Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual Specifications, 51004-51006 [05-17142]
Download as PDF
51004
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules
mirror. As stated in the Request for
Comments, although convex mirrors are
permitted on the passenger side of light
vehicles, the agency still receives
complaints from consumers about these
mirrors. ‘‘There have been other
problems associated with the use of
convex mirrors that include double
vision, eyestrain, and nausea.’’ (68 FR
2993, 2994 (January 22, 2003))
In response to the Request for
Comments, most commenters stated that
length should be the only relevant factor
in determining the use of a mirror of
unit magnification or a convex mirror in
a vehicle and that NHTSA should
undertake further study to determine
the maximum allowable length for a
given mirror type. However, the
Alliance and Ford stated that an outside
passenger-side mirror of unit
magnification may be needed for certain
loading dock and other off-road backing
maneuvers. Thus, if a vehicle such as
the Hummer H1 were to tow a long
object such as a trailer, the view
provided by the interior mirror of unit
magnification may be obstructed. In
such situations, an outside passengerside mirror of unit magnification would
be beneficial during lane change and
backing maneuvers.
As to the argument that certain
foreign jurisdictions permit use of
passenger-side convex mirrors on
vehicles with similar weights, we do not
find that argument compelling, because
the existence of such regulations does
not resolve our previously-discussed
concerns regarding the efficacy of such
mirrors in judging speed and distance of
approaching vehicles. As noted above,
we have concerns that the Hummer H1’s
interior mirror of unit magnification
may be obstructed during certain
applications. The agency has long held
the position that in general MPVs,
trucks, and buses with a GVWR of 4,536
kg (10,000 pounds) or more must be
equipped with exterior mirrors of unit
magnification with a reflective surface
of not less than 323 cm2. Our analysis
of the available information does not
support a change to that requirement for
the exterior mirror on the side of the
vehicle opposite of the driver. Some
vehicles of similar size to the Hummer
H1 have no rear windows, are not
equipped with an interior mirror, but
are equipped to tow a trailer. Therefore,
it would be beneficial for these vehicles
to have a flat exterior mirror on the side
of the vehicle opposite the driver for use
during lane change and backing
maneuvers.
In accordance with 49 CFR part 552,
this completes the agency’s technical
review of the petition for rulemaking.
For the reasons discussed above,
VerDate Aug<18>2005
13:16 Aug 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
NHTSA has concluded that there is no
reasonable possibility that the
amendment requested by the petitioner
would be issued at the conclusion of the
rulemaking proceeding. Therefore, the
agency has decided to terminate the
present rulemaking action.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115,
30117, and 30166; delegation of authority at
49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: August 23, 2005.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 05–17066 Filed 8–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 050819225–5225–01; I.D.
080505A]
RIN 0648–AS59
Fisheries Off West Coast States and in
the Western Pacific; Coastal Pelagic
Species Fisheries; Annual
Specifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes a regulation
to implement the annual harvest
guideline for Pacific mackerel in the
U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off
the Pacific coast. The Coastal Pelagic
Species (CPS) Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) and its implementing regulations
require NMFS to set an annual harvest
guideline for Pacific mackerel based on
the formula in the FMP. The intended
effect of this action is to propose
allowable harvest levels for Pacific
mackerel off the Pacific coast.
DATES: Comments must be received by
September 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this proposed rule identified by I.D.
080505A by any of the following
methods:
• E-mail: 0648–AS59.SWR@noaa.gov.
Include I.D. 080505A in the subject line
of the message.
• Federal e-Rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (562) 980–4047.
• Mail: Rodney R. McInnis, Regional
Administrator, Southwest Region,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
NMFS, 501 West Ocean Boulevard,
Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
The report Assessment of the Pacific
Mackerel (Scomber japonicus) Stock for
U.S. Management in the 2005–2006
Season, and an economic analysis may
be obtained at the address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tonya L. Wick, Southwest Region,
NMFS, (562) 980–4036.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FMP,
which was implemented by publication
of the final rule in the Federal Register
on December 15, 1999 (64 FR 69888),
divides management unit species into
the categories of actively managed and
monitored. Harvest guidelines of
actively managed species (Pacific
sardine and Pacific mackerel) are based
on formulas applied to current biomass
estimates. Biomass estimates are not
calculated for species that are only
monitored (jack mackerel, northern
anchovy, and market squid).
