Kiwifruit Grown in California; Relaxation of Pack Requirements, 48839-48842 [05-16571]
Download as PDF
48839
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 161
Monday, August 22, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Review
This rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with Executive Order 12866.
5 CFR Parts 841, 842, and 843
RIN 3206–AK57
Federal Employees’ Retirement
System; Death Benefits and Employee
Refunds
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is issuing Final
rules that revise the table of reduction
factors for early commencing dates of
survivor annuities for spouses of
separated employees who die before the
date on which they would be eligible for
unreduced deferred annuities, and to
revise the annuity factor for spouses of
deceased employees who die in service
when those spouses elect to receive the
basic employee death benefit in 36
installments under the Federal
Employees’ Retirement System (FERS)
Act of 1986. These rules are necessary
to conform the tables to the previously
published economic assumptions
adopted by the Board of Actuaries.
DATES: This final rule is effective
October 1, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karla Yeakle, (202) 606–0299.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 1, 2004, we published (at 69
FR 69805) interim regulations to revise
the normal cost percentage under the
Federal Employees’ Retirement System
(FERS) Act of 1986, Public Law 99–335,
100 Stat. 514, based on changed
economic assumptions and
demographic factors adopted by the
Board of Actuaries of the Civil Service
Retirement System. Those changed
economic assumptions (principally the
change in expected investment return
from 6.75 percent to 6.25 percent)
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:02 Aug 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
require corresponding changes in factors
used to produce actuarially equivalent
benefits when required by the FERS Act.
The revised factors were effective on
October 1, 2004. To implement these
changes in factors, we issued interim
regulations on December 1, 2004. At
that time we also requested comments
on the interim regulations. We received
no comments. Accordingly we are now
adopting the interim regulation as final
without change.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because the regulation will only affect
retirement payments to retired
employees, spouses, and former
spouses.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 841, 842
and 843
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air traffic controllers,
Alimony, Claims, Disability benefits,
Firefighters, Government employees,
Income taxes, Intergovernmental
relations, Law enforcement officers,
Pensions, Retirement.
Office of Personnel Management.
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
Accordingly, the Office of Personnel
Management adopts its interim
regulations amending 5 CFR parts 841,
842, and 843 published at 69 FR 69805
on December 1, 2004, as final rule
without change.
I
[FR Doc. 05–16592 Filed 8–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 920
[Docket No. FV05–920–1 FR]
Kiwifruit Grown in California;
Relaxation of Pack Requirements
AGENCY:
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: This rule revises the pack
requirements for California kiwifruit
under the California kiwifruit marketing
order (order). The order regulates the
handling of kiwifruit grown in
California and is administered locally
by the Kiwifruit Administrative
Committee (Committee). This rule
requires that kiwifruit marked as Size 39
or 42 not vary in diameter by more than
3⁄8 inch, regardless of pack type. In
addition, the three tables that are
currently under the pack regulation will
be consolidated into one. By allowing
handlers to utilize a single table for
kiwifruit size designations and size
variation tolerances regardless of pack
or container, this rule is expected to
simplify requirements for the industry,
reduce handler packing costs, increase
grower returns, and increase flexibility
in handler packing operations.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 23, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shereen Marino, Marketing Specialist,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906; or George
Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This final
rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 920 as amended (7 CFR part 920),
regulating the handling of kiwifruit
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
48840
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 161 / Monday, August 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
will rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule revises the pack
requirements for California kiwifruit
under the order. This rule requires that
Size 39 and Size 42 fruit not vary in size
by more than 3⁄8 inch, regardless of pack
type. The Committee unanimously
recommended these changes at its
March 2, 2005, meeting.
Currently, three tables are included
under the pack regulation to designate
sizes and list the size variances
permitted for the different pack
arrangements used in the industry. This
rule consolidates the three tables into
one table that lists size designations
with applicable size variation tolerances
for kiwifruit regardless of the pack or
container type. This rule is expected to
simplify requirements for the industry,
reduce handler packing costs, increase
grower returns, and increase flexibility
in handler packing operations.
