Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; Western Pacific Pelagic Fisheries; Sea Turtle Mitigation Measures, 47777-47781 [05-16117]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 156 / Monday, August 15, 2005 / Proposed Rules
proposed revisions to the NS1
guidelines was published on June 22,
2005 (70 FR 36240), with a comment
period ending date of August 22, 2005.
After receiving several requests to
extend the comment period, NMFS has
decided to extend it for another 60 days
through October 21, 2005.
This action extends the comment
period for a proposed rule that the
Office of Management and Budget
determined to be significant under
Executive Order 12866.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 600
[Docket No. 030128024–5027–02; I.D.
121002A]
RIN 0648–AQ63
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
National Standard Guidelines
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS extends the public
comment period on the proposed rule
containing revisions to the National
Standard 1 (NS1) guidelines. NMFS has
received various requests to extend the
comment period for the proposed rule
beyond its current 60-day comment
period. The extension of the comment
period for another 60 days is intended
to ensure that NMFS provides adequate
time for various stakeholders and
members of the public to comment on
the proposed revisions to the NS1
guidelines. The comment period is
extended from August 22, 2005, to
October 21, 2005.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 21, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail:
nationalstandard1@noaa.gov.
‘‘Comments on proposed rule for
National Standard 1.’’
• Mail: Mark R. Millikin, National
Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, Office
of Sustainable Fisheries, 1315 East-West
Highway, Room 13357, Silver Spring,
MD 20910 (Mark the outside of the
envelope ‘‘Comments on National
Standard 1 proposed rule’’).
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Include in the
subject line the following:
Copies of the Environmental
Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review
(EA/RIR) for this proposed rule are
available from Mark R. Millikin at the
address listed above. The EA/RIR
document is also available on the
internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
sfa/domeslfish/index.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark R. Millikin, Senior Fishery
Management Specialist, 301–713–2341,
e-mail mark.millikin@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
proposed rule that covers NMFS’
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:39 Aug 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: August 5, 2005.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–16119 Filed 8–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 050801214–5214–01; I.D.
072105B]
Fisheries Off West Coast States and in
the Western Pacific; Western Pacific
Pelagic Fisheries; Sea Turtle Mitigation
Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would set
requirements for attending protected
species workshops, for handling,
resuscitating, and releasing sea turtles
that are hooked or entangled in fishing
gear, and for fishing gear configuration.
The proposed rule is intended to reduce
and mitigate interactions between sea
turtles and vessels managed under the
Fishery Management Plan for the
Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific
Region (Pelagics FMP). This action is
being taken to comply with the terms
and conditions of a 2004 Biological
Opinion resulting from a section 7
consultation under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) on interactions
between sea turtles and fisheries
managed under the Pelagic FMP.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be received by September 14,
2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
You may submit comments
on this proposed rule or its Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA),
identified by 0648–AQ91 by any of the
following methods:
• E-mail: AQ91–Turtles@noaa.gov.
Include in the subject line of the e-mail
comment the following document
identifier: Turtle Measures. Comments
sent via e-mail, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 10
megabyte file size.
• Federal e-Rulemaking portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: William L. Robinson,
Administrator, NMFS, Pacific Islands
Region (PIR), 1601 Kapiolani Boulevard,
Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI 96814–4700.
• Fax: 808–973–2941.
Copies of the regulatory amendment
document, which includes an
Environmental Assessment (EA) and an
IRFA, may be obtained from Kitty M.
Simonds, Executive Director, Western
Pacific Fishery Management Council
(WPFMC), 1164 Bishop Street, Suite
1400, Honolulu, HI 96813, or on the
internet at www.wpcouncil.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Harman, NMFS PIR, 808–944–
2271.
ADDRESSES:
NMFS
conducted a section 7 consultation
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) on interactions between sea
turtles and fisheries managed under the
Pelagic FMP. The result of this
consultation was a Biological Opinion
that was issued on February 23, 2004
(2004 Opinion). The 2004 Opinion
concluded that the fisheries managed
under the Pelagics FMP were not likely
to jeopardize the continued existence of
sea turtles or other species listed as
threatened or endangered under the
ESA. Included in the actions considered
under the 2004 Opinion were several
measures required by a previous (15
November 2002) Biological Opinion
(2002 Opinion) on the Pelagics FMP
fisheries. These measures were vacated
on 1 April 2004, by a Federal Court
order. The requirements for general
longline permits were additional to
those pre-existing requirements for
Hawaii-based longline limited access
permit holders. Terms and conditions of
the 2004 Opinion required: (a) owners
and operators of vessels registered for
use under longline general permits to
attend protected species workshops
annually; (b) owners and operators of
vessels registered for use under longline
general permits to carry and use dip
nets, line clippers, and bolt cutters, and
follow sea turtle handling, resuscitation,
and release requirements for
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 0648–AQ91
Sfmt 4702
47777
E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM
15AUP1
47778
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 156 / Monday, August 15, 2005 / Proposed Rules
incidentally hooked or entangled sea
turtles; and (c) operators of non-longline
vessels using hooks to target pelagic
management unit species to follow sea
turtle handling, resuscitation, and
release requirements, as well as to
remove the maximum amount of the
gear possible from incidentally hooked
or entangled sea turtles.
At its 122nd meeting (March 22–25,
2004), the (Western Pacific Fishery
Management Council (WPFMC) took
initial action on the three measures
listed above by indicating its
preliminarily preferred alternatives and
recommending the development and
analysis of a full range of alternatives for
final action. The WPFMC also requested
alternatives to be developed and
analyzed for a fourth measure that
would require operators of vessels
registered for use under longline general
permits (including those that will be
registered for use under American
Samoa limited access longline permits)
to use 18/0 or larger circle hooks with
a 10 offset, mackerel-type bait, and
dehookers, when shallow-setting north
of the Equator. These requirements had
previously been implemented in the
Hawaii-based limited access longline
fishery in April 2004.
