Medicaid Program; Fiscal Year Disproportionate Share Hospital Allotments and Disproportionate Share Hospital Institutions for Mental Disease Limits, 50358-50372 [05-16997]
Download as PDF
50358
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
Dated: August 24, 2005.
Michelle Shortt,
Director, Regulations Development Group,
Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 05–17100 Filed 8–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–1486–N]
Medicare Program; Announcement of
New Members of the Advisory Panel
on Ambulatory Payment Classification
(APC) Groups
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The purpose of the Advisory
Panel on Ambulatory Payment
Classification (APC) Groups (the Panel)
is to review the APC groups and their
associated weights and to advise the
Secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) and the
Administrator of the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
concerning the clinical integrity of the
APC groups and their associated
weights. The advice provided by the
Panel will be considered as CMS
prepares its annual updates of the
hospital Outpatient Prospective
Payment System (OPPS) through
rulemaking. This notice announces the
new members selected to serve on the
Panel.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
inquiries about the Panel, please contact
the Designated Federal Officer (DFO):
Shirl Ackerman-Ross, DFO, CMS, CMM,
HAPG, DOC, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Mail Stop C4–05–17, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850. Phone (410) 786–4474.
E-mail Address for comments is:
APCPanel@cms.hhs.gov. News media
representatives must contact our Public
Affairs Office at (202) 690–6145.
Advisory Committees’ Information
Lines: The CMS Advisory Committees’
Information Line is 1–877–449–5659
(toll free) and (410) 786–9379 (local).
Web Sites: For additional information
on APC meeting agendas and updates to
the Panel’s activities, search our Web
site at: https://www.cms.hhs.gov/faca/
apc/default.asp. To obtain Charter
copies, search our Web site at https://
www.cms.hhs.gov/faca or e-mail the
Panel DFO.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
I. Background
The Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS) (the
Secretary) is required by section
1833(t)(9)(A) of the Social Security Act,
as amended and redesignated by
sections 201(h) and 202(a)(2) of the
Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP
Balanced Budget Refinement Act of
1999 (Pub. L. 106–113), respectively, to
establish and consult with an expert,
outside advisory panel on APC groups.
The APC Panel meets up to three times
annually to review the APC groups and
to provide technical advice to the
Secretary and the Administrator of the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) (the Administrator)
concerning the clinical integrity of the
groups and their associated weights. All
members must have technical expertise
that will enable them to participate fully
in the work of the Panel. The expertise
encompasses hospital payment systems,
hospital medical-care delivery systems,
outpatient payment requirements, APCs,
Physicians’ Current Procedural
Terminology Codes (CPTs), the use and
payment of drugs and medical devices
in the outpatient setting, and other
forms of relevant expertise. It is not
necessary that any one member be an
expert in all areas.
We will consider the technical advice
provided by the Panel as we prepare the
final rule that updates the OPPS
payment rates for the next calendar
year. The Secretary re-chartered the
Panel on November 1, 2004.
II. Announcement of New Members
The Panel may consist of a Chair and
up to 15 representatives who are fulltime employees (not consultants) of
Medicare providers, which are subject
to the OPPS. Panel members serve
without compensation, according to an
advance written agreement; however,
travel, meals, lodging, and related
expenses are reimbursed in accordance
with standard Government travel
regulations. CMS has a special interest
for ensuring that women, minorities,
and the physically challenged are
adequately represented on the Panel.
The Secretary, or his designee,
appoints new members to the Panel
from among those candidates
determined to have the required
expertise. New appointments are made
in a manner that ensures a balanced
membership.
The Panel presently consists of the
following members and a Chair:
• Edith Hambrick, M.D., J.D., Chair.
• Marilyn Bedell, M.S., R.N., O.C.N.
• Albert Brooks Einstein, Jr., M.D.
• Sandra J. Metzler, M.B.A., R.H.I.A.,
C.P.H.Q.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Frank G. Opelka, M.D., F.A.C.S.
• Louis Potters, M.D., F.A.C.R.
• Lou Ann Schraffenberger, M.B.A.,
R.H.I.A., C.C.S.-P.
• Judie S. Snipes, R.N., M.B.A.,
F.A.C.H.E.
• Lynn R. Tomascik, R.N., M.S.N.,
C.N.A.A.
• Timothy Gene Tyler, Pharm.D.
On February 25, 2005, we published
a notice in the Federal Register (70 FR
9336) requesting nominations to the
Panel to replace the six Panel members
whose terms expired on March 31, 2005.
In order to obtain additional nominees
whose expertise matched the needs of
the Panel, we published a second notice
in the Federal Register on April 8, 2005
(70 FR 18028) extending the deadline.
As a result of these two notices, the six
new 4-year appointments to the APC
Panel effective August 17, 2005, and
ending August 16, 2009, are as follows:
• Gloryanne Bryant, B.S., R.H.I.A.,
R.H.I.T., C.C.S.
• Hazel Kimmel, R.N., C.C.S., C.P.C.
• Thomas M. Munger, M.D., F.A.C.C.
• James V. Rawson, M.D.
• Kim Allan Williams, M.D., F.A.C.C.,
F.A.B.C.
• Robert Matthew Zwolak, M.D.,
Ph.D., F.A.C.S.
Authority: Section 1833(t) of the Act (42
U.S.C. 1395l(t)). The Panel is governed by the
provisions of Pub. L. 92–463, as amended (5
U.S.C. Appendix 2).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; and Program No. 93.774,
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program).
Dated: August 9, 2005.
Mark B. McClellan,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 05–16798 Filed 8–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–03–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–2209–N]
RIN 0938–AJ74
Medicaid Program; Fiscal Year
Disproportionate Share Hospital
Allotments and Disproportionate Share
Hospital Institutions for Mental
Disease Limits
AGENCY: Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice
announces the
final Federal share disproportionate
share hospital (DSH) allotments for
Federal fiscal years (FFYs) 2003 and
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
2004, and the preliminary Federal share
DSH allotments for FFY 2005. It also
announces the final FFYs 2003 and
2004, and the preliminary FFY 2005,
limitations on aggregate DSH payments
that States may make to institutions for
mental disease (IMDs) and other mental
health facilities. This notice also
includes a background describing the
methodology for determining the
amounts of States’ FFY DSH allotments
for FFY 1998 and thereafter.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Strauss, (410) 786–2019.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Disproportionate Share Hospital
(DSH) Allotments and Institutions for
Mental Disease (IMD) DSH Limits
Published in the Federal Register on
October 8, 1998
We published a notice in the October
8, 1998 Federal Register (63 FR 54142)
that announced the Federal share DSH
allotments for FFYs 1998 through 2002
and the IMD DSH limits for FFYs 1998
and 1999. The DSH allotments and IMD
DSH limits published in that notice
specified and were determined in
accordance with sections 1923(f) and
1923(h) of the Social Security Act (the
Act), as amended by the Balanced
Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), Pub. L. 105–
33 (enacted on August 5, 1997). The
notice also reflected the FFY 1998 DSH
allotment for one State, specified in
accordance with section 601 of Pub. L.
105–78 (enacted on November 13,
1997).
Additional legislative changes relating
to the amounts or methodologies for
calculating the States’ DSH allotments
or IMD DSH limits were made to the Act
since the publication of the October 8,
1998 notice. In this section and in
section II of this notice, we describe
subsequent legislative changes related to
the DSH calculation of the DSH
allotments and IMD DSH limits for
fiscal years.
B. Disproportionate Share Hospital
Allotments for Federal Fiscal Years
(FFYs) 1998 Through 2000
Section 4721(a) of the BBA amended
section 1923(f) of the Act to require that
Federal Medicaid DSH expenditures be
limited by the statutorily defined
Federal share DSH allotments for FFYs
1998 through 2002 specified in a chart
in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act. Section
601 of Pub. L. 105–78 amended the DSH
allotment contained in this chart for the
State of Minnesota for FFY 1998. On
October 8, 1998, we published a notice
of the statutorily prescribed DSH
allotments for all States for FFYs 1998
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
through 2002, in accordance with the
amounts specified in the chart at section
1923(f)(2) of the Act, as established by
the BBA and as amended by Pub. L.
105–78. Subsequent to the publication
of the DSH allotments for these years, a
number of legislative actions revised the
DSH allotments specified in the chart at
section 1923(f)(2) of the Act, for certain
States. Specifically, sections 702, 703,
and 704 of Pub. L. 105–277 (enacted on
October 21, 1998) amended the FFY
1999 DSH allotments for Minnesota,
New Mexico, and Wyoming,
respectively, and section 601(a) of the
Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP Balanced
Budget Refinement Act of 1999 (BBRA)
(Pub. L. 106–113, enacted on November
29, 1999) amended the FFYs 2000, 2001,
and 2002 DSH allotments for the District
of Columbia, Minnesota, New Mexico,
and Wyoming.
C. DSH Allotments for FFYs 2001 and
2002
Section 701(a) of the Medicare,
Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits
Improvement and Protection Act of
2000 (BIPA) (Pub. L. 106–554, enacted
on December 21, 2000) added a new
section 1923(f)(4) of the Act that
provided for a ‘‘Special Rule for Fiscal
Years 2001 and 2002,’’ under which
States’ DSH allotments for FFY 2001
and 2002 would be determined through
the application of a methodology. The
DSH allotments for FFYs 2001 and 2002
as calculated under this methodology
superseded the DSH allotments for
those years specified in the chart at
section 1923(f)(2) of the Act.
Under section 1923(f)(4) of the Act,
the DSH allotments for FFY 2001 and
FFY 2002 were determined by
increasing the States’ prior FFY DSH
allotments by the Consumer Price Index
for all Urban Consumers (CPI–U) for the
prior fiscal year, subject to the
limitation that an increase to a State’s
DSH allotment for a fiscal year could
not result in the DSH allotment
exceeding the greater of the State’s DSH
allotment for the previous fiscal year or
12 percent of the State’s total medical
assistance expenditures for the
allotment year (referred to as the 12
percent limit). For example, if
increasing a State’s FY 2001 DSH
allotment by the CPI–U for FY 2001
resulted in an amount that was higher
than 12 percent of the State’s total
medical assistance expenditures for FY
2002, and the 12 percent limit was
higher than the States’ FY 2001 DSH
allotment, the State’s FY 2002 DSH
allotment would be limited to the 12
percent limit. The application of this
special rule for FFY 2001 and FFY 2002
had the effect of increasing States’ DSH
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50359
allotments for those years, as compared
to the allotments they would have
received under the chart at section
1923(f)(2) of the Act. In fact, the chart
contained at section 1923(f)(2) of the
Act generally would have provided for
a decrease or no change in States’ DSH
allotments over the fiscal years 1998
through 2002.
