Emamectin; Notice of Filing a Pesticide Petition to Establish a Tolerance for a Certain Pesticide Chemical in or on Food, 49607-49611 [05-16806]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 24, 2005 / Notices
or tops, 0.2 mg/kg; sunflower seed,
0.002 mg/kg; triticale, 0.002 mg/kg;
wheat 0.002 mg/kg.
The following maximum residue
levels (MRLs) have been established by
the Codex Alimentarius Commission
(CODEX) for fipronil residues on the
following animal commodities: cattle,
kidney 0.02 mg/kg; cattle liver 0.1 mg/
kg; cattle meat 0.05 mg/kg; eggs 0.02
mg/kg; poultry meat 0.01 mg/kg;
poultry, edible offal, 0.02 mg/kg.
[FR Doc. 05–16807 Filed 8–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[OPP–2005–0212; FRL–7728–3]
Emamectin; Notice of Filing a Pesticide
Petition to Establish a Tolerance for a
Certain Pesticide Chemical in or on
Food
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
initial filing of a pesticide petition
proposing the establishment of
regulations for residues of a certain
pesticide chemical in or on various food
commodities.
DATES: Comments, identified by docket
identification (ID) number OPP–2005–
0212, must be received on or before
September 23, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted electronically, by mail, or
through hand delivery/courier. Follow
the detailed instructions as provided in
Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Harris, Registration Division
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 308–9423; e-mail
address:harris.thomas@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code
111)
• Animal production (NAICS code
112)
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:23 Aug 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311)
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532)
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Copies of this
Document and Other Related
Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established an
official public docket for this action
under docket ID number OPP–2005–
0212. The official public docket consists
of the documents specifically referenced
in this action, any public comments
received, and other information related
to this action. Although, a part of the
official docket, the public docket does
not include Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
The official public docket is the
collection of materials that is available
for public viewing at the Public
Information and Records Integrity
Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall
#2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. This
docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The docket
telephone number is (703) 305–5805.
2. Electronic access. You may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA
Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/
to submit or view public comments,
access the index listing of the contents
of the official public docket, and to
access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically.
Although, not all docket materials may
be available electronically, you may still
access any of the publicly available
docket materials through the docket
facility identified in Unit I.B.1. Once in
the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in
the appropriate docket ID number.
Certain types of information will not
be placed in the EPA Dockets.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49607
Information claimed as CBI and other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute, which is not
included in the official public docket,
will not be available for public viewing
in EPA’s electronic public docket. EPA’s
policy is that copyrighted material will
not be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. To the extent feasible, publicly
available docket materials will be made
available in EPA’s electronic public
docket. When a document is selected
from the index list in EPA Dockets, the
system will identify whether the
document is available for viewing in
EPA’s electronic public docket.
Although, not all docket materials may
be available electronically, you may still
access any of the publicly available
docket materials through the docket
facility identified in Unit I.B. EPA
intends to work towards providing
electronic access to all of the publicly
available docket materials through
EPA’s electronic public docket.
For public commenters, it is
important to note that EPA’s policy is
that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or on paper,
will be made available for public
viewing in EPA’s electronic public
docket as EPA receives them and
without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. When EPA
identifies a comment containing
copyrighted material, EPA will provide
a reference to that material in the
version of the comment that is placed in
EPA’s electronic public docket. The
entire printed comment, including the
copyrighted material, will be available
in the public docket.
Public comments submitted on
computer disks that are mailed or
delivered to the docket will be
transferred to EPA’s electronic public
docket. Public comments that are
mailed or delivered to the docket will be
scanned and placed in EPA’s electronic
public docket. Where practical, physical
objects will be photographed, and the
photograph will be placed in EPA’s
electronic public docket along with a
brief description written by the docket
staff.
C. How and to Whom Do I Submit
Comments?
You may submit comments
electronically, by mail, or through hand
delivery/courier. To ensure proper
receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate
docket ID number in the subject line on
the first page of your comment. Please
ensure that your comments are
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
49608
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 24, 2005 / Notices
submitted within the specified comment
period. Comments received after the
close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to
consider these late comments. If you
wish to submit CBI or information that
is otherwise protected by statute, please
follow the instructions in Unit I.D. Do
not use EPA Dockets or e-mail to submit
CBI or information protected by statute.
1. Electronically. If you submit an
electronic comment as prescribed in this
unit, EPA recommends that you include
your name, mailing address, and an email address or other contact
information in the body of your
comment. Also, include this contact
information on the outside of any disk
or CD ROM you submit, and in any
cover letter accompanying the disk or
CD ROM. This ensures that you can be
identified as the submitter of the
comment and allows EPA to contact you
in case EPA cannot read your comment
due to technical difficulties or needs
further information on the substance of
your comment. EPA’s policy is that EPA
will not edit your comment, and any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA’s
electronic public docket to submit
comments to EPA electronically is
EPA’s preferred method for receiving
comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets
at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/, and
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘search,’’ and then key in
docket ID number OPP–2005–0212. The
system is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’system, which means EPA will
not know your identity, e-mail address,
or other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by
e-mail to opp-docket@epa.gov,
Attention: Docket ID number OPP–
2005–0212. In contrast to EPA’s
electronic public docket, EPA’s e-mail
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to the docket without going
through EPA’s electronic public docket,
EPA’s e-mail system automatically
captures your e-mail address. E-mail
addresses that are automatically
captured by EPA’s e-mail system are
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the official public docket, and
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:23 Aug 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket.
iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit
comments on a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to the mailing address
identified in Unit I.C.2. These electronic
submissions will be accepted in
WordPerfect or ASCII file format. Avoid
the use of special characters and any
form of encryption.