The WPFMC recommended the
inclusion of this fourth measure for two
reasons: (a) to extend the conservation
benefits derived from the use of circle
hooks, mackerel-type bait, and
dehookers, to all longline vessels
managed under the Pelagics FMP that
may shallow-set north of the Equator,
and (b) to remove incentives for owners
of Hawaii-based longline vessels to shed
their permits in favor of general permits,
to avoid using circle hooks, mackerel
bait, etc., when shallow-setting north of
the Equator. The combination of large
(size 18/0) circle hooks and mackerel
bait were shown to reduce catches of
loggerhead sea turtles by 92 percent and
leatherback turtles by 67 percent, and
improve swordfish catches 30 percent,
when used on Atlantic longline vessels
making shallow sets to target swordfish.
Circle hooks have also been found to
hook turtles predominantly in the
mouth rather than the delicate tissues of
the esophagus, thus minimizing trauma
and increasing survival rates for those
turtles that are unavoidably hooked.
Logbook data indicate that longline
fishing under longline general permits
has been concentrated south of the
Equator in U.S. exclusive economic
zone (EEZ) waters around American
Samoa, where most vessels target deepswimming albacore tuna to sell to
canneries in Pago Pago, American
Samoa. There are no domestic longline
fisheries in Guam and the
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:39 Aug 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, although there is local interest
in developing such fisheries. To date, no
longline general permit holders have
elected to target swordfish (or other
species) north of the Equator using
shallow sets. The main reason for this
is that the principal market for
swordfish in the western Pacific is
Hawaii, and to land longline caught fish
directly into Honolulu or other ports in
the State requires a Hawaii longline
limited access permit.
Vessels with longline general permits,
however, could potentially land in other
ports within and beyond the western
Pacific region. In the past, for example,
some longline vessels from the western
Pacific landed swordfish in California
ports, but this opportunity is now
closed to vessels that are not permitted
under the Pacific Fishery Management
Council’s West Coast Highly Migratory
Species Fishery Management Plan. No
western Pacific longline vessels have
opted to land fish at ports outside the
U.S.A. in Central or South America, as
the economics of doing so weigh against
this. Nonetheless, the WPFMC believed
it was prudent to anticipate the
possibility of shallow-setting north of
the Equator by vessels that are registered
for use under longline general permits,
no matter how unlikely this seems at
present. Thus, the WPFMC
recommended that owners and
operators of such vessels should be
required to employ the same sea turtle
mitigation measures as their Hawaiibased counterparts.
At its 123rd meeting (June 21–24,
2005), the WPFMC took final action and
recommended that NMFS approve and
implement regulations to require
owners and operators of vessels
registered for use under longline general
permits to: (a) attend annual protected
species workshops; (b) carry and use dip
nets, line clippers, and bolt cutters, and
follow sea turtle handling, resuscitation,
and release requirements for
incidentally-hooked or entangled sea
turtles (vessels with a freeboard of 3 ft
(0.91 m) or less are exempted from
carrying dipnets or long-handled line
clippers); and (c) use 18/0 or larger
circle hooks with a 10 offset, mackereltype bait, and dehookers, when shallowsetting north of the Equator (vessels
with a freeboard of 3 ft (0.91 m) or less
are exempted from carrying longhandled dehookers). The WPFMC also
recommended that owners and
operators of other (non-longline)
vessels, managed under the Pelagics
FMP and using hooks to target PMUS,
remove trailing gear from incidentally
hooked and entangled sea turtles, and
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
follow sea turtle handling, resuscitation,
and release requirements.
Classification
At this time, NMFS has not
determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the national standards
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act and
other applicable laws. NMFS, in making
that determination, will take into
account the data, views, and comments
received during the comment period.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The WPFMC prepared an IRFA that
describes the economic impact this
proposed rule, if adopted, would have
on small entities. A copy of the IRFA is
available from Kitty M. Simonds,
WPFMC (see ADDRESSES). A description
of the action, why it is being considered,
its objectives, and the legal basis for this
action are contained at the beginning of
this section in the preamble and in the
SUMMARY section of the preamble. A
summary of the analysis follows.
Most fishing vessels operating in the
western Pacific region under the
Pelagics FMP are owner-operated, with
few individuals holding permits for
more than one vessel. There are
estimated to be between 9,416 and
15,816 of these fishing operations (these
estimated totals may include vessels
that do not operate in EEZ waters), all
of which are believed to be small
businesses, i.e., they have gross
revenues of less than $3.5 million
annually.
Previously, all operators of longline
vessels managed under the Pelagics
FMP were required to attend protected
species workshops. This requirement
was removed when several regulations
were vacated by a U.S. District Court on
April 1, 2004 (D.D.C., Civ. No. 01–0765).
Requiring both the owners and
operators of vessels registered for use
under longline general permits to
annually attend protected species
workshops will have a minimal cost for
those who reside in Hawaii or American
Samoa, where the training workshops
are conducted. Some 15 percent of the
vessels that fish in American Samoa and
Hawaii under longline permits,
however, have owners that reside
outside of those two areas. A substantial
travel cost to attend the workshops
would be incurred by those people.
NMFS is currently accommodating the
owners and operators of Hawaii-based
vessels that live outside Hawaii by
providing interim protected species
training via computer disk, mailed to
the owner or operator. This type of
remote training and certification
E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM
15AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 156 / Monday, August 15, 2005 / Proposed Rules
relieves potential travel costs, and may
be further developed and implemented
for other owners and operators who are
not able to attend the workshops in
person.
Owners and operators of the vessels
that are registered for use under longline
general permits were previously
required to carry and use dipnets, longhandled line clippers, and bolt cutters,
so most vessels with longline general
permits already have this gear.