Section 920.52 of the order authorizes
the establishment of pack requirements.
Section 920.302(a)(4) of the order’s
regulations specifies pack requirements
for fresh shipments of California
kiwifruit. Pack requirements include the
specific arrangement, size, weight,
count, or grade of a quantity of kiwifruit
in a particular type and size of
container.
Section 920.302 of the order’s
regulations specifies grade, size, pack,
and container regulations for the fresh
shipment of California kiwifruit. This
section contains three tables regarding
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:02 Aug 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
pack. One table in § 920.302(a)(4)(iii)
specifies size designations for kiwifruit
packed in volume fill containers (such
as bags or bulk containers). These size
designations are based on the maximum
number of pieces of fruit per 8-pound
sample. Two tables in § 920.302 specify
size variation tolerances. One table in
§ 920.302(a)(4)(ii)(B) is applicable to
volume fill containers and lists size
designations with the corresponding
size variation tolerance listed by
diameter. The other table in
§ 920.302(a)(4)(ii)(A) is applicable to
kiwifruit packed in trays and lists the
variation tolerance in diameter by count
(number of pieces of kiwifruit packed in
a tray).
Since 1989, there have been two
different size variation tolerances for
Size 39 and Size 42 kiwifruit,
depending on style of pack. The
majority of Size 39 and Size 42 kiwifruit
is initially packed in volume fill
containers and must meet a size
variation tolerance of 3⁄8-inch. It has
become more common for some of the
fruit to then be restyled (repacked) into
trays. In fact, the current estimate is that
10 percent of the crop is restyled into
trays. All kiwifruit restyled within the
production area must be reinspected.
Restyling fruit from volume fill
containers into trays may require
resizing the fruit because the size
variation tolerance differs for the two
containers. Fruit packed in trays that is
39 and 42 count must meet a size
variation tolerance of 1⁄4-inch. In order
to meet the more restrictive 1⁄4-inch
tolerance, handlers must resize the fruit.
Resizing is costly and slows down the
restyling process. In addition, during
the initial packing process, pack styles
can change several times daily
depending upon market demand.
Resizing may also reduce returns to
growers. Thus, the Committee
recommended changing the size
variation requirement for Size 39 and
Size 42 kiwifruit from 1⁄4 inch to 3⁄8 inch
when packed in cell compartments,
cardboard fillers, or molded trays.
The Committee also recommended
revising the regulations to specify one
standard size variation tolerance of 3⁄8inch for Size 39 and Size 42 kiwifruit,
regardless of whether the fruit is packed
in volume fill containers or trays. To
facilitate this change the three tables
under the pack regulation will be
consolidated into one that lists both size
designations and their applicable size
variation tolerances for fruit packed in
all container types. Additionally,
clarifying language that was
inadvertently omitted from under the
first table (Count) in prior rulemaking
will be restored. The language clarifies
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that the average weight of all sample
units in a lot must weigh at least 8
pounds, but no sample unit may be
more than 4 ounces less than 8 pounds.
This rule is expected to simplify
requirements for the industry, reduce
handler packing costs, increase grower
returns, and increase flexibility in
handler packing operations. Section
920.302 is revised accordingly.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 45 handlers
of California kiwifruit subject to
regulation under the marketing order
and approximately 275 growers in the
production area. Small agricultural
service firms are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those whose annual receipts
are less than $6,000,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $750,000. None of the 45 handlers
subject to regulation have annual
kiwifruit sales of at least $6,000,000. In
addition, six growers subject to
regulation have annual sales exceeding
$750,000. Therefore, a majority of the
kiwifruit handlers and growers may be
classified as small entities.
This rule relaxes the pack
requirements currently specified in
§ 920.302 for kiwifruit. The rule creates
one standard size variation tolerance to
be applied uniformly to all container
types. Additionally, the three tables
currently under the pack regulation will
be consolidated into one. By allowing
handlers to utilize a single table for
kiwifruit size designations and size
variation tolerances, regardless of pack
or container, this rule is expected to
simplify requirements for the industry,
reduce handler packing costs, increase
grower returns, and increase flexibility
in handler packing operations.
