Guidance for Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), 51863-51880 [05-16647]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
1970; E.O. 11541, 35 FR 10737, 3 CFR,
1966—1970, p. 939.
2. Section 1.205 is revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 1.205 Applicability to grants and other
funding instruments.
The types of instruments that are
subject to the guidance in this subtitle
vary from one portion of the guidance
to another (note that each part identifies
the types of instruments to which it
applies). All portions of the guidance
apply to grants and cooperative
agreements, some portions also apply to
other types of financial assistance or
nonprocurement instruments, and some
portions also apply to procurement
contracts. For example, the:
(a) Guidance on debarment and
suspension in part 180 of this subtitle
applies broadly to all financial
assistance and other nonprocurement
transactions, and not just to grants and
cooperative agreements.
(b) Cost principles in parts 220, 225
and 230 of this subtitle apply to
procurement contracts, as well as to
financial assistance, although those
principles are implemented for
procurement contracts through the
Federal Acquisition Regulation in Title
51863
48 of the CFR, rather than through
Federal agency regulations on grants
and agreements in this title.
3. Section 1.215 is revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 1.215 Relationship to previous
issuances.
Although some of the guidance was
organized differently within OMB
circulars or other documents, much of
the guidance in this subtitle existed
prior to the establishment of title 2 of
the CFR. Specifically:
Guidance in . . .
On . . .
Previously was in . . .
(a) Chapter I, part 180 .......................................
Nonprocurement debarment and suspension
(b) Chapter II, part 215 ......................................
Administrative requirements for grants and
agreements.
Cost principles for educational institutions ......
Cost principles for State, local, and Indian
tribal governments.
Cost principles for non-profit organizations .....
OMB guidance that conforms with the government-wide common rule (see 60 FR 33036,
June 26, 1995).
OMB Circular A–110.
(c) Chapter II, part 220 .......................................
(d) Chapter II, part 225 ......................................
(e) Chapter II, part 230 ......................................
(f) [Reserved].
[FR Doc. 05–16646 Filed 8–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110–01–P
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
2 CFR Parts 180 and 215
Guidance for Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement)
Office of Management and
Budget.
ACTION: Interim final guidance.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) is updating its
guidance on nonprocurement
debarment and suspension to conform
to the common rule that 33 Federal
agencies published on November 26,
2003. The agencies issued that common
rule after resolving public comments
received in response to a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking. In updating the
guidance, the OMB is making two
improvements to streamline the policy
framework in this area.
First, we are issuing the guidance in
a format that is suitable for Federal
agency adoption. Agency adoption of
the guidance will reduce the volume of
Federal regulations on nonprocurement
debarment and suspension, making it
easier for the affected public to use, and
easier and less expensive for the Federal
Government to maintain.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:51 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
Second, we are publishing the
guidance in the recently established
Title 2 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (2 CFR). Locating it in 2
CFR will make it easier to find. Also, the
OMB guidance will be co-located in the
same title of the CFR as Federal
agencies’ implementing regulations that
adopt the guidance. That is, consistent
with the framework put in place when
OMB established Title 2, each Federal
agency will issue its implementing
regulation in its chapter in Subtitle B of
2 CFR. This notice also makes minor
changes to the previously issued 2 CFR
part 215, to conform that part with the
guidance published today.
DATES: The effective date for this
interim final guidance is September 30,
2005. To be considered in preparation of
the final guidance, comments on the
interim final guidance must be received
by October 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Due to potential delays in
OMB’s receipt and processing of mail
sent through the U.S. Postal Service, we
encourage respondents to submit
comments electronically to ensure
timely receipt. We cannot guarantee that
comments mailed will be received
before the comment closing date.
Electronic mail comments may be
submitted to: ephillip@omb.eop.gov.
Please include ‘‘OMB suspension and
debarment guidance’’ in the subject line
of your e-mail message. Also, please
include the full body of your comments
in the text of the electronic message, as
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
OMB Circular A–21.
OMB Circular A–87.
OMB Circular A–122.
well as in an attachment. Please include
your name, title, organization, postal
address, telephone number, and e-mail
address in the text of the message.
Comments may also be submitted via
facsimile to (202) 395–3952.
Comments may be mailed to Elizabeth
Phillips, Office of Federal Financial
Management, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 6025, New Executive
Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Phillips, Office of Federal
Financial Management, Office of
Management and Budget, telephone
(202) 395–3053 (direct) or (202) 395–
3993 (main office) and e-mail:
ephillip@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. The guidance updated by
this notice originated with Executive
Order (E.O.) 12549, ‘‘Debarment and
Suspension.’’ That Executive order,
issued in 1986, gave government-wide
effect to each agency’s nonprocurement
debarment and suspension actions.
Section 6 of the Executive order
authorized OMB to issue guidance on
nonprocurement debarment and
suspension. Section 3 directed agencies
to issue implementing regulations
consistent with the guidance.
The guidance has been revised twice
since OMB first issued it in 1987 [52 FR
20360]. In 1988, when the agencies
finalized a common rule to implement
OMB’s 1987 guidance, OMB revised its
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
51864
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
guidance [53 FR 19160] to conform with
the agencies’ rule. The second revision
of the OMB guidance occurred in 1995
[60 FR 33036]. That revision conformed
the guidance with the Federal agencies’
update of the common rule to give
reciprocal government-wide effect to
both procurement and nonprocurement
debarment and suspension actions, an
update which implemented E.O. 12689
and section 2455 of the Federal
Acquisition Streamlining Act.
Today’s notice conforms the guidance
with the Federal agencies’ November 26,
2003, update to the common rule [68 FR
66534], but does so in a way that will
greatly improve the relationship
between OMB’s guidance and Federal
agencies’ implementing regulations. In
the recent update, the Federal agencies
recast the common rule in plain
language and made other needed
improvements. OMB did not issue a
notice at that time to amend the
guidance because we were considering
two improvements to the approach we
had used in the past.
Adoptable guidance. The first
improvement to our past approach is to
publish the full text of the OMB
guidance in a form suitable for agency
adoption. The 1988 and 1995 notices
amended the guidance to conform with
updates to the common rule but the
guidance was not published anywhere
in full text as an OMB issuance. Thus,
the full text of policies and procedures
on nonprocurement debarment and
suspension had to appear in each of 33
Federal agencies’ separate codifications
of the common rule. Today’s notice, by
publishing the OMB guidance in a form
that Federal agencies can adopt,
eliminates the need for each agency to
repeat the full text in its own
implementing regulation.
This fundamentally different
approach of adoptable guidance has
three major advantages over the
previous approach of having each
agency codify the full-text of a common
rule. Specifically, the new approach
will:
• Make it easier for recipients of
covered transactions or respondents in
suspension or debarment actions to
discern agency-to-agency variations
from the common rule language. When
agencies published the common rule on
nonprocurement debarment and
suspension, each agency was allowed to
have some agency-specific additions or
exceptions to the government-wide
language. Because each agency’s
variations are embedded in and
integrated with the agency’s publication
of the full-text of the rule, it is difficult
for a recipient or respondent that does
business with multiple Federal agencies
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:51 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
to identify the agency-to-agency
variations in the language. To do so, it
either must locate the original Federal
Register notice in which the agencies
published the common rule or carefully
read and compare the agencies’ separate
codifications of the rule. With the new
approach, however, each agency’s
implementation of the guidelines will
be a brief rule that: (1) Adopts the
guidance, giving it regulatory effect for
that agency’s activities; and (2) states
any agency-specific additions,
clarifications, and exceptions to the
government-wide policies and
procedures contained in the guidance.
• Reduce the volume of Federal
regulations in the CFR. The 33
individual agencies’ separate
codifications of the full text of the
common rule currently require about
750 pages in each paper copy of each
edition of the Code of Federal
Regulations (i.e., about 750,000 pages
for every 1,000 paper copies of the CFR
that are produced). We estimate that the
new approach will reduce this by about
six-fold, which reduces both burdens on
the public and costs of maintaining the
regulations.
• Streamline the process for updating
the government-wide requirements on
nonprocurement debarment and
suspension. The process for updating a
common rule is exceedingly complex
and time consuming. The 33 Federal
agencies must process the same
rulemaking document before it can be
sent to the OMB and published in the
Federal Register, which can create long
delays in updating the rule. With the
new approach, OMB will publish
proposed changes to the guidance in the
Federal Register, with an opportunity
for the public to comment. Once
agencies have issued their regulations
adopting the guidance, the process for
future updates will be complete when
OMB issues the final guidance.
Agencies will not need to amend their
regulations adopting the guidance.
Publication of the guidance in 2 CFR.
The second improvement to our past
approach is to locate the OMB guidance
in Subtitle A of the new Title 2 of the
CFR, ‘‘Grants and Agreements,’’ that
OMB established on May 11, 2004 [69
FR 26276]. Publishing the guidance in
the CFR makes it very accessible to the
affected public and, when agencies
issue their new regulations adopting the
guidance, will co-locate the OMB
guidance in the same CFR title with the
agency rules. We also will maintain a
copy of the current guidance at the OMB
Web site (https://www.whitehouse.gov/
omb/circulars), for the benefit of
individuals who would prefer to access
it there.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Structure and content of the
guidance. Our intent is to issue OMB
guidance that is substantively
unchanged from the common rule
issued by the Federal agencies in
November 2003. We modified some of
the structure and language of the
common rule, however, to create a part
that reads properly as OMB guidance to
agencies rather than an agency
regulation.
The most significant structural change
is in Sections 180.05 to 180.45 of the
document, which precede subpart A.
The primary purpose of these sections is
to provide OMB guidance to Federal
agencies on how to use the guidance in
the remainder of the part. Sections
180.20 through 180.35, for example, tell
Federal agencies that they must issue
regulations to implement the guidance,
identify some required and some
optional content for those regulations,
and specify where and when the
agencies must issue the regulations.
Most of these early sections have no
counterparts in the November 2003
common rule, since it was designed to
be an agency rule rather than OMB
guidance.
Following section 180.45, in subparts
A through I of the part, is the guidance
that an agency would adopt to specify
its policies and procedures for
nonprocurement debarment and
suspension. Several sections in subpart
A of the guidance have different section
numbers than their counterpart sections
in the common rule. The changed
section numbers are due to the
inclusion of the OMB guidance in
sections 180.05 through 180.45, which
displaced and forced renumbering of
sections l.25 to l.75 that preceded
subpart A in the November 2003
common rule.
The only other portion of the
guidance where section numbers vary
from the November 2003 common rule
is subpart I, which contains definitions
of terms. We replaced the defined term
‘‘agency’’ in the common rule with the
term ‘‘Federal agency’’ in the OMB
guidelines, which forced a
reorganization of the definition sections
in subpart I to keep the defined terms
in alphabetical order.
In one section of subpart A, we made
a wording change to clarify the
substance. Section l.135 of the
November 2003 common rule stated that
an agency, given an appropriate cause
for debarment, could take an action to
exclude ‘‘any person who has been
involved, is currently involved, or may
reasonably be expected to be involved
in a covered transaction.’’ The
corresponding language in the OMB
guidelines, which is in section 180.150,
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
is ‘‘any person who has been, is, or may
reasonably be expected to be a
participant or principal in a covered
transaction.’’ The revised language is
intended to be more precise than the
somewhat vague wording of the
common rule.
One language change throughout the
guidelines is use of the term ‘‘Federal
agency’’ where agency responsibilities,
authorities, and procedures are
described. The common rule used the
personal pronoun ‘‘we,’’ which was
appropriate in an agency rule but not in
OMB guidance.
We also dropped the references in
sections 180.530 and 180.945 of the
guidance (which had the same section
numbers in the common rule) to the
paper version of the list of excluded
parties maintained by the General
Services Administration (GSA). Section
l.530 of the November 2003 common
rule stated that Federal agencies
anticipated that the paper version of the
list would be discontinued. The paper
version no longer is available, so we
deleted the references to it.
Other minor wording changes
throughout subparts A through I are to
make the document read properly as
OMB guidance. We have posted a
source and destination table at the OMB
Web site that shows which section in
the OMB guidance corresponds to each
section in the common rule and
summarizes the more significant
changes, none of which we believe to be
substantive change.
Invitation to comment. Our intent is
to preserve in the OMB guidance the
substantive content of the November
2003 common rule. Given that the
agencies published the final common
rule after an opportunity for public
comment, we are publishing these
guidelines as interim final guidelines,
rather than proposing the substance for
comment again. For future updates to
this guidance, we will propose
substantive changes with an
opportunity for public comment, in
accordance with § 180.40 of the
guidance. In soliciting comments on the
interim final guidance, we are not
seeking to revisit substantive issues
raised by those earlier comments and
resolved by the agencies during
preparation of their final rule. However,
we invite comments on any unintended
changes we have made in the guidance
relative to the November 2003 common
rule.
Next steps. We will finalize the
guidance after resolving any comments
received on the interim final version
published in this notice. Each Federal
agency that is a signatory to the
common rule on nonprocurement
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:51 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
debarment and suspension will: (1)
Establish its chapter in Subtitle B of 2
CFR, consistent with the structure
established for that title; (2) issue in that
chapter of 2 CFR its brief rule adopting
the OMB guidance and stating any
additions, clarifications, or exceptions
to the policies and procedures
contained in the guidance; and (3)
remove the November 2003 common
rule from its own CFR title. We expect
to complete the process in calendar year
2006.
Conforming 2 CFR part 215 (OMB
Circular A–110). We also are making the
following two changes to 2 CFR part
215, in order to conform the OMB
guidance in that part with the guidance
on nonprocurement debarment and
suspension:
• We dropped the reference in
§ 215.13 to the common rule on
nonprocurement debarment and
suspension, in anticipation of agencies
adoption of the guidance and removal of
the common rule from their titles in the
CFR.
• We revised Paragraph 8 in
Appendix A to 2 CFR part 215, to
correct: (1) The name of the Excluded
Parties List System; and (2) the
threshold for coverage of procurement
contracts awarded by recipients of
Federal financial assistance awards.
List of Subjects
2 CFR Part 180
Administrative practice and
procedure, Grant programs, Loan
programs, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
2 CFR Part 215
Accounting, Colleges and
Universities, Grant programs, Hospitals,
Nonprofit organizations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 8, 2005.
Joshua B. Bolten,
Director.
For the reasons set forth above, the
Office of Management and Budget
amends 2 CFR, Subtitle A, as follows:
I
Chapter I—Office of Management and
Budget Governmentwide Guidance for
Grants and Agreements
1. A heading is added to chapter I to
read as set forth above.
I 2. Part 180 is added to Chapter I, to
read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
PART 180—OMB GUIDELINES TO
AGENCIES ON GOVERNMENTWIDE
DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
(NONPROCUREMENT)
Sec.
180.5 What does this part do?
180.10 How is this part organized?
180.15 To whom do these guidelines apply?
180.20 What must a Federal agency do to
implement these guidelines?
180.25 What must a Federal agency address
in its implementation of these
guidelines?
180.30 Where does a Federal agency
implement these guidelines?
180.35 By when must a Federal agency
implement these guidelines?
180.40 How are these guidelines
maintained?
180.45 Do these guidelines cover persons
who are disqualified, as well as those
who are excluded from nonprocurement
transactions?
Subpart A—General
180.100 How are subparts A through I
organized?
180.105 How is this part written?
180.110 Do terms in this part have special
meanings?
180.115 What do subparts A through I of
this part do?
180.120 Do subparts A through I of this part
apply to me?
180.125 What is the purpose of the
nonprocurement debarment and
suspension system?
180.130 How does an exclusion restrict a
person’s involvement in covered
transactions?
180.135 May a Federal agency grant an
exception to let an excluded person
participate in a covered transaction?
180.140 Does an exclusion under the
nonprocurement system affect a person’s
eligibility for Federal procurement
contracts?
180.145 Does an exclusion under the
Federal procurement system affect a
person’s eligibility to participate in
nonprocurement transactions?
180.150 Against whom may a Federal
agency take an exclusion action?
180.155 How do I know if a person is
excluded?
Subpart B—Covered Transactions
Authority and Issuance
I
51865
180.200 What is a covered transaction?
180.205 Why is it important to know if a
particular transaction is a covered
transaction?
180.210 Which nonprocurement
transactions are covered transactions?
180.215 Which nonprocurement
transactions are not covered
transactions?
180.220 Are any procurement contracts
included as covered transactions?
180.225 How do I know if a transaction in
which I may participate is a covered
transaction?
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
51866
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart C—Responsibilities of Participants
Regarding Transactions Doing Business With
Other Persons
180.300 What must I do before I enter into
a covered transaction with another
person at the next lower tier?
180.305 May I enter into a covered
transaction with an excluded or
disqualified person?
180.310 What must I do if a Federal agency
excludes a person with whom I am
already doing business in a covered
transaction?
180.315 May I use the services of an
excluded person as a principal under a
covered transaction?
180.320 Must I verify that principals of my
covered transactions are eligible to
participate?
180.325 What happens if I do business with
an excluded person in a covered
transaction?
180.330 What requirements must I pass
down to persons at lower tiers with
whom I intend to do business?
Disclosing Information—Primary Tier
Participants
180.335 What information must I provide
before entering into a covered
transaction with a Federal agency?
180.340 If I disclose unfavorable
information required under § 180.335
will I be prevented from participating in
the transaction?
180.345 What happens if I fail to disclose
information required under § 180.335?
180.350 What must I do if I learn of
information required under § 180.335
after entering into a covered transaction
with a Federal agency?
Disclosing Information—Lower Tier
Participants
180.355 What information must I provide to
a higher tier participant before entering
into a covered transaction with that
participant?