2. By mail. Send your comments to:
Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office
of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001, Attention: Docket ID
number OPP–2005–0212.
3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver
your comments to: Public Information
and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB),
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm.
119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID
number OPP–2005–0212. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
docket’s normal hours of operation as
identified in Unit I.B.1.
D. How Should I Submit CBI to the
Agency?
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI electronically
through EPA’s electronic public docket
or by e-mail. You may claim
information that you submit to EPA as
CBI by marking any part or all of that
information as CBI (if you submit CBI
on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside
of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD ROM the specific information that is
CBI). Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
In addition to one complete version of
the comment that includes any
information claimed as CBI, a copy of
the comment that does not contain the
information claimed as CBI must be
submitted for inclusion in the public
docket and EPA’s electronic public
docket. If you submit the copy that does
not contain CBI on disk or CD ROM,
mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM
clearly that it does not contain CBI.
Information not marked as CBI will be
included in the public docket and EPA’s
electronic public docket without prior
notice. If you have any questions about
CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI,
please consult the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following
suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as
possible.
2. Describe any assumptions that you
used.
3. Provide copies of any technical
information and/or data you used that
support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or
costs, explain how you arrived at the
estimate that you provide.
5. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns.
6. Make sure to submit your
comments by the deadline in this
notice.
7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
be sure to identify the docket ID number
assigned to this action in the subject
line on the first page of your response.
You may also provide the name, date,
and Federal Register citation.
II. What Action is the Agency Taking?
EPA has received a pesticide petition
as follows proposing the establishment
and/or amendment of regulations for
residues of a certain pesticide chemical
in or on various food commodities
under section 408 of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21
U.S.C. 346a. EPA has determined that
this petition contains data or
information regarding the elements set
forth in FFDCA section 408(d)(2);
however, EPA has not fully evaluated
the sufficiency of the submitted data at
this time or whether the data support
granting of the petition. Additional data
may be needed before EPA rules on the
petition.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection,
Agricultural commodities, Feed
additives, Food additives, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 9, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Summary of Petition
The petitioner’s summary of the
pesticide petition is printed below as
required by FFDCA section 408(d)(3).
The summary of the petition was
prepared by Syngenta Crop Protection,
and represents the view of the
petitioner. The petition summary
announces the availability of a
description of the analytical methods
available to EPA for the detection and
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 24, 2005 / Notices
measurement of the pesticide chemical
residues or an explanation of why no
such method is needed.
Syngenta Crop Protection
PP 3F6574
EPA has received a pesticide petition
(3F6574) from Syngenta Crop
Protection, Inc., P.O. Box 18300,
Greensboro, NC 27419 proposing,
pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part
180 by establishing tolerances for
residues of emamectin benzoate, 4’-epimethylamino- 4’-deoxyavermectin B1
benzoate (a mixture of a minimum of
90% 4’-epi-methylamino-4’deoxyavermectin B1a and a maximum of
10% 4’-epi-methlyamino4’deoxyavermectin B1b benzoate), and
its metabolites 8,9 isomer of the B1a and
B1b component of the parent insecticide
in or on the raw agricultural
commodities pome fruit at 0.02 parts
per million (ppm).
A. Residue Chemistry
1. Plant metabolism. The metabolism
of emamectin benzoate in plants has
been studied and the nature of the
residue has been determined in lettuce,
cabbage, and sweet corn. The major
portion of the residue is parent
compound and its delta 8,9photoisomer. The metabolism of
emamectin has also been investigated in
goats and poultry to characterize the fate
of residues that may be present in
animal feed items.
2. Analytical method. Adequate
analytical methods (High Production
Liquid Chromatography -fluorescence
methods) are available for enforcement
purposes.
3. Magnitude of residues. The
appropriate number of residue trials has
been conducted for the representative
commodities of the pome fruit crop
group (Crop Group 11). Those
representative commodities are apples
and pears. These trials were conducted
in the major U.S. growing areas for these
crops. Processing studies were
conducted to provide wet apple pomace
and juice for analysis and to determine
if a tolerance in these commodities is
necessary.
B. Toxicological Profile
A full description of the studies
describing the toxicity, animal
metabolism, metabolite toxicology, and
endocrine disruption of emamectin
benzoate can be found in the posting for
its first tolerances in the Federal
Register. (64 FR 27192–27200, May 19,
1999).
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:23 Aug 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
C. Aggregate Exposure
1. Dietary exposure. A Tier III acute
and chronic dietary exposure evaluation
was made using the Dietary Exposure
Evaluation Model (DEEMTM, version
7.76 from Exponent. Empirically
derived processing studies for apple
juice (0.27X), apple wet pomace (3.79X),
cottonseed meal (0.12X), cottonseed oil
(0.43X), tomato puree (0.32X), and
tomatoes after washing (0.53X) were
used in these assessments. The apple
juice processing factor was used as a
surrogate for pear juice; all other
processing factors used DEEMTM
defaults. All consumption data for these
assessments were taken from the
USDA’s Continuing Survey of Food
Intake by individuals (CSFII) with the
1994–96 consumption database and the
Supplemental CSFII children’s survey
(1998) consumption database. These
exposure assessments included all
registered and pending uses on crops,
including leafy vegetables (crop group
4), head and stem Brassica vegetables
(crop group 5A), Brassica leafy
vegetables (crop group 5B), fruiting
vegetables (crop group 8), pome fruit
(crop group 11), cotton, and turnip tops.
