Safety Zone Regulations, New Tacoma Narrows Bridge Construction Project, 50974-50976 [05-17091]
Download as PDF
50974
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:16 Aug 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
signal, except that from 6:31 a.m. to 8:59
a.m. Monday through Friday except
Federal holidays, the draw need open
only on the hour, and from 4:31 p.m. to
6:29 p.m. Monday through Friday
except Federal holidays, the draw need
open only on the hour and half hour.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 9, 2005.
D.B. Peterman,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–17095 Filed 8–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD13–05–033]
Environment
RIN 1625–AA00
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e) of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation.
Safety Zone Regulations, New Tacoma
Narrows Bridge Construction Project
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
I
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
Stat. 5039.
2. In § 117.353, add paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
I
§ 117.353 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
Savannah River to St. Marys River.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Skidaway, SR 204, mile 592.9 near
Savannah. The draw shall open on
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule; change in
effective period.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is extending
the effective period for a temporary
safety zone during preconstruction for
the Tacoma Narrows Bridge
construction project. The Coast Guard is
taking this action to safeguard the
public from hazards associated with the
transport and construction of the cable
wires and cable bands being used to
construct the catwalk for the new
bridge. Entry into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound or his designated
representatives.
The effective period for the
temporary final rule published at 70 FR
45537, August 8, 2005, is extended from
August 20, 2005, through September 8,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket CGD13–05–
033 and are available for inspection or
copying at Coast Guard Sector Seattle,
Waterways Management Division, 1519
Alaskan Way South, Seattle, WA 98134,
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Junior Grade Jessica Hagen,
Waterways Management Division, Coast
Guard Sector Seattle, at (206) 217–6232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Background and Purpose
On August 8, 2005, we published a
temporary final rule for Tacoma
Narrows Bridge entitled ‘‘Safety Zone
Regulations, New Tacoma Narrows
Bridge Construction Project’’ in Federal
Register (70 FR 45537) under §165.T13–
013. This temporary final rule extends
the effective period until September 8,
2005.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) has not
been published for this regulation and
good cause exists for making it effective
without publication of an NPRM in the
Federal Register. Publishing a NPRM
would be contrary to public interest
since immediate action is necessary to
ensure the safety of vessels and persons
that transit in the vicinity of the Tacoma
Narrows Bridge. If normal notice and
comment procedures were followed,
this rule would not become effective
until after the date of the event.
Discussion of Rule
As of today, the need for a safety zone
still exists. The Coast Guard is
extending the temporary safety zone
regulation on the Tacoma Narrows and
adjoining waters, for the Tacoma
Narrows Bridge Project through
September 8, 2005. The Coast Guard has
determined it is necessary to limit
access to 250 yards on either side of a
line from the approximate position of
47°16′15″ N, 122°33′15″ W, to
47°15′54″ N, 122°32′49″ W, to
47°15′49″ N, 122°32′43″ W, in order to
safeguard people and property from
hazards associated with this project.
These safety hazards include, but are
not limited to, hazards to navigation,
collisions with the cables, and collisions
with work vessels and barges. The Coast
Guard, through this action, intends to
promote the safety of personnel, vessels,
and facilities in the area. Entry into this
zone will be prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his representative. This safety zone will
be enforced by Coast Guard personnel.
The Captain of the Port may be assisted
by other Federal, State, or local
agencies.
Regulatory Evaluation
This temporary rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
and does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
significant under the regulatory policies
and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:16 Aug 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
We expect the economic impact of
this temporary rule to be so minimal
that a full Regulatory Evaluation under
paragraph 10(e) of the regulatory
policies and procedures of DHS is
unnecessary. This expectation is based
on the fact that the regulated area
established by this regulation would
encompass a small area that should not
impact commercial or recreational
traffic. For the above reasons, the Coast
Guard does not anticipate any
significant economic impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit this portion
of Tacoma Narrows during the time this
regulation is in effect. The zone will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
due to its short duration and small area.
