Employer Comparable Contributions to Health Savings Accounts Under Section 4980G, 50233-50244 [05-16941]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
to A made in January is not wages for 2004
because the $150 cash-remuneration test is
not met. However, if X pays additional
remuneration to employees for agricultural
labor in 2004 that equals or exceeds $2,360,
the employer’s-expenditures-for-agriculturallabor test will be met and the $140 paid by
X to A in 2004 will be considered wages. It
is immaterial that the work was performed in
2003.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Effective dates. The provisions of
this section apply to any payment for
agricultural labor made on or after
January 1, 1988. For rules applicable to
any payment for agricultural labor made
prior to January 1, 1988, see
§ 31.3121(a)(8)–1 in effect at such time
(see 26 CFR part 31 revised as of April
1, 2005).
Par. 6. Section 31.3121(a)(10)–1 is
revised to read as follows:
§ 31.3121(a)(10)–1
home workers.
Payments to certain
(a) The term wages does not include
remuneration paid by an employer in
any calendar year to an employee for
service performed as a home worker
who is an employee by reason of the
provisions of section 3121(d)(3)(C) (see
§ 31.3121(d)–1(d)), unless the cash
remuneration paid in such calendar year
by the employer to the employee for
such services is $100 or more. The test
relating to cash remuneration of $100 or
more is based on remuneration paid in
a calendar year rather than on
remuneration earned during a calendar
year. If cash remuneration of $100 or
more is paid in a particular calendar
year, it is immaterial whether such
remuneration is in payment for services
performed during the year of payment
or during any other year.
(b) The application of paragraph (a) of
this section may be illustrated by the
following example:
Example. A, a home worker, performs
services for X, a manufacturer, in 2003 and
2004. In the performance of the home work
A is an employee by reason of section
3121(d)(3)(C). In March 2004, A returns to X
articles made by A at home from materials
received by A from X in 2003. X pays A cash
remuneration of $100 for such work when
the finished articles are delivered. The $100
includes $10 which represents remuneration
for home work performed by A in 2003. The
entire $100 is subject to the taxes. Any
additional cash remuneration paid by X to A
in 2004 for such services is also subject to the
taxes.
(c) In the event an employee receives
remuneration in any one calendar year
from more than one employer for
services performed as a home worker of
the character described in paragraph (a)
of this section, the regulations in this
section are to be applied with respect to
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
the remuneration received by the
employee from each employer in such
calendar year for such services. This
exclusion from wages has no
application to remuneration paid for
services performed as a home worker
who is an employee under section
3121(d)(2) (see § 31.3121(d)–1(c))
relating to common law employees.
(d) Cash remuneration includes
checks and other monetary media of
exchange. Remuneration paid in any
other medium, such as clothing, car
tokens, transportation passes or tickets,
or other goods or commodities, is
disregarded in determining whether the
$100 cash-remuneration test is met. If
the cash remuneration paid in any
calendar year by an employer to an
employee for services performed as a
home worker of the character described
in paragraph (a) of this section is $100
or more, then no remuneration, whether
in cash or in any medium other than
cash, paid by the employer to the
employee in such calendar year for such
services is excluded from wages under
this exception.
(e)(1) For provisions relating to
deductions of employee tax or amounts
equivalent to the tax from cash
payments for services performed as a
home worker within the meaning of
section 3121(d)(3)(C), see § 31.3102–1.
(2) For provisions relating to the time
of payment of wages for services
performed as a home worker within the
meaning of section 3121(d)(3)(C), see
§ 31.3121(a)–2.
(3) For provisions relating to records
to be kept with respect to payment of
wages for services performed as a home
worker within the meaning of section
3121(d)(3)(C), see § 31.6001–2.
(f) The provisions of this section
apply to any payment for services
performed as a home worker within the
meaning of section 3121(d)(3)(C) made
on or after January 1, 1978. For rules
applicable to any payment for services
performed as a home worker within the
meaning of section 3121(d)(3)(C) made
prior to January 1, 1978, see
§ 31.3121(a)(10)–1 in effect at such time
(see 26 CFR part 31 revised as of April
1, 2005).
Par. 7. Section 31.3121(i)–1 is
amended as follows:
1. Redesignating the undesignated
text as paragraph (a).
2. Remove the language ‘‘quarter’’
each place it appears and add ‘‘year’’ in
its place in newly designated paragraph
(a).
3. Adding new paragraph (b).
The addition reads as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50233
§ 31.3121(i)–1 Computation to nearest
dollar of cash remuneration for domestic
service.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The provisions of this section
apply to any cash payment for domestic
service in a private home of the
employer made on or after January 1,
1994. For rules applicable to any cash
payment for domestic service in a
private home of the employer made
prior to January 1, 1994, see
§ 31.3121(i)–1 in effect at such time (see
26 CFR part 31 revised as of April 1,
2005).
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 05–16944 Filed 8–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 54
[REG–138647–04]
RIN 1545–BE30
Employer Comparable Contributions to
Health Savings Accounts Under
Section 4980G
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains
proposed regulations providing
guidance on employer comparable
contributions to Health Savings
Accounts (HSAs) under section 4980G.
In general, these proposed regulations
would affect employers that contribute
to employees’ HSAs.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by November 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–138647–04), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, POB
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
DC 20044. Submissions may be hand
delivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–138647–04),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC. Alternatively,
taxpayers may submit comments
electronically via the IRS Internet site at
www.irs.gov/regs or via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (IRS–REG–
138647–04).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
50234
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Barbara E. Pie at (202) 622–6080;
concerning submissions of comments or
a request for a public hearing, Kelly
Banks at (202) 622–7180 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed
Pension Excise Tax Regulations (26 CFR
part 54) under section 4980G of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code). Under
section 4980G of the Code, an excise tax
is imposed on an employer that fails to
make comparable contributions to the
HSAs of its employees.
Section 1201 of the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003 (Act), Public
Law 108–173, (117 Stat. 2066, 2003)
added section 223 to the Code to permit
eligible individuals to establish HSAs
for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2003. Section 4980G was
also added to the Code by the Act.
Section 4980G(a) imposes an excise tax
on the failure of an employer to make
comparable contributions to the HSAs
of its employees for a calendar year.
Section 4980G(b) provides that rules
and requirements similar to section
4980E (the comparability rules for
Archer Medical Savings Accounts
(Archer MSAs)) apply for purposes of
section 4980G. Section 4980E(b)
imposes an excise tax equal to 35% of
the aggregate amount contributed by the
employer to the Archer MSAs of
employees during the calendar year if
an employer fails to make comparable
contributions to the Archer MSAs of its
employees in a calendar year. Therefore,
if an employer fails to make comparable
contributions to the HSAs of its
employees during a calendar year, an
excise tax equal to 35% of the aggregate
amount contributed by the employer to
the HSAs of its employees during that
calendar year is imposed on the
employer. See Sections 4980G(a) and (b)
and 4980E(b). See also Notice 2004–2
(2004–2 I.R.B. 269), Q & A–32.
Explanation of Provisions
Overview
The proposed regulations clarify and
expand on the guidance regarding the
comparability rules published in Notice
2004–2 and in Notice 2004–50 (2004–33
I.R.B. 196), Q & A–46 through Q & A–
54.
I. Comparable Contributions in General
An employer is not required to
contribute to the HSAs of its employees.
However, in general, if an employer
makes contributions to any employee’s
HSA, the employer must make
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
comparable contributions to the HSAs
of all comparable participating
employees. Comparable participating
employees are eligible individuals (as
defined in section 223(c)(1)) who have
the same category of high deductible
health plan (HDHP) coverage. The
categories of coverage are self-only
HDHP coverage and family HDHP
coverage.
These proposed regulations
incorporate the rule in Notice 2004–2, Q
& A–32 that contributions are
comparable if they are either the same
amount or the same percentage of the
deductible for employees who are
eligible individuals with the same
category of coverage. An employer is not
required to contribute the same amount
or the same percentage of the deductible
for employees who are eligible
individuals with self-only HDHP
coverage that it contributes for
employees who are eligible individuals
with family HDHP coverage. An
employer that satisfies the
comparability rules by contributing the
same amount to the HSAs of all
employees who are eligible individuals
with self-only HDHP coverage is not
required to contribute any amount to the
HSAs of employees who are eligible
individuals with family HDHP coverage,
or to contribute the same percentage of
the family HDHP deductible as the
amount contributed with respect to selfonly HDHP coverage. Similarly, an
employer that satisfies the
comparability rules by contributing the
same amount to the HSAs of all
employees who are eligible individuals
with family HDHP coverage is not
required to contribute any amount to the
HSAs of employees who are eligible
individuals with self-only HDHP
coverage, or to contribute the same
percentage of the self-only HDHP
deductible as the amount contributed
with respect to family HDHP coverage.
II. Calculating Comparable
Contributions
The proposed regulations clarify that
contributions to the HSAs of certain
individuals are not taken into account
in determining whether an employer’s
contributions to the HSAs of its
employees satisfy the comparability
rules. Specifically, contributions to the
HSAs of independent contractors, sole
proprietors, and partners in a
partnership are not taken into account
under the comparability rules. In
addition, the comparability rules do not
apply to amounts rolled over from an
employee’s HSA or Archer MSA or to
after-tax employee contributions.
The proposed regulations also clarify
that the categories of employees for
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comparability testing are current fulltime employees, current part-time
employees, and former employees
(except for former employees with
coverage under the employer’s HDHP
because of an election under a COBRA
continuation provision (as defined in
section 9832(d)(1)). The proposed
regulations provide that the
comparability rules apply separately to
each of the categories of employees. If
an employer contributes to the HSA of
any employee in a category of
employees, the employer must make
comparable contributions to the HSAs
of all comparable participating
employees within that category.
Therefore, the comparability rules apply
to a category of employees only if an
employer contributes to the HSA of any
employee within the category. For
example, an employer that makes
comparable contributions to the HSAs
of all full-time employees who are
eligible individuals but does not
contribute to the HSA of any employee
who is not a full-time employee,
satisfies the comparability rules.
The categories of employees set forth
in these proposed regulations are the
exclusive categories for comparability
testing. An employer must make
comparable contributions to the HSAs
of all comparable participating
employees (eligible individuals who are
in the same category of employees with
the same category of HDHP coverage)
during the calendar year without regard
to any classification other than these
categories. Therefore, the comparability
rules do not apply separately to groups
of collectively bargained employees.
While the comparability rules apply
separately to part-time employees, there
is no similar rule permitting separate
application of the comparability rules to
collectively bargained employees.
Neither section 4980E nor section
4980G provides an exception to the
comparability rules for collectively
bargained employees. Accordingly, an
employer must make comparable
contributions to the HSAs of all
comparable participating employees,
both those who are covered under a
collective bargaining agreement and
those who are not covered. Similarly,
the comparability rules do not apply
separately to management and nonmanagement employees.
The proposed regulations also provide
that the comparability rules apply
separately to employees who have HSAs
and employees who have Archer MSAs.
However, if an employee has both an
HSA and an Archer MSA, the employer
may contribute to either the HSA or the
Archer MSA, but not to both.
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
The proposed regulations incorporate
the rule set forth in Q & A–53 of Notice
2004–50, which provides that if an
employer limits HSA contributions to
employees who are eligible individuals
with coverage under an HDHP provided
by the employer, the employer is not
required to make comparable
contributions to the HSAs of employees
who are eligible individuals with
coverage under an HDHP not provided
by the employer. However, if an
employer contributes to the HSAs of
employees who are eligible individuals
with coverage under any HDHP, in
addition to the HDHPs provided by the
employer, the employer is required to
make comparable contributions to the
HSAs of all comparable participating
employees whether or not covered
under employer’s HDHP. The proposed
regulations also provide that similar
rules apply to employer contributions to
the HSAs of former employees. For
example, if an employer limits HSA
contributions to former employees who
are eligible individuals with coverage
under an HDHP provided by the
employer, the employer is not required
make comparable contributions to the
HSAs of former employees who are
eligible individuals with coverage under
an HDHP not provided by the employer.
However, if an employer contributes to
the HSAs of former employees who are
eligible individuals with coverage under
the employer’s HDHP, the employer is
not required to make comparable
contributions to the HSAs of former
employees who are eligible individuals
with coverage under the employer’s
HDHP because of an election under a
COBRA continuation provision (as
defined in section 9832(d)(1)).
The proposed regulations also
incorporate the rule set forth in Q & A–
46 of Notice 2004–50, which provides
that the comparability rules will not be
satisfied if an employer makes HSA
contributions in an amount equal to an
employee’s HSA contribution or a
percentage of the employee’s HSA
contribution (matching contributions)
because if all comparable participating
employees do not contribute the same
amount to their HSAs, they will not
receive comparable contributions to
their HSAs. In addition, the
comparability rules will not be satisfied
if an employer conditions contributions
to an employee’s HSA on an employee’s
participation in health assessments,
disease management programs or
wellness programs because if all
comparable participating employees do
not elect to participate in all the
programs, they will not receive
comparable contributions to their HSAs.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
See Q & A–48 of Notice 2004–50.
Similarly, the comparability rules will
not be satisfied if an employer makes
additional contributions to the HSAs of
all comparable participating employees
who have attained a specified age or
who have worked for the employer for
a specified number of years, because if
all comparable participating employees
do not meet the age or length of service
requirement, they will not receive
comparable contributions to their HSAs.
See Q & A–50 of Notice 2004–50.
III. Procedures for Making Comparable
Contributions
The proposed regulations provide that
in determining whether the
comparability rules are satisfied, an
employer must take into account all
full-time and part-time employees who
were eligible individuals for any month
during the calendar year. An employee
is an eligible individual if as of the first
day of the month the employee meets all
of the requirements set forth in section
223(c). An employer may comply with
the comparability rules by contributing
amounts at one or more times for the
calendar year to the HSAs of employees
who are eligible individuals, if
contributions are the same amount or
the same percentage of the HDHP
deductible for employees who are
eligible individuals with the same
category of coverage and are made at the
same time (contributions on a pay-asyou-go basis).
An employer may also satisfy the
comparability rules by determining
comparable contributions for the
calendar year at the end of the calendar
year, taking into account all employees
who were eligible individuals for any
month during the calendar year and
contributing the correct amount (a
percentage of the HDHP deductible or a
specified dollar amount for the same
categories of coverage) to the employees’
HSAs by April 15th of the following
year (contributions on a look-back
basis).
If an employer makes comparable
HSA contributions on a pay-as-you-go
basis, it must do so for each comparable
participating employee who is an
employee during the time period used
to make contributions. For example, if
an employer makes HSA contributions
each pay period, it must do so for each
comparable participating employee who
is an employee during the pay period.
If an employer makes comparable
contributions on a look-back-basis, it
must do so for each employee who was
a comparable participating employee for
any month during the calendar year.
In addition, an employer may make
all of its contributions to the HSAs of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50235
employees who are eligible individuals
at the beginning of the calendar year
(contributions on a pre-funded basis).
