Kiwifruit Grown in California; Relaxation of Pack Requirements, 48839-48842 [05-16571]

Download as PDF 48839 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 70, No. 161 Monday, August 22, 2005 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Review This rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with Executive Order 12866. 5 CFR Parts 841, 842, and 843 RIN 3206–AK57 Federal Employees’ Retirement System; Death Benefits and Employee Refunds Office of Personnel Management. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing Final rules that revise the table of reduction factors for early commencing dates of survivor annuities for spouses of separated employees who die before the date on which they would be eligible for unreduced deferred annuities, and to revise the annuity factor for spouses of deceased employees who die in service when those spouses elect to receive the basic employee death benefit in 36 installments under the Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS) Act of 1986. These rules are necessary to conform the tables to the previously published economic assumptions adopted by the Board of Actuaries. DATES: This final rule is effective October 1, 2004. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karla Yeakle, (202) 606–0299. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 1, 2004, we published (at 69 FR 69805) interim regulations to revise the normal cost percentage under the Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS) Act of 1986, Public Law 99–335, 100 Stat. 514, based on changed economic assumptions and demographic factors adopted by the Board of Actuaries of the Civil Service Retirement System. Those changed economic assumptions (principally the change in expected investment return from 6.75 percent to 6.25 percent) VerDate jul<14>2003 16:02 Aug 19, 2005 Jkt 205001 require corresponding changes in factors used to produce actuarially equivalent benefits when required by the FERS Act. The revised factors were effective on October 1, 2004. To implement these changes in factors, we issued interim regulations on December 1, 2004. At that time we also requested comments on the interim regulations. We received no comments. Accordingly we are now adopting the interim regulation as final without change. Regulatory Flexibility Act I certify that this regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because the regulation will only affect retirement payments to retired employees, spouses, and former spouses. List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 841, 842 and 843 Administrative practice and procedure, Air traffic controllers, Alimony, Claims, Disability benefits, Firefighters, Government employees, Income taxes, Intergovernmental relations, Law enforcement officers, Pensions, Retirement. Office of Personnel Management. Linda M. Springer, Director. Accordingly, the Office of Personnel Management adopts its interim regulations amending 5 CFR parts 841, 842, and 843 published at 69 FR 69805 on December 1, 2004, as final rule without change. I [FR Doc. 05–16592 Filed 8–19–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6325–39–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 920 [Docket No. FV05–920–1 FR] Kiwifruit Grown in California; Relaxation of Pack Requirements AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This rule revises the pack requirements for California kiwifruit under the California kiwifruit marketing order (order). The order regulates the handling of kiwifruit grown in California and is administered locally by the Kiwifruit Administrative Committee (Committee). This rule requires that kiwifruit marked as Size 39 or 42 not vary in diameter by more than 3⁄8 inch, regardless of pack type. In addition, the three tables that are currently under the pack regulation will be consolidated into one. By allowing handlers to utilize a single table for kiwifruit size designations and size variation tolerances regardless of pack or container, this rule is expected to simplify requirements for the industry, reduce handler packing costs, increase grower returns, and increase flexibility in handler packing operations. EFFECTIVE DATE: August 23, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shereen Marino, Marketing Specialist, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487– 5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720– 2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov. This final rule is issued under Marketing Order No. 920 as amended (7 CFR part 920), regulating the handling of kiwifruit grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM 22AUR1 48840 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 161 / Monday, August 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations conformance with Executive Order 12866. This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing USDA will rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. This rule revises the pack requirements for California kiwifruit under the order. This rule requires that Size 39 and Size 42 fruit not vary in size by more than 3⁄8 inch, regardless of pack type. The Committee unanimously recommended these changes at its March 2, 2005, meeting. Currently, three tables are included under the pack regulation to designate sizes and list the size variances permitted for the different pack arrangements used in the industry. This rule consolidates the three tables into