Notice of Opportunity To Comment on Model Safety Evaluation on Elimination of Typical License Condition Requiring Reporting of Violations of Section 2.C of Operating License Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process, 51098-51100 [E5-4710]
Download as PDF
51098
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2005 / Notices
and image files of NRC’s public
documents. The following references are
available for inspection at NRC’s Public
Electronic Reading Room at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
ADAMS accession numbers are located
in parentheses following the reference.
1. Leamon, Christopher P., Ph.D., Radiation
Safety Officer, Endocyte Incorporated, letter
to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, May
26, 2005 (ML052340684).
2. Decommissioning Report (Final Status
Survey Report), 1205 Kent Avenue, West
Lafayette, Indiana, May 26, 2005
(ML052340684).
3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
‘‘Environmental Review Guidance for
Licensing Actions Associated with NMSS
Programs,’’ NUREG–1748, August 2003.
4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
‘‘Generic Environmental Impact Statement in
Support of Rulemaking on Radiological
Criteria for License Termination of NRCLicensed Nuclear Facilities,’’ NUREG–1496,
August 1994.
5. NRC, NUREG–1757, ‘‘Consolidated
NMSS Decommissioning Guidance,’’
Volumes 1–3, September 2003.
If you do not have access to ADAMS
or if there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
the NRC Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at (800) 397–4209, (301)
415–4737 or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at the NRC’s PDR, O 1 F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee.
Dated at Lisle, Illinois, this 22nd day of
August, 2005.
James L. Cameron,
Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of
Nuclear Materials Safety, RIII.
[FR Doc. E5–4709 Filed 8–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Meeting of the
Interagency Steering Committee on
Radiation Standards
The meeting will be held from 1
p.m. to 5 p.m. on Tuesday, September
27, 2005.
DATES:
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission and Environmental
Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCIES:
15:17 Aug 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
The meeting will be held in
the NRC auditorium, at Two White Flint
North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852.
ADDRESSES:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) will host a meeting
of the Interagency Steering Committee
on Radiation Standards (ISCORS) on
September, 27, 2005, in Rockville,
Maryland. The purpose of ISCORS is to
foster early resolution and coordination
VerDate Aug<18>2005
of regulatory issues associated with
radiation standards. Agencies
represented on ISCORS include the
NRC, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, U.S. Department of Energy,
U.S. Department of Defense, U.S.
Department of Transportation, the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration of the U.S. Department
of Labor, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security. Representatives
from the Office of Science and
Technology Policy, Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board, Office of
Management and Budget, State
Department, Illinois Bureau of Radiation
Safety, and Pennsylvania Bureau of
Radiation Protection may be observers
at meetings. The objectives of ISCORS
are to: (1) Facilitate a consensus on
allowable levels of radiation risk to the
public and workers; (2) promote
consistent and scientifically sound risk
assessment and risk management
approaches in setting and implementing
standards for occupational and public
protection from ionizing radiation; (3)
promote completeness and coherence of
Federal standards for radiation
protection; and (4) identify interagency
radiation protection issues and
coordinate their resolution. ISCORS
meetings include presentations by the
chairs of the subcommittees and
discussions of current radiation
protection issues. Committee meetings
normally involve pre-decisional intragovernmental discussions and, as such,
are normally not open for observation
by members of the public or media.
ISCORS has adopted the practice of
opening one of its meetings each year to
all interested members of the public.
There will be time on the agenda for
members of the public to provide
comments. The final agenda for the
September meeting will be posted on
the ISCORS Web site, https://
www.iscors.org, shortly before the
meeting. Participants are encouraged to
(1) notify the contact below for preregistration and (2) allow sufficient time
for security screening prior to accessing
the meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Kyung Hee (Jessica) Shin, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555, telephone 301–
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
415–8117; fax 301–415–5397; e-mail
KXS1@NRC.GOV.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Visitor
parking around the NRC building is
limited; however, the NRC auditorium
is located adjacent to the White Flint
Metro Station on the Red Line.
