Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and to Conduct Public Scoping for the West Tavaputs Natural Gas Full Field Development Plan, Carbon and Duchesne Counties, UT, 50399-50401 [05-16953]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[UT–070–1310–00]
Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and to Conduct Public Scoping for the
West Tavaputs Natural Gas Full Field
Development Plan, Carbon and
Duchesne Counties, UT
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent (NOI) to
conduct public scoping and prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the West Tavaputs Natural Gas Full
Field Development Plan, Carbon and
Duchesne Counties, UT.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969, the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), Price Field Office,
Price, Utah, will prepare an EIS on the
impacts of efficient and orderly
development of the natural gas
resources in the West Tavaputs Plateau
area on approximately 137,700 acres of
public, state, and private lands in
Carbon and Duchesne Counties in
eastern Utah, as well as considering a
site-specific development proposal on a
portion of the West Tavaputs Plateau
area. The Price Field Office Manager
will be the authorized officer for this
project.
A public scoping period of at
least 30 days will commence on the date
this notice is published in the Federal
Register. If you have any information,
data or concerns related to the potential
impacts of the proposed action, or have
suggestions for additional alternatives,
or have comments on the proposed
planning amendment criteria, please
submit them to the address listed below
within 30 days of the date this Notice
is published, or within 15 days after the
last public meeting is held. Public open
houses and informational meetings will
be conducted during the scoping period
in Price, Roosevelt, and Salt Lake City,
Utah. Details on these meetings will be
publicized in the respective city’s
newspapers at least 15 days prior to
their scheduled dates.
ADDRESSES: Written scoping comments
should be sent to: Field Manager,
Bureau of Land Management, Price
Field Office, 125 South 600 West, Price,
Utah 84501, ATTN: West Tavaputs
Natural Gas Full Field Development
Plan. Comments, including names and
street addresses of respondents will be
available for public review at the BLM
Price Field Office and will be subject to
DATES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). They may be
published as part of the EIS and other
related documents. Individual
respondents may request
confidentiality. If you wish to withhold
your name or street address from public
review and disclosure under the FOIA,
you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your written comment.
Such requests will be honored to the
extent allowed by law. All submissions
from organizations or businesses will be
made available for public inspection in
their entirety.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
O’Ferrall, (435) 636–3607.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Bill
Barrett Corporation (BBC), together with
some other lessees, has submitted a
proposal to develop the natural gas
resources on leased lands under their
control in the West Tavaputs Plateau
area. The BLM has determined that a
comprehensive plan for full field
development of the natural gas
resources in the larger field area would
allow more flexibility. A more
comprehensive area analysis will reduce
the need for redundant future analyses,
since the analysis of the comprehensive
plan would also evaluate the impacts of
other development proposals on
existing lessees in the area and the
impacts of development on lands not
currently under lease. The EIS will
consider and analyze potential impacts
of natural gas development at the levels
projected by BBC or as refined during
the scoping process on both leased and
unleased lands in the entire West
Tavaputs Plateau area. This analysis
will include a site-specific evaluation of
BBC’s proposal under an appropriate
range of alternatives, and will also
consider mitigation measures as
Conditions of Approval under which
the development may take place.
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action is to consider
and determine the conditions under
which full field development of natural
gas resources within the West Tavaputs
area (an area larger than, but
encompassing, BBC’s ‘‘project area’’)
would be approved. The BLM
anticipates analyzing the proposed
action and also intends to rely on this
EIS to evaluate and, if appropriate,
approve site-specific individual drilling
applications and right-of-way
authorizations, where applicants (such
as, BBC) can provide sufficiently
detailed information for inclusion into
this process. The development plan
proposal includes multiple wells, roads,
access routes, production facilities, and
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50399
utilities. The total number of wells
ultimately drilled for field development
depends on many factors, such as
reservoir properties, production success,
per well recovery, emergent engineering
technologies, economic factors,
availability of commodity markets, and
lease stipulations and restrictions.
Site-Specific Project Proposal by BBC
and Others
The project area identified by BBC
encompassing approximately 137,700
acres, is located approximately 25 miles
east of Price, Utah and 60 miles
southwest of Vernal, Utah and is within
Carbon and Duchesne Counties in
Eastern Utah. The full field
development area/EIS involves
approximately 87% BLM-administered
lands (119,661 acres); 8% State of Utahadministered lands (10,434 acres); and
5% private mineral land (7,605 acres).