Because the impacts of this rule are
expected to be so minimal, the Coast
Guard certifies under 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612) that this temporary rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. Small businesses may
send comments on the actions of
Federal employees who enforce, or
otherwise determine compliance with
Federal regulations to the Small
Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the
Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50975
rates each agency’s responsiveness to
small business. If you wish to comment
on actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–
734–3247).
Collection of Information
This temporary rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
We have analyzed this temporary rule
under Executive Order 13132 and have
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism under that
Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This temporary rule would not effect
a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This temporary rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian tribal governments, because
it does not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the federal
government and Indian tribes, or on the
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
50976
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the federal
government and Indian tribes.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends part
165 of title 33, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
PART 165—[AMENDED]
33 CFR Part 165
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
[CGD09–05–115]
I
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. It has not been designated by the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it
does not require a Statement of Energy
Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation.
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Section 165.T13–013 is extended
and revised to read as follows: From 5
a.m. to 9 p.m. from August 20 to
September 8, 2005, a temporary
§165.T13–013 is added to read as
follows:
I
§ 165.T13–013 Safety Zone Regulations,
New Tacoma Narrows Bridge Construction
Project.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the Tacoma
Narrows, Puget Sound, Washington
State, within 250 yards on either side of
a line with the points of 47°16′15″ N,
122°33′15″ W, to 47°15′54″ N,
122°32′49″ W, to 47°15′49″ N,
122°32′43″ W. [Datum: NAD 1983]
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in Section
165.23 of this part, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in the zone except
for those persons involved in the
construction of the new Tacoma
Narrows Bridge, supporting personnel,
or other vessels authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his designated
representatives. Vessels and persons
granted authorization to enter the safety
zone shall obey all lawful orders or
directions of the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
(c) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 5 a.m. until 9
p.m., Pacific Daylight Time, from
August 20 to September 8, 2005, except
for Sundays and September 5, 2005.
Dated: August 16, 2005.
Stephen P. Metruck,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 05–17091 Filed 8–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:16 Aug 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Coast Guard
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Irish Festival Currach
Races, Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
Lake Michigan, in Milwaukee, WI. This
zone is intended to restrict vessels from
a portion of Lake Michigan during the
Irish Festival Currach Races. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to
protect spectators and vessels from the
hazards associated with boat races.
DATES: This rule is in effect from 12 p.m.
(local) on August 20, 2005 through 6
p.m. (local) on August 21, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket [CGD09–05–115] and are
available for inspection or copying at
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan,
2420 S. Lincoln Memorial Dr,
Milwaukee, WI 53207 between 7 a.m.
(local) and 3:30 p.m. (local), Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marine Science Technician Chief
Harold Millsap, Prevention Department,
Sector Lake Michigan, 2420 S. Lincoln
Memorial Dr, Milwaukee, WI 53207,
(414) 747–7155.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The permit
application was not received in time to
publish an NPRM followed by a final
rule before the effective date. Under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be
contrary to the public interest of
ensuring the safety of spectators and
vessels during this event and immediate
action is necessary to prevent possible
loss of life or property. The Coast Guard
has not received any complaints or
negative comments previously with
regard to this event.
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 166 (Monday, August 29, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50974-50976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17091]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD13-05-033]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone Regulations, New Tacoma Narrows Bridge Construction
Project
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule; change in effective period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is extending the effective period for a
temporary safety zone during preconstruction for the Tacoma Narrows
Bridge construction project. The Coast Guard is taking this action to
safeguard the public from hazards associated with the transport and
construction of the cable wires and cable bands being used to construct
the catwalk for the new bridge. Entry into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or his
designated representatives.
