Black Hills National Forest, Northern Hills Ranger District, South Dakota and Bearlodge Ranger District, Wyoming, North Zone Range 05 Proposal and Analysis, 48369-48370 [05-16259]

Download as PDF 48369 Notices Federal Register Vol. 70, No. 158 Wednesday, August 17, 2005 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this section. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Black Hills National Forest, Northern Hills Ranger District, South Dakota and Bearlodge Ranger District, Wyoming, North Zone Range 05 Proposal and Analysis Forest Service, USDA. Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: Revise Rangeland Allotment Management Plans (RAMP) for eight allotments comprising about 79,634 acres within two Ranger Districts of the Black Hills National Forest and analyze continuation of grazing within the constraints of the Revised Black Hills National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, as amended (BHNF LRMP). Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received within 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The draft environmental impact statement is expected in December, 2005 and the final environmental impact statement is expected February, 2005. ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alice Allen, Hell Canyon Ranger District, 330 Mt. Rushmore Rd., Custer, South Dakota 57730. Comment may also be submitted by e-mail to: commentsrocky-mountain-black-hillsbearlodge@fs.fed.us with ‘‘North Zone Range 05’’ as subject. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Allen, Project Coordinator, Black Hills National Forest, Hell Canyon Ranger District, at 330 Mt. Rushmore Rd., phone (605) 673–4853. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose and Need for Action: The purpose of the project is to authorize livestock grazing in an environmentally acceptable manner. The EIS will determine current conditions, analyze DATES: VerDate jul<14>2003 13:34 Aug 16, 2005 Jkt 205001 environmental consequences of grazing management actions on those conditions, and assist the decision maker in selecting management/ monitoring strategies consistent with meeting desired conditions in the BHNF LRMP, including Goals 1, 2 and 3. The need for the action is to revise allotment management plans, reverse any existing undesirable conditions, and ensure that authorized uses and associated management activities move them towards desired BHNF LRMP conditions. There is also a need to respond to requests for grazing permits on lands not currently being grazed. Proposed Action: The Northern Hills and Bearlodge Ranger Districts propose to implement best management practices and activities with adaptive management and monitoring strategies to allow livestock grazing consistent with Forest Plan desired conditions, standards and guidelines. Possible Alternatives: The Current Management Alternative would not change current permitted livestock grazing. The No Grazing Alternative would eliminate any livestock grazing on the project area. Responsible Official The Responsible Official for the allotments on the Bearlodge Ranger District is Steve Kozel, District Ranger, Black Hills National Forest, Bearlodge Ranger District, 121 S. 21st Street, Sundance, Wyoming 82729. THe Responsible Official for the allotments on the Northern Hills Ranger District is Pamela Brown, District Ranger, Black Hills National Forest, Northern Hills Ranger District, 2014 N. Main St., Spearfish, South Dakota 57783. Nature of Decision To Be Made The decision to be made is whether to continue to permit livestock grazing on all, part, or none of these allotments and, if so, under what terms and conditions to ensure that desired condition objectives are met, or that movement occurs toward those objectives. Whether or not to allow livestock grazing on three recently acquired parcels and one vacant grazing unit will also be decided, and if so, under what conditions. Scoping Process Comments and input regarding the proposal were requested from the public, other groups and agencies via PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 direct mailing on March 21, 2005. Comments were due by April 20, 2005. Additional comments will be solicited during August and September 2005 via public notices and an additional direct mailing. Also, response to the draft EIS will be sought from the interested public in December 2005 and January 2006. Preliminary issues include grassland and riparian health, water quality, and effects on sensitive wildlife and plant species. Comment Requested This notice of intent initiates the scoping proces which guides the development of the environmental impact statement. It is the District’s desire to involve interested parties in identifying the issues related to grazing management. Comments will help the planning team identify key issues and opportunities used to develop adaptive management tools, monitoring strategies, and alternatives. Persons who submitted comments previously need not resubmit those same comments in response to this request. Comments submitted previously will continue to be considered. Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent Environmental Review: A draft environmental impact statement will be prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of draft environmental impacts statements must structure their participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer’s position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, environmental objectives that could be raised at the draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may be waived or dismissed by the courts, City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM 17AUN1 48370 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Notices 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close of the 45day comment period so that substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final environmental impact statement. To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft environmental impacts statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points. Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal and will be available for public inspection. Tuesday, September 06, 2005, at 18:00 hours. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Diamond Valley School, 35 Hawkside Drive, Markleeville, California 96120. Send written commtns to Franklin Pemberton, Alpine County RAC coordinator, c/o USDA Forest Service, Humboldt-Toiyabe N.F., Carson Ranger District 1536 So. Carson Street, Carson City, NV 89701. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alpine Co. RAC Coordinator, Franklin Pemberton at (775) 884–8150; or Gary Schiff, Carson District Ranger and Designated Federal Officer, at (775) 884–8100, or electronically to fpemberton@fs.fed.us. (Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section 21) RAC Meeting Dated: August 10, 2005. Craig Bobzien, Forest Supervisor, Black Hills National Forest. [FR Doc. 05–16259 Filed 8–16–05; 8:45 am] 9/06/05 at 6 p.m. BILLING CODE 3410–11–M New Business Forest Service Alpine County, CA, Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) Agenda Diamond Valley School Old Business I. Approve minutes from last meeting. Adjourn BILLING CODE 3410–11–P SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committees Act (Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106– 393) the Alpine County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet on Tuesday, September 06, 2005 at 18:00 at the Diamond Valley School for business meetings. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss issues relating to implementing the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Payment to States) and expenditure of Title II funds. The meetings are open to the public. Jkt 205001 Dated: August 10, 2005. Gary Schiff, Designated Federal Official. [FR Doc. 05–16261 Filed 8–16–05; 8:45 am] Forest Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of meeting. AGENCY: 13:34 Aug 16, 2005 The meeting is open to the public. Council discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Council members. However, persons who wish to bring urban and community forestry matters to the attention of the council may file written statements with the Council staff before and after the meeting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Discuss corrections to Project Status/Monitoring. II. Review RAC Financial Information/Discuss Fund Distribution. III. Schedule next meeting. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE VerDate jul<14>2003 DATES: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration [05–MN–A] Cancellation of Minnesota’s Designation and the Opportunity for Designation in the Minnesota Area Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The United States Grain Standards Act, as amended (Act), PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 provides that official agency designations will be cancelled upon request by the official agency with a 90 day written notice to Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA). The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (Minnesota), designated to provide official inspection and weighing services until September 30, 2006, has requested GIPSA to cancel the designation, covering official domestic services, effective November 9, 2005. Minnesota will continue to provide export services under a delegation agreement with GIPSA. Accordingly, GIPSA is announcing that Minnesota’s designation will be canceled, on or about November 9, 2005. GIPSA is asking for applicants for domestic service in the Minnesota area. DATES: Applications and comments must be postmarked or electronically dated on or before September 16, 2005. ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit applications and comments on this notice. You may submit applications and comments by any of the following methods: • Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver to Janet M. Hart, Chief, Review Branch, Compliance Division, GIPSA, USDA, Room 1647–S, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250. • Fax: Send by facsimile transmission to (202) 690–2755, attention: Janet M. Hart. • E-mail: Send via electronic mail to Janet.M.Hart@usda.gov. • Mail: Send hardcopy to Janet M. Hart, Chief, Review Branch, Compliance Division, GIPSA, USDA, STOP 3604, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–3604. Read Applications and Comments: All applications and comments will be available for public inspection at the office above during regular business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet M. Hart at 202–720–8525, e-mail Janet.M.Hart@usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action has been reviewed and determined not to be a rule or regulation as defined in Executive Order 12866 and Departmental Regulation 1512–1; therefore, the Executive Order and Departmental Regulation do not apply to this action. Section 7(f)(1) of the Act authorizes GIPSA’s Administrator to designate a qualified applicant to provide official services in a specified area after determining that the applicant is better able than any other applicant to provide such official services. GIPSA designated Minnesota, headquarters in Saint Paul, Minnesota, to provide official E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM 17AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48369-48370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16259]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / 
Notices