Authority for this action is provided in
§ 920.52 of the order, which authorizes
the establishment of pack requirements.
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 161 / Monday, August 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
The impact of this change on handlers
was discussed by the Committee.
Approximately 10 percent of shipments
are restyled from a volume fill container
to a tray pack. Based on an industry
survey, restyling costs an average of $.07
per tray equivalent. Since there will no
longer be a need for handlers to resize
the fruit when restyling from a volume
fill container to a tray pack, it is
estimated that restyling costs per tray
equivalent will decrease to $.035 per
tray equivalent. The average of Size 39
and 42 fruit sold over a 6-year period is
approximately 22 percent of the crop.
Current restyling costs are obtained by
calculating 10 percent of the average of
Size 39 and 42 fruit (22 percent of the
total packout) and multiplying that
number by the estimated cost per tray
equivalent.
Based on a total crop of 6 million tray
equivalents (te) the cost savings for
repacking/restyling will be around
$9,000. This amount is obtained by
subtracting $9,240 from $18,480 from
the table below, which is the difference
between the restyling costs incurred
when fruit must be resized and restyling
costs when fruit does not need to be
resized.
Total Crop Sold (te)—6,000,000
Total Size 39 & 42 fruit (22% of total
crop) (te)—1,320,000
Estimated number of Size 39 & 42 fruit
restyled annually from bulk to trays
(10% of total 39/42’s packed) (te)—
132,000
Approximate cost to restyle Sizes 39
and 42 fruit without rechecking/
resizing for size variation difference
(0.07 cents per te)—$9,240
Approximate cost to restyle Size 39 and
42 fruit that requires resize for size
variation difference (0.14 cents per
te)—$18,480
This change reduces packing costs
since handlers will no longer need to
resize fruit to the more restrictive 1⁄4inch tolerance in the restyling
(repacking) process. The packing
process will also move more rapidly
since frequent resizing adjustments are
no longer necessary. Fewer resizing
adjustments may also mean increased
returns to growers.
The Committee considered the
alternative of not revising the rule, but
this was not considered viable because
of the confusion currently experienced
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:02 Aug 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
because of differences in the size
variation tolerance in the different packs
and the resulting increased packing
costs. The Committee reasoned that the
only viable alternative was to create a
standard size variation tolerance
regardless of pack.
This rule creates one size variation
standard that will be applied uniformly
to all container types as well as
consolidate the three tables currently in
the pack regulation of the order into one
table. Accordingly, these actions do not
impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large kiwifruit handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sectors.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this final rule. In fact, this
action will relax the current
requirements under the U.S. Standards
for Grade of Kiwifruit (7 CFR 51.2335
through 51.2340) issued under the
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7
U.S.C. 1621 through 1627) with regard
to ‘‘fairly uniform in size.’’
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
kiwifruit industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all
Committee meetings, the March 2, 2005,
meeting, was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were
encouraged to express their views on
these issues.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on June 22, 2005 (70 FR 36060).
Copies of the rule were mailed or sent
via facsimile to all Committee members
and kiwifruit handlers. Finally, the rule
was made available through the Internet
by USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 20-day comment period
ending July 12, 2005, was provided to
allow interested persons to respond to
the proposal. No comments were
received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48841
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
matter presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because this rule should be
in place by September 10, 2005, which
is prior to the start of the new shipping
season. This rule relaxes requirements
currently in effect. Further, handlers are
aware of this rule, which was
recommended at a public meeting. Also,
a 20-day comment period was provided
for in the proposed rule and no
comments were received.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 920
Kiwifruit, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 920 is amended as
follows:
PART 920—KIWIFRUIT GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part
920 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 920.302, paragraph (a)(4) is
revised to read as follows:
I
§ 920.302 Grade, size, pack, and container
regulations.