one table that lists size designations with applicable size variation tolerances for kiwifruit regardless of the pack or container type. This rule is expected to simplify requirements for the industry, reduce handler packing costs, increase grower returns, and increase flexibility in handler packing operations. Section 920.52 of the order authorizes the establishment of pack requirements. Section 920.302(a)(4) of the order’s regulations specifies pack requirements for fresh shipments of California kiwifruit. Pack requirements include the specific arrangement, size, weight, count, or grade of a quantity of kiwifruit in a particular type and size of container. Section 920.302 of the order’s regulations specifies grade, size, pack, and container regulations for the fresh shipment of California kiwifruit. This section contains three tables regarding VerDate jul<14>2003 16:02 Aug 19, 2005 Jkt 205001 pack. One table in § 920.302(a)(4)(iii) specifies size designations for kiwifruit packed in volume fill containers (such as bags or bulk containers). These size designations are based on the maximum number of pieces of fruit per 8-pound sample. Two tables in § 920.302 specify size variation tolerances. One table in § 920.302(a)(4)(ii)(B) is applicable to volume fill containers and lists size designations with the corresponding size variation tolerance listed by diameter. The other table in § 920.302(a)(4)(ii)(A) is applicable to kiwifruit packed in trays and lists the variation tolerance in diameter by count (number of pieces of kiwifruit packed in a tray). Since 1989, there have been two different size variation tolerances for Size 39 and Size 42 kiwifruit, depending on style of pack. The majority of Size 39 and Size 42 kiwifruit is initially packed in volume fill containers and must meet a size variation tolerance of 3⁄8-inch. It has become more common for some of the fruit to then be restyled (repacked) into trays. In fact, the current estimate is that 10 percent of the crop is restyled into trays. All kiwifruit restyled within the production area must be reinspected. Restyling fruit from volume fill containers into trays may require resizing the fruit because the size variation tolerance differs for the two containers. Fruit packed in trays that is 39 and 42 count must meet a size variation tolerance of 1⁄4-inch. In order to meet the more restrictive 1⁄4-inch tolerance, handlers must resize the fruit. Resizing is costly and slows down the restyling process. In addition, during the initial packing process, pack styles can change several times daily depending upon market demand. Resizing may also reduce returns to growers. Thus, the Committee recommended changing the size variation requirement for Size 39 and Size 42 kiwifruit from 1⁄4 inch to 3⁄8 inch when packed in cell compartments, cardboard fillers, or molded trays. The Committee also recommended revising the regulations to specify one standard size variation tolerance of 3⁄8inch for Size 39 and Size 42 kiwifruit, regardless of whether the fruit is packed in volume fill containers or trays. To facilitate this change the three tables under the pack regulation will be consolidated into one that lists both size designations and their applicable size variation tolerances for fruit packed in all container types. Additionally, clarifying language that was inadvertently omitted from under the first table (Count) in prior rulemaking will be restored. The language clarifies PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 that the average weight of all sample units in a lot must weigh at least 8 pounds, but no sample unit may be more than 4 ounces less than 8 pounds. This rule is expected to simplify requirements for the industry, reduce handler packing costs, increase grower returns, and increase flexibility in handler packing operations. Section 920.302 is revised accordingly. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small entity orientation and compatibility. There are approximately 45 handlers of California kiwifruit subject to regulation under the marketing order and approximately 275 growers in the production area. Small agricultural service firms are defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those whose annual receipts are less than $6,000,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $750,000. None of the 45 handlers subject to regulation have annual kiwifruit sales of at least $6,000,000. In addition, six growers subject to regulation have annual sales exceeding $750,000. Therefore, a majority of the kiwifruit handlers and growers may be classified as small entities. This rule relaxes the pack requirements currently specified in § 920.302 for kiwifruit. The rule creates one standard size variation tolerance to be applied uniformly to all container types. Additionally, the three tables currently under the pack regulation will be consolidated into one. By allowing handlers to utilize a single table for kiwifruit size designations and size variation tolerances, regardless of pack or container, this rule is expected to simplify requirements for the industry, reduce handler packing costs, increase grower returns, and increase flexibility in handler packing operations. Authority for this action is provided in § 920.52 of the order, which authorizes the establishment of pack requirements. E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM 22AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 161 / Monday, August 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations The impact of this change on handlers was discussed by the Committee. Approximately 10 percent of shipments are restyled from a volume fill container to a tray pack. Based on an industry survey, restyling costs an average of $.07 per tray equivalent. Since there will no longer be a need for handlers to resize the fruit when restyling from a volume fill container to a tray pack, it is estimated that restyling costs per tray equivalent will decrease to $.035 per tray equivalent. The average of Size 39 and 42 fruit sold over a 6-year period is approximately 22 percent of the crop. Current restyling costs are obtained by calculating 10 percent of the average of Size 39 and 42 fruit (22 percent of the total packout) and multiplying that number by the estimated cost per tray equivalent. Based on a total crop of 6 million tray equivalents (te) the cost savings for repacking/restyling will be around $9,000. This amount is obtained by subtracting $9,240 from $18,480 from the table below, which is the difference between the restyling costs incurred when fruit must be resized and restyling costs when fruit does not need to be resized. Total Crop Sold (te)—6,000,000 Total Size 39 & 42 fruit (22% of total crop) (te)—1,320,000 Estimated number of Size 39 & 42 fruit restyled annually from bulk to trays (10% of total 39/42’s packed) (te)— 132,000 Approximate cost to restyle Sizes 39 and 42 fruit without rechecking/ resizing for size variation difference (0.07 cents per te)—$9,240 Approximate cost to restyle Size 39 and 42 fruit that requires resize for size variation difference (0.14 cents per te)—$18,480 This change reduces packing costs since handlers will no longer need to resize fruit to the more restrictive 1⁄4inch tolerance in the restyling (repacking) process. The packing process will also move more rapidly since frequent resizing adjustments are no longer necessary. Fewer resizing adjustments may also mean increased returns to growers. The Committee considered the alternative of not revising the rule, but this was not considered viable because of the confusion currently experienced VerDate jul<14>2003 16:02 Aug 19, 2005 Jkt 205001 because of differences in the size variation tolerance in the different packs and the resulting increased packing costs. The Committee reasoned that the only viable alternative was to create a standard size variation tolerance regardless of pack. This rule creates one size variation standard that will be applied uniformly to all container types as well as consolidate the three tables currently in the pack regulation of the order into one table. Accordingly, these actions do not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large kiwifruit handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sectors. USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this final rule. In fact, this action will relax the current requirements under the U.S. Standards for Grade of Kiwifruit (7 CFR 51.2335 through 51.2340) issued under the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 through 1627) with regard to ‘‘fairly uniform in size.’’ In addition, the Committee’s meeting was widely publicized throughout the kiwifruit industry and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the March 2, 2005, meeting, was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were encouraged to express their views on these issues. A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal Register on June 22, 2005 (70 FR 36060). Copies of the rule were mailed or sent via facsimile to all Committee members and kiwifruit handlers. Finally, the rule was made available through the Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 20-day comment period ending July 12, 2005, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were received. A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/ PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 48841 fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because this rule should be in place by September 10, 2005, which is prior to the start of the new shipping season. This rule relaxes requirements currently in effect. Further, handlers are aware of this rule, which was recommended at a public meeting. Also, a 20-day comment period was provided for in the proposed rule and no comments were received. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 920 Kiwifruit, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. I For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 920 is amended as follows: PART 920—KIWIFRUIT GROWN IN CALIFORNIA 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 920 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 2. In § 920.302, paragraph (a)(4) is revised to read as follows: I § 920.302 Grade, size, pack, and container regulations. (a) * * * (4) Pack Requirements. (i) Kiwifruit packed in containers with cell compartments, cardboard fillers, or molded trays shall be of proper size for the cells, fillers, or molds in which they are packed. Such fruit shall be fairly uniform in size. (ii) (A) Kiwifruit packed in any container shall be subject to the size designation, maximum number of fruit per 8-pound sample, and the size variation tolerance specified as follows: E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM 22AUR1 48842 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 161 / Monday, August 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations SIZE DESIGNATION AND SIZE VARIATION CHART Column 2 maximum number of fruit per 8pound sample Column 1 size designation 18 or larger ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 23 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 25 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 27/28 ................................................................................................................................................................ 