor as an adjustment to account for the maximum percent crop
coverage within a watershed or drainage basin.
None of these models include consideration of the impact processing
(mixing, dilution, or treatment) of raw water for distribution as
drinking water would likely have on the removal of pesticides from the
source water. The primary use of these models by the Agency at this
stage is to provide a coarse screen for sorting out pesticides for
which it is highly unlikely that drinking water concentrations would
ever exceed human health levels of concern.
Since the models used are considered to be screening tools in the
risk assessment process, the Agency does not use estimated
environmental concentrations (EECs) from these models to quantify
drinking water exposure and risk as a %RfD or %PAD. Instead drinking
water levels of comparison (DWLOCs) are calculated and used as a point
of comparison against the model estimates of a pesticide's
concentration in water. DWLOCs are theoretical upper limits on a
pesticide's concentration in drinking water in light of total aggregate
exposure to a pesticide in food, and from residential uses. Since
DWLOCs address total aggregate exposure to methoxyfenozide, they are
further discussed in the aggregate risk sections below.
Based on the PRZM/EXAMS and SCI-GROW models the estimated
environmental concentrations (EECs) of methoxyfenozide for chronic
exposures are estimated to be 30 parts per billion (ppb) for surface
water and 3.5 ppb for ground water.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets).
Methoxyfenozide is not registered for use on any sites that would
result in residential exposure.
4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative
risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made
a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to methoxyfenozide and any
other substances and methoxyfenozide does not appear to produce a toxic
metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this
tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not assumed that methoxyfenozide
has a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For
information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a
common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of
such chemicals, see the policy statements released by EPA's Office of
Pesticide Programs concerning common mechanism determinations and
procedures for cumulating effects from substances found to have a
common mechanism on EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/
cumulative/.
C. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
1. In general. Section 408 of the FFDCA provides that EPA shall
apply an additional tenfold margin of safety (MOS) for infants and
children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and
postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the data base on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines that a different MOS will be safe
for infants and children. MOS are incorporated into EPA risk
assessments either directly through use of a MOE analysis or through
using uncertainty (safety) factors in calculating a dose level that
poses no appreciable risk to humans.
2. Developmental toxicity studies. In a developmental toxicity
study in rats regarding maternal findings, there were no deaths
orclinical signs, nor were there any effects on body weights or food
consumption. No changes were noted in any of the reproductive
parameters. Fetal examinations did not
[[Page 51601]]
reveal any effects on body weight or gross/visceral/skeletal aspects.
The maternal NOAEL is 1,000 milligram/ kilogram/day (mg/kg/day) Highest
dose tested (HDT) and the maternal LOAEL is greater than 1,000 mg/kg/
day. The developmental NOAEL is 1,000 mg/kg/day and the developmental
LOAEL is greater than 1,000 mg/kg/day.
In a developmental toxicity study in rabbits regarding maternal
findings, there were no deaths or clinical signs, nor were there any
effects on body weights, weight gains, or food consumption. No changes
were noted in any of the reproductive parameters. Fetal examinations
did not reveal any effects on body weight or gross/visceral/skeletal
aspects. The maternal NOAEL is 1,000 mg/kg/day HDT, and the maternal
LOAEL is greater than 1,000 mg/kg/day. The developmental NOAEL is 1,000
mg/kg day and the developmental LOAEL is greater than 1,000 mg/kg day.
3. Reproductive toxicity study. In a 2-generation reproduction
study, the LOAEL for systemic toxicity is 20,000 ppm (1,551.9 mg/kg
day), based on increased absolute and relative liver weights in males
and females and on the hepatocellular hypertrophy in males and females.
The NOAEL for systemic toxicity is 2,000 ppm (153.4 mg/kg/day). There
were no treatment related reproductive effects on the P1 and
P2 males and females or their F1 and
F2 offspring. Therefore, the NOAEL for reproductive toxicity
is greater than 20,000 ppm (1,551.9-2,036.5 mg/kg day) HDT. The LOAEL
for reproductive toxicity was not identified.
4. Neurotoxicity. In an acute oral neurotoxicity study in rats,
there were no observable signs of a neurotoxic effect at the highest
concentration in females. Functional observational battery (FOB)
assessment on day 0 revealed a decrease in hindlimb grip strength for
males in the 2,000 mg/kg group. Motor activity assessment remained
comparable to controls throughout the study for males and females in
all exposure groups. No neuropathological endpoints were observed
during the histological examinations of the peripheral or central
nervous systems of these animals at any exposure concentration. Based
on the absence of any substance related effects on body weight or body
weight gain and any clinical signs of toxicity, the NOAEL for systemic
toxicity is a concentration of 2,000 mg/kg for males and females. The
NOAEL for neurotoxic effects is 200 mg/kg for females. Based on a
decrease in hindlimb grip strength on day 0 in the 2,000 mg/kg male
group, the NOAEL for males is 1,000 mg/kg and the LOAEL for males is
2,000 mg/kg. No LOAEL was established for systemic effects in males or
females or for neurotoxic effects in females.