Dated at Rockville, MD, this 23rd day of
August, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Scott Flanders,
Deputy Director, Environmental and
Performance Assessment Directorate,
Division of Waste Management and
Environmental Protection, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E5–4706 Filed 8–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Notice of Opportunity To Comment on
Model Safety Evaluation on Elimination
of Typical License Condition Requiring
Reporting of Violations of Section 2.C
of Operating License Using the
Consolidated Line Item Improvement
Process
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Request for comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the staff of the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has prepared a
model safety evaluation (SE) relating to
the elimination of the license condition
involving reporting of violations of
other requirements (typically in License
Condition 2.C) in the operating license
of some commercial nuclear power
plants. The NRC staff has also prepared
a model no significant hazards
consideration (NSHC) determination
relating to this matter. The purpose of
these models is to permit the NRC to
efficiently process amendments that
propose to delete the reporting
requirement. Licensees of nuclear power
reactors to which the models apply
could then request amendments,
confirming the applicability of the SE
and NSHC determination to its reactors.
The NRC staff is requesting comment on
the model SE and model NSHC
determination prior to announcing their
availability for referencing in license
amendment applications.
DATES: The comment period expires 30
days from date of publication in the
Federal Register. Comments received
after this date will be considered if it is
practical to do so, but the Commission
is able to ensure consideration only for
comments received on or before this
date.
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2005 / Notices
51099
ADDRESSES:
Applicability
Proposed Model Safety Evaluation
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation,
Consolidated Line Item Improvement,
Elimination of License Condition
Requiring Reports of Violations of
License Condition [2.C] in Facility
Operating License
Background
This proposal to eliminate the
reporting of violations of specific
requirements (typically in License
Condition 2.C) of facility operating
licenses is applicable to any licensee
that has such a provision in its facility
operating license. The NRC staff notes
that many operating licenses do not
contain the requirement because it was
never added or was removed by a
license amendment before issuance of
this notice. The CLIIP also addresses
similar requirements if they exist in the
Administrative Section of Technical
Specifications. The CLIIP does not
address reporting requirements
contained in operating licenses other
than those specifically involving reports
of violations of other requirements
(typically in License Condition 2.C) of
the facility operating license or
requirements that restate the need to
submit reports in accordance with 10
CFR 50.72, ‘‘Immediate notification
requirements for operating nuclear
power reactors,’’ and 10 CFR 50.73,
‘‘Licensee event report system.’’
Comments may be
submitted either electronically or via
U.S. mail.
Submit written comments to: Chief,
Rules and Directives Branch, Division of
Administrative Services, Office of
Administration, Mail Stop T–6–D59,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
Hand deliver comments to 11545
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland,
between 7:45 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on
Federal workdays.
Copies of comments received may be
examined at the NRC’s Public Document
Room, located at One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland.
Comments may be submitted by
electronic mail to CLIIP@nrc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Reckley, Mail Stop: O–7D1,
Division of Licensing Project
Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, telephone 301–415–1323.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Issue Summary 2000–06,
‘‘Consolidated Line Item Improvement
Process for Adopting Standard
Technical Specification Changes for
Power Reactors,’’ was issued on March
20, 2000. The consolidated line item
improvement process (CLIIP) is
intended to improve the efficiency of
NRC licensing processes. The CLIIP
includes an opportunity for the public
to comment on a proposed change to
operating licenses, including the
Technical Specifications, after a
preliminary assessment by the NRC staff
and a finding that the change will likely
be offered for adoption by licensees.
This notice solicits comment on a
proposed change that deletes a
requirement for licensees to report
violations of other requirements
(typically in License Condition 2.C) of
its facility’s operating license. The CLIIP
directs the NRC staff to evaluate any
comments received for a proposed
change and to either reconsider the
change or announce the availability of
the change for adoption by licensees.