Approximately 98 percent of the BBC
proposed project is located on the top of
the West Tavaputs plateau. The
remaining area, approximately two
percent, is proposed to be located in the
narrow canyon bottoms of the Nine Mile
Canyon region and in portions of Jack
Canyon and Desolation Canyon
Wilderness Study Areas, on existing
Federal leases with valid existing rights.
The long-term BBC proposal for full
development (along with other
operators) of their mineral leases
includes drilling up to 750 new wells
(Federal, state and private minerals) on
a maximum of 500 surface locations
over a period of 20 years or until such
date as the resource base is fully
developed. The number of wells drilled
each year would average about 30,
although peak activity in any one year
might reach 70 or more wells. The BBC
development proposal contemplates
some year-round drilling which would
require applications for one-time
exceptions and/or waiver of existing
lease stipulations imposed to protect
seasonal range habitat for elk, mule deer
and bighorn sheep.
Preliminary estimates anticipate that
the amount of surface disturbance will
range from two to four thousand acres
out of the 137,700 acre full field
development area and that the projected
field life will be 40 or more years.
Directional and other drilling
techniques are included in BBC’s
proposal and will also be used, as
appropriate, throughout the area to keep
the number of surface locations to the
minimum necessary to effectively and
efficiently recover the hydrocarbon
resources (BBC is proposing 750 wells
from 500 surface locations in its project
area, assuming 80-acre spacing for
resource recovery). In addition to the
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
50400
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
well pads, roads, gas flow lines and
gathering lines, other required
infrastructure would include electrical
lines, water (and possible condensate)
lines, water treatment, storage and
disposal facilities, and gas treatment
and compression facilities. Gas and any
condensate would be transported via
pipeline to existing and new centralized
compression, treatment and sales
facilities. Produced water and any gas
condensates would be transported by
truck or pipeline to approved sales,
treatment or disposal facilities.
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the proposed
development action is to extract and
recover natural gas from the West
Tavaputs plateau area in an efficient
and orderly manner. The EIS will
analyze full field development, BBC’s
proposed action, and reasonable
alternatives at the appropriate scope
(including the no action alternative as
well as alternatives involving
application of mitigation and/or other
management protections for other
resource values and programs). This is
in accordance with BLM’s multiple-use
mandate and the goals and objectives of
the President’s National Energy Plan.
One of the identified needs for the EIS
at this time is based on the continuing
increase in the United States’ demand
for natural gas. BBC’s development
proposal indicates that up to 250
million cubic feet of natural gas per day
could be produced to help meet the
nation’s growing need for natural gas.
Identified benefits that may be derived
from the natural gas development also
include increased royalty and tax
revenue to local, State and Federal
governments, as appropriate, and
additional opportunities for
employment and economic benefits at
the local and regional level.
Alternatives
The EIS will analyze the proposed
action, reasonable alternatives
formulated through the scoping process,
and the No Action Alternative (in which
only the 38 wells presently approved
under the West Tavaputs Drilling
Program EA would be drilled). Some
alternatives will consider and analyze
mitigation and other measures to protect
other resources and uses that could be
imposed as Conditions of Approval
under which the development may take
place. At least one of the alternatives
will consider the use of Best
Management Practices such as: (1)
Burying of flow lines for transport of
water, condensate and gas to centralized
facilities; (2) requiring extensive interim
reclamation of production areas; (3)
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
locating facilities and wells in visually
acceptable areas and painting with
colors that blend in with the natural
environment; (4) minimizing the
amount of surface disturbance with the
use of alternative techniques, such as
drilling of multiple wells from the same
surface location; (5) using existing well
locations and other techniques designed
to reduce the footprint of new and
existing oil and gas production facilities
and infrastructure; and, (6) designing/
constructing all new roads to a safe and
appropriate standard to accommodate
their intended use.
the analysis of full field development,
BBC’s proposed development or its
potential impacts. The EIS will consider
comments and other issues/concerns
raised during the scoping period in
addition to those issues identified in
this notice. The BLM may use the
information collected during the
scoping period to: (1) Develop/analyze
appropriate mitigation as Conditions of
Approval under which the proposed
development may take place; (2)
consider potential reasonable
alternatives to the proposed action: or,
(3) both.