In a subchronic oral neurotoxicity study in rats, there were no
observable signs of a neurotoxic effect at the highest concentration in
males or females. FOB and MA remained comparable to controls throughout
the study and no neuropathological endpoints were observed during the
histological exams of these animals at any exposure concentration.
Based on the absence of any substance related effects on body weight or
body weight gain and any clinical signs of toxicity, the NOAEL for
systemic toxicity is also 2,000 ppm for males (1,318 mg/kg/day), and
females (1,577 mg/kg/day). No LOAEL was established for systemic or
neurotoxic effects.
In none of the other oral toxicity studies on methoxyfenozide were
there any signs of neurotoxicity. The studies considered included all
the available toxicology studies on methoxyfenozide.
5. Conclusion. There is a complete toxicity data base for
methoxyfenozide and no additional studies are required at this time.
The scientific and regulatory quality of the toxicology data base for
methoxyfenozide is high and is considered sufficient to clearly define
the toxicity of this chemical. There is, therefore, high confidence in
the hazard and dose-response assessments conducted for this chemical.
Exposure data are complete or are estimated based on data that
reasonably accounts for potential exposures.
The toxicology data provided no indication of increased
susceptibility in rats or rabbits from in utero and/or post natal
exposure to methoxyfenozide. In the prenatal developmental toxicity
studies in rats and rabbits, no developmental toxicity was observed at
the limit dose, which is the HDT. In the 2-generation reproduction
study in rats, no effects in the offspring were observed at the HDT. In
none of the oral toxicity studies on methoxyfenozide were there any
signs of neurotoxicity. The studies considered included all the
available toxicology studies on methoxyfenozide.
Therefore, the Agency has determined that the FQPA Safety Factor
(as required by the FQPA of August 3, 1996) can be reduced to 1X in
assessing the risk posed by this chemical.
D. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety
To estimate total aggregate exposure to a pesticide from food,
drinking water, and residential uses, the Agency calculates DWLOCs
which are used as a point of comparison against the model estimates of
a pesticide's concentration in water (EECs). DWLOC values are not
regulatory standards for drinking water. DWLOCs are theoretical upper
limits on a pesticide's concentration in drinking water in light of
total aggregate exposure to a pesticide in food and residential uses.
In calculating a DWLOC, the Agency determines how much of the
acceptable exposure ( i.e., the PAD) is available for exposure through
drinking water e.g., allowable chronic water exposure mg/kg day = cPAD
- (average food + chronic non-dietary, non-occupational exposure). This
allowable exposure through drinking water is used to calculate a DWLOC.
A DWLOC will vary depending on the toxic endpoint, drinking water
consumption, and body weights. Default body weights and consumption
values as used by EPA Office of Water are used to calculate DWLOCs: 2
liter (L)/70 kg (adult male), 2L/60 kg (adult female), and 1L/10 kg
(child). Default body weights and drinking water consumption values
vary on an individual basis. This variation will be taken into account
in more refined screening-level and quantitative drinking water
exposure assessments. Different populations will have different DWLOCs.
Generally, a DWLOC is calculated for each type of risk assessment used:
Acute, short-term, intermediate-term, chronic, and cancer.
When EECs for surface water and ground water are less than the
calculated DWLOCs, EPA concludes with reasonable certainty that
exposures to methoxyfenozide in drinking water (when considered along
with other sources of exposure for which EPA has reliable data) would
not result in unacceptable levels of aggregate human health risk at
this time. Because EPA considers the aggregate risk resulting from
multiple exposure pathways associated with a pesticide's uses, levels
of comparison in drinking water may vary as those uses change. If new
uses are added in the future, EPA will reassess the potential impacts
of methoxyfenozide on drinking water as a part of the aggregate risk
assessment process.
1. Acute risk. No appropriate endpoint was identified in the oral
toxicity studies including the acute neurotoxicity study in rats and
the developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits. Therefore,
acute dietary risk assessments were not conducted.
2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this
unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that exposure to
methoxyfenozide from food will utilize 23% of the cPAD for the U.S.
population, 37% of the cPAD
[[Page 51602]]
for all infants < 1-year old, the infant subpopulation at greatest
exposure and 71% of the cPAD for children 1-2 years old, the children
subpopulation at greatest exposure. There are no residential uses for
methoxyfenozide that result in chronic residential exposure to
methoxyfenozide. In addition, despite the potential for chronic dietary
exposure to methoxyfenozide in drinking water, after calculating DWLOCs
and comparing them to conservative model estimated environmental
concentrations of methoxyfenozide in surface water and ground water,
EPA does not expect the aggregate exposure to exceed 100% of the cPAD,
as shown in the following Table 2:
Table 2.--Aggregate Risk Assessment for Chronic (Non-Cancer) Exposure to Methoxyfenozide
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surface Ground
Population Subgroup cPAD mg/kg/ %cPAD Water EEC Water EEC Chronic
day (Food) (ppb) (ppb) DWLOC (ppb)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. population 0.10 23 30 3.5 2,700
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infants (< 1-year old) 0.10 37 30 3.5 630
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Children (1-2 years old) 0.10 71 30 3.5 290
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Short-term risk. Short-term and intermediate-term aggregate
exposures take into account residential exposure plus chronic exposure
to food and water (considered to be a background exposure level).