BIPA also added a new section
1923(f)(5) of the Act (Pub. L. 106–554
section 701(a)(2)), which established a
‘‘Special Rule for Extremely Low DSH
States.’’ Under this rule, States with
FFY 1999 DSH expenditures that were
greater than zero percent and less than
1 percent of the States’ FFY 1999 total
medical assistance expenditures were
considered to be ‘‘low-DSH States.’’
Under section 1923(f)(5) of the Act, the
Low-DSH States’ FFY 2001 DSH
allotments were increased to 1 percent
of the States’ total FFY 2001 medical
assistance expenditures. The Low-DSH
States’ increased FFY 2001 DSH
allotments were the basis for calculating
the States’ FFY 2002 DSH allotments.
That is, similar to the methodology
applied for determining the other (nonLow-DSH) States’ allotments, the LowDSH States’ FFY 2002 allotments were
determined by increasing their FFY
2001 allotment (as determined under
the Low-DSH provision at section
1923(f)(5) of the Act) by the CPI–U for
the prior fiscal year, subject to the 12
percent limit.
D. DSH Allotments for FFY 2003
Section 1923(f)(3) of the Act, as
established by the BBA and amended by
the BIPA, provided for States’ FFY 2003
DSH allotments to be calculated by
increasing their FFY 2002 allotments (as
specified in the chart in section
1923(f)(2) of the Act) by the CPI–U for
the prior fiscal year, subject to the 12
percent limit. That is, the FFY 2003
allotments were not based on the FFY
2002 DSH allotments as were
determined under section 1923(f)(4) of
the Act. Since the FFY 2002 DSH
allotments specified in the chart in
section 1923(f)(2) of the Act were lower
than the actual FFY 2002 DSH
allotments (determined under section
1923(f)(4) of the Act), in general, States’
FFY 2003 DSH allotments were lower
than their FFY 2002 allotments. The
exception to this were the FFY 2003
DSH allotments for the Low-DSH States.
Under the Low-DSH State provision, the
Low-DSH States’ FFY 2003 allotments
were determined by increasing their
actual FFY 2002 DSH allotments (not
their FFY 2002 allotments specified in
the chart in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act)
by the CPI–U for the previous fiscal
year. Therefore, Low-DSH States’ DSH
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
50360
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
allotments increased (in general by the
CPI–U) from FFY 2002 to FFY 2003.
E. DSH Allotments for FFY 2004
Section 1001(a) of the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) (Pub.
L. 108–173, enacted on December 8,
2003) amended section 1923(f)(3) of the
Act to provide for a ‘‘Special,
Temporary Increase In Allotments On A
One-Time, Non-Cumulative Basis.’’
Under this provision, States’ FFY 2004
DSH allotments were determined by
increasing their FFY 2003 allotments by
16 percent, and the fiscal year DSH
allotment amounts so determined were
not subject to the 12 percent limit.
F. DSH Allotments for Non-Low DSH
States for FFY 2005, and Fiscal Years
Thereafter
Under the methodology contained in
section 1923(f)(3)(C) of the Act, as
amended by the MMA, the non-LowDSH States’ DSH allotments for FFY
2005 and subsequent fiscal years
continues at the same level as the States’
DSH allotments for FFY 2004 until a
‘‘fiscal year specified’’ occurs. The
‘‘fiscal year specified’’ is the first fiscal
year for which the Secretary estimates
that a State’s DSH allotment equals (or
no longer exceeds) the DSH allotment as
would have been determined under the
statute in effect before the enactment of
the MMA. We determine whether the
fiscal year specified has occurred under
a special parallel process. Specifically,
under this process, a DSH allotment is
determined for FFYs after 2003 by
increasing the State’s DSH allotment for
the previous fiscal year by the CPI–U for
the prior fiscal year, subject to the 12
percent limit. The fiscal year specified
will be the fiscal year when the DSH
allotment calculated under this special
parallel process finally equals or
exceeds the FY 2004 DSH allotment, as
determined under the MMA provisions.
Once the fiscal year specified occurs for
a State, that State’s fiscal year DSH
allotment will be calculated by
increasing the State’s previous actual
fiscal year DSH allotment (which would
be equal to the FY 2004 DSH allotment)
by the CPI–U, subject to the 12 percent
limit. The following example illustrates
how the fiscal year DSH allotment
would be calculated for fiscal years after
FFY 2004.
Example —A State’s FFY 2003 DSH
allotment is $100 million. Under the MMA,
the State’s FFY 2004 DSH allotment would
be $116 million ($100 million increased by
16 percent). The State’s DSH allotment for
subsequent fiscal years would continue at
$116 million for fiscal years following FFY
2004 until the ‘‘fiscal year specified’’ occurs.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
In a separate parallel process, we determine
whether the fiscal year specified has
occurred by calculating the State’s DSH
allotments in accordance with the statute in
effect before the enactment of the MMA.
Under this special process, we determine the
State’s DSH allotment each fiscal year by
increasing the State’s DSH allotment for the
previous fiscal year (as also determined
under the special parallel process) by the
CPI–U for the previous fiscal year, and
subject to the 12 percent limit. Assume for
purposes of this example that, in accordance
with this special process, the State’s FFY
2007 DSH allotment was determined to be
$115 million and the CPI–U for FFY 2007
was 2 percent. Therefore, under the special
parallel process, the State’s FFY 2008 DSH
allotment would be $117.3 million (that is,
$115 million increased by the 2 percent CPI–
U for FFY 2007). Since $117.3 is greater than
$116 million (the FFY 2004 DSH allotment
calculated under the MMA), we would
determine that FFY 2008 is the ‘‘fiscal year
specified.’’ We would then determine the
State’s FFY 2008 allotment as the FFY 2007
actual allotment ($116 million) increased by
the CPI–U for FFY 2007 (2 percent).
Therefore, the State’s FFY 2008 DSH
allotment would be $118.32 million ($116
million increased by 2 percent); for purposes
of this example, the application of the 12
percent limit has no effect. For FFY 2009 and
thereafter, the State’s DSH allotment would
be calculated by increasing the previous
fiscal year’s DSH allotment by the CPI–U,
subject to the 12 percent limit.
However, as amended by the MMA,
section 1923(f)(5)(B) of the Act contains
new criteria for determining whether a
State is a Low-DSH State, beginning
with FFY 2004. This provision is
described in section I.G below.
G. DSH Allotments For Low-DSH States
for FFYs 2004, and Fiscal Years
Thereafter
The MMA amended section 1923(f)(5)
of the Act regarding the calculation of
the fiscal year DSH allotments for ‘‘LowDSH’’ States for FFY 2004 and
subsequent fiscal years. Specifically,
under section 1923(f)(5)(B) of the Act, as
amended by the MMA, a State is
considered a Low-DSH State for FFY
2004 if its total DSH payments under its
State plan for FFY 2000 (including
Federal and State shares) as reported to
us as of August 31, 2003, are greater
than 0 percent and less than 3 percent
of the State’s total FFY 2000
expenditures under its State plan for
medical assistance. For States that meet
the new Low-DSH criteria, their FFY
2004 DSH allotments are calculated by
increasing their FFY 2003 DSH
allotments by 16 percent. Therefore, for
FFY 2004, Low-DSH States’ fiscal year
DSH allotments are calculated in the
same way as the DSH allotments for
regular States, which under the Act
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
section 1923(f)(3) get the special
temporary increase for FFY 2004.
Furthermore, for States meeting the
new MMA Low-DSH definition, the
DSH allotments for FFYs 2005 through
2008 will continue to be determined by
increasing the previous fiscal year’s
DSH allotment by 16 percent. The LowDSH States’ DSH allotments for FFYs
2004 through 2008 are not subject to the
12 percent limit. The Low-DSH States’
DSH allotments for FFYs 2009 and
subsequent fiscal years are calculated by
increasing those States’ DSH allotments
for the prior fiscal year by the CPI-U for
that prior fiscal year. For FFYs 2009 and
thereafter, the DSH allotments so
determined would be subject to the 12
percent limit.
H. IMD DSH Limits for FFYs 1998 and
Thereafter
Section 4721(b) of the BBA added
section 1923(h) to the Act which
provides that Federal financial
participation (FFP) is not available for
DSH payments to IMDs and other
mental health facilities that are in
excess of State-specific aggregate limits.
In implementing the IMD DSH limit
under the BBA in the October 8, 1998
Federal Register notice as codified in
section 1923(h)(1) of the Act, we
indicated that the aggregate limit of IMD
and other mental health facilities to be
the lesser of a State’s FFY 1995 total
computable (State and Federal share)
IMD and other mental health facility
DSH expenditures applicable to the
State’s FFY 1995 DSH allotment (as
reported on the Form CMS–64 as of
January 1, 1997), or the amount equal to
the product of the State’s current year
total computable DSH allotment and the
applicable percentage.
Each State’s IMD limit on DSH
payments to IMDs and other mental
health facilities is calculated by first
determining the State’s total computable
DSH expenditures attributable to the
FFY 1995 DSH allotment for mental
health facilities and inpatient hospitals.
This was based on the total computable
DSH expenditures reported by the State
on the Form CMS–64 as mental health
DSH and inpatient hospital as of
January 1, 1997.
Once we determine the total
computable amount of DSH
expenditures applicable to the FFY 1995
DSH allotment, we then calculate an
‘‘applicable percentage.’’ The applicable
percentage for FFY 1998 through FFY
2000 (1995 IMD DSH percentage) is
calculated by dividing the total
computable amount of IMD and mental
health DSH expenditures applicable to
the State’s FFY 1995 DSH allotment by
the total computable amount of all DSH
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
expenditures (mental health facility
plus inpatient hospital) applicable to
the FFY 1995 DSH allotment. For FFY
2001 and thereafter, the applicable
percentage is defined as the lesser of the
applicable percentage as calculated
above (for FFYs 1998 through 2001) or
50 percent for FFY 2001; 40 percent for
FFY 2002; and 33 percent for each
subsequent FFY.
The applicable percentage is then
applied to each State’s total computable
FFY DSH allotment for the current FFY.
The State’s total computable FFY DSH
allotment is calculated by dividing the
State’s Federal share DSH allotment for
the FFY by the State’s Federal medical
assistance percentage (FMAP) for that
FFY.