180.360 What happens if I fail to disclose
information required under § 180.355?
180.365 What must I do if I learn of
information required under § 180.355
after entering into a covered transaction
with a higher tier participant?
Subpart D—Responsibilities of Federal
Agency Officials Regarding Transactions
180.400 May I enter into a transaction with
an excluded or disqualified person?
180.405 May I enter into a covered
transaction with a participant if a
principal of the transaction is excluded?
180.410 May I approve a participant’s use
of the services of an excluded person?
180.415 What must I do if a Federal agency
excludes the participant or a principal
after I enter into a covered transaction?
180.420 May I approve a transaction with
an excluded or disqualified person at a
lower tier?
180.425 When do I check to see if a person
is excluded or disqualified?
180.430 How do I check to see if a person
is excluded or disqualified?
180.435 What must I require of a primary
tier participant?
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:51 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
180.440 What action may I take if a primary
tier participant knowingly does business
with an excluded or disqualified person?
180.445 What action may I take if a primary
tier participant fails to disclose the
information required under § 180.335?
180.450 What may I do if a lower tier
participant fails to disclose the
information required under § 180.355 to
the next higher tier?
Subpart E—Excluded Parties List System
180.500 What is the purpose of the
Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)?
180.505 Who uses the EPLS?
180.510 Who maintains the EPLS?
180.515 What specific information is in the
EPLS?
180.520 Who places the information into
the EPLS?
180.525 Whom do I ask if I have questions
about a person in the EPLS?
180.530 Where can I find the EPLS?
Subpart F—General Principles Relating to
Suspension and Debarment Actions
180.600 How do suspension and debarment
actions start?
180.605 How does suspension differ from
debarment?
180.610 What procedures does a Federal
agency use in suspension and debarment
actions?
180.615 How does a Federal agency notify
a person of a suspension or debarment
action?
180.620 Do Federal agencies coordinate
suspension and debarment actions?
180.625 What is the scope of a suspension
or debarment?
180.630 May a Federal agency impute the
conduct of one person to another?
180.635 May a Federal agency settle a
debarment or suspension action?
180.640 May a settlement include a
voluntary exclusion?
180.645 Do other Federal agencies know if
an agency agrees to a voluntary
exclusion?
Subpart G—Suspension
180.700 When may the suspending official
issue a suspension?
180.705 What does the suspending official
consider in issuing a suspension?
180.710 When does a suspension take
effect?
180.715 What notice does the suspending
official give me if I am suspended?
180.720 How may I contest a suspension?
180.725 How much time do I have to
contest a suspension?
180.730 What information must I provide to
the suspending official if I contest the
suspension?
180.735 Under what conditions do I get an
additional opportunity to challenge the
facts on which the suspension is based?
180.740 Are suspension proceedings
formal?
180.745 How is fact-finding conducted?
180.750 What does the suspending official
consider in deciding whether to continue
or terminate my suspension?
180.755 When will I know whether the
suspension is continued or terminated?
180.760 How long may my suspension last?
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Subpart H—Debarment
180.800 What are the causes for debarment?
180.805 What notice does the debarring
official give me if I am proposed for
debarment?
180.810 When does a debarment take
effect?
180.815 How may I contest a proposed
debarment?
180.820 How much time do I have to
contest a proposed debarment?
180.825 What information must I provide to
the debarring official if I contest the
proposed debarment?
180.830 Under what conditions do I get an
additional opportunity to challenge the
facts on which the proposed debarment
is based?
180.835 Are debarment proceedings formal?
180.840 How is fact-finding conducted?
180.845 What does the debarring official
consider in deciding whether to debar
me?
180.850 What is the standard of proof in a
debarment action?
180.855 Who has the burden of proof in a
debarment action?
180.860 What factors may influence the
debarring official’s decision?
180.865 How long may my debarment last?
180.870 When do I know if the debarring
official debars me?
180.875 May I ask the debarring official to
reconsider a decision to debar me?
180.880 What factors may influence the
debarring official during
reconsideration?
180.885 May the debarring official extend a
debarment?
Subpart I—Definitions
180.900 Adequate evidence.
180.905 Affiliate.
180.910 Agent or representative.
180.915 Civil judgment.
180.920 Conviction.
180.925 Debarment.
180.930 Debarring official.
180.935 Disqualified.
180.940 Excluded or exclusion.
180.945 Excluded Parties List System
(EPLS).
180.950 Federal agency.
180.955 Indictment.
180.960 Ineligible or ineligibility.
180.965 Legal proceedings.
180.970 Nonprocurement transaction.
180.975 Notice.
180.980 Participant.
180.985 Person.
180.990 Preponderance of the evidence.
180.995 Principal.
180.1000 Respondent.
180.1005 State.
180.1010 Suspending official.
180.1015 Suspension.
180.1020 Voluntary exclusion or
voluntarily excluded.
Appendix to Part 180—Covered Transactions
Authority: Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103–355, 108
Stat. 3327; E.O. 12549, 3 CFR, 1986 Comp.,
p.189; E.O. 12689, 3 CFR, 1989 Comp., p.
235.
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
§ 180.5
What does this part do?
This part provides Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
guidance for Federal agencies on the
governmentwide debarment and
suspension system for nonprocurement
programs and activities.
§ 180.10
How is this part organized?
This part is organized in two
segments.
(a) Sections 180.5 through 180.45
contain general policy direction for
Federal agencies’ use of the standards in
subparts A through I of this part.
(b) Subparts A through I of this part
contain uniform governmentwide
standards that Federal agencies are to
use to specify—
(1) The types of transactions that are
covered by the nonprocurement
debarment and suspension system;
(2) The effects of an exclusion under
that nonprocurement system, including
reciprocal effects with the
governmentwide debarment and
suspension system for procurement;
(3) The criteria and minimum due
process to be used in nonprocurement
debarment and suspension actions; and
(4) Related policies and procedures to
ensure the effectiveness of those actions.
§ 180.15
apply?
To whom does the guidance
The guidance provides OMB guidance
only to Federal agencies. Publication of
the guidance in the CFR does not
change its nature—it is guidance and
not regulation. Federal agencies’
implementation of the guidance governs
the rights and responsibilities of other
persons affected by the nonprocurement
debarment and suspension system.
§ 180.20 What must a Federal agency do to
implement these guidelines?
As required by Section 3 of E.O.
12549, each Federal agency with
nonprocurement programs and activities
covered by subparts A through I of the
guidance must issue regulations
consistent with those subparts.
§ 180.25 What must a Federal agency
address in its implementation of the
guidance?
Each Federal agency implementing
regulation:
(a) Must establish policies and
procedures for that agency’s
nonprocurement debarment and
suspension programs and activities that
are consistent with the guidance. When
adopted by a Federal agency, the
provisions of the guidance has
regulatory effect for that agency’s
programs and activities.
(b) Must address some matters for
which these guidelines give each
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:51 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
Federal agency some discretion.
Specifically, the regulation must—
(1) Identify either the Federal agency
head or the title of the designated
official who is authorized to grant
exceptions under § 180.135 to let an
excluded person participate in a
covered transaction.
(2) State whether the agency includes
as covered transactions an additional
tier of contracts awarded under covered
nonprocurement transactions, as
permitted under § 180.220(c).
(3) Identify the method(s) an agency
official may use, when entering into a
covered transaction with a primary tier
participant, to communicate to the
participant the requirements described
in § 180.435. Examples of methods are
an award term that requires compliance
as a condition of the award; an
assurance of compliance obtained at
time of application; or a certification.
(4) State whether the Federal agency’s
policy is to restrict participants’
collection of certifications to verify that
lower-tier participants are not excluded
or disqualified (see § 180.300(b)). If it is
the policy, the regulation needs to
require agency officials, when entering
into covered transactions with primary
tier participants, to communicate that
policy.
(5) State whether the Federal agency
specifies a particular method that
participants must use to communicate
compliance requirements to lower-tier
participants, as described in
§ 180.330(a). If there is a specified
method, the regulation needs to require
agency officials, when entering into
covered transactions with primary tier
participants, to communicate that
requirement.
(c) May also, at the agency’s option:
(1) Identify any specific types of
transactions that the Federal agency
includes as ‘‘nonprocurement
transactions’’ in addition to the
examples provided in § 180.970.
(2) Identify any types of
nonprocurement transactions that the
Federal agency exempts from coverage
under these guidelines, as authorized
under § 180.330(g)(2).
(3) Identify specific examples of types
of individuals who would be
‘‘principals’’ under the Federal agency’s
nonprocurement programs and
transactions, in addition to the types of
individuals described at § 180.995.
(4) Specify the Federal agency’s
procedures, if any, by which a
respondent may appeal a suspension or
debarment decision.
(5) Identify by title the officials
designated by the Federal agency head
as debarring officials under § 180.930 or
suspending officials under § 180.1010.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
51867
(6) Include a subpart covering
disqualifications, as authorized in
§ 180.45.
§ 180.30 Where does a Federal agency
implement these guidelines?
Each Federal agency that participates
in the governmentwide nonprocurement
debarment and suspension system must
issue a regulation implementing these
guidelines within its chapter in subtitle
B of this title of the Code of Federal
Regulations.
§ 180.35 By when must a Federal agency
implement these guidelines?
Federal agencies must submit
proposed regulations to the OMB for
review within nine months of the
issuance of these guidelines and issue
final regulations within eighteen
months of these guidelines.
§ 180.40 How are these guidelines
maintained?
The Interagency Committee on
Debarment and Suspension established
by section 4 of E.O. 12549 recommends
to the OMB any needed revisions to the
guidelines in this part. The OMB
publishes proposed changes to the
guidelines in the Federal Register for
public comment, considers comments
with the help of the Interagency
Committee on Debarment and
Suspension, and issues the final
guidelines.
§ 180.45 Do these guidelines cover
persons who are disqualified, as well as
those who are excluded from
nonprocurement transactions?
A Federal agency may add a subpart
covering disqualifications to its
regulation implementing these
guidelines, but the guidelines in
subparts A through I of this part—
(a) Address disqualified persons only
to—
(1) Provide for their inclusion in the
EPLS; and
(2) State responsibilities of Federal
agencies and participants to check for
disqualified persons before entering into
covered transactions.
(b) Do not specify the—
(1) Transactions for which a
disqualified person is ineligible. Those
transactions vary on a case-by-case
basis, because they depend on the
language of the specific statute,
Executive order or regulation that
caused the disqualification;
(2) Entities to which a disqualification
applies; or
(3) Process that a Federal agency uses
to disqualify a person. Unlike exclusion
under subparts A through I of this part,
disqualification is frequently not a
discretionary action that a Federal
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
51868
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
agency takes, and may include special
procedures.
Subpart A—General
§ 180.100 How are subparts A through I
organized?
audience with special responsibilities,
as shown in the following table:
(a) Each subpart contains information
related to a broad topic or specific
In subpart . . .
You will find provisions related to . . .
A ...................................
B ...................................
general information about Subparts A through I of this part.
the types of transactions that are covered by the Governmentwide nonprocurement suspension and debarment system.
the responsibilities of persons who participate in covered transactions.
the responsibilities of Federal agency officials who are authorized to enter into covered transactions.
the responsibilities of Federal agencies for entering information into the EPLS
the general principles governing suspension, debarment, voluntary exclusion and settlement.
suspension actions.
debarment actions.
definitions of terms used in this part.
C ...................................
D ...................................
E ...................................
F ....................................
G ...................................
H ...................................
I .....................................
(b) The following table shows which
subparts may be of special interest to
you, depending on who you are:
If you are . . .
See Subpart(s) . . .
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
A,
A,
A,
A,
A,
A,
a participant or principal in a nonprocurement transaction ........................................................................................
a respondent in a suspension action ..........................................................................................................................
a respondent in a debarment action ...........................................................................................................................
a suspending official ....................................................................................................................................................
a debarring official .......................................................................................................................................................
an Federal agency official authorized to enter into a covered transaction ................................................................
§ 180.105
How is this part written?
(a) This part uses a ‘‘plain language’’
format to make it easier for the general
public and business community to use.
The section headings and text, often in
the form of questions and answers, must
be read together.
(b) Pronouns used within this part,
such as ‘‘I’’ and ‘‘you,’’ change from
subpart to subpart depending on the
audience being addressed.
(c) The ‘‘Covered Transactions’’
diagram in the appendix to this part
shows the levels or ‘‘tiers’’ at which a
Federal agency may enforce an
exclusion.
§ 180.110 Do terms in this part have
special meanings?
This part uses terms throughout the
text that have special meaning. Those
terms are defined in subpart I of this
part. For example, three important terms
are—
(a) Exclusion or excluded, which
refers only to discretionary actions
taken by a suspending or debarring
official under Executive Order 12549
and Executive Order 12689 or under the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR
part 9, subpart 9.4);
(b) Disqualification or disqualified,
which refers to prohibitions under
specific statutes, executive orders (other
than Executive Order 12549 and
VerDate Aug<18>2005
20:55 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
Executive Order 12689), or other
authorities. Disqualifications frequently
are not subject to the discretion of a
Federal agency official, may have a
different scope than exclusions, or have
special conditions that apply to the
disqualification; and
(c) Ineligibility or ineligible, which
generally refers to a person who is either
excluded or disqualified.
§ 180.115 What do Subparts A through I of
this part do?
Subparts A through I of this part
provide for reciprocal exclusion of
persons who have been excluded under
the Federal Acquisition Regulation, and
provide for the consolidated listing of
all persons who are excluded, or
disqualified by statute, executive order
or other legal authority.
§ 180.120 Do subparts A through I of this
part apply to me?
Portions of subparts A through I of
this part (see table at § 180.100(b)) apply
to you if you are a—
(a) Person who has been, is, or may
reasonably be expected to be, a
participant or principal in a covered
transaction;
(b) Respondent (a person against
whom a Federal agency has initiated a
debarment or suspension action);
(c) Federal agency debarring or
suspending official; or
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
B,
B,
B,
B,
B,
B,
C and I.
F, G and I.
F, H and I.
E, F, G and I.
D, F, H and I.
D, E and I.
(d) Federal agency official who is
authorized to enter into covered
transactions with non-Federal parties.
§ 180.125 What is the purpose of the
nonprocurement debarment and
suspension system?
(a) To protect the public interest, the
Federal Government ensures the
integrity of Federal programs by
conducting business only with
responsible persons.
(b) A Federal agency uses the
nonprocurement debarment and
suspension system to exclude from
Federal programs persons who are not
presently responsible.
(c) An exclusion is a serious action
that a Federal agency may take only to
protect the public interest. A Federal
agency may not exclude a person or
commodity for the purposes of
punishment.
§ 180.130 How does an exclusion restrict a
person’s involvement in covered
transactions?
With the exceptions stated in
§§ 180.135, 315, and 420, a person who
is excluded by any Federal agency may
not:
(a) Be a participant in a Federal
agency transaction that is a covered
transaction; or
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Act as a principal of a person
participating in one of those covered
transactions.
Subpart B—Covered Transactions
§ 180.200
§ 180.135 May a Federal agency grant an
exception to let an excluded person
participate in a covered transaction?
(a) A Federal agency head or designee
may grant an exception permitting an
excluded person to participate in a
particular covered transaction. If the
agency head or designee grants an
exception, the exception must be in
writing and state the reason(s) for
deviating from the governmentwide
policy in Executive Order 12549.
(b) An exception granted by one
Federal agency for an excluded person
does not extend to the covered
transactions of another Federal agency.
§ 180.140 Does an exclusion under the
nonprocurement system affect a person’s
eligibility for Federal procurement
contracts?
If any Federal agency excludes a
person under Executive Order 12549 or
Executive Order 12689, on or after
August 25, 1995, the excluded person is
also ineligible for Federal procurement
transactions under the FAR. Therefore,
an exclusion under this part has
reciprocal effect in Federal procurement
transactions.
§ 180.145 Does an exclusion under the
Federal procurement system affect a
person’s eligibility to participate in
nonprocurement transactions?
If any Federal agency excludes a
person under the FAR on or after
August 25, 1995, the excluded person is
also ineligible to participate in Federal
agencies’ nonprocurement covered
transactions. Therefore, an exclusion
under the FAR has reciprocal effect in
Federal nonprocurement transactions.
§ 180.150 Against whom may a Federal
agency take an exclusion action?
Given a cause that justifies an
exclusion under this part, a Federal
agency may exclude any person who
has been, is, or may reasonably be
expected to be a participant or principal
in a covered transaction.
Check the Governmentwide Excluded
Parties List System (EPLS) to determine
whether a person is excluded. The
General Services Administration (GSA)
maintains the EPLS and makes it
available, as detailed in Subpart E of
this part. When a Federal agency takes
an action to exclude a person under the
nonprocurement or procurement
debarment and suspension system, the
agency enters the information about the
excluded person into the EPLS.
16:43 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
§ 180.205 Why is it important if a particular
transaction is a covered transaction?
The importance of whether a
transaction is a covered transaction
depends upon who you are.
(a) As a participant in the transaction,
you have the responsibilities laid out in
subpart C of this part. Those include
responsibilities to the person or Federal
agency at the next higher tier from
whom you received the transaction, if
any. They also include responsibilities
if you subsequently enter into other
covered transactions with persons at the
next lower tier.
(b) As a Federal official who enters
into a primary tier transaction, you have
the responsibilities laid out in subpart D
of this part.
(c) As an excluded person, you may
not be a participant or principal in the
transaction unless—
(1) The person who entered into the
transaction with you allows you to
continue your involvement in a
transaction that predates your
exclusion, as permitted under § 180.310
or § 180.415; or
(2) A Federal agency official obtains
an exception from the agency head or
designee to allow you to be involved in
the transaction, as permitted under
§ 180.135.