Licensees opting to apply for this
proposed license amendment change are
responsible for reviewing the staff’s
evaluation, referencing the applicable
technical justifications, and providing
any necessary plant-specific
information. Each amendment
application made in response to the
notice of availability will be processed
and noticed in accordance with
applicable rules and NRC procedures.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:17 Aug 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Public Notices
This notice requests comments from
interested members of the public within
30 days of the date of publication in the
Federal Register. After evaluating the
comments received as a result of this
notice, the NRC staff will either
reconsider the proposed change or
announce the availability of the change
in a subsequent notice (perhaps with
some changes to the safety evaluation or
the proposed NSHC determination as a
result of public comments). If the NRC
staff announces the availability of the
change, licensees wishing to adopt the
change must submit an application in
accordance with applicable rules and
other regulatory requirements. For each
application, the NRC staff will publish
a notice of consideration of issuance of
amendment to facility operating
licenses, a proposed NSHC
determination, and a notice of
opportunity for a hearing. The NRC staff
will also publish a notice of issuance of
an amendment for each plant that
receives the requested change.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1.0
Introduction
By application dated [ ], [LICENSEE]
(the licensee), requested an amendment
to the Facility Operating License for
[PLANT]. The proposed amendment
would delete Section 2[X] of the Facility
Operating License, which requires
reporting of violations of the
requirements in Section 2[C] of the
Facility Operating License.
2.0
Regulatory Evaluation
A section or condition was included
in the facility operating licenses issued
to some nuclear power plants requiring
the licensee to make reports to the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
regarding violations of other sections of
the operating license (typically Section
2.C). A typical license condition reads
as follows:
Except as otherwise provided in this
license and its appendices, the Licensee
shall report any violations of the
requirements contained in Section 2.C
of this license in the following manner:
initial notification shall be made within
24 hours to the NRC Operations Center
via the Emergency Notification System
with written followup within thirty
days in accordance with the procedures
described in 10 CFR 50.73 (Licensee
event report system).
In addition to the information
provided to support licensing decisions,
the NRC obtains information about plant
operation, licensee programs, and other
matters using a combination of
inspections and reporting requirements.
Routine or scheduled reports that are
required to be submitted to the NRC are
defined in the related regulations,
specific license condition, technical
specification, or an NRC-approved
program document. The reporting of
emergencies, unplanned events or
conditions, and other special cases may
also be addressed within such
documents by the inclusion of reporting
thresholds and are also the focus of the
reporting requirements in 10 CFR 50.72,
‘‘Immediate notification requirements
for operating nuclear power reactors,’’
and 10 CFR 50.73, ‘‘Licensee event
report system.’’ Changes to the reporting
regulations in 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73
became effective in January 2001 (see
Federal Register notice on October 25,
2000 (65 FR 63769) and included
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
51100
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2005 / Notices
extending the allowable reporting times
for licensee event reports (LERs) from 30
days to 60 days.
[Optional: The Administrative Section of the
Technical Specifications (TS) for [PLANT]
also includes a reporting requirement that
duplicates the requirements in 10 CFR 50.72
and 10 CFR 50.73, but which does not reflect
subsequent changes in those regulations such
as requiring LERs within 60 days instead of
30 days.]
3.0 Technical Evaluation
Section 2.[X] of the Facility Operating
License requires the licensee to report
any violations of the requirements of
Section 2[C] of the Facility Operating
License and defines the method and
allowable time periods for such reports.
The reporting threshold (i.e., a
violation) for some of the conditions
included in Section 2.[C] of the Facility
Operating License duplicates those
defined in 10 CFR 50.72 and 10 CFR
50.73. However, the requirements in the
Facility Operating License may have
different deadlines than those defined
in the regulations (following a rule
change in 2001). This difference in
reporting requirements has led to
variations in reporting since many
facility operating licenses do not
contain the subject condition. For those
licensees with a 30-day reporting
requirement in the Facility Operating
License, the condition has decreased the
benefits of the rulemaking. For those
cases where the current Facility
Operating License requirement to report
violations is also reportable in
accordance with the regulations defined
in 10 CFR 50.72 and 10 CFR 50.73, the
NRC staff finds that the regulations
adequately address this issue and the
elimination of the duplicative
requirement in the Facility Operating
License is acceptable.