In the final step of the calculation, the
State’s total computable IMD DSH limit
for the FFY is set at the lesser of the
product of a State’s current fiscal year
total computable DSH allotment and the
applicable percentage for that fiscal
year, or the State’s FFY 1995 total
computable IMD and other mental
health facility DSH expenditures
applicable to the State’s FFY 1995 DSH
allotment as reported on the Form
CMS–64.
The MMA legislation did not amend
the Medicaid statute with respect to the
calculation of the IMD DSH limit.
I. DSH Allotments and IMD DSH Limits
Published in the Federal Register on
March 26, 2004
On March 26, 2004, we published in
the Federal Register (69 FR 15850) the
final Federal share DSH allotments for
FFYs 2001 and 2002, and the
preliminary Federal share DSH
allotments for FFY 2003 (as determined
under the Medicaid statute in effect
before the enactment of the MMA). The
March 26, 2004 notice also announced
the preliminary FFY 2004 Federal share
DSH allotments (as determined under
the MMA provisions).
The March 26, 2004 Federal Register
notice also announced the final FFYs
2000, 2001, and 2002, and the
preliminary FFYs 2003 and 2004,
limitations on aggregate DSH payments
that States may make to IMDs and other
mental health facilities.
The March 26, 2004 Federal Register
notice also described the methodologies
for determining the amounts of States’
FFY DSH allotments for FFY 2001 and
thereafter, and it republished the
Federal share DSH allotments for FFYs
1998 through 2000, and the final FFYs
1998 and 1999 limitations on aggregate
DSH payments that States may make to
IMDs and other mental health facilities.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
J. Publication in the Federal Register
of Preliminary and Final Notice for DSH
Allotments and IMD DSH Limits
In general, we initially determine
States’ DSH allotments and IMD DSH
limits for a fiscal year using estimates of
medical assistance expenditures,
including DSH expenditures in their
Medicaid programs. These estimates are
provided by States each year on the
August quarterly Medicaid budget
reports (Form CMS–37) before the
Federal fiscal year for which the DSH
allotments and IMD DSH limits are
being determined. The DSH allotments
and IMD DSH limits determined using
these estimates are referred to as
‘‘preliminary.’’ Only after we receive
States’ reports of the actual related
medical assistance expenditures
through the quarterly expenditure report
(Form CMS–64), are the ‘‘final’’ DSH
Allotments and IMD DSH limits
determined. In this regard, the DSH
allotments for FFY 1998 through FFY
2000, as published in the October 8,
1998 Federal Register notice were
considered as final since these
allotments were prescribed in the chart
in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act.
Similarly, the FFY 1998 and FFY 1999
IMD DSH limits published in the
October 8, 1998 Federal Register were
also considered as final, since these
limits were based on the actual
expenditures from FFY 1995 and the
final FFY 1998 and FFY 1999 DSH
allotments.
As indicated in the previous
paragraph I, the notice published in the
Federal Register on March 26, 2004
announced the final FFY 2001 and 2002
DSH allotments (since they were based
on the actual related expenditures), the
preliminary FFY 2003 and 2004 DSH
allotments (since they were based on
estimated expenditures), the final FFY
2000 through 2002 IMD DSH limits
(based on the final DSH allotments for
those fiscal years), and the preliminary
FFY 2003 and 2004 IMD DSH limits
(since they were based on the
preliminary DSH allotments for those
years).
This notice announces the final FFYs
2003 and 2004 DSH allotments and the
final FFYs 2003 and 2004 IMD DSH
limits (since they are based on the
actual related expenditures), the
preliminary FFY 2005 DSH allotments
(based on estimates), and the
preliminary IMD DSH limits (since they
are based on the preliminary DSH
allotments for FFY 2005).
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50361
II. Calculation of the Final FFY 2003
Federal Share State DSH Allotments,
the Final FFY 2004 Federal Share State
DSH Allotments, and the Preliminary
FFY 2005 Federal Share State DSH
Allotments
Charts 1 and 2 of the Addendum to
this notice provide the States’ ‘‘final’’
FFY 2003 and FFY 2004 DSH
allotments. The final FFY 2003 DSH
allotments for each State were
computed using the States’ expenditure
reports (Form CMS–64) for FFY 2003.
As required by the provisions of the
MMA, the final FFY 2004 DSH
allotments for the ‘‘Low-DSH’’ States
and all the other States were calculated
by increasing the FFY 2003 DSH
allotments by 16 percent. The definition
and determination of the ‘‘Low-DSH’’
States under the MMA provisions were
explained and published in the March
26, 2004 Federal Register notice.
Chart 3 of the Addendum to this
notice provides the States’
‘‘preliminary’’ FFY 2005 DSH
allotments. These preliminary
allotments were determined using the
States’ August 2004 expenditure
estimates submitted by the States on the
Form CMS–37. We will publish the final
FFY 2005 DSH allotments for each State
following receipt of the States’ four
quarterly Medicaid expenditure reports
(Form CMS–64) for FFY 2005. As
discussed earlier in this notice, the
criteria and determination of the ‘‘LowDSH’’ States were also explained and
published in the March 26, 2004
Federal Register notice.
III. Calculation of the FFYs 2000
Through 2005 IMD DSH Limits
Section 1923(h) of the Act specifies
the methodology to be used to establish
the limits on the amount of DSH
payments that a State can make to IMDs
and other mental health facilities. FFP
is not available for IMD/DSH payments
that exceed the lesser of the State’s FFY
1995 total computable mental health
DSH expenditures applicable to the
State’s FFY 1995 DSH allotment as
reported to us on the Form CMS–64 as
of January 1, 1997; or the amount equal
to the product of the State’s current FFY
total computable DSH allotment and the
applicable percentage. The amounts of
the limits on IMD DSH expenditures
were made available to the States as part
of their CMS–64 report. We are
publishing the final FFY 2003 and FFY
2004 IMD DSH limit limits, and the
preliminary FFY 2005 IMD DSH limit
along with an explanation of the
calculation of these limits.
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
50362
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
For FFY 2000, the applicable
percentage was computed as the ratio
of—
(1) The State’s FFY 1995 total
computable (Federal and State share)
mental health DSH payments applicable
to the State’s FFY 1995 DSH allotment
and as reported on the Form CMS–64 as
of January 1, 1997; compared to
(2) The State’s FFY 1995 total
computable amount of all DSH
expenditures (mental health facility and
inpatient hospital) applicable to the
State’s FFY 1995 DSH allotment as
reported on the Form CMS–64 as of
January 1, 1997.
For FFY 2000, the applicable
percentage was calculated and applied
to the State’s FFY 2000 total computable
DSH allotment. States’ total computable
FFY 2000 DSH allotment was calculated
by dividing each State’s Federal share
DSH allotment for FFY 2000 by the
State’s Federal medical assistance
percentage (FMAP) for FFY 2000. This
result was then compared to the State’s
FFY 1995 total computable mental
health DSH expenditures applicable to
the State’s FFY 1995 DSH allotment as
reported on the Form CMS–64 as of
January 1, 1997. The lesser of these two
amounts was the State’s limitation on
total computable IMD/DSH
expenditures for FFY 2000.
For FFY 2001, the applicable
percentage was the lesser of 50 percent
or the 1995 DSH IMD percentage of the
amount computed for FFY 2000.
This percentage was applied to the
State’s FFY 2001 total computable DSH
allotment. This result was then
compared to the State’s FFY 1995 total
computable mental health DSH
expenditures applicable to the State’s
FFY 1995 DSH allotment as reported on
the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997.
The lesser of these two amounts was the
State’s limitation on total computable
IMD/DSH expenditures for FFY 2001.
For FFY 2002, the applicable
percentage was the lesser of 40 percent
or the 1995 DSH IMD percentage of the
amount computed for FFY 2000. This
percentage was applied to the State’s
FFY 2002 total computable DSH
allotment. This result was then
compared to the State’s FFY 1995 total
computable mental health DSH
expenditures applicable to the State’s
FFY 1995 DSH allotment as reported on
the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997.
The lesser of these two amounts was the
State’s limitation on total computable
IMD/DSH expenditures for FFY 2002.
For FFY 2003 and following fiscal
years, the applicable percentage was the
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
lesser of 33 percent or the 1995 DSH
IMD percentage of the amount
computed for FFY 2000. This
percentage was applied to the State’s
fiscal year total computable DSH
allotment. This result was then
compared to the State’s FFY 1995 total
computable mental health DSH
expenditures applicable to the State’s
FFY 1995 DSH allotment as reported on
the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997.
The lesser of these two amounts was the
State’s limitation on total computable
IMD/DSH expenditures for FFY 2003
and following fiscal years.
Charts 4 through 6 of the Addendum
to this notice detail each State’s final
IMD/DSH limitation for FFYs 2003 and
2004, and the preliminary IMD/DSH
limitation for FFY 2005, respectively, in
accordance with section 1923(h) of the
Act.
IV. Collection of Information
Requirements
This document does not impose
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
Consequently, it need not be reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501).
V. Regulatory Impact Statement
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601 through 612, requires a
regulatory flexibility analysis for every
rule subject to proposed rulemaking
procedures under the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553, unless we
certify that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. For
purposes of the RFA, States and
individuals are not considered small
entities. However, providers with
receipts ranging from less than $6
million to less than $29 million
depending on their provider type are
considered small entities (65 FR 69432,
November 17, 2000). Due to the various
controlling statutes, the effects on
providers are not a result of any
independent regulatory impact and not
this notice. The purpose of the notice is
to simply announce the latest
distributions as required by the statute.
Additionally, section 1102(b) of the
Act requires us to prepare a regulatory
impact analysis if a notice may have a
significant impact on the operations of
a substantial number of small rural
hospitals. Such an analysis must
conform to the provisions of section 604
of the RFA. For purposes of section
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1102(b) of the Act, we define a small
rural hospital as a hospital that is
located outside of a Metropolitan
Statistical Area and has fewer than 100
beds.
The BBA and the BBRA set statutorily
defined limits on the amount of Federal
share DSH expenditures available for
FFYs 1998 through 2002.
The BIPA amended sections of the
Act that set forth these statutorily
defined Federal DSH allotments.