At a public meeting each year, the
biomass for each actively managed
species is reviewed by the Pacific
Fishery Management Council’s
(Council) CPS Management Team
(Team). The biomass, harvest guideline,
and status of the fisheries are then
reviewed at a public meeting of the
Council’s CPS Advisory Subpanel
(Subpanel). This information is also
reviewed by the Council’s Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC). The
Council reviews reports from the Team,
Subpanel, and SSC, then, after
providing time for public comment,
makes its recommendation to NMFS.
The annual harvest guideline and
season structure are published by NMFS
in the Federal Register as soon as
practicable before the beginning of the
appropriate fishing season. The Pacific
mackerel season begins on July 1 of each
year and ends on June 30 of the
following year.
The Team meeting took place at the
office of the NMFS, Southwest Fisheries
Science Center, in La Jolla, California,
on May 18, 2005. The Subpanel and
SSC meetings took place in conjunction
with the June 13–18, 2005, Council
meeting in Foster City, California.
The size of the Pacific mackerel
population was estimated using a newly
modified version of the integrated stock
assessment model called Age-structured
Assessment Program (ASAP). Using this
new ASAP model was recommended by
the Coastal Pelagic Species Stock
Assessment Review panel meeting held
on June 16, 2004, in La Jolla, California.
This new ASAP model replaces the old
modified virtual population analysis
stock assessment model used in
previous years. ASAP is a flexible
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules
forward-simulation that allows for the
efficient and reliable estimation of a
large number of parameters. ASAP uses
parameters such as fishery dependent
(commercial and recreational landings)
and fishery independent (e.g., aerial
spotter survey index, commercial
passenger fishing vessel logbook catch
per unit effort, and California
Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries
Investigations surveys) data to obtain
annual estimates of Pacific mackerel
abundance, year-class strength, and agespecific fishing mortality for 1983
through 2004. The biomass was
calculated through the end of 2004, then
estimated for the fishing season that
begins July 1, 2005, based on (1) the
number of Pacific mackerel estimated to
comprise each year class at the
beginning of 2005, (2) modeled
estimates of fishing mortality during
2004, (3) assumptions for natural and
fishing mortality through the first half of
2005, and (4) estimates of age-specific
growth. Based on this approach, the
biomass for July 1, 2005, would be
101,147 metric tons (mt). Applying the
formula in the FMP results in a harvest
guideline of 17,419 mt, which is 32
percent greater than last year but similar
to low harvest guidelines of recent
years.
The formula in the FMP uses the
following factors to determine the
harvest guideline:
1. The biomass of Pacific mackerel.
For 2005, this estimate is 101,147 mt.
2. The cutoff. This is the biomass
level below which no commercial
fishery is allowed. The FMP established
the cutoff level at 18,200 mt. The cutoff
is subtracted from the biomass, leaving
82,947 mt.
3. The portion of the Pacific mackerel
biomass that is in U.S. waters. This
estimate is 70 percent, based on the
historical average of larval distribution
obtained from scientific cruises and the
distribution of the resource obtained
from logbooks of fish-spotters.
Therefore, the harvestable biomass in
U.S. waters is 70 percent of 82,947 mt,
that is, 58,063 mt.
4. The harvest fraction. This is the
percentage of the biomass above 18,200
mt that may be harvested. The FMP
established the harvest fraction at 30
percent. The harvest fraction is
multiplied by the harvestable biomass
in U.S. waters (58,063 mt), which
results in 17,419 mt.
Information on the fishery and the
stock assessment are found in the report
Assessment of the Pacific Mackerel
(Scomber japonicus) Stock for U.S.