Some of the conditions addressed in
Section 2.[C] of the Facility Operating
License may address the maintenance of
particular programs, administrative
requirements, or other matters where a
violation of the requirement would not
result in a report to the NRC in
accordance with 10 CFR 50.72 or 10
CFR 50.73. In most cases, there are
requirements for reports to the NRC
related to these conditions in other
regulations, the specific license
condition or technical specification, or
an NRC-approved program document. In
other cases, there are reports to other
agencies or news releases that would
prompt a report to the NRC (in
accordance with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(xi)).
The NRC staff also assessed violations of
administrative requirements that could
be reportable under the current License
Condition but that may not have a
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:17 Aug 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
dupicative requirement in a regulation
or other regulatory requirement. The
NRC staff finds that the requirements to
report such problems within 24 hours
with written reports to follow using the
LER process is not needed. The NRC
staff is confident that the information
related to such violations that is actually
important to the NRC’s regulatory
functions would come to light in a time
frame comparable to the 60-day LER
requirements. The information would
become available to the appropriate
NRC staff through the inspection
program, updates to program
documents, resultant licensing actions,
public announcements, or some other
reliable mechanism.
The NRC staff finds that the
elimination of Section 2.[X] of the
Facility Operating License will not
result in a loss of information to the
NRC that would adversely affect either
its goal to protect public health and
safety or its ability to carry out its
various other regulatory responsibilities.
[Optional: The reporting requirement defined
in TS [5.x.x] for [PLANT] requires a report to
the NRC when [REPORT REQUIREMENT].
This requirement duplicates the
requirements in 10 CFR 50.72 and 10 CFR
50.73, but does not reflect subsequent
changes in those regulations such as
requiring LERs within 60 days instead of 30
days. The NRC staff finds the elimination of
the TS requirement acceptable since the
required reports are defined in an established
NRC regulation that is also applicable to this
licensee.]
4.0 State Consultation
In accordance with the Commission’s
regulations, the [ ] State official was
notified of the proposed issuance of the
amendment. The State official had no
comments.
5.0 Environmental Consideration
The amendment changes
recordkeeping, reporting, or
administrative procedures or
requirements. Accordingly, the
amendment meets the eligibility criteria
for categorical exclusion set forth in 10
CFR 51.22(c)(10). Pursuant to 10 CFR
51.22(b), no environmental impact
statement or environmental assessment
need be prepared in connection with the
issuance of the amendment.
6.0 Conclusion
The Commission has concluded,
based on the considerations discussed
above, that (1) there is reasonable
assurance that the health and safety of
the public will not be endangered by
operation in the proposed manner, (2)
such activities will be conducted in
compliance with the Commission’s
regulations, and (3) the issuance of the
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
amendment will not be inimical to the
common defense and security or to the
health and safety of the public.
Proposed No Significant Hazards
Consideration Determination
Description of Amendment Request:
The proposed amendment would delete
Section 2.[X] of the Facility Operating
License, which requires reporting of
violations of the requirements in
Section 2.[C] of the Facility Operating
License. [The proposed amendment
would also delete a reporting
requirement in Technical Specifications
that is duplicative of NRC regulations.]
Basis for proposed no significant
hazards consideration determination:
As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), an
analysis of the issue of no significant
hazards consideration is presented
below:
1. Does the change involve a significant
increase in the probability or consequences
of an accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed change involves the deletion
of a reporting requirement. The change does
not affect plant equipment or operating
practices and therefore does not significantly
increase the probability or consequences of
an accident previously evaluated.