Based on these amendments to the
DSH allotment provisions of the
Medicaid statute, the limits initially
imposed by the BBA and the BBRA had
a negative impact on the availability of
FFP to States by reducing the DSH
allotments available to States, thus
potentially negatively impacting the
availability of Medicaid expenditures to
hospitals, especially IMDs. However,
the BIPA reduced the Federal savings,
thus increasing the amount of Federal
funding available to States under the
DSH program. Finally, section 1001 of
the MMA increased the DSH allotment
for States beginning with fiscal year
2004. While overall the statute
mandated some reduction in DSH
payments, we do not believe that this
notice will have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because it reflects no new
policies or procedures.
In section 202, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act requires that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits for any
rule that may result in an annual
expenditure by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $110 million or more.
This notice has no consequential effect
on State, local, or tribal governments, or
the private sector, and will not create an
unfunded mandate.
We have reviewed this notice under
the threshold criteria of Executive Order
13132, Federalism. We have determined
that it does not significantly affect the
rights, roles, and responsibilities of
States.
In accordance with the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, this notice was
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Addendum
This addendum contains the charts 1
through 6 (including associated keys)
that are referred to in the preamble of
this notice.
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
50363
CHART 1.—FINAL 2003 DSH ALLOTMENTS
[Key to the chart of the final FFY 2003 DSH Allotments]
Column
Description
Column A ........................................
Column B ........................................
Column C ........................................
State
FY 2003 FMAPS—FFY 2003 Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP).
FY 2002 Federal Share DSH Allotment—This column contains the final FFY 2002 DSH allotments from
section 1923(f)(2) of the Act.
FY 2002 DSH Allotment INCR. By CPIU. This column contains the FFY 2002 DSH allotments in Column C
increased by the CPIU for that fiscal year.
FY 2003 TC MAP EXP including DSH. This column contains the total computable medical assistance expenditures including DSH for FFY 2003.
FY 2003 TC DSH Expenditures. This column contains the actual total computable DSH expenditures for
FFY 2003.
FY 2003 TC MAP EXP. Net of DSH. This column contains the total computable medical assistance expenditures, net of DSH expenditures, for FFY 2003.
12 Percent Limit (IN FS). This column contains the 12 Percent Limit; this is a Federal share amount.
Greater of COL H OR COL C. This column contains an amount which is the greater of Column H (the 12
percent limit) or Column C (the Federal share FFY 2002 DSH allotment).
FY 2003 DSH Allotments Federal Share. This column contains the lesser of Column I or Column D This is
the final Federal share DSH Allotment for FY 2003.
Column D ........................................
Column E ........................................
Column F ........................................
Column G ........................................
Column H ........................................
Column I ..........................................
Column J .........................................
CHART 2.—FINAL DSH ALLOTMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004
[Key to the chart of the final FFY 2004 DSH Allotments. The final FFY 2004 DSH allotments for the regular States are presented in the top
section of this chart and the final FFY 2004 DSH allotments for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of the chart.]
Column
Description
Column A ........................................
Column B ........................................
Column C ........................................
State.
FY 2003 Final Federal Share DSH Allotment. This column contains the final FFY 2003 DSH allotments.
FY 2004 FS DSH Allotment = COL B × 116. This column contains the FFY 2003 DSH allotments in Column C increased by 16 percent.
MMA Low DSH Status. This column indicates the LOW DSH Status of each State.
Column D ........................................
CHART 3.—PRELIMINARY DSH ALLOTMENTS FOR FY 2005
[Key to the Chart of the Preliminary FFY 2005 DSH Allotments. The preliminary FFY 2005 DSH Allotments for the regular States are presented
in the top section of this chart and the preliminary FFY 2005 DSH Allotments for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of
the chart.]
Column
Description
For Non-Low-DSH States:
Column A .................................
Column B .................................
Column C .................................
Column D .................................
For Low-DSH States:
Column A .................................
Column B .................................
Column C .................................
Column D .................................
State.
Final FY 2004 DSH Allotment Federal Share—This column contains the final FFY 2004 DSH Allotments.
FY 2005 DSH Allotment Federal Share—This column contains the preliminary FFY 2005 DSH Allotments.
MMA Low-DSH Status—This column indicates the MMA Low-DSH Status of each State.
State.
Prior FY DSH Allotment—This column contains the final FFY 2004 DSH Allotments.
FY 2005 DSH Allotments Federal Share—This column contains the preliminary FFY 2005 DSH Allotments
= Column B multiplied by 1.16.
MMA Low-DSH Status—This column indicates the MMA Low-DSH Status of each State.
CHART 4.—FINAL FFY 2003 IMD DSH LIMITS
[Key to the Chart of the FFY 2003 IMD Limitations]
Column
Description
Column A ........................................
Column B ........................................
State.
Inpatient Hospital Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the States’ total computable FFY 1995 inpatient hospital DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64.
IMD and Mental Health Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the total computable
FFY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1,
1997.
Total Inpatient & IMD & Mental Health FY 95 DSH Total Computable, Col. B + C. This column contains the
total computation of all inpatient hospital DSH expenditures and mental health facility DSH expenditures
for FFY 1995 as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997 (representing the sum of Column
B and Column C).
Column C ........................................
Column D ........................................
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
50364
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
CHART 4.—FINAL FFY 2003 IMD DSH LIMITS—Continued
[Key to the Chart of the FFY 2003 IMD Limitations]
Column
Description
Column E ........................................
Applicable Percentage Col. C/D. This column contains the ‘‘applicable percentage’’ representing the total
computable FFY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures divided by total computable all inpatient
hospital and mental health facility DSH expenditures for FFY 1995 (the amount in Column C divided by
the amount in Column D). Per section 1923(h)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Act, for FFYs after FY 2002, the applicable percentage can be no greater than 33 percent.
FY 2003 Federal Share DSH Allotment. This column contains the States’ final FFY 2003 DSH Allotments.
FFY 2003 FMAP.
FY 2003 DSH Allotment Total Computable Col. F/G. This column contains FFY 2003 total computable
DSH Allotment (determined as Column F/Column G).
Applicable Percent of FY 2003 DSH Allotment. Col. E x H. This column contains the applicable percent of
FFY 2003 total computable DSH Allotment (calculated as Column E x Column H).
FY 2003 IMD DSH Limit Total Computable Lesser of Col. C or I. The column contains the lesser of the
lesser of Column I or C.
FY 2003 IMD DSH Limit Federal Share, Col. G x J. This column contains the total computable IMD DSH
Limit from Col. J and converts that amount into a Federal share (calculated as Col. G x Col. J).
Column F ........................................
Column G ........................................
Column H ........................................
Column I ..........................................
Column J .........................................
Column K ........................................
CHART 5.—FINAL FFY 2004 IMD DSH LIMITS
[Key to the Chart of the FFY 2004 IMD Limitations.—The final FFY 2004 IMD DSH Limits for the regular States are presented in the top section
of this chart and the final FFY IMD DSH Limits for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of the chart.]
Column
Description
Column A ........................................
Column B ........................................
State.
Inpatient Hospital Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the States’ total computable FFY 1995 inpatient hospital DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64.
IMD and Mental Health Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the total computable
FFY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1,
1997.
Total Inpatient & IMD & Mental Health FY 95 DSH Total Computable, Col B + C. This column contains the
total computation of all inpatient hospital DSH expenditures and mental health facility DSH expenditures
for FFY 1995 as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997 (representing the sum of Column
B and Column C).
Applicable Percentage Col C/D. This column contains the ‘‘applicable percentage’’ representing the total
computable FFY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures divided by total computable all inpatient
hospital and mental health facility DSH expenditures for FFY 1995 (the amount in Column C divided by
the amount in Column D) Per section 1923(h)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Act, for FFYs after FY 2002, the applicable percentage can be no greater than 33 percent.
FY 2004 Federal Share DSH Allotment. This column contains the States’ final FFY 2004 DSH allotments.
FFY 2004 FMAP.
FY 2004 DSH Allotment Total Computable. Col. F/G. This column contains FFY 2004 total computable
DSH allotment (determined as Column F/Column G).
Applicable Percent of FY 2004 DSH Allotment. Col. E × H. This column contains the applicable percent of
FFY 2004 total computable DSH allotment (calculated as Column E × Column H).
FY 2004 IMD DSH Limit Total Computable. Lesser of Col. C or I. The column contains the lesser of the
lesser of Column I or C.
FY 2004 IMD DSH Limit Federal Share, Col. G × J. This column contains the total computable IMD DSH
Limit from Col. J and converts that amount into a Federal share (calculated as Col. G ×Col. J).
LOW DSH Status. This column contains Low DSH status for each State.
Column C ........................................
Column D ........................................
Column E ........................................
Column F ........................................
Column G ........................................
Column H ........................................
Column I ..........................................
Column J .........................................
Column K ........................................
Column L .........................................
CHART 6.—PRELIMINARY FFY 2005 IMD DSH LIMITS
[Key to the Chart of the FFY 2005 IMD Limitations.—The preliminary FFY 2005 IMD DSH Limits for the regular States are presented in the top
section of this chart and the preliminary FFY 2005 IMD DSH Limits for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of the chart.]
Column
Description
Column A ........................................
Column B ........................................
State.
Inpatient Hospital Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the States’ total computable FFY 1995 inpatient hospital DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64.
IMD and Mental Health Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the total computable
FFY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1,
1997.
Total Inpatient & IMD & Mental Health FY 95 DSH Total Computable, Col. B + C. This column contains the
total computation of all inpatient hospital DSH expenditures and mental health facility DSH expenditures
for FFY 1995 as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997 (representing the sum of Column
B and Column C).
Column C ........................................
Column D ........................................
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
50365
CHART 6.—PRELIMINARY FFY 2005 IMD DSH LIMITS—Continued
[Key to the Chart of the FFY 2005 IMD Limitations.—The preliminary FFY 2005 IMD DSH Limits for the regular States are presented in the top
section of this chart and the preliminary FFY 2005 IMD DSH Limits for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of the chart.]
Column
Description
Column E ........................................
Applicable Percentage Col. C/D. This column contains the ‘‘applicable percentage’’ representing the total
computable FFY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures divided by total computable all inpatient
hospital and mental health facility DSH expenditures for FFY 1995 (the amount in Column C divided by
the amount in Column D) Per section 1923(h)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Act, for FFYs after FY 2002, the applicable percentage can be no greater than 33 percent.
FY 2005 Federal Share DSH Allotment. This column contains the States’ final FFY 2005 DSH allotments.
FFY 2005 FMAP.
FY 2005 DSH Allotment Total Computable Col. F/G. This column contains FFY 2005 total computable
DSH allotment (determined as Column F/Column G).