However, these measures were also
removed when several regulations were
vacated in the same April 1, 2004, case
cited above. If these vessels need to reequip themselves, the costs are not
expected to exceed $100 per vessel. The
WPFMC recommended that small
longline vessels such as alias (American
Samoa-based catamaran longline vessels
generally less than 40 ft (12.2 m) in
length) not be required to carry a dip net
or long-handled line clippers because,
due to the low freeboard on these boats,
operators can simply retrieve and
release the turtle from the side of the
vessel without risk of additional injury
to the animal.
The WPFMC’s recommendation to
require vessels registered under a
longline general permit to use 18/0 or
larger circle hooks with a 10 offset,
mackerel-type bait, and dehookers when
shallow-setting north of the Equator
would incur the following costs: Reequipping longlines with 18/0 circle
hooks plus swivels would cost
approximately $1.50/hook, and a large (≤
75 ft) longline vessel generally deploys
2,000–2,500 hooks/set, so the cost per
vessel of that size would be $3,000 to
$3,750. American Samoa-based longline
vessels already use mackerel-type bait
(sardine or saury (sanma)), so there
would be no additional cost for the bait
requirement for these vessels. Obtaining
approved dehookers and associated
equipment would cost about $500 per
vessel. The WPFMC recommended that
small longline vessels with a freeboard
of less than or equal to three feet not be
required to carry long-handled
dehookers because operators can more
effectively and safely use short-handled
dehookers to release sea turtles without
risk of additional injury to the animal.
Under this proposed rule, the total
cost to equip a vessel registered for use
with a longline general permit to
shallow-set north of the Equator is
estimated to be between $3,500 and
$4,250. An ongoing additional annual
replacement cost of $0.20 per hook
would also be required as circle hooks
are slightly more expensive than typical
‘‘J’’ hooks.
The WPFMC recommendation to
require operators of all vessels that use
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:39 Aug 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
hooks to target PMUS to follow sea
turtle handling, resuscitation, and
release requirements, including
removing trailing gear, is not expected
to exact any economic burden on these
fishery participants because there no
gear requirements are being proposed
for non-longline vessels, and
interactions are rare.
For each of the four measures
recommended by the WPFMC, three
alternatives were developed, so
altogether, 12 alternatives were
considered. The alternatives considered
for the measure regarding protected
species workshop attendance by owners
and of operators vessels registered for
use under longline general permits
were: (a) no action maintaining the
status quo; (b) requiring annual
attendance by only vessel operators; and
(c) requiring annual attendance by both
vessel owners and operators.
The alternatives considered for the
measure regarding sea turtle mitigation
gear (i.e., dip nets, line clippers, bolt
cutters) and handling, resuscitation, and
release requirements were: (a) no action
maintaining the status quo; (b) requiring
owners and operators of vessels
registered under a longline general
permit to carry and use dip nets, line
clippers, and bolt cutters, as well as
follow handling, resuscitation, and
release requirements for hooked or
entangled sea turtles (vessels with 3 ft
(0.91 m) of freeboard or less would be
exempt from carrying dip nets or longhandled line clippers;) and (c) requiring
owners and operators of vessels
registered under a longline general
permit to carry and use dip nets, line
clippers, and bolt cutters, as well as
follow handling, resuscitation, and
release requirements for hooked or
entangled sea turtles with no
exemptions for longline vessels with
freeboard less than three ft (0.91 m).
The alternatives for the measure
regarding vessels that use hooks to
target pelagic management unit species
were: (a) no action maintaining the
status quo; (b) requiring vessel owners
and operators to follow sea turtle
handling, resuscitation, and release
requirements, including the removal of
trailing gear from a hooked or entangled
sea turtle when fishing in the EEZ of the
western Pacific region; and (c) requiring
vessel owners and operators to follow
sea turtle handling, resuscitation, and
release requirements, including the
removal of trailing gear, wherever they
fish.
The alternatives for the measure
regarding gear and bait requirements for
owners and operators of vessels
registered for use under a longline
general permit that may shallow-set
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47779
north of the Equator were: (a) no action
maintaining the status quo; (b) requiring
owners and operators to use 18/0 or
larger circle hooks with 10 offset,
mackerel-type bait, and dehookers when
shallow-setting north of the Equator;
and (c) prohibiting shallow-setting north
of the Equator by vessels registered
under longline general permits.
The following alternative was
preferred in the IRFA because it best
complied with the terms and conditions
of the 2004 Biological Opinion: (a)
requiring annual workshop attendance
by both owners and operators; (b)
requiring owners and operators of
vessels registered for use under a
longline general permit to carry and use
dip nets, line clippers, and bolt cutters,
as well as to follow handling,
resuscitation, and release requirements
for hooked or entangled sea turtles
(vessels with 3 ft (0.91 m) of freeboard
or less would be exempted from
carrying dip nets or long-handled line
clippers); (c) requiring longline vessel
owners and operators to follow sea
turtle handling, resuscitation, and
release requirements, including the
removal of trailing gear wherever they
fish; and (d) requiring longline vessels
owners and operators to use 18/0 or
larger circle hooks with 10 offset,
mackerel-type bait, and dehookers when
shallow-setting north of the Equator
(vessels with 3 ft (0.91 m) of freeboard
or less would not be required to carry
long handled dehookers).
The inclusion of existing text on turtle
handling requirements from 50 CFR
660.32 (c) and (d), which is largely
duplicative of text in 50 CFR 223.206,
is necessary because 50 CFR 223.206
only applies to threatened species of sea
turtles. This proposed rule would
extend those handling requirements to
interactions between Pelagics FMP
fishing vessels and all species of sea
turtles. To the extent practicable, it has
been determined that there are no other
Federal rules that may duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and
procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaiian Natives,
Indians, Northern Mariana Islands,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM
15AUP1
47780
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 156 / Monday, August 15, 2005 / Proposed Rules
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES AND IN THE
WESTERN PACIFIC
1. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 660.22, paragraphs (ff), (gg),
(ii), (ll), (nn), and (oo) are revised to
read as follows:
§ 660.22
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(ff) Own or operate a vessel registered
for use under any longline permit issued
under § 660.21 while engaged in
longline fishing for Pelagic Management
Unit Species and fail to be certified for
completion of a NMFS protected species
workshop, in violation of § 660.34(a).