§ 180.210 Which nonprocurement
transactions are covered transactions?
All nonprocurement transactions, as
defined in § 180.970, are covered
transactions unless listed in the
exemptions under § 180.215.
§ 180.215 Which nonprocurement
transactions are not covered transactions?
§ 180.155 How do I know if a person is
excluded?
VerDate Aug<18>2005
What is a covered transaction?
A covered transaction is a
nonprocurement or procurement
transaction that is subject to the
prohibitions of this part. It may be a
transaction at—
(a) The primary tier, between a
Federal agency and a person (see
appendix to this part); or
(b) A lower tier, between a participant
in a covered transaction and another
person.
The following types of
nonprocurement transactions are not
covered transactions:
(a) A direct award to—
(1) A foreign government or foreign
governmental entity;
(2) A public international
organization;
(3) An entity owned (in whole or in
part) or controlled by a foreign
government; or
(4) Any other entity consisting wholly
or partially of one or more foreign
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
51869
governments or foreign governmental
entities.
(b) A benefit to an individual as a
personal entitlement without regard to
the individual’s present responsibility
(but benefits received in an individual’s
business capacity are not excepted). For
example, if a person receives social
security benefits under the
Supplemental Security Income
provisions of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. 1301 et seq., those benefits are
not covered transactions and, therefore,
are not affected if the person is
excluded.
(c) Federal employment.
(d) A transaction that a Federal
agency needs to respond to a national or
agency-recognized emergency or
disaster.
(e) A permit, license, certificate or
similar instrument issued as a means to
regulate public health, safety or the
environment, unless a Federal agency
specifically designates it to be a covered
transaction.
(f) An incidental benefit that results
from ordinary governmental operations.
(g) Any other transaction if—
(1) The application of an exclusion to
the transaction is prohibited by law; or
(2) A Federal agency’s regulation
exempts it from coverage under this
part.
§ 180.220 Are any procurement contracts
included as covered transactions?
(a) Covered transactions under this
part—
(1) Do not include any procurement
contracts awarded directly by a Federal
agency; but
(2) Do include some procurement
contracts awarded by non-Federal
participants in nonprocurement covered
transactions.
(b) Specifically, a contract for goods
or services is a covered transaction if
any of the following applies:
(1) The contract is awarded by a
participant in a nonprocurement
transaction that is covered under
§ 180.210, and the amount of the
contract is expected to equal or exceed
$25,000.
(2) The contract requires the consent
of an official of a Federal agency. In that
case, the contract, regardless of the
amount, always is a covered transaction,
and it does not matter who awarded it.
For example, it could be a subcontract
awarded by a contractor at a tier below
a nonprocurement transaction, as shown
in the appendix to this part.
(3) The contract is for Federallyrequired audit services.
(c) A subcontract also is a covered
transaction if,—
(1) It is awarded by a participant in a
procurement transaction under a
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
51870
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
nonprocurement transaction of a
Federal agency that extends the
coverage of paragraph (b)(1) of this
section to any additional tier of
contracts (see the diagram in the
appendix to this part showing that
optional lower tier coverage); and
(2) The value of the subcontract
exceeds or is expected to exceed
$25,000.
terminate and the type of termination
action, if any, only after a thorough
review to ensure that the action is
proper and appropriate.
(b) You may not renew or extend
covered transactions (other than no-cost
time extensions) with any excluded
person, unless the Federal agency
responsible for the transaction grants an
exception under § 180.135.
§ 180.225 How do I know if a transaction
in which I may participate is a covered
transaction?
§ 180.315 May I use the services of an
excluded person as a principal under a
covered transaction?
As a participant in a transaction, you
will know that it is a covered
transaction because the Federal agency
regulations governing the transaction,
the appropriate Federal agency official
or participant at the next higher tier
who enters into the transaction with
you, will tell you that you must comply
with applicable portions of this part.
(a) You as a participant may continue
to use the services of an excluded
person as a principal under a covered
transaction if you were using the
services of that person in the transaction
before the person was excluded.
However, you are not required to
continue using that person’s services as
a principal. You should make a decision
about whether to discontinue that
person’s services only after a thorough
review to ensure that the action is
proper and appropriate.
(b) You may not begin to use the
services of an excluded person as a
principal under a covered transaction
unless the Federal agency responsible
for the transaction grants an exception
under § 180.135.
Subpart C—Responsibilities of
Participants Regarding Transactions
Doing Business With Other Persons
§ 180.300 What must I do before I enter
into a covered transaction with another
person at the next lower tier?
When you enter into a covered
transaction with another person at the
next lower tier, you must verify that the
person with whom you intend to do
business is not excluded or disqualified.
You do this by:
(a) Checking the EPLS; or
(b) Collecting a certification from that
person if allowed by the Federal agency
responsible for the transaction; or
(c) Adding a clause or condition to the
covered transaction with that person.
§ 180.305 May I enter into a covered
transaction with an excluded or disqualified
person?
(a) You as a participant may not enter
into a covered transaction with an
excluded person, unless the Federal
agency responsible for the transaction
grants an exception under § 180.135.
(b) You may not enter into any
transaction with a person who is
disqualified from that transaction,
unless you have obtained an exception
under the disqualifying statute,
Executive order, or regulation.
§ 180.310 What must I do if a Federal
agency excludes a person with whom I am
already doing business in a covered
transaction?
(a) You as a participant may continue
covered transactions with an excluded
person if the transactions were in
existence when the agency excluded the
person. However, you are not required
to continue the transactions, and you
may consider termination. You should
make a decision about whether to
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:43 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
§ 180.320 Must I verify that principals of
my covered transactions are eligible to
participate?
Yes, you as a participant are
responsible for determining whether
any of your principals of your covered
transactions is excluded or disqualified
from participating in the transaction.
You may decide the method and
frequency by which you do so. You
may, but you are not required to, check
the EPLS.
§ 180.325 What happens if I do business
with an excluded person in a covered
transaction?
If as a participant you knowingly do
business with an excluded person, the
Federal agency responsible for your
transaction may disallow costs, annul or
terminate the transaction, issue a stop
work order, debar or suspend you, or
take other remedies as appropriate.
§ 180.330 What requirements must I pass
down to persons at lower tiers with whom
I intend to do business?
Before entering into a covered
transaction with a participant at the
next lower tier, you must require that
participant to—
(a) Comply with this subpart as a
condition of participation in the
transaction. You may do so using any
method(s), unless the regulation of the
Federal agency responsible for the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
transaction requires you to use specific
methods.
(b) Pass the requirement to comply
with this subpart to each person with
whom the participant enters into a
covered transaction at the next lower
tier.
Disclosing Information—Primary Tier
Participants
§ 180.335 What information must I provide
before entering into a covered transaction
with a Federal agency?
Before you enter into a covered
transaction at the primary tier, you as
the participant must notify the Federal
agency office that is entering into the
transaction with you, if you know that
you or any of the principals for that
covered transaction:
(a) Are presently excluded or
disqualified;
(b) Have been convicted within the
preceding three years of any of the
offenses listed in § 180.800(a) or had a
civil judgment rendered against you for
one of those offenses within that time
period;
(c) Are presently indicted for or
otherwise criminally or civilly charged
by a governmental entity (Federal, State
or local) with commission of any of the
offenses listed in § 180.800(a); or
(d) Have had one or more public
transactions (Federal, State, or local)
terminated within the preceding three
years for cause or default.
§ 180.340 If I disclose unfavorable
information required under § 180.335, will I
be prevented from participating in the
transaction?
As a primary tier participant, your
disclosure of unfavorable information
about yourself or a principal under
§ 180.335 will not necessarily cause a
Federal agency to deny your
participation in the covered transaction.
The agency will consider the
information when it determines whether
to enter into the covered transaction.
The agency will also consider any
additional information or explanation
that you elect to submit with the
disclosed information.
§ 180.345 What happens if I fail to disclose
information required under § 180.335?
If a Federal agency later determines
that you failed to disclose information
under § 180.335 that you knew at the
time you entered into the covered
transaction, the agency may—
(a) Terminate the transaction for
material failure to comply with the
terms and conditions of the transaction;
or
(b) Pursue any other available
remedies, including suspension and
debarment.
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
§ 180.350 What must I do if I learn of
information required under § 180.335 after
entering into a covered transaction with a
Federal agency?
At any time after you enter into a
covered transaction, you must give
immediate written notice to the Federal
agency office with which you entered
into the transaction if you learn either
that—
(a) You failed to disclose information
earlier, as required by § 180.335; or
(b) Due to changed circumstances,
you or any of the principals for the
transaction now meet any of the criteria
in § 180.335.
§ 180.355 What information must I provide
to a higher tier participant before entering
into a covered transaction with that
participant?
Before you enter into a covered
transaction with a person at the next
higher tier, you as a lower tier
participant must notify that person if
you know that you or any of the
principals are presently excluded or
disqualified.
If a Federal agency later determines
that you failed to tell the person at the
higher tier that you were excluded or
disqualified at the time you entered into
the covered transaction with that
person, the agency may pursue any
available remedies, including
suspension and debarment.
§ 180.365 What must I do if I learn of
information required under § 180.355 after
entering into a covered transaction with a
higher tier participant?
At any time after you enter into a
lower tier covered transaction with a
person at a higher tier, you must
provide immediate written notice to that
person if you learn either that—
(a) You failed to disclose information
earlier, as required by § 180.355; or
(b) Due to changed circumstances,
you or any of the principals for the
transaction now meet any of the criteria
in § 180.355.
Subpart D—Responsibilities of Federal
Agency Officials Regarding
Transactions
§ 180.400 May I enter into a transaction
with an excluded or disqualified person?
(a) You as a Federal agency official
may not enter into a covered transaction
with an excluded person unless you
obtain an exception under § 180.135.
(b) You may not enter into any
transaction with a person who is
Jkt 205001
As a Federal agency official, you may
not enter into a covered transaction with
a participant if you know that a
principal of the transaction is excluded,
unless you obtain an exception under
§ 180.135.
After entering into a covered
transaction with a participant, you as a
Federal agency official may not approve
a participant’s use of an excluded
person as a principal under that
transaction, unless you obtain an
exception under § 180.135.
§ 180.415 What must I do if a Federal
agency excludes the participant or a
principal after I enter into a covered
transaction?
§ 180.360 What happens if I fail to disclose
information required under § 180.355?
16:43 Aug 30, 2005
§ 180.405 May I enter into a covered
transaction with a participant if a principal
of the transaction is excluded?
§ 180.410 May I approve a participant’s
use of the services of an excluded person?
Disclosing Information—Lower Tier
Participants
VerDate Aug<18>2005
disqualified from that transaction,
unless you obtain a waiver or exception
under the statute, Executive order, or
regulation that is the basis for the
person’s disqualification.
(a) You as a Federal agency official
may continue covered transactions with
an excluded person, or under which an
excluded person is a principal, if the
transactions were in existence when the
person was excluded. You are not
required to continue the transactions,
however, and you may consider
termination. You should make a
decision about whether to terminate and
the type of termination action, if any,
only after a thorough review to ensure
that the action is proper.
(b) You may not renew or extend
covered transactions (other than no-cost
time extensions) with any excluded
person, or under which an excluded
person is a principal, unless you obtain
an exception under § 180.135.
§ 180.420 May I approve a transaction with
an excluded or disqualified person at a
lower tier?
If a transaction at a lower tier is
subject to your approval, you as a
Federal agency official may not
approve—
(a) A covered transaction with a
person who is currently excluded,
unless you obtain an exception under
§ 180.135; or
(b) A transaction with a person who
is disqualified from that transaction,
unless you obtain a waiver or exception
under the statute, Executive order, or
regulation that is the basis for the
person’s disqualification.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
51871
§ 180.425 When do I check to see if a
person is excluded or disqualified?
As a Federal agency official, you must
check to see if a person is excluded or
disqualified before you—
(a) Enter into a primary tier covered
transaction;
(b) Approve a principal in a primary
tier covered transaction;
(c) Approve a lower tier participant if
your agency’s approval of the lower tier
participant is required; or
(d) Approve a principal in connection
with a lower tier transaction if your
agency’s approval of the principal is
required.
§ 180.430 How do I check to see if a
person is excluded or disqualified?
You check to see if a person is
excluded or disqualified in two ways:
(a) You as a Federal agency official
must check the EPLS when you take any
action listed in § 180.425.
(b) You must review information that
a participant gives you, as required by
§ 180.335, about its status or the status
of the principals of a transaction.
§ 180.435 What must I require of a primary
tier participant?
You as a Federal agency official must
require each participant in a primary
tier covered transaction to—
(a) Comply with subpart C of this part
as a condition of participation in the
transaction; and
(b) Communicate the requirement to
comply with Subpart C of this part to
persons at the next lower tier with
whom the primary tier participant
enters into covered transactions.
§ 180.440 What action may I take if a
primary tier participant knowingly does
business with an excluded or disqualified
person?
If a participant knowingly does
business with an excluded or
disqualified person, you as a Federal
agency official may refer the matter for
suspension and debarment
consideration. You may also disallow
costs, annul or terminate the
transaction, issue a stop work order, or
take any other appropriate remedy.
§ 180.445 What action may I take if a
primary tier participant fails to disclose the
information required under § 180.335?
If you as a Federal agency official
determine that a participant failed to
disclose information, as required by
§ 180.335, at the time it entered into a
covered transaction with you, you
may—
(a) Terminate the transaction for
material failure to comply with the
terms and conditions of the transaction;
or
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
51872
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Pursue any other available
remedies, including suspension and
debarment.
debarment and suspension system, the
agency enters the information about the
excluded person into the EPLS.
§ 180.450 What action may I take if a lower
tier participant fails to disclose the
information required under § 180.355 to the
next higher tier?
§ 180.515 What specific information is in
the EPLS?
If you as a Federal agency official
determine that a lower tier participant
failed to disclose information, as
required by § 180.355, at the time it
entered into a covered transaction with
a participant at the next higher tier, you
may pursue any remedies available to
you, including the initiation of a
suspension or debarment action.
Subpart E—Excluded Parties List
System
§ 180.500 What is the purpose of the
Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)?
The EPLS is a widely available source
of the most current information about
persons who are excluded or
disqualified from covered transactions.
§ 180.505
Who uses the EPLS?
(a) Federal agency officials use the
EPLS to determine whether to enter into
a transaction with a person, as required
under § 180.430.
(b) Participants also may, but are not
required to, use the EPLS to determine
if—
(1) Principals of their transactions are
excluded or disqualified, as required
under § 180.320; or
(2) Persons with whom they are
entering into covered transactions at the
next lower tier are excluded or
disqualified.
(c) The EPLS is available to the
general public.
§ 180.510
Who maintains the EPLS?
The General Services Administration
(GSA) maintains the EPLS. When a
Federal agency takes an action to
exclude a person under the
nonprocurement or procurement
(a) At a minimum, the EPLS
indicates—
(1) The full name (where available)
and address of each excluded and
disqualified person, in alphabetical
order, with cross references if more than
one name is involved in a single action;
(2) The type of action;
(3) The cause for the action;
(4) The scope of the action;
(5) Any termination date for the
action;
(6) The Federal agency and name and
telephone number of the agency point of
contact for the action; and
(7) The Dun and Bradstreet Number
(DUNS), or other similar code approved
by the GSA, of the excluded or
disqualified person, if available.
(b)(1) The database for the EPLS
includes a field for the Taxpayer
Identification Number (TIN) (the social
security number (SSN) for an
individual) of an excluded or
disqualified person.
(2) Agencies disclose the SSN of an
individual to verify the identity of an
individual, only if permitted under the
Privacy Act of 1974 and, if appropriate,
the Computer Matching and Privacy
Protection Act of 1988, as codified in 5
U.S.C. 552(a).
§ 180.520 Who places the information into
the EPLS?
Federal agency officials who take
actions to exclude persons under this
part or officials who are responsible for
identifying disqualified persons must
enter the following information about
those persons into the EPLS:
(a) Information required by
§ 180.515(a);
(b) The Taxpayer Identification
Number (TIN) of the excluded or
disqualified person, including the social
security number (SSN) for an
individual, if the number is available
and may be disclosed under law;
(c) Information about an excluded or
disqualified person, generally within
five working days, after—
(1) Taking an exclusion action;
(2) Modifying or rescinding an
exclusion action;
(3) Finding that a person is
disqualified; or
(4) Finding that there has been a
change in the status of a person who is
listed as disqualified.
§ 180.525 Whom do I ask if I have
questions about a person in the EPLS?
If you have questions about a listed
person in the EPLS, ask the point of
contact for the Federal agency that
placed the person’s name into the EPLS.
You may find the agency point of
contact from the EPLS.
§ 180.530
Where can I find the EPLS?
You may access the EPLS through the
Internet, currently at https://
epls.arnet.gov or https://www.epls.gov.
Subpart F—General Principles Relating
to Suspension and Debarment Actions
§ 180.600 How do suspension and
debarment actions start?
When Federal agency officials receive
information from any source concerning
a cause for suspension or debarment,
they will promptly report it and the
agency will investigate. The officials
refer the question of whether to suspend
or debar you to their suspending or
debarring official for consideration, if
appropriate.
§ 180.605 How does suspension differ
from debarment?
Suspension differs from debarment in
that—
A suspending official . . .
A debarring official . . .
(a) Imposes suspension as a temporary status of in eligibility for procurement and nonprocurement transactions, pending completion of
an investigation or legal proceedings.