2. Does the change create the possibility of
a new or different kind of accident from any
accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed change is administrative in
that it deletes a reporting requirement. The
change does not add new plant equipment,
change existing plant equipment, or affect the
operating practices of the facility. Therefore,
the change does not create the possibility of
a new or different kind of accident from any
accident previously evaluated.
3. Does the proposed change involve a
significant reduction in a margin of safety?
Response: No.
The proposed change deletes a reporting
requirement. The change does not affect
plant equipment or operating practices and
therefore does not involve a significant
reduction in a margin of safety.
Based on the above, the NRC staff
proposes that the change presents no
significant hazards consideration under
the standards set forth in 10 CFR
50.92(c).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd of
August, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
William D. Reckley,
Senior Project Manager, Section 1, Project
Directorate IV, Division of Licensing Project
Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E5–4710 Filed 8–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 166 (Monday, August 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51098-51100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4710]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Notice of Opportunity To Comment on Model Safety Evaluation on
Elimination of Typical License Condition Requiring Reporting of
Violations of Section 2.C of Operating License Using the Consolidated
Line Item Improvement Process
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the staff of the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) has prepared a model safety evaluation (SE)
relating to the elimination of the license condition involving
reporting of violations of other requirements (typically in License
Condition 2.C) in the operating license of some commercial nuclear
power plants. The NRC staff has also prepared a model no significant
hazards consideration (NSHC) determination relating to this matter. The
purpose of these models is to permit the NRC to efficiently process
amendments that propose to delete the reporting requirement. Licensees
of nuclear power reactors to which the models apply could then request
amendments, confirming the applicability of the SE and NSHC
determination to its reactors. The NRC staff is requesting comment on
the model SE and model NSHC determination prior to announcing their
availability for referencing in license amendment applications.
DATES: The comment period expires 30 days from date of publication in
the Federal Register. Comments received after this date will be
considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to
ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date.
[[Page 51099]]
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted either electronically or via U.S.
mail.
Submit written comments to: Chief, Rules and Directives Branch,
Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration, Mail
Stop T-6-D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001.
Hand deliver comments to 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland,
between 7:45 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays.
Copies of comments received may be examined at the NRC's Public
Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike
(first floor), Rockville, Maryland.
Comments may be submitted by electronic mail to CLIIP@nrc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Reckley, Mail Stop: O-7D1,
Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001, telephone 301-415-1323.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Regulatory Issue Summary 2000-06, ``Consolidated Line Item
Improvement Process for Adopting Standard Technical Specification
Changes for Power Reactors,'' was issued on March 20, 2000. The
consolidated line item improvement process (CLIIP) is intended to
improve the efficiency of NRC licensing processes. The CLIIP includes
an opportunity for the public to comment on a proposed change to
operating licenses, including the Technical Specifications, after a
preliminary assessment by the NRC staff and a finding that the change
will likely be offered for adoption by licensees. This notice solicits
comment on a proposed change that deletes a requirement for licensees
to report violations of other requirements (typically in License
Condition 2.C) of its facility's operating license. The CLIIP directs
the NRC staff to evaluate any comments received for a proposed change
and to either reconsider the change or announce the availability of the
change for adoption by licensees. Licensees opting to apply for this
proposed license amendment change are responsible for reviewing the
staff's evaluation, referencing the applicable technical
justifications, and providing any necessary plant-specific information.
Each amendment application made in response to the notice of
availability will be processed and noticed in accordance with
applicable rules and NRC procedures.
Applicability
This proposal to eliminate the reporting of violations of specific
requirements (typically in License Condition 2.C) of facility operating
licenses is applicable to any licensee that has such a provision in its
facility operating license. The NRC staff notes that many operating
licenses do not contain the requirement because it was never added or
was removed by a license amendment before issuance of this notice. The
CLIIP also addresses similar requirements if they exist in the
Administrative Section of Technical Specifications. The CLIIP does not
address reporting requirements contained in operating licenses other
than those specifically involving reports of violations of other
requirements (typically in License Condition 2.C) of the facility
operating license or requirements that restate the need to submit
reports in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72, ``Immediate notification
requirements for operating nuclear power reactors,'' and 10 CFR 50.73,
``Licensee event report system.''