(a) * * *
(4) Pack Requirements. (i) Kiwifruit
packed in containers with cell
compartments, cardboard fillers, or
molded trays shall be of proper size for
the cells, fillers, or molds in which they
are packed. Such fruit shall be fairly
uniform in size.
(ii) (A) Kiwifruit packed in any
container shall be subject to the size
designation, maximum number of fruit
per 8-pound sample, and the size
variation tolerance specified as follows:
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
48842
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 161 / Monday, August 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
SIZE DESIGNATION AND SIZE VARIATION CHART
Column 2
maximum
number of
fruit per 8pound sample
Column 1 size designation
18 or larger ......................................................................................................................................................
20 .....................................................................................................................................................................
23 .....................................................................................................................................................................
25 .....................................................................................................................................................................
27/28 ................................................................................................................................................................
30 .....................................................................................................................................................................
33 .....................................................................................................................................................................
36 .....................................................................................................................................................................
39 .....................................................................................................................................................................
42 .....................................................................................................................................................................
45 or smaller ....................................................................................................................................................
(B) The average weight of all sample
units in a lot must weigh at least 8
pounds, but no sample unit may be
more than 4 ounces less than 8 pounds.
(C) Not more than 10 percent, by
count, of the containers in any lot and
not more than 5 percent, by count, of
kiwifruit in any container, (except that
for Sizes 42 and 45 kiwifruit, the
tolerance, by count, in any one
container, may not be more than 25
percent) may fail to meet the size
variation requirements of this
paragraph.
(iii) All volume fill containers of
kiwifruit designated by weight shall
hold 19.8-pounds (9-kilograms) net
weight of kiwifruit unless such
containers hold less than 15 pounds or
more than 35 pounds net weight of
kiwifruit.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 17, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–16571 Filed 8–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 229
[Regulation BB; Docket No. R–1225]
Community Reinvestment Act;
Correction
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Board of Governors is
correcting the Paperwork Reduction Act
information that it provided in
connection with a final rule amending
certain provisions of Regulation BB,
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:02 Aug 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
which was published in the Federal
Register of August 2, 2005.
DATES: The final rule is effective on
September 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle E. Long, Federal Reserve Board
Clearance Officer, 202–452–3829,
Division of Research and Statistics. For
users of Telecommunications Device for
the Deaf (TDD) only, contact 202–263–
4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board
published a final rule in the Federal
Register of August 2, 2005 (70 FR
44256), that amended certain provisions
of Regulation BB, effective September 1,
2005. The Paperwork Reduction Act
section for this final rule included
detailed information about the
paperwork burden estimate for State
Member Banks that are required to
comply with the regulation.
Inadvertently, the Board omitted from
this Paperwork Reduction Act
calculation the burden hours for a
couple of optional requirements. This
document corrects the error by revising
the burden estimate on page 44265, in
the second column, as follows:
Board:
Number of Respondents: 914.
Estimated Time per Response: Small
business and small farm loan register,
219 hours; consumer loan data, 326
hours; other loan data, 25 hours;
assessment area delineation, 2 hours;
small business and small farm loan data,
8 hours; community development loan
data, 13 hours; HMDA out-of-MSA loan
data, 253 hours; data on lending by a
consortium or third party, 17 hours;
affiliated lending data, 38 hours; request
for designation as a wholesale or limited
purpose bank, 4 hours; and public file,
10 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
131,662 hours.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
25
27
30
32
35
39
43
46
49
53
55
Column 3 size variation tolerance (diameter)
⁄ -inch
⁄ -inch
⁄ -inch
1⁄2-inch
1⁄2-inch
1⁄2-inch
3⁄8-inch
3⁄8-inch
3⁄8-inch
3⁄8-inch
1⁄4-inch
12
12
12
(12.7 mm).
(12.7 mm).
(12.7 mm).
(12.7 mm).
(12.7 mm).
(12.7 mm).
(9.5 mm).
(9.5 mm).
(9.5 mm).
(9.5 mm).
(6.4 mm).