Anticipated Issues and Management
Concerns
Preliminary issues identified at this
time include (1) archaeological, historic
and cultural features including late19th-century structures and prehistoric
rock art; (2) wildlife, including big game
species (Mule Deer, Elk, etc.); (3)
Threatened and Endangered species
(Bald Eagle, Mexican Spotted Owl, and
several endangered fish including
Colorado Pikeminnow, Humpback
Chub, Bonytail, and Razorback Sucker);
(4) Utah BLM sensitive species such as
the Greater Sage Grouse; (5) surface and
subsurface watersheds/hydrology; (6)
transportation and roads, such as the
Nine Mile Canyon National Backcountry
Byway; (7) vegetation (including the
potential introduction of noxious
weeds, short-term re-vegetation and
restoration of disturbed areas, and longterm establishment and stabilization of
perennial vegetation through
recommended reclamation measures);
(8) drilling from within the canyon rims
and in the narrow canyon bottoms in
the region; (9) the proposed Nine-Mile
Canyon Area of Critical Environmental
Concern (ACEC); (10) the Jack Canyon
Wilderness Study Area and the
Desolation Canyon Wilderness Study
Area; (11) the Green River and its
potential for designation under the Wild
and Scenic River Act; (12) the
Desolation Canyon National Historic
Landmark; (13) air quality and visual
clarity; (14) recreational opportunities;
and (15) existing scenic quality of the
landscape. Other considerations include
FLPMA and NEPA in relationship to the
existing Price Management Framework
Plan, as amended, and the proposed
Price Resource Management Plan/EIS
revision. These preliminary issues are
not final. Identification of additional
issues and/or issue refinement through
the public participation process is
anticipated.
Comments should address: (1) Issues
to be considered for analysis; (2)
reasonable alternatives; and, (3) relevant
information for consideration relating to
Existing Development and Prior NEPA
Documents in the Plan Area
Currently, there are 71 natural gas
wells, with their attendant service roads
and facilities, already existing within
the project area. Of these 37 wells are
capable of production and 34 are
temporarily abandoned or plugged and
abandoned. The drilling of 38 new
exploration wells within the project area
and the corresponding production
infrastructure was previously analyzed
in the West Tavaputs Drilling Program
(EA) (UT–070–2004–28) and approved
by a Decision Record and Finding of No
Significant Impact on July 29, 2004.
Construction and drilling associated
with that exploration project approval is
in progress. The Stone Cabin 3D Seismic
Survey project (EA) (UT–070–2003–15),
now completed, also provided
environmental analysis of the impacts of
seismic exploration activities involving
some of the same lands that are now
proposed for development within the
project area.
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Consistency With Land Use Plans,
NEPA, and Potential Plan Amendments
The Price Resource Management Plan
(RMP) revision/EIS is currently under
development. The RMP analyzes (at the
landscape level) a range of levels of use
for natural gas development inclusive of
the level of development as proposed by
BBC, and will provide the prerequisite
landscape level analysis and various
resource protections. The BLM will
ensure that its actions are consistent
with the applicable land use plan. In the
event approval of the Price RMP is
unduly delayed, this EIS may
alternatively serve as an amendment to
the existing Management Framework
Plan. Should such an amendment be
necessary it will be based on the
following preliminary Planning Criteria
that have been identified to guide
resolution of any planning issues that
may arise as a result of this full field
development EIS analysis: (1) The plan
amendment will recognize the existence
of valid existing rights; (2) lands
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices
covered in the RMP amendment will be
public lands, which include split estate
lands, managed by BLM. Decisions in
the RMP amendment will be made only
on lands managed by BLM; (3) the BLM
will use a collaborative and multijurisdictional approach, where possible,
to jointly determine the desired future
condition of public lands; (4) the BLM
will make all possible attempts to
ensure that its management
prescriptions and amended planning
actions are as complimentary as
possible to other planning jurisdictions,
within the boundaries described by law
and policy; (5) the BLM will consider
the management prescriptions on
adjoining lands to minimize
inconsistent management. To the extent
possible, BLM will coordinate
inventories, planning, and management
programs with other Federal, state,
tribal, and local governments and
agencies; (6) management prescriptions
will focus on the relative values of
resources and not necessarily the
combination of uses that will give the
greatest economic return or economic
output; (7) to the extent possible, the
BLM will use current scientific
information, research, new technologies
and the results of resource assessments,
monitoring and coordination to
determine appropriate local and
regional management strategies that will
enhance or recover impaired
ecosystems; and (8) the plan
amendment will be completed in
compliance with FLPMA, NEPA, and all
other relevant Federal laws, executive
orders and management policies of the
BLM.
