2006 Census Test Coverage Followup Operation, 48371-48372 [05-16250]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Notices
inspection services under the Act on
April 1, 2005.
Section 7(g)(1) of the Act provides
that designations of official agencies
will end not later than triennially and
may be renewed according to the
criteria and procedures prescribed in
section 7(f) of the Act. The designation
of Minnesota ends on September 30,
2006, according to the Act. However,
Minnesota asked GIPSA for a voluntary
cancellation of their designation
effective November 9, 2005.
Accordingly, Minnesota’s designation
will cease effective November 8, 2005,
and GIPSA is asking for applicants to
provide official service.
Pursuant to section 7(f)(2) of the Act,
the following geographic area, the entire
State of Minnesota, except those export
port locations within the State, is
assigned to this official agency.
Interested persons are hereby given the
opportunity to apply for designation to
provide official services in the
geographic areas specified above under
provisions of section 7(f) of the Act and
section 800.196(d) of the regulations
issued thereunder. Persons wishing to
apply for designation should contact the
Compliance Division at the address
listed above for forms and information,
or obtain applications at the GIPSA Web
site, https://www.usda.gov/gipsa/
oversight/parovreg.htm.
Authority: Pub. L. 94–582, 90 Stat. 2867,
as amended (7 U.S.C. 71 et seq.).
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection,
Packers and Stockyards Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–16247 Filed 8–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–EN–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
2006 Census Test Coverage Followup
Operation
ACTION:
Proposed collection; comment
request.
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before October 17,
2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:34 Aug 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at DHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Frank Vitrano, U.S.
Census Bureau, Building 2, Room 2012,
Washington, DC 20233–9200, 301–763–
3961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Abstract
Improving coverage, or how well the
Census Bureau counts people and
housing units in the census, is one of
the major goals for the 2010 Census. The
U.S. Census Bureau has designed a
series of tests intended to examine new
methods for improving overall coverage
of the population and housing.
Favorable results will be implemented
in the 2010 Decennial Census Program.
In preparation for the 2010 Census, the
Census Bureau has conducted two
previous operations designed to
evaluate the effectiveness of new
procedures for improving coverage and
reducing duplication. These coverage
measurement operations are the 2004
Census Test Coverage Research
Followup (OMB Approval Number
0607–0910) and the 2005 National
Census Test Coverage Followup (OMB
Approval Number 0607–0916.)
The 2006 Census Test is part of the
cycle of tests leading up to the 2010
Census. Like other tests, the primary
goals of this test are designed to
evaluate new methods and systems
intended to improve accuracy, provide
more timely and relevant data, reduce
risks, and/or contain costs. In support of
these goals, the 2006 Coverage Followup
(CFU) operation is designed to study a
method to improve coverage that
collects additional information from
households that might have coverage
problems. This includes households
where persons might have been counted
more than once (e.g., students who are
counted at their parents’ home but also
counted where they reside while they
are attending school) and persons who
might not have been included in the
household count (e.g., newborn babies
or roommates). This operation also will
contact large households (those with
more than six persons listed on their
mail-back questionnaires) in order to
ensure that everyone is included in the
census. Another category of households
that we will attempt to contact are those
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48371
that contain persons identified through
the StARS database (an administrative
records database built from six national
level data files) but who were not
included on the appropriate census
questionnaire. Finally, this operation
will include households where the
count of persons does not equal the
number of persons for which census
data were provided during enumeration
II. Method of Collection
The 2006 Census Test CFU operation
will be conducted in selected locations
in Travis County, Texas and the
Cheyenne River Reservation and Off
Reservation Trust Land, South Dakota in
two phases: telephone and personal
visit.
The telephone operation will be
conducted April 21, 2006, through
August 31, 2006, with an expected
workload of approximately 25,000
housing units in Travis County and
approximately 400 housing units in the
Cheyenne River Reservation. During this
operation, the CFU interviewers will
attempt to contact, via telephone, a
portion of the households that fall
within the CFU sample that provided a
telephone number on the questionnaire.
The followup interviews will be
conducted by U.S. Census Bureau staff
at two of the U.S. Census Bureau’s
telephone call centers, located in
Jeffersonville, IN and Tucson, AZ. These
interviews will be conducted by
computer-assisted telephone
interviewing (CATI). The CATI
instrument will be in English, or in
Spanish for those respondents who wish
to report their information in the
Spanish language. We expect an
approximately 60% response rate for the
telephone operation. Nonrespondents
during this operation will be sent for
personal visit followup.
