Yakus Creek Project, Clearwater National Forest, Idaho County, ID, 48518-48519 [05-16360]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
48518
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 159 / Thursday, August 18, 2005 / Notices
established and maintained by regulated
facilities. The information contained in
these records is used by APHIS
inspectors to ensure that dealers,
research facilities, exhibitors,
intermediate handlers, and carriers
comply with the Act and regulations.
Facilities must make and maintain
records that contain official
identification for all dogs and cats and
certification of those animals received
from pounds, shelters, and private
individuals. These records are used to
ensure that stolen pets are not used for
regulated activities. Dealers, exhibitors,
and research facilities that acquire
animals from nonlicensed persons are
required to have the owners of the
animals sign a certification statement
verifying the owner’s exemption from
licensing under the Act. Records must
also be maintained for animals other
than dogs and cats when the animals are
used for purposes regulated under the
Act.
Research facilities must also make
and maintain additional records for
animals covered under the Act that are
used for teaching, testing, and
experimentation. This information is
used by APHIS personnel to review the
research facility’s animal care and use
program.
APHIS needs the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements contained
in 9 CFR part 2 to enforce the Act and
regulations. APHIS also uses the
collected information to provide a
mandatory annual Animal Welfare
Enforcement report to Congress.
We are asking the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) to
approve our use of these information
collection activities for an additional 3
years.
The purpose of this notice is to solicit
comments from the public (as well as
affected agencies) concerning our
information collection. These comments
will help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, through use, as
appropriate, of automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other collection
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:20 Aug 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
technologies, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Estimate of burden: The public
reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average
1.4796408 hours per response.
Respondents: Research facilities, ‘‘A’’
and ‘‘B’’ dealers, exhibitors, carriers,
and intermediate handlers.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 7,305.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 9.1175906.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 66,604.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 98,550 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours
may not equal the product of the annual
number of responses multiplied by the
reporting burden per response.)
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
also become a matter of public record.
Done in Washington, DC, this 12th day of
August 2005.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 05–16377 Filed 8–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Yakus Creek Project, Clearwater
National Forest, Idaho County, ID
Forest Service, USDA
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The USDA, Forest Service,
will prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to disclose the
environmental effect of timber harvest
and watershed restoration activities in
the Yakus Creek project area on the
Lochsa Ranger District of the Clearwater
National Forest. The Yakus Creek
project area is located in the Yakus
Creek drainage, a tributary to Lolo
Creek, approximately 12 air-miles eat of
the town of Kamiah, Idaho.
DATES: This project was previously
scoped in February 2004, and the
comments received will be included in
the documentation for the EIS. A 45-day
public comment period will follow the
release of the draft environmental
impact statement that is expected in
December 2005. The final
environmental impact statement is
expected in May 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
suggestions concerning the scope of this
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
project should be sent to Cindy Land
(clane@fs.fed.us), District Ranger,
Lochsa Ranger District, Rt. 1 Box 398,
Kooskia, ID 83539.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Harbaugh (gharbaugh@fs.fed.us),
Project Leader, Lochsa Ranger District.
Phone: (208) 926–4274.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Yakus
Creek project area contains
approximately 7,900 acres, of which
5,240 acres are National Forest lands
and 2,660 acres are other ownership
(State, timber companies, and private).
The legal location is in portions of
Sections 1, 2, 12, and 13, T33N, R5E;
Sections 3–9, 17, and 18, T33N, R6E;
Sections 25, 26, 35, and 36, T34N, R5E;
and Sections 30–33, T34N, R6E, Boise
Meridian, Idaho County, Idaho. The
proposed actions would occur on
National Forest lands and are all outside
the boundaries of any inventoried
roadless area or any areas considered for
inclusion to the National Wilderness
System as recommended by the
Clearwater National Forest Plan or by
any past or present legislative
wilderness proposals.
Purpose and Need for Action is to: (1)
Improve forest health and start the shift
towards desired patch sizes by: (1)
Shifting species composition from grand
fir to white pine and western larch; (b)
reducing tree densities in immature
stands; (c) regenerating decadent mature
stands; (d) regenerating stands with
insect and root rot problems; (e) creating
desired patches (300–500 acres) with
timber harvest; and (f) connecting
existing seedling/sapling stands, where
possible; (2) restore watershed function
to improve soil productivity and
instream conditions; and (3) manage the
landscape to provide for goods and
services deemed important to society.