Management in the 2005–2006 Season,
which may be obtained at the address
above (see ADDRESSES).
VerDate Aug<18>2005
13:16 Aug 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
For the last three years, the fishing
industry has recommended dividing the
harvest guideline into a directed fishery
and an incidental fishery, reserving a
portion of the harvest guideline for
incidental harvest in the Pacific sardine
fishery so that the Pacific sardine
fishery is not hindered by a prohibition
on the harvest of Pacific mackerel. At its
meeting on June 15, 2005, the Subpanel
recommended for the 2005–2006 fishing
season that a directed fishery of 13,419
mt and an incidental fishery of 4,000 mt
be implemented. An incidental
allowance of 40 percent of Pacific
mackerel in landings of any CPS would
become effective if the 13,419 mt of the
directed fishery is harvested. The
Subpanel also recommended to allow
up to 1 mt of Pacific mackerel to be
landed during the incidental fishery
without the requirement to land any
other CPS. This provision provides
Pacific mackerel for small specialty
markets. The Subpanel recommended
that an inseason review of the Pacific
mackerel season be completed for the
March 2006 Council meeting, with the
possibility of reopening the directed
fishery as an automatic action if
sufficient amount of the harvest
guideline reserved for the incidental
fishery remains unharvested. At that
time the NMFS Southwest Regional
Administrator will review the fishery to
assess whether there is a sufficient
amount of the unharvested portion of
the harvest guideline (i.e., anything in
excess of the amount needed to support
incidental harvest) to warrant a
reopening of the directed fishery. As of
June 7, 2005, approximately 4,808 mt of
Pacific mackerel had been landed;
therefore, an incidental fishery was not
necessary.
Classification
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities as
follows:
The purpose of the proposed rule is to
implement the 2005–2006 harvest guideline
for Pacific mackerel in the U.S. EEZ off the
Pacific coast. The CPS FMP and its
implementing regulations require NMFS to
set an annual harvest guideline for Pacific
mackerel based on the formula in the FMP.
The harvest guideline is derived by a formula
applied to the current biomass estimate. The
formula leaves little latitude for discretion
except when errors are found in the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51005
calculations or in the data. There is no
alternative to the harvest guideline as
specified; there is no discretion to use an
adjusted formula. Further, there is only one
stock assessment method recommended for
use to establish the adult biomass used to
derive the harvest guideline. No changes are
proposed in the regulations governing the
fishery.
The harvest guideline would apply to
approximately 90 small fishing vessels
coastwide that fish for Pacific mackerel
within U.S. waters. This proposed rule has
an equal effect on all of these small entities
and therefore will impact a substantial
number of these small entities in the same
manner. These vessels fish for small pelagic
fish (Pacific sardine, Pacific mackerel) all
year and for market squid in the winter, and
may harvest tuna in the U.S. EEZ seasonally
when they are available, usually late in the
summer and early fall. These vessels are
considered small business entities by the
U.S. Small Business Administration since the
vessels do not have annual receipts in excess
of $3.5 million. Therefore, there would be no
economic impacts resulting from
disproportionality between small and large
vessels under the proposed action.
There is no limit on the amount of catch
that any single vessel can take; the harvest
guideline is available until fully utilized by
the entire CPS fleet. The small entities that
would be affected by the proposed action are
the vessels that compose the West Coast CPS
finish fleet. The profitability of these vessels
as a result of this proposed rule is based on
the average Pacific mackerel ex-vessel price
per mt. NMFS used average Pacific mackerel
average ex-vessel price per mt to conduct a
profitability analysis because it lacked cost
data for the harvesting operations of CPS
finfish vessels.
For the July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2005,
fishing year, the harvest guideline was set at
13,268 mt with an estimated ex-vessel value
of $2.1 million based. As of June 7, 2005,
only 4,808 mt had been harvested, valued at
an estimated $741 thousand, reflecting the
relatively poor market conditions for Pacific
mackerel relative to other species of interest
(e.g., Pacific sardine, market squid) and the
lack of market orders.