The personal visit operation will be
conducted July 21, 2006, through
August 31, 2006, with an expected
workload of approximately 28,000
housing units in Travis County and
approximately 400 housing units in the
Cheyenne River Reservation, including
those nonrespondents from the
telephone operation. During this
operation, enumerators will attempt to
enumerate respondents using a paper
questionnaire. We expect an
approximately 90% response rate for the
personal visit operation.
The purpose of the CFU telephone
and personal visit contact is to identify
those persons who may have been
counted in more than one household or
erroneously excluded from any
household. The items included in the
2006 CFU questionnaire are probes that
are intended to indicate whether
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
48372
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Notices
respondents understood and properly
applied the residence rules instructions
on the 2006 Census Test questionnaire.
III. Data
OMB Number: Not available.
Form Number:
Type of Review: Regular.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
Approximately 53,800 housing units.
Estimated Time Per Response: The
personal visit operation and the
telephone operation will each require
approximately 10 minutes for response.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: Approximately 8,967 hours for
the total CFU workload.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: There is
no cost to respondents except for their
time to respond.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 of the United
States Code, Sections 141 and 193.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: August 11, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–16250 Filed 8–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Applications for Duty–Free Entry of
Scientific Instruments
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:34 Aug 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
301), we invite comments on the
question of whether instruments of
equivalent scientific value, for the
purposes for which the instruments
shown below are intended to be used,
are being manufactured in the United
States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR
301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and
be filed within 20 days with the
Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Washington,
DC 20230. Applications may be
examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m.
in Suite 4100W, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Franklin Court Building,
1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 05–032. Applicant:
State University of New York, Stony
Brook. Instrument: Mass Spectrometer,
Model JEM–2200FS. Manufacturer:
JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: The
instrument is intended to be used to
directly observe atoms in crystalline
materials, to perform quantitative
imaging and electron diffraction
experiments, to obtain detailed
structural information from biological
samples and to characterize and
understand the crystallographic atomic
and electronic structure of various
technologically important
materials.Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: July 20,
2005.
Docket Number: 05–034. Applicant:
The University of Southern Mississippi,
118 College Drive, ι5104, Hattiesburg,
MS 39406-0001. Instrument: Electron
Microscope, Model JEM–2100.
Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.
Intended Use: The instrument is
intended to be used for analyzing
polymers, composites, and biological
materials. Objectives of studies will
include practices which will prove
successful in demonstrating the
importance and usefulness of electron
microscopy in polymer and biological
research and education of students. It
will also be used widely in courses.
Application accepted by Commissioner
of Customs: July 27, 2005.
Docket Number: 05–035. Applicant:
Princeton University, P.O. BOX 33, 2
New South Building, Princeton, NJ
08544. Instrument: Geiger Mode
Ionizing Counters. Manufacturer:
pol.hi.tech, Italy. Intended Use: The
instrument is intended to be used for
conducting the ‘‘BaBar’’ experiment at
the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
to detect penetrating ionizing particles
emanating from decaying B mesons, to
study all the systematics of B meson
decay processes. The detectors will be
installed at the Accelerator Center and
will become an integral part of the
experiment (which involves the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
participation of over 500 scientists,
worldwide) until its conclusion. The
main objective is to study the puzzling
phenomenon of CP violation, the only
known difference in behavior of matter
and antimatter. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: August 2,
2005.
Docket Number: 05–036. Applicant:
Areas Global TB Vaccine Foundation.
Instrument: CyFlow ML Flow
Cytometer, Model 16 parameter - 4 light
sources. Manufacturer: Partec, GmbH,
Germany. Intended Use: The instrument
is intended to be used to investigate
subsets of human and animal cells for
special characteristics as cytokine
production using human PMBC samples
from clinical vaccination trials and cells
from animal studies.
Research will focus on:
1. Intracellular flow cytometry analysis
of special subsets of cells to antigen–
stimulation specific cytokine
production
2. Develop clinical endpoint assay to
assess effects of new vaccines.
3. Establish SOPs, validate the assay and
train personnel.
4. Develop new flow–based assays for
the assessment of dendritic cells.
Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: August 3,
2005.
Gerald A. Zerdy,
Program Manager Statutory Import Programs
Staff.
[FR Doc. E5–4492 Filed 8–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Environmental Technologies Trade
Advisory Committee (ETTAC)
International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
Date: September 16, 2005.
Time: 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Place: Department of Commerce, 14th
and Constitution NW., Washington DC
20230, Room 4830.