An employer that makes comparable
HSA contributions on a pre-funded
basis will not fail to satisfy the
comparability rules because an
employee who terminates employment
prior to the end of the calendar year has
received more HSA contributions on a
monthly basis than employees who
worked the entire calendar year. If an
employer makes HSA contributions on
a pre-funded basis, it must do so for all
employees who are comparable
participating employees at the
beginning of the calendar year. An
employer that makes HSA contributions
on a pre-funded basis must make
comparable HSA contributions for all
employees who are comparable
participating employees for any month
during the calendar year, including
employees hired after the date of initial
funding.
If an employee has not established an
HSA at the time the employer funds its
employee’s HSAs, the employer
complies with the comparability rules
by contributing comparable amounts to
the employee’s HSA when the employee
establishes the HSA, taking into account
each month that the employee was a
comparable participating employee.
However, an employer is not required to
make comparable contributions for a
calendar year to an employee’s HSA if
the employee has not established an
HSA by December 31st of the calendar
year.
The proposed regulations provide that
if an employer determines that the
comparability rules are not satisfied for
a calendar year, the employer may not
recoup from an employee’s HSA any
portion of the employer’s contribution
to the employee’s HSA because under
section 223(d)(1)(E), an account
beneficiary’s interest in an HSA is
nonforfeitable. However, an employer
may make additional HSA contributions
to satisfy the comparability rules. An
employer may contribute up until April
15th following the calendar year in
which the non-comparable
contributions were made. An employer
that makes additional HSA
contributions to correct non-comparable
contributions must also contribute
reasonable interest.
IV. Exception to the Comparability
Rules for Cafeteria Plans
The legislative history of the Act
states that the comparability rules do
not apply to HSA contributions that an
employer makes through a cafeteria
plan. See Conf. Rep. No. 391, 108th
Cong., 1st Sess. 843 (2003), 2004
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
50236
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
U.S.C.C.A.N. 1808. See also Notice
2004–2, Q & A–32. The
nondiscrimination rules in section 125
of the Code apply to HSA contributions
(including matching contributions)
made through a cafeteria plan.
Generally, a cafeteria plan is a written
plan under which all participants are
employees and participants may choose
among two or more benefits consisting
of cash and qualified benefits. Unlike
the cafeteria plan nondiscrimination
rules, the comparability rules are not
based upon discrimination in favor of
highly compensated or key employees.
Therefore, an employer that maintains
an HDHP only for highly compensated
or key employees and makes HSA
contributions through a cafeteria plan
only for those eligible employees, does
not violate the comparability rules, but
may violate the cafeteria plan
nondiscrimination rules.
V. Waiver of Excise Tax
In the case of a failure which is due
to reasonable cause and not to willful
neglect, all or a portion of the excise tax
imposed under section 4980G may be
waived to the extent that the payment
of the tax would be excessive relative to
the failure involved. See sections
4980G(b) and 4980E(c).
Proposed Effective Date
It is proposed that these regulations
apply to employer contributions made
on or after the date the final regulations
are published in the Federal Register.
However, taxpayers may rely on these
regulations for guidance pending the
issuance of final regulations.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
also has been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations. This notice of
proposed rulemaking does not impose a
collection of information on small
entities, thus the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code,
these proposed regulations will be
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for Public
Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
written comments (a signed original and
eight (8) copies) or electronic comments
that are submitted timely to the IRS. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
specifically request comments on the
clarity of the proposed rules and how
they can be made easier to understand.
In addition, comments are requested on
the application of the comparability
rules to employees who are on leave
pursuant to the Family and Medical
Leave Act of 1993, Public Law 103–3,
(107 Stat. 6, 1993, 29 U.S.C. 2601 et
seq.). Comments are also requested
concerning employer matching HSA
contributions made through a cafeteria
plan. Specifically, whether the ratio of
an employer’s matching HSA
contributions to an employee’s salary
reduction HSA contributions should be
limited, and whether employer
matching contributions exceeding a
specific limit should be subject to the
section 4980G comparability rules. All
comments will be available for public
inspection and copying. A public
hearing will be scheduled if requested
in writing by any person that timely
submits written comments.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
proposed regulations is Barbara E. Pie,
Office of Division Counsel/Associate
Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and
Government Entities), Internal Revenue
Service. However, personnel from other
offices of the IRS and Treasury
Department participated in their
development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 54
Excise taxes, Pensions, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendment to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 54 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 54—PENSION EXCISE TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 54 is amended by adding an
entry in numerical order to read, in part,
as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 54.4980G–1 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 4980G. * * *
Par. 2. Sections 54.4980G–0 through
54.4980G–5 are added to read as
follows:
§ 54.4980G–0
Table of contents.
This section contains the questions
for § 54.4980G–1 through § 54.4980G–5.
§ 54.4980G–1 Failure of employer to make
comparable health savings account
contributions.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Q–1. What are the comparability rules that
apply to employer contributions to Health
Savings Accounts (HSAs)?
Q–2. What are the categories of HDHP
coverage for purposes of applying the
comparability rules?
Q–3. What is the testing period for making
comparable contributions to employees’
HSAs?
Q–4. How is the excise tax computed if
employer contributions do not satisfy the
comparability rules for a calendar year?
§ 54.4980G–2 Employer contribution
defined.
Q–1. Do the comparability rules apply to
amounts rolled over from an employee’s HSA
or Archer Medical Savings Account (Archer
MSA)?
Q–2. If an employee requests that his or her
employer deduct after-tax amounts from the
employee’s compensation and forward these
amounts as employee contributions to the
employee’s HSA, do the comparability rules
apply to these amounts?
§ 54.4980G–3 Definition of employee for
comparability testing.
Q–1. Do the comparability rules apply to
contributions that an employer makes to the
HSAs of independent contractors?
Q–2. May a sole proprietor who is an
eligible individual contribute to his or her
own HSA without contributing to the HSAs
of his or her employees who are eligible
individuals?
Q–3. Do the comparability rules apply to
contributions by a partnership to a partner’s
HSA?
Q–4. How are members of controlled
groups treated when applying the
comparability rules?
Q–5. What are the categories of employees
for comparability testing?
Q–6. Is an employer permitted to make
comparable contributions only to the HSAs
of comparable participating employees who
have coverage under the employer’s HDHP?
Q–7. If an employee and his or her spouse
are eligible individuals who work for the
same employer and one employee-spouse has
family coverage for both employees under the
employer’s HDHP, must the employer make
comparable contributions to the HSAs of
both employees?
Q–8. Does an employer that makes HSA
contributions only for non-management
employees who are eligible individuals, but
not for management employees who are
eligible individuals or that makes HSA
contributions only for management
employees who are eligible individuals but
not for non-management employees who are
eligible individuals satisfy the requirement
that the employer make comparable
contributions?
Q–9. If an employer contributes to the
HSAs of former employees who are eligible
individuals, do the comparability rules apply
to these contributions?
Q–10. Is an employer permitted to make
comparable contributions only to the HSAs
of comparable participating former
employees who have coverage under the
employer’s HDHP?
Q–11. If an employer contributes only to
the HSAs of former employees who are
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
eligible individuals with coverage under the
employer’s HDHP, must the employer make
comparable contributions to the HSAs of
former employees who are eligible
individuals with coverage under the
employer’s HDHP because of an election
under a COBRA continuation provision (as
defined in section 9832(d)(1))?
Q–12. How do the comparability rules
apply if some employees have HSAs and
other employees have Archer MSAs?
§ 54.4980G–4 Calculating comparable
contributions.
Q–1. What are comparable contributions?
Q–2. How do the comparability rules apply
to employer contributions to employees’
HSAs if some employees work full-time
during the entire calendar year, and other
employees work full-time for less than the
entire calendar year?
Q–3. How does an employer comply with
the comparability rules when some
employees who are eligible individuals do
not work for the employer during the entire
calendar year?
Q–4. May an employer make all of its
contributions to the HSAs of its employees
who are eligible individuals at the beginning
of the calendar year (i.e., on a pre-funded
basis) instead of contributing on a pay-asyou-go or on a look-back basis?
Q–5. Must an employer use the same
contribution method as described in Q & A–
3 and Q & A–4 of this section for all
employees who were comparable
participating employees for any month
during the calendar year?
Q–6. How does an employer comply with
the comparability rules if an employee has
not established an HSA at the time the
employer contributes to its employees’
HSAs?
Q–7. If an employer bases its contributions
on a percentage of the HDHP deductible, how
is the correct percentage or dollar amount
computed?
Q–8. Does an employer that contributes to
the HSA of each comparable participating
employee in an amount equal to the
employee’s HSA contribution or a percentage
of the employee’s HSA contribution
(matching contributions) satisfy the rule that
all comparable participating employees
receive comparable contributions?
Q–9. If an employer conditions
contributions by the employer to an
employee’s HSA on an employee’s
participation in health assessments, disease
management programs or wellness programs
and makes the same contributions available
to all employees who participate in the
programs, do the contributions satisfy the
comparability rules?
Q–10. If an employer makes additional
contributions to the HSAs of all comparable
participating employees who have attained a
specified age or who have worked for the
employer for a specified number of years, do
the contributions satisfy the comparability
rules?
Q–11. If an employer makes additional
contributions to the HSAs of all comparable
participating employees who qualify for the
additional contributions (HSA catch-up
contributions) under section 223(b)(3), do the
contributions satisfy the comparability rules?
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Q–12. If an employer’s contributions to an
employee’s HSA result in non-comparable
contributions, may the employer recoup the
excess amount from the employee’s HSA?
§ 54.4980G–5 HSA comparability rules and
cafeteria plans and waiver of excise tax.
Q–1. If an employer makes contributions
through a section 125 cafeteria plan to the
HSA of each employee who is an eligible
individual are the contributions subject to
the comparability rules?
Q–2. If an employer makes contributions
through a cafeteria plan to the HSA of each
employee who is an eligible individual in an
amount equal to the amount of the
employee’s HSA contribution or a percentage
of the amount of the employee’s HSA
contribution (i.e., matching contributions),
are the contributions subject to the section
4980G comparability rules?
Q–3. If an employer provides HDHP
coverage through a cafeteria plan, but the
employer’s HSA contributions are not
provided through the cafeteria plan, do the
cafeteria plan nondiscrimination rules or the
comparability rules apply to the HSA
contributions?
Q–4. If under the employer’s cafeteria plan,
employees who are eligible individuals and
who participate in health assessments,
disease management programs or wellness
programs receive an employer contribution to
an HSA, unless the employees elect cash, are
the contributions subject to the comparability
rules?
Q–5. May all or part of the excise tax
imposed under section 4980G be waived?
§ 54.4980G–1 Failure of employer to make
comparable health savings account
contributions.
Q–1. What are the comparability rules
that apply to employer contributions to
Health Savings Accounts (HSAs)?
A–1. If an employer makes
contributions to any employee’s HSA,
the employer must make comparable
contributions to the HSAs of all
comparable participating employees.
See Q & A–1 in § 54.4980G–4 for the
definition of comparable contributions.
Comparable participating employees are
eligible individuals (as defined in
section 223(c)(1)) who have the same
category of high deductible health plan
(HDHP) coverage. See sections 4980G(b)
and 4980E(d)(3). See section 223(c)(2)
and (g) for the definition of an HDHP.
See also Q & A–5 in § 54.4980G–3 for
the categories of employees and Q & A–
2 in this section for the categories of
HDHP coverage.
Q–2. What are the categories of HDHP
coverage for purposes of applying the
comparability rules?
A–2. The categories of coverage are
self-only HDHP coverage and family
HDHP coverage. See sections 4980G(b)
and 4980E(d)(3)(B).
Q–3. What is the testing period for
making comparable contributions to
employees’ HSAs?
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50237
A–3. To satisfy the comparability
rules, an employer must make
comparable contributions for the
calendar year to the HSAs of employees
who are comparable participating
employees. See section 4980G(a).
Q–4. How is the excise tax computed
if employer contributions do not satisfy
the comparability rules for a calendar
year?
A–4. (a) Computation of tax. If
employer contributions do not satisfy
the comparability rules for a calendar
year, the employer is subject to an
excise tax equal to 35% of the aggregate
amount contributed by the employer to
HSAs for that period.
(b) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A–4:
Example. In this Example, assume that the
HDHP provided by Employer A satisfies the
definition of an HDHP for the 2007 calendar
year. During the 2007 calendar year,
Employer A has 8 employees who are eligible
individuals with self-only coverage under an
HDHP provided by Employer A. The
deductible for the HDHP is $2,000. For the
2007 calendar year, Employer A contributes
$2,000 each to the HSAs of two employees
and $1,000 each to the HSAs of the other six
employees, for total HSA contributions of
$10,000. Employer A’s contributions do not
satisfy the comparability rules. Therefore,
Employer A is subject to an excise tax of
$3,500 (i.e., 35% x $10,000) for its failure to
make comparable contributions to its
employees’ HSAs.
§ 54.4980G–2
defined.
Employer contribution
Q–1. Do the comparability rules apply
to amounts rolled over from an
employee’s HSA or Archer Medical
Savings Account (Archer MSA)?
A–1. No. The comparability rules do
not apply to amounts rolled over from
an employee’s HSA or Archer MSA.
Q–2. If an employee requests that his
or her employer deduct after-tax
amounts from the employee’s
compensation and forward these
amounts as employee contributions to
the employee’s HSA, do the
comparability rules apply to these
amounts?
A–2. No. Section 106(d) provides that
amounts contributed by an employer to
an eligible employee’s HSA shall be
treated as employer-provided coverage
for medical expenses and are excludible
from the employee’s gross income up to
the limit in section 223(b). After-tax
employee contributions to an HSA are
not subject to the comparability rules
because they are not employer
contributions under section 106(d).
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
50238
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
§ 54.4980G–3 Definition of employee for
comparability testing.
Q–1. Do the comparability rules apply
to contributions that an employer makes
to the HSAs of independent contractors?
A–1. No. The comparability rules
apply only to contributions that an
employer makes to the HSAs of
employees.
Q–2. May a sole proprietor who is an
eligible individual contribute to his or
her own HSA without contributing to
the HSAs of his or her employees who
are eligible individuals?
A–2. (a) Sole proprietor not an
employee. Yes. The comparability rules
apply only to contributions made by an
employer to the HSAs of employees.
Because a sole proprietor is not an
employee, the comparability rules do
not apply to contributions he or she
makes to his or her own HSA. However,
if a sole proprietor contributes to any
employee’s HSA, he or she must make
comparable contributions to the HSAs
of all comparable participating
employees. In determining whether the
comparability rules are satisfied,
contributions that a sole proprietor
makes to his or her own HSA are not
taken into account.
(b) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A–2:
Example. In a calendar year, B, a sole
proprietor is an eligible individual and
contributes $1,000 to B’s own HSA. B also
contributes $500 for the same calendar year
to the HSA of each employee who is an
eligible individual. The comparability rules
are not violated by B’s $1,000 contribution to
B’s own HSA.
Q–3. Do the comparability rules apply
to contributions by a partnership to a
partner’s HSA?
A–3. (a) Partner not an employee. No.
Contributions by a partnership to a bona
fide partner’s HSA are not subject to the
comparability rules because the
contributions are not contributions by
an employer to the HSA of an employee.