Site-Specific NEPA
While this EIS is intended to analyze
site-specific impacts, site-specific NEPA
analysis and documentation must
remain adequate and detailed enough to
identify and support any Conditions of
Approval or other adaptive management
actions justified by future site-specific
considerations. This is necessary so as
to retain BLM’s full authority at each
decision stage to manage its lands in
accordance with land use plans, prevent
unacceptable impacts, and to support
appropriate levels of protection and/or
mitigation against effects on other
resource values. Accordingly, additional
site-specific NEPA analysis may be
required before individual activities are
approved based on a review of the
specific conditions and the adequacy of
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:18 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
the existing NEPA documentation at the
time activities are proposed.
Patrick Gubbins,
Price Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 05–16953 Filed 8–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DK–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[OR–027–1610–DR; HAG 05–0050]
Notice of Availability of Records of
Decision for the Andrews Management
Unit and Steens Mountain Cooperative
Management and Protection Area
Resource Management Plans (RMPs)/
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and the Steens Mountain Wilderness
and Wild and Scenic Rivers Plan
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act (FLPMA), the Steens
Mountain Cooperative Management and
Protection Act of 2000 (Steens Act), and
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
policies, the BLM announces the
availability of the RMPs/RODs for the
Andrews Management Unit (AMU) and
Steens Mountain Cooperative
Management and Protection Area
(CMPA), located primarily in Harney
County in southeastern Oregon. The
Oregon/Washington State Director
approved the RMPs/RODs, which
become effective immediately. In
accordance with the Steens Act, BLM is
also releasing the Final Steens Mountain
Wilderness and WSRs Plan for pertinent
lands within the CMPA.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the AMU and
CMPA RMPs/RODs are available upon
request from the BLM Burns District
Office, 28910 Highway 20 West, Hines,
OR 97738, via e-mail at
OR_Burns_RMP@or.blm.gov, or via the
Internet at https://www.or.blm.gov/
Burns/Planning/AndrewsSteensRMP/
RMP.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Information about the plans may be
obtained by contacting the RMP Project
Leader, Gary Foulkes, BLM, Burns
District Office, 29810 Highway 20 West,
Hines, OR 97738, telephone (541–573–
4400), fax (541–573–4411), or e-mail
(gfoulkes@or.blm.gov).
three-year collaborative planning
process. These RMPs/RODs address
management on approximately
1,649,470 acres of public land
consisting of the 1,221,314-acre AMU
(public land in the Andrews Resource
Area outside the CMPA) and public
land in the 428,156-acre CMPA. In
addition, 53,436 acres of the Three
Rivers Resource Area falling within the
CMPA were also included in this
planning effort, and the Three Rivers
RMP is amended as a result. The AMU
and CMPA RMPs/RODs are designed to
achieve or maintain desired future
conditions determined through the
planning process. The RMPs include a
series of management actions to meet
the desired resource conditions for
upland and riparian vegetation, wildlife
habitats, cultural and visual resources,
livestock grazing and recreation,
wilderness, and WSRs, as well as other
resources. The Steens Mountain
Wilderness and WSRs Plan addresses
management issues associated with the
170,084-acre wilderness area and the
105 miles of WSRs in the CMPA.
Management activities in the
approved AMU and CMPA RMPs/RODs
are essentially the same as those
described in Alternative D for each area
in the AMU/CMPA Proposed RMP/Final
EIS, which was published in August
2004. BLM received five protests on the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS and three
comment letters on the Steens Mountain
Wilderness and WSRs Plan. The
protests were resolved without changes
to the RMPs. No inconsistencies with
State or local plans, policies, or
programs were identified during the
Governor’s consistency review of the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS. As a result,
except for separating the text for the two
plans, only minor editorial
modifications were made in the RMPs/
RODs. These modifications corrected
errors that were noted during review of
the Proposed RMP/Final EIS and
provide further clarification for some of
the decisions. The Comments received
on the Steens Mountain Wilderness and
WSRs Plan were considered during
development of the Final Steens
Mountain Wilderness and WSRs Plan.
James G. Kenna,
Associate State Director, Oregon/Washington.