Secondary residues in animal
commodities were estimated based on
theoretical worst-case, yet nutritionally
adequate, animal diets and transfer
information from feeding studies.
i. Food. For the purposes of assessing
the potential dietary exposure under the
proposed tolerances, Syngenta Crop
Protection has estimated aggregate
exposure from all crops for which
tolerances are established or proposed.
These assessments utilized residue data
from field trials where emamectin
benzoate was applied at the EPAapproved maximum use rate and
samples were harvested at the minimum
pre-harvest interval to maximize
anticipated residues. Percent of crop
treated values were estimated based
upon economic, pest and competitive
pressures. The values used in these
assessments were: Turnip tops 100%,
celery 100%, Brassica vegetables 100%,
tomatoes 11%, head lettuce 52%, leafy
vegetables 5.9%, peppers 20%, cotton
2.3%, and pome fruit 35%.
a. Acute exposure. An acute reference
dose (aRfD) for emamectin benzoate of
0.00025 milligrams/kilogram body
weight/day (mg/kg bwt/day) for infants,
children, and females 13 years and older
was based upon a 0.075 mg/kg bwt/day
NOAEL from a 15–day neurotoxicity
study in mice, using an uncertainly
factor of 100X. An additional Food
Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety
factor of 3X was also applied. For the
purpose of aggregate risk assessment,
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49609
the exposure value was expressed in
terms of margin of exposure (MOE),
which was calculated by dividing the no
observable effect level (NOAEL) by the
exposure for each population subgroup.
In addition, exposure was expressed as
a percent of the acute reference dose (%
aRfD). Acute exposure to the most
exposed sub-population (children 1 and
2 years old) resulted in a MOE of 403
(74% of the aRfD of 0.00025 mg/kg bwt/
day). Since the benchmark MOE for this
assessment was 300, and since EPA
generally has no concern for exposures
below 100% of the RfD, Syngenta
believes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result from
dietary (food) exposure to residues
arising from the current uses and the
proposed pome fruit use for emamectin
benzoate.
b. Chronic exposure. A chronic
reference dose (cRfD) for emamectin
benzoate of 0.000083 mg/kg bwt/day for
infants, children, and females 13 years
and older was based upon a 0.075 mg/
kg bwt/day NOAEL from a 15–day
neurotoxicity study in mice, using an
uncertainly factor of 100X. An FQPA
safety factor of 3X was also applied,
plus an additional 3X safety factor for
use of a toxicology study of short
duration. The emamectin benzoate Tier
III chronic dietary exposure assessment
was based upon residue field trial
results. For the purpose of aggregate risk
assessment, the exposure values were
expressed in terms of MOE, which was
calculated by dividing the no observable
effect level (NOAEL) by the exposure for
each population subgroup. In addition,
exposure was expressed as a percent of
the reference dose %RfD. Chronic
exposure to the most exposed subpopulation (children 1 and 2 years old)
resulted in a MOE of 4,411 (21% of the
cRfD of 0.000083 mg/kg bwt/day). Since
the benchmark MOE for this assessment
was 900, and since EPA generally has
no concern for exposures below 100%
of the RfD, Syngenta believes that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from dietary (food) exposure
to residues arising from the current and
proposed uses for emamectin benzoate.
ii. Drinking water—a. Chronic
exposure. The estimated maximum
concentrations of emamectin benzoate
in surface and ground water are 0.02
parts per billion (ppb), (Pesticide Root
Zone Model/Exposure Modeling System
(PRZM/EXAMS)) and 0.0005 ppb
(screening concentration in ground
water (SCI-GROW)), respectively. The
chronic PAD for emamectin benzoate is
0.000083 mg/kg bwt/day for the females
13+ years, infants’ and children’s
subgroups and 0.00025 mg/kg bwt/day
for all other population subgroups.
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
49610
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 24, 2005 / Notices
From the chronic dietary exposure
analysis, the highest exposure estimate
of 0.000017 mg/kg bwt/day was
determined for the children’s (1–2 years
old) subgroup. Based on EPA’s ‘‘Interim
Guidance for Conducting Drinking
Water Exposure and Risk Assessments’’
document (December 2, 1997), chronic
drinking water levels of comparisons
(DWLOCs) for emamectin benzoate were
calculated to be 0.7 ppb for the
children’s (1–2 years old) subgroup.