The contributions are treated as either
guaranteed payments under section
707(c) or distributions under section
731. However, if a partnership
contributes to the HSAs of employees
who are not partners, the comparability
rules apply to those contributions.
(b) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A–3:
Example. (i) Partnership X is a limited
partnership with three equal individual
partners, A (a general partner), B (a limited
partner), and C (a limited partner). C is to be
paid $300 annually for services rendered to
Partnership X in her capacity as a partner
without regard to partnership income (a
section 707(c)) guaranteed payment). D and
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
E are the only employees of Partnership X
and are not partners in Partnership X. A, B,
C, D, and E are eligible individuals and each
has an HSA. During Partnership X’s Year 1
taxable year, which is also a calendar year,
Partnership X makes the following
contributions—
(A) A $300 contribution to each of A’s and
B’s HSAs which are treated as section 731
distributions to A and B;
(B) A $300 contribution to C’s HSA in lieu
of paying C the guaranteed payment directly;
and
(C) A $200 contribution to each of D’s and
E’s HSAs, who are comparable participating
employees.
(ii) Partnership X’s contributions to A’s
and B’s HSAs are section 731 distributions,
which are treated as cash distributions.
Partnership X’s contribution to C’s HSA is
treated as a guaranteed payment under
section 707(c). The contribution is not
excludible from C’s gross income under
section 106(d) because the contribution is
treated as a distributive share of partnership
income for purposes of all Code sections
other than sections 61(a) and 162(a), and a
guaranteed payment to a partner is not
treated as compensation to an employee.
Thus, Partnership X’s contributions to the
HSAs of A, B, and C are not subject to the
comparability rules. Partnership X’s
contributions to D’s and E’s HSAs are subject
to the comparability rules because D and E
are employees of Partnership X and are not
partners in Partnership X. Partnership X’s
contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
Q–4. How are members of controlled
groups treated when applying the
comparability rules?
A–4. All persons or entities treated as
a single employer under section 414(b),
(c), (m), or (o) are treated as one
employer. See sections 4980G(b) and
4980E(e).
Q–5. What are the categories of
employees for comparability testing?
A–5. (a) Categories. The categories of
employees for comparability testing are
as follows—
(1) Current full-time employees;
(2) Current part-time employees; and
(3) Former employees (except for
former employees with coverage under
the employer’s HDHP because of an
election under a COBRA continuation
provision (as defined in section
9832(d)(1)).
(b) Part-time and full-time employees.
Part-time employees are customarily
employed for fewer than 30 hours per
week and full-time employees are
customarily employed for 30 or more
hours per week. See sections 4980G(b)
and 4980E(d)(4)(A) and (B).
(c) In general. The categories of
employees in paragraph (a) of this Q &
A–5 are the exclusive categories for
comparability testing. An employer
must make comparable contributions to
the HSAs of all comparable
participating employees (eligible
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
individuals who are in the same
category of employees with the same
category of HDHP coverage) during the
calendar year without regard to any
classification other than these
categories. Thus, the comparability rules
do not apply separately to collectively
bargained and non-collectively
bargained employees. Similarly, the
comparability rules do not apply
separately to groups of collectively
bargained employees.
Q–6. Is an employer permitted to
make comparable contributions only to
the HSAs of comparable participating
employees who have coverage under the
employer’s HDHP?
A–6. (a) Employer-provided HDHP
coverage. If during a calendar year, an
employer contributes to the HSA of any
employee who is an eligible individual
covered under an HDHP provided by
the employer, the employer is required
to make comparable contributions to the
HSAs of all comparable participating
employees with coverage under any
HDHP provided by the employer. An
employer that contributes only to the
HSAs of employees who are eligible
individuals with coverage under the
employer’s HDHP is not required to
make comparable contributions to HSAs
of employees who are eligible
individuals but are not covered under
the employer’s HDHP. However, an
employer that contributes to the HSA of
any employee who is an eligible
individual with coverage under any
HDHP, in addition to the HDHPs
provided by the employer, must make
comparable contributions to the HSAs
of all comparable participating
employees whether or not covered
under the employer’s HDHP.
(b) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A–6:
Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer C
offers an HDHP to its full-time employees.
Most full-time employees are covered under
Employer C’s HDHP and Employer C makes
comparable contributions only to these
employees’ HSAs. Employee W, a full-time
employee of Employer C and an eligible
individual, is covered under an HDHP
provided by W’s spouse’s employer and not
under Employer C’s HDHP. Employer C is
not required to make comparable
contributions to W’s HSA.
Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer D
does not offer an HDHP. Several full-time
employees, who are eligible individuals,
have HSAs. Employer D contributes to these
employees’ HSAs. Employer D must make
comparable contributions to the HSAs of all
full-time employees who are eligible
individuals.
Example 3. In a calendar year, Employer E
offers an HDHP to its full-time employees.
Most full-time employees are covered under
Employer E’s HDHP and Employer E makes
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
comparable contributions to these
employees’ HSAs and also to the HSAs of
full-time employees who are eligible
individuals and who are not covered under
Employer E’s HDHP. Employee H, a full-time
employee of Employer E and a comparable
participating employee, is covered under an
HDHP provided by H’s spouse’s employer
and not under Employer E’s HDHP. Employer
E must make comparable contributions to H’s
HSA.
Q–7. If an employee and his or her
spouse are eligible individuals who
work for the same employer and one
employee-spouse has family coverage
for both employees under the
employer’s HDHP, must the employer
make comparable contributions to the
HSAs of both employees?
A–7. (a) In general. If the employer
makes contributions only to the HSAs of
employees who are eligible individuals
covered under its HDHP, the employer
is not required to contribute to the HSAs
of both employee-spouses. The
employer is required to contribute to the
HSA of the employee-spouse with
coverage under the employer’s HDHP,
but is not required to contribute to the
HSA of the employee-spouse covered
under the employer’s HDHP by virtue of
his or her spouse’s coverage. However,
if the employer contributes to the HSA
of any employee who is an eligible
individual with coverage under any
HDHP, the employer must make
comparable contributions to the HSAs
of both employee-spouses if they are
both eligible individuals. If an employer
is required to contribute to the HSAs of
both employee-spouses, the employer is
not required to contribute amounts in
excess of the annual contribution limits
in section 223(b).
(b) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A–7:
Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer F
offers an HDHP to its full-time employees.
Most full-time employees are covered under
Employer F’s HDHP and Employer F makes
comparable contributions only to these
employees’ HSAs. Employee H, a full-time
employee of Employer F and an eligible
individual has family coverage under
Employer F’s HDHP for H and H’s spouse,
Employee W, who is also a full-time
employee of Employer F and an eligible
individual. Employer F is required to make
comparable contributions to H’s HSA, but is
not required to make comparable
contributions to W’s HSA.
Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer G
offers an HDHP to its full-time employees.
Most full-time employees are covered under
Employer G’s HDHP and Employer G makes
comparable contributions to these
employees’ HSAs and to the HSAs of fulltime employees who are eligible individuals
but are not covered under Employer G’s
HDHP. Employee W, a full-time employee of
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Employer G and an eligible individual, has
family coverage under Employer G’s HDHP
for W and W’s spouse, Employee H, who is
also a full-time employee of Employer G and
an eligible individual. Employer G must
make comparable contributions to W’s HSA
and to H’s HSA.
Q–8. Does an employer that makes
HSA contributions only for nonmanagement employees who are eligible
individuals, but not for management
employees who are eligible individuals
or that makes HSA contributions only
for management employees who are
eligible individuals but not for nonmanagement employees who are eligible
individuals satisfy the requirement that
the employer make comparable
contributions?
A–8. (a) Management v. nonmanagement. No. If management
employees and non-management
employees are comparable participating
employees, the comparability rules are
not satisfied. However, if nonmanagement employees are comparable
participating employees and
management employees are not
comparable participating employees, the
comparability rules may be satisfied.
But see Q & A–1 in § 54.4980G–5 on
contributions made through a cafeteria
plan.
(b) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A–8:
Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer H
maintains an HDHP covering all management
and non-management employees. Employer
H contributes $1,000 for the calendar year to
the HSA of each non-management employee
who is an eligible individual covered under
its HDHP. Employer H does not contribute to
the HSAs of any of its management
employees who are eligible individuals
covered under its HDHP. The comparability
rules are not satisfied.
Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer J
maintains an HDHP for non-management
employees only. Employer J does not
maintain an HDHP for its management
employees. Employer J contributes $1,000 for
the calendar year to the HSA of each nonmanagement employee who is an eligible
individual with coverage under its HDHP.
Employer J does not contribute to the HSAs
of any of its non-management employees not
covered under its HDHP or to the HSAs of
any of its management employees. The
comparability rules are satisfied.
Example 3. In a calendar year, Employer K
maintains an HDHP for management
employees only. Employer K does not
maintain an HDHP for its non-management
employees. Employer K contributes $1,000
for the calendar year to the HSA of each
management employee who is an eligible
individual with coverage under its HDHP.
Employer K does not contribute to the HSAs
of any of its management employees not
covered under its HDHP or to the HSAs of
any of its non-management employees. The
comparability rules are satisfied.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50239
Q–9. If an employer contributes to the
HSAs of former employees who are
eligible individuals, do the
comparability rules apply to these
contributions?
A–9. (a) Former employees. Yes. The
comparability rules apply to
contributions an employer makes to
former employees’ HSAs. Therefore, if
an employer contributes to any former
employee’s HSA, it must make
comparable contributions to the HSAs
of all comparable participating former
employees (former employees who are
eligible individuals with the same
category of HDHP coverage). However,
an employer is not required to make
comparable contributions to the HSAs
of former employees with coverage
under the employer’s HDHP because of
an election under a COBRA
continuation provision (as defined in
section 9832(d)(1)). See Q & A–5 and
Q & A–11 in this section. The
comparability rules apply separately to
former employees because they are a
separate category of covered employee.
See Q & A–5 in this section.
(b) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A–9:
Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer L
contributes $1,000 for the calendar year to
the HSA of each current employee who is an
eligible individual with coverage under any
HDHP. Employer L does not contribute to the
HSA of any former employee who is an
eligible individual. Employer L’s
contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer M
contributes to the HSAs of current employees
and former employees who are eligible
individuals covered under any HDHP.
Employer M contributes $750 to the HSA of
each current employee with self-only HDHP
coverage and $1,000 to the HSA of each
current employee with family HDHP
coverage. Employer M also contributes $300
to the HSA of each former employee with
self-only HDHP coverage and $400 to the
HSA of each former employee with family
HDHP coverage. Employer M’s contributions
satisfy the comparability rules.
Q–10. Is an employer permitted to
make comparable contributions only to
the HSAs of comparable participating
former employees who have coverage
under the employer’s HDHP?
A–10. If during a calendar year, an
employer contributes to the HSA of any
former employee who is an eligible
individual covered under an HDHP
provided by the employer, the employer
is required to make comparable
contributions to the HSAs of all former
employees who are comparable
participating former employees with
coverage under any HDHP provided by
the employer. An employer that
contributes only to the HSAs of former
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
50240
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
employees who are eligible individuals
with coverage under the employer’s
HDHP is not required to make
comparable contributions to the HSAs
of former employees who are eligible
individuals and who are not covered
under the employer’s HDHP. However,
an employer that contributes to the HSA
of any former employee who is an
eligible individual with coverage under
any HDHP, even if that coverage is not
the employer’s HDHP, must make
comparable contributions to the HSAs
of all former employees who are eligible
individuals whether or not covered
under an HDHP of the employer.
Q–11. If an employer contributes only
to the HSAs of former employees who
are eligible individuals with coverage
under the employer’s HDHP, must the
employer make comparable
contributions to the HSAs of former
employees who are eligible individuals
with coverage under the employer’s
HDHP because of an election under a
COBRA continuation provision (as
defined in section 9832(d)(1))?
A–11. No. An employer that
contributes only to the HSAs of former
employees who are eligible individuals
with coverage under the employer’s
HDHP is not required to make
comparable contributions to the HSAs
of former employees who are eligible
individuals with coverage under the
employer’s HDHP because of an election
under a COBRA continuation provision
(as defined in section 9832(d)(1)).
Q–12. How do the comparability rules
apply if some employees have HSAs
and other employees have Archer
MSAs?
A–12. (a) HSAs and Archer MSAs.
The comparability rules apply
separately to employees who have HSAs
and employees who have Archer MSAs.
However, if an employee has both an
HSA and an Archer MSA, the employer
may contribute to either the HSA or the
Archer MSA, but not to both.
(b) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A–12:
Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer N
contributes $600 to the Archer MSA of each
employee who is an eligible individual and
who has an Archer MSA. Employer N
contributes $500 for the calendar year to the
HSA of each employee who is an eligible
individual and who has an HSA. If an
employee has both an Archer MSA and an
HSA, Employer N contributes to the
employee’s Archer MSA and not to the
employee’s HSA. Employee X has an Archer
MSA and an HSA. Employer N contributes
$600 for the calendar year to X’s Archer MSA
but does not contribute to X’s HSA. Employer
N’s contributions satisfy the comparability
rules.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Example 2. Same facts as Example 1,
except that if an employee has both an
Archer MSA and an HSA, Employer N
contributes to the employee’s HSA and not
to the employee’s Archer MSA. Employer N
contributes $500 for the calendar year to X’s
HSA but does not contribute to X’s Archer
MSA. Employer N’s contributions satisfy the
comparability rules.
§ 54.4980G–4 Calculating comparable
contributions.
Q–1. What are comparable
contributions?
A–1. (a) Definition. Contributions are
comparable if they are either the same
amount or the same percentage of the
deductible under the HDHP for
employees who are eligible individuals
with the same category of coverage.
Employees with self-only HDHP
coverage are tested separately from
employees with family HDHP coverage.
See Q & A–1 and Q & A–2 in
§ 54.4980G–1. An employer is not
required to contribute the same amount
or the same percentage of the deductible
for employees who are eligible
individuals with self-only HDHP
coverage that it contributes for
employees who are eligible individuals
with family HDHP coverage. An
employer that satisfies the
comparability rules by contributing the
same amount to the HSAs of all
employees who are eligible individuals
with self-only HDHP coverage is not
required to contribute any amount to the
HSAs of employees who are eligible
individuals with family HDHP coverage,
or to contribute the same percentage of
the family HDHP deductible as the
amount contributed with respect to selfonly HDHP coverage. Similarly, an
employer that satisfies the
comparability rules by contributing the
same amount to the HSAs of all
employees who are eligible individuals
with family HDHP coverage is not
required to contribute any amount to the
HSAs of employees who are eligible
individuals with self-only HDHP
coverage, or to contribute the same
percentage of the self-only HDHP
deductible as the amount contributed
with respect to family HDHP coverage.
(b) Examples. Assume that the HDHPs
in Example 1 through Example 7 satisfy
the definition of an HDHP for the 2007
calendar year. The following examples
illustrate the rules in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A–1:
Example 1. In the 2007 calendar year,
Employer A offers its full-time employees
three health plans, including an HDHP with
self-only coverage and a $2,000 deductible.
Employer A contributes $1,000 for the
calendar year to the HSA of each employee
who is an eligible individual electing the
self-only HDHP coverage. Employer A makes
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
no HSA contributions for employees with
family HDHP coverage or for employees who
do not elect the employer’s self-only HDHP.