(gg) Own or operate a vessel registered
for use under any longline permit issued
under § 660.21 while engaged in
longline fishing for Pelagic Management
Unit Species without having on board a
valid protected species workshop
certificate issued by NMFS or a legible
copy thereof, in violation of § 660.34(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Fail to carry, or fail to use, a line
clipper, dip net, or dehooker on a vessel
registered for use under any longline
permit issued under § 660.21, in
violation of § 660.32.
*
*
*
*
*
(ll) When operating a vessel registered
for use under any longline permit issued
under § 660.21 or operating a vessel
using hooks to target Pelagic
Management Unit Species while fishing
under the Pelagics FMP, fail to comply
with the sea turtle handling
requirements, in violation of § 660.32(b).
(nn) Engage in shallow-setting from a
vessel registered for use under any
longline permit issued under § 660.21
north of the Equator (0° lat.) with hooks
other than offset circle hooks sized 18/
0 or larger, with a 10 offset, in violation
of § 660.33(f).
(oo) Engage in shallow-setting from a
vessel registered for use under any
longline permit issued under § 660.21
north of the Equator (0° lat.) with bait
other than mackerel-type bait, in
violation of § 660.33(g).
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 660.32, paragraphs (a)(2)
through (a)(4) are redesignated as
paragraphs (a)(4) through (a)(6);
introductory text is added to paragraph
(a); paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) are revised;
new paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) are
added; and paragraphs (c) and (d) are
removed to read as follows:
§ 660.32
Sea turtle mitigation measures.
(a) Possession and use of required
mitigation gear. The gear required in
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:39 Aug 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
paragraph (a) of this section must be
used according to the sea turtle
handling requirements set forth in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(1) Hawaii longline limited access
permits. Any owner or operator of a
vessel registered for use under a Hawaii
longline limited access permit must
carry aboard the vessel line clippers
meeting the minimum design standards
specified in paragraph (a)(5) of this
section, dip nets meeting the minimum
design standards specified in paragraph
(a)(6) of this section, and dehookers
meeting the minimum design and
performance standards specified in
paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
(2) Other longline vessels with a
freeboard of more than 3 ft (0.91m). Any
owner or operator of a longline vessel
with a permit issued under § 660.21
other than a Hawaii limited access
longline permit and that has a freeboard
of more than 3 ft (0.91 m) must carry
aboard the vessel line clippers meeting
the minimum design standards
specified in paragraph (a)(5) of this
section, dip nets meeting the minimum
design standards specified in paragraph
(a)(6) of this section, and dehookers
meeting ths minimum design and
performance standards specified in
paragraph (a)(7) of this section.
(3) Other longline vessels with a
freeboard of 3 ft (0.91 m) or less. Any
owner or operator of a longline vessel
with a permit issued under § 660.21
other than a Hawaii limited access
longline permit and that has a freeboard
of more than 3 ft (0.91 m) must carry
aboard their vessels line clippers
capable of cutting the vessels fishing
line or leader within approximately 1 ft
(0.3 m) of the eye of an embedded hook,
as well as wire or bolt cutters capable
of cutting through the vessel’s hooks.
(4) Handline, troll, pole-and-line, and
other vessels using hooks other than
longline vessels. Any owner or operator
of a vessel fishing under the Pelagics
FMP with hooks other than longline
gear are not required to carry specific
mitigation gear, but must comply with
the handling requirements set forth in
paragraph (b) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Handling requirements. If a sea
turtle is observed to be hooked or
entangled in fishing gear from any
vessel fishing under the Pelagics FMP,
vessel owners and operators must use
the required mitigation gear set forth in
subsection (a) to comply with these
handling requirements. Any hooked or
entangled sea turtle must be handled in
a manner to minimize injury and
promote survival.
(1) Sea turtles that cannot be brought
aboard. In instances where a sea turtle
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
is too large to be brought aboard or the
sea turtle cannot be brought aboard
without causing further injury to the sea
turtle, the vessel owner or operator must
disentangle and remove the gear, or cut
the line as close as possible to the hook
or entanglement, to remove the
maximum amount of the gear from the
sea turtle.
(2) Sea turtles that can be brought
aboard. In instances where a sea turtle
is not too large to be brought aboard, or
the sea turtle can be brought aboard
without causing further injury to the
turtle, the vessel owner or operator must
take the following actions:
(i) Immediately bring the sea turtle
aboard;
(ii) Handle the sea turtle in
accordance with the procedures in
paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of this
section; and
(iii) Disentangle and remove the gear,
or cut the line as close as possible to the
hook or entanglement, to remove the
maximum amount of the gear from the
sea turtle.
(3) Sea turtle resuscitation. If a sea
turtle appears dead or comatose, the
following actions must be taken:
(i) Place the sea turtle on its belly (on
the bottom shell or plastron) so that the
sea turtle is right side up and its
hindquarters elevated at least 6 inches
(15.24 cm) for a period of no less than
4 hours and no more than 24 hours. The
amount of the elevation varies with the
size of the sea turtle; greater elevations
are needed for larger sea turtles;
(ii) Administer a reflex test at least
once every 3 hours. The test is to be
performed by gently touching the eye
and pinching the tail of a sea turtle to
determine if the sea turtle is responsive;
(iii) Keep the sea turtle shaded and
damp or moist (but under no
circumstances place the sea turtle into
a container holding water). A watersoaked towel placed over the eyes,
carapace and flippers is the most
effective method of keeping a sea turtle
moist; and
(iv) Return to the sea any sea turtle
that revives and becomes active in the
manner described in paragraph (b)(4) of
this section. Sea turtles that fail to
revive within the 24–hour period must
also be returned to the sea in the
manner described in paragraph (b)(4) of
this section.