30 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 33 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 36 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 39 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 42 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 45 or smaller .................................................................................................................................................... (B) The average weight of all sample units in a lot must weigh at least 8 pounds, but no sample unit may be more than 4 ounces less than 8 pounds. (C) Not more than 10 percent, by count, of the containers in any lot and not more than 5 percent, by count, of kiwifruit in any container, (except that for Sizes 42 and 45 kiwifruit, the tolerance, by count, in any one container, may not be more than 25 percent) may fail to meet the size variation requirements of this paragraph. (iii) All volume fill containers of kiwifruit designated by weight shall hold 19.8-pounds (9-kilograms) net weight of kiwifruit unless such containers hold less than 15 pounds or more than 35 pounds net weight of kiwifruit. * * * * * Dated: August 17, 2005. Lloyd C. Day, Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 05–16571 Filed 8–19–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 12 CFR Part 229 [Regulation BB; Docket No. R–1225] Community Reinvestment Act; Correction Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. ACTION: Final rule; correction. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Board of Governors is correcting the Paperwork Reduction Act information that it provided in connection with a final rule amending certain provisions of Regulation BB, VerDate jul<14>2003 16:02 Aug 19, 2005 Jkt 205001 which was published in the Federal Register of August 2, 2005. DATES: The final rule is effective on September 1, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle E. Long, Federal Reserve Board Clearance Officer, 202–452–3829, Division of Research and Statistics. For users of Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) only, contact 202–263– 4869. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board published a final rule in the Federal Register of August 2, 2005 (70 FR 44256), that amended certain provisions of Regulation BB, effective September 1, 2005. The Paperwork Reduction Act section for this final rule included detailed information about the paperwork burden estimate for State Member Banks that are required to comply with the regulation. Inadvertently, the Board omitted from this Paperwork Reduction Act calculation the burden hours for a couple of optional requirements. This document corrects the error by revising the burden estimate on page 44265, in the second column, as follows: Board: Number of Respondents: 914. Estimated Time per Response: Small business and small farm loan register, 219 hours; consumer loan data, 326 hours; other loan data, 25 hours; assessment area delineation, 2 hours; small business and small farm loan data, 8 hours; community development loan data, 13 hours; HMDA out-of-MSA loan data, 253 hours; data on lending by a consortium or third party, 17 hours; affiliated lending data, 38 hours; request for designation as a wholesale or limited purpose bank, 4 hours; and public file, 10 hours. Total Estimated Annual Burden: 131,662 hours. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 25 27 30 32 35 39 43 46 49 53 55 Column 3 size variation tolerance (diameter) ⁄ -inch ⁄ -inch ⁄ -inch 1⁄2-inch 1⁄2-inch 1⁄2-inch 3⁄8-inch 3⁄8-inch 3⁄8-inch 3⁄8-inch 1⁄4-inch 12 12 12 (12.7 mm). (12.7 mm). (12.7 mm). (12.7 mm). (12.7 mm). (12.7 mm). (9.5 mm). (9.5 mm). (9.5 mm). (9.5 mm). (6.4 mm). By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 15, 2005. Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 05–16459 Filed 8–19–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 25 [Docket No. NM325; Special Conditions No. 25–294–SC] Special Conditions: Gulfstream Model G150 Airplanes; Side-Facing SingleOccupant Seats Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for Gulfstream Model G150 airplanes. These airplanes will have a novel or unusual design feature(s) associated with side-facing singleoccupant seats. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards. DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is August 9, 2005. Comments must be received on or before October 6, 2005. ADDRESSES: Comments on these special conditions may be mailed in duplicate to: Federal Aviation Administration, Transport Airplane Directorate, Attn: Rules Docket (ANM–113), Docket No. E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM 22AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 161 (Monday, August 22, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48839-48842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16571]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 920