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, August 15, 2005.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05–16459 Filed 8–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM325; Special Conditions No.
25–294–SC]
Special Conditions: Gulfstream Model
G150 Airplanes; Side-Facing SingleOccupant Seats
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for Gulfstream Model G150
airplanes. These airplanes will have a
novel or unusual design feature(s)
associated with side-facing singleoccupant seats. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is August 9, 2005.
Comments must be received on or
before October 6, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments on these special
conditions may be mailed in duplicate
to: Federal Aviation Administration,
Transport Airplane Directorate, Attn:
Rules Docket (ANM–113), Docket No.
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 161 (Monday, August 22, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48839-48842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16571]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 920
[Docket No. FV05-920-1 FR]
Kiwifruit Grown in California; Relaxation of Pack Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule revises the pack requirements for California
kiwifruit under the California kiwifruit marketing order (order). The
order regulates the handling of kiwifruit grown in California and is
administered locally by the Kiwifruit Administrative Committee
(Committee). This rule requires that kiwifruit marked as Size 39 or 42
not vary in diameter by more than \3/8\ inch, regardless of pack type.
In addition, the three tables that are currently under the pack
regulation will be consolidated into one. By allowing handlers to
utilize a single table for kiwifruit size designations and size
variation tolerances regardless of pack or container, this rule is
expected to simplify requirements for the industry, reduce handler
packing costs, increase grower returns, and increase flexibility in
handler packing operations.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 23, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shereen Marino, Marketing Specialist,
California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-
5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing
Order No. 920 as amended (7 CFR part 920), regulating the handling of
kiwifruit grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the
``order.'' The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter
referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
[[Page 48840]]
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA will rule on the petition. The Act provides that
the district court of the United States in any district in which the
handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule revises the pack requirements for California kiwifruit
under the order. This rule requires that Size 39 and Size 42 fruit not
vary in size by more than \3/8\ inch, regardless of pack type. The
Committee unanimously recommended these changes at its March 2, 2005,
meeting.
Currently, three tables are included under the pack regulation to
designate sizes and list the size variances permitted for the different
pack arrangements used in the industry. This rule consolidates the
three tables into one table that lists size designations with
applicable size variation tolerances for kiwifruit regardless of the
pack or container type. This rule is expected to simplify requirements
for the industry, reduce handler packing costs, increase grower
returns, and increase flexibility in handler packing operations.
Section 920.52 of the order authorizes the establishment of pack
requirements. Section 920.302(a)(4) of the order's regulations
specifies pack requirements for fresh shipments of California
kiwifruit. Pack requirements include the specific arrangement, size,
weight, count, or grade of a quantity of kiwifruit in a particular type
and size of container.
Section 920.302 of the order's regulations specifies grade, size,
pack, and container regulations for the fresh shipment of California
kiwifruit. This section contains three tables regarding pack. One table
in Sec. 920.302(a)(4)(iii) specifies size designations for kiwifruit
packed in volume fill containers (such as bags or bulk containers).
These size designations are based on the maximum number of pieces of
fruit per 8-pound sample. Two tables in Sec. 920.302 specify size
variation tolerances. One table in Sec. 920.302(a)(4)(ii)(B) is
applicable to volume fill containers and lists size designations with
the corresponding size variation tolerance listed by diameter. The
other table in Sec. 920.302(a)(4)(ii)(A) is applicable to kiwifruit
packed in trays and lists the variation tolerance in diameter by count
(number of pieces of kiwifruit packed in a tray).
Since 1989, there have been two different size variation tolerances
for Size 39 and Size 42 kiwifruit, depending on style of pack. The
majority of Size 39 and Size 42 kiwifruit is initially packed in volume
fill containers and must meet a size variation tolerance of \3/8\-inch.
It has become more common for some of the fruit to then be restyled
(repacked) into trays. In fact, the current estimate is that 10 percent
of the crop is restyled into trays. All kiwifruit restyled within the
production area must be reinspected.