Employer A’s HSA contributions satisfy the
comparability rules.
Example 2. In the 2007 calendar year,
Employer B offers its employees an HDHP
with a $3,000 deductible for self-only
coverage and a $4,000 deductible for family
coverage. Employer B contributes $1,000 for
the calendar year to the HSA of each
employee who is an eligible individual
electing the self-only HDHP coverage.
Employer B contributes $2,000 for the
calendar year to the HSA of each employee
who is an eligible individual electing the
family HDHP coverage. Employer B’s HSA
contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
Example 3. In the 2007 calendar year,
Employer C offers its employees an HDHP
with a $1,500 deductible for self-only
coverage and a $3,000 deductible for family
coverage. Employer C contributes $1,000 for
the calendar year to the HSA of each
employee who is an eligible individual
electing the self-only HDHP coverage.
Employer C contributes $1,000 for the
calendar year to the HSA of each employee
who is an eligible individual electing the
family HDHP coverage. Employer C’s HSA
contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
Example 4. In the 2007 calendar year,
Employer D offers its employees an HDHP
with a $1,500 deductible for self-only
coverage and a $3,000 deductible for family
coverage. Employer D contributes $1,500 for
the calendar year to the HSA of each
employee who is an eligible individual
electing the self-only HDHP coverage.
Employer D contributes $1,000 for the
calendar year to the HSA of each employee
who is an eligible individual electing the
family HDHP coverage. Employer D’s HSA
contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
Example 5. (i) In the 2007 calendar year,
Employer E maintains two HDHPs. Plan A
has a $2,000 deductible for self-only coverage
and a $4,000 deductible for family coverage.
Plan B has a $2,500 deductible for self-only
coverage and a $4,500 deductible for family
coverage. For the calendar year, Employer E
makes contributions to the HSA of each fulltime employee who is an eligible individual
covered under Plan A of $600 for self-only
coverage and $1,000 for family coverage.
Employer E satisfies the comparability rules,
if it makes either of the following
contributions for the 2007 calendar year to
the HSA of each full-time employee who is
an eligible individual covered under Plan
B—
(A) $600 for each full-time employee with
self-only coverage and $1,000 for each fulltime employee with family coverage; or
(B) $750 for each employee with self-only
coverage and $1,125 for each employee with
family coverage (the same percentage of the
deductible Employer E contributes for fulltime employees covered under Plan A, 30%
of the deductible for self-only coverage and
25% of the deductible for family coverage).
(ii) Employer E also makes contributions to
the HSA of each part-time employee who is
an eligible individual covered under Plan A
of $300 for self-only coverage and $500 for
family coverage. Employer E satisfies the
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
comparability rules, if it makes either of the
following contributions for the 2007 calendar
year to the HSA of each part-time employee
who is an eligible individual covered under
Plan B—
(A) $300 for each part-time employee with
self-only coverage and $500 for each parttime employee with family coverage; or
(B) $375 for each part-time employee with
self-only coverage and $563 for each parttime employee with family coverage (the
same percentage of the deductible Employer
E contributes for part-time employees
covered under Plan A, 15% of the deductible
for self-only coverage and 12.5% of the
deductible for family coverage).
Example 6. (i) In the 2007 calendar year,
Employer F maintains an HDHP. The HDHP
has a $2,500 deductible for self-only
coverage, and the following family coverage
options—
(A) A $3,500 deductible for self plus one
dependent;
(B) A $3,500 deductible for self plus
spouse;
(C) A $3,500 deductible for self plus two
or more dependents;
(D) A $3,500 deductible for self plus
spouse and one dependent; and
(E) A $3,500 deductible for self plus spouse
and two or more dependents.
(ii) Employer F makes the following
contributions for the calendar year to the
HSA of each full-time employee who is an
eligible individual covered under the
HDHP—
(A) $750 for self-only coverage;
(B) $1,000 for self plus one dependent;
(C) $1,000 for self plus spouse;
(D) $1,000 for self plus two or more
dependents;
(E) $1,000 for self plus spouse and one
dependent; and
(F) $1,000 for self plus spouse and two or
more dependents.
(iii) Employer F’s HSA contributions
satisfy the comparability rules.
Example 7. (i) In the 2007 calendar year,
Employer G maintains an HDHP. The HDHP
has a $1,800 deductible for self-only coverage
and the following family coverage options—
(A) A $3,500 deductible for self plus one
dependent;
(B) A $3,800 deductible for self plus
spouse;
(C) A $4,000 deductible for self plus two
or more dependents;
(D) A $4,500 deductible for self plus
spouse and one dependent; and
(E) A $5,000 deductible for self plus spouse
and two or more dependents.
(ii) Employer G makes the following
contributions for the calendar year to the
HSA of each full-time employee who is an
eligible individual covered under the
HDHP—
(A) $360 for self-only coverage;
(B) $875 for self plus one dependent;
(C) $950 for self plus spouse;
(D) $1,000 for self plus two or more
dependents;
(E) $1,125 for self plus spouse and one
dependent; and
(F) $1,250 for self plus spouse and two or
more dependents.
(iii) Employer G’s HSA contributions
satisfy the comparability rules because
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Employer G has made contributions that are
the same percentage of the deductible for
eligible employees with the same category of
coverage (20% of the deductible for eligible
employees with self-only coverage and 25%
of the deductible for eligible employees with
family coverage). Employer G could also
satisfy the comparability rules by
contributing the same dollar amount for each
category of coverage.
Example 8. In a calendar year, Employer H
offers its employees an HDHP and a health
flexible spending arrangement (health FSA).
The health FSA reimburses employees for
medical expenses as defined in section
213(d). Some of Employer H’s employees
have coverage under the HDHP and the
health FSA. For the calendar year, Employer
H contributes $500 to the HSA of each of
employee who is an eligible individual, but
does not contribute to the HSAs of employees
who have coverage under the health FSA or
under a spouse’s health FSA. In addition,
some of Employer H’s employees have
coverage under the HDHP and are enrolled in
Medicare. Employer H does not contribute to
the HSAs of employees who are enrolled in
Medicare. The employees who have coverage
under the health FSA or under a spouse’s
health FSA are not comparable participating
employees because they are not eligible
individuals under section 223(c)(1).
Similarly, the employees who are enrolled in
Medicare are not comparable participating
employees because they are not eligible
individuals under section 223(b)(7) and
(c)(1). Therefore, employees who have
coverage under the health FSA or under a
spouse’s health FSA and employees who are
enrolled in Medicare are excluded from
comparability testing. See sections 4980G(b)
and 4980E. Employer H’s contributions
satisfy the comparability rules.
Q–2. How do the comparability rules
apply to employer contributions to
employees’ HSAs if some employees
work full-time during the entire
calendar year, and other employees
work full-time for less than the entire
calendar year?
A–2. Employer contributions to the
HSAs of employees who work full-time
for less than twelve months satisfy the
comparability rules if the contribution
amount is comparable when determined
on a month-to-month basis. For
example, if the employer contributes
$240 to the HSA of each full-time
employee who works the entire calendar
year, the employer must contribute $60
to the HSA of a full-time employee who
works three months of the calendar
year. The rules set forth this Q & A–2
apply to employer contributions made
on a pay-as-you-go basis or on a lookback-basis as described in Q & A–3 in
this section. See sections 4980G(b) and
4980E(d)(2)(B).
Q–3. How does an employer comply
with the comparability rules when some
employees who are eligible individuals
do not work for the employer during the
entire calendar year?
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50241
A–3. (a) In general. In determining
whether the comparability rules are
satisfied, an employer must take into
account all full-time and part-time
employees who were employees and
eligible individuals for any month
during the calendar year. (Full-time and
part-time employees are tested
separately. See Q & A–5 in § 54.4980G–
3.) There are two methods to comply
with the comparability rules when some
employees who are eligible individuals
do not work for the employer during the
entire calendar year; contributions may
be made on a pay-as-you-go basis or on
a look-back basis. See Q & A–9 through
Q & A–11 in § 54.4980G–3 for the rules
regarding comparable contributions to
the HSAs of former employees.
(b) Contributions on a pay-as-you-go
basis. An employer may comply with
the comparability rules by contributing
amounts at one or more times for the
calendar year to the HSAs of employees
who are eligible individuals, if
contributions are the same amount or
the same percentage of the HDHP
deductible for employees who are
eligible individuals as of the first day of
the month with the same category of
coverage and are made at the same time.
Contributions made at the employer’s
usual payroll interval for different
groups of employees are considered to
be made at the same time. For example,
if salaried employees are paid monthly
and hourly employees are paid biweekly, an employer may contribute to
the HSAs of hourly employees on a biweekly basis and to the HSAs of salaried
employees on a monthly basis. An
employer may change the amount that
it contributes to the HSAs of employees
at any point. However, the changed
contribution amounts must satisfy the
comparability rules.
(c) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules in paragraph (b) of
this Q & A–3:
Example 1. (i) Beginning on January 1st,
Employer J contributes $50 per month on the
first day of each month to the HSA of each
employee who is an eligible individual.
Employer J does not contribute to the HSAs
of former employees. In mid-March of the
same year, Employee X, an eligible
individual, terminates employment after
Employer J has contributed $150 to X’s HSA.
After X terminates employment, Employer J
does not contribute additional amounts to X’s
HSA. In mid-April of the same year,
Employer J hires Employee Y, an eligible
individual, and contributes $50 to Y’s HSA
in May and $50 in June. Effective in July of
the same year, Employer J stops contributing
to the HSAs of all employees and makes no
contributions to the HSA of any employee for
the months of July through December. In
August, Employer J hires Employee Z, an
eligible individual. Employer J does not
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
50242
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
contribute to Z’s HSA. After Z is hired,
Employer J does not hire additional
employees. As of the end of the calendar
year, Employer J has made the following HSA
contributions to its employees’ HSAs—
(A) Employer J contributed $150 to X’s
HSA;
(B) Employer J contributed $100 to Y’s
HSA;
(C) Employer J did not contribute to Z’s
HSA; and
(D) Employer J contributed $300 to the
HSA of each employee who was an eligible
individual and employed by Employer from
January through June.
(ii) Employer J’s contributions satisfy the
comparability rules.
Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer K
offers its employees an HDHP and
contributes on a monthly pay-as-you go-basis
to the HSAs of employees who are eligible
individuals with coverage under Employer
K’s HDHP. In the calendar year, Employer K
contributes $50 per month to the HSA of
each of employee with self-only HDHP
coverage and $100 per month to the HSA of
each employee with family HDHP coverage.
From January 1st through March 30th of the
calendar year, Employee X is an eligible
individual with self-only HDHP coverage.
From April 1st through December 30th of the
calendar year, X is an eligible individual
with family HDHP coverage. For the months
of January, February and March of the
calendar year, Employer K contributes $50
per month to X’s HSA. For the remaining
months of the calendar year, Employer K
contributes $100 per month to X’s HSA.
Employer K’s contributions to X’s HSA
satisfy the comparability rules.
(d) Contributions on a look-back
basis. An employer may also satisfy the
comparability rules by determining
comparable contributions for the
calendar year at the end of the calendar
year, taking into account all employees
who were eligible individuals for any
month during the calendar year and
contributing the correct amount (a
percentage of the HDHP deductible or a
specified dollar amount for the same
categories of coverage) to the employees’
HSAs.
(e) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules in paragraph (d) of
this Q & A–3:
Example. In a calendar year, Employer L
offers its employees an HDHP and
contributes on a look-back-basis to the HSAs
of employees who are eligible individuals
with coverage under Employer L’s HDHP.
Employer L contributes $600 (i.e. $50 per
month) for the calendar year to the HSA of
each of employee with self-only HDHP
coverage and $1,200 (i.e., $100 per month)
for the calendar year to the HSA of each
employee with family HDHP coverage. From
January 1st through June 30th of the calendar
year, Employee Y is an eligible individual
with family HDHP coverage. From July 1st
through December 31, Y is an eligible
individual with self-only HDHP coverage.
Employer L contributes $900 on a look-backbasis for the calendar year to Y’s HSA ($100
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
per month for the months of January through
June and $50 per month for the months of
July through December). Employer L’s
contributions to Y’s HSA satisfy the
comparability rules.
Q–4. May an employer make all of its
contributions to the HSAs of its
employees who are eligible individuals
at the beginning of the calendar year
(i.e., on a pre-funded basis) instead of
contributing on a pay-as-you-go or on a
look-back basis?
A–4. (a) Contributions on a prefunded basis. Yes. An employer may
make all of its contributions to the HSAs
of its employees who are eligible
individuals at the beginning of the
calendar year. An employer that prefunds the HSAs of its employees will
not fail to satisfy the comparability rules
because an employee who terminates
employment prior to the end of the
calendar year has received more
contributions on a monthly basis than
employees who have worked the entire
calendar year. See Q & A–12 in this
section. Under section 223(d)(1)(E), an
account beneficiary’s interest in an HSA
is nonforfeitable. An employer must
make comparable contributions for all
employees who are comparable
participating employees for any month
during the calendar year, including
employees who are eligible individuals
hired after the date of initial funding.
An employer that makes HSA
contributions on a pre-funded basis may
also contribute on a pre-funded-basis to
the HSAs of employees who are eligible
individuals hired after the date of initial
funding. Alternatively, an employer that
has pre-funded the HSAs of comparable
participating employees may contribute
to the HSAs of employees who are
eligible individuals hired after the date
of initial funding on a pay-as-you-go
basis or on a look-back basis. An
employer that makes HSA contributions
on a pre-funded basis must use the same
contribution method for all employees
who are eligible individuals hired after
the date of initial funding.
(b) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A–4:
Example. (i) On January 1, Employer M
contributes $1,200 for the calendar year on a
pre-funded basis to the HSA of each of
employee who is an eligible individual. In
mid-May, Employer M hires Employee B, an
eligible individual. Therefore, Employer M is
required to make comparable contributions to
B’s HSA beginning in June. Employer M
satisfies the comparability rules with respect
to contributions to B’s HSA if it makes HSA
contributions in any one of the following
ways—
(A) Pre-funding B’s HSA by contributing
$700 to B’s HSA;
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(B) Contributing $100 per month on a payas-you-go basis to B’s HSA; or
(C) Contributing to B’s HSA at the end of
the calendar year taking into account each
month that B was an eligible individual and
employed by Employer M.
(ii) If Employer M hires additional
employees who are eligible individuals after
initial funding, it must use the same
contribution method for these employees that
it used to contribute to B’s HSA.
Q–5. Must an employer use the same
contribution method as described in Q
& A–3 and Q & A–4 of this section for
all employees who were comparable
participating employees for any month
during the calendar year?
A–5. Yes. If an employer makes
comparable HSA contributions on a
pay-as-you-go basis, it must do so for
each employee who is a comparable
participating employee during the pay
period. If an employer makes
comparable contributions on a lookback basis, it must do so for each
employee who was a comparable
participating employee for any month
during the calendar year. If an employer
makes HSA contributions on a prefunded basis, it must do so for all
employees who are comparable
participating employees at the
beginning of the calendar year. An
employer that contributes on a prefunded basis must make comparable
HSA contributions for all employees
who are comparable participating
employees for any month during the
calendar year, including employees who
are eligible individuals hired after the
date of initial funding. See Q & A–4 in
this section for rules regarding
contributions for employees hired after
initial funding.