The Proposed Action would harvest
timber through regeneration harvest and
commercial thinning on approximately
670 acres of forestland within the Yakus
Creek drainage. Regeneration harvest
(520 acres) would leave approximately
20–25 trees per acre as individual trees
and in groups, where feasible, to
provide future snags and down woody
material for wildlife habitat.
Commercial thinning (150 acres) would
reduce the basal area in dense timbered
stands down to about 160–180 square
feet. There is also an opportunity to
precommercial thin approximately
1,620 acres of young stands scattered
throughout the project area. Use of
existing, temporary and permanent
roads would be needed to access timber
harvest areas. An estimated 1.8 miles of
existing roads would be reconstructed
in addition to 1.2 miles of new specified
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 159 / Thursday, August 18, 2005 / Notices
road construction to facilitate timber
removal. An estimated 2.2 miles of
temporary roads would be constructed
and obliterated following completion of
sale related activities. Watershed
restoration activities would consist of an
estimated 11.6 miles of road
decommissioning, an estimated 13.7
miles of existing roads put into
intermittent storage (self-maintaining),
and the decompaction of approximately
190 acres of old skid trains and
landings.
The Possible Alternatives the Forest
Service will consider include the ‘‘no
action’’ alternative in which none of the
proposed activities would be
implemented. Additional alternatives
being considered examine varying levels
and locations for the proposed activities
to achieve the proposal’s purpose and
need, as well as to respond to the issues
and other resource concerns.
The Responsible Official is the Forest
Supervisor of the Clearwater National
Forest, 12730 Highway 12, Orofino, ID
83544. The Responsible Official will
decide if the proposed project will be
implemented and will document the
decision and reasons for the decision in
a Record of Decision. That decision will
be subject to Forest Service Appeal
Regulations. The responsibility for
preparing the DEIS and FEIS has been
delegated to Cindy Lane, District
Ranger, Lochsa Ranger District, Rt. 1
Box 398, Kooskia, ID 83539.
The Scoping Process was initiated
with the release of a Scoping Letter on
February 10, 2004. Comments received
as a result of that effort will be included
in the documentation for the EIS.
Additional scoping will follow the
release of the DEIS, expected in
December 2005. This proposal also
includes openings greater than 40 acres.
A 60-day public review period and
approval by the Regional Forester for
exceeding the 40 acre limitation will
occur prior to the signing of the Record
of Decision. The 60-day public review
period is initiated with this Notice of
Intent.
Preliminary Issues that could be
affected by proposal activities include:
air quality; economics; grazing; heritage
resources; old growth habitat; recreation
access; risk of landslides; scenic quality;
size of openings; snag habitat; spread of
noxious weeds; threatened, endangered
and sensitive species of wildlife, fish
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:20 Aug 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
and plants; tribal treaty rights; and
water quality.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48519
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: August 10, 2005.
Thomas K. Reilly,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05–16360 Filed 8–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Telephone Bank
Board Approval of Liquidation and
Dissolution of the Bank
AGENCY:
Rural Telephone Bank, USDA.
Notice of Board approval of
liquidation and dissolution of the Rural
Telephone Bank.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In a meeting held August 4,
2005, the Board of Directors (Board) of
the Rural Telephone Bank (Bank)
approved resolutions to liquidate and
dissolve the Bank, subject to lifting of
the current statutory restriction limiting
the amount of Government-owned Class
A stock that the Bank can redeem. This
notice is being published to ensure that
all interested parties are informed of the
details of the resolutions approved by
the Board.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan P. Claffey, Assistant Secretary,
Rural Telephone Bank, STOP 1590—
Room 5151, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
1590. Telephone: (202) 720–9556.
In a
special meeting held on March 11, 2005,
and during its regularly scheduled
meeting held on May 4, 2005, the Board
discussed the possibility of liquidating
and dissolving the Bank. In its meeting
on August 4, 2005, a resolution to
liquidate and dissolve the Bank was
passed unanimously by the Board. The
full text of the resolution is presented
with this notice including two
attachments referenced within the
resolution.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 3410–15–P
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 159 (Thursday, August 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48518-48519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16360]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Yakus Creek Project, Clearwater National Forest, Idaho County, ID
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA, Forest Service, will prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to disclose the environmental effect of timber harvest
and watershed restoration activities in the Yakus Creek project area on
the Lochsa Ranger District of the Clearwater National Forest. The Yakus
Creek project area is located in the Yakus Creek drainage, a tributary
to Lolo Creek, approximately 12 air-miles eat of the town of Kamiah,
Idaho.