Based on this analysis, emamectin
benzoate estimated environmental
concentrations (EECs) do not exceed the
calculated chronic DWLOC.
b. Acute exposure. The estimated
maximum concentrations of emamectin
benzoate in surface and ground water
are 0.1 ppb PRZM/EXAMS and 0.0005
ppb SCI-GROW, respectively. The acute
population adjusted dose (aPAD) for
emamectin benzoate is 0.00025 mg/kg
bwt/day for the females 13+ years,
infants’ and children’s subgroups and
0.00075 mg/kg bwt/day for all other
population subgroups. From the acute
dietary exposure analysis, the highest
acute food exposure from the uses of
emamectin benzoate was 0.000186 mg/
kg/day (children 1–2 years old) at the
99.9th percentile of exposures. Using
this information, acute DWLOC for
emamectin benzoate was calculated to
be 0.6 ppb for the children’s (1–2 years
old) subgroup. Based on this analysis,
emamectin benzoate EECs do not exceed
the calculated acute DWLOC.
2. Non-dietary exposure. No products
containing emamectin benzoate are
registered under the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
for any non-food use. No significant
non-dietary, non-occupational exposure
is anticipated.
3. Aggregate Exposure. Based on the
completeness and reliability of the
toxicity data supporting these petitions,
Syngenta believes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to
residues arising from all current and
proposed emamectin benzoate uses,
including anticipated dietary exposure
from food, water, and all other types of
non-occupational exposures.
D. Cumulative Effects
Emamectin benzoate is synthetically
derived from avermectin, which is
derived from Streptomyces avermitilus.
Streptomyces avermitilus produces the
insecticide avermectin, which is a
mixture of two homologs, avermectin
B1a and B1b, each having equal
biological activity. Currently, the only
other member of this class that is
registered for agricultural uses is
abamectin. Abamectin and ivermectin
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:23 Aug 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
are structurally similar to emamectin.
EPA does not have, at this time, data to
determine whether emamectin benzoate
has a common mechanism of toxicity
with other substances or the means to
include this pesticide in a cumulative
risk assessment. Unlike other pesticides
for which EPA has followed a
cumulative risk approach based upon a
common mechanism of toxicity,
emamectin benzoate does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite that is
produced by other substances. For the
purpose of this tolerance action;
therefore, Syngenta has assumed that
emamectin benzoate does not have a
mechanism of toxicity common to these
other substances.
E. Safety Determination
1. U.S. population—i. Acute risk.
Exposure to emamectin benzoate
residues in food will occupy no more
than 74% of the aPAD for the most
sensitive population subgroup (children
1–2 years old). Residue values used for
these dietary risk assessments were from
field trials and did incorporate percent
of crop treated information. Acute
dietary exposure estimates were
determined at the 99.9th percentile of
acute exposures. Estimated
concentrations of emamectin residues in
surface and ground water are lower than
the DWLOC. Therefore, Syngenta does
not expect acute aggregate risk to
emamectin benzoate residues from food
and water sources to exceed the level of
concern for acute dietary exposure.
ii. Chronic risk. The chronic dietary
exposure to emamectin residues in food
is no more than 21% for the most
sensitive population subgroup (children
1–2 years old). Residue values used for
these dietary risk assessments were from
field trials and did incorporate percent
of crop treated information, as indicated
above. The estimated concentrations of
emamectin residues in surface and
ground water are lower than the
DWLOC. The expected chronic
aggregate risk to emamectin residues
from food and water sources would not
be expected to exceed the level of
concern for chronic dietary exposure.
Syngenta has considered the potential
aggregate exposure from food, water and
non-occupational exposure routes and
concluded that aggregate exposure is not
expected to exceed 100% of the acute
and chronic reference doses. Thus there
is a reasonable certainty of no harm to
infants and children from the aggregate
exposure to residues of emamectin
benzoate in food and water.
2. Infants and children. For
emamectin benzoate, the Agency has
determined that the 10x safety factor for
the protection of infants and children
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
should be reduced to 3x. The rationale
for reducing the FQPA Safety Factor is
based on the fact that no increased
susceptibility was demonstrated in rats
or rabbits following in utero and/or
postnatal exposure to emamectin.
Although, increased susceptibility
was demonstrated in a developmental
neurotoxicity study in rats, the EPA
determined that the 10x factor should be
reduced to 3x based on the following
weight-of-the-evidence considerations
in the developmental neurotoxicity
study:
i. The LOAEL was based on a single
effect/end point (i.e., decrease in open
field motor activity).
ii. The effect at the LOAEL was seen
only on postnatal day 17 and was not
seen either on earlier day 13 or later day
21 evaluations whereas at the high dose
(3.6/2.5 mg/kg/day), this effect was seen
on postnatal days 13 and 17;
iii. The effect at the LOAEL was not
accompanied with other toxicity
whereas at the high dose, tremors and
hind limb splay were also seen.
iv. The decreased performance was
lower only when compared to the
concurrent control, and;
v. There were limited (only 2 studies)
historical control data available for
comparison.
Syngenta believes that the clinical
signs of avermectin-family based
neurotoxicity seen in neonatal rats are
unlikely to be useful predictors of
human risk. Young rats are considerably
more sensitive to avermectin-type
compounds than either adult rats or
humans and other primates. (In neonatal
rats, unlike humans, the P-glycoprotein
levels are only a small fraction of the
levels seen in adult rats.) Moreover, data
from clinical experience with
ivermectin, a related human drug, and
studies on ivermectin and abamectin, a
related pesticide, demonstrate that both
the neonatal rat and the CF–1 mouse
overpredict the toxicity of the
avermectin-type compounds to humans
and to non-human primates.