(4) Sea turtle release. After handling
a sea turtle in accordance with the
requirements of paragraphs (b)(2) and
(b)(3) of this section, the sea turtle must
be returned to the ocean after
identification unless NMFS requests the
retention of a dead sea turtle for
research. In releasing a sea turtle the
vessel owner or operator must:
E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM
15AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 156 / Monday, August 15, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(i) Place the vessel engine in neutral
gear so that the propeller is disengaged
and the vessel is stopped, and release
the sea turtle away from deployed gear;
and
(ii) Observe that the turtle is safely
away from the vessel before engaging
the propeller and continuing operations.
(5) Other sea turtle requirements. No
sea turtle, including a dead turtle, may
be consumed or sold. A sea turtle may
be landed, offloaded, transhipped or
kept below deck only if NMFS requests
the retention of a dead sea turtle for
research.
4. In § 660.33, paragraphs (f) and (g)
are revised to read as follows:
§ 660.33 Western Pacific longline fishing
restrictions.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Any owner or operator of a vessel
registered for use under any longline
permit issued under § 660.21 must use
only offset circle hooks sized 18/0 or
larger, with a 10° offset, when shallowsetting north of the Equator (0° lat.). As
used in this paragraph, an offset circle
hook sized 18/0 or larger is one with an
outer diameter at its widest point is no
smaller than 1.97 inches (50 mm) when
measured with the eye of the hook on
the vertical axis (y-axis) and
perpendicular to the horizontal axis (xaxis). As used in this paragraph, a 10°
offset is measured from the barbed end
of the hook and is relative to the parallel
plane of the eyed-end, or shank, of the
hook when laid on its side.
(g) Any owner or operator of a vessel
registered for use under any longline
permit issued under § 660.21 must use
only mackerel-type bait when shallowsetting north of the Equator (0° lat.). As
used in this paragraph, mackerel-type
bait means a whole fusiform fish with
a predominantly blue, green or gray
back and predominantly gray, silver or
white lower sides and belly.
*
*
*
*
*
5. In § 660.34, paragraphs (a), (c) and
(d) are revised to read as follows:
§ 660.34
Protected species workshops.
(a) Each year, both the owner and the
operator of a vessel registered for use
under any longline permit issued under
§ 660.21 must attend and be certified for
completion of a workshop conducted by
NMFS on interaction mitigation
techniques for sea turtles, seabirds and
other protected species.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) An owner of a vessel registered for
use under any longline permit issued
under § 660.21 must have a valid
protected species workshop certificate
issued by NMFS to the owner of the
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:39 Aug 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
vessel, in order to maintain or renew
their vessel registration.
(d) An owner and an operator of a
vessel registered for use under any
longline permit issued under § 660.21
must have on board the vessel a valid
protected species workshop certificate
issued by NMFS to the operator of the
vessel, or a legible copy thereof.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–16117 Filed 8–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 050801212–5212–01; I.D.
072805A]
RIN 0648–AT52
Fisheries off West Coast States and in
the Western Pacific; Western Pacific
Pelagic Fisheries; Control Date for
Non-Longline Commercial Pelagic
Fisheries in EEZ around Hawaii
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; advance notice of
proposed rulemaking; notification of
control date.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS announces that
persons who enter the non-longline
commercial pelagic fisheries (e.g., troll,
handline, pole and line, etc.) in the U.S.
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) around
the Hawaiian Islands after June 2, 2005
(‘‘control date’’) are not guaranteed
future participation in the fishery if the
Western Pacific Fishery Management
Council (WPFMC) recommends, and
NMFS approves, a program limiting
entry or effort. This action does not
commit the WPFMC or NMFS to limit
entry, or prevent any other date from
being selected for eligibility to
participate in the non-longline
commercial pelagic fisheries. The
WPFMC or NMFS may also use other
criteria to limit fishing effort or
participation in a limited entry program
that is developed in the future.
DATES: Comments must be submitted in
writing by October 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document identified by I.D.
072805A by any of the following
methods:
• E-mail: AT52–
HawaiiDate@noaa.gov. Include I.D.
072805A in the subject line of the e-mail
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47781
comment following document identifier:
Hawaii non-longline control date.
Comments sent via e-mail, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 10
megabyte file size.
• Federal e-Rulemaking portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: William L. Robinson,
Administrator, NMFS Pacific Islands
Region (PIR), 1601 Kapiolani Blvd.,
Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI 96814.
• Fax: 808–973–2941
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Harman, NMFS PIR, at 808–944–
2271.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 2,
2005, at its 127th meeting, the WPFMC
recommended a ‘‘control date’’ of June
2, 2005, applicable to persons who are
contemplating entering the non-longline
commercial fisheries for pelagic species
(i.e., troll, handline, pole and line,
other) in the U.S. exclusive economic
zone (EEZ) around Hawaii. The WPFMC
requested that this control date be
published in the Federal Register to
notify fishermen that if they enter these
fisheries after June 2, 2005, they may
not be assured of future access if the
WPFMC and/or NMFS decide to limit
entry or impose other measures to
manage these fisheries.
Establishment of a control date
responds to NMFS’ notice to the
WPFMC, dated December 30, 2004 (69
FR 78397), that overfishing is occurring
Pacific-wide on bigeye tuna, and that
management action must be taken by
the WPFMC to end this overfishing. The
WPFMC tentatively has determined that
a limited access program in the U.S.
EEZ around Hawaii might be one of the
viable mechanisms to reduce fishing
mortality in Pacific bigeye tuna, as a
step toward ending overfishing in the
pelagic fisheries.