The 2005–2006 Pacific mackerel season
began on July 1, 2005, and ends on June 30,
2006, or when the harvest guideline is caught
and the fishery is closed. The proposed
harvest guideline for the 2005–2006 fishing
season is 17,419 mt, which is higher than the
13,268 mt harvest guideline for the prior
year. If the fleet were to take the entire 2005–
2006 harvest guideline, and assuming no
change in the coastwide average ex-vessel
price per mt of $154.35, the potential revenue
to the fleet could be approximately $2.69
million. However, if there is no change in
market conditions (i.e., a lack in demand for
Pacific mackerel product), it is not likely that
the full harvest guideline will be taken in the
2005–2006 fishing year in which case profits
may be lower than if the entire harvest
guideline were to be landed. Additionally,
the full harvest guideline may not be taken
because of the lack of availability of the
Pacific mackerel resource in the area of the
fishery. The potential lack of availability of
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
51006
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules
the resource to the fishing fleet could also
cause reduction in the amount of Pacific
mackerel that could be harvested in which
case would reduce total revenue to the fleet.
NMFS does not anticipate a drop in
profitability based on this rule as, if anything,
it allows fishermen to harvest more than last
year. Based on the disproportionality and
VerDate Aug<18>2005
13:16 Aug 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
profitability analysis above, NMFS does not
believe that there will be a significant
economic impact to a substantial number of
these small entities. As a result, an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not
required and none has been prepared.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Dated: August 24, 2005.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–17142 Filed 8–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 166 (Monday, August 29, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51004-51006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17142]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 050819225-5225-01; I.D. 080505A]
RIN 0648-AS59
Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific;
Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual Specifications
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes a regulation to implement the annual harvest
guideline for Pacific mackerel in the U.S. exclusive economic zone
(EEZ) off the Pacific coast. The Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) and its implementing regulations require NMFS to
set an annual harvest guideline for Pacific mackerel based on the
formula in the FMP. The intended effect of this action is to propose
allowable harvest levels for Pacific mackerel off the Pacific coast.
DATES: Comments must be received by September 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this proposed rule identified by
I.D. 080505A by any of the following methods:
E-mail: 0648-AS59.SWR@noaa.gov. Include I.D. 080505A in
the subject line of the message.
Federal e-Rulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (562) 980-4047.
Mail: Rodney R. McInnis, Regional Administrator, Southwest
Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Boulevard, Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA
90802.
The report Assessment of the Pacific Mackerel (Scomber japonicus)
Stock for U.S. Management in the 2005-2006 Season, and an economic
analysis may be obtained at the address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tonya L. Wick, Southwest Region, NMFS,
(562) 980-4036.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FMP, which was implemented by
publication of the final rule in the Federal Register on December 15,
1999 (64 FR 69888), divides management unit species into the categories
of actively managed and monitored. Harvest guidelines of actively
managed species (Pacific sardine and Pacific mackerel) are based on
formulas applied to current biomass estimates. Biomass estimates are
not calculated for species that are only monitored (jack mackerel,
northern anchovy, and market squid).
At a public meeting each year, the biomass for each actively
managed species is reviewed by the Pacific Fishery Management Council's
(Council) CPS Management Team (Team). The biomass, harvest guideline,
and status of the fisheries are then reviewed at a public meeting of
the Council's CPS Advisory Subpanel (Subpanel). This information is
also reviewed by the Council's Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC). The Council reviews reports from the Team, Subpanel, and SSC,
then, after providing time for public comment, makes its recommendation
to NMFS. The annual harvest guideline and season structure are
published by NMFS in the Federal Register as soon as practicable before
the beginning of the appropriate fishing season. The Pacific mackerel
season begins on July 1 of each year and ends on June 30 of the
following year.
The Team meeting took place at the office of the NMFS, Southwest
Fisheries Science Center, in La Jolla, California, on May 18, 2005. The
Subpanel and SSC meetings took place in conjunction with the June 13-
18, 2005, Council meeting in Foster City, California.
