Black Hills National Forest, Northern Hills Ranger District, South Dakota and Bearlodge Ranger District, Wyoming, North Zone Range 05 Proposal and Analysis, 48369-48370 [05-16259]
Download as PDF
48369
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 158
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Black Hills National Forest, Northern
Hills Ranger District, South Dakota and
Bearlodge Ranger District, Wyoming,
North Zone Range 05 Proposal and
Analysis
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Revise Rangeland Allotment
Management Plans (RAMP) for eight
allotments comprising about 79,634
acres within two Ranger Districts of the
Black Hills National Forest and analyze
continuation of grazing within the
constraints of the Revised Black Hills
National Forest Land and Resource
Management Plan, as amended (BHNF
LRMP).
Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received within
30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. The draft environmental
impact statement is expected in
December, 2005 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected February, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Alice Allen, Hell Canyon Ranger
District, 330 Mt. Rushmore Rd., Custer,
South Dakota 57730. Comment may also
be submitted by e-mail to: commentsrocky-mountain-black-hillsbearlodge@fs.fed.us with ‘‘North Zone
Range 05’’ as subject.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alice Allen, Project Coordinator, Black
Hills National Forest, Hell Canyon
Ranger District, at 330 Mt. Rushmore
Rd., phone (605) 673–4853.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action: The
purpose of the project is to authorize
livestock grazing in an environmentally
acceptable manner. The EIS will
determine current conditions, analyze
DATES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:34 Aug 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
environmental consequences of grazing
management actions on those
conditions, and assist the decision
maker in selecting management/
monitoring strategies consistent with
meeting desired conditions in the BHNF
LRMP, including Goals 1, 2 and 3. The
need for the action is to revise allotment
management plans, reverse any existing
undesirable conditions, and ensure that
authorized uses and associated
management activities move them
towards desired BHNF LRMP
conditions. There is also a need to
respond to requests for grazing permits
on lands not currently being grazed.
Proposed Action: The Northern Hills
and Bearlodge Ranger Districts propose
to implement best management
practices and activities with adaptive
management and monitoring strategies
to allow livestock grazing consistent
with Forest Plan desired conditions,
standards and guidelines.
Possible Alternatives: The Current
Management Alternative would not
change current permitted livestock
grazing. The No Grazing Alternative
would eliminate any livestock grazing
on the project area.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official for the
allotments on the Bearlodge Ranger
District is Steve Kozel, District Ranger,
Black Hills National Forest, Bearlodge
Ranger District, 121 S. 21st Street,
Sundance, Wyoming 82729. THe
Responsible Official for the allotments
on the Northern Hills Ranger District is
Pamela Brown, District Ranger, Black
Hills National Forest, Northern Hills
Ranger District, 2014 N. Main St.,
Spearfish, South Dakota 57783.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether to
continue to permit livestock grazing on
all, part, or none of these allotments
and, if so, under what terms and
conditions to ensure that desired
condition objectives are met, or that
movement occurs toward those
objectives. Whether or not to allow
livestock grazing on three recently
acquired parcels and one vacant grazing
unit will also be decided, and if so,
under what conditions.
Scoping Process
Comments and input regarding the
proposal were requested from the
public, other groups and agencies via
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
direct mailing on March 21, 2005.
Comments were due by April 20, 2005.
Additional comments will be solicited
during August and September 2005 via
public notices and an additional direct
mailing. Also, response to the draft EIS
will be sought from the interested
public in December 2005 and January
2006. Preliminary issues include
grassland and riparian health, water
quality, and effects on sensitive wildlife
and plant species.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping proces which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. It is the District’s
desire to involve interested parties in
identifying the issues related to grazing
management. Comments will help the
planning team identify key issues and
opportunities used to develop adaptive
management tools, monitoring
strategies, and alternatives. Persons who
submitted comments previously need
not resubmit those same comments in
response to this request. Comments
submitted previously will continue to
be considered.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental
impacts statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objectives that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts, City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
48370
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Notices
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impacts statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
Tuesday, September 06, 2005, at
18:00 hours.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Diamond Valley School, 35
Hawkside Drive, Markleeville,
California 96120. Send written commtns
to Franklin Pemberton, Alpine County
RAC coordinator, c/o USDA Forest
Service, Humboldt-Toiyabe N.F., Carson
Ranger District 1536 So. Carson Street,
Carson City, NV 89701.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alpine Co. RAC Coordinator, Franklin
Pemberton at (775) 884–8150; or Gary
Schiff, Carson District Ranger and
Designated Federal Officer, at (775)
884–8100, or electronically to
fpemberton@fs.fed.us.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
RAC Meeting
Dated: August 10, 2005.