Public Notices
This notice requests comments from interested members of the public
within 30 days of the date of publication in the Federal Register.
After evaluating the comments received as a result of this notice, the
NRC staff will either reconsider the proposed change or announce the
availability of the change in a subsequent notice (perhaps with some
changes to the safety evaluation or the proposed NSHC determination as
a result of public comments). If the NRC staff announces the
availability of the change, licensees wishing to adopt the change must
submit an application in accordance with applicable rules and other
regulatory requirements. For each application, the NRC staff will
publish a notice of consideration of issuance of amendment to facility
operating licenses, a proposed NSHC determination, and a notice of
opportunity for a hearing. The NRC staff will also publish a notice of
issuance of an amendment for each plant that receives the requested
change.
Proposed Model Safety Evaluation
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, Consolidated Line Item Improvement, Elimination of License
Condition Requiring Reports of Violations of License Condition [2.C] in
Facility Operating License
1.0 Introduction
By application dated [ ], [LICENSEE] (the licensee), requested an
amendment to the Facility Operating License for [PLANT]. The proposed
amendment would delete Section 2[X] of the Facility Operating License,
which requires reporting of violations of the requirements in Section
2[C] of the Facility Operating License.
2.0 Regulatory Evaluation
A section or condition was included in the facility operating
licenses issued to some nuclear power plants requiring the licensee to
make reports to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regarding
violations of other sections of the operating license (typically
Section 2.C). A typical license condition reads as follows:
Except as otherwise provided in this license and its appendices,
the Licensee shall report any violations of the requirements contained
in Section 2.C of this license in the following manner: initial
notification shall be made within 24 hours to the NRC Operations Center
via the Emergency Notification System with written followup within
thirty days in accordance with the procedures described in 10 CFR 50.73
(Licensee event report system).
In addition to the information provided to support licensing
decisions, the NRC obtains information about plant operation, licensee
programs, and other matters using a combination of inspections and
reporting requirements. Routine or scheduled reports that are required
to be submitted to the NRC are defined in the related regulations,
specific license condition, technical specification, or an NRC-approved
program document. The reporting of emergencies, unplanned events or
conditions, and other special cases may also be addressed within such
documents by the inclusion of reporting thresholds and are also the
focus of the reporting requirements in 10 CFR 50.72, ``Immediate
notification requirements for operating nuclear power reactors,'' and
10 CFR 50.73, ``Licensee event report system.'' Changes to the
reporting regulations in 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73 became effective in
January 2001 (see Federal Register notice on October 25, 2000 (65 FR
63769) and included
[[Page 51100]]
extending the allowable reporting times for licensee event reports
(LERs) from 30 days to 60 days.
[Optional: The Administrative Section of the Technical
Specifications (TS) for [PLANT] also includes a reporting
requirement that duplicates the requirements in 10 CFR 50.72 and 10
CFR 50.73, but which does not reflect subsequent changes in those
regulations such as requiring LERs within 60 days instead of 30
days.]
3.0 Technical Evaluation
Section 2.[X] of the Facility Operating License requires the
licensee to report any violations of the requirements of Section 2[C]
of the Facility Operating License and defines the method and allowable
time periods for such reports. The reporting threshold (i.e., a
violation) for some of the conditions included in Section 2.[C] of the
Facility Operating License duplicates those defined in 10 CFR 50.72 and
10 CFR 50.73. However, the requirements in the Facility Operating
License may have different deadlines than those defined in the
regulations (following a rule change in 2001). This difference in
reporting requirements has led to variations in reporting since many
facility operating licenses do not contain the subject condition. For
those licensees with a 30-day reporting requirement in the Facility
Operating License, the condition has decreased the benefits of the
rulemaking. For those cases where the current Facility Operating
License requirement to report violations is also reportable in
accordance with the regulations defined in 10 CFR 50.72 and 10 CFR
50.73, the NRC staff finds that the regulations adequately address this
issue and the elimination of the duplicative requirement in the
Facility Operating License is acceptable.