[Docket No. FV05-920-1 FR]


Kiwifruit Grown in California; Relaxation of Pack Requirements

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule revises the pack requirements for California 
kiwifruit under the California kiwifruit marketing order (order). The 
order regulates the handling of kiwifruit grown in California and is 
administered locally by the Kiwifruit Administrative Committee 
(Committee). This rule requires that kiwifruit marked as Size 39 or 42 
not vary in diameter by more than \3/8\ inch, regardless of pack type. 
In addition, the three tables that are currently under the pack 
regulation will be consolidated into one. By allowing handlers to 
utilize a single table for kiwifruit size designations and size 
variation tolerances regardless of pack or container, this rule is 
expected to simplify requirements for the industry, reduce handler 
packing costs, increase grower returns, and increase flexibility in 
handler packing operations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 23, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shereen Marino, Marketing Specialist, 
California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration 
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-
5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, 
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 
20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938.
    Small businesses may request information on complying with this 
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration 
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence 
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing 
Order No. 920 as amended (7 CFR part 920), regulating the handling of 
kiwifruit grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the 
``order.'' The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing 
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter 
referred to as the ``Act.''
    The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in

[[Page 48840]]

conformance with Executive Order 12866.
    This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
rule.
    The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition 
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation 
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and 
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A 
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. 
After the hearing USDA will rule on the petition. The Act provides that 
the district court of the United States in any district in which the 
handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of 
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, 
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of 
the entry of the ruling.
    This rule revises the pack requirements for California kiwifruit 
under the order. This rule requires that Size 39 and Size 42 fruit not 
vary in size by more than \3/8\ inch, regardless of pack type. The 
Committee unanimously recommended these changes at its March 2, 2005, 
meeting.
    Currently, three tables are included under the pack regulation to 
designate sizes and list the size variances permitted for the different 
pack arrangements used in the industry. This rule consolidates the 
three tables into one table that lists size designations with 
applicable size variation tolerances for kiwifruit regardless of the 
pack or container type. This rule is expected to simplify requirements 
for the industry, reduce handler packing costs, increase grower 
returns, and increase flexibility in handler packing operations.
    Section 920.52 of the order authorizes the establishment of pack 
requirements. Section 920.302(a)(4) of the order's regulations 
specifies pack requirements for fresh shipments of California 
kiwifruit. Pack requirements include the specific arrangement, size, 
weight, count, or grade of a quantity of kiwifruit in a particular type 
and size of container.
    Section 920.302 of the order's regulations specifies grade, size, 
pack, and container regulations for the fresh shipment of California 
kiwifruit. This section contains three tables regarding pack. One table 
in Sec.  920.302(a)(4)(iii) specifies size designations for kiwifruit 
packed in volume fill containers (such as bags or bulk containers). 
These size designations are based on the maximum number of pieces of 
fruit per 8-pound sample. Two tables in Sec.  920.302 specify size 
variation tolerances. One table in Sec.  920.302(a)(4)(ii)(B) is 
applicable to volume fill containers and lists size designations with 
the corresponding size variation tolerance listed by diameter. The 
other table in Sec.  920.302(a)(4)(ii)(A) is applicable to kiwifruit 
packed in trays and lists the variation tolerance in diameter by count 
(number of pieces of kiwifruit packed in a tray).
    Since 1989, there have been two different size variation tolerances 
for Size 39 and Size 42 kiwifruit, depending on style of pack. The 
majority of Size 39 and Size 42 kiwifruit is initially packed in volume 
fill containers and must meet a size variation tolerance of \3/8\-inch. 
It has become more common for some of the fruit to then be restyled 
(repacked) into trays. In fact, the current estimate is that 10 percent 
of the crop is restyled into trays. All kiwifruit restyled within the 
production area must be reinspected.
    Restyling fruit from volume fill containers into trays may require 
resizing the fruit because the size variation tolerance differs for the 
two containers. Fruit packed in trays that is 39 and 42 count must meet 
a size variation tolerance of \1/4\-inch. In order to meet the more 
restrictive \1/4\-inch tolerance, handlers must resize the fruit. 
Resizing is costly and slows down the restyling process. In addition, 
during the initial packing process, pack styles can change several 
times daily depending upon market demand. Resizing may also reduce 
returns to growers. Thus, the Committee recommended changing the size 
variation requirement for Size 39 and Size 42 kiwifruit from \1/4\ inch 
to \3/8\ inch when packed in cell compartments, cardboard fillers, or 
molded trays.
    The Committee also recommended revising the regulations to specify 
one standard size variation tolerance of \3/8\-inch for Size 39 and 
Size 42 kiwifruit, regardless of whether the fruit is packed in volume 
fill containers or trays. To facilitate this change the three tables 
under the pack regulation will be consolidated into one that lists both 
size designations and their applicable size variation tolerances for 
fruit packed in all container types. Additionally, clarifying language 
that was inadvertently omitted from under the first table (Count) in 
prior rulemaking will be restored. The language clarifies that the 
average weight of all sample units in a lot must weigh at least 8 
pounds, but no sample unit may be more than 4 ounces less than 8 
pounds. This rule is expected to simplify requirements for the 
industry, reduce handler packing costs, increase grower returns, and 
increase flexibility in handler packing operations. Section 920.302 is 
revised accordingly.