Restyling fruit from volume fill containers into trays may require
resizing the fruit because the size variation tolerance differs for the
two containers. Fruit packed in trays that is 39 and 42 count must meet
a size variation tolerance of \1/4\-inch. In order to meet the more
restrictive \1/4\-inch tolerance, handlers must resize the fruit.
Resizing is costly and slows down the restyling process. In addition,
during the initial packing process, pack styles can change several
times daily depending upon market demand. Resizing may also reduce
returns to growers. Thus, the Committee recommended changing the size
variation requirement for Size 39 and Size 42 kiwifruit from \1/4\ inch
to \3/8\ inch when packed in cell compartments, cardboard fillers, or
molded trays.
The Committee also recommended revising the regulations to specify
one standard size variation tolerance of \3/8\-inch for Size 39 and
Size 42 kiwifruit, regardless of whether the fruit is packed in volume
fill containers or trays. To facilitate this change the three tables
under the pack regulation will be consolidated into one that lists both
size designations and their applicable size variation tolerances for
fruit packed in all container types. Additionally, clarifying language
that was inadvertently omitted from under the first table (Count) in
prior rulemaking will be restored. The language clarifies that the
average weight of all sample units in a lot must weigh at least 8
pounds, but no sample unit may be more than 4 ounces less than 8
pounds. This rule is expected to simplify requirements for the
industry, reduce handler packing costs, increase grower returns, and
increase flexibility in handler packing operations. Section 920.302 is
revised accordingly.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 45 handlers of California kiwifruit subject
to regulation under the marketing order and approximately 275 growers
in the production area. Small agricultural service firms are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those whose
annual receipts are less than $6,000,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$750,000. None of the 45 handlers subject to regulation have annual
kiwifruit sales of at least $6,000,000. In addition, six growers
subject to regulation have annual sales exceeding $750,000. Therefore,
a majority of the kiwifruit handlers and growers may be classified as
small entities.
This rule relaxes the pack requirements currently specified in
Sec. 920.302 for kiwifruit. The rule creates one standard size
variation tolerance to be applied uniformly to all container types.
Additionally, the three tables currently under the pack regulation will
be consolidated into one. By allowing handlers to utilize a single
table for kiwifruit size designations and size variation tolerances,
regardless of pack or container, this rule is expected to simplify
requirements for the industry, reduce handler packing costs, increase
grower returns, and increase flexibility in handler packing operations.
Authority for this action is provided in Sec. 920.52 of the order,
which authorizes the establishment of pack requirements.
[[Page 48841]]
The impact of this change on handlers was discussed by the
Committee. Approximately 10 percent of shipments are restyled from a
volume fill container to a tray pack. Based on an industry survey,
restyling costs an average of $.07 per tray equivalent. Since there
will no longer be a need for handlers to resize the fruit when
restyling from a volume fill container to a tray pack, it is estimated
that restyling costs per tray equivalent will decrease to $.035 per
tray equivalent. The average of Size 39 and 42 fruit sold over a 6-year
period is approximately 22 percent of the crop. Current restyling costs
are obtained by calculating 10 percent of the average of Size 39 and 42
fruit (22 percent of the total packout) and multiplying that number by
the estimated cost per tray equivalent.
Based on a total crop of 6 million tray equivalents (te) the cost
savings for repacking/restyling will be around $9,000. This amount is
obtained by subtracting $9,240 from $18,480 from the table below, which
is the difference between the restyling costs incurred when fruit must
be resized and restyling costs when fruit does not need to be resized.
Total Crop Sold (te)--6,000,000
Total Size 39 & 42 fruit (22% of total crop) (te)--1,320,000
Estimated number of Size 39 & 42 fruit restyled annually from bulk to
trays (10% of total 39/42's packed) (te)--132,000
Approximate cost to restyle Sizes 39 and 42 fruit without rechecking/
resizing for size variation difference (0.07 cents per te)--$9,240
Approximate cost to restyle Size 39 and 42 fruit that requires resize
for size variation difference (0.14 cents per te)--$18,480
This change reduces packing costs since handlers will no longer
need to resize fruit to the more restrictive \1/4\-inch tolerance in
the restyling (repacking) process. The packing process will also move
more rapidly since frequent resizing adjustments are no longer
necessary. Fewer resizing adjustments may also mean increased returns
to growers.