3. Conclusion. There is a complete
toxicity database for emamectin
benzoate and exposure data is complete
or is conservatively estimated based on
data that reasonably accounts for
potential exposures. Based on these risk
assessments, Syngenta concludes that,
there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result to infants and children
from aggregate exposure to emamectin
benzoate residues.
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 24, 2005 / Notices
F. International Tolerances
No codex maximum residue levels
(MRLs) have been established for
residues of emamectin benzoate.
[FR Doc. 05–16806 Filed 8–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–7958–5]
Florida Petroleum Reprocessors
Superfund Site; Notice of Proposed
Settlement
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed de minimis
settlement.
SUMMARY: Under section 122(g)(4) of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA), the Environmental
Protection Agency has offered a de
minimis settlement at the Florida
Petroleum Reprocessors Superfund Site
(Site) located in Davie, Florida. EPA
will consider public comments until
September 23, 2005. EPA may withdraw
from or modify the proposed settlement
should such comments disclose facts or
considerations which indicated the
proposed settlement is inappropriate,
improper, or inadequate. Copies of the
proposed settlement are available from:
Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, Superfund Enforcement &
Information Management Branch, Waste
Management Division, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303,
(404) 562–8887, E-mail:
Batchelor.Paula@EPA.gov.
Written or e-mail comments may be
submitted to Paula V. Batchelor at the
above address within 30 days of the date
of publication.
Dated: August 10, 2005.
Rosalind H. Brown,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information
Management Branch, Waste Management
Division.
[FR Doc. 05–16812 Filed 8–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6550–60–P
Public Information Collections
Approved By Office of Management
and Budget
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) has received Office
Jkt 205001
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
August 10, 2005.
August 9, 2005.
15:23 Aug 23, 2005
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–16335 Filed 8–23–05; 8:45 am]
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission
for Extension Under Delegated
Authority
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
VerDate jul<14>2003
of Management and Budget (OMB)
approval for the following public
information collections pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
J. Laurenzano, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554, (202) 418–1359
or via the Internet at plaurenz@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control No.: 3060–0806.
OMB Approval date: 11/12/2004.
Expiration Date: 11/30/2007.
Title: Universal Service—Schools and
Libraries Universal Service Program.
Form No.: FCC 470. FCC 471.
Estimated Annual Burden: 60,000
responses; 480,000 total annual burden
hours; approximately .166–4.5 hours
average per respondent.
Needs and Uses: In 1997 the
Commission adopted rules providing
support for the Universal Service
Schools and Libraries Support
Mechanism (E-rate Program). FCC
Forms 470 and 471 are required to
determine eligibility by schools and
libraries for discounts under the
program, so that they can purchase
telecommunications services, internet
access, internal connections, and
maintenance services. Pursuant to
suggestions from the Department of
Justice, the Commission is now
implementing changes to its FCC Forms
470 and 471 in an effort to prevent
waste, fraud and abuse in the program.
The changes made to the FCC Forms
470 and 471 will make the E-Rate
process more transparent, and will make
transgressions of the law easier to detect
and prosecute.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49611
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Persons wishing to comment on
this information collection should
submit comments October 24, 2005. If
you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
comments by email or U.S. postal mail.
To submit you comments by e-mail send
them to: PRA@fcc.gov. To submit your
comments by U.S. mail, mark it to the
attention of Leslie F. Smith, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room 1–A804, Washington,
DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information about the
information collection(s) send an email
to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Leslie F.
Smith at (202) 418–0217.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0532.
Title: Scanning Receiver Compliance
Exhibit, Section 2.1033 (b)(10) and
Section 15.121.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Not-for-profit
institutions; Business or other for-profit;
and State, Local or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 40.
Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour.
Frequency of Response:
Recordkeeping, On occasion reporting
requirement; Third party disclosure.
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49607-49611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16806]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[OPP-2005-0212; FRL-7728-3]
Emamectin; Notice of Filing a Pesticide Petition to Establish a
Tolerance for a Certain Pesticide Chemical in or on Food
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of a pesticide
petition proposing the establishment of regulations for residues of a
certain pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities.
DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number OPP-
2005-0212, must be received on or before September 23, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or
through hand delivery/courier. Follow the detailed instructions as
provided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Harris, Registration Division
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 308-9423; e-mail address:harris.thomas@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111)
Animal production (NAICS code 112)
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311)
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532)
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this
action under docket ID number OPP-2005-0212. The official public docket
consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any
public comments received, and other information related to this action.
Although, a part of the official docket, the public docket does not
include Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket
is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at
the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119,
Crystal Mall 2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. This docket
facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number is (703) 305-
5805.
2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may
use EPA Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/ to submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that
are available electronically. Although, not all docket materials may be
available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly
available docket materials through the docket facility identified in
Unit I.B.1. Once in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the
appropriate docket ID number.
Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA
Dockets. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute, which is not included in the
official public docket, will not be available for public viewing in
EPA's electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted
material will not be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will
be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket.
To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials will be
made available in EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is
selected from the index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify
whether the document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic
public docket. Although, not all docket materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available
docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I.B.
EPA intends to work towards providing electronic access to all of the
publicly available docket materials through EPA's electronic public
docket.
For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy
is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or on paper,
will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public
docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment
containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that
material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's
electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the
copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket.
Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or
delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public
docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the docket will
be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where
practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph
will be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief
description written by the docket staff.
C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand
delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the
appropriate docket ID number in the subject line on the first page of
your comment. Please ensure that your comments are
[[Page 49608]]
submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after
the close of the comment period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not
required to consider these late comments. If you wish to submit CBI or
information that is otherwise protected by statute, please follow the
instructions in Unit I.D. Do not use EPA Dockets or e-mail to submit
CBI or information protected by statute.
1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as
prescribed in this unit, EPA recommends that you include your name,
mailing address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in
the body of your comment. Also, include this contact information on the
outside of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter
accompanying the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be
identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact
you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
or needs further information on the substance of your comment. EPA's
policy is that EPA will not edit your comment, and any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to
submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for
receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/
edocket/, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Once in the system, select ``search,'' and then key in docket ID number
OPP-2005-0212. The system is an ``anonymous access''system, which means
EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by e-mail to opp-docket@epa.gov,
Attention: Docket ID number OPP-2005-0212. In contrast to EPA's
electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail system is not an ``anonymous
access'' system. If you send an e-mail comment directly to the docket
without going through EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail
system automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail addresses
that are automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system are included as
part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and
made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM
that you mail to the mailing address identified in Unit I.C.2. These
electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII file
format. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption.
2. By mail. Send your comments to: Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001, Attention: Docket ID number OPP-2005-0212.
3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver your comments to: Public
Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Office of Pesticide
Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall
2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID
number OPP-2005-0212. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
docket's normal hours of operation as identified in Unit I.B.1.
D. How Should I Submit CBI to the Agency?
Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI
electronically through EPA's electronic public docket or by e-mail. You
may claim information that you submit to EPA as CBI by marking any part
or all of that information as CBI (if you submit CBI on disk or CD ROM,
mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify
electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that
is CBI). Information so marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes
any information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion
in the public docket and EPA's electronic public docket. If you submit
the copy that does not contain CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside
of the disk or CD ROM clearly that it does not contain CBI. Information
not marked as CBI will be included in the public docket and EPA's
electronic public docket without prior notice. If you have any
questions about CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI, please consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this
notice.
7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.
II. What Action is the Agency Taking?
EPA has received a pesticide petition as follows proposing the
establishment and/or amendment of regulations for residues of a certain
pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities under section 408
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a.
EPA has determined that this petition contains data or information
regarding the elements set forth in FFDCA section 408(d)(2); however,
EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at
this time or whether the data support granting of the petition.
Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives,
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 9, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Summary of Petition
The petitioner's summary of the pesticide petition is printed
below as required by FFDCA section 408(d)(3). The summary of the
petition was prepared by Syngenta Crop Protection, and represents the
view of the petitioner. The petition summary announces the availability
of a description of the analytical methods available to EPA for the
detection and
[[Page 49609]]
measurement of the pesticide chemical residues or an explanation of why
no such method is needed.
Syngenta Crop Protection
PP 3F6574
EPA has received a pesticide petition (3F6574) from Syngenta Crop
Protection, Inc., P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419 proposing,
pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180 by establishing
tolerances for residues of emamectin benzoate, 4'-epi-methylamino- 4'-
deoxyavermectin B1 benzoate (a mixture of a minimum of 90%
4'-epi-methylamino-4'- deoxyavermectin B1a and a maximum of
10% 4'-epi-methlyamino-4'deoxyavermectin B1b benzoate), and
its metabolites 8,9 isomer of the B1a and B1b
component of the parent insecticide in or on the raw agricultural
commodities pome fruit at 0.02 parts per million (ppm).
A. Residue Chemistry
1. Plant metabolism. The metabolism of emamectin benzoate in plants
has been studied and the nature of the residue has been determined in
lettuce, cabbage, and sweet corn. The major portion of the residue is
parent compound and its delta 8,9-photoisomer. The metabolism of
emamectin has also been investigated in goats and poultry to
characterize the fate of residues that may be present in animal feed
items.
2. Analytical method. Adequate analytical methods (High Production
Liquid Chromatography -fluorescence methods) are available for
enforcement purposes.
3. Magnitude of residues. The appropriate number of residue trials
has been conducted for the representative commodities of the pome fruit
crop group (Crop Group 11). Those representative commodities are apples
and pears. These trials were conducted in the major U.S. growing areas
for these crops. Processing studies were conducted to provide wet apple
pomace and juice for analysis and to determine if a tolerance in these
commodities is necessary.
B. Toxicological Profile
A full description of the studies describing the toxicity, animal
metabolism, metabolite toxicology, and endocrine disruption of
emamectin benzoate can be found in the posting for its first tolerances
in the Federal Register. (64 FR 27192-27200, May 19, 1999).