[FR Doc. 05–16949 Filed 8–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–33–M
The AMU
and CMPA RMPs/RODs were developed
with broad public participation over a
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50401
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50399-50401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16953]
[[Page 50399]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[UT-070-1310-00]
Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) and to Conduct Public Scoping for the West Tavaputs Natural Gas
Full Field Development Plan, Carbon and Duchesne Counties, UT
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent (NOI) to conduct public scoping and prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the West Tavaputs Natural Gas
Full Field Development Plan, Carbon and Duchesne Counties, UT.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Price
Field Office, Price, Utah, will prepare an EIS on the impacts of
efficient and orderly development of the natural gas resources in the
West Tavaputs Plateau area on approximately 137,700 acres of public,
state, and private lands in Carbon and Duchesne Counties in eastern
Utah, as well as considering a site-specific development proposal on a
portion of the West Tavaputs Plateau area. The Price Field Office
Manager will be the authorized officer for this project.
DATES: A public scoping period of at least 30 days will commence on the
date this notice is published in the Federal Register. If you have any
information, data or concerns related to the potential impacts of the
proposed action, or have suggestions for additional alternatives, or
have comments on the proposed planning amendment criteria, please
submit them to the address listed below within 30 days of the date this
Notice is published, or within 15 days after the last public meeting is
held. Public open houses and informational meetings will be conducted
during the scoping period in Price, Roosevelt, and Salt Lake City,
Utah. Details on these meetings will be publicized in the respective
city's newspapers at least 15 days prior to their scheduled dates.
ADDRESSES: Written scoping comments should be sent to: Field Manager,
Bureau of Land Management, Price Field Office, 125 South 600 West,
Price, Utah 84501, ATTN: West Tavaputs Natural Gas Full Field
Development Plan. Comments, including names and street addresses of
respondents will be available for public review at the BLM Price Field
Office and will be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). They may be published as part of the EIS and
other related documents. Individual respondents may request
confidentiality. If you wish to withhold your name or street address
from public review and disclosure under the FOIA, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your written comment. Such requests
will be honored to the extent allowed by law. All submissions from
organizations or businesses will be made available for public
inspection in their entirety.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred O'Ferrall, (435) 636-3607.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Bill Barrett Corporation (BBC), together
with some other lessees, has submitted a proposal to develop the
natural gas resources on leased lands under their control in the West
Tavaputs Plateau area. The BLM has determined that a comprehensive plan
for full field development of the natural gas resources in the larger
field area would allow more flexibility. A more comprehensive area
analysis will reduce the need for redundant future analyses, since the
analysis of the comprehensive plan would also evaluate the impacts of
other development proposals on existing lessees in the area and the
impacts of development on lands not currently under lease. The EIS will
consider and analyze potential impacts of natural gas development at
the levels projected by BBC or as refined during the scoping process on
both leased and unleased lands in the entire West Tavaputs Plateau
area. This analysis will include a site-specific evaluation of BBC's
proposal under an appropriate range of alternatives, and will also
consider mitigation measures as Conditions of Approval under which the
development may take place.
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action is to consider and determine the conditions
under which full field development of natural gas resources within the
West Tavaputs area (an area larger than, but encompassing, BBC's
``project area'') would be approved. The BLM anticipates analyzing the
proposed action and also intends to rely on this EIS to evaluate and,
if appropriate, approve site-specific individual drilling applications
and right-of-way authorizations, where applicants (such as, BBC) can
provide sufficiently detailed information for inclusion into this
process. The development plan proposal includes multiple wells, roads,
access routes, production facilities, and utilities. The total number
of wells ultimately drilled for field development depends on many
factors, such as reservoir properties, production success, per well
recovery, emergent engineering technologies, economic factors,
availability of commodity markets, and lease stipulations and
restrictions.
Site-Specific Project Proposal by BBC and Others
The project area identified by BBC encompassing approximately
137,700 acres, is located approximately 25 miles east of Price, Utah
and 60 miles southwest of Vernal, Utah and is within Carbon and
Duchesne Counties in Eastern Utah. The full field development area/EIS
involves approximately 87% BLM-administered lands (119,661 acres); 8%
State of Utah-administered lands (10,434 acres); and 5% private mineral
land (7,605 acres). Approximately 98 percent of the BBC proposed
project is located on the top of the West Tavaputs plateau. The
remaining area, approximately two percent, is proposed to be located in
the narrow canyon bottoms of the Nine Mile Canyon region and in
portions of Jack Canyon and Desolation Canyon Wilderness Study Areas,
on existing Federal leases with valid existing rights.