Q–6. How does an employer comply
with the comparability rules if an
employee has not established an HSA at
the time the employer contributes to its
employees’ HSAs?
A–6. (a) Employee has not established
an HSA. If an employee has not
established an HSA at the time the
employer funds its employees’ HSAs,
the employer complies with the
comparability rules by contributing
comparable amounts to the employee’s
HSA when the employee establishes the
HSA, taking into account each month
that the employee was a comparable
participating employee. However, an
employer is not required to make
comparable contributions for a calendar
year to an employee’s HSA if the
employee has not established an HSA
by December 31st of the calendar year.
(b) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A–6:
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Example. Beginning on January 1st,
Employer N contributes $500 per calendar
year on a pay-as-you-go basis to the HSA of
each employee who is an eligible individual.
Employee C is an eligible individual during
the entire calendar year but does not
establish an HSA until March.
Notwithstanding C’s delay in establishing an
HSA, Employer N must make up the missed
HSA contributions for January and February
by April 15th of the following calendar year.
Q–7. If an employer bases its
contributions on a percentage of the
HDHP deductible, how is the correct
percentage or dollar amount computed?
A–7. (a) Computing HSA
contributions. The correct percentage is
determined by rounding to nearest
1/100th of a percentage point and the
dollar amount is determined by
rounding to the nearest whole dollar.
(b) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A–7:
Example. In this Example, assume that the
HDHP provided by Employer P satisfies the
definition of an HDHP for the 2007 calendar
year. In the 2007 calendar year, Employer P
maintains two HDHPs. Plan A has a
deductible of $3,000 for self-only coverage.
Employer P contributes $1,000 for the
calendar year to the HSA of each employee
covered under Plan A. Plan B has a
deductible of $3,500 for self-only coverage.
Employer P satisfies the comparability rules
if it makes either of the following
contributions for the 2007 calendar year to
the HSA of each employee who is an eligible
individual with self-only coverage under
Plan B—
(i) $1,000; or
(ii) $1,167 (33.33% of the deductible
rounded to the nearest whole dollar amount).
Q–8. Does an employer that
contributes to the HSA of each
comparable participating employee in
an amount equal to the employee’s HSA
contribution or a percentage of the
employee’s HSA contribution (matching
contributions) satisfy the rule that all
comparable participating employees
receive comparable contributions?
A–8. No. If all comparable
participating employees do not
contribute the same amount to their
HSAs and, consequently, do not receive
comparable contributions to their HSAs,
the comparability rules are not satisfied,
notwithstanding that the employer
offers to make available the same
contribution amount to each comparable
participating employee. But see Q & A–
1 in § 54.4980G–5 on contributions to
HSAs made through a cafeteria plan.
Q–9. If an employer conditions
contributions by the employer to an
employee’s HSA on an employee’s
participation in health assessments,
disease management programs or
wellness programs and makes the same
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
contributions available to all employees
who participate in the programs, do the
contributions satisfy the comparability
rules?
A–9. No. If all comparable
participating employees do not elect to
participate in all the programs and
consequently, all comparable
participating employees do not receive
comparable contributions to their HSAs,
the employer contributions fail to satisfy
the comparability rules. But see Q & A–
1 in § 54.4980G–5 on contributions
made to HSAs through a cafeteria plan.
Q–10. If an employer makes
additional contributions to the HSAs of
all comparable participating employees
who have attained a specified age or
who have worked for the employer for
a specified number of years, do the
contributions satisfy the comparability
rules?
A–10. No. If all comparable
participating employees do not meet the
age or length of service requirement, all
comparable participating employees do
not receive comparable contributions to
their HSAs and the employer
contributions fail to satisfy the
comparability rules.
Q–11. If an employer makes
additional contributions to the HSAs of
all comparable participating employees
who qualify for the additional
contributions (HSA catch-up
contributions) under section 223(b)(3),
do the contributions satisfy the
comparability rules?
A–11. No. If all comparable
participating employees do not qualify
for the additional HSA contributions
under section 223(b)(3), all comparable
participating employees do not receive
comparable contributions to their HSAs,
and the employer contributions fail to
satisfy the comparability rules.
Q–12. If an employer’s contributions
to an employee’s HSA result in noncomparable contributions, may the
employer recoup the excess amount
from the employee’s HSA?
A–12. No. An employer may not
recoup from an employee’s HSA any
portion of the employer’s contribution
to the employee’s HSA. Under section
223(d)(1)(E), an account beneficiary’s
interest in an HSA is nonforfeitable.
However, an employer may make
additional HSA contributions to satisfy
the comparability rules. An employer
may contribute up until April 15th
following the calendar year in which the
non-comparable contributions were
made. An employer that makes
additional HSA contributions to correct
non-comparable contributions must also
contribute reasonable interest. However,
an employer is not required to
contribute amounts in excess of the
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50243
annual contribution limits in section
223(b).
§ 54.4980G–5 HSA comparability rules and
cafeteria plans and waiver of excise tax.
Q–1. If an employer makes
contributions through a section 125
cafeteria plan to the HSA of each
employee who is an eligible individual
are the contributions subject to the
comparability rules?
A–1. No. The comparability rules do
not apply to HSA contributions that an
employer makes through a section 125
cafeteria plan. However, contributions
to an HSA made under a cafeteria plan
are subject to the section 125
nondiscrimination rules (eligibility
rules, contributions and benefits tests
and key employee concentration tests).
See section 125(b), (c) and (g) and Prop.
Treas. Reg. § 1.125–1, Q & A–19, (49 FR
19321).
Q–2. If an employer makes
contributions through a cafeteria plan to
the HSA of each employee who is an
eligible individual in an amount equal
to the amount of the employee’s HSA
contribution or a percentage of the
amount of the employee’s HSA
contribution (i.e., matching
contributions), are the contributions
subject to the section 4980G
comparability rules?
A–2. No. The comparability rules do
not apply to HSA contributions that an
employer makes through a section 125
cafeteria plan. Thus, where matching
contributions are made by an employer
through a cafeteria plan, the
contributions are not subject to the
comparability rules of section 4980G.
However, contributions, including
matching contributions, to an HSA
made under a cafeteria plan are subject
to the section 125 nondiscrimination
rules (eligibility rules, contributions and
benefits tests and key employee
concentration tests). See Q & A–1 in this
section.
Q–3. If an employer provides HDHP
coverage through a cafeteria plan, but
the employer’s HSA contributions are
not provided through the cafeteria plan,
do the cafeteria plan nondiscrimination
rules or the comparability rules apply to
the HSA contributions?
A–3. (a) HDHP provided through
cafeteria plan. The comparability rules
in section 4980G apply to the HSA
contributions. The cafeteria plan
nondiscrimination rules apply only to
HSA contributions made through a
cafeteria plan irrespective of whether
the HDHP is provided through a
cafeteria plan.
(b) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A–3:
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
50244
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Example. Employer A provides HDHP
coverage through its cafeteria plan. Employer
A automatically contributes to the HSA of
each employee who is an eligible individual
with HDHP coverage through the cafeteria
plan. Employees make no election with
respect to Employer A’s HSA contributions
and have no right to receive cash or other
taxable benefits in lieu of the HSA
contributions. Employer A contributes only
to the HSAs of employees who have elected
HDHP coverage through the cafeteria plan.
The comparability rules apply to Employer
A’s HSA contributions because the HSA
contributions are not made through the
cafeteria plan.
Q–4. If under the employer’s cafeteria
plan, employees who are eligible
individuals and who participate in
health assessments, disease
management programs or wellness
programs receive an employer
contribution to an HSA, unless the
employees elect cash, are the
contributions subject to the
comparability rules?
A–4. No. The comparability rules do
not apply to employer contributions to
an HSA made through a cafeteria plan.
See Q & A–1 in this section.
Q–5. May all or part of the excise tax
imposed under section 4980G be
waived?
A–5. In the case of a failure which is
due to reasonable cause and not to
willful neglect, all or a portion of the
excise tax imposed under section 4980G
may be waived to the extent that the
payment of the tax would be excessive
relative to the failure involved. See
sections 4980G(b) and 4980E(c).
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 05–16941 Filed 8–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 948
[WV–106–FOR]
West Virginia Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of
a proposed amendment to the West
Virginia regulatory program (the West
Virginia program) under the Surface
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (SMCRA or the Act). West Virginia
proposes revisions to the Code of West
Virginia (W. Va. Code) and the Code of
State Regulations (CSR) as authorized by
several bills passed during the State’s
2005 Legislative Session. West Virginia
is also proposing an amendment that
affects the State’s regulations
concerning erosion protection zones
(EPZ) associated with durable rock fills.
The State is revising its program to be
consistent with certain corresponding
Federal requirements, and to include
other amendments at its own initiative.
The amendments include, among other
things, changes to the State’s surface
mining and blasting regulations as
authorized by Committee Substitute for
House Bill 2723; various statutory
changes to the State’s approved program
as a result of the passage of Committee
Substitute for House Bill 3033 and
House Bills 2333 and 3236; the
submission of a draft policy regarding
the State’s EPZ requirement and
requesting that the Office of Surface
Mining (OSM) reconsider its previous
decision concerning EPZ; State water
rights and replacement policy
identifying the timing of water supply
replacement; the revised Permittee’s
Request For Release form; and the
submission of a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) between the West
Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection (WVDEP), Division of Mining
and Reclamation, and the West Virginia
Division of Natural Resources, Wildlife
Resources Section that is intended to
partially resolve a required program
amendment relating to planting
arrangements for Homestead postmining land use.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m. (local time), on September 26,
2005. If requested, we will hold a public
hearing on the amendment on
September 20, 2005. We will accept
requests to speak at a hearing until 4
p.m. (local time), on September 12,
2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by WV–106–FOR, by any of
the following methods:
• E-mail: chfo@osmre.gov. Include
WV–106–FOR in the subject line of the
message;
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. Roger W.
Calhoun, Director, Charleston Field
Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1027
Virginia Street, East, Charleston, West
Virginia 25301; or
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency docket number
for this rulemaking. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see the ‘‘Public
Comment Procedures’’ heading in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. You may also request to
speak at a public hearing by any of the
methods listed above or by contacting
the individual listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the
West Virginia program, this amendment,
a listing of any scheduled public
hearings, and all written comments
received in response to this document at
the addresses listed below during
normal business hours, Monday through
Friday, excluding holidays. You may
also receive one free copy of this
amendment by contacting OSM’s
Charleston Field Office listed below.
Mr. Roger W. Calhoun, Director,
Charleston Field Office, Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 1027 Virginia Street, East,
Charleston, West Virginia 25301,
Telephone: (304) 347–7158. E-mail:
chfo@osmre.gov.
West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection, 601 57th
Street, SE, Charleston, West Virginia
25304, Telephone: (304) 926–0490.
In addition, you may review a copy of
the amendment during regular business
hours at the following locations:
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, Morgantown Area
Office, 75 High Street, Room 229, P.O.
Box 886, Morgantown, West Virginia
26507, Telephone: (304) 291–4004. (By
Appointment Only)
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, Beckley Area Office,
323 Harper Park Drive, Suite 3, Beckley,
West Virginia 25801, Telephone: (304)
255–5265.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Roger W. Calhoun, Director, Charleston
Field Office, Telephone: (304) 347–
7158. Internet: chfo@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the West Virginia Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the West Virginia
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘* * * a
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50233-50244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16941]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 54
[REG-138647-04]
RIN 1545-BE30
Employer Comparable Contributions to Health Savings Accounts
Under Section 4980G
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations providing guidance
on employer comparable contributions to Health Savings Accounts (HSAs)
under section 4980G. In general, these proposed regulations would
affect employers that contribute to employees' HSAs.
DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing
must be received by November 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-138647-04), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, POB 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
138647-04), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Alternatively, taxpayers may submit
comments electronically via the IRS Internet site at www.irs.gov/regs
or via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (IRS-REG-
138647-04).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
[[Page 50234]]
Barbara E. Pie at (202) 622-6080; concerning submissions of comments or
a request for a public hearing, Kelly Banks at (202) 622-7180 (not
toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed Pension Excise Tax Regulations (26
CFR part 54) under section 4980G of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
Under section 4980G of the Code, an excise tax is imposed on an
employer that fails to make comparable contributions to the HSAs of its
employees.
Section 1201 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003 (Act), Public Law 108-173, (117 Stat. 2066,
2003) added section 223 to the Code to permit eligible individuals to
establish HSAs for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2003.
Section 4980G was also added to the Code by the Act. Section 4980G(a)
imposes an excise tax on the failure of an employer to make comparable
contributions to the HSAs of its employees for a calendar year. Section
4980G(b) provides that rules and requirements similar to section 4980E
(the comparability rules for Archer Medical Savings Accounts (Archer
MSAs)) apply for purposes of section 4980G. Section 4980E(b) imposes an
excise tax equal to 35% of the aggregate amount contributed by the
employer to the Archer MSAs of employees during the calendar year if an
employer fails to make comparable contributions to the Archer MSAs of
its employees in a calendar year. Therefore, if an employer fails to
make comparable contributions to the HSAs of its employees during a
calendar year, an excise tax equal to 35% of the aggregate amount
contributed by the employer to the HSAs of its employees during that
calendar year is imposed on the employer. See Sections 4980G(a) and (b)
and 4980E(b). See also Notice 2004-2 (2004-2 I.R.B. 269), Q & A-32.
Explanation of Provisions
Overview
The proposed regulations clarify and expand on the guidance
regarding the comparability rules published in Notice 2004-2 and in
Notice 2004-50 (2004-33 I.R.B. 196), Q & A-46 through Q & A-54.
I. Comparable Contributions in General
An employer is not required to contribute to the HSAs of its
employees. However, in general, if an employer makes contributions to
any employee's HSA, the employer must make comparable contributions to
the HSAs of all comparable participating employees. Comparable
participating employees are eligible individuals (as defined in section
223(c)(1)) who have the same category of high deductible health plan
(HDHP) coverage. The categories of coverage are self-only HDHP coverage
and family HDHP coverage.
These proposed regulations incorporate the rule in Notice 2004-2, Q
& A-32 that contributions are comparable if they are either the same
amount or the same percentage of the deductible for employees who are
eligible individuals with the same category of coverage. An employer is
not required to contribute the same amount or the same percentage of
the deductible for employees who are eligible individuals with self-
only HDHP coverage that it contributes for employees who are eligible
individuals with family HDHP coverage. An employer that satisfies the
comparability rules by contributing the same amount to the HSAs of all
employees who are eligible individuals with self-only HDHP coverage is
not required to contribute any amount to the HSAs of employees who are
eligible individuals with family HDHP coverage, or to contribute the
same percentage of the family HDHP deductible as the amount contributed
with respect to self-only HDHP coverage. Similarly, an employer that
satisfies the comparability rules by contributing the same amount to
the HSAs of all employees who are eligible individuals with family HDHP
coverage is not required to contribute any amount to the HSAs of
employees who are eligible individuals with self-only HDHP coverage, or
to contribute the same percentage of the self-only HDHP deductible as
the amount contributed with respect to family HDHP coverage.