The size of the Pacific mackerel population was estimated using a
newly modified version of the integrated stock assessment model called
Age-structured Assessment Program (ASAP). Using this new ASAP model was
recommended by the Coastal Pelagic Species Stock Assessment Review
panel meeting held on June 16, 2004, in La Jolla, California. This new
ASAP model replaces the old modified virtual population analysis stock
assessment model used in previous years. ASAP is a flexible
[[Page 51005]]
forward-simulation that allows for the efficient and reliable
estimation of a large number of parameters. ASAP uses parameters such
as fishery dependent (commercial and recreational landings) and fishery
independent (e.g., aerial spotter survey index, commercial passenger
fishing vessel logbook catch per unit effort, and California
Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations surveys) data to obtain
annual estimates of Pacific mackerel abundance, year-class strength,
and age-specific fishing mortality for 1983 through 2004. The biomass
was calculated through the end of 2004, then estimated for the fishing
season that begins July 1, 2005, based on (1) the number of Pacific
mackerel estimated to comprise each year class at the beginning of
2005, (2) modeled estimates of fishing mortality during 2004, (3)
assumptions for natural and fishing mortality through the first half of
2005, and (4) estimates of age-specific growth. Based on this approach,
the biomass for July 1, 2005, would be 101,147 metric tons (mt).
Applying the formula in the FMP results in a harvest guideline of
17,419 mt, which is 32 percent greater than last year but similar to
low harvest guidelines of recent years.
The formula in the FMP uses the following factors to determine the
harvest guideline:
1. The biomass of Pacific mackerel. For 2005, this estimate is
101,147 mt.
2. The cutoff. This is the biomass level below which no commercial
fishery is allowed. The FMP established the cutoff level at 18,200 mt.
The cutoff is subtracted from the biomass, leaving 82,947 mt.
3. The portion of the Pacific mackerel biomass that is in U.S.
waters. This estimate is 70 percent, based on the historical average of
larval distribution obtained from scientific cruises and the
distribution of the resource obtained from logbooks of fish-spotters.
Therefore, the harvestable biomass in U.S. waters is 70 percent of
82,947 mt, that is, 58,063 mt.
4. The harvest fraction. This is the percentage of the biomass
above 18,200 mt that may be harvested. The FMP established the harvest
fraction at 30 percent. The harvest fraction is multiplied by the
harvestable biomass in U.S. waters (58,063 mt), which results in 17,419
mt.
Information on the fishery and the stock assessment are found in
the report Assessment of the Pacific Mackerel (Scomber japonicus) Stock
for U.S. Management in the 2005-2006 Season, which may be obtained at
the address above (see ADDRESSES).
For the last three years, the fishing industry has recommended
dividing the harvest guideline into a directed fishery and an
incidental fishery, reserving a portion of the harvest guideline for
incidental harvest in the Pacific sardine fishery so that the Pacific
sardine fishery is not hindered by a prohibition on the harvest of
Pacific mackerel. At its meeting on June 15, 2005, the Subpanel
recommended for the 2005-2006 fishing season that a directed fishery of
13,419 mt and an incidental fishery of 4,000 mt be implemented. An
incidental allowance of 40 percent of Pacific mackerel in landings of
any CPS would become effective if the 13,419 mt of the directed fishery
is harvested. The Subpanel also recommended to allow up to 1 mt of
Pacific mackerel to be landed during the incidental fishery without the
requirement to land any other CPS. This provision provides Pacific
mackerel for small specialty markets. The Subpanel recommended that an
inseason review of the Pacific mackerel season be completed for the
March 2006 Council meeting, with the possibility of reopening the
directed fishery as an automatic action if sufficient amount of the
harvest guideline reserved for the incidental fishery remains
unharvested. At that time the NMFS Southwest Regional Administrator
will review the fishery to assess whether there is a sufficient amount
of the unharvested portion of the harvest guideline (i.e., anything in
excess of the amount needed to support incidental harvest) to warrant a
reopening of the directed fishery. As of June 7, 2005, approximately
4,808 mt of Pacific mackerel had been landed; therefore, an incidental
fishery was not necessary.