Some of the conditions addressed in Section 2.[C] of the Facility
Operating License may address the maintenance of particular programs,
administrative requirements, or other matters where a violation of the
requirement would not result in a report to the NRC in accordance with
10 CFR 50.72 or 10 CFR 50.73. In most cases, there are requirements for
reports to the NRC related to these conditions in other regulations,
the specific license condition or technical specification, or an NRC-
approved program document. In other cases, there are reports to other
agencies or news releases that would prompt a report to the NRC (in
accordance with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(xi)). The NRC staff also assessed
violations of administrative requirements that could be reportable
under the current License Condition but that may not have a dupicative
requirement in a regulation or other regulatory requirement. The NRC
staff finds that the requirements to report such problems within 24
hours with written reports to follow using the LER process is not
needed. The NRC staff is confident that the information related to such
violations that is actually important to the NRC's regulatory functions
would come to light in a time frame comparable to the 60-day LER
requirements. The information would become available to the appropriate
NRC staff through the inspection program, updates to program documents,
resultant licensing actions, public announcements, or some other
reliable mechanism.
The NRC staff finds that the elimination of Section 2.[X] of the
Facility Operating License will not result in a loss of information to
the NRC that would adversely affect either its goal to protect public
health and safety or its ability to carry out its various other
regulatory responsibilities.
[Optional: The reporting requirement defined in TS [5.x.x] for
[PLANT] requires a report to the NRC when [REPORT REQUIREMENT]. This
requirement duplicates the requirements in 10 CFR 50.72 and 10 CFR
50.73, but does not reflect subsequent changes in those regulations
such as requiring LERs within 60 days instead of 30 days. The NRC
staff finds the elimination of the TS requirement acceptable since
the required reports are defined in an established NRC regulation
that is also applicable to this licensee.]
4.0 State Consultation
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the [ ] State
official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The
State official had no comments.
5.0 Environmental Consideration
The amendment changes recordkeeping, reporting, or administrative
procedures or requirements. Accordingly, the amendment meets the
eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR
51.22(c)(10). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact
statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection
with the issuance of the amendment.
6.0 Conclusion
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed
above, that (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and
safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the
proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance
with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the
amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to
the health and safety of the public.
Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination
Description of Amendment Request: The proposed amendment would
delete Section 2.[X] of the Facility Operating License, which requires
reporting of violations of the requirements in Section 2.[C] of the
Facility Operating License. [The proposed amendment would also delete a
reporting requirement in Technical Specifications that is duplicative
of NRC regulations.]
Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration
determination: As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), an analysis of the issue
of no significant hazards consideration is presented below:
1. Does the change involve a significant increase in the
probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed change involves the deletion of a reporting
requirement. The change does not affect plant equipment or operating
practices and therefore does not significantly increase the
probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
2. Does the change create the possibility of a new or different
kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed change is administrative in that it deletes a
reporting requirement. The change does not add new plant equipment,
change existing plant equipment, or affect the operating practices
of the facility. Therefore, the change does not create the
possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident
previously evaluated.
3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety?
Response: No.
The proposed change deletes a reporting requirement. The change
does not affect plant equipment or operating practices and therefore
does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
Based on the above, the NRC staff proposes that the change presents
no significant hazards consideration under the standards set forth in
10 CFR 50.92(c).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd of August, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
William D. Reckley,
Senior Project Manager, Section 1, Project Directorate IV, Division of
Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E5-4710 Filed 8-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P