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
entity orientation and compatibility.
    There are approximately 45 handlers of California kiwifruit subject 
to regulation under the marketing order and approximately 275 growers 
in the production area. Small agricultural service firms are defined by 
the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those whose 
annual receipts are less than $6,000,000, and small agricultural 
producers are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than 
$750,000. None of the 45 handlers subject to regulation have annual 
kiwifruit sales of at least $6,000,000. In addition, six growers 
subject to regulation have annual sales exceeding $750,000. Therefore, 
a majority of the kiwifruit handlers and growers may be classified as 
small entities.
    This rule relaxes the pack requirements currently specified in 
Sec.  920.302 for kiwifruit. The rule creates one standard size 
variation tolerance to be applied uniformly to all container types. 
Additionally, the three tables currently under the pack regulation will 
be consolidated into one. By allowing handlers to utilize a single 
table for kiwifruit size designations and size variation tolerances, 
regardless of pack or container, this rule is expected to simplify 
requirements for the industry, reduce handler packing costs, increase 
grower returns, and increase flexibility in handler packing operations. 
Authority for this action is provided in Sec.  920.52 of the order, 
which authorizes the establishment of pack requirements.

[[Page 48841]]

    The impact of this change on handlers was discussed by the 
Committee. Approximately 10 percent of shipments are restyled from a 
volume fill container to a tray pack. Based on an industry survey, 
restyling costs an average of $.07 per tray equivalent. Since there 
will no longer be a need for handlers to resize the fruit when 
restyling from a volume fill container to a tray pack, it is estimated 
that restyling costs per tray equivalent will decrease to $.035 per 
tray equivalent. The average of Size 39 and 42 fruit sold over a 6-year 
period is approximately 22 percent of the crop. Current restyling costs 
are obtained by calculating 10 percent of the average of Size 39 and 42 
fruit (22 percent of the total packout) and multiplying that number by 
the estimated cost per tray equivalent.
    Based on a total crop of 6 million tray equivalents (te) the cost 
savings for repacking/restyling will be around $9,000. This amount is 
obtained by subtracting $9,240 from $18,480 from the table below, which 
is the difference between the restyling costs incurred when fruit must 
be resized and restyling costs when fruit does not need to be resized.

Total Crop Sold (te)--6,000,000
Total Size 39 & 42 fruit (22% of total crop) (te)--1,320,000
Estimated number of Size 39 & 42 fruit restyled annually from bulk to 
trays (10% of total 39/42's packed) (te)--132,000
Approximate cost to restyle Sizes 39 and 42 fruit without rechecking/
resizing for size variation difference (0.07 cents per te)--$9,240
Approximate cost to restyle Size 39 and 42 fruit that requires resize 
for size variation difference (0.14 cents per te)--$18,480