[[Page 48369]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Black Hills National Forest, Northern Hills Ranger District, 
South Dakota and Bearlodge Ranger District, Wyoming, North Zone Range 
05 Proposal and Analysis

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Revise Rangeland Allotment Management Plans (RAMP) for eight 
allotments comprising about 79,634 acres within two Ranger Districts of 
the Black Hills National Forest and analyze continuation of grazing 
within the constraints of the Revised Black Hills National Forest Land 
and Resource Management Plan, as amended (BHNF LRMP).

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received 
within 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The draft 
environmental impact statement is expected in December, 2005 and the 
final environmental impact statement is expected February, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alice Allen, Hell Canyon Ranger 
District, 330 Mt. Rushmore Rd., Custer, South Dakota 57730. Comment may 
also be submitted by e-mail to: comments-rocky-mountain-black-hills-
bearlodge@fs.fed.us with ``North Zone Range 05'' as subject.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Allen, Project Coordinator, 
Black Hills National Forest, Hell Canyon Ranger District, at 330 Mt. 
Rushmore Rd., phone (605) 673-4853.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose and Need for Action: The purpose of the project is to 
authorize livestock grazing in an environmentally acceptable manner. 
The EIS will determine current conditions, analyze environmental 
consequences of grazing management actions on those conditions, and 
assist the decision maker in selecting management/monitoring strategies 
consistent with meeting desired conditions in the BHNF LRMP, including 
Goals 1, 2 and 3. The need for the action is to revise allotment 
management plans, reverse any existing undesirable conditions, and 
ensure that authorized uses and associated management activities move 
them towards desired BHNF LRMP conditions. There is also a need to 
respond to requests for grazing permits on lands not currently being 
grazed.
    Proposed Action: The Northern Hills and Bearlodge Ranger Districts 
propose to implement best management practices and activities with 
adaptive management and monitoring strategies to allow livestock 
grazing consistent with Forest Plan desired conditions, standards and 
guidelines.
    Possible Alternatives: The Current Management Alternative would not 
change current permitted livestock grazing. The No Grazing Alternative 
would eliminate any livestock grazing on the project area.

Responsible Official

    The Responsible Official for the allotments on the Bearlodge Ranger 
District is Steve Kozel, District Ranger, Black Hills National Forest, 
Bearlodge Ranger District, 121 S. 21st Street, Sundance, Wyoming 82729. 
THe Responsible Official for the allotments on the Northern Hills 
Ranger District is Pamela Brown, District Ranger, Black Hills National 
Forest, Northern Hills Ranger District, 2014 N. Main St., Spearfish, 
South Dakota 57783.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    The decision to be made is whether to continue to permit livestock 
grazing on all, part, or none of these allotments and, if so, under 
what terms and conditions to ensure that desired condition objectives 
are met, or that movement occurs toward those objectives. Whether or 
not to allow livestock grazing on three recently acquired parcels and 
one vacant grazing unit will also be decided, and if so, under what 
conditions.

Scoping Process

    Comments and input regarding the proposal were requested from the 
public, other groups and agencies via direct mailing on March 21, 2005. 
Comments were due by April 20, 2005. Additional comments will be 
solicited during August and September 2005 via public notices and an 
additional direct mailing. Also, response to the draft EIS will be 
sought from the interested public in December 2005 and January 2006. 
Preliminary issues include grassland and riparian health, water 
quality, and effects on sensitive wildlife and plant species.

Comment Requested

    This notice of intent initiates the scoping proces which guides the 
development of the environmental impact statement. It is the District's 
desire to involve interested parties in identifying the issues related 
to grazing management. Comments will help the planning team identify 
key issues and opportunities used to develop adaptive management tools, 
monitoring strategies, and alternatives. Persons who submitted comments 
previously need not resubmit those same comments in response to this 
request. Comments submitted previously will continue to be considered.
    Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent 
Environmental Review: A draft environmental impact statement will be 
prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environmental 
impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental 
Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal 
Register.
    The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important 
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public 
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of 
draft environmental impacts statements must structure their 
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is 
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and 
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 
553 (1978). Also, environmental objectives that could be raised at the 
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised 
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may 
be waived or dismissed by the courts, City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 
F. Supp.

[[Page 48370]]

1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very 
important that those interested in this proposed action participate by 
the close of the 45-day comment period so that substantive comments and 
objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it 
can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final 
environmental impact statement.
    To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues 
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft 
environmental impacts statement should be as specific as possible. It 
is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the 
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft 
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives 
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer 
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing 
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
    Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who 
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal 
and will be available for public inspection.

(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook 
1909.15, Section 21)

    Dated: August 10, 2005.
Craig Bobzien,
Forest Supervisor, Black Hills National Forest.
[FR Doc. 05-16259 Filed 8-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.