(b) Must—
(1) Have adequate evidence that there may be a cause for debarment of a person; and
(2) Conclude that immediate action is necessary to protect the
Federal interest
(c) Usually imposes the suspension first, and then promptly notifies the
suspended person, giving the person an opportunity to contest the
suspension and have it lifted.
Imposes debarment for a specified period as a final determination that
a person is not presently responsible.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:43 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Must conclude, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that the
person has engaged in conduct that warrants debarment.
Imposes debarment after giving the respondent notice of the action
and an opportunity to contest the proposed debarment.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
§ 180.610 What procedures does a Federal
agency use in suspension and debarment
actions?
In deciding whether to suspend or
debar you, a Federal agency handles the
actions as informally as practicable,
consistent with principles of
fundamental fairness.
(a) For suspension actions, a Federal
agency uses the procedures in this
subpart and Subpart G of this part.
(b) For debarment actions, a Federal
agency uses the procedures in this
subpart and Subpart H of this part.
§ 180.615 How does a Federal agency
notify a person of a suspension or
debarment action?
(a) The suspending or debarring
official sends a written notice to the last
known street address, facsimile number,
or e-mail address of—
(1) You or your identified counsel; or
(2) Your agent for service of process,
or any of your partners, officers,
directors, owners, or joint venturers.
(b) The notice is effective if sent to
any of these persons.
§ 180.620 Do Federal agencies coordinate
suspension and debarment actions?
Yes, when more than one Federal
agency has an interest in a suspension
or debarment, the agencies may
consider designating one agency as the
lead agency for making the decision.
Agencies are encouraged to establish
methods and procedures for
coordinating their suspension and
debarment actions.
§ 180.625 What is the scope of a
suspension or debarment?
If you are suspended or debarred, the
suspension or debarment is effective as
follows:
(a) Your suspension or debarment
constitutes suspension or debarment of
all of your divisions and other
organizational elements from all
covered transactions, unless the
suspension or debarment decision is
limited—
(1) By its terms to one or more
specifically identified individuals,
divisions, or other organizational
elements; or
(2) To specific types of transactions.
(b) Any affiliate of a participant may
be included in a suspension or
debarment action if the suspending or
debarring official—
(1) Officially names the affiliate in the
notice; and
(2) Gives the affiliate an opportunity
to contest the action.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:43 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
51873
§ 180.630 May a Federal agency impute the
conduct of one person to another?
For purposes of actions taken under
this part, a Federal agency may impute
conduct as follows:
(a) Conduct imputed from an
individual to an organization. A Federal
agency may impute the fraudulent,
criminal, or other improper conduct of
any officer, director, shareholder,
partner, employee, or other individual
associated with an organization, to that
organization when the improper
conduct occurred in connection with
the individual’s performance of duties
for or on behalf of that organization, or
with the organization’s knowledge,
approval or acquiescence. The
organization’s acceptance of the benefits
derived from the conduct is evidence of
knowledge, approval or acquiescence.
(b) Conduct imputed from an
organization to an individual, or
between individuals. A Federal agency
may impute the fraudulent, criminal, or
other improper conduct of any
organization to an individual, or from
one individual to another individual, if
the individual to whom the improper
conduct is imputed either participated
in, had knowledge of, or reason to know
of the improper conduct.
(c) Conduct imputed from one
organization to another organization. A
Federal agency may impute the
fraudulent, criminal, or other improper
conduct of one organization to another
organization when the improper
conduct occurred in connection with a
partnership, joint venture, joint
application, association or similar
arrangement, or when the organization
to whom the improper conduct is
imputed has the power to direct,
manage, control or influence the
activities of the organization responsible
for the improper conduct. Acceptance of
the benefits derived from the conduct is
evidence of knowledge, approval or
acquiescence.
§ 180.645 Do other Federal agencies know
if an agency agrees to a voluntary
exclusion?
(a) Yes, the Federal agency agreeing to
the voluntary exclusion enters
information about it into the EPLS.
(b) Also, any agency or person may
contact the Federal agency that agreed
to the voluntary exclusion to find out
the details of the voluntary exclusion.
§ 180.635 May a Federal agency settle a
debarment or suspension action?
Yes, a Federal agency may settle a
debarment or suspension action at any
time if it is in the best interest of the
Federal Government.
§ 180.640 May a settlement include a
voluntary exclusion?
Yes, if a Federal agency enters into a
settlement with you in which you agree
to be excluded, it is called a voluntary
exclusion and has governmentwide
effect.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Subpart G—Suspension
§ 180.700 When may the suspending
official issue a suspension?
Suspension is a serious action. Using
the procedures of this subpart and
Subpart F of this part, the suspending
official may impose suspension only
when that official determines that—
(a) There exists an indictment for, or
other adequate evidence to suspect, an
offense listed under § 180.800(a), or
(b) There exists adequate evidence to
suspect any other cause for debarment
listed under § 180.800(b) through (d);
and
(c) Immediate action is necessary to
protect the public interest.
§ 180.705 What does the suspending
official consider in issuing a suspension?
(a) In determining the adequacy of the
evidence to support the suspension, the
suspending official considers how much
information is available, how credible it
is given the circumstances, whether or
not important allegations are
corroborated, and what inferences can
reasonably be drawn as a result. During
this assessment, the suspending official
may examine the basic documents,
including grants, cooperative
agreements, loan authorizations,
contracts, and other relevant
documents.
(b) An indictment, conviction, civil
judgment, or other official findings by
Federal, State, or local bodies that
determine factual and/or legal matters,
constitutes adequate evidence for
purposes of suspension actions.
(c) In deciding whether immediate
action is needed to protect the public
interest, the suspending official has
wide discretion. For example, the
suspending official may infer the
necessity for immediate action to
protect the public interest either from
the nature of the circumstances giving
rise to a cause for suspension or from
potential business relationships or
involvement with a program of the
Federal Government.
§ 180.710
effect?
When does a suspension take
A suspension is effective when the
suspending official signs the decision to
suspend.
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
51874
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
§ 180.715 What notice does the
suspending official give me if I am
suspended?
After deciding to suspend you, the
suspending official promptly sends you
a Notice of Suspension advising you—
(a) That you have been suspended;
(b) That your suspension is based
on—
(1) An indictment;
(2) A conviction;
(3) Other adequate evidence that you
have committed irregularities which
seriously reflect on the propriety of
further Federal Government dealings
with you; or
(4) Conduct of another person that has
been imputed to you, or your affiliation
with a suspended or debarred person;
(c) Of any other irregularities in terms
sufficient to put you on notice without
disclosing the Federal Government’s
evidence;
(d) Of the cause(s) upon which the
suspending official relied under
§ 180.700 for imposing suspension;
(e) That your suspension is for a
temporary period pending the
completion of an investigation or
resulting legal or debarment
proceedings;
(f) Of the applicable provisions of this
subpart, Subpart F of this part, and any
other agency procedures governing
suspension decisionmaking; and
(g) Of the governmentwide effect of
your suspension from procurement and
nonprocurement programs and
activities.
§ 180.720 How may I contest a
suspension?
If you as a respondent wish to contest
a suspension, you or your representative
must provide the suspending official
with information in opposition to the
suspension. You may do this orally or
in writing, but any information
provided orally that you consider
important must also be submitted in
writing for the official record.
§ 180.725 How much time do I have to
contest a suspension?
(a) As a respondent you or your
representative must either send, or make
arrangements to appear and present, the
information and argument to the
suspending official within 30 days after
you receive the Notice of Suspension.
(b) The Federal agency taking the
action considers the notice to be
received by you—
(1) When delivered, if the agency
mails the notice to the last known street
address, or five days after the agency
sends it if the letter is undeliverable;
(2) When sent, if the agency sends the
notice by facsimile or five days after the
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:43 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
agency sends it if the facsimile is
undeliverable; or
(3) When delivered, if the agency
sends the notice by e-mail or five days
after the agency sends it if the e-mail is
undeliverable.
§ 180.730 What information must I provide
to the suspending official if I contest the
suspension?
(a) In addition to any information and
argument in opposition, as a respondent
your submission to the suspending
official must identify—
(1) Specific facts that contradict the
statements contained in the Notice of
Suspension. A general denial is
insufficient to raise a genuine dispute
over facts material to the suspension;
(2) All existing, proposed, or prior
exclusions under regulations
implementing Executive Order 12549
and all similar actions taken by Federal,
State, or local agencies, including
administrative agreements that affect
only those agencies;
(3) All criminal and civil proceedings
not included in the Notice of
Suspension that grew out of facts
relevant to the cause(s) stated in the
notice; and
(4) All of your affiliates.
(b) If you fail to disclose this
information, or provide false
information, the Federal agency taking
the action may seek further criminal,
civil or administrative action against
you, as appropriate.
§ 180.735 Under what conditions do I get
an additional opportunity to challenge the
facts on which the suspension is based?
(a) You as a respondent will not have
an additional opportunity to challenge
the facts if the suspending official
determines that—
(1) Your suspension is based upon an
indictment, conviction, civil judgment,
or other finding by a Federal, State, or
local body for which an opportunity to
contest the facts was provided;
(2) Your presentation in opposition
contains only general denials to
information contained in the Notice of
Suspension;
(3) The issues raised in your
presentation in opposition to the
suspension are not factual in nature, or
are not material to the suspending
official’s initial decision to suspend, or
the official’s decision whether to
continue the suspension; or
(4) On the basis of advice from the
Department of Justice, an office of the
United States Attorney, a State attorney
general’s office, or a State or local
prosecutor’s office, that substantial
interests of the government in pending
or contemplated legal proceedings based
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
on the same facts as the suspension
would be prejudiced by conducting factfinding.
(b) You will have an opportunity to
challenge the facts if the suspending
official determines that—
(1) The conditions in paragraph (a) of
this section do not exist; and
(2) Your presentation in opposition
raises a genuine dispute over facts
material to the suspension.
(c) If you have an opportunity to
challenge disputed material facts under
this section, the suspending official or
designee must conduct additional
proceedings to resolve those facts.
§ 180.740
formal?
Are suspension proceedings
(a) Suspension proceedings are
conducted in a fair and informal
manner. The suspending official may
use flexible procedures to allow you to
present matters in opposition. In so
doing, the suspending official is not
required to follow formal rules of
evidence or procedure in creating an
official record upon which the official
will base a final suspension decision.
(b) You as a respondent or your
representative must submit any
documentary evidence you want the
suspending official to consider.
§ 180.745
How is fact-finding conducted?
(a) If fact-finding is conducted—
(1) You may present witnesses and
other evidence, and confront any
witness presented; and
(2) The fact-finder must prepare
written findings of fact for the record.
(b) A transcribed record of factfinding proceedings must be made,
unless you as a respondent and the
Federal agency agree to waive it in
advance. If you want a copy of the
transcribed record, you may purchase it.
§ 180.750 What does the suspending
official consider in deciding whether to
continue or terminate my suspension?
(a) The suspending official bases the
decision on all information contained in
the official record. The record
includes—
(1) All information in support of the
suspending official’s initial decision to
suspend you;
(2) Any further information and
argument presented in support of, or
opposition to, the suspension; and
(3) Any transcribed record of factfinding proceedings.
(b) The suspending official may refer
disputed material facts to another
official for findings of fact. The
suspending official may reject any
resulting findings, in whole or in part,
only after specifically determining them
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
to be arbitrary, capricious, or clearly
erroneous.
§ 180.755 When will I know whether the
suspension is continued or terminated?
The suspending official must make a
written decision whether to continue,
modify, or terminate your suspension
within 45 days of closing the official
record. The official record closes upon
the suspending official’s receipt of final
submissions, information and findings
of fact, if any. The suspending official
may extend that period for good cause.
§ 180.760
last?
How long may my suspension
(a) If legal or debarment proceedings
are initiated at the time of, or during
your suspension, the suspension may
continue until the conclusion of those
proceedings. However, if proceedings
are not initiated, a suspension may not
exceed 12 months.
(b) The suspending official may
extend the 12 month limit under
paragraph (a) of this section for an
additional 6 months if an office of a U.S.
Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
Attorney, or other responsible
prosecuting official requests an
extension in writing. In no event may a
suspension exceed 18 months without
initiating proceedings under paragraph
(a) of this section.
(c) The suspending official must
notify the appropriate officials under
paragraph (b) of this section of an
impending termination of a suspension
at least 30 days before the 12 month
period expires to allow the officials an
opportunity to request an extension.
Subpart H—Debarment
§ 180.800 What are the causes for
debarment?
A Federal agency may debar a person
for—
(a) Conviction of or civil judgment
for—
(1) Commission of fraud or a criminal
offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a
public or private agreement or
transaction;
(2) Violation of Federal or State
antitrust statutes, including those
proscribing price fixing between
competitors, allocation of customers
between competitors, and bid rigging;
(3) Commission of embezzlement,
theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or
destruction of records, making false
statements, tax evasion, receiving stolen
property, making false claims, or
obstruction of justice; or
(4) Commission of any other offense
indicating a lack of business integrity or
business honesty that seriously and
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:43 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
directly affects your present
responsibility;
(b) Violation of the terms of a public
agreement or transaction so serious as to
affect the integrity of an agency
program, such as—
(1) A willful failure to perform in
accordance with the terms of one or
more public agreements or transactions;
(2) A history of failure to perform or
of unsatisfactory performance of one or
more public agreements or transactions;
or
(3) A willful violation of a statutory or
regulatory provision or requirement
applicable to a public agreement or
transaction;
(c) Any of the following causes:
(1) A nonprocurement debarment by
any Federal agency taken before October
1, 1988, or a procurement debarment by
any Federal agency taken pursuant to 48
CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, before August
25, 1995;
(2) Knowingly doing business with an
ineligible person, except as permitted
under § 180.135;
(3) Failure to pay a single substantial
debt, or a number of outstanding debts
(including disallowed costs and
overpayments, but not including sums
owed the Federal Government under the
Internal Revenue Code) owed to any
Federal agency or instrumentality,
provided the debt is uncontested by the
debtor or, if contested, provided that the
debtor’s legal and administrative
remedies have been exhausted;
(4) Violation of a material provision of
a voluntary exclusion agreement entered
into under § 180.640 or of any
settlement of a debarment or suspension
action; or
(5) Violation of the provisions of the
Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41
U.S.C. 701); or
(d) Any other cause of so serious or
compelling a nature that it affects your
present responsibility.
§ 180.805 What notice does the debarring
official give me if I am proposed for
debarment?
After consideration of the causes in
§ 180.800, if the debarring official
proposes to debar you, the official sends
you a Notice of Proposed Debarment,
pursuant to § 180.615, advising you—
(a) That the debarring official is
considering debarring you;
(b) Of the reasons for proposing to
debar you in terms sufficient to put you
on notice of the conduct or transactions
upon which the proposed debarment is
based;
(c) Of the cause(s) under § 180.800
upon which the debarring official relied
for proposing your debarment;
(d) Of the applicable provisions of
this subpart, Subpart F of this part, and
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
51875
any other agency procedures governing
debarment; and
(e) Of the governmentwide effect of a
debarment from procurement and
nonprocurement programs and
activities.
§ 180.810
effect?
When does a debarment take
Unlike suspension, a debarment is not
effective until the debarring official
issues a decision. The debarring official
does not issue a decision until the
respondent has had an opportunity to
contest the proposed debarment.
§ 180.815 How may I contest a proposed
debarment?
If you as a respondent wish to contest
a proposed debarment, you or your
representative must provide the
debarring official with information in
opposition to the proposed debarment.
You may do this orally or in writing, but
any information provided orally that
you consider important must also be
submitted in writing for the official
record.
§ 180.820 How much time do I have to
contest a proposed debarment?
(a) As a respondent you or your
representative must either send, or make
arrangements to appear and present, the
information and argument to the
debarring official within 30 days after
you receive the Notice of Proposed
Debarment.
(b) The Federal agency taking the
action considers the Notice of Proposed
Debarment to be received by you—
(1) When delivered, if the agency
mails the notice to the last known street
address, or five days after the agency
sends it if the letter is undeliverable;
(2) When sent, if the agency sends the
notice by facsimile or five days after the
agency sends it if the facsimile is
undeliverable; or
(3) When delivered, if the agency
sends the notice by e-mail or five days
after the agency sends it if the e-mail is
undeliverable.
§ 180.825 What information must I provide
to the debarring official if I contest the
proposed debarment?
(a) In addition to any information and
argument in opposition, as a respondent
your submission to the debarring official
must identify—
(1) Specific facts that contradict the
statements contained in the Notice of
Proposed Debarment. Include any
information about any of the factors
listed in § 180.860. A general denial is
insufficient to raise a genuine dispute
over facts material to the debarment;
(2) All existing, proposed, or prior
exclusions under regulations
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
51876
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
implementing Executive Order 12549
and all similar actions taken by Federal,
State, or local agencies, including
administrative agreements that affect
only those agencies;
(3) All criminal and civil proceedings
not included in the Notice of Proposed
Debarment that grew out of facts
relevant to the cause(s) stated in the
notice; and
(4) All of your affiliates.
(b) If you fail to disclose this
information, or provide false
information, the Federal agency taking
the action may seek further criminal,
civil or administrative action against
you, as appropriate.
§ 180.830 Under what conditions do I get
an additional opportunity to challenge the
facts on which the proposed debarment is
based?
(a) You as a respondent will not have
an additional opportunity to challenge
the facts if the debarring official
determines that—
(1) Your debarment is based upon a
conviction or civil judgment;
(2) Your presentation in opposition
contains only general denials to
information contained in the Notice of
Proposed Debarment; or
(3) The issues raised in your
presentation in opposition to the
proposed debarment are not factual in
nature, or are not material to the
debarring official’s decision whether to
debar.