Summary: The Environmental
Technologies Trade Advisory
Committee (ETTAC) will hold a plenary
meeting on September 16, 2005, at the
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, in Room 4830.
The ETTAC will discuss global climate
change mitigation initiatives, the
European Union’s electronic and other
waste initiatives, updated negotiations
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48371-48372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16250]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
2006 Census Test Coverage Followup Operation
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before October 17,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th
and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at DHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions
should be directed to Frank Vitrano, U.S. Census Bureau, Building 2,
Room 2012, Washington, DC 20233-9200, 301-763-3961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
Improving coverage, or how well the Census Bureau counts people and
housing units in the census, is one of the major goals for the 2010
Census. The U.S. Census Bureau has designed a series of tests intended
to examine new methods for improving overall coverage of the population
and housing. Favorable results will be implemented in the 2010
Decennial Census Program. In preparation for the 2010 Census, the
Census Bureau has conducted two previous operations designed to
evaluate the effectiveness of new procedures for improving coverage and
reducing duplication. These coverage measurement operations are the
2004 Census Test Coverage Research Followup (OMB Approval Number 0607-
0910) and the 2005 National Census Test Coverage Followup (OMB Approval
Number 0607-0916.)
The 2006 Census Test is part of the cycle of tests leading up to
the 2010 Census. Like other tests, the primary goals of this test are
designed to evaluate new methods and systems intended to improve
accuracy, provide more timely and relevant data, reduce risks, and/or
contain costs. In support of these goals, the 2006 Coverage Followup
(CFU) operation is designed to study a method to improve coverage that
collects additional information from households that might have
coverage problems. This includes households where persons might have
been counted more than once (e.g., students who are counted at their
parents' home but also counted where they reside while they are
attending school) and persons who might not have been included in the
household count (e.g., newborn babies or roommates). This operation
also will contact large households (those with more than six persons
listed on their mail-back questionnaires) in order to ensure that
everyone is included in the census. Another category of households that
we will attempt to contact are those that contain persons identified
through the StARS database (an administrative records database built
from six national level data files) but who were not included on the
appropriate census questionnaire. Finally, this operation will include
households where the count of persons does not equal the number of
persons for which census data were provided during enumeration
II. Method of Collection
The 2006 Census Test CFU operation will be conducted in selected
locations in Travis County, Texas and the Cheyenne River Reservation
and Off Reservation Trust Land, South Dakota in two phases: telephone
and personal visit.
The telephone operation will be conducted April 21, 2006, through
August 31, 2006, with an expected workload of approximately 25,000
housing units in Travis County and approximately 400 housing units in
the Cheyenne River Reservation. During this operation, the CFU
interviewers will attempt to contact, via telephone, a portion of the
households that fall within the CFU sample that provided a telephone
number on the questionnaire. The followup interviews will be conducted
by U.S. Census Bureau staff at two of the U.S. Census Bureau's
telephone call centers, located in Jeffersonville, IN and Tucson, AZ.
These interviews will be conducted by computer-assisted telephone
interviewing (CATI). The CATI instrument will be in English, or in
Spanish for those respondents who wish to report their information in
the Spanish language. We expect an approximately 60% response rate for
the telephone operation. Nonrespondents during this operation will be
sent for personal visit followup.
The personal visit operation will be conducted July 21, 2006,
through August 31, 2006, with an expected workload of approximately
28,000 housing units in Travis County and approximately 400 housing
units in the Cheyenne River Reservation, including those nonrespondents
from the telephone operation. During this operation, enumerators will
attempt to enumerate respondents using a paper questionnaire. We expect
an approximately 90% response rate for the personal visit operation.
The purpose of the CFU telephone and personal visit contact is to
identify those persons who may have been counted in more than one
household or erroneously excluded from any household. The items
included in the 2006 CFU questionnaire are probes that are intended to
indicate whether
[[Page 48372]]
respondents understood and properly applied the residence rules
instructions on the 2006 Census Test questionnaire.
III. Data
OMB Number: Not available.
Form Number:
Type of Review: Regular.
Affected Public: Individuals or households.
Estimated Number of Respondents: Approximately 53,800 housing
units.
Estimated Time Per Response: The personal visit operation and the
telephone operation will each require approximately 10 minutes for
response.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: Approximately 8,967 hours for
the total CFU workload.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: There is no cost to respondents except
for their time to respond.
Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 of the United States Code, Sections 141
and 193.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: August 11, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-16250 Filed 8-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P