DATES: The effective period for the temporary final rule published at
70 FR 45537, August 8, 2005, is extended from August 20, 2005, through
September 8, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket CGD13-05-033 and are available for
inspection or copying at Coast Guard Sector Seattle, Waterways
Management Division, 1519 Alaskan Way South, Seattle, WA 98134, between
8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Junior Grade Jessica Hagen,
Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard Sector Seattle, at (206)
217-6232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 50975]]
Background and Purpose
On August 8, 2005, we published a temporary final rule for Tacoma
Narrows Bridge entitled ``Safety Zone Regulations, New Tacoma Narrows
Bridge Construction Project'' in Federal Register (70 FR 45537) under
Sec. 165.T13-013. This temporary final rule extends the effective
period until September 8, 2005.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
has not been published for this regulation and good cause exists for
making it effective without publication of an NPRM in the Federal
Register. Publishing a NPRM would be contrary to public interest since
immediate action is necessary to ensure the safety of vessels and
persons that transit in the vicinity of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge. If
normal notice and comment procedures were followed, this rule would not
become effective until after the date of the event.
Discussion of Rule
As of today, the need for a safety zone still exists. The Coast
Guard is extending the temporary safety zone regulation on the Tacoma
Narrows and adjoining waters, for the Tacoma Narrows Bridge Project
through September 8, 2005. The Coast Guard has determined it is
necessary to limit access to 250 yards on either side of a line from
the approximate position of 47[deg]16'15'' N, 122[deg]33'15'' W, to
47[deg]15'54'' N, 122[deg]32'49'' W, to 47[deg]15'49'' N,
122[deg]32'43'' W, in order to safeguard people and property from
hazards associated with this project. These safety hazards include, but
are not limited to, hazards to navigation, collisions with the cables,
and collisions with work vessels and barges. The Coast Guard, through
this action, intends to promote the safety of personnel, vessels, and
facilities in the area. Entry into this zone will be prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or his representative. This
safety zone will be enforced by Coast Guard personnel. The Captain of
the Port may be assisted by other Federal, State, or local agencies.
Regulatory Evaluation
This temporary rule is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order. It is not significant under the regulatory policies
and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this temporary rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10(e) of the
regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. This
expectation is based on the fact that the regulated area established by
this regulation would encompass a small area that should not impact
commercial or recreational traffic. For the above reasons, the Coast
Guard does not anticipate any significant economic impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
this portion of Tacoma Narrows during the time this regulation is in
effect. The zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities due to its short duration and
small area. Because the impacts of this rule are expected to be so
minimal, the Coast Guard certifies under 605(b) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) that this temporary rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with Federal regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This temporary rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
We have analyzed this temporary rule under Executive Order 13132
and have determined that this rule does not have implications for
federalism under that Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one
year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This temporary rule would not effect a taking of private property
or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This temporary rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian tribal governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the
[[Page 50976]]
distribution of power and responsibilities between the federal
government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends part
165 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 165--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Section 165.T13-013 is extended and revised to read as follows: From
5 a.m. to 9 p.m. from August 20 to September 8, 2005, a temporary
Sec. 165.T13-013 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-013 Safety Zone Regulations, New Tacoma Narrows Bridge
Construction Project.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Tacoma Narrows, Puget Sound, Washington State, within 250 yards on
either side of a line with the points of 47[deg]16'15'' N,
122[deg]33'15'' W, to 47[deg]15'54'' N, 122[deg]32'49'' W, to
47[deg]15'49'' N, 122[deg]32'43'' W. [Datum: NAD 1983]
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Section 165.23 of this part, no person or vessel may enter or remain in
the zone except for those persons involved in the construction of the
new Tacoma Narrows Bridge, supporting personnel, or other vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representatives. Vessels and persons granted authorization to enter the
safety zone shall obey all lawful orders or directions of the Captain
of the Port or his designated representative.
(c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 5 a.m.
until 9 p.m., Pacific Daylight Time, from August 20 to September 8,
2005, except for Sundays and September 5, 2005.
Dated: August 16, 2005.
Stephen P. Metruck,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 05-17091 Filed 8-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P