(b) You will have an additional
opportunity to challenge the facts if the
debarring official determines that—
(1) The conditions in paragraph (a) of
this section do not exist; and
(2) Your presentation in opposition
raises a genuine dispute over facts
material to the proposed debarment.
(c) If you have an opportunity to
challenge disputed material facts under
this section, the debarring official or
designee must conduct additional
proceedings to resolve those facts.
§ 180.835
formal?
§ 180.840
How is fact-finding conducted?
(a) If fact-finding is conducted—
(1) You may present witnesses and
other evidence, and confront any
witness presented; and
(2) The fact-finder must prepare
written findings of fact for the record.
(b) A transcribed record of factfinding proceedings must be made,
unless you as a respondent and the
Federal agency agree to waive it in
advance. If you want a copy of the
transcribed record, you may purchase it.
§ 180.845 What does the debarring official
consider in deciding whether to debar me?
(a) The debarring official may debar
you for any of the causes in § 180.800.
However, the official need not debar
you even if a cause for debarment exists.
The official may consider the
seriousness of your acts or omissions
and the mitigating or aggravating factors
set forth at § 180.860.
(b) The debarring official bases the
decision on all information contained in
the official record. The record
includes—
(1) All information in support of the
debarring official’s proposed debarment;
(2) Any further information and
argument presented in support of, or in
opposition to, the proposed debarment;
and
(3) Any transcribed record of factfinding proceedings.
(c) The debarring official may refer
disputed material facts to another
official for findings of fact. The
debarring official may reject any
resultant findings, in whole or in part,
only after specifically determining them
to be arbitrary, capricious, or clearly
erroneous.
§ 180.850 What is the standard of proof in
a debarment action?
(a) In any debarment action, the
Federal agency must establish the cause
for debarment by a preponderance of the
evidence.
(b) If the proposed debarment is based
upon a conviction or civil judgment, the
standard of proof is met.
Are debarment proceedings
(a) Debarment proceedings are
conducted in a fair and informal
manner. The debarring official may use
flexible procedures to allow you as a
respondent to present matters in
opposition. In so doing, the debarring
official is not required to follow formal
rules of evidence or procedure in
creating an official record upon which
the official will base the decision
whether to debar.
(b) You or your representative must
submit any documentary evidence you
want the debarring official to consider.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:43 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
§ 180.855 Who has the burden of proof in
a debarment action?
(a) The Federal agency has the burden
to prove that a cause for debarment
exists.
(b) Once a cause for debarment is
established, you as a respondent have
the burden of demonstrating to the
satisfaction of the debarring official that
you are presently responsible and that
debarment is not necessary.
§ 180.860 What factors may influence the
debarring official’s decision?
This section lists the mitigating and
aggravating factors that the debarring
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
official may consider in determining
whether to debar you and the length of
your debarment period. The debarring
official may consider other factors if
appropriate in light of the circumstances
of a particular case. The existence or
nonexistence of any factor, such as one
of those set forth in this section, is not
necessarily determinative of your
present responsibility. In making a
debarment decision, the debarring
official may consider the following
factors:
(a) The actual or potential harm or
impact that results or may result from
the wrongdoing.
(b) The frequency of incidents and/or
duration of the wrongdoing.
(c) Whether there is a pattern or prior
history of wrongdoing. For example, if
you have been found by another Federal
agency or a State agency to have
engaged in wrongdoing similar to that
found in the debarment action, the
existence of this fact may be used by the
debarring official in determining that
you have a pattern or prior history of
wrongdoing.
(d) Whether you are or have been
excluded or disqualified by an agency of
the Federal Government or have not
been allowed to participate in State or
local contracts or assistance agreements
on a basis of conduct similar to one or
more of the causes for debarment
specified in this part.
(e) Whether you have entered into an
administrative agreement with a Federal
agency or a State or local government
that is not governmentwide but is based
on conduct similar to one or more of the
causes for debarment specified in this
part.
(f) Whether and to what extent you
planned, initiated, or carried out the
wrongdoing.
(g) Whether you have accepted
responsibility for the wrongdoing and
recognize the seriousness of the
misconduct that led to the cause for
debarment.
(h) Whether you have paid or agreed
to pay all criminal, civil and
administrative liabilities for the
improper activity, including any
investigative or administrative costs
incurred by the government, and have
made or agreed to make full restitution.
(i) Whether you have cooperated fully
with the government agencies during
the investigation and any court or
administrative action. In determining
the extent of cooperation, the debarring
official may consider when the
cooperation began and whether you
disclosed all pertinent information
known to you.
(j) Whether the wrongdoing was
pervasive within your organization.
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(k) The kind of positions held by the
individuals involved in the wrongdoing.
(l) Whether your organization took
appropriate corrective action or
remedial measures, such as establishing
ethics training and implementing
programs to prevent recurrence.
(m) Whether your principals tolerated
the offense.
(n) Whether you brought the activity
cited as a basis for the debarment to the
attention of the appropriate government
agency in a timely manner.
(o) Whether you have fully
investigated the circumstances
surrounding the cause for debarment
and, if so, made the result of the
investigation available to the debarring
official.
(p) Whether you had effective
standards of conduct and internal
control systems in place at the time the
questioned conduct occurred.
(q) Whether you have taken
appropriate disciplinary action against
the individuals responsible for the
activity which constitutes the cause for
debarment.
(r) Whether you have had adequate
time to eliminate the circumstances
within your organization that led to the
cause for the debarment.
(s) Other factors that are appropriate
to the circumstances of a particular case.
§ 180.865
last?
How long may my debarment
(a) If the debarring official decides to
debar you, your period of debarment
will be based on the seriousness of the
cause(s) upon which your debarment is
based. Generally, debarment should not
exceed three years. However, if
circumstances warrant, the debarring
official may impose a longer period of
debarment.
(b) In determining the period of
debarment, the debarring official may
consider the factors in § 180.860. If a
suspension has preceded your
debarment, the debarring official must
consider the time you were suspended.
(c) If the debarment is for a violation
of the provisions of the Drug-Free
Workplace Act of 1988, your period of
debarment may not exceed five years.
§ 180.870 When do I know if the debarring
official debars me?
(a) The debarring official must make
a written decision whether to debar
within 45 days of closing the official
record. The official record closes upon
the debarring official’s receipt of final
submissions, information and findings
of fact, if any. The debarring official
may extend that period for good cause.
(b) The debarring official sends you
written notice, pursuant to § 180.615
that the official decided, either—
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:43 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
(1) Not to debar you; or
(2) To debar you. In this event, the
notice:
(i) Refers to the Notice of Proposed
Debarment;
(ii) Specifies the reasons for your
debarment;
(iii) States the period of your
debarment, including the effective
dates; and
(iv) Advises you that your debarment
is effective for covered transactions and
contracts that are subject to the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter
1), throughout the executive branch of
the Federal Government unless an
agency head or an authorized designee
grants an exception.
§ 180.875 May I ask the debarring official
to reconsider a decision to debar me?
Yes, as a debarred person you may ask
the debarring official to reconsider the
debarment decision or to reduce the
time period or scope of the debarment.
However, you must put your request in
writing and support it with
documentation.
§ 180.880 What factors may influence the
debarring official during reconsideration?
The debarring official may reduce or
terminate your debarment based on—
(a) Newly discovered material
evidence;
(b) A reversal of the conviction or
civil judgment upon which your
debarment was based;
(c) A bona fide change in ownership
or management;
(d) Elimination of other causes for
which the debarment was imposed; or
(e) Other reasons the debarring official
finds appropriate.
§ 180.885 May the debarring official extend
a debarment?
(a) Yes, the debarring official may
extend a debarment for an additional
period, if that official determines that an
extension is necessary to protect the
public interest.
(b) However, the debarring official
may not extend a debarment solely on
the basis of the facts and circumstances
upon which the initial debarment action
was based.
(c) If the debarring official decides
that a debarment for an additional
period is necessary, the debarring
official must follow the applicable
procedures in this subpart, and Subpart
F of this part, to extend the debarment.
§ 180.905
51877
Affiliate.
Persons are affiliates of each other if,
directly or indirectly, either one
controls or has the power to control the
other or a third person controls or has
the power to control both. The ways a
Federal agency may determine control
include, but are not limited to—
(a) Interlocking management or
ownership;
(b) Identity of interests among family
members;
(c) Shared facilities and equipment;
(d) Common use of employees; or
(e) A business entity which has been
organized following the exclusion of a
person which has the same or similar
management, ownership, or principal
employees as the excluded person.
§ 180.910
Agent or representative.
Agent or representative means any
person who acts on behalf of, or who is
authorized to commit a participant in a
covered transaction.
§ 180.915
Civil judgment.
Civil judgment means the disposition
of a civil action by any court of
competent jurisdiction, whether by
verdict, decision, settlement,
stipulation, other disposition which
creates a civil liability for the
complained of wrongful acts, or a final
determination of liability under the
Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of
1988 (31 U.S.C. 3801–3812).
§ 180.920
Conviction.
Conviction means—
(a) A judgment or any other
determination of guilt of a criminal
offense by any court of competent
jurisdiction, whether entered upon a
verdict or plea, including a plea of nolo
contendere; or
(b) Any other resolution that is the
functional equivalent of a judgment,
including probation before judgment
and deferred prosecution. A disposition
without the participation of the court is
the functional equivalent of a judgment
only if it includes an admission of guilt.
§ 180.925
Debarment.
Subpart I—Definitions
Debarment means an action taken by
a debarring official under Subpart H of
this part to exclude a person from
participating in covered transactions
and transactions covered under the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR
chapter 1). A person so excluded is
debarred.
§ 180.900
§ 180.930
Adequate evidence.
Adequate evidence means
information sufficient to support the
reasonable belief that a particular act or
omission has occurred.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Debarring official.
Debarring official means an agency
official who is authorized to impose
debarment. A debarring official is
either—
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
51878
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
§ 180.965
(a) The agency head; or
(b) An official designated by the
agency head.
§ 180.935
Disqualified.
Disqualified means that a person is
prohibited from participating in
specified Federal procurement or
nonprocurement transactions as
required under a statute, Executive
order (other than Executive Orders
12549 and 12689) or other authority.
Examples of disqualifications include
persons prohibited under—
(a) The Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C.
276(a));
(b) The equal employment
opportunity acts and Executive orders;
or
(c) The Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.
7606), Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368)
and Executive Order 11738 (3 CFR, 1973
Comp., p. 799).
§ 180.940
Excluded or exclusion.
Excluded or exclusion means—
(a) That a person or commodity is
prohibited from being a participant in
covered transactions, whether the
person has been suspended; debarred;
proposed for debarment under 48 CFR
part 9, subpart 9.4; voluntarily
excluded; or
(b) The act of excluding a person.
§ 180.945
(EPLS).
Excluded Parties List System
Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)
means the list maintained and
disseminated by the General Services
Administration (GSA) containing the
names and other information about
persons who are ineligible.
§ 180.950
Federal agency.
Federal agency means any United
States executive department, military
department, defense agency or any other
agency of the executive branch. Other
agencies of the Federal government are
not considered ‘‘agencies’’ for the
purposes of this part unless they issue
regulations adopting the
governmentwide Debarment and
Suspension system under Executive
Orders 12549 and 12689.
§ 180.955
Indictment.
Indictment means an indictment for a
criminal offense. A presentment,
information, or other filing by a
competent authority charging a criminal
offense shall be given the same effect as
an indictment.
§ 180.960
Ineligible or ineligibility.
Ineligible or ineligibility means that a
person or commodity is prohibited from
covered transactions because of an
exclusion or disqualification.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:43 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
Legal proceedings.
Legal proceedings means any criminal
proceeding or any civil judicial
proceeding, including a proceeding
under the Program Fraud Civil
Remedies Act (31 U.S.C. 3801–3812), to
which the Federal Government or a
State or local government or quasigovernmental authority is a party. The
term also includes appeals from those
proceedings.
§ 180.970
Nonprocurement transaction.
(a) Nonprocurement transaction
means any transaction, regardless of
type (except procurement contracts),
including, but not limited to the
following:
(1) Grants.
(2) Cooperative agreements.
(3) Scholarships.
(4) Fellowships.
(5) Contracts of assistance.
(6) Loans.
(7) Loan guarantees.
(8) Subsidies.
(9) Insurances.
(10) Payments for specified uses.
(11) Donation agreements.
(b) A nonprocurement transaction at
any tier does not require the transfer of
Federal funds.
§ 180.975
Notice.
Notice means a written
communication served in person, sent
by certified mail or its equivalent, or
sent electronically by e-mail or
facsimile. (See § 180. 615.)
§ 180.980
Participant.
Participant means any person who
submits a proposal for or who enters
into a covered transaction, including an
agent or representative of a participant.
(1) Is in a position to handle Federal
funds;
(2) Is in a position to influence or
control the use of those funds; or,
(3) Occupies a technical or
professional position capable of
substantially influencing the
development or outcome of an activity
required to perform the covered
transaction.
§ 180.1000
Respondent.
Respondent means a person against
whom an agency has initiated a
debarment or suspension action.
§ 180.1005
State.
(a) State means—
(1) Any of the states of the United
States;
(2) The District of Columbia;
(3) The Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico;
(4) Any territory or possession of the
United States; or
(5) Any agency or instrumentality of
a state.
(b) For purposes of this part, State
does not include institutions of higher
education, hospitals, or units of local
government.
§ 180.1010
Suspending official.
(a) Suspending official means an
agency official who is authorized to
impose suspension. The suspending
official is either:
(1) The agency head; or
(2) An official designated by the
agency head.
§ 180.1015
Suspension.
Preponderance of the evidence means
proof by information that, compared
with information opposing it, leads to
the conclusion that the fact at issue is
more probably true than not.
Suspension is an action taken by a
suspending official under subpart G of
this part that immediately prohibits a
person from participating in covered
transactions and transactions covered
under the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1) for a
temporary period, pending completion
of an agency investigation and any
judicial or administrative proceedings
that may ensue. A person so excluded
is suspended.
§ 180.995
§ 180.1020 Voluntary exclusion or
voluntarily excluded.
§ 180.985
Person.
Person means any individual,
corporation, partnership, association,
unit of government, or legal entity,
however organized.
§ 180.990
Preponderance of the evidence.
Principal.
Principal means—
(a) An officer, director, owner,
partner, principal investigator, or other
person within a participant with
management or supervisory
responsibilities related to a covered
transaction; or
(b) A consultant or other person,
whether or not employed by the
participant or paid with Federal funds,
who—
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(a) Voluntary exclusion means a
person’s agreement to be excluded
under the terms of a settlement between
the person and one or more agencies.
Voluntary exclusion must have
governmentwide effect.
(b) Voluntarily excluded means the
status of a person who has agreed to a
voluntary exclusion.
BILLING CODE 3110–01–P
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
§ 215.13
PART 215—[AMENDED]
Federal awarding agencies and
recipients shall comply with Federal
agency regulations implementing E.O.s
12549 and 12689, ‘‘Debarment and
Suspension.’’ Under those regulations,
certain parties who are debarred,
suspended or otherwise excluded may
not be participants or principals in
Federal assistance awards and
subawards, and in certain contracts
under those awards and subawards.
3. The authority citation for part 215
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 503; 31 U.S.C. 1111;
41 U.S.C. 405; Reorganization Plan No. 2 of
1970; E.O. 11541, 35 FR 10737, 3 CFR, 1966–
1970, p. 939.
4. Section 215.13 is revised to read as
follows:
I
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:43 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Debarment and suspension.
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
5. Paragraph 8 of Appendix A to part
215 is revised to read as follows:
I
Appendix A to Part 215—Contract
Provisions
*
*
*
*
*
8. Debarment and Suspension (E.O.s 12549
and 12689)—A contract award with an
amount expected to equal or exceed $25,000
and certain other contract awards (see 2 CFR
180.220) shall not be made to parties listed
on the government-wide Excluded Parties
List System, in accordance with the OMB
guidelines at 2 CFR part 180 that implement
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
ER31AU05.000
BILLING CODE 3110–01–C
51879
51880
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
E.O.s 12549 (3 CFR, 1986 Comp., p. 189) and
12689 (3 CFR, 1989 Comp., p. 235),
‘‘Debarment and Suspension.’’ The Excluded
Parties List System contains the names of
parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise
excluded by agencies, as well as parties
declared ineligible under statutory or
regulatory authority other than E.O. 12549.
[FR Doc. 05–16647 Filed 8–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110–01–P
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
2 CFR Parts 215 and 220
Cost Principles for Educational
Institutions (OMB Circular A–21)
AGENCY:
Office of Management and
Budget.
Relocation of policy guidance to
2 CFR chapter II.
ACTION:
The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) is relocating OMB
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions,’’ to Title 2 in
the Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR),
subtitle A, chapter II, part 220. This
relocation is part of our broader
initiative to create 2 CFR as a single
location where the public can find both
OMB guidance for grants and
agreements and the associated Federal
agency implementing regulations. The
broader initiative provides a good
foundation for streamlining and
simplifying the policy framework for
grants and agreements, one objective of
OMB and Federal agency efforts to
implement the Federal Financial
Assistance Management Improvement
Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106–107).
Furthermore, this document makes
changes to 2 CFR part 215, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Agreements With Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other
Non-Profit Organizations (OMB Circular
A–110). The changes will add to part
215 new references to 2 CFR parts 220,
225, and 230 for the cost principles in
OMB Circulars A–21, A–87, and A–122,
respectively; will update part 215 to
include a citation for the Social Security
Administration’s grant regulation; and
will correct part 215 to add the
amendatory language of A–110
published on October 8, 1999, and to
correct a typographic error.