Classification
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as follows:
The purpose of the proposed rule is to implement the 2005-2006
harvest guideline for Pacific mackerel in the U.S. EEZ off the
Pacific coast. The CPS FMP and its implementing regulations require
NMFS to set an annual harvest guideline for Pacific mackerel based
on the formula in the FMP. The harvest guideline is derived by a
formula applied to the current biomass estimate. The formula leaves
little latitude for discretion except when errors are found in the
calculations or in the data. There is no alternative to the harvest
guideline as specified; there is no discretion to use an adjusted
formula. Further, there is only one stock assessment method
recommended for use to establish the adult biomass used to derive
the harvest guideline. No changes are proposed in the regulations
governing the fishery.
The harvest guideline would apply to approximately 90 small
fishing vessels coastwide that fish for Pacific mackerel within U.S.
waters. This proposed rule has an equal effect on all of these small
entities and therefore will impact a substantial number of these
small entities in the same manner. These vessels fish for small
pelagic fish (Pacific sardine, Pacific mackerel) all year and for
market squid in the winter, and may harvest tuna in the U.S. EEZ
seasonally when they are available, usually late in the summer and
early fall. These vessels are considered small business entities by
the U.S. Small Business Administration since the vessels do not have
annual receipts in excess of $3.5 million. Therefore, there would be
no economic impacts resulting from disproportionality between small
and large vessels under the proposed action.
There is no limit on the amount of catch that any single vessel
can take; the harvest guideline is available until fully utilized by
the entire CPS fleet. The small entities that would be affected by
the proposed action are the vessels that compose the West Coast CPS
finish fleet. The profitability of these vessels as a result of this
proposed rule is based on the average Pacific mackerel ex-vessel
price per mt. NMFS used average Pacific mackerel average ex-vessel
price per mt to conduct a profitability analysis because it lacked
cost data for the harvesting operations of CPS finfish vessels.
For the July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2005, fishing year, the
harvest guideline was set at 13,268 mt with an estimated ex-vessel
value of $2.1 million based. As of June 7, 2005, only 4,808 mt had
been harvested, valued at an estimated $741 thousand, reflecting the
relatively poor market conditions for Pacific mackerel relative to
other species of interest (e.g., Pacific sardine, market squid) and
the lack of market orders.
The 2005-2006 Pacific mackerel season began on July 1, 2005, and
ends on June 30, 2006, or when the harvest guideline is caught and
the fishery is closed. The proposed harvest guideline for the 2005-
2006 fishing season is 17,419 mt, which is higher than the 13,268 mt
harvest guideline for the prior year. If the fleet were to take the
entire 2005-2006 harvest guideline, and assuming no change in the
coastwide average ex-vessel price per mt of $154.35, the potential
revenue to the fleet could be approximately $2.69 million. However,
if there is no change in market conditions (i.e., a lack in demand
for Pacific mackerel product), it is not likely that the full
harvest guideline will be taken in the 2005-2006 fishing year in
which case profits may be lower than if the entire harvest guideline
were to be landed. Additionally, the full harvest guideline may not
be taken because of the lack of availability of the Pacific mackerel
resource in the area of the fishery. The potential lack of
availability of
[[Page 51006]]
the resource to the fishing fleet could also cause reduction in the
amount of Pacific mackerel that could be harvested in which case
would reduce total revenue to the fleet. NMFS does not anticipate a
drop in profitability based on this rule as, if anything, it allows
fishermen to harvest more than last year. Based on the
disproportionality and profitability analysis above, NMFS does not
believe that there will be a significant economic impact to a
substantial number of these small entities. As a result, an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required and none has been
prepared.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: August 24, 2005.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05-17142 Filed 8-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S