II. Calculating Comparable Contributions
The proposed regulations clarify that contributions to the HSAs of
certain individuals are not taken into account in determining whether
an employer's contributions to the HSAs of its employees satisfy the
comparability rules. Specifically, contributions to the HSAs of
independent contractors, sole proprietors, and partners in a
partnership are not taken into account under the comparability rules.
In addition, the comparability rules do not apply to amounts rolled
over from an employee's HSA or Archer MSA or to after-tax employee
contributions.
The proposed regulations also clarify that the categories of
employees for comparability testing are current full-time employees,
current part-time employees, and former employees (except for former
employees with coverage under the employer's HDHP because of an
election under a COBRA continuation provision (as defined in section
9832(d)(1)). The proposed regulations provide that the comparability
rules apply separately to each of the categories of employees. If an
employer contributes to the HSA of any employee in a category of
employees, the employer must make comparable contributions to the HSAs
of all comparable participating employees within that category.
Therefore, the comparability rules apply to a category of employees
only if an employer contributes to the HSA of any employee within the
category. For example, an employer that makes comparable contributions
to the HSAs of all full-time employees who are eligible individuals but
does not contribute to the HSA of any employee who is not a full-time
employee, satisfies the comparability rules.
The categories of employees set forth in these proposed regulations
are the exclusive categories for comparability testing. An employer
must make comparable contributions to the HSAs of all comparable
participating employees (eligible individuals who are in the same
category of employees with the same category of HDHP coverage) during
the calendar year without regard to any classification other than these
categories. Therefore, the comparability rules do not apply separately
to groups of collectively bargained employees. While the comparability
rules apply separately to part-time employees, there is no similar rule
permitting separate application of the comparability rules to
collectively bargained employees. Neither section 4980E nor section
4980G provides an exception to the comparability rules for collectively
bargained employees. Accordingly, an employer must make comparable
contributions to the HSAs of all comparable participating employees,
both those who are covered under a collective bargaining agreement and
those who are not covered. Similarly, the comparability rules do not
apply separately to management and non-management employees.
The proposed regulations also provide that the comparability rules
apply separately to employees who have HSAs and employees who have
Archer MSAs. However, if an employee has both an HSA and an Archer MSA,
the employer may contribute to either the HSA or the Archer MSA, but
not to both.
[[Page 50235]]
The proposed regulations incorporate the rule set forth in Q & A-53
of Notice 2004-50, which provides that if an employer limits HSA
contributions to employees who are eligible individuals with coverage
under an HDHP provided by the employer, the employer is not required to
make comparable contributions to the HSAs of employees who are eligible
individuals with coverage under an HDHP not provided by the employer.
However, if an employer contributes to the HSAs of employees who are
eligible individuals with coverage under any HDHP, in addition to the
HDHPs provided by the employer, the employer is required to make
comparable contributions to the HSAs of all comparable participating
employees whether or not covered under employer's HDHP. The proposed
regulations also provide that similar rules apply to employer
contributions to the HSAs of former employees. For example, if an
employer limits HSA contributions to former employees who are eligible
individuals with coverage under an HDHP provided by the employer, the
employer is not required make comparable contributions to the HSAs of
former employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under an
HDHP not provided by the employer. However, if an employer contributes
to the HSAs of former employees who are eligible individuals with
coverage under the employer's HDHP, the employer is not required to
make comparable contributions to the HSAs of former employees who are
eligible individuals with coverage under the employer's HDHP because of
an election under a COBRA continuation provision (as defined in section
9832(d)(1)).
The proposed regulations also incorporate the rule set forth in Q &
A-46 of Notice 2004-50, which provides that the comparability rules
will not be satisfied if an employer makes HSA contributions in an
amount equal to an employee's HSA contribution or a percentage of the
employee's HSA contribution (matching contributions) because if all
comparable participating employees do not contribute the same amount to
their HSAs, they will not receive comparable contributions to their
HSAs. In addition, the comparability rules will not be satisfied if an
employer conditions contributions to an employee's HSA on an employee's
participation in health assessments, disease management programs or
wellness programs because if all comparable participating employees do
not elect to participate in all the programs, they will not receive
comparable contributions to their HSAs. See Q & A-48 of Notice 2004-50.
Similarly, the comparability rules will not be satisfied if an employer
makes additional contributions to the HSAs of all comparable
participating employees who have attained a specified age or who have
worked for the employer for a specified number of years, because if all
comparable participating employees do not meet the age or length of
service requirement, they will not receive comparable contributions to
their HSAs. See Q & A-50 of Notice 2004-50.
III. Procedures for Making Comparable Contributions
The proposed regulations provide that in determining whether the
comparability rules are satisfied, an employer must take into account
all full-time and part-time employees who were eligible individuals for
any month during the calendar year. An employee is an eligible
individual if as of the first day of the month the employee meets all
of the requirements set forth in section 223(c). An employer may comply
with the comparability rules by contributing amounts at one or more
times for the calendar year to the HSAs of employees who are eligible
individuals, if contributions are the same amount or the same
percentage of the HDHP deductible for employees who are eligible
individuals with the same category of coverage and are made at the same
time (contributions on a pay-as-you-go basis).
An employer may also satisfy the comparability rules by determining
comparable contributions for the calendar year at the end of the
calendar year, taking into account all employees who were eligible
individuals for any month during the calendar year and contributing the
correct amount (a percentage of the HDHP deductible or a specified
dollar amount for the same categories of coverage) to the employees'
HSAs by April 15th of the following year (contributions on a look-back
basis).
If an employer makes comparable HSA contributions on a pay-as-you-
go basis, it must do so for each comparable participating employee who
is an employee during the time period used to make contributions. For
example, if an employer makes HSA contributions each pay period, it
must do so for each comparable participating employee who is an
employee during the pay period. If an employer makes comparable
contributions on a look-back-basis, it must do so for each employee who
was a comparable participating employee for any month during the
calendar year.
In addition, an employer may make all of its contributions to the
HSAs of employees who are eligible individuals at the beginning of the
calendar year (contributions on a pre-funded basis). An employer that
makes comparable HSA contributions on a pre-funded basis will not fail
to satisfy the comparability rules because an employee who terminates
employment prior to the end of the calendar year has received more HSA
contributions on a monthly basis than employees who worked the entire
calendar year. If an employer makes HSA contributions on a pre-funded
basis, it must do so for all employees who are comparable participating
employees at the beginning of the calendar year. An employer that makes
HSA contributions on a pre-funded basis must make comparable HSA
contributions for all employees who are comparable participating
employees for any month during the calendar year, including employees
hired after the date of initial funding.
If an employee has not established an HSA at the time the employer
funds its employee's HSAs, the employer complies with the comparability
rules by contributing comparable amounts to the employee's HSA when the
employee establishes the HSA, taking into account each month that the
employee was a comparable participating employee. However, an employer
is not required to make comparable contributions for a calendar year to
an employee's HSA if the employee has not established an HSA by
December 31st of the calendar year.
The proposed regulations provide that if an employer determines
that the comparability rules are not satisfied for a calendar year, the
employer may not recoup from an employee's HSA any portion of the
employer's contribution to the employee's HSA because under section
223(d)(1)(E), an account beneficiary's interest in an HSA is
nonforfeitable. However, an employer may make additional HSA
contributions to satisfy the comparability rules. An employer may
contribute up until April 15th following the calendar year in which the
non-comparable contributions were made. An employer that makes
additional HSA contributions to correct non-comparable contributions
must also contribute reasonable interest.
IV. Exception to the Comparability Rules for Cafeteria Plans
The legislative history of the Act states that the comparability
rules do not apply to HSA contributions that an employer makes through
a cafeteria plan. See Conf. Rep. No. 391, 108th Cong., 1st Sess. 843
(2003), 2004
[[Page 50236]]
U.S.C.C.A.N. 1808. See also Notice 2004-2, Q & A-32. The
nondiscrimination rules in section 125 of the Code apply to HSA
contributions (including matching contributions) made through a
cafeteria plan. Generally, a cafeteria plan is a written plan under
which all participants are employees and participants may choose among
two or more benefits consisting of cash and qualified benefits. Unlike
the cafeteria plan nondiscrimination rules, the comparability rules are
not based upon discrimination in favor of highly compensated or key
employees. Therefore, an employer that maintains an HDHP only for
highly compensated or key employees and makes HSA contributions through
a cafeteria plan only for those eligible employees, does not violate
the comparability rules, but may violate the cafeteria plan
nondiscrimination rules.
V. Waiver of Excise Tax
In the case of a failure which is due to reasonable cause and not
to willful neglect, all or a portion of the excise tax imposed under
section 4980G may be waived to the extent that the payment of the tax
would be excessive relative to the failure involved. See sections
4980G(b) and 4980E(c).
Proposed Effective Date
It is proposed that these regulations apply to employer
contributions made on or after the date the final regulations are
published in the Federal Register. However, taxpayers may rely on these
regulations for guidance pending the issuance of final regulations.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has
been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations. This notice
of proposed rulemaking does not impose a collection of information on
small entities, thus the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter
6) does not apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, these
proposed regulations will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact
on small business.
Comments and Requests for Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written comments (a signed original
and eight (8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely
to the IRS. The Treasury Department and the IRS specifically request
comments on the clarity of the proposed rules and how they can be made
easier to understand. In addition, comments are requested on the
application of the comparability rules to employees who are on leave
pursuant to the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, Public Law 103-3,
(107 Stat. 6, 1993, 29 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.). Comments are also
requested concerning employer matching HSA contributions made through a
cafeteria plan. Specifically, whether the ratio of an employer's
matching HSA contributions to an employee's salary reduction HSA
contributions should be limited, and whether employer matching
contributions exceeding a specific limit should be subject to the
section 4980G comparability rules. All comments will be available for
public inspection and copying. A public hearing will be scheduled if
requested in writing by any person that timely submits written
comments.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these proposed regulations is Barbara E.
Pie, Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and
Government Entities), Internal Revenue Service. However, personnel from
other offices of the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their
development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 54
Excise taxes, Pensions, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendment to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 54 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 54--PENSION EXCISE TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 54 is amended by
adding an entry in numerical order to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 54.4980G-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 4980G. * * *
Par. 2. Sections 54.4980G-0 through 54.4980G-5 are added to read as
follows:
Sec. 54.4980G-0 Table of contents.
This section contains the questions for Sec. 54.4980G-1 through
Sec. 54.4980G-5.
Sec. 54.4980G-1 Failure of employer to make comparable health
savings account contributions.
Q-1. What are the comparability rules that apply to employer
contributions to Health Savings Accounts (HSAs)?
Q-2. What are the categories of HDHP coverage for purposes of
applying the comparability rules?
Q-3. What is the testing period for making comparable
contributions to employees' HSAs?
Q-4. How is the excise tax computed if employer contributions do
not satisfy the comparability rules for a calendar year?
Sec. 54.4980G-2 Employer contribution defined.
Q-1. Do the comparability rules apply to amounts rolled over
from an employee's HSA or Archer Medical Savings Account (Archer
MSA)?
Q-2. If an employee requests that his or her employer deduct
after-tax amounts from the employee's compensation and forward these
amounts as employee contributions to the employee's HSA, do the
comparability rules apply to these amounts?
Sec. 54.4980G-3 Definition of employee for comparability testing.
Q-1. Do the comparability rules apply to contributions that an
employer makes to the HSAs of independent contractors?
Q-2. May a sole proprietor who is an eligible individual
contribute to his or her own HSA without contributing to the HSAs of
his or her employees who are eligible individuals?
Q-3. Do the comparability rules apply to contributions by a
partnership to a partner's HSA?
Q-4. How are members of controlled groups treated when applying
the comparability rules?
Q-5. What are the categories of employees for comparability
testing?
Q-6. Is an employer permitted to make comparable contributions
only to the HSAs of comparable participating employees who have
coverage under the employer's HDHP?
Q-7. If an employee and his or her spouse are eligible
individuals who work for the same employer and one employee-spouse
has family coverage for both employees under the employer's HDHP,
must the employer make comparable contributions to the HSAs of both
employees?
Q-8. Does an employer that makes HSA contributions only for non-
management employees who are eligible individuals, but not for
management employees who are eligible individuals or that makes HSA
contributions only for management employees who are eligible
individuals but not for non-management employees who are eligible
individuals satisfy the requirement that the employer make
comparable contributions?
Q-9. If an employer contributes to the HSAs of former employees
who are eligible individuals, do the comparability rules apply to
these contributions?
Q-10. Is an employer permitted to make comparable contributions
only to the HSAs of comparable participating former employees who
have coverage under the employer's HDHP?
Q-11. If an employer contributes only to the HSAs of former
employees who are
[[Page 50237]]
eligible individuals with coverage under the employer's HDHP, must
the employer make comparable contributions to the HSAs of former
employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under the
employer's HDHP because of an election under a COBRA continuation
provision (as defined in section 9832(d)(1))?
Q-12. How do the comparability rules apply if some employees
have HSAs and other employees have Archer MSAs?
Sec. 54.4980G-4 Calculating comparable contributions.
Q-1. What are comparable contributions?
Q-2. How do the comparability rules apply to employer
contributions to employees' HSAs if some employees work full-time
during the entire calendar year, and other employees work full-time
for less than the entire calendar year?
Q-3. How does an employer comply with the comparability rules
when some employees who are eligible individuals do not work for the
employer during the entire calendar year?
Q-4. May an employer make all of its contributions to the HSAs
of its employees who are eligible individuals at the beginning of
the calendar year (i.e., on a pre-funded basis) instead of
contributing on a pay-as-you-go or on a look-back basis?
Q-5. Must an employer use the same contribution method as
described in Q & A-3 and Q & A-4 of this section for all employees
who were comparable participating employees for any month during the
calendar year?
Q-6. How does an employer comply with the comparability rules if
an employee has not established an HSA at the time the employer
contributes to its employees' HSAs?
Q-7. If an employer bases its contributions on a percentage of
the HDHP deductible, how is the correct percentage or dollar amount
computed?
Q-8. Does an employer that contributes to the HSA of each
comparable participating employee in an amount equal to the
employee's HSA contribution or a percentage of the employee's HSA
contribution (matching contributions) satisfy the rule that all
comparable participating employees receive comparable contributions?
Q-9. If an employer conditions contributions by the employer to
an employee's HSA on an employee's participation in health
assessments, disease management programs or wellness programs and
makes the same contributions available to all employees who
participate in the programs, do the contributions satisfy the
comparability rules?
Q-10. If an employer makes additional contributions to the HSAs
of all comparable participating employees who have attained a
specified age or who have worked for the employer for a specified
number of years, do the contributions satisfy the comparability
rules?
Q-11. If an employer makes additional contributions to the HSAs
of all comparable participating employees who qualify for the
additional contributions (HSA catch-up contributions) under section
223(b)(3), do the contributions satisfy the comparability rules?