The long-term BBC proposal for full development (along with other
operators) of their mineral leases includes drilling up to 750 new
wells (Federal, state and private minerals) on a maximum of 500 surface
locations over a period of 20 years or until such date as the resource
base is fully developed. The number of wells drilled each year would
average about 30, although peak activity in any one year might reach 70
or more wells. The BBC development proposal contemplates some year-
round drilling which would require applications for one-time exceptions
and/or waiver of existing lease stipulations imposed to protect
seasonal range habitat for elk, mule deer and bighorn sheep.
Preliminary estimates anticipate that the amount of surface
disturbance will range from two to four thousand acres out of the
137,700 acre full field development area and that the projected field
life will be 40 or more years. Directional and other drilling
techniques are included in BBC's proposal and will also be used, as
appropriate, throughout the area to keep the number of surface
locations to the minimum necessary to effectively and efficiently
recover the hydrocarbon resources (BBC is proposing 750 wells from 500
surface locations in its project area, assuming 80-acre spacing for
resource recovery). In addition to the
[[Page 50400]]
well pads, roads, gas flow lines and gathering lines, other required
infrastructure would include electrical lines, water (and possible
condensate) lines, water treatment, storage and disposal facilities,
and gas treatment and compression facilities. Gas and any condensate
would be transported via pipeline to existing and new centralized
compression, treatment and sales facilities. Produced water and any gas
condensates would be transported by truck or pipeline to approved
sales, treatment or disposal facilities.
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the proposed development action is to extract and
recover natural gas from the West Tavaputs plateau area in an efficient
and orderly manner. The EIS will analyze full field development, BBC's
proposed action, and reasonable alternatives at the appropriate scope
(including the no action alternative as well as alternatives involving
application of mitigation and/or other management protections for other
resource values and programs). This is in accordance with BLM's
multiple-use mandate and the goals and objectives of the President's
National Energy Plan. One of the identified needs for the EIS at this
time is based on the continuing increase in the United States' demand
for natural gas. BBC's development proposal indicates that up to 250
million cubic feet of natural gas per day could be produced to help
meet the nation's growing need for natural gas. Identified benefits
that may be derived from the natural gas development also include
increased royalty and tax revenue to local, State and Federal
governments, as appropriate, and additional opportunities for
employment and economic benefits at the local and regional level.
Alternatives
The EIS will analyze the proposed action, reasonable alternatives
formulated through the scoping process, and the No Action Alternative
(in which only the 38 wells presently approved under the West Tavaputs
Drilling Program EA would be drilled). Some alternatives will consider
and analyze mitigation and other measures to protect other resources
and uses that could be imposed as Conditions of Approval under which
the development may take place. At least one of the alternatives will
consider the use of Best Management Practices such as: (1) Burying of
flow lines for transport of water, condensate and gas to centralized
facilities; (2) requiring extensive interim reclamation of production
areas; (3) locating facilities and wells in visually acceptable areas
and painting with colors that blend in with the natural environment;
(4) minimizing the amount of surface disturbance with the use of
alternative techniques, such as drilling of multiple wells from the
same surface location; (5) using existing well locations and other
techniques designed to reduce the footprint of new and existing oil and
gas production facilities and infrastructure; and, (6) designing/
constructing all new roads to a safe and appropriate standard to
accommodate their intended use.
Anticipated Issues and Management Concerns
Preliminary issues identified at this time include (1)
archaeological, historic and cultural features including late-19th-
century structures and prehistoric rock art; (2) wildlife, including
big game species (Mule Deer, Elk, etc.); (3) Threatened and Endangered
species (Bald Eagle, Mexican Spotted Owl, and several endangered fish
including Colorado Pikeminnow, Humpback Chub, Bonytail, and Razorback
Sucker); (4) Utah BLM sensitive species such as the Greater Sage
Grouse; (5) surface and subsurface watersheds/hydrology; (6)
transportation and roads, such as the Nine Mile Canyon National
Backcountry Byway; (7) vegetation (including the potential introduction
of noxious weeds, short-term re-vegetation and restoration of disturbed
areas, and long-term establishment and stabilization of perennial
vegetation through recommended reclamation measures); (8) drilling from
within the canyon rims and in the narrow canyon bottoms in the region;
(9) the proposed Nine-Mile Canyon Area of Critical Environmental
Concern (ACEC); (10) the Jack Canyon Wilderness Study Area and the
Desolation Canyon Wilderness Study Area; (11) the Green River and its
potential for designation under the Wild and Scenic River Act; (12) the
Desolation Canyon National Historic Landmark; (13) air quality and
visual clarity; (14) recreational opportunities; and (15) existing
scenic quality of the landscape. Other considerations include FLPMA and
NEPA in relationship to the existing Price Management Framework Plan,
as amended, and the proposed Price Resource Management Plan/EIS
revision. These preliminary issues are not final. Identification of
additional issues and/or issue refinement through the public
participation process is anticipated.