DATES: This project was previously scoped in February 2004, and the
comments received will be included in the documentation for the EIS. A
45-day public comment period will follow the release of the draft
environmental impact statement that is expected in December 2005. The
final environmental impact statement is expected in May 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and suggestions concerning the scope of
this project should be sent to Cindy Land (clane@fs.fed.us), District
Ranger, Lochsa Ranger District, Rt. 1 Box 398, Kooskia, ID 83539.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Harbaugh (gharbaugh@fs.fed.us),
Project Leader, Lochsa Ranger District. Phone: (208) 926-4274.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Yakus Creek project area contains
approximately 7,900 acres, of which 5,240 acres are National Forest
lands and 2,660 acres are other ownership (State, timber companies, and
private). The legal location is in portions of Sections 1, 2, 12, and
13, T33N, R5E; Sections 3-9, 17, and 18, T33N, R6E; Sections 25, 26,
35, and 36, T34N, R5E; and Sections 30-33, T34N, R6E, Boise Meridian,
Idaho County, Idaho. The proposed actions would occur on National
Forest lands and are all outside the boundaries of any inventoried
roadless area or any areas considered for inclusion to the National
Wilderness System as recommended by the Clearwater National Forest Plan
or by any past or present legislative wilderness proposals.
Purpose and Need for Action is to: (1) Improve forest health and
start the shift towards desired patch sizes by: (1) Shifting species
composition from grand fir to white pine and western larch; (b)
reducing tree densities in immature stands; (c) regenerating decadent
mature stands; (d) regenerating stands with insect and root rot
problems; (e) creating desired patches (300-500 acres) with timber
harvest; and (f) connecting existing seedling/sapling stands, where
possible; (2) restore watershed function to improve soil productivity
and instream conditions; and (3) manage the landscape to provide for
goods and services deemed important to society.
The Proposed Action would harvest timber through regeneration
harvest and commercial thinning on approximately 670 acres of
forestland within the Yakus Creek drainage. Regeneration harvest (520
acres) would leave approximately 20-25 trees per acre as individual
trees and in groups, where feasible, to provide future snags and down
woody material for wildlife habitat. Commercial thinning (150 acres)
would reduce the basal area in dense timbered stands down to about 160-
180 square feet. There is also an opportunity to precommercial thin
approximately 1,620 acres of young stands scattered throughout the
project area. Use of existing, temporary and permanent roads would be
needed to access timber harvest areas. An estimated 1.8 miles of
existing roads would be reconstructed in addition to 1.2 miles of new
specified
[[Page 48519]]
road construction to facilitate timber removal. An estimated 2.2 miles
of temporary roads would be constructed and obliterated following
completion of sale related activities. Watershed restoration activities
would consist of an estimated 11.6 miles of road decommissioning, an
estimated 13.7 miles of existing roads put into intermittent storage
(self-maintaining), and the decompaction of approximately 190 acres of
old skid trains and landings.
The Possible Alternatives the Forest Service will consider include
the ``no action'' alternative in which none of the proposed activities
would be implemented. Additional alternatives being considered examine
varying levels and locations for the proposed activities to achieve the
proposal's purpose and need, as well as to respond to the issues and
other resource concerns.
The Responsible Official is the Forest Supervisor of the Clearwater
National Forest, 12730 Highway 12, Orofino, ID 83544. The Responsible
Official will decide if the proposed project will be implemented and
will document the decision and reasons for the decision in a Record of
Decision. That decision will be subject to Forest Service Appeal
Regulations. The responsibility for preparing the DEIS and FEIS has
been delegated to Cindy Lane, District Ranger, Lochsa Ranger District,
Rt. 1 Box 398, Kooskia, ID 83539.
The Scoping Process was initiated with the release of a Scoping
Letter on February 10, 2004. Comments received as a result of that
effort will be included in the documentation for the EIS. Additional
scoping will follow the release of the DEIS, expected in December 2005.
This proposal also includes openings greater than 40 acres. A 60-day
public review period and approval by the Regional Forester for
exceeding the 40 acre limitation will occur prior to the signing of the
Record of Decision. The 60-day public review period is initiated with
this Notice of Intent.
Preliminary Issues that could be affected by proposal activities
include: air quality; economics; grazing; heritage resources; old
growth habitat; recreation access; risk of landslides; scenic quality;
size of openings; snag habitat; spread of noxious weeds; threatened,
endangered and sensitive species of wildlife, fish and plants; tribal
treaty rights; and water quality.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal
Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: August 10, 2005.
Thomas K. Reilly,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05-16360 Filed 8-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