DATES: This document is effective
August 31, 2005. This document
republishes the existing OMB Circular
A–21, which already is in effect.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gil
Tran, Office of Federal Financial
Management, Office of Management and
Budget, telephone (202) 395–3052
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:43 Aug 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
(direct) or (202) 395–3993 (main office)
and e-mail Hai_M._Tran@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May
10, 2004 [69 FR 25970], we revised the
three OMB circulars containing Federal
cost principles. The purpose of those
revisions was to simplify the cost
principles by making the descriptions of
similar cost items consistent across the
circulars where possible, thereby
reducing the possibility of
misinterpretation. Those revisions
resulted from OMB and Federal agency
efforts to implement Public Law 106–
107, and were effective on June 9, 2004.
In this document and the two
documents immediately following this
one, we relocate those three OMB
circulars to the CFR, in Title 2 which
was established on May 11, 2004 [69 FR
26276] as a central location for OMB
and Federal agency policies on grants
and agreements. When we established 2
CFR and relocated OMB Circular A–110
in that new title, we stated that we
would relocate in the near future the
other OMB circulars related to grants
and agreements. Today’s documents are
a significant step toward that end.
Our relocation of OMB Circular A–21
does not change the substance of the
circular. Other than adjustments needed
to conform to the formatting
requirements of the CFR, this notice
relocates in 2 CFR the version of OMB
Circular A–21 as revised by the May 10,
2004 notice.
Conforming changes to 2 CFR part
215. There is a need for conforming
changes to 2 CFR part 215, which
contains administrative requirements
for grants and other financial assistance
agreements with educational
institutions and other nonprofit
organizations. The amendments to
§ 215.25(c)(6) and (e), § 215.27, and
§ 215.29(b) add the new references to 2
CFR parts 220, 225, and 230 for the cost
principles in OMB Circulars A–21, A–
87, and A–122, respectively.
Update and corrections to 2 CFR part
215. Additional changes to 2 CFR part
215 are needed to update § 215.5 and to
correct § 215.36 and § 215.72. The
update to § 215.5 adds the CFR citation
for the Social Security Administration’s
(SSA) implementation of the grants
management common rule, ‘‘Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Cooperative Agreements to State
and Local Governments.’’ The changes
to § 215.36 provide the corrections
needed to include the amendments to
OMB Circular A–110 that were
published as final on October 8, 1999
[64 FR 54926] and were inadvertently
omitted from our publication of part 215
last year [69 FR 26281]. The change to
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
§ 215.72 provides correction for a longstanding typo.
List of Subjects
2 CFR Part 215
Accounting, Colleges and universities,
Cooperative agreements, Grant
programs, Grants administration,
Hospitals, Nonprofit organizations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
2 CFR Part 220
Accounting, Colleges and universities,
Grant programs, Grant administrations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 8, 2005.
Joshua B. Bolten,
Director.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth above, the
Office of Management and Budget
amends 2 CFR, subtitle A, chapter II, as
follows:
I
PART 215—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 215
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 503; 31 U.S.C. 1111;
41 U.S.C. 405; Reorganization Plan No. 2 of
1970; E.O. 11541, 35 FR 10737, 3 CFR, 1966–
1970, p. 939.
§ 215.5
[Amended]
2. Section 215.5 is amended by adding
‘‘20 CFR part 437,’’ following ‘‘15 CFR
part 24,’’.
I 3. Section 215.25 is amended by
revising paragraphs (c)(6) and (e) to read
as follows:
I
§ 215.25
plans.
Revision of budget and program
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(6) The inclusion, unless waived by
the Federal awarding agency, of costs
that require prior approval in
accordance with any of the following, as
applicable:
(i) 2 CFR part 220, ‘‘Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions (OMB
Circular A–21);’’
(ii) 2 CFR part 230, ‘‘Cost Principles
for Non-Profit Organizations (OMB
Circular A–122);’’
(iii) 45 CFR part 74, Appendix E,
‘‘Principles for Determining Costs
Applicable to Research and
Development under Grants and
Contracts with Hospitals;’’ and
(iv) 48 CFR part 31, ‘‘Contract Cost
Principles and Procedures.’’
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Except for requirements listed in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(4) of this
E:\FR\FM\31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 31, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51863-51880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16647]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
2 CFR Parts 180 and 215
Guidance for Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement)
AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget.
ACTION: Interim final guidance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is updating its
guidance on nonprocurement debarment and suspension to conform to the
common rule that 33 Federal agencies published on November 26, 2003.
The agencies issued that common rule after resolving public comments
received in response to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. In updating
the guidance, the OMB is making two improvements to streamline the
policy framework in this area.
First, we are issuing the guidance in a format that is suitable for
Federal agency adoption. Agency adoption of the guidance will reduce
the volume of Federal regulations on nonprocurement debarment and
suspension, making it easier for the affected public to use, and easier
and less expensive for the Federal Government to maintain.
Second, we are publishing the guidance in the recently established
Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR). Locating it in 2
CFR will make it easier to find. Also, the OMB guidance will be co-
located in the same title of the CFR as Federal agencies' implementing
regulations that adopt the guidance. That is, consistent with the
framework put in place when OMB established Title 2, each Federal
agency will issue its implementing regulation in its chapter in
Subtitle B of 2 CFR. This notice also makes minor changes to the
previously issued 2 CFR part 215, to conform that part with the
guidance published today.
DATES: The effective date for this interim final guidance is September
30, 2005. To be considered in preparation of the final guidance,
comments on the interim final guidance must be received by October 31,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Due to potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of
mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, we encourage respondents to
submit comments electronically to ensure timely receipt. We cannot
guarantee that comments mailed will be received before the comment
closing date.
Electronic mail comments may be submitted to: ephillip@omb.eop.gov.
Please include ``OMB suspension and debarment guidance'' in the subject
line of your e-mail message. Also, please include the full body of your
comments in the text of the electronic message, as well as in an
attachment. Please include your name, title, organization, postal
address, telephone number, and e-mail address in the text of the
message. Comments may also be submitted via facsimile to (202) 395-
3952.
Comments may be mailed to Elizabeth Phillips, Office of Federal
Financial Management, Office of Management and Budget, Room 6025, New
Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Phillips, Office of Federal
Financial Management, Office of Management and Budget, telephone (202)
395-3053 (direct) or (202) 395-3993 (main office) and e-mail:
ephillip@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background. The guidance updated by this
notice originated with Executive Order (E.O.) 12549, ``Debarment and
Suspension.'' That Executive order, issued in 1986, gave government-
wide effect to each agency's nonprocurement debarment and suspension
actions. Section 6 of the Executive order authorized OMB to issue
guidance on nonprocurement debarment and suspension. Section 3 directed
agencies to issue implementing regulations consistent with the
guidance.
The guidance has been revised twice since OMB first issued it in
1987 [52 FR 20360]. In 1988, when the agencies finalized a common rule
to implement OMB's 1987 guidance, OMB revised its
[[Page 51864]]
guidance [53 FR 19160] to conform with the agencies' rule. The second
revision of the OMB guidance occurred in 1995 [60 FR 33036]. That
revision conformed the guidance with the Federal agencies' update of
the common rule to give reciprocal government-wide effect to both
procurement and nonprocurement debarment and suspension actions, an
update which implemented E.O. 12689 and section 2455 of the Federal
Acquisition Streamlining Act.
Today's notice conforms the guidance with the Federal agencies'
November 26, 2003, update to the common rule [68 FR 66534], but does so
in a way that will greatly improve the relationship between OMB's
guidance and Federal agencies' implementing regulations. In the recent
update, the Federal agencies recast the common rule in plain language
and made other needed improvements. OMB did not issue a notice at that
time to amend the guidance because we were considering two improvements
to the approach we had used in the past.
Adoptable guidance. The first improvement to our past approach is
to publish the full text of the OMB guidance in a form suitable for
agency adoption. The 1988 and 1995 notices amended the guidance to
conform with updates to the common rule but the guidance was not
published anywhere in full text as an OMB issuance. Thus, the full text
of policies and procedures on nonprocurement debarment and suspension
had to appear in each of 33 Federal agencies' separate codifications of
the common rule. Today's notice, by publishing the OMB guidance in a
form that Federal agencies can adopt, eliminates the need for each
agency to repeat the full text in its own implementing regulation.
This fundamentally different approach of adoptable guidance has
three major advantages over the previous approach of having each agency
codify the full-text of a common rule. Specifically, the new approach
will:
Make it easier for recipients of covered transactions or
respondents in suspension or debarment actions to discern agency-to-
agency variations from the common rule language. When agencies
published the common rule on nonprocurement debarment and suspension,
each agency was allowed to have some agency-specific additions or
exceptions to the government-wide language. Because each agency's
variations are embedded in and integrated with the agency's publication
of the full-text of the rule, it is difficult for a recipient or
respondent that does business with multiple Federal agencies to
identify the agency-to-agency variations in the language. To do so, it
either must locate the original Federal Register notice in which the
agencies published the common rule or carefully read and compare the
agencies' separate codifications of the rule. With the new approach,
however, each agency's implementation of the guidelines will be a brief
rule that: (1) Adopts the guidance, giving it regulatory effect for
that agency's activities; and (2) states any agency-specific additions,
clarifications, and exceptions to the government-wide policies and
procedures contained in the guidance.
Reduce the volume of Federal regulations in the CFR. The
33 individual agencies' separate codifications of the full text of the
common rule currently require about 750 pages in each paper copy of
each edition of the Code of Federal Regulations (i.e., about 750,000
pages for every 1,000 paper copies of the CFR that are produced). We
estimate that the new approach will reduce this by about six-fold,
which reduces both burdens on the public and costs of maintaining the
regulations.
Streamline the process for updating the government-wide
requirements on nonprocurement debarment and suspension. The process
for updating a common rule is exceedingly complex and time consuming.
The 33 Federal agencies must process the same rulemaking document
before it can be sent to the OMB and published in the Federal Register,
which can create long delays in updating the rule. With the new
approach, OMB will publish proposed changes to the guidance in the
Federal Register, with an opportunity for the public to comment. Once
agencies have issued their regulations adopting the guidance, the
process for future updates will be complete when OMB issues the final
guidance. Agencies will not need to amend their regulations adopting
the guidance.
Publication of the guidance in 2 CFR. The second improvement to our
past approach is to locate the OMB guidance in Subtitle A of the new
Title 2 of the CFR, ``Grants and Agreements,'' that OMB established on
May 11, 2004 [69 FR 26276]. Publishing the guidance in the CFR makes it
very accessible to the affected public and, when agencies issue their
new regulations adopting the guidance, will co-locate the OMB guidance
in the same CFR title with the agency rules. We also will maintain a
copy of the current guidance at the OMB Web site (https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars), for the benefit of individuals who
would prefer to access it there.
Structure and content of the guidance. Our intent is to issue OMB
guidance that is substantively unchanged from the common rule issued by
the Federal agencies in November 2003. We modified some of the
structure and language of the common rule, however, to create a part
that reads properly as OMB guidance to agencies rather than an agency
regulation.
The most significant structural change is in Sections 180.05 to
180.45 of the document, which precede subpart A. The primary purpose of
these sections is to provide OMB guidance to Federal agencies on how to
use the guidance in the remainder of the part. Sections 180.20 through
180.35, for example, tell Federal agencies that they must issue
regulations to implement the guidance, identify some required and some
optional content for those regulations, and specify where and when the
agencies must issue the regulations. Most of these early sections have
no counterparts in the November 2003 common rule, since it was designed
to be an agency rule rather than OMB guidance.
Following section 180.45, in subparts A through I of the part, is
the guidance that an agency would adopt to specify its policies and
procedures for nonprocurement debarment and suspension. Several
sections in subpart A of the guidance have different section numbers
than their counterpart sections in the common rule. The changed section
numbers are due to the inclusion of the OMB guidance in sections 180.05
through 180.45, which displaced and forced renumbering of sections
--.25 to --.75 that preceded subpart A in the November 2003 common
rule.
The only other portion of the guidance where section numbers vary
from the November 2003 common rule is subpart I, which contains
definitions of terms. We replaced the defined term ``agency'' in the
common rule with the term ``Federal agency'' in the OMB guidelines,
which forced a reorganization of the definition sections in subpart I
to keep the defined terms in alphabetical order.
In one section of subpart A, we made a wording change to clarify
the substance. Section --.135 of the November 2003 common rule stated
that an agency, given an appropriate cause for debarment, could take an
action to exclude ``any person who has been involved, is currently
involved, or may reasonably be expected to be involved in a covered
transaction.'' The corresponding language in the OMB guidelines, which
is in section 180.150,
[[Page 51865]]
is ``any person who has been, is, or may reasonably be expected to be a
participant or principal in a covered transaction.'' The revised
language is intended to be more precise than the somewhat vague wording
of the common rule.
One language change throughout the guidelines is use of the term
``Federal agency'' where agency responsibilities, authorities, and
procedures are described. The common rule used the personal pronoun
``we,'' which was appropriate in an agency rule but not in OMB
guidance.
We also dropped the references in sections 180.530 and 180.945 of
the guidance (which had the same section numbers in the common rule) to
the paper version of the list of excluded parties maintained by the
General Services Administration (GSA). Section --.530 of the November
2003 common rule stated that Federal agencies anticipated that the
paper version of the list would be discontinued. The paper version no
longer is available, so we deleted the references to it.
Other minor wording changes throughout subparts A through I are to
make the document read properly as OMB guidance. We have posted a
source and destination table at the OMB Web site that shows which
section in the OMB guidance corresponds to each section in the common
rule and summarizes the more significant changes, none of which we
believe to be substantive change.
Invitation to comment. Our intent is to preserve in the OMB
guidance the substantive content of the November 2003 common rule.
Given that the agencies published the final common rule after an
opportunity for public comment, we are publishing these guidelines as
interim final guidelines, rather than proposing the substance for
comment again. For future updates to this guidance, we will propose
substantive changes with an opportunity for public comment, in
accordance with Sec. 180.40 of the guidance. In soliciting comments on
the interim final guidance, we are not seeking to revisit substantive
issues raised by those earlier comments and resolved by the agencies
during preparation of their final rule. However, we invite comments on
any unintended changes we have made in the guidance relative to the
November 2003 common rule.
Next steps. We will finalize the guidance after resolving any
comments received on the interim final version published in this
notice. Each Federal agency that is a signatory to the common rule on
nonprocurement debarment and suspension will: (1) Establish its chapter
in Subtitle B of 2 CFR, consistent with the structure established for
that title; (2) issue in that chapter of 2 CFR its brief rule adopting
the OMB guidance and stating any additions, clarifications, or
exceptions to the policies and procedures contained in the guidance;
and (3) remove the November 2003 common rule from its own CFR title. We
expect to complete the process in calendar year 2006.
Conforming 2 CFR part 215 (OMB Circular A-110). We also are making
the following two changes to 2 CFR part 215, in order to conform the
OMB guidance in that part with the guidance on nonprocurement debarment
and suspension:
We dropped the reference in Sec. 215.13 to the common
rule on nonprocurement debarment and suspension, in anticipation of
agencies adoption of the guidance and removal of the common rule from
their titles in the CFR.
We revised Paragraph 8 in Appendix A to 2 CFR part 215, to
correct: (1) The name of the Excluded Parties List System; and (2) the
threshold for coverage of procurement contracts awarded by recipients
of Federal financial assistance awards.
List of Subjects
2 CFR Part 180
Administrative practice and procedure, Grant programs, Loan
programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
2 CFR Part 215
Accounting, Colleges and Universities, Grant programs, Hospitals,
Nonprofit organizations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 8, 2005.
Joshua B. Bolten,
Director.
Authority and Issuance
0
For the reasons set forth above, the Office of Management and Budget
amends 2 CFR, Subtitle A, as follows:
Chapter I--Office of Management and Budget Governmentwide Guidance for
Grants and Agreements
0
1. A heading is added to chapter I to read as set forth above.
0
2. Part 180 is added to Chapter I, to read as follows:
PART 180--OMB GUIDELINES TO AGENCIES ON GOVERNMENTWIDE DEBARMENT
AND SUSPENSION (NONPROCUREMENT)
Sec.
180.5 What does this part do?
180.10 How is this part organized?
180.15 To whom do these guidelines apply?
180.20 What must a Federal agency do to implement these guidelines?
180.25 What must a Federal agency address in its implementation of
these guidelines?
180.30 Where does a Federal agency implement these guidelines?
180.35 By when must a Federal agency implement these guidelines?
180.40 How are these guidelines maintained?
180.45 Do these guidelines cover persons who are disqualified, as
well as those who are excluded from nonprocurement transactions?
Subpart A--General
180.100 How are subparts A through I organized?
180.105 How is this part written?
180.110 Do terms in this part have special meanings?
180.115 What do subparts A through I of this part do?
180.120 Do subparts A through I of this part apply to me?
180.125 What is the purpose of the nonprocurement debarment and
suspension system?
180.130 How does an exclusion restrict a person's involvement in
covered transactions?
180.135 May a Federal agency grant an exception to let an excluded
person participate in a covered transaction?
180.140 Does an exclusion under the nonprocurement system affect a
person's eligibility for Federal procurement contracts?
180.145 Does an exclusion under the Federal procurement system
affect a person's eligibility to participate in nonprocurement
transactions?
180.150 Against whom may a Federal agency take an exclusion action?
180.155 How do I know if a person is excluded?
Subpart B--Covered Transactions
180.200 What is a covered transaction?
180.205 Why is it important to know if a particular transaction is a
covered transaction?