Applicable Percent of FY 2005 DSH Allotment Col. E × H. This column contains the applicable percent of
FFY 2004 total computable DSH allotment (calculated as Column E × Column H)
FY 2005 IMD DSH Limit Total Computable. Lesser of Col. C or I. The column contains the lesser of the
lesser of Column I or C.
FY 2005 IMD DSH Limit Federal Share, Col. G × J. This column contains the total computable IMD DSH
Limit from Col. J and converts that amount into a Federal share (calculated as Col. G × Col. J).
Low DSH Status. This column contains Low DSH status for each State.
Column F ........................................
Column G ........................................
Column H ........................................
Column I ..........................................
Column J .........................................
Column K ........................................
Column L .........................................
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
EN26AU05.001
50366
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
50367
EN26AU05.002
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
EN26AU05.003
50368
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
50369
EN26AU05.004
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
EN26AU05.005
50370
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
50371
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
EN26AU05.006
BILLING CODE 4120–01–C
50372
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
Authority: Section 1923(a)(2), (f), and (h) of
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–
4(a)(2), (f), and (h), and Pub. L. 105–33).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program)
Dated: May 6, 2005.
Mark B. McClellan,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
Approved: May 20, 2005.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–16997 Filed 8–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–1309–NC]
Medicare and Medicaid Programs;
Announcement of an Application From
a Hospital Requesting Waiver for
Organ Procurement Service Area
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces a
hospital’s request for a waiver from
entering into an agreement with its
designated organ procurement
organization (OPO), in accordance with
section 1138(a)(2) of the Social Security
Act. This notice requests comments
from OPOs and the general public for
our consideration in determining
whether we should grant the requested
waiver.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. on October 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–1309–NC. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (no duplicates, please):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on specific issues
in this regulation to https://
www.cms.hhs.gov/regulations/
ecomments. (Attachments should be in
Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, or Excel;
however, we prefer Microsoft Word.)
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments (one original and two
copies) to the following address ONLY:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS–1309–
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
NC, P.O. Box 8015, Baltimore, MD
21244–8015.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–1309–NC, Mail Stop C4–26–05,
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments (one original
and two copies) before the close of the
comment period to one of the following
addresses. If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786–
9994 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Room 445–G, Hubert H. Humphrey
Building, 200 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20201; or 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
(Because access to the interior of the
HHH Building is not readily available to
persons without Federal Government
identification, commenters are
encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main
lobby of the building. A stamp-in clock
is available for persons wishing to retain
a proof of filing by stamping in and
retaining an extra copy of the comments
being filed.)
Comments mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark A. Horney, (410) 786–4554.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Submitting Comments: We welcome
comments from the public on all issues
set forth in this notice with comment
period to assist us in fully considering
issues and developing policies. You can
assist us by referencing the file code
CMS–1309–NC and the specific ‘‘issue
identifier’’ that precedes the section on
which you choose to comment.
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. CMS posts all electronic
comments received before the close of
the comment period on its public Web
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
site as soon as possible after they have
been received. Hard copy comments
received timely will be available for
public inspection as they are received,
generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of a document,
at the headquarters of the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21244, Monday through
Friday of each week from 8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to
view public comments, phone 1–800–
743–3951.
I. Background
[If you choose to comment on issues in
this section, please include the caption
‘‘BACKGROUND’’ at the beginning of
your comments.]
Organ Procurement Organizations
(OPOs) are not-for-profit organizations
that recover human organs from
potential donors in hospitals and
distribute them to transplant centers
throughout the country. Qualified OPOs
are designated by the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to
recover organs in CMS-defined
exclusive geographic service areas,
according to section 371(b)(1)(F) of the
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
273(b)(1)(F)) and our regulations at 42
CFR 486.307. Once an OPO has been
designated for an area, hospitals in that
area that participate in Medicare and
Medicaid are required to work with that
OPO in providing organs for transplant,
according to section 1138(a) of the
Social Security Act (the Act), and our
regulations at 42 CFR 482.45. Section
1138(a)(1)(A)(iii) of the Act provides
that a hospital must notify the
designated OPO (for the service area in
which it is located) of potential organ
donors. Under section 1138(a)(1)(C) of
the Act, every participating hospital
must have an agreement to identify
potential donors only with its
designated OPO.
However, section 1138(a)(2) of the Act
provides that a hospital may obtain a
waiver of the above requirements from
the Secretary under certain specified
conditions. A waiver allows the hospital
to have an agreement with an OPO other
than the one initially designated by
CMS, if the hospital meets certain
conditions specified in section
1138(a)(2) of the Act. In addition, the
Secretary may review additional criteria
described in section 1138(a)(2)(B) of the
Act to evaluate the hospital’s request for
a waiver.
Section 1138(a)(2)(A) of the Act states
that in granting a waiver, the Secretary
must determine that the waiver: (1) Is
expected to increase organ donations;
and (2) will ensure equitable treatment
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50358-50372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16997]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-2209-N]
RIN 0938-AJ74
Medicaid Program; Fiscal Year Disproportionate Share Hospital
Allotments and Disproportionate Share Hospital Institutions for Mental
Disease Limits
AGENCY: Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the final Federal share disproportionate
share hospital (DSH) allotments for Federal fiscal years (FFYs) 2003
and
[[Page 50359]]
2004, and the preliminary Federal share DSH allotments for FFY 2005. It
also announces the final FFYs 2003 and 2004, and the preliminary FFY
2005, limitations on aggregate DSH payments that States may make to
institutions for mental disease (IMDs) and other mental health
facilities. This notice also includes a background describing the
methodology for determining the amounts of States' FFY DSH allotments
for FFY 1998 and thereafter.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Strauss, (410) 786-2019.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) Allotments and Institutions
for Mental Disease (IMD) DSH Limits Published in the Federal Register
on October 8, 1998
We published a notice in the October 8, 1998 Federal Register (63
FR 54142) that announced the Federal share DSH allotments for FFYs 1998
through 2002 and the IMD DSH limits for FFYs 1998 and 1999. The DSH
allotments and IMD DSH limits published in that notice specified and
were determined in accordance with sections 1923(f) and 1923(h) of the
Social Security Act (the Act), as amended by the Balanced Budget Act of
1997 (BBA), Pub. L. 105-33 (enacted on August 5, 1997). The notice also
reflected the FFY 1998 DSH allotment for one State, specified in
accordance with section 601 of Pub. L. 105-78 (enacted on November 13,
1997).
Additional legislative changes relating to the amounts or
methodologies for calculating the States' DSH allotments or IMD DSH
limits were made to the Act since the publication of the October 8,
1998 notice. In this section and in section II of this notice, we
describe subsequent legislative changes related to the DSH calculation
of the DSH allotments and IMD DSH limits for fiscal years.
B. Disproportionate Share Hospital Allotments for Federal Fiscal Years
(FFYs) 1998 Through 2000
Section 4721(a) of the BBA amended section 1923(f) of the Act to
require that Federal Medicaid DSH expenditures be limited by the
statutorily defined Federal share DSH allotments for FFYs 1998 through
2002 specified in a chart in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act. Section 601
of Pub. L. 105-78 amended the DSH allotment contained in this chart for
the State of Minnesota for FFY 1998. On October 8, 1998, we published a
notice of the statutorily prescribed DSH allotments for all States for
FFYs 1998 through 2002, in accordance with the amounts specified in the
chart at section 1923(f)(2) of the Act, as established by the BBA and
as amended by Pub. L. 105-78. Subsequent to the publication of the DSH
allotments for these years, a number of legislative actions revised the
DSH allotments specified in the chart at section 1923(f)(2) of the Act,
for certain States. Specifically, sections 702, 703, and 704 of Pub. L.
105-277 (enacted on October 21, 1998) amended the FFY 1999 DSH
allotments for Minnesota, New Mexico, and Wyoming, respectively, and
section 601(a) of the Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP Balanced Budget
Refinement Act of 1999 (BBRA) (Pub. L. 106-113, enacted on November 29,
1999) amended the FFYs 2000, 2001, and 2002 DSH allotments for the
District of Columbia, Minnesota, New Mexico, and Wyoming.
C. DSH Allotments for FFYs 2001 and 2002
Section 701(a) of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits
Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 (BIPA) (Pub. L. 106-554, enacted
on December 21, 2000) added a new section 1923(f)(4) of the Act that
provided for a ``Special Rule for Fiscal Years 2001 and 2002,'' under
which States' DSH allotments for FFY 2001 and 2002 would be determined
through the application of a methodology. The DSH allotments for FFYs
2001 and 2002 as calculated under this methodology superseded the DSH
allotments for those years specified in the chart at section 1923(f)(2)
of the Act.
Under section 1923(f)(4) of the Act, the DSH allotments for FFY
2001 and FFY 2002 were determined by increasing the States' prior FFY
DSH allotments by the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers
(CPI-U) for the prior fiscal year, subject to the limitation that an
increase to a State's DSH allotment for a fiscal year could not result
in the DSH allotment exceeding the greater of the State's DSH allotment
for the previous fiscal year or 12 percent of the State's total medical
assistance expenditures for the allotment year (referred to as the 12
percent limit). For example, if increasing a State's FY 2001 DSH
allotment by the CPI-U for FY 2001 resulted in an amount that was
higher than 12 percent of the State's total medical assistance
expenditures for FY 2002, and the 12 percent limit was higher than the
States' FY 2001 DSH allotment, the State's FY 2002 DSH allotment would
be limited to the 12 percent limit. The application of this special
rule for FFY 2001 and FFY 2002 had the effect of increasing States' DSH
allotments for those years, as compared to the allotments they would
have received under the chart at section 1923(f)(2) of the Act. In
fact, the chart contained at section 1923(f)(2) of the Act generally
would have provided for a decrease or no change in States' DSH
allotments over the fiscal years 1998 through 2002.
BIPA also added a new section 1923(f)(5) of the Act (Pub. L. 106-
554 section 701(a)(2)), which established a ``Special Rule for
Extremely Low DSH States.'' Under this rule, States with FFY 1999 DSH
expenditures that were greater than zero percent and less than 1
percent of the States' FFY 1999 total medical assistance expenditures
were considered to be ``low-DSH States.'' Under section 1923(f)(5) of
the Act, the Low-DSH States' FFY 2001 DSH allotments were increased to
1 percent of the States' total FFY 2001 medical assistance
expenditures. The Low-DSH States' increased FFY 2001 DSH allotments
were the basis for calculating the States' FFY 2002 DSH allotments.