The State of Hawaii maintains a
registry of commercial pelagic
fishermen, as required by state
regulations. In 2003, some 2,037 people
were registered as commercial pelagic
fishermen. Of these, 1,681 (83 percent)
were non-longline fishermen. Most of
these non-longline pelagic fishermen
were active in the EEZ and, thus,
represent an estimate of fishermen who
could be affected by this control date.
Based on the state’s 2003 commercial
fishing data reported by fishermen, the
total catch of pelagic species in Hawaii
was 22.6 million lb (10,251 mt), of
which 5.2 million lb (2,359 mt)(23
percent) was made by non-longline
small-boat pelagic methods. The entire
pelagic fishery landed fish with an exvessel value of $47.9 million, of which
E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM
15AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 156 (Monday, August 15, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47777-47781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16117]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 050801214-5214-01; I.D. 072105B]
RIN 0648-AQ91
Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific;
Western Pacific Pelagic Fisheries; Sea Turtle Mitigation Measures
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would set requirements for attending
protected species workshops, for handling, resuscitating, and releasing
sea turtles that are hooked or entangled in fishing gear, and for
fishing gear configuration. The proposed rule is intended to reduce and
mitigate interactions between sea turtles and vessels managed under the
Fishery Management Plan for the Pelagic Fisheries of the Western
Pacific Region (Pelagics FMP). This action is being taken to comply
with the terms and conditions of a 2004 Biological Opinion resulting
from a section 7 consultation under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) on
interactions between sea turtles and fisheries managed under the
Pelagic FMP.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received by September 14,
2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this proposed rule or its Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), identified by 0648-AQ91 by any
of the following methods:
E-mail: AQ91-Turtles@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line
of the e-mail comment the following document identifier: Turtle
Measures. Comments sent via e-mail, including all attachments, must not
exceed a 10 megabyte file size.
Federal e-Rulemaking portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: William L. Robinson, Administrator, NMFS, Pacific
Islands Region (PIR), 1601 Kapiolani Boulevard, Suite 1110, Honolulu,
HI 96814-4700.
Fax: 808-973-2941.
Copies of the regulatory amendment document, which includes an
Environmental Assessment (EA) and an IRFA, may be obtained from Kitty
M. Simonds, Executive Director, Western Pacific Fishery Management
Council (WPFMC), 1164 Bishop Street, Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96813, or
on the internet at www.wpcouncil.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Harman, NMFS PIR, 808-944-2271.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS conducted a section 7 consultation
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) on interactions between sea
turtles and fisheries managed under the Pelagic FMP. The result of this
consultation was a Biological Opinion that was issued on February 23,
2004 (2004 Opinion). The 2004 Opinion concluded that the fisheries
managed under the Pelagics FMP were not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of sea turtles or other species listed as
threatened or endangered under the ESA. Included in the actions
considered under the 2004 Opinion were several measures required by a
previous (15 November 2002) Biological Opinion (2002 Opinion) on the
Pelagics FMP fisheries. These measures were vacated on 1 April 2004, by
a Federal Court order. The requirements for general longline permits
were additional to those pre-existing requirements for Hawaii-based
longline limited access permit holders. Terms and conditions of the
2004 Opinion required: (a) owners and operators of vessels registered
for use under longline general permits to attend protected species
workshops annually; (b) owners and operators of vessels registered for
use under longline general permits to carry and use dip nets, line
clippers, and bolt cutters, and follow sea turtle handling,
resuscitation, and release requirements for
[[Page 47778]]
incidentally hooked or entangled sea turtles; and (c) operators of non-
longline vessels using hooks to target pelagic management unit species
to follow sea turtle handling, resuscitation, and release requirements,
as well as to remove the maximum amount of the gear possible from
incidentally hooked or entangled sea turtles.
At its 122nd meeting (March 22-25, 2004), the (Western Pacific
Fishery Management Council (WPFMC) took initial action on the three
measures listed above by indicating its preliminarily preferred
alternatives and recommending the development and analysis of a full
range of alternatives for final action. The WPFMC also requested
alternatives to be developed and analyzed for a fourth measure that
would require operators of vessels registered for use under longline
general permits (including those that will be registered for use under
American Samoa limited access longline permits) to use 18/0 or larger
circle hooks with a 10 offset, mackerel-type bait, and dehookers, when
shallow-setting north of the Equator. These requirements had previously
been implemented in the Hawaii-based limited access longline fishery in
April 2004.
The WPFMC recommended the inclusion of this fourth measure for two
reasons: (a) to extend the conservation benefits derived from the use
of circle hooks, mackerel-type bait, and dehookers, to all longline
vessels managed under the Pelagics FMP that may shallow-set north of
the Equator, and (b) to remove incentives for owners of Hawaii-based
longline vessels to shed their permits in favor of general permits, to
avoid using circle hooks, mackerel bait, etc., when shallow-setting
north of the Equator. The combination of large (size 18/0) circle hooks
and mackerel bait were shown to reduce catches of loggerhead sea
turtles by 92 percent and leatherback turtles by 67 percent, and
improve swordfish catches 30 percent, when used on Atlantic longline
vessels making shallow sets to target swordfish. Circle hooks have also
been found to hook turtles predominantly in the mouth rather than the
delicate tissues of the esophagus, thus minimizing trauma and
increasing survival rates for those turtles that are unavoidably
hooked.
Logbook data indicate that longline fishing under longline general
permits has been concentrated south of the Equator in U.S. exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) waters around American Samoa, where most vessels
target deep-swimming albacore tuna to sell to canneries in Pago Pago,
American Samoa. There are no domestic longline fisheries in Guam and
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, although there is
local interest in developing such fisheries. To date, no longline
general permit holders have elected to target swordfish (or other
species) north of the Equator using shallow sets. The main reason for
this is that the principal market for swordfish in the western Pacific
is Hawaii, and to land longline caught fish directly into Honolulu or
other ports in the State requires a Hawaii longline limited access
permit.