C. Aggregate Exposure
1. Dietary exposure. A Tier III acute and chronic dietary exposure
evaluation was made using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model
(DEEMTM, version 7.76 from Exponent. Empirically derived
processing studies for apple juice (0.27X), apple wet pomace (3.79X),
cottonseed meal (0.12X), cottonseed oil (0.43X), tomato puree (0.32X),
and tomatoes after washing (0.53X) were used in these assessments. The
apple juice processing factor was used as a surrogate for pear juice;
all other processing factors used DEEMTM defaults. All
consumption data for these assessments were taken from the USDA's
Continuing Survey of Food Intake by individuals (CSFII) with the 1994-
96 consumption database and the Supplemental CSFII children's survey
(1998) consumption database. These exposure assessments included all
registered and pending uses on crops, including leafy vegetables (crop
group 4), head and stem Brassica vegetables (crop group 5A), Brassica
leafy vegetables (crop group 5B), fruiting vegetables (crop group 8),
pome fruit (crop group 11), cotton, and turnip tops. Secondary residues
in animal commodities were estimated based on theoretical worst-case,
yet nutritionally adequate, animal diets and transfer information from
feeding studies.
i. Food. For the purposes of assessing the potential dietary
exposure under the proposed tolerances, Syngenta Crop Protection has
estimated aggregate exposure from all crops for which tolerances are
established or proposed. These assessments utilized residue data from
field trials where emamectin benzoate was applied at the EPA-approved
maximum use rate and samples were harvested at the minimum pre-harvest
interval to maximize anticipated residues. Percent of crop treated
values were estimated based upon economic, pest and competitive
pressures. The values used in these assessments were: Turnip tops 100%,
celery 100%, Brassica vegetables 100%, tomatoes 11%, head lettuce 52%,
leafy vegetables 5.9%, peppers 20%, cotton 2.3%, and pome fruit 35%.
a. Acute exposure. An acute reference dose (aRfD) for emamectin
benzoate of 0.00025 milligrams/kilogram body weight/day (mg/kg bwt/day)
for infants, children, and females 13 years and older was based upon a
0.075 mg/kg bwt/day NOAEL from a 15-day neurotoxicity study in mice,
using an uncertainly factor of 100X. An additional Food Quality
Protection Act (FQPA) safety factor of 3X was also applied. For the
purpose of aggregate risk assessment, the exposure value was expressed
in terms of margin of exposure (MOE), which was calculated by dividing
the no observable effect level (NOAEL) by the exposure for each
population subgroup. In addition, exposure was expressed as a percent
of the acute reference dose (% aRfD). Acute exposure to the most
exposed sub-population (children 1 and 2 years old) resulted in a MOE
of 403 (74% of the aRfD of 0.00025 mg/kg bwt/day). Since the benchmark
MOE for this assessment was 300, and since EPA generally has no concern
for exposures below 100% of the RfD, Syngenta believes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from dietary (food)
exposure to residues arising from the current uses and the proposed
pome fruit use for emamectin benzoate.
b. Chronic exposure. A chronic reference dose (cRfD) for emamectin
benzoate of 0.000083 mg/kg bwt/day for infants, children, and females
13 years and older was based upon a 0.075 mg/kg bwt/day NOAEL from a
15-day neurotoxicity study in mice, using an uncertainly factor of
100X. An FQPA safety factor of 3X was also applied, plus an additional
3X safety factor for use of a toxicology study of short duration. The
emamectin benzoate Tier III chronic dietary exposure assessment was
based upon residue field trial results. For the purpose of aggregate
risk assessment, the exposure values were expressed in terms of MOE,
which was calculated by dividing the no observable effect level (NOAEL)
by the exposure for each population subgroup. In addition, exposure was
expressed as a percent of the reference dose %RfD. Chronic exposure to
the most exposed sub-population (children 1 and 2 years old) resulted
in a MOE of 4,411 (21% of the cRfD of 0.000083 mg/kg bwt/day). Since
the benchmark MOE for this assessment was 900, and since EPA generally
has no concern for exposures below 100% of the RfD, Syngenta believes
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from
dietary (food) exposure to residues arising from the current and
proposed uses for emamectin benzoate.
ii. Drinking water--a. Chronic exposure. The estimated maximum
concentrations of emamectin benzoate in surface and ground water are
0.02 parts per billion (ppb), (Pesticide Root Zone Model/Exposure
Modeling System (PRZM/EXAMS)) and 0.0005 ppb (screening concentration
in ground water (SCI-GROW)), respectively. The chronic PAD for
emamectin benzoate is 0.000083 mg/kg bwt/day for the females 13+ years,
infants' and children's subgroups and 0.00025 mg/kg bwt/day for all
other population subgroups.
[[Page 49610]]
From the chronic dietary exposure analysis, the highest exposure
estimate of 0.000017 mg/kg bwt/day was determined for the children's
(1-2 years old) subgroup. Based on EPA's ``Interim Guidance for
Conducting Drinking Water Exposure and Risk Assessments'' document
(December 2, 1997), chronic drinking water levels of comparisons
(DWLOCs) for emamectin benzoate were calculated to be 0.7 ppb for the
children's (1-2 years old) subgroup. Based on this analysis, emamectin
benzoate estimated environmental concentrations (EECs) do not exceed
the calculated chronic DWLOC.
b. Acute exposure. The estimated maximum concentrations of
emamectin benzoate in surface and ground water are 0.1 ppb PRZM/EXAMS
and 0.0005 ppb SCI-GROW, respectively. The acute population adjusted
dose (aPAD) for emamectin benzoate is 0.00025 mg/kg bwt/day for the
females 13+ years, infants' and children's subgroups and 0.00075 mg/kg
bwt/day for all other population subgroups. From the acute dietary
exposure analysis, the highest acute food exposure from the uses of
emamectin benzoate was 0.000186 mg/kg/day (children 1-2 years old) at
the 99.9th percentile of exposures. Using this information,
acute DWLOC for emamectin benzoate was calculated to be 0.6 ppb for the
children's (1-2 years old) subgroup. Based on this analysis, emamectin
benzoate EECs do not exceed the calculated acute DWLOC.