That is, similar to the methodology applied for determining the other
(non-Low-DSH) States' allotments, the Low-DSH States' FFY 2002
allotments were determined by increasing their FFY 2001 allotment (as
determined under the Low-DSH provision at section 1923(f)(5) of the
Act) by the CPI-U for the prior fiscal year, subject to the 12 percent
limit.
D. DSH Allotments for FFY 2003
Section 1923(f)(3) of the Act, as established by the BBA and
amended by the BIPA, provided for States' FFY 2003 DSH allotments to be
calculated by increasing their FFY 2002 allotments (as specified in the
chart in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act) by the CPI-U for the prior
fiscal year, subject to the 12 percent limit. That is, the FFY 2003
allotments were not based on the FFY 2002 DSH allotments as were
determined under section 1923(f)(4) of the Act. Since the FFY 2002 DSH
allotments specified in the chart in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act were
lower than the actual FFY 2002 DSH allotments (determined under section
1923(f)(4) of the Act), in general, States' FFY 2003 DSH allotments
were lower than their FFY 2002 allotments. The exception to this were
the FFY 2003 DSH allotments for the Low-DSH States. Under the Low-DSH
State provision, the Low-DSH States' FFY 2003 allotments were
determined by increasing their actual FFY 2002 DSH allotments (not
their FFY 2002 allotments specified in the chart in section 1923(f)(2)
of the Act) by the CPI-U for the previous fiscal year. Therefore, Low-
DSH States' DSH
[[Page 50360]]
allotments increased (in general by the CPI-U) from FFY 2002 to FFY
2003.
E. DSH Allotments for FFY 2004
Section 1001(a) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) (Pub. L. 108-173, enacted on December
8, 2003) amended section 1923(f)(3) of the Act to provide for a
``Special, Temporary Increase In Allotments On A One-Time, Non-
Cumulative Basis.'' Under this provision, States' FFY 2004 DSH
allotments were determined by increasing their FFY 2003 allotments by
16 percent, and the fiscal year DSH allotment amounts so determined
were not subject to the 12 percent limit.
F. DSH Allotments for Non-Low DSH States for FFY 2005, and Fiscal Years
Thereafter
Under the methodology contained in section 1923(f)(3)(C) of the
Act, as amended by the MMA, the non-Low-DSH States' DSH allotments for
FFY 2005 and subsequent fiscal years continues at the same level as the
States' DSH allotments for FFY 2004 until a ``fiscal year specified''
occurs. The ``fiscal year specified'' is the first fiscal year for
which the Secretary estimates that a State's DSH allotment equals (or
no longer exceeds) the DSH allotment as would have been determined
under the statute in effect before the enactment of the MMA. We
determine whether the fiscal year specified has occurred under a
special parallel process. Specifically, under this process, a DSH
allotment is determined for FFYs after 2003 by increasing the State's
DSH allotment for the previous fiscal year by the CPI-U for the prior
fiscal year, subject to the 12 percent limit. The fiscal year specified
will be the fiscal year when the DSH allotment calculated under this
special parallel process finally equals or exceeds the FY 2004 DSH
allotment, as determined under the MMA provisions. Once the fiscal year
specified occurs for a State, that State's fiscal year DSH allotment
will be calculated by increasing the State's previous actual fiscal
year DSH allotment (which would be equal to the FY 2004 DSH allotment)
by the CPI-U, subject to the 12 percent limit. The following example
illustrates how the fiscal year DSH allotment would be calculated for
fiscal years after FFY 2004.
Example --A State's FFY 2003 DSH allotment is $100 million.
Under the MMA, the State's FFY 2004 DSH allotment would be $116
million ($100 million increased by 16 percent). The State's DSH
allotment for subsequent fiscal years would continue at $116 million
for fiscal years following FFY 2004 until the ``fiscal year
specified'' occurs. In a separate parallel process, we determine
whether the fiscal year specified has occurred by calculating the
State's DSH allotments in accordance with the statute in effect
before the enactment of the MMA. Under this special process, we
determine the State's DSH allotment each fiscal year by increasing
the State's DSH allotment for the previous fiscal year (as also
determined under the special parallel process) by the CPI-U for the
previous fiscal year, and subject to the 12 percent limit. Assume
for purposes of this example that, in accordance with this special
process, the State's FFY 2007 DSH allotment was determined to be
$115 million and the CPI-U for FFY 2007 was 2 percent. Therefore,
under the special parallel process, the State's FFY 2008 DSH
allotment would be $117.3 million (that is, $115 million increased
by the 2 percent CPI-U for FFY 2007). Since $117.3 is greater than
$116 million (the FFY 2004 DSH allotment calculated under the MMA),
we would determine that FFY 2008 is the ``fiscal year specified.''
We would then determine the State's FFY 2008 allotment as the FFY
2007 actual allotment ($116 million) increased by the CPI-U for FFY
2007 (2 percent). Therefore, the State's FFY 2008 DSH allotment
would be $118.32 million ($116 million increased by 2 percent); for
purposes of this example, the application of the 12 percent limit
has no effect. For FFY 2009 and thereafter, the State's DSH
allotment would be calculated by increasing the previous fiscal
year's DSH allotment by the CPI-U, subject to the 12 percent limit.
However, as amended by the MMA, section 1923(f)(5)(B) of the Act
contains new criteria for determining whether a State is a Low-DSH
State, beginning with FFY 2004. This provision is described in section
I.G below.
G. DSH Allotments For Low-DSH States for FFYs 2004, and Fiscal Years
Thereafter
The MMA amended section 1923(f)(5) of the Act regarding the
calculation of the fiscal year DSH allotments for ``Low-DSH'' States
for FFY 2004 and subsequent fiscal years. Specifically, under section
1923(f)(5)(B) of the Act, as amended by the MMA, a State is considered
a Low-DSH State for FFY 2004 if its total DSH payments under its State
plan for FFY 2000 (including Federal and State shares) as reported to
us as of August 31, 2003, are greater than 0 percent and less than 3
percent of the State's total FFY 2000 expenditures under its State plan
for medical assistance. For States that meet the new Low-DSH criteria,
their FFY 2004 DSH allotments are calculated by increasing their FFY
2003 DSH allotments by 16 percent. Therefore, for FFY 2004, Low-DSH
States' fiscal year DSH allotments are calculated in the same way as
the DSH allotments for regular States, which under the Act section
1923(f)(3) get the special temporary increase for FFY 2004.
Furthermore, for States meeting the new MMA Low-DSH definition, the
DSH allotments for FFYs 2005 through 2008 will continue to be
determined by increasing the previous fiscal year's DSH allotment by 16
percent. The Low-DSH States' DSH allotments for FFYs 2004 through 2008
are not subject to the 12 percent limit. The Low-DSH States' DSH
allotments for FFYs 2009 and subsequent fiscal years are calculated by
increasing those States' DSH allotments for the prior fiscal year by
the CPI-U for that prior fiscal year. For FFYs 2009 and thereafter, the
DSH allotments so determined would be subject to the 12 percent limit.
H. IMD DSH Limits for FFYs 1998 and Thereafter
Section 4721(b) of the BBA added section 1923(h) to the Act which
provides that Federal financial participation (FFP) is not available
for DSH payments to IMDs and other mental health facilities that are in
excess of State-specific aggregate limits.
In implementing the IMD DSH limit under the BBA in the October 8,
1998 Federal Register notice as codified in section 1923(h)(1) of the
Act, we indicated that the aggregate limit of IMD and other mental
health facilities to be the lesser of a State's FFY 1995 total
computable (State and Federal share) IMD and other mental health
facility DSH expenditures applicable to the State's FFY 1995 DSH
allotment (as reported on the Form CMS-64 as of January 1, 1997), or
the amount equal to the product of the State's current year total
computable DSH allotment and the applicable percentage.
Each State's IMD limit on DSH payments to IMDs and other mental
health facilities is calculated by first determining the State's total
computable DSH expenditures attributable to the FFY 1995 DSH allotment
for mental health facilities and inpatient hospitals. This was based on
the total computable DSH expenditures reported by the State on the Form
CMS-64 as mental health DSH and inpatient hospital as of January 1,
1997.
Once we determine the total computable amount of DSH expenditures
applicable to the FFY 1995 DSH allotment, we then calculate an
``applicable percentage.'' The applicable percentage for FFY 1998
through FFY 2000 (1995 IMD DSH percentage) is calculated by dividing
the total computable amount of IMD and mental health DSH expenditures
applicable to the State's FFY 1995 DSH allotment by the total
computable amount of all DSH
[[Page 50361]]
expenditures (mental health facility plus inpatient hospital)
applicable to the FFY 1995 DSH allotment. For FFY 2001 and thereafter,
the applicable percentage is defined as the lesser of the applicable
percentage as calculated above (for FFYs 1998 through 2001) or 50
percent for FFY 2001; 40 percent for FFY 2002; and 33 percent for each
subsequent FFY.
The applicable percentage is then applied to each State's total
computable FFY DSH allotment for the current FFY. The State's total
computable FFY DSH allotment is calculated by dividing the State's
Federal share DSH allotment for the FFY by the State's Federal medical
assistance percentage (FMAP) for that FFY.
In the final step of the calculation, the State's total computable
IMD DSH limit for the FFY is set at the lesser of the product of a
State's current fiscal year total computable DSH allotment and the
applicable percentage for that fiscal year, or the State's FFY 1995
total computable IMD and other mental health facility DSH expenditures
applicable to the State's FFY 1995 DSH allotment as reported on the
Form CMS-64.
The MMA legislation did not amend the Medicaid statute with respect
to the calculation of the IMD DSH limit.
I. DSH Allotments and IMD DSH Limits Published in the Federal Register
on March 26, 2004
On March 26, 2004, we published in the Federal Register (69 FR
15850) the final Federal share DSH allotments for FFYs 2001 and 2002,
and the preliminary Federal share DSH allotments for FFY 2003 (as
determined under the Medicaid statute in effect before the enactment of
the MMA). The March 26, 2004 notice also announced the preliminary FFY
2004 Federal share DSH allotments (as determined under the MMA
provisions).
The March 26, 2004 Federal Register notice also announced the final
FFYs 2000, 2001, and 2002, and the preliminary FFYs 2003 and 2004,
limitations on aggregate DSH payments that States may make to IMDs and
other mental health facilities.