180.210 Which nonprocurement transactions are covered transactions?
180.215 Which nonprocurement transactions are not covered
transactions?
180.220 Are any procurement contracts included as covered
transactions?
180.225 How do I know if a transaction in which I may participate is
a covered transaction?
[[Page 51866]]
Subpart C--Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions
Doing Business With Other Persons
180.300 What must I do before I enter into a covered transaction
with another person at the next lower tier?
180.305 May I enter into a covered transaction with an excluded or
disqualified person?
180.310 What must I do if a Federal agency excludes a person with
whom I am already doing business in a covered transaction?
180.315 May I use the services of an excluded person as a principal
under a covered transaction?
180.320 Must I verify that principals of my covered transactions are
eligible to participate?
180.325 What happens if I do business with an excluded person in a
covered transaction?
180.330 What requirements must I pass down to persons at lower tiers
with whom I intend to do business?
Disclosing Information--Primary Tier Participants
180.335 What information must I provide before entering into a
covered transaction with a Federal agency?
180.340 If I disclose unfavorable information required under Sec.
180.335 will I be prevented from participating in the transaction?
180.345 What happens if I fail to disclose information required
under Sec. 180.335?
180.350 What must I do if I learn of information required under
Sec. 180.335 after entering into a covered transaction with a
Federal agency?
Disclosing Information--Lower Tier Participants
180.355 What information must I provide to a higher tier participant
before entering into a covered transaction with that participant?
180.360 What happens if I fail to disclose information required
under Sec. 180.355?
180.365 What must I do if I learn of information required under
Sec. 180.355 after entering into a covered transaction with a
higher tier participant?
Subpart D--Responsibilities of Federal Agency Officials Regarding
Transactions
180.400 May I enter into a transaction with an excluded or
disqualified person?
180.405 May I enter into a covered transaction with a participant if
a principal of the transaction is excluded?
180.410 May I approve a participant's use of the services of an
excluded person?
180.415 What must I do if a Federal agency excludes the participant
or a principal after I enter into a covered transaction?
180.420 May I approve a transaction with an excluded or disqualified
person at a lower tier?
180.425 When do I check to see if a person is excluded or
disqualified?
180.430 How do I check to see if a person is excluded or
disqualified?
180.435 What must I require of a primary tier participant?
180.440 What action may I take if a primary tier participant
knowingly does business with an excluded or disqualified person?
180.445 What action may I take if a primary tier participant fails
to disclose the information required under Sec. 180.335?
180.450 What may I do if a lower tier participant fails to disclose
the information required under Sec. 180.355 to the next higher
tier?
Subpart E--Excluded Parties List System
180.500 What is the purpose of the Excluded Parties List System
(EPLS)?
180.505 Who uses the EPLS?
180.510 Who maintains the EPLS?
180.515 What specific information is in the EPLS?
180.520 Who places the information into the EPLS?
180.525 Whom do I ask if I have questions about a person in the
EPLS?
180.530 Where can I find the EPLS?
Subpart F--General Principles Relating to Suspension and Debarment
Actions
180.600 How do suspension and debarment actions start?
180.605 How does suspension differ from debarment?
180.610 What procedures does a Federal agency use in suspension and
debarment actions?
180.615 How does a Federal agency notify a person of a suspension or
debarment action?
180.620 Do Federal agencies coordinate suspension and debarment
actions?
180.625 What is the scope of a suspension or debarment?
180.630 May a Federal agency impute the conduct of one person to
another?
180.635 May a Federal agency settle a debarment or suspension
action?
180.640 May a settlement include a voluntary exclusion?
180.645 Do other Federal agencies know if an agency agrees to a
voluntary exclusion?
Subpart G--Suspension
180.700 When may the suspending official issue a suspension?
180.705 What does the suspending official consider in issuing a
suspension?
180.710 When does a suspension take effect?
180.715 What notice does the suspending official give me if I am
suspended?
180.720 How may I contest a suspension?
180.725 How much time do I have to contest a suspension?
180.730 What information must I provide to the suspending official
if I contest the suspension?
180.735 Under what conditions do I get an additional opportunity to
challenge the facts on which the suspension is based?
180.740 Are suspension proceedings formal?
180.745 How is fact-finding conducted?
180.750 What does the suspending official consider in deciding
whether to continue or terminate my suspension?
180.755 When will I know whether the suspension is continued or
terminated?
180.760 How long may my suspension last?
Subpart H--Debarment
180.800 What are the causes for debarment?
180.805 What notice does the debarring official give me if I am
proposed for debarment?
180.810 When does a debarment take effect?
180.815 How may I contest a proposed debarment?
180.820 How much time do I have to contest a proposed debarment?
180.825 What information must I provide to the debarring official if
I contest the proposed debarment?
180.830 Under what conditions do I get an additional opportunity to
challenge the facts on which the proposed debarment is based?
180.835 Are debarment proceedings formal?
180.840 How is fact-finding conducted?
180.845 What does the debarring official consider in deciding
whether to debar me?
180.850 What is the standard of proof in a debarment action?
180.855 Who has the burden of proof in a debarment action?
180.860 What factors may influence the debarring official's
decision?
180.865 How long may my debarment last?
180.870 When do I know if the debarring official debars me?
180.875 May I ask the debarring official to reconsider a decision to
debar me?
180.880 What factors may influence the debarring official during
reconsideration?
180.885 May the debarring official extend a debarment?
Subpart I--Definitions
180.900 Adequate evidence.
180.905 Affiliate.
180.910 Agent or representative.
180.915 Civil judgment.
180.920 Conviction.
180.925 Debarment.
180.930 Debarring official.
180.935 Disqualified.
180.940 Excluded or exclusion.
180.945 Excluded Parties List System (EPLS).
180.950 Federal agency.
180.955 Indictment.
180.960 Ineligible or ineligibility.
180.965 Legal proceedings.
180.970 Nonprocurement transaction.
180.975 Notice.
180.980 Participant.
180.985 Person.
180.990 Preponderance of the evidence.
180.995 Principal.
180.1000 Respondent.
180.1005 State.
180.1010 Suspending official.
180.1015 Suspension.
180.1020 Voluntary exclusion or voluntarily excluded.
Appendix to Part 180--Covered Transactions
Authority: Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327; E.O.
12549, 3 CFR, 1986 Comp., p.189; E.O. 12689, 3 CFR, 1989 Comp., p.
235.
[[Page 51867]]
Sec. 180.5 What does this part do?
This part provides Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance
for Federal agencies on the governmentwide debarment and suspension
system for nonprocurement programs and activities.
Sec. 180.10 How is this part organized?
This part is organized in two segments.
(a) Sections 180.5 through 180.45 contain general policy direction
for Federal agencies' use of the standards in subparts A through I of
this part.
(b) Subparts A through I of this part contain uniform
governmentwide standards that Federal agencies are to use to specify--
(1) The types of transactions that are covered by the
nonprocurement debarment and suspension system;
(2) The effects of an exclusion under that nonprocurement system,
including reciprocal effects with the governmentwide debarment and
suspension system for procurement;
(3) The criteria and minimum due process to be used in
nonprocurement debarment and suspension actions; and
(4) Related policies and procedures to ensure the effectiveness of
those actions.
Sec. 180.15 To whom does the guidance apply?
The guidance provides OMB guidance only to Federal agencies.
Publication of the guidance in the CFR does not change its nature--it
is guidance and not regulation. Federal agencies' implementation of the
guidance governs the rights and responsibilities of other persons
affected by the nonprocurement debarment and suspension system.
Sec. 180.20 What must a Federal agency do to implement these
guidelines?
As required by Section 3 of E.O. 12549, each Federal agency with
nonprocurement programs and activities covered by subparts A through I
of the guidance must issue regulations consistent with those subparts.
Sec. 180.25 What must a Federal agency address in its implementation
of the guidance?
Each Federal agency implementing regulation:
(a) Must establish policies and procedures for that agency's
nonprocurement debarment and suspension programs and activities that
are consistent with the guidance. When adopted by a Federal agency, the
provisions of the guidance has regulatory effect for that agency's
programs and activities.
(b) Must address some matters for which these guidelines give each
Federal agency some discretion. Specifically, the regulation must--
(1) Identify either the Federal agency head or the title of the
designated official who is authorized to grant exceptions under Sec.
180.135 to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction.
(2) State whether the agency includes as covered transactions an
additional tier of contracts awarded under covered nonprocurement
transactions, as permitted under Sec. 180.220(c).
(3) Identify the method(s) an agency official may use, when
entering into a covered transaction with a primary tier participant, to
communicate to the participant the requirements described in Sec.
180.435. Examples of methods are an award term that requires compliance
as a condition of the award; an assurance of compliance obtained at
time of application; or a certification.
(4) State whether the Federal agency's policy is to restrict
participants' collection of certifications to verify that lower-tier
participants are not excluded or disqualified (see Sec. 180.300(b)).
If it is the policy, the regulation needs to require agency officials,
when entering into covered transactions with primary tier participants,
to communicate that policy.
(5) State whether the Federal agency specifies a particular method
that participants must use to communicate compliance requirements to
lower-tier participants, as described in Sec. 180.330(a). If there is
a specified method, the regulation needs to require agency officials,
when entering into covered transactions with primary tier participants,
to communicate that requirement.
(c) May also, at the agency's option:
(1) Identify any specific types of transactions that the Federal
agency includes as ``nonprocurement transactions'' in addition to the
examples provided in Sec. 180.970.
(2) Identify any types of nonprocurement transactions that the
Federal agency exempts from coverage under these guidelines, as
authorized under Sec. 180.330(g)(2).
(3) Identify specific examples of types of individuals who would be
``principals'' under the Federal agency's nonprocurement programs and
transactions, in addition to the types of individuals described at
Sec. 180.995.
(4) Specify the Federal agency's procedures, if any, by which a
respondent may appeal a suspension or debarment decision.
(5) Identify by title the officials designated by the Federal
agency head as debarring officials under Sec. 180.930 or suspending
officials under Sec. 180.1010.
(6) Include a subpart covering disqualifications, as authorized in
Sec. 180.45.
Sec. 180.30 Where does a Federal agency implement these guidelines?
Each Federal agency that participates in the governmentwide
nonprocurement debarment and suspension system must issue a regulation
implementing these guidelines within its chapter in subtitle B of this
title of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Sec. 180.35 By when must a Federal agency implement these guidelines?
Federal agencies must submit proposed regulations to the OMB for
review within nine months of the issuance of these guidelines and issue
final regulations within eighteen months of these guidelines.
Sec. 180.40 How are these guidelines maintained?
The Interagency Committee on Debarment and Suspension established
by section 4 of E.O. 12549 recommends to the OMB any needed revisions
to the guidelines in this part. The OMB publishes proposed changes to
the guidelines in the Federal Register for public comment, considers
comments with the help of the Interagency Committee on Debarment and
Suspension, and issues the final guidelines.
Sec. 180.45 Do these guidelines cover persons who are disqualified,
as well as those who are excluded from nonprocurement transactions?
A Federal agency may add a subpart covering disqualifications to
its regulation implementing these guidelines, but the guidelines in
subparts A through I of this part--
(a) Address disqualified persons only to--
(1) Provide for their inclusion in the EPLS; and
(2) State responsibilities of Federal agencies and participants to
check for disqualified persons before entering into covered
transactions.
(b) Do not specify the--
(1) Transactions for which a disqualified person is ineligible.
Those transactions vary on a case-by-case basis, because they depend on
the language of the specific statute, Executive order or regulation
that caused the disqualification;
(2) Entities to which a disqualification applies; or
(3) Process that a Federal agency uses to disqualify a person.
Unlike exclusion under subparts A through I of this part,
disqualification is frequently not a discretionary action that a
Federal
[[Page 51868]]
agency takes, and may include special procedures.
Subpart A--General
Sec. 180.100 How are subparts A through I organized?
(a) Each subpart contains information related to a broad topic or
specific audience with special responsibilities, as shown in the
following table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In subpart . . . You will find provisions related to . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A........................................... general information about Subparts A through I of this part.
B........................................... the types of transactions that are covered by the Governmentwide
nonprocurement suspension and debarment system.
C........................................... the responsibilities of persons who participate in covered
transactions.
D........................................... the responsibilities of Federal agency officials who are
authorized to enter into covered transactions.
E........................................... the responsibilities of Federal agencies for entering information
into the EPLS
F........................................... the general principles governing suspension, debarment, voluntary
exclusion and settlement.
G........................................... suspension actions.
H........................................... debarment actions.
I........................................... definitions of terms used in this part.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) The following table shows which subparts may be of special
interest to you, depending on who you are:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are . . . See Subpart(s) . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) a participant or principal in a A, B, C and I.
nonprocurement transaction.
(2) a respondent in a suspension A, B, F, G and I.
action.
(3) a respondent in a debarment A, B, F, H and I.
action.
(4) a suspending official.......... A, B, E, F, G and I.
(5) a debarring official........... A, B, D, F, H and I.
(6) an Federal agency official A, B, D, E and I.
authorized to enter into a covered
transaction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 180.105 How is this part written?
(a) This part uses a ``plain language'' format to make it easier
for the general public and business community to use. The section
headings and text, often in the form of questions and answers, must be
read together.
(b) Pronouns used within this part, such as ``I'' and ``you,''
change from subpart to subpart depending on the audience being
addressed.
(c) The ``Covered Transactions'' diagram in the appendix to this
part shows the levels or ``tiers'' at which a Federal agency may
enforce an exclusion.
Sec. 180.110 Do terms in this part have special meanings?
This part uses terms throughout the text that have special meaning.
Those terms are defined in subpart I of this part. For example, three
important terms are--
(a) Exclusion or excluded, which refers only to discretionary
actions taken by a suspending or debarring official under Executive
Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689 or under the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4);
(b) Disqualification or disqualified, which refers to prohibitions
under specific statutes, executive orders (other than Executive Order
12549 and Executive Order 12689), or other authorities.
Disqualifications frequently are not subject to the discretion of a
Federal agency official, may have a different scope than exclusions, or
have special conditions that apply to the disqualification; and
(c) Ineligibility or ineligible, which generally refers to a person
who is either excluded or disqualified.
Sec. 180.115 What do Subparts A through I of this part do?
Subparts A through I of this part provide for reciprocal exclusion
of persons who have been excluded under the Federal Acquisition
Regulation, and provide for the consolidated listing of all persons who
are excluded, or disqualified by statute, executive order or other
legal authority.
Sec. 180.120 Do subparts A through I of this part apply to me?
Portions of subparts A through I of this part (see table at Sec.
180.100(b)) apply to you if you are a--
(a) Person who has been, is, or may reasonably be expected to be, a
participant or principal in a covered transaction;
(b) Respondent (a person against whom a Federal agency has
initiated a debarment or suspension action);
(c) Federal agency debarring or suspending official; or
(d) Federal agency official who is authorized to enter into covered
transactions with non-Federal parties.
Sec. 180.125 What is the purpose of the nonprocurement debarment and
suspension system?
(a) To protect the public interest, the Federal Government ensures
the integrity of Federal programs by conducting business only with
responsible persons.
(b) A Federal agency uses the nonprocurement debarment and
suspension system to exclude from Federal programs persons who are not
presently responsible.
(c) An exclusion is a serious action that a Federal agency may take
only to protect the public interest. A Federal agency may not exclude a
person or commodity for the purposes of punishment.
Sec. 180.130 How does an exclusion restrict a person's involvement in
covered transactions?
With the exceptions stated in Sec. Sec. 180.135, 315, and 420, a
person who is excluded by any Federal agency may not:
(a) Be a participant in a Federal agency transaction that is a
covered transaction; or
[[Page 51869]]
(b) Act as a principal of a person participating in one of those
covered transactions.
Sec. 180.135 May a Federal agency grant an exception to let an
excluded person participate in a covered transaction?
(a) A Federal agency head or designee may grant an exception
permitting an excluded person to participate in a particular covered
transaction. If the agency head or designee grants an exception, the
exception must be in writing and state the reason(s) for deviating from
the governmentwide policy in Executive Order 12549.
(b) An exception granted by one Federal agency for an excluded
person does not extend to the covered transactions of another Federal
agency.
Sec. 180.140 Does an exclusion under the nonprocurement system affect
a person's eligibility for Federal procurement contracts?
If any Federal agency excludes a person under Executive Order 12549
or Executive Order 12689, on or after August 25, 1995, the excluded
person is also ineligible for Federal procurement transactions under
the FAR. Therefore, an exclusion under this part has reciprocal effect
in Federal procurement transactions.
Sec. 180.145 Does an exclusion under the Federal procurement system
affect a person's eligibility to participate in nonprocurement
transactions?
If any Federal agency excludes a person under the FAR on or after
August 25, 1995, the excluded person is also ineligible to participate
in Federal agencies' nonprocurement covered transactions. Therefore, an
exclusion under the FAR has reciprocal effect in Federal nonprocurement
transactions.
Sec. 180.150 Against whom may a Federal agency take an exclusion
action?
Given a cause that justifies an exclusion under this part, a
Federal agency may exclude any person who has been, is, or may
reasonably be expected to be a participant or principal in a covered
transaction.
Sec. 180.155 How do I know if a person is excluded?
Check the Governmentwide Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) to
determine whether a person is excluded. The General Services
Administration (GSA) maintains the EPLS and makes it available, as
detailed in Subpart E of this part. When a Federal agency takes an
action to exclude a person under the nonprocurement or procurement
debarment and suspension system, the agency enters the information
about the excluded person into the EPLS.