Vessels with longline general permits, however, could potentially
land in other ports within and beyond the western Pacific region. In
the past, for example, some longline vessels from the western Pacific
landed swordfish in California ports, but this opportunity is now
closed to vessels that are not permitted under the Pacific Fishery
Management Council's West Coast Highly Migratory Species Fishery
Management Plan. No western Pacific longline vessels have opted to land
fish at ports outside the U.S.A. in Central or South America, as the
economics of doing so weigh against this. Nonetheless, the WPFMC
believed it was prudent to anticipate the possibility of shallow-
setting north of the Equator by vessels that are registered for use
under longline general permits, no matter how unlikely this seems at
present. Thus, the WPFMC recommended that owners and operators of such
vessels should be required to employ the same sea turtle mitigation
measures as their Hawaii-based counterparts.
At its 123rd meeting (June 21-24, 2005), the WPFMC took final
action and recommended that NMFS approve and implement regulations to
require owners and operators of vessels registered for use under
longline general permits to: (a) attend annual protected species
workshops; (b) carry and use dip nets, line clippers, and bolt cutters,
and follow sea turtle handling, resuscitation, and release requirements
for incidentally-hooked or entangled sea turtles (vessels with a
freeboard of 3 ft (0.91 m) or less are exempted from carrying dipnets
or long-handled line clippers); and (c) use 18/0 or larger circle hooks
with a 10 offset, mackerel-type bait, and dehookers, when shallow-
setting north of the Equator (vessels with a freeboard of 3 ft (0.91 m)
or less are exempted from carrying long-handled dehookers). The WPFMC
also recommended that owners and operators of other (non-longline)
vessels, managed under the Pelagics FMP and using hooks to target PMUS,
remove trailing gear from incidentally hooked and entangled sea
turtles, and follow sea turtle handling, resuscitation, and release
requirements.
Classification
At this time, NMFS has not determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the national standards of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act and other applicable laws. NMFS, in
making that determination, will take into account the data, views, and
comments received during the comment period.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The WPFMC prepared an IRFA that describes the economic impact this
proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A copy of the
IRFA is available from Kitty M. Simonds, WPFMC (see ADDRESSES). A
description of the action, why it is being considered, its objectives,
and the legal basis for this action are contained at the beginning of
this section in the preamble and in the SUMMARY section of the
preamble. A summary of the analysis follows.
Most fishing vessels operating in the western Pacific region under
the Pelagics FMP are owner-operated, with few individuals holding
permits for more than one vessel. There are estimated to be between
9,416 and 15,816 of these fishing operations (these estimated totals
may include vessels that do not operate in EEZ waters), all of which
are believed to be small businesses, i.e., they have gross revenues of
less than $3.5 million annually.
Previously, all operators of longline vessels managed under the
Pelagics FMP were required to attend protected species workshops. This
requirement was removed when several regulations were vacated by a U.S.
District Court on April 1, 2004 (D.D.C., Civ. No. 01-0765). Requiring
both the owners and operators of vessels registered for use under
longline general permits to annually attend protected species workshops
will have a minimal cost for those who reside in Hawaii or American
Samoa, where the training workshops are conducted. Some 15 percent of
the vessels that fish in American Samoa and Hawaii under longline
permits, however, have owners that reside outside of those two areas. A
substantial travel cost to attend the workshops would be incurred by
those people. NMFS is currently accommodating the owners and operators
of Hawaii-based vessels that live outside Hawaii by providing interim
protected species training via computer disk, mailed to the owner or
operator. This type of remote training and certification
[[Page 47779]]
relieves potential travel costs, and may be further developed and
implemented for other owners and operators who are not able to attend
the workshops in person.
Owners and operators of the vessels that are registered for use
under longline general permits were previously required to carry and
use dipnets, long-handled line clippers, and bolt cutters, so most
vessels with longline general permits already have this gear. However,
these measures were also removed when several regulations were vacated
in the same April 1, 2004, case cited above. If these vessels need to
re-equip themselves, the costs are not expected to exceed $100 per
vessel. The WPFMC recommended that small longline vessels such as alias
(American Samoa-based catamaran longline vessels generally less than 40
ft (12.2 m) in length) not be required to carry a dip net or long-
handled line clippers because, due to the low freeboard on these boats,
operators can simply retrieve and release the turtle from the side of
the vessel without risk of additional injury to the animal.
The WPFMC's recommendation to require vessels registered under a
longline general permit to use 18/0 or larger circle hooks with a 10
offset, mackerel-type bait, and dehookers when shallow-setting north of
the Equator would incur the following costs: Re-equipping longlines
with 18/0 circle hooks plus swivels would cost approximately $1.50/
hook, and a large (> 75 ft) longline vessel generally deploys 2,000-
2,500 hooks/set, so the cost per vessel of that size would be $3,000 to
$3,750. American Samoa-based longline vessels already use mackerel-type
bait (sardine or saury (sanma)), so there would be no additional cost
for the bait requirement for these vessels. Obtaining approved
dehookers and associated equipment would cost about $500 per vessel.
The WPFMC recommended that small longline vessels with a freeboard of
less than or equal to three feet not be required to carry long-handled
dehookers because operators can more effectively and safely use short-
handled dehookers to release sea turtles without risk of additional
injury to the animal.
Under this proposed rule, the total cost to equip a vessel
registered for use with a longline general permit to shallow-set north
of the Equator is estimated to be between $3,500 and $4,250. An ongoing
additional annual replacement cost of $0.20 per hook would also be
required as circle hooks are slightly more expensive than typical ``J''
hooks.
The WPFMC recommendation to require operators of all vessels that
use hooks to target PMUS to follow sea turtle handling, resuscitation,
and release requirements, including removing trailing gear, is not
expected to exact any economic burden on these fishery participants
because there no gear requirements are being proposed for non-longline
vessels, and interactions are rare.