The Committee considered the alternative of not revising the rule,
but this was not considered viable because of the confusion currently
experienced because of differences in the size variation tolerance in
the different packs and the resulting increased packing costs. The
Committee reasoned that the only viable alternative was to create a
standard size variation tolerance regardless of pack.
This rule creates one size variation standard that will be applied
uniformly to all container types as well as consolidate the three
tables currently in the pack regulation of the order into one table.
Accordingly, these actions do not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large kiwifruit handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sectors.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this final rule. In fact, this action will
relax the current requirements under the U.S. Standards for Grade of
Kiwifruit (7 CFR 51.2335 through 51.2340) issued under the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 through 1627) with regard to
``fairly uniform in size.''
In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the kiwifruit industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the March 2,
2005, meeting, was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were encouraged to express their views on these issues.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on June 22, 2005 (70 FR 36060). Copies of the rule were mailed
or sent via facsimile to all Committee members and kiwifruit handlers.
Finally, the rule was made available through the Internet by USDA and
the Office of the Federal Register. A 20-day comment period ending July
12, 2005, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the
proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the
information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the
effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because this rule should be in place by
September 10, 2005, which is prior to the start of the new shipping
season. This rule relaxes requirements currently in effect. Further,
handlers are aware of this rule, which was recommended at a public
meeting. Also, a 20-day comment period was provided for in the proposed
rule and no comments were received.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 920
Kiwifruit, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 920 is amended as
follows:
PART 920--KIWIFRUIT GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 920 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. In Sec. 920.302, paragraph (a)(4) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 920.302 Grade, size, pack, and container regulations.
(a) * * *
(4) Pack Requirements. (i) Kiwifruit packed in containers with cell
compartments, cardboard fillers, or molded trays shall be of proper
size for the cells, fillers, or molds in which they are packed. Such
fruit shall be fairly uniform in size.
(ii) (A) Kiwifruit packed in any container shall be subject to the
size designation, maximum number of fruit per 8-pound sample, and the
size variation tolerance specified as follows:
[[Page 48842]]
Size Designation and Size Variation Chart
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column 2
maximum
number of Column 3 size variation
Column 1 size designation fruit per 8- tolerance (diameter)
pound
sample
------------------------------------------------------------------------
18 or larger.................. 25 \1/2\-inch (12.7 mm).
20............................ 27 \1/2\-inch (12.7 mm).
23............................ 30 \1/2\-inch (12.7 mm).
25............................ 32 \1/2\-inch (12.7 mm).
27/28......................... 35 \1/2\-inch (12.7 mm).
30............................ 39 \1/2\-inch (12.7 mm).
33............................ 43 \3/8\-inch (9.5 mm).
36............................ 46 \3/8\-inch (9.5 mm).
39............................ 49 \3/8\-inch (9.5 mm).
42............................ 53 \3/8\-inch (9.5 mm).
45 or smaller................. 55 \1/4\-inch (6.4 mm).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) The average weight of all sample units in a lot must weigh at
least 8 pounds, but no sample unit may be more than 4 ounces less than
8 pounds.
(C) Not more than 10 percent, by count, of the containers in any
lot and not more than 5 percent, by count, of kiwifruit in any
container, (except that for Sizes 42 and 45 kiwifruit, the tolerance,
by count, in any one container, may not be more than 25 percent) may
fail to meet the size variation requirements of this paragraph.
(iii) All volume fill containers of kiwifruit designated by weight
shall hold 19.8-pounds (9-kilograms) net weight of kiwifruit unless
such containers hold less than 15 pounds or more than 35 pounds net
weight of kiwifruit.
* * * * *
Dated: August 17, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-16571 Filed 8-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P