Craig Bobzien,
Forest Supervisor, Black Hills National Forest.
[FR Doc. 05–16259 Filed 8–16–05; 8:45 am]
9/06/05 at 6 p.m.
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
New Business
Forest Service
Alpine County, CA, Resource Advisory
Committee (RAC)
Agenda
Diamond Valley School
Old Business
I. Approve minutes from last meeting.
Adjourn
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in
the Federal Advisory Committees Act
(Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–
393) the Alpine County Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet on
Tuesday, September 06, 2005 at 18:00 at
the Diamond Valley School for business
meetings. The purpose of the meeting is
to discuss issues relating to
implementing the Secure Rural Schools
and Community Self-Determination Act
of 2000 (Payment to States) and
expenditure of Title II funds. The
meetings are open to the public.
Jkt 205001
Dated: August 10, 2005.
Gary Schiff,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 05–16261 Filed 8–16–05; 8:45 am]
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
13:34 Aug 16, 2005
The
meeting is open to the public. Council
discussion is limited to Forest Service
staff and Council members. However,
persons who wish to bring urban and
community forestry matters to the
attention of the council may file written
statements with the Council staff before
and after the meeting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Discuss corrections to Project
Status/Monitoring.
II. Review RAC Financial
Information/Discuss Fund Distribution.
III. Schedule next meeting.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
VerDate jul<14>2003
DATES:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration
[05–MN–A]
Cancellation of Minnesota’s
Designation and the Opportunity for
Designation in the Minnesota Area
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The United States Grain
Standards Act, as amended (Act),
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provides that official agency
designations will be cancelled upon
request by the official agency with a 90
day written notice to Grain Inspection,
Packers and Stockyards Administration
(GIPSA). The Minnesota Department of
Agriculture (Minnesota), designated to
provide official inspection and weighing
services until September 30, 2006, has
requested GIPSA to cancel the
designation, covering official domestic
services, effective November 9, 2005.
Minnesota will continue to provide
export services under a delegation
agreement with GIPSA. Accordingly,
GIPSA is announcing that Minnesota’s
designation will be canceled, on or
about November 9, 2005. GIPSA is
asking for applicants for domestic
service in the Minnesota area.
DATES: Applications and comments
must be postmarked or electronically
dated on or before September 16, 2005.
ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit
applications and comments on this
notice. You may submit applications
and comments by any of the following
methods:
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver to
Janet M. Hart, Chief, Review Branch,
Compliance Division, GIPSA, USDA,
Room 1647–S, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250.
• Fax: Send by facsimile transmission
to (202) 690–2755, attention: Janet M.
Hart.
• E-mail: Send via electronic mail to
Janet.M.Hart@usda.gov.
• Mail: Send hardcopy to Janet M.
Hart, Chief, Review Branch, Compliance
Division, GIPSA, USDA, STOP 3604,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3604.
Read Applications and Comments:
All applications and comments will be
available for public inspection at the
office above during regular business
hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janet M. Hart at 202–720–8525, e-mail
Janet.M.Hart@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action has been reviewed and
determined not to be a rule or regulation
as defined in Executive Order 12866
and Departmental Regulation 1512–1;
therefore, the Executive Order and
Departmental Regulation do not apply
to this action.