Subpart B--Covered Transactions
Sec. 180.200 What is a covered transaction?
A covered transaction is a nonprocurement or procurement
transaction that is subject to the prohibitions of this part. It may be
a transaction at--
(a) The primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person (see
appendix to this part); or
(b) A lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction
and another person.
Sec. 180.205 Why is it important if a particular transaction is a
covered transaction?
The importance of whether a transaction is a covered transaction
depends upon who you are.
(a) As a participant in the transaction, you have the
responsibilities laid out in subpart C of this part. Those include
responsibilities to the person or Federal agency at the next higher
tier from whom you received the transaction, if any. They also include
responsibilities if you subsequently enter into other covered
transactions with persons at the next lower tier.
(b) As a Federal official who enters into a primary tier
transaction, you have the responsibilities laid out in subpart D of
this part.
(c) As an excluded person, you may not be a participant or
principal in the transaction unless--
(1) The person who entered into the transaction with you allows you
to continue your involvement in a transaction that predates your
exclusion, as permitted under Sec. 180.310 or Sec. 180.415; or
(2) A Federal agency official obtains an exception from the agency
head or designee to allow you to be involved in the transaction, as
permitted under Sec. 180.135.
Sec. 180.210 Which nonprocurement transactions are covered
transactions?
All nonprocurement transactions, as defined in Sec. 180.970, are
covered transactions unless listed in the exemptions under Sec.
180.215.
Sec. 180.215 Which nonprocurement transactions are not covered
transactions?
The following types of nonprocurement transactions are not covered
transactions:
(a) A direct award to--
(1) A foreign government or foreign governmental entity;
(2) A public international organization;
(3) An entity owned (in whole or in part) or controlled by a
foreign government; or
(4) Any other entity consisting wholly or partially of one or more
foreign governments or foreign governmental entities.
(b) A benefit to an individual as a personal entitlement without
regard to the individual's present responsibility (but benefits
received in an individual's business capacity are not excepted). For
example, if a person receives social security benefits under the
Supplemental Security Income provisions of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. 1301 et seq., those benefits are not covered transactions and,
therefore, are not affected if the person is excluded.
(c) Federal employment.
(d) A transaction that a Federal agency needs to respond to a
national or agency-recognized emergency or disaster.
(e) A permit, license, certificate or similar instrument issued as
a means to regulate public health, safety or the environment, unless a
Federal agency specifically designates it to be a covered transaction.
(f) An incidental benefit that results from ordinary governmental
operations.
(g) Any other transaction if--
(1) The application of an exclusion to the transaction is
prohibited by law; or
(2) A Federal agency's regulation exempts it from coverage under
this part.
Sec. 180.220 Are any procurement contracts included as covered
transactions?
(a) Covered transactions under this part--
(1) Do not include any procurement contracts awarded directly by a
Federal agency; but
(2) Do include some procurement contracts awarded by non-Federal
participants in nonprocurement covered transactions.
(b) Specifically, a contract for goods or services is a covered
transaction if any of the following applies:
(1) The contract is awarded by a participant in a nonprocurement
transaction that is covered under Sec. 180.210, and the amount of the
contract is expected to equal or exceed $25,000.
(2) The contract requires the consent of an official of a Federal
agency. In that case, the contract, regardless of the amount, always is
a covered transaction, and it does not matter who awarded it. For
example, it could be a subcontract awarded by a contractor at a tier
below a nonprocurement transaction, as shown in the appendix to this
part.
(3) The contract is for Federally-required audit services.
(c) A subcontract also is a covered transaction if,--
(1) It is awarded by a participant in a procurement transaction
under a
[[Page 51870]]
nonprocurement transaction of a Federal agency that extends the
coverage of paragraph (b)(1) of this section to any additional tier of
contracts (see the diagram in the appendix to this part showing that
optional lower tier coverage); and
(2) The value of the subcontract exceeds or is expected to exceed
$25,000.
Sec. 180.225 How do I know if a transaction in which I may
participate is a covered transaction?
As a participant in a transaction, you will know that it is a
covered transaction because the Federal agency regulations governing
the transaction, the appropriate Federal agency official or participant
at the next higher tier who enters into the transaction with you, will
tell you that you must comply with applicable portions of this part.
Subpart C--Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions
Doing Business With Other Persons
Sec. 180.300 What must I do before I enter into a covered transaction
with another person at the next lower tier?
When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at
the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you
intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by:
(a) Checking the EPLS; or
(b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by the
Federal agency responsible for the transaction; or
(c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with
that person.
Sec. 180.305 May I enter into a covered transaction with an excluded
or disqualified person?
(a) You as a participant may not enter into a covered transaction
with an excluded person, unless the Federal agency responsible for the
transaction grants an exception under Sec. 180.135.
(b) You may not enter into any transaction with a person who is
disqualified from that transaction, unless you have obtained an
exception under the disqualifying statute, Executive order, or
regulation.
Sec. 180.310 What must I do if a Federal agency excludes a person
with whom I am already doing business in a covered transaction?
(a) You as a participant may continue covered transactions with an
excluded person if the transactions were in existence when the agency
excluded the person. However, you are not required to continue the
transactions, and you may consider termination. You should make a
decision about whether to terminate and the type of termination action,
if any, only after a thorough review to ensure that the action is
proper and appropriate.
(b) You may not renew or extend covered transactions (other than
no-cost time extensions) with any excluded person, unless the Federal
agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under Sec.
180.135.
Sec. 180.315 May I use the services of an excluded person as a
principal under a covered transaction?
(a) You as a participant may continue to use the services of an
excluded person as a principal under a covered transaction if you were
using the services of that person in the transaction before the person
was excluded. However, you are not required to continue using that
person's services as a principal. You should make a decision about
whether to discontinue that person's services only after a thorough
review to ensure that the action is proper and appropriate.
(b) You may not begin to use the services of an excluded person as
a principal under a covered transaction unless the Federal agency
responsible for the transaction grants an exception under Sec.
180.135.
Sec. 180.320 Must I verify that principals of my covered transactions
are eligible to participate?
Yes, you as a participant are responsible for determining whether
any of your principals of your covered transactions is excluded or
disqualified from participating in the transaction.
You may decide the method and frequency by which you do so. You
may, but you are not required to, check the EPLS.
Sec. 180.325 What happens if I do business with an excluded person in
a covered transaction?
If as a participant you knowingly do business with an excluded
person, the Federal agency responsible for your transaction may
disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work
order, debar or suspend you, or take other remedies as appropriate.
Sec. 180.330 What requirements must I pass down to persons at lower
tiers with whom I intend to do business?
Before entering into a covered transaction with a participant at
the next lower tier, you must require that participant to--
(a) Comply with this subpart as a condition of participation in the
transaction. You may do so using any method(s), unless the regulation
of the Federal agency responsible for the transaction requires you to
use specific methods.
(b) Pass the requirement to comply with this subpart to each person
with whom the participant enters into a covered transaction at the next
lower tier.
Disclosing Information--Primary Tier Participants
Sec. 180.335 What information must I provide before entering into a
covered transaction with a Federal agency?
Before you enter into a covered transaction at the primary tier,
you as the participant must notify the Federal agency office that is
entering into the transaction with you, if you know that you or any of
the principals for that covered transaction:
(a) Are presently excluded or disqualified;
(b) Have been convicted within the preceding three years of any of
the offenses listed in Sec. 180.800(a) or had a civil judgment
rendered against you for one of those offenses within that time period;
(c) Are presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly
charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with
commission of any of the offenses listed in Sec. 180.800(a); or
(d) Have had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or
local) terminated within the preceding three years for cause or
default.
Sec. 180.340 If I disclose unfavorable information required under
Sec. 180.335, will I be prevented from participating in the
transaction?
As a primary tier participant, your disclosure of unfavorable
information about yourself or a principal under Sec. 180.335 will not
necessarily cause a Federal agency to deny your participation in the
covered transaction. The agency will consider the information when it
determines whether to enter into the covered transaction. The agency
will also consider any additional information or explanation that you
elect to submit with the disclosed information.
Sec. 180.345 What happens if I fail to disclose information required
under Sec. 180.335?
If a Federal agency later determines that you failed to disclose
information under Sec. 180.335 that you knew at the time you entered
into the covered transaction, the agency may--
(a) Terminate the transaction for material failure to comply with
the terms and conditions of the transaction; or
(b) Pursue any other available remedies, including suspension and
debarment.
[[Page 51871]]
Sec. 180.350 What must I do if I learn of information required under
Sec. 180.335 after entering into a covered transaction with a Federal
agency?
At any time after you enter into a covered transaction, you must
give immediate written notice to the Federal agency office with which
you entered into the transaction if you learn either that--
(a) You failed to disclose information earlier, as required by
Sec. 180.335; or
(b) Due to changed circumstances, you or any of the principals for
the transaction now meet any of the criteria in Sec. 180.335.
Disclosing Information--Lower Tier Participants
Sec. 180.355 What information must I provide to a higher tier
participant before entering into a covered transaction with that
participant?
Before you enter into a covered transaction with a person at the
next higher tier, you as a lower tier participant must notify that
person if you know that you or any of the principals are presently
excluded or disqualified.
Sec. 180.360 What happens if I fail to disclose information required
under Sec. 180.355?
If a Federal agency later determines that you failed to tell the
person at the higher tier that you were excluded or disqualified at the
time you entered into the covered transaction with that person, the
agency may pursue any available remedies, including suspension and
debarment.
Sec. 180.365 What must I do if I learn of information required under
Sec. 180.355 after entering into a covered transaction with a higher
tier participant?
At any time after you enter into a lower tier covered transaction
with a person at a higher tier, you must provide immediate written
notice to that person if you learn either that--
(a) You failed to disclose information earlier, as required by
Sec. 180.355; or
(b) Due to changed circumstances, you or any of the principals for
the transaction now meet any of the criteria in Sec. 180.355.
Subpart D--Responsibilities of Federal Agency Officials Regarding
Transactions
Sec. 180.400 May I enter into a transaction with an excluded or
disqualified person?
(a) You as a Federal agency official may not enter into a covered
transaction with an excluded person unless you obtain an exception
under Sec. 180.135.
(b) You may not enter into any transaction with a person who is
disqualified from that transaction, unless you obtain a waiver or
exception under the statute, Executive order, or regulation that is the
basis for the person's disqualification.
Sec. 180.405 May I enter into a covered transaction with a
participant if a principal of the transaction is excluded?
As a Federal agency official, you may not enter into a covered
transaction with a participant if you know that a principal of the
transaction is excluded, unless you obtain an exception under Sec.
180.135.
Sec. 180.410 May I approve a participant's use of the services of an
excluded person?
After entering into a covered transaction with a participant, you
as a Federal agency official may not approve a participant's use of an
excluded person as a principal under that transaction, unless you
obtain an exception under Sec. 180.135.
Sec. 180.415 What must I do if a Federal agency excludes the
participant or a principal after I enter into a covered transaction?
(a) You as a Federal agency official may continue covered
transactions with an excluded person, or under which an excluded person
is a principal, if the transactions were in existence when the person
was excluded. You are not required to continue the transactions,
however, and you may consider termination. You should make a decision
about whether to terminate and the type of termination action, if any,
only after a thorough review to ensure that the action is proper.
(b) You may not renew or extend covered transactions (other than
no-cost time extensions) with any excluded person, or under which an
excluded person is a principal, unless you obtain an exception under
Sec. 180.135.
Sec. 180.420 May I approve a transaction with an excluded or
disqualified person at a lower tier?
If a transaction at a lower tier is subject to your approval, you
as a Federal agency official may not approve--
(a) A covered transaction with a person who is currently excluded,
unless you obtain an exception under Sec. 180.135; or
(b) A transaction with a person who is disqualified from that
transaction, unless you obtain a waiver or exception under the statute,
Executive order, or regulation that is the basis for the person's
disqualification.
Sec. 180.425 When do I check to see if a person is excluded or
disqualified?
As a Federal agency official, you must check to see if a person is
excluded or disqualified before you--
(a) Enter into a primary tier covered transaction;
(b) Approve a principal in a primary tier covered transaction;
(c) Approve a lower tier participant if your agency's approval of
the lower tier participant is required; or
(d) Approve a principal in connection with a lower tier transaction
if your agency's approval of the principal is required.
Sec. 180.430 How do I check to see if a person is excluded or
disqualified?
You check to see if a person is excluded or disqualified in two
ways:
(a) You as a Federal agency official must check the EPLS when you
take any action listed in Sec. 180.425.
(b) You must review information that a participant gives you, as
required by Sec. 180.335, about its status or the status of the
principals of a transaction.
Sec. 180.435 What must I require of a primary tier participant?
You as a Federal agency official must require each participant in a
primary tier covered transaction to--
(a) Comply with subpart C of this part as a condition of
participation in the transaction; and
(b) Communicate the requirement to comply with Subpart C of this
part to persons at the next lower tier with whom the primary tier
participant enters into covered transactions.
Sec. 180.440 What action may I take if a primary tier participant
knowingly does business with an excluded or disqualified person?
If a participant knowingly does business with an excluded or
disqualified person, you as a Federal agency official may refer the
matter for suspension and debarment consideration. You may also
disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work
order, or take any other appropriate remedy.
Sec. 180.445 What action may I take if a primary tier participant
fails to disclose the information required under Sec. 180.335?
If you as a Federal agency official determine that a participant
failed to disclose information, as required by Sec. 180.335, at the
time it entered into a covered transaction with you, you may--
(a) Terminate the transaction for material failure to comply with
the terms and conditions of the transaction; or
[[Page 51872]]
(b) Pursue any other available remedies, including suspension and
debarment.
Sec. 180.450 What action may I take if a lower tier participant fails
to disclose the information required under Sec. 180.355 to the next
higher tier?
If you as a Federal agency official determine that a lower tier
participant failed to disclose information, as required by Sec.
180.355, at the time it entered into a covered transaction with a
participant at the next higher tier, you may pursue any remedies
available to you, including the initiation of a suspension or debarment
action.
Subpart E--Excluded Parties List System
Sec. 180.500 What is the purpose of the Excluded Parties List System
(EPLS)?
The EPLS is a widely available source of the most current
information about persons who are excluded or disqualified from covered
transactions.
Sec. 180.505 Who uses the EPLS?
(a) Federal agency officials use the EPLS to determine whether to
enter into a transaction with a person, as required under Sec.
180.430.
(b) Participants also may, but are not required to, use the EPLS to
determine if--
(1) Principals of their transactions are excluded or disqualified,
as required under Sec. 180.320; or
(2) Persons with whom they are entering into covered transactions
at the next lower tier are excluded or disqualified.
(c) The EPLS is available to the general public.
Sec. 180.510 Who maintains the EPLS?
The General Services Administration (GSA) maintains the EPLS. When
a Federal agency takes an action to exclude a person under the
nonprocurement or procurement debarment and suspension system, the
agency enters the information about the excluded person into the EPLS.
Sec. 180.515 What specific information is in the EPLS?
(a) At a minimum, the EPLS indicates--
(1) The full name (where available) and address of each excluded
and disqualified person, in alphabetical order, with cross references
if more than one name is involved in a single action;
(2) The type of action;
(3) The cause for the action;
(4) The scope of the action;
(5) Any termination date for the action;
(6) The Federal agency and name and telephone number of the agency
point of contact for the action; and
(7) The Dun and Bradstreet Number (DUNS), or other similar code
approved by the GSA, of the excluded or disqualified person, if
available.
(b)(1) The database for the EPLS includes a field for the Taxpayer
Identification Number (TIN) (the social security number (SSN) for an
individual) of an excluded or disqualified person.
(2) Agencies disclose the SSN of an individual to verify the
identity of an individual, only if permitted under the Privacy Act of
1974 and, if appropriate, the Computer Matching and Privacy Protection
Act of 1988, as codified in 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
Sec. 180.520 Who places the information into the EPLS?
Federal agency officials who take actions to exclude persons under
this part or officials who are responsible for identifying disqualified
persons must enter the following information about those persons into
the EPLS:
(a) Information required by Sec. 180.515(a);
(b) The Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) of the excluded or
disqualified person, including the social security number (SSN) for an
individual, if the number is available and may be disclosed under law;
(c) Information about an excluded or disqualified person, generally
within five working days, after--
(1) Taking an exclusion action;
(2) Modifying or rescinding an exclusion action;
(3) Finding that a person is disqualified; or
(4) Finding that there has been a change in the status of a person
who is listed as disqualified.
Sec. 180.525 Whom do I ask if I have questions about a person in the
EPLS?
If you have questions about a listed person in the EPLS, ask the
point of contact for the Federal agency that placed the person's name
into the EPLS. You may find the agency point of contact from the EPLS.
Sec. 180.530 Where can I find the EPLS?
You may access the EPLS through the Internet, currently at https://
epls.arnet.gov or https://www.epls.gov.
Subpart F--General Principles Relating to Suspension and Debarment
Actions
Sec. 180.600 How do suspension and debarment actions start?
When Federal agency officials receive information from any source
concerning a cause for suspension or debarment, they will promptly
report it and the agency will investigate. The officials refer the
question of whether to suspend or debar you to their suspending or
debarring official for consideration, if appropriate.
Sec. 180.605 How does suspension differ from debarment?
Suspension differs from debarment in that--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A suspending official . . . A debarring official . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Imposes suspension as a temporary Imposes debarment for a
status of in eligibility for specified period as a final
procurement and nonprocurement determination that a person is
transactions, pending completion of an not presently responsible.
investigation or legal proceedings.
(b) Must--
(1) Have adequate evidence that