    This change reduces packing costs since handlers will no longer 
need to resize fruit to the more restrictive \1/4\-inch tolerance in 
the restyling (repacking) process. The packing process will also move 
more rapidly since frequent resizing adjustments are no longer 
necessary. Fewer resizing adjustments may also mean increased returns 
to growers.
    The Committee considered the alternative of not revising the rule, 
but this was not considered viable because of the confusion currently 
experienced because of differences in the size variation tolerance in 
the different packs and the resulting increased packing costs. The 
Committee reasoned that the only viable alternative was to create a 
standard size variation tolerance regardless of pack.
    This rule creates one size variation standard that will be applied 
uniformly to all container types as well as consolidate the three 
tables currently in the pack regulation of the order into one table. 
Accordingly, these actions do not impose any additional reporting or 
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large kiwifruit handlers. 
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are 
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and 
duplication by industry and public sectors.
    USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, 
overlap, or conflict with this final rule. In fact, this action will 
relax the current requirements under the U.S. Standards for Grade of 
Kiwifruit (7 CFR 51.2335 through 51.2340) issued under the Agricultural 
Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 through 1627) with regard to 
``fairly uniform in size.''
    In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized 
throughout the kiwifruit industry and all interested persons were 
invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee 
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the March 2, 
2005, meeting, was a public meeting and all entities, both large and 
small, were encouraged to express their views on these issues.
    A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal 
Register on June 22, 2005 (70 FR 36060). Copies of the rule were mailed 
or sent via facsimile to all Committee members and kiwifruit handlers. 
Finally, the rule was made available through the Internet by USDA and 
the Office of the Federal Register. A 20-day comment period ending July 
12, 2005, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the 
proposal. No comments were received.
    A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and 
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance 
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address 
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the 
information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other 
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 
the Act.
    It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the 
effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the 
Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because this rule should be in place by 
September 10, 2005, which is prior to the start of the new shipping 
season. This rule relaxes requirements currently in effect. Further, 
handlers are aware of this rule, which was recommended at a public 
meeting. Also, a 20-day comment period was provided for in the proposed 
rule and no comments were received.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 920

    Kiwifruit, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 920 is amended as 
follows:

PART 920--KIWIFRUIT GROWN IN CALIFORNIA

0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 920 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.

0
2. In Sec.  920.302, paragraph (a)(4) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  920.302  Grade, size, pack, and container regulations.

    (a) * * *
    (4) Pack Requirements. (i) Kiwifruit packed in containers with cell 
compartments, cardboard fillers, or molded trays shall be of proper 
size for the cells, fillers, or molds in which they are packed. Such 
fruit shall be fairly uniform in size.
    (ii) (A) Kiwifruit packed in any container shall be subject to the 
size designation, maximum number of fruit per 8-pound sample, and the 
size variation tolerance specified as follows:

[[Page 48842]]



                Size Designation and Size Variation Chart
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Column 2
                                  maximum
                                 number of     Column 3 size variation
   Column 1 size designation    fruit per 8-     tolerance (diameter)
                                   pound
                                   sample
------------------------------------------------------------------------
18 or larger..................           25  \1/2\-inch (12.7 mm).
20............................           27  \1/2\-inch (12.7 mm).
23............................           30  \1/2\-inch (12.7 mm).
25............................           32  \1/2\-inch (12.7 mm).
27/28.........................           35  \1/2\-inch (12.7 mm).
30............................           39  \1/2\-inch (12.7 mm).
33............................           43  \3/8\-inch (9.5 mm).
36............................           46  \3/8\-inch (9.5 mm).
39............................           49  \3/8\-inch (9.5 mm).
42............................           53  \3/8\-inch (9.5 mm).
45 or smaller.................           55  \1/4\-inch (6.4 mm).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (B) The average weight of all sample units in a lot must weigh at 
least 8 pounds, but no sample unit may be more than 4 ounces less than 
8 pounds.
    (C) Not more than 10 percent, by count, of the containers in any 
lot and not more than 5 percent, by count, of kiwifruit in any 
container, (except that for Sizes 42 and 45 kiwifruit, the tolerance, 
by count, in any one container, may not be more than 25 percent) may 
fail to meet the size variation requirements of this paragraph.
    (iii) All volume fill containers of kiwifruit designated by weight 
shall hold 19.8-pounds (9-kilograms) net weight of kiwifruit unless 
such containers hold less than 15 pounds or more than 35 pounds net 
weight of kiwifruit.
* * * * *

    Dated: August 17, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-16571 Filed 8-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.