2. Non-dietary exposure. No products containing emamectin benzoate
are registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) for any non-food use. No significant non-
dietary, non-occupational exposure is anticipated.
3. Aggregate Exposure. Based on the completeness and reliability of
the toxicity data supporting these petitions, Syngenta believes that
there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate
exposure to residues arising from all current and proposed emamectin
benzoate uses, including anticipated dietary exposure from food, water,
and all other types of non-occupational exposures.
D. Cumulative Effects
Emamectin benzoate is synthetically derived from avermectin, which
is derived from Streptomyces avermitilus. Streptomyces avermitilus
produces the insecticide avermectin, which is a mixture of two
homologs, avermectin B1a and B1b, each having
equal biological activity. Currently, the only other member of this
class that is registered for agricultural uses is abamectin. Abamectin
and ivermectin are structurally similar to emamectin. EPA does not
have, at this time, data to determine whether emamectin benzoate has a
common mechanism of toxicity with other substances or the means to
include this pesticide in a cumulative risk assessment. Unlike other
pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative risk approach based
upon a common mechanism of toxicity, emamectin benzoate does not appear
to produce a toxic metabolite that is produced by other substances. For
the purpose of this tolerance action; therefore, Syngenta has assumed
that emamectin benzoate does not have a mechanism of toxicity common to
these other substances.
E. Safety Determination
1. U.S. population--i. Acute risk. Exposure to emamectin benzoate
residues in food will occupy no more than 74% of the aPAD for the most
sensitive population subgroup (children 1-2 years old). Residue values
used for these dietary risk assessments were from field trials and did
incorporate percent of crop treated information. Acute dietary exposure
estimates were determined at the 99.9th percentile of acute
exposures. Estimated concentrations of emamectin residues in surface
and ground water are lower than the DWLOC. Therefore, Syngenta does not
expect acute aggregate risk to emamectin benzoate residues from food
and water sources to exceed the level of concern for acute dietary
exposure.
ii. Chronic risk. The chronic dietary exposure to emamectin
residues in food is no more than 21% for the most sensitive population
subgroup (children 1-2 years old). Residue values used for these
dietary risk assessments were from field trials and did incorporate
percent of crop treated information, as indicated above. The estimated
concentrations of emamectin residues in surface and ground water are
lower than the DWLOC. The expected chronic aggregate risk to emamectin
residues from food and water sources would not be expected to exceed
the level of concern for chronic dietary exposure.
Syngenta has considered the potential aggregate exposure from
food, water and non-occupational exposure routes and concluded that
aggregate exposure is not expected to exceed 100% of the acute and
chronic reference doses. Thus there is a reasonable certainty of no
harm to infants and children from the aggregate exposure to residues of
emamectin benzoate in food and water.
2. Infants and children. For emamectin benzoate, the Agency has
determined that the 10x safety factor for the protection of infants and
children should be reduced to 3x. The rationale for reducing the FQPA
Safety Factor is based on the fact that no increased susceptibility was
demonstrated in rats or rabbits following in utero and/or postnatal
exposure to emamectin.
Although, increased susceptibility was demonstrated in a
developmental neurotoxicity study in rats, the EPA determined that the
10x factor should be reduced to 3x based on the following weight-of-
the-evidence considerations in the developmental neurotoxicity study:
i. The LOAEL was based on a single effect/end point (i.e., decrease
in open field motor activity).
ii. The effect at the LOAEL was seen only on postnatal day 17 and
was not seen either on earlier day 13 or later day 21 evaluations
whereas at the high dose (3.6/2.5 mg/kg/day), this effect was seen on
postnatal days 13 and 17;
iii. The effect at the LOAEL was not accompanied with other
toxicity whereas at the high dose, tremors and hind limb splay were
also seen.
iv. The decreased performance was lower only when compared to the
concurrent control, and;
v. There were limited (only 2 studies) historical control data
available for comparison.
Syngenta believes that the clinical signs of avermectin-family
based neurotoxicity seen in neonatal rats are unlikely to be useful
predictors of human risk. Young rats are considerably more sensitive to
avermectin-type compounds than either adult rats or humans and other
primates. (In neonatal rats, unlike humans, the P-glycoprotein levels
are only a small fraction of the levels seen in adult rats.) Moreover,
data from clinical experience with ivermectin, a related human drug,
and studies on ivermectin and abamectin, a related pesticide,
demonstrate that both the neonatal rat and the CF-1 mouse overpredict
the toxicity of the avermectin-type compounds to humans and to non-
human primates.
3. Conclusion. There is a complete toxicity database for emamectin
benzoate and exposure data is complete or is conservatively estimated
based on data that reasonably accounts for potential exposures. Based
on these risk assessments, Syngenta concludes that, there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children
from aggregate exposure to emamectin benzoate residues.
[[Page 49611]]
F. International Tolerances
No codex maximum residue levels (MRLs) have been established for
residues of emamectin benzoate.
[FR Doc. 05-16806 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S