The March 26, 2004 Federal Register notice also described the
methodologies for determining the amounts of States' FFY DSH allotments
for FFY 2001 and thereafter, and it republished the Federal share DSH
allotments for FFYs 1998 through 2000, and the final FFYs 1998 and 1999
limitations on aggregate DSH payments that States may make to IMDs and
other mental health facilities.
J. Publication in the Federal Register of Preliminary and Final Notice
for DSH Allotments and IMD DSH Limits
In general, we initially determine States' DSH allotments and IMD
DSH limits for a fiscal year using estimates of medical assistance
expenditures, including DSH expenditures in their Medicaid programs.
These estimates are provided by States each year on the August
quarterly Medicaid budget reports (Form CMS-37) before the Federal
fiscal year for which the DSH allotments and IMD DSH limits are being
determined. The DSH allotments and IMD DSH limits determined using
these estimates are referred to as ``preliminary.'' Only after we
receive States' reports of the actual related medical assistance
expenditures through the quarterly expenditure report (Form CMS-64),
are the ``final'' DSH Allotments and IMD DSH limits determined. In this
regard, the DSH allotments for FFY 1998 through FFY 2000, as published
in the October 8, 1998 Federal Register notice were considered as final
since these allotments were prescribed in the chart in section
1923(f)(2) of the Act. Similarly, the FFY 1998 and FFY 1999 IMD DSH
limits published in the October 8, 1998 Federal Register were also
considered as final, since these limits were based on the actual
expenditures from FFY 1995 and the final FFY 1998 and FFY 1999 DSH
allotments.
As indicated in the previous paragraph I, the notice published in
the Federal Register on March 26, 2004 announced the final FFY 2001 and
2002 DSH allotments (since they were based on the actual related
expenditures), the preliminary FFY 2003 and 2004 DSH allotments (since
they were based on estimated expenditures), the final FFY 2000 through
2002 IMD DSH limits (based on the final DSH allotments for those fiscal
years), and the preliminary FFY 2003 and 2004 IMD DSH limits (since
they were based on the preliminary DSH allotments for those years).
This notice announces the final FFYs 2003 and 2004 DSH allotments
and the final FFYs 2003 and 2004 IMD DSH limits (since they are based
on the actual related expenditures), the preliminary FFY 2005 DSH
allotments (based on estimates), and the preliminary IMD DSH limits
(since they are based on the preliminary DSH allotments for FFY 2005).
II. Calculation of the Final FFY 2003 Federal Share State DSH
Allotments, the Final FFY 2004 Federal Share State DSH Allotments, and
the Preliminary FFY 2005 Federal Share State DSH Allotments
Charts 1 and 2 of the Addendum to this notice provide the States'
``final'' FFY 2003 and FFY 2004 DSH allotments. The final FFY 2003 DSH
allotments for each State were computed using the States' expenditure
reports (Form CMS-64) for FFY 2003. As required by the provisions of
the MMA, the final FFY 2004 DSH allotments for the ``Low-DSH'' States
and all the other States were calculated by increasing the FFY 2003 DSH
allotments by 16 percent. The definition and determination of the
``Low-DSH'' States under the MMA provisions were explained and
published in the March 26, 2004 Federal Register notice.
Chart 3 of the Addendum to this notice provides the States'
``preliminary'' FFY 2005 DSH allotments. These preliminary allotments
were determined using the States' August 2004 expenditure estimates
submitted by the States on the Form CMS-37. We will publish the final
FFY 2005 DSH allotments for each State following receipt of the States'
four quarterly Medicaid expenditure reports (Form CMS-64) for FFY 2005.
As discussed earlier in this notice, the criteria and determination of
the ``Low-DSH'' States were also explained and published in the March
26, 2004 Federal Register notice.
III. Calculation of the FFYs 2000 Through 2005 IMD DSH Limits
Section 1923(h) of the Act specifies the methodology to be used to
establish the limits on the amount of DSH payments that a State can
make to IMDs and other mental health facilities. FFP is not available
for IMD/DSH payments that exceed the lesser of the State's FFY 1995
total computable mental health DSH expenditures applicable to the
State's FFY 1995 DSH allotment as reported to us on the Form CMS-64 as
of January 1, 1997; or the amount equal to the product of the State's
current FFY total computable DSH allotment and the applicable
percentage. The amounts of the limits on IMD DSH expenditures were made
available to the States as part of their CMS-64 report. We are
publishing the final FFY 2003 and FFY 2004 IMD DSH limit limits, and
the preliminary FFY 2005 IMD DSH limit along with an explanation of the
calculation of these limits.
[[Page 50362]]
For FFY 2000, the applicable percentage was computed as the ratio
of--
(1) The State's FFY 1995 total computable (Federal and State share)
mental health DSH payments applicable to the State's FFY 1995 DSH
allotment and as reported on the Form CMS-64 as of January 1, 1997;
compared to
(2) The State's FFY 1995 total computable amount of all DSH
expenditures (mental health facility and inpatient hospital) applicable
to the State's FFY 1995 DSH allotment as reported on the Form CMS-64 as
of January 1, 1997.
For FFY 2000, the applicable percentage was calculated and applied
to the State's FFY 2000 total computable DSH allotment. States' total
computable FFY 2000 DSH allotment was calculated by dividing each
State's Federal share DSH allotment for FFY 2000 by the State's Federal
medical assistance percentage (FMAP) for FFY 2000. This result was then
compared to the State's FFY 1995 total computable mental health DSH
expenditures applicable to the State's FFY 1995 DSH allotment as
reported on the Form CMS-64 as of January 1, 1997. The lesser of these
two amounts was the State's limitation on total computable IMD/DSH
expenditures for FFY 2000.
For FFY 2001, the applicable percentage was the lesser of 50
percent or the 1995 DSH IMD percentage of the amount computed for FFY
2000.
This percentage was applied to the State's FFY 2001 total
computable DSH allotment. This result was then compared to the State's
FFY 1995 total computable mental health DSH expenditures applicable to
the State's FFY 1995 DSH allotment as reported on the Form CMS-64 as of
January 1, 1997. The lesser of these two amounts was the State's
limitation on total computable IMD/DSH expenditures for FFY 2001.
For FFY 2002, the applicable percentage was the lesser of 40
percent or the 1995 DSH IMD percentage of the amount computed for FFY
2000. This percentage was applied to the State's FFY 2002 total
computable DSH allotment. This result was then compared to the State's
FFY 1995 total computable mental health DSH expenditures applicable to
the State's FFY 1995 DSH allotment as reported on the Form CMS-64 as of
January 1, 1997. The lesser of these two amounts was the State's
limitation on total computable IMD/DSH expenditures for FFY 2002.
For FFY 2003 and following fiscal years, the applicable percentage
was the lesser of 33 percent or the 1995 DSH IMD percentage of the
amount computed for FFY 2000. This percentage was applied to the
State's fiscal year total computable DSH allotment. This result was
then compared to the State's FFY 1995 total computable mental health
DSH expenditures applicable to the State's FFY 1995 DSH allotment as
reported on the Form CMS-64 as of January 1, 1997. The lesser of these
two amounts was the State's limitation on total computable IMD/DSH
expenditures for FFY 2003 and following fiscal years.
Charts 4 through 6 of the Addendum to this notice detail each
State's final IMD/DSH limitation for FFYs 2003 and 2004, and the
preliminary IMD/DSH limitation for FFY 2005, respectively, in
accordance with section 1923(h) of the Act.
IV. Collection of Information Requirements
This document does not impose information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. Consequently, it need not be reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501).
V. Regulatory Impact Statement
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 through 612,
requires a regulatory flexibility analysis for every rule subject to
proposed rulemaking procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act,
5 U.S.C. 553, unless we certify that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
For purposes of the RFA, States and individuals are not considered
small entities. However, providers with receipts ranging from less than
$6 million to less than $29 million depending on their provider type
are considered small entities (65 FR 69432, November 17, 2000). Due to
the various controlling statutes, the effects on providers are not a
result of any independent regulatory impact and not this notice. The
purpose of the notice is to simply announce the latest distributions as
required by the statute.
Additionally, section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a
regulatory impact analysis if a notice may have a significant impact on
the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. Such
an analysis must conform to the provisions of section 604 of the RFA.
For purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small rural
hospital as a hospital that is located outside of a Metropolitan
Statistical Area and has fewer than 100 beds.
The BBA and the BBRA set statutorily defined limits on the amount
of Federal share DSH expenditures available for FFYs 1998 through 2002.
The BIPA amended sections of the Act that set forth these
statutorily defined Federal DSH allotments.
Based on these amendments to the DSH allotment provisions of the
Medicaid statute, the limits initially imposed by the BBA and the BBRA
had a negative impact on the availability of FFP to States by reducing
the DSH allotments available to States, thus potentially negatively
impacting the availability of Medicaid expenditures to hospitals,
especially IMDs. However, the BIPA reduced the Federal savings, thus
increasing the amount of Federal funding available to States under the
DSH program. Finally, section 1001 of the MMA increased the DSH
allotment for States beginning with fiscal year 2004. While overall the
statute mandated some reduction in DSH payments, we do not believe that
this notice will have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it reflects no new policies or
procedures.
In section 202, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act requires that
agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits for
any rule that may result in an annual expenditure by State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $110
million or more. This notice has no consequential effect on State,
local, or tribal governments, or the private sector, and will not
create an unfunded mandate.
We have reviewed this notice under the threshold criteria of
Executive Order 13132, Federalism. We have determined that it does not
significantly affect the rights, roles, and responsibilities of States.
In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this
notice was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
Addendum
This addendum contains the charts 1 through 6 (including associated
keys) that are referred to in the preamble of this notice.
[[Page 50363]]
Chart 1.--Final 2003 DSH Allotments
[Key to the chart of the final FFY 2003 DSH Allotments]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column Description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column A.......................... State
Column B.......................... FY 2003 FMAPS--FFY 2003 Federal
Medical Assistance Percentage
(FMAP).
Column C.......................... FY 2002 Federal Share DSH Allotment--
This column contains the final FFY
2002 DSH allotments from section
1923(f)(2) of the Act.
Column D.......................... FY 2002 DSH Allotment INCR. By CPIU.
This column contains the FFY 2002
DSH allotments in Column C
increased by the CPIU for that
fiscal year.
Column E.......................... FY 2003 TC MAP EXP including DSH.
This column contains the total
computable medical assistance
expenditures including DSH for FFY
2003.
Column F.......................... FY 2003 TC DSH Expenditures. This
column contains the actual total
computable DSH expenditures for FFY
2003.