Section 7(f)(1) of the Act authorizes
GIPSA’s Administrator to designate a
qualified applicant to provide official
services in a specified area after
determining that the applicant is better
able than any other applicant to provide
such official services. GIPSA designated
Minnesota, headquarters in Saint Paul,
Minnesota, to provide official
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48369-48370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16259]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 /
Notices
[[Page 48369]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Black Hills National Forest, Northern Hills Ranger District,
South Dakota and Bearlodge Ranger District, Wyoming, North Zone Range
05 Proposal and Analysis
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Revise Rangeland Allotment Management Plans (RAMP) for eight
allotments comprising about 79,634 acres within two Ranger Districts of
the Black Hills National Forest and analyze continuation of grazing
within the constraints of the Revised Black Hills National Forest Land
and Resource Management Plan, as amended (BHNF LRMP).
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
within 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The draft
environmental impact statement is expected in December, 2005 and the
final environmental impact statement is expected February, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alice Allen, Hell Canyon Ranger
District, 330 Mt. Rushmore Rd., Custer, South Dakota 57730. Comment may
also be submitted by e-mail to: comments-rocky-mountain-black-hills-
bearlodge@fs.fed.us with ``North Zone Range 05'' as subject.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Allen, Project Coordinator,
Black Hills National Forest, Hell Canyon Ranger District, at 330 Mt.
Rushmore Rd., phone (605) 673-4853.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action: The purpose of the project is to
authorize livestock grazing in an environmentally acceptable manner.
The EIS will determine current conditions, analyze environmental
consequences of grazing management actions on those conditions, and
assist the decision maker in selecting management/monitoring strategies
consistent with meeting desired conditions in the BHNF LRMP, including
Goals 1, 2 and 3. The need for the action is to revise allotment
management plans, reverse any existing undesirable conditions, and
ensure that authorized uses and associated management activities move
them towards desired BHNF LRMP conditions. There is also a need to
respond to requests for grazing permits on lands not currently being
grazed.
Proposed Action: The Northern Hills and Bearlodge Ranger Districts
propose to implement best management practices and activities with
adaptive management and monitoring strategies to allow livestock
grazing consistent with Forest Plan desired conditions, standards and
guidelines.
Possible Alternatives: The Current Management Alternative would not
change current permitted livestock grazing. The No Grazing Alternative
would eliminate any livestock grazing on the project area.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official for the allotments on the Bearlodge Ranger
District is Steve Kozel, District Ranger, Black Hills National Forest,
Bearlodge Ranger District, 121 S. 21st Street, Sundance, Wyoming 82729.
THe Responsible Official for the allotments on the Northern Hills
Ranger District is Pamela Brown, District Ranger, Black Hills National
Forest, Northern Hills Ranger District, 2014 N. Main St., Spearfish,
South Dakota 57783.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether to continue to permit livestock
grazing on all, part, or none of these allotments and, if so, under
what terms and conditions to ensure that desired condition objectives
are met, or that movement occurs toward those objectives. Whether or
not to allow livestock grazing on three recently acquired parcels and
one vacant grazing unit will also be decided, and if so, under what
conditions.
Scoping Process
Comments and input regarding the proposal were requested from the
public, other groups and agencies via direct mailing on March 21, 2005.
Comments were due by April 20, 2005. Additional comments will be
solicited during August and September 2005 via public notices and an
additional direct mailing. Also, response to the draft EIS will be
sought from the interested public in December 2005 and January 2006.
Preliminary issues include grassland and riparian health, water
quality, and effects on sensitive wildlife and plant species.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the scoping proces which guides the
development of the environmental impact statement. It is the District's
desire to involve interested parties in identifying the issues related
to grazing management. Comments will help the planning team identify
key issues and opportunities used to develop adaptive management tools,
monitoring strategies, and alternatives. Persons who submitted comments
previously need not resubmit those same comments in response to this
request. Comments submitted previously will continue to be considered.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal
Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impacts statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objectives that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts, City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp.
[[Page 48370]]
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this proposed action participate by
the close of the 45-day comment period so that substantive comments and
objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it
can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impacts statement should be as specific as possible. It
is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: August 10, 2005.
Craig Bobzien,
Forest Supervisor, Black Hills National Forest.
[FR Doc. 05-16259 Filed 8-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M