Q-12. If an employer's contributions to an employee's HSA result
in non-comparable contributions, may the employer recoup the excess
amount from the employee's HSA?
Sec. 54.4980G-5 HSA comparability rules and cafeteria plans and
waiver of excise tax.
Q-1. If an employer makes contributions through a section 125
cafeteria plan to the HSA of each employee who is an eligible
individual are the contributions subject to the comparability rules?
Q-2. If an employer makes contributions through a cafeteria plan
to the HSA of each employee who is an eligible individual in an
amount equal to the amount of the employee's HSA contribution or a
percentage of the amount of the employee's HSA contribution (i.e.,
matching contributions), are the contributions subject to the
section 4980G comparability rules?
Q-3. If an employer provides HDHP coverage through a cafeteria
plan, but the employer's HSA contributions are not provided through
the cafeteria plan, do the cafeteria plan nondiscrimination rules or
the comparability rules apply to the HSA contributions?
Q-4. If under the employer's cafeteria plan, employees who are
eligible individuals and who participate in health assessments,
disease management programs or wellness programs receive an employer
contribution to an HSA, unless the employees elect cash, are the
contributions subject to the comparability rules?
Q-5. May all or part of the excise tax imposed under section
4980G be waived?
Sec. 54.4980G-1 Failure of employer to make comparable health savings
account contributions.
Q-1. What are the comparability rules that apply to employer
contributions to Health Savings Accounts (HSAs)?
A-1. If an employer makes contributions to any employee's HSA, the
employer must make comparable contributions to the HSAs of all
comparable participating employees. See Q & A-1 in Sec. 54.4980G-4 for
the definition of comparable contributions. Comparable participating
employees are eligible individuals (as defined in section 223(c)(1))
who have the same category of high deductible health plan (HDHP)
coverage. See sections 4980G(b) and 4980E(d)(3). See section 223(c)(2)
and (g) for the definition of an HDHP. See also Q & A-5 in Sec.
54.4980G-3 for the categories of employees and Q & A-2 in this section
for the categories of HDHP coverage.
Q-2. What are the categories of HDHP coverage for purposes of
applying the comparability rules?
A-2. The categories of coverage are self-only HDHP coverage and
family HDHP coverage. See sections 4980G(b) and 4980E(d)(3)(B).
Q-3. What is the testing period for making comparable contributions
to employees' HSAs?
A-3. To satisfy the comparability rules, an employer must make
comparable contributions for the calendar year to the HSAs of employees
who are comparable participating employees. See section 4980G(a).
Q-4. How is the excise tax computed if employer contributions do
not satisfy the comparability rules for a calendar year?
A-4. (a) Computation of tax. If employer contributions do not
satisfy the comparability rules for a calendar year, the employer is
subject to an excise tax equal to 35% of the aggregate amount
contributed by the employer to HSAs for that period.
(b) Example. The following example illustrates the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-4:
Example. In this Example, assume that the HDHP provided by
Employer A satisfies the definition of an HDHP for the 2007 calendar
year. During the 2007 calendar year, Employer A has 8 employees who
are eligible individuals with self-only coverage under an HDHP
provided by Employer A. The deductible for the HDHP is $2,000. For
the 2007 calendar year, Employer A contributes $2,000 each to the
HSAs of two employees and $1,000 each to the HSAs of the other six
employees, for total HSA contributions of $10,000. Employer A's
contributions do not satisfy the comparability rules. Therefore,
Employer A is subject to an excise tax of $3,500 (i.e., 35% x
$10,000) for its failure to make comparable contributions to its
employees' HSAs.
Sec. 54.4980G-2 Employer contribution defined.
Q-1. Do the comparability rules apply to amounts rolled over from
an employee's HSA or Archer Medical Savings Account (Archer MSA)?
A-1. No. The comparability rules do not apply to amounts rolled
over from an employee's HSA or Archer MSA.
Q-2. If an employee requests that his or her employer deduct after-
tax amounts from the employee's compensation and forward these amounts
as employee contributions to the employee's HSA, do the comparability
rules apply to these amounts?
A-2. No. Section 106(d) provides that amounts contributed by an
employer to an eligible employee's HSA shall be treated as employer-
provided coverage for medical expenses and are excludible from the
employee's gross income up to the limit in section 223(b). After-tax
employee contributions to an HSA are not subject to the comparability
rules because they are not employer contributions under section 106(d).
[[Page 50238]]
Sec. 54.4980G-3 Definition of employee for comparability testing.
Q-1. Do the comparability rules apply to contributions that an
employer makes to the HSAs of independent contractors?
A-1. No. The comparability rules apply only to contributions that
an employer makes to the HSAs of employees.
Q-2. May a sole proprietor who is an eligible individual contribute
to his or her own HSA without contributing to the HSAs of his or her
employees who are eligible individuals?
A-2. (a) Sole proprietor not an employee. Yes. The comparability
rules apply only to contributions made by an employer to the HSAs of
employees. Because a sole proprietor is not an employee, the
comparability rules do not apply to contributions he or she makes to
his or her own HSA. However, if a sole proprietor contributes to any
employee's HSA, he or she must make comparable contributions to the
HSAs of all comparable participating employees. In determining whether
the comparability rules are satisfied, contributions that a sole
proprietor makes to his or her own HSA are not taken into account.
(b) Example. The following example illustrates the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-2:
Example. In a calendar year, B, a sole proprietor is an eligible
individual and contributes $1,000 to B's own HSA. B also contributes
$500 for the same calendar year to the HSA of each employee who is
an eligible individual. The comparability rules are not violated by
B's $1,000 contribution to B's own HSA.
Q-3. Do the comparability rules apply to contributions by a
partnership to a partner's HSA?
A-3. (a) Partner not an employee. No. Contributions by a
partnership to a bona fide partner's HSA are not subject to the
comparability rules because the contributions are not contributions by
an employer to the HSA of an employee. The contributions are treated as
either guaranteed payments under section 707(c) or distributions under
section 731. However, if a partnership contributes to the HSAs of
employees who are not partners, the comparability rules apply to those
contributions.
(b) Example. The following example illustrates the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-3:
Example. (i) Partnership X is a limited partnership with three
equal individual partners, A (a general partner), B (a limited
partner), and C (a limited partner). C is to be paid $300 annually
for services rendered to Partnership X in her capacity as a partner
without regard to partnership income (a section 707(c)) guaranteed
payment). D and E are the only employees of Partnership X and are
not partners in Partnership X. A, B, C, D, and E are eligible
individuals and each has an HSA. During Partnership X's Year 1
taxable year, which is also a calendar year, Partnership X makes the
following contributions--
(A) A $300 contribution to each of A's and B's HSAs which are
treated as section 731 distributions to A and B;
(B) A $300 contribution to C's HSA in lieu of paying C the
guaranteed payment directly; and
(C) A $200 contribution to each of D's and E's HSAs, who are
comparable participating employees.
(ii) Partnership X's contributions to A's and B's HSAs are
section 731 distributions, which are treated as cash distributions.
Partnership X's contribution to C's HSA is treated as a guaranteed
payment under section 707(c). The contribution is not excludible
from C's gross income under section 106(d) because the contribution
is treated as a distributive share of partnership income for
purposes of all Code sections other than sections 61(a) and 162(a),
and a guaranteed payment to a partner is not treated as compensation
to an employee. Thus, Partnership X's contributions to the HSAs of
A, B, and C are not subject to the comparability rules. Partnership
X's contributions to D's and E's HSAs are subject to the
comparability rules because D and E are employees of Partnership X
and are not partners in Partnership X. Partnership X's contributions
satisfy the comparability rules.
Q-4. How are members of controlled groups treated when applying the
comparability rules?
A-4. All persons or entities treated as a single employer under
section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o) are treated as one employer. See
sections 4980G(b) and 4980E(e).
Q-5. What are the categories of employees for comparability
testing?
A-5. (a) Categories. The categories of employees for comparability
testing are as follows--
(1) Current full-time employees;
(2) Current part-time employees; and
(3) Former employees (except for former employees with coverage
under the employer's HDHP because of an election under a COBRA
continuation provision (as defined in section 9832(d)(1)).
(b) Part-time and full-time employees. Part-time employees are
customarily employed for fewer than 30 hours per week and full-time
employees are customarily employed for 30 or more hours per week. See
sections 4980G(b) and 4980E(d)(4)(A) and (B).
(c) In general. The categories of employees in paragraph (a) of
this Q & A-5 are the exclusive categories for comparability testing. An
employer must make comparable contributions to the HSAs of all
comparable participating employees (eligible individuals who are in the
same category of employees with the same category of HDHP coverage)
during the calendar year without regard to any classification other
than these categories. Thus, the comparability rules do not apply
separately to collectively bargained and non-collectively bargained
employees. Similarly, the comparability rules do not apply separately
to groups of collectively bargained employees.
Q-6. Is an employer permitted to make comparable contributions only
to the HSAs of comparable participating employees who have coverage
under the employer's HDHP?
A-6. (a) Employer-provided HDHP coverage. If during a calendar
year, an employer contributes to the HSA of any employee who is an
eligible individual covered under an HDHP provided by the employer, the
employer is required to make comparable contributions to the HSAs of
all comparable participating employees with coverage under any HDHP
provided by the employer. An employer that contributes only to the HSAs
of employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under the
employer's HDHP is not required to make comparable contributions to
HSAs of employees who are eligible individuals but are not covered
under the employer's HDHP. However, an employer that contributes to the
HSA of any employee who is an eligible individual with coverage under
any HDHP, in addition to the HDHPs provided by the employer, must make
comparable contributions to the HSAs of all comparable participating
employees whether or not covered under the employer's HDHP.
(b) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-6:
Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer C offers an HDHP to its
full-time employees. Most full-time employees are covered under
Employer C's HDHP and Employer C makes comparable contributions only
to these employees' HSAs. Employee W, a full-time employee of
Employer C and an eligible individual, is covered under an HDHP
provided by W's spouse's employer and not under Employer C's HDHP.
Employer C is not required to make comparable contributions to W's
HSA.
Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer D does not offer an
HDHP. Several full-time employees, who are eligible individuals,
have HSAs. Employer D contributes to these employees' HSAs. Employer
D must make comparable contributions to the HSAs of all full-time
employees who are eligible individuals.
Example 3. In a calendar year, Employer E offers an HDHP to its
full-time employees. Most full-time employees are covered under
Employer E's HDHP and Employer E makes
[[Page 50239]]
comparable contributions to these employees' HSAs and also to the
HSAs of full-time employees who are eligible individuals and who are
not covered under Employer E's HDHP. Employee H, a full-time
employee of Employer E and a comparable participating employee, is
covered under an HDHP provided by H's spouse's employer and not
under Employer E's HDHP. Employer E must make comparable
contributions to H's HSA.
Q-7. If an employee and his or her spouse are eligible individuals
who work for the same employer and one employee-spouse has family
coverage for both employees under the employer's HDHP, must the
employer make comparable contributions to the HSAs of both employees?
A-7. (a) In general. If the employer makes contributions only to
the HSAs of employees who are eligible individuals covered under its
HDHP, the employer is not required to contribute to the HSAs of both
employee-spouses. The employer is required to contribute to the HSA of
the employee-spouse with coverage under the employer's HDHP, but is not
required to contribute to the HSA of the employee-spouse covered under
the employer's HDHP by virtue of his or her spouse's coverage. However,
if the employer contributes to the HSA of any employee who is an
eligible individual with coverage under any HDHP, the employer must
make comparable contributions to the HSAs of both employee-spouses if
they are both eligible individuals. If an employer is required to
contribute to the HSAs of both employee-spouses, the employer is not
required to contribute amounts in excess of the annual contribution
limits in section 223(b).
(b) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-7:
Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer F offers an HDHP to its
full-time employees. Most full-time employees are covered under
Employer F's HDHP and Employer F makes comparable contributions only
to these employees' HSAs. Employee H, a full-time employee of
Employer F and an eligible individual has family coverage under
Employer F's HDHP for H and H's spouse, Employee W, who is also a
full-time employee of Employer F and an eligible individual.
Employer F is required to make comparable contributions to H's HSA,
but is not required to make comparable contributions to W's HSA.
Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer G offers an HDHP to its
full-time employees. Most full-time employees are covered under
Employer G's HDHP and Employer G makes comparable contributions to
these employees' HSAs and to the HSAs of full-time employees who are
eligible individuals but are not covered under Employer G's HDHP.
Employee W, a full-time employee of Employer G and an eligible
individual, has family coverage under Employer G's HDHP for W and
W's spouse, Employee H, who is also a full-time employee of Employer
G and an eligible individual. Employer G must make comparable
contributions to W's HSA and to H's HSA.
Q-8. Does an employer that makes HSA contributions only for non-
management employees who are eligible individuals, but not for
management employees who are eligible individuals or that makes HSA
contributions only for management employees who are eligible
individuals but not for non-management employees who are eligible
individuals satisfy the requirement that the employer make comparable
contributions?
A-8. (a) Management v. non-management. No. If management employees
and non-management employees are comparable participating employees,
the comparability rules are not satisfied. However, if non-management
employees are comparable participating employees and management
employees are not comparable participating employees, the comparability
rules may be satisfied. But see Q & A-1 in Sec. 54.4980G-5 on
contributions made through a cafeteria plan.
(b) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-8:
Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer H maintains an HDHP
covering all management and non-management employees. Employer H
contributes $1,000 for the calendar year to the HSA of each non-
management employee who is an eligible individual covered under its
HDHP. Employer H does not contribute to the HSAs of any of its
management employees who are eligible individuals covered under its
HDHP. The comparability rules are not satisfied.
Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer J maintains an HDHP for
non-management employees only. Employer J does not maintain an HDHP
for its management employees. Employer J contributes $1,000 for the
calendar year to the HSA of each non-management employee who is an
eligible individual with coverage under its HDHP. Employer J does
not contribute to the HSAs of any of its non-management employees
not covered under its HDHP or to the HSAs of any of its management
employees. The comparability rules are satisfied.
Example 3. In a calendar year, Employer K maintains an HDHP for
management employees only. Employer K does not maintain an HDHP for
its non-management employees. Employer K contributes $1,000 for the
calendar year to the HSA of each management employee who is an
eligible individual with coverage under its HDHP. Employer K does
not contribute to the HSAs of any of its management employees not
covered under its HDHP or to the HSAs of any of its non-management
employees. The comparability rules are satisfied.
Q-9. If an employer contributes to the HSAs of former employees who
are eligible individuals, do the comparability rules apply to these
contributions?
A-9. (a) Former employees. Yes. The comparability rules apply to
contributions an employer makes to former employees' HSAs. Therefore,
if an employer contributes to any former employee's HSA, it must make
comparable contributions to the HSAs of all comparable participating
former employees (former employees who are eligible individuals with
the same category of HDHP coverage). However, an employer is not
required to make comparable contributions to the HSAs of former
employees with coverage under the employer's HDHP because of an
election under a COBRA continuation provision (as defined in section
9832(d)(1)). See Q & A-5 and Q & A-11 in this section. The
comparability rules apply separately to former employees because they
are a separate category of covered employee. See Q & A-5 in this
section.