Column G.......................... FY 2003 TC MAP EXP. Net of DSH. This
column contains the total
computable medical assistance
expenditures, net of DSH
expenditures, for FFY 2003.
Column H.......................... 12 Percent Limit (IN FS). This
column contains the 12 Percent
Limit; this is a Federal share
amount.
Column I.......................... Greater of COL H OR COL C. This
column contains an amount which is
the greater of Column H (the 12
percent limit) or Column C (the
Federal share FFY 2002 DSH
allotment).
Column J.......................... FY 2003 DSH Allotments Federal
Share. This column contains the
lesser of Column I or Column D This
is the final Federal share DSH
Allotment for FY 2003.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chart 2.--Final DSH Allotments for Fiscal Year 2004
[Key to the chart of the final FFY 2004 DSH Allotments. The final FFY
2004 DSH allotments for the regular States are presented in the top
section of this chart and the final FFY 2004 DSH allotments for the Low-
DSH States are presented in the bottom section of the chart.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column Description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column A.......................... State.
Column B.......................... FY 2003 Final Federal Share DSH
Allotment. This column contains the
final FFY 2003 DSH allotments.
Column C.......................... FY 2004 FS DSH Allotment = COL B x
116. This column contains the FFY
2003 DSH allotments in Column C
increased by 16 percent.
Column D.......................... MMA Low DSH Status. This column
indicates the LOW DSH Status of
each State.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chart 3.--Preliminary DSH Allotments for FY 2005
[Key to the Chart of the Preliminary FFY 2005 DSH Allotments. The
preliminary FFY 2005 DSH Allotments for the regular States are presented
in the top section of this chart and the preliminary FFY 2005 DSH
Allotments for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of
the chart.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column Description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Non-Low-DSH States:
Column A...................... State.
Column B...................... Final FY 2004 DSH Allotment Federal
Share--This column contains the
final FFY 2004 DSH Allotments.
Column C...................... FY 2005 DSH Allotment Federal Share--
This column contains the
preliminary FFY 2005 DSH
Allotments.
Column D...................... MMA Low-DSH Status--This column
indicates the MMA Low-DSH Status of
each State.
For Low-DSH States:
Column A...................... State.
Column B...................... Prior FY DSH Allotment--This column
contains the final FFY 2004 DSH
Allotments.
Column C...................... FY 2005 DSH Allotments Federal
Share--This column contains the
preliminary FFY 2005 DSH Allotments
= Column B multiplied by 1.16.
Column D...................... MMA Low-DSH Status--This column
indicates the MMA Low-DSH Status of
each State.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chart 4.--Final FFY 2003 IMD DSH Limits
[Key to the Chart of the FFY 2003 IMD Limitations]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column Description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column A.......................... State.
Column B.......................... Inpatient Hospital Services FY 95
DSH Total Computable. This column
contains the States' total
computable FFY 1995 inpatient
hospital DSH expenditures as
reported on the Form CMS-64.
Column C.......................... IMD and Mental Health Services FY 95
DSH Total Computable. This column
contains the total computable FFY
1995 mental health facility DSH
expenditures as reported on the
Form CMS-64 as of January 1, 1997.
Column D.......................... Total Inpatient & IMD & Mental
Health FY 95 DSH Total Computable,
Col. B + C. This column contains
the total computation of all
inpatient hospital DSH expenditures
and mental health facility DSH
expenditures for FFY 1995 as
reported on the Form CMS-64 as of
January 1, 1997 (representing the
sum of Column B and Column C).
[[Page 50364]]
Column E.......................... Applicable Percentage Col. C/D. This
column contains the ``applicable
percentage'' representing the total
computable FFY 1995 mental health
facility DSH expenditures divided
by total computable all inpatient
hospital and mental health facility
DSH expenditures for FFY 1995 (the
amount in Column C divided by the
amount in Column D). Per section
1923(h)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Act,
for FFYs after FY 2002, the
applicable percentage can be no
greater than 33 percent.
Column F.......................... FY 2003 Federal Share DSH Allotment.
This column contains the States'
final FFY 2003 DSH Allotments.
Column G.......................... FFY 2003 FMAP.
Column H.......................... FY 2003 DSH Allotment Total
Computable Col. F/G. This column
contains FFY 2003 total computable
DSH Allotment (determined as Column
F/Column G).
Column I.......................... Applicable Percent of FY 2003 DSH
Allotment. Col. E x H. This column
contains the applicable percent of
FFY 2003 total computable DSH
Allotment (calculated as Column E x
Column H).
Column J.......................... FY 2003 IMD DSH Limit Total
Computable Lesser of Col. C or I.
The column contains the lesser of
the lesser of Column I or C.
Column K.......................... FY 2003 IMD DSH Limit Federal Share,
Col. G x J. This column contains
the total computable IMD DSH Limit
from Col. J and converts that
amount into a Federal share
(calculated as Col. G x Col. J).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chart 5.--Final FFY 2004 IMD DSH Limits
[Key to the Chart of the FFY 2004 IMD Limitations.--The final FFY 2004
IMD DSH Limits for the regular States are presented in the top section
of this chart and the final FFY IMD DSH Limits for the Low-DSH States
are presented in the bottom section of the chart.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column Description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column A.......................... State.
Column B.......................... Inpatient Hospital Services FY 95
DSH Total Computable. This column
contains the States' total
computable FFY 1995 inpatient
hospital DSH expenditures as
reported on the Form CMS-64.
Column C.......................... IMD and Mental Health Services FY 95
DSH Total Computable. This column
contains the total computable FFY
1995 mental health facility DSH
expenditures as reported on the
Form CMS-64 as of January 1, 1997.
Column D.......................... Total Inpatient & IMD & Mental
Health FY 95 DSH Total Computable,
Col B + C. This column contains the
total computation of all inpatient
hospital DSH expenditures and
mental health facility DSH
expenditures for FFY 1995 as
reported on the Form CMS-64 as of
January 1, 1997 (representing the
sum of Column B and Column C).
Column E.......................... Applicable Percentage Col C/D. This
column contains the ``applicable
percentage'' representing the total
computable FFY 1995 mental health
facility DSH expenditures divided
by total computable all inpatient
hospital and mental health facility
DSH expenditures for FFY 1995 (the
amount in Column C divided by the
amount in Column D) Per section
1923(h)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Act,
for FFYs after FY 2002, the
applicable percentage can be no
greater than 33 percent.
Column F.......................... FY 2004 Federal Share DSH Allotment.
This column contains the States'
final FFY 2004 DSH allotments.
Column G.......................... FFY 2004 FMAP.
Column H.......................... FY 2004 DSH Allotment Total
Computable. Col. F/G. This column
contains FFY 2004 total computable
DSH allotment (determined as Column
F/Column G).
Column I.......................... Applicable Percent of FY 2004 DSH
Allotment. Col. E x H. This column
contains the applicable percent of
FFY 2004 total computable DSH
allotment (calculated as Column E x
Column H).
Column J.......................... FY 2004 IMD DSH Limit Total
Computable. Lesser of Col. C or I.
The column contains the lesser of
the lesser of Column I or C.
Column K.......................... FY 2004 IMD DSH Limit Federal Share,
Col. G x J. This column contains
the total computable IMD DSH Limit
from Col. J and converts that
amount into a Federal share
(calculated as Col. G xCol. J).
Column L.......................... LOW DSH Status. This column contains
Low DSH status for each State.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chart 6.--Preliminary FFY 2005 IMD DSH Limits
[Key to the Chart of the FFY 2005 IMD Limitations.--The preliminary FFY
2005 IMD DSH Limits for the regular States are presented in the top
section of this chart and the preliminary FFY 2005 IMD DSH Limits for
the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of the chart.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column Description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column A.......................... State.
Column B.......................... Inpatient Hospital Services FY 95
DSH Total Computable. This column
contains the States' total
computable FFY 1995 inpatient
hospital DSH expenditures as
reported on the Form CMS-64.
Column C.......................... IMD and Mental Health Services FY 95
DSH Total Computable. This column
contains the total computable FFY
1995 mental health facility DSH
expenditures as reported on the
Form CMS-64 as of January 1, 1997.
Column D.......................... Total Inpatient & IMD & Mental
Health FY 95 DSH Total Computable,
Col. B + C. This column contains
the total computation of all
inpatient hospital DSH expenditures
and mental health facility DSH
expenditures for FFY 1995 as
reported on the Form CMS-64 as of
January 1, 1997 (representing the
sum of Column B and Column C).
[[Page 50365]]
Column E.......................... Applicable Percentage Col. C/D. This
column contains the ``applicable
percentage'' representing the total
computable FFY 1995 mental health
facility DSH expenditures divided
by total computable all inpatient
hospital and mental health facility
DSH expenditures for FFY 1995 (the
amount in Column C divided by the
amount in Column D) Per section
1923(h)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Act,
for FFYs after FY 2002, the
applicable percentage can be no
greater than 33 percent.
Column F.......................... FY 2005 Federal Share DSH Allotment.
This column contains the States'
final FFY 2005 DSH allotments.
Column G.......................... FFY 2005 FMAP.
Column H.......................... FY 2005 DSH Allotment Total
Computable Col. F/G. This column
contains FFY 2005 total computable
DSH allotment (determined as Column
F/Column G).
Column I.......................... Applicable Percent of FY 2005 DSH
Allotment Col. E x H. This column
contains the applicable percent of
FFY 2004 total computable DSH
allotment (calculated as Column E x
Column H)
Column J.......................... FY 2005 IMD DSH Limit Total
Computable. Lesser of Col. C or I.
The column contains the lesser of
the lesser of Column I or C.
Column K.......................... FY 2005 IMD DSH Limit Federal Share,
Col. G x J. This column contains
the total computable IMD DSH Limit
from Col. J and converts that
amount into a Federal share
(calculated as Col. G x Col. J).
Column L.......................... Low DSH Status. This column contains
Low DSH status for each State.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
[[Page 50366]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26AU05.001
[[Page 50367]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26AU05.002
[[Page 50368]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26AU05.003
[[Page 50369]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26AU05.004
[[Page 50370]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26AU05.005
[[Page 50371]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26AU05.006
BILLING CODE 4120-01-C
[[Page 50372]]
Authority: Section 1923(a)(2), (f), and (h) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-4(a)(2), (f), and (h), and Pub. L.
105-33).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical
Assistance Program)
Dated: May 6, 2005.
Mark B. McClellan,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Approved: May 20, 2005.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-16997 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P