Methoxyfenozide is not registered for use on any sites that would
result in residential exposure. Therefore, the aggregate risk is the
sum of the risk from food and water, which were previously addressed.
4. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. Methoxyfenozide has
been classified as a ``not likely'' human carcinogen. The
classification is based on the lack of evidence of carcinogenicity in
male and female rats as well as in male and female mice and on the lack
of genotoxicity in an acceptable battery of mutagenicity studies.
Therefore, risk assessments to estimate cancer risk were not conducted.
5. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, and to infants and children from aggregate
exposure to methoxyfenozide residues.
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology is available to enforce the
tolerance expression. The method for use on corn matrices (grain,
forage, stover) is TR 34-00-38. Information on the analytical
methodology may be requested from: Calvin Furlow, Public Information
Resources and Services Branch (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C, 20460, telephone number: (703) 305-5229;
e-mail address: furlow.calvin@epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
There are no established or proposed Codex, Canadian, or Mexican
limits for residues of methoxyfenozide in or on plant or animal
commodities. Therefore, no compatibility issues exist regarding the
proposed U.S. tolerances.
C. Conditions
Plantback (recropping) restrictions should appear on the registered
labels. These restrictions should specify that the crops for which
methoxyfenozide use is registered may be replanted at any time, and all
other crops grown for food or feed may be replanted after 7 days.
The existing livestock tolerances are adequate for the uses
proposed under these emergency exemptions.
VI. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of
methoxyfenozide, benzoic acid, 3-methoxy-2-methyl-2-(3,5-
dimethylbenzoyl)-2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)hydrazide, in or on grain sorghum
at 0.05 ppm, grain sorghum forage at 15 ppm, and grain sorghum stover
at 125 ppm.
VII. Objections and Hearing Requests
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those
regulations require some modification to reflect the amendments made to
the FFDCA by the FQPA, EPA will continue to use those procedures, with
appropriate adjustments, until the necessary modifications can be made.
The new section 408(g) of the FFDCA provides essentially the same
process for persons to ``object'' to a regulation for an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance issued by EPA under new section 408(d)
of the FFDCA, as was provided in the old sections 408 and 409 of the
FFDCA. However, the period for filing objections is now 60 days, rather
than 30 days.
A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this
regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit
and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number OPP-2005-0224 in the subject line on the
first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and
must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before October
31, 2005.
1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific
provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for
the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the
objections must include a statement of the factual issue(s) on which a
hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a
summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27).
Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing
request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that
information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except
in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the
information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion
in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.
Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. You may also deliver
[[Page 51603]]
your request to the Office of the Hearing Clerk in Suite 350, 1099 14th
St., NW., Washington, DC 2005. The Office of the Hearing Clerk is open
from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
The telephone number for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is (202) 564-
6255.
2. Copies for the Docket. In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit VII.A., you
should also send a copy of your request to the PIRIB for its inclusion
in the official record that is described in ADDRESSES. Mail your
copies, identified by the docket ID number OPP-2005-0224, to: Public
Information and Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources and
Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001. In person or by courier, bring a copy to the location of the
PIRIB described in ADDRESSES. You may also send an electronic copy of
your request via e-mail to: opp-docket@epa.gov. Please use an ASCII
file format and avoid the use of special characters and any form of
encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests will
also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 or ASCII file format.
Do not include any CBI in your electronic copy. You may also submit an
electronic copy of your request at many Federal Depository Libraries.
B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing?
A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator
determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a
genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable
possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would,
if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the
requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the
contrary; and resolution of the factual issue(s) in the manner sought
by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40
CFR 178.32).
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes time-limited tolerances] under section
408 of the FFDCA. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993). Because this rule has been exempted from review under Executive
Order 12866 due to its lack of significance, this rule is not subject
to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001). This final rule does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4). Nor
does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994);
or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not
involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration
of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA),
Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a FIFRA
section 18 exemption under section 408 of the FFDCA, such as the
tolerances in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a
proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has
determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132,
entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order
13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' This final
rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and
food retailers, not States. This action does not alter the
relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of the
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this rule
does not have any ``tribal implications'' as described in Executive
Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000). Executive Order 13175,
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.'' This rule will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
IX. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 51604]]
Dated: August 19, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.554, the table in paragraph (b) is amended by
alphabetically adding commodities to read as follows:
Sec. 180.544 Methoxyfenozide; tolerance for residues.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commodity Parts per million Expiration/revocation date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sorghum, grain 0.05 12/31/2007
sorghum, grain, forage 15 12/31/2007
sorghum, grain, stover 125 12/31/2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-17131 Filed 8-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S