Comments should address: (1) Issues to be considered for analysis;
(2) reasonable alternatives; and, (3) relevant information for
consideration relating to the analysis of full field development, BBC's
proposed development or its potential impacts. The EIS will consider
comments and other issues/concerns raised during the scoping period in
addition to those issues identified in this notice. The BLM may use the
information collected during the scoping period to: (1) Develop/analyze
appropriate mitigation as Conditions of Approval under which the
proposed development may take place; (2) consider potential reasonable
alternatives to the proposed action: or, (3) both.
Existing Development and Prior NEPA Documents in the Plan Area
Currently, there are 71 natural gas wells, with their attendant
service roads and facilities, already existing within the project area.
Of these 37 wells are capable of production and 34 are temporarily
abandoned or plugged and abandoned. The drilling of 38 new exploration
wells within the project area and the corresponding production
infrastructure was previously analyzed in the West Tavaputs Drilling
Program (EA) (UT-070-2004-28) and approved by a Decision Record and
Finding of No Significant Impact on July 29, 2004. Construction and
drilling associated with that exploration project approval is in
progress. The Stone Cabin 3D Seismic Survey project (EA) (UT-070-2003-
15), now completed, also provided environmental analysis of the impacts
of seismic exploration activities involving some of the same lands that
are now proposed for development within the project area.
Consistency With Land Use Plans, NEPA, and Potential Plan Amendments
The Price Resource Management Plan (RMP) revision/EIS is currently
under development. The RMP analyzes (at the landscape level) a range of
levels of use for natural gas development inclusive of the level of
development as proposed by BBC, and will provide the prerequisite
landscape level analysis and various resource protections. The BLM will
ensure that its actions are consistent with the applicable land use
plan. In the event approval of the Price RMP is unduly delayed, this
EIS may alternatively serve as an amendment to the existing Management
Framework Plan. Should such an amendment be necessary it will be based
on the following preliminary Planning Criteria that have been
identified to guide resolution of any planning issues that may arise as
a result of this full field development EIS analysis: (1) The plan
amendment will recognize the existence of valid existing rights; (2)
lands
[[Page 50401]]
covered in the RMP amendment will be public lands, which include split
estate lands, managed by BLM. Decisions in the RMP amendment will be
made only on lands managed by BLM; (3) the BLM will use a collaborative
and multi-jurisdictional approach, where possible, to jointly determine
the desired future condition of public lands; (4) the BLM will make all
possible attempts to ensure that its management prescriptions and
amended planning actions are as complimentary as possible to other
planning jurisdictions, within the boundaries described by law and
policy; (5) the BLM will consider the management prescriptions on
adjoining lands to minimize inconsistent management. To the extent
possible, BLM will coordinate inventories, planning, and management
programs with other Federal, state, tribal, and local governments and
agencies; (6) management prescriptions will focus on the relative
values of resources and not necessarily the combination of uses that
will give the greatest economic return or economic output; (7) to the
extent possible, the BLM will use current scientific information,
research, new technologies and the results of resource assessments,
monitoring and coordination to determine appropriate local and regional
management strategies that will enhance or recover impaired ecosystems;
and (8) the plan amendment will be completed in compliance with FLPMA,
NEPA, and all other relevant Federal laws, executive orders and
management policies of the BLM.
Site-Specific NEPA
While this EIS is intended to analyze site-specific impacts, site-
specific NEPA analysis and documentation must remain adequate and
detailed enough to identify and support any Conditions of Approval or
other adaptive management actions justified by future site-specific
considerations. This is necessary so as to retain BLM's full authority
at each decision stage to manage its lands in accordance with land use
plans, prevent unacceptable impacts, and to support appropriate levels
of protection and/or mitigation against effects on other resource
values. Accordingly, additional site-specific NEPA analysis may be
required before individual activities are approved based on a review of
the specific conditions and the adequacy of the existing NEPA
documentation at the time activities are proposed.
Patrick Gubbins,
Price Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 05-16953 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DK-P