(b) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-9:
Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer L contributes $1,000 for
the calendar year to the HSA of each current employee who is an
eligible individual with coverage under any HDHP. Employer L does
not contribute to the HSA of any former employee who is an eligible
individual. Employer L's contributions satisfy the comparability
rules.
Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer M contributes to the
HSAs of current employees and former employees who are eligible
individuals covered under any HDHP. Employer M contributes $750 to
the HSA of each current employee with self-only HDHP coverage and
$1,000 to the HSA of each current employee with family HDHP
coverage. Employer M also contributes $300 to the HSA of each former
employee with self-only HDHP coverage and $400 to the HSA of each
former employee with family HDHP coverage. Employer M's
contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
Q-10. Is an employer permitted to make comparable contributions
only to the HSAs of comparable participating former employees who have
coverage under the employer's HDHP?
A-10. If during a calendar year, an employer contributes to the HSA
of any former employee who is an eligible individual covered under an
HDHP provided by the employer, the employer is required to make
comparable contributions to the HSAs of all former employees who are
comparable participating former employees with coverage under any HDHP
provided by the employer. An employer that contributes only to the HSAs
of former
[[Page 50240]]
employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under the
employer's HDHP is not required to make comparable contributions to the
HSAs of former employees who are eligible individuals and who are not
covered under the employer's HDHP. However, an employer that
contributes to the HSA of any former employee who is an eligible
individual with coverage under any HDHP, even if that coverage is not
the employer's HDHP, must make comparable contributions to the HSAs of
all former employees who are eligible individuals whether or not
covered under an HDHP of the employer.
Q-11. If an employer contributes only to the HSAs of former
employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under the
employer's HDHP, must the employer make comparable contributions to the
HSAs of former employees who are eligible individuals with coverage
under the employer's HDHP because of an election under a COBRA
continuation provision (as defined in section 9832(d)(1))?
A-11. No. An employer that contributes only to the HSAs of former
employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under the
employer's HDHP is not required to make comparable contributions to the
HSAs of former employees who are eligible individuals with coverage
under the employer's HDHP because of an election under a COBRA
continuation provision (as defined in section 9832(d)(1)).
Q-12. How do the comparability rules apply if some employees have
HSAs and other employees have Archer MSAs?
A-12. (a) HSAs and Archer MSAs. The comparability rules apply
separately to employees who have HSAs and employees who have Archer
MSAs. However, if an employee has both an HSA and an Archer MSA, the
employer may contribute to either the HSA or the Archer MSA, but not to
both.
(b) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-12:
Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer N contributes $600 to
the Archer MSA of each employee who is an eligible individual and
who has an Archer MSA. Employer N contributes $500 for the calendar
year to the HSA of each employee who is an eligible individual and
who has an HSA. If an employee has both an Archer MSA and an HSA,
Employer N contributes to the employee's Archer MSA and not to the
employee's HSA. Employee X has an Archer MSA and an HSA. Employer N
contributes $600 for the calendar year to X's Archer MSA but does
not contribute to X's HSA. Employer N's contributions satisfy the
comparability rules.
Example 2. Same facts as Example 1, except that if an employee
has both an Archer MSA and an HSA, Employer N contributes to the
employee's HSA and not to the employee's Archer MSA. Employer N
contributes $500 for the calendar year to X's HSA but does not
contribute to X's Archer MSA. Employer N's contributions satisfy the
comparability rules.
Sec. 54.4980G-4 Calculating comparable contributions.
Q-1. What are comparable contributions?
A-1. (a) Definition. Contributions are comparable if they are
either the same amount or the same percentage of the deductible under
the HDHP for employees who are eligible individuals with the same
category of coverage. Employees with self-only HDHP coverage are tested
separately from employees with family HDHP coverage. See Q & A-1 and Q
& A-2 in Sec. 54.4980G-1. An employer is not required to contribute
the same amount or the same percentage of the deductible for employees
who are eligible individuals with self-only HDHP coverage that it
contributes for employees who are eligible individuals with family HDHP
coverage. An employer that satisfies the comparability rules by
contributing the same amount to the HSAs of all employees who are
eligible individuals with self-only HDHP coverage is not required to
contribute any amount to the HSAs of employees who are eligible
individuals with family HDHP coverage, or to contribute the same
percentage of the family HDHP deductible as the amount contributed with
respect to self-only HDHP coverage. Similarly, an employer that
satisfies the comparability rules by contributing the same amount to
the HSAs of all employees who are eligible individuals with family HDHP
coverage is not required to contribute any amount to the HSAs of
employees who are eligible individuals with self-only HDHP coverage, or
to contribute the same percentage of the self-only HDHP deductible as
the amount contributed with respect to family HDHP coverage.
(b) Examples. Assume that the HDHPs in Example 1 through Example 7
satisfy the definition of an HDHP for the 2007 calendar year. The
following examples illustrate the rules in paragraph (a) of this Q & A-
1:
Example 1. In the 2007 calendar year, Employer A offers its
full-time employees three health plans, including an HDHP with self-
only coverage and a $2,000 deductible. Employer A contributes $1,000
for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee who is an eligible
individual electing the self-only HDHP coverage. Employer A makes no
HSA contributions for employees with family HDHP coverage or for
employees who do not elect the employer's self-only HDHP. Employer
A's HSA contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
Example 2. In the 2007 calendar year, Employer B offers its
employees an HDHP with a $3,000 deductible for self-only coverage
and a $4,000 deductible for family coverage. Employer B contributes
$1,000 for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee who is an
eligible individual electing the self-only HDHP coverage. Employer B
contributes $2,000 for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee
who is an eligible individual electing the family HDHP coverage.
Employer B's HSA contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
Example 3. In the 2007 calendar year, Employer C offers its
employees an HDHP with a $1,500 deductible for self-only coverage
and a $3,000 deductible for family coverage. Employer C contributes
$1,000 for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee who is an
eligible individual electing the self-only HDHP coverage. Employer C
contributes $1,000 for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee
who is an eligible individual electing the family HDHP coverage.
Employer C's HSA contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
Example 4. In the 2007 calendar year, Employer D offers its
employees an HDHP with a $1,500 deductible for self-only coverage
and a $3,000 deductible for family coverage. Employer D contributes
$1,500 for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee who is an
eligible individual electing the self-only HDHP coverage. Employer D
contributes $1,000 for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee
who is an eligible individual electing the family HDHP coverage.
Employer D's HSA contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
Example 5. (i) In the 2007 calendar year, Employer E maintains
two HDHPs. Plan A has a $2,000 deductible for self-only coverage and
a $4,000 deductible for family coverage. Plan B has a $2,500
deductible for self-only coverage and a $4,500 deductible for family
coverage. For the calendar year, Employer E makes contributions to
the HSA of each full-time employee who is an eligible individual
covered under Plan A of $600 for self-only coverage and $1,000 for
family coverage. Employer E satisfies the comparability rules, if it
makes either of the following contributions for the 2007 calendar
year to the HSA of each full-time employee who is an eligible
individual covered under Plan B--
(A) $600 for each full-time employee with self-only coverage and
$1,000 for each full-time employee with family coverage; or
(B) $750 for each employee with self-only coverage and $1,125
for each employee with family coverage (the same percentage of the
deductible Employer E contributes for full-time employees covered
under Plan A, 30% of the deductible for self-only coverage and 25%
of the deductible for family coverage).
(ii) Employer E also makes contributions to the HSA of each
part-time employee who is an eligible individual covered under Plan
A of $300 for self-only coverage and $500 for family coverage.
Employer E satisfies the
[[Page 50241]]
comparability rules, if it makes either of the following
contributions for the 2007 calendar year to the HSA of each part-
time employee who is an eligible individual covered under Plan B--
(A) $300 for each part-time employee with self-only coverage and
$500 for each part-time employee with family coverage; or
(B) $375 for each part-time employee with self-only coverage and
$563 for each part-time employee with family coverage (the same
percentage of the deductible Employer E contributes for part-time
employees covered under Plan A, 15% of the deductible for self-only
coverage and 12.5% of the deductible for family coverage).
Example 6. (i) In the 2007 calendar year, Employer F maintains
an HDHP. The HDHP has a $2,500 deductible for self-only coverage,
and the following family coverage options--
(A) A $3,500 deductible for self plus one dependent;
(B) A $3,500 deductible for self plus spouse;
(C) A $3,500 deductible for self plus two or more dependents;
(D) A $3,500 deductible for self plus spouse and one dependent;
and
(E) A $3,500 deductible for self plus spouse and two or more
dependents.
(ii) Employer F makes the following contributions for the
calendar year to the HSA of each full-time employee who is an
eligible individual covered under the HDHP--
(A) $750 for self-only coverage;
(B) $1,000 for self plus one dependent;
(C) $1,000 for self plus spouse;
(D) $1,000 for self plus two or more dependents;
(E) $1,000 for self plus spouse and one dependent; and
(F) $1,000 for self plus spouse and two or more dependents.
(iii) Employer F's HSA contributions satisfy the comparability
rules.
Example 7. (i) In the 2007 calendar year, Employer G maintains
an HDHP. The HDHP has a $1,800 deductible for self-only coverage and
the following family coverage options--
(A) A $3,500 deductible for self plus one dependent;
(B) A $3,800 deductible for self plus spouse;
(C) A $4,000 deductible for self plus two or more dependents;
(D) A $4,500 deductible for self plus spouse and one dependent;
and
(E) A $5,000 deductible for self plus spouse and two or more
dependents.
(ii) Employer G makes the following contributions for the
calendar year to the HSA of each full-time employee who is an
eligible individual covered under the HDHP--
(A) $360 for self-only coverage;
(B) $875 for self plus one dependent;
(C) $950 for self plus spouse;
(D) $1,000 for self plus two or more dependents;
(E) $1,125 for self plus spouse and one dependent; and
(F) $1,250 for self plus spouse and two or more dependents.
(iii) Employer G's HSA contributions satisfy the comparability
rules because Employer G has made contributions that are the same
percentage of the deductible for eligible employees with the same
category of coverage (20% of the deductible for eligible employees
with self-only coverage and 25% of the deductible for eligible
employees with family coverage). Employer G could also satisfy the
comparability rules by contributing the same dollar amount for each
category of coverage.
Example 8. In a calendar year, Employer H offers its employees
an HDHP and a health flexible spending arrangement (health FSA). The
health FSA reimburses employees for medical expenses as defined in
section 213(d). Some of Employer H's employees have coverage under
the HDHP and the health FSA. For the calendar year, Employer H
contributes $500 to the HSA of each of employee who is an eligible
individual, but does not contribute to the HSAs of employees who
have coverage under the health FSA or under a spouse's health FSA.
In addition, some of Employer H's employees have coverage under the
HDHP and are enrolled in Medicare. Employer H does not contribute to
the HSAs of employees who are enrolled in Medicare. The employees
who have coverage under the health FSA or under a spouse's health
FSA are not comparable participating employees because they are not
eligible individuals under section 223(c)(1). Similarly, the
employees who are enrolled in Medicare are not comparable
participating employees because they are not eligible individuals
under section 223(b)(7) and (c)(1). Therefore, employees who have
coverage under the health FSA or under a spouse's health FSA and
employees who are enrolled in Medicare are excluded from
comparability testing. See sections 4980G(b) and 4980E. Employer H's
contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
Q-2. How do the comparability rules apply to employer contributions
to employees' HSAs if some employees work full-time during the entire
calendar year, and other employees work full-time for less than the
entire calendar year?
A-2. Employer contributions to the HSAs of employees who work full-
time for less than twelve months satisfy the comparability rules if the
contribution amount is comparable when determined on a month-to-month
basis. For example, if the employer contributes $240 to the HSA of each
full-time employee who works the entire calendar year, the employer
must contribute $60 to the HSA of a full-time employee who works three
months of the calendar year. The rules set forth this Q & A-2 apply to
employer contributions made on a pay-as-you-go basis or on a look-back-
basis as described in Q & A-3 in this section. See sections 4980G(b)
and 4980E(d)(2)(B).
Q-3. How does an employer comply with the comparability rules when
some employees who are eligible individuals do not work for the
employer during the entire calendar year?
A-3. (a) In general. In determining whether the comparability rules
are satisfied, an employer must take into account all full-time and
part-time employees who were employees and eligible individuals for any
month during the calendar year. (Full-time and part-time employees are
tested separately. See Q & A-5 in Sec. 54.4980G-3.) There are two
methods to comply with the comparability rules when some employees who
are eligible individuals do not work for the employer during the entire
calendar year; contributions may be made on a pay-as-you-go basis or on
a look-back basis. See Q & A-9 through Q & A-11 in Sec. 54.4980G-3 for
the rules regarding comparable contributions to the HSAs of former
employees.
(b) Contributions on a pay-as-you-go basis. An employer may comply
with the comparability rules by contributing amounts at one or more
times for the calendar year to the HSAs of employees who are eligible
individuals, if contributions are the same amount or the same
percentage of the HDHP deductible for employees who are eligible
individuals as of the first day of the month with the same category of
coverage and are made at the same time. Contributions made at the
employer's usual payroll interval for different groups of employees are
considered to be made at the same time. For example, if salaried
employees are paid monthly and hourly employees are paid bi-weekly, an
employer may contribute to the HSAs of hourly employees on a bi-weekly
basis and to the HSAs of salaried employees on a monthly basis. An
employer may change the amount that it contributes to the HSAs of
employees at any point. However, the changed contribution amounts must
satisfy the comparability rules.
(c) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in
paragraph (b) of this Q & A-3:
Example 1. (i) Beginning on January 1st, Employer J contributes
$50 per month on the first day of each month to the HSA of each
employee who is an eligible individual. Employer J does not
contribute to the HSAs of former employees. In mid-March of the same
year, Employee X, an eligible individual, terminates employment
after Employer J has contributed $150 to X's HSA. After X terminates
employment, Employer J does not contribute additional amounts to X's
HSA. In mid-April of the same year, Employer J hires Employee Y, an
eligible individual, and contributes $50 to Y's HSA in May and $50
in June. Effective in July of the same year, Employer J stops
contributing to the HSAs of all employees and makes no contributions
to the HSA of any employee for the months of July through December.
In August, Employer J hires Employee Z, an eligible individual.
Employer J does not
[[Page 50242]]
contribute to Z's HSA. After Z is hired, Employer J does not hire
additional employees. As of the end of the calendar year, Employer J
has made the following HSA contributions to its employees' HSAs--
(A) Employer J contributed $150 to X's HSA;
(B) Employer J contributed $100 to Y's HSA;
(C) Employer J did not contribute to Z's HSA; and
(D) Employer J contributed $300 to the HSA of each employee who
was an eligible individual and employed by Employer from January
through June.
(ii) Employer J's contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer K offers its employees
an HDHP and contributes on a monthly pay-as-you go-basis to the HSAs
of employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under
Employer K's HDHP. In the calendar year, Employer K contributes $50
per month to the HSA of each of employee with self-only HDHP
coverage and $100 per month to the HSA of each employee with family
HDHP coverage. From January 1st through March 30th of the calendar
year, Em