For each of the four measures recommended by the WPFMC, three
alternatives were developed, so altogether, 12 alternatives were
considered. The alternatives considered for the measure regarding
protected species workshop attendance by owners and of operators
vessels registered for use under longline general permits were: (a) no
action maintaining the status quo; (b) requiring annual attendance by
only vessel operators; and (c) requiring annual attendance by both
vessel owners and operators.
The alternatives considered for the measure regarding sea turtle
mitigation gear (i.e., dip nets, line clippers, bolt cutters) and
handling, resuscitation, and release requirements were: (a) no action
maintaining the status quo; (b) requiring owners and operators of
vessels registered under a longline general permit to carry and use dip
nets, line clippers, and bolt cutters, as well as follow handling,
resuscitation, and release requirements for hooked or entangled sea
turtles (vessels with 3 ft (0.91 m) of freeboard or less would be
exempt from carrying dip nets or long-handled line clippers;) and (c)
requiring owners and operators of vessels registered under a longline
general permit to carry and use dip nets, line clippers, and bolt
cutters, as well as follow handling, resuscitation, and release
requirements for hooked or entangled sea turtles with no exemptions for
longline vessels with freeboard less than three ft (0.91 m).
The alternatives for the measure regarding vessels that use hooks
to target pelagic management unit species were: (a) no action
maintaining the status quo; (b) requiring vessel owners and operators
to follow sea turtle handling, resuscitation, and release requirements,
including the removal of trailing gear from a hooked or entangled sea
turtle when fishing in the EEZ of the western Pacific region; and (c)
requiring vessel owners and operators to follow sea turtle handling,
resuscitation, and release requirements, including the removal of
trailing gear, wherever they fish.
The alternatives for the measure regarding gear and bait
requirements for owners and operators of vessels registered for use
under a longline general permit that may shallow-set north of the
Equator were: (a) no action maintaining the status quo; (b) requiring
owners and operators to use 18/0 or larger circle hooks with 10 offset,
mackerel-type bait, and dehookers when shallow-setting north of the
Equator; and (c) prohibiting shallow-setting north of the Equator by
vessels registered under longline general permits.
The following alternative was preferred in the IRFA because it best
complied with the terms and conditions of the 2004 Biological Opinion:
(a) requiring annual workshop attendance by both owners and operators;
(b) requiring owners and operators of vessels registered for use under
a longline general permit to carry and use dip nets, line clippers, and
bolt cutters, as well as to follow handling, resuscitation, and release
requirements for hooked or entangled sea turtles (vessels with 3 ft
(0.91 m) of freeboard or less would be exempted from carrying dip nets
or long-handled line clippers); (c) requiring longline vessel owners
and operators to follow sea turtle handling, resuscitation, and release
requirements, including the removal of trailing gear wherever they
fish; and (d) requiring longline vessels owners and operators to use
18/0 or larger circle hooks with 10 offset, mackerel-type bait, and
dehookers when shallow-setting north of the Equator (vessels with 3 ft
(0.91 m) of freeboard or less would not be required to carry long
handled dehookers).
The inclusion of existing text on turtle handling requirements from
50 CFR 660.32 (c) and (d), which is largely duplicative of text in 50
CFR 223.206, is necessary because 50 CFR 223.206 only applies to
threatened species of sea turtles. This proposed rule would extend
those handling requirements to interactions between Pelagics FMP
fishing vessels and all species of sea turtles. To the extent
practicable, it has been determined that there are no other Federal
rules that may duplicate, overlap or conflict with this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaiian Natives, Indians, Northern Mariana Islands,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
[[Page 47780]]
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES AND IN THE WESTERN
PACIFIC
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 660.22, paragraphs (ff), (gg), (ii), (ll), (nn), and
(oo) are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 660.22 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(ff) Own or operate a vessel registered for use under any longline
permit issued under Sec. 660.21 while engaged in longline fishing for
Pelagic Management Unit Species and fail to be certified for completion
of a NMFS protected species workshop, in violation of Sec. 660.34(a).
(gg) Own or operate a vessel registered for use under any longline
permit issued under Sec. 660.21 while engaged in longline fishing for
Pelagic Management Unit Species without having on board a valid
protected species workshop certificate issued by NMFS or a legible copy
thereof, in violation of Sec. 660.34(d).
* * * * *
(ii) Fail to carry, or fail to use, a line clipper, dip net, or
dehooker on a vessel registered for use under any longline permit
issued under Sec. 660.21, in violation of Sec. 660.32.
* * * * *
(ll) When operating a vessel registered for use under any longline
permit issued under Sec. 660.21 or operating a vessel using hooks to
target Pelagic Management Unit Species while fishing under the Pelagics
FMP, fail to comply with the sea turtle handling requirements, in
violation of Sec. 660.32(b).
(nn) Engage in shallow-setting from a vessel registered for use
under any longline permit issued under Sec. 660.21 north of the
Equator (0[deg] lat.) with hooks other than offset circle hooks sized
18/0 or larger, with a 10 offset, in violation of Sec. 660.33(f).
(oo) Engage in shallow-setting from a vessel registered for use
under any longline permit issued under Sec. 660.21 north of the
Equator (0[deg] lat.) with bait other than mackerel-type bait, in
violation of Sec. 660.33(g).
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 660.32, paragraphs (a)(2) through (a)(4) are
redesignated as paragraphs (a)(4) through (a)(6); introductory text is
added to paragraph (a); paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) are revised; new
paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) are added; and paragraphs (c) and (d) are
removed to read as follows:
Sec. 660.32 Sea turtle mitigation measures.
(a) Possession and use of required mitigation gear. The gear
required in paragraph (a) of this section must be used according to the
sea turtle handling requirements set forth in paragraph (b) of this
section.
(1) Hawaii longline limited access permits. Any owner or operator
of a vessel registered for use under a Hawaii longline limited access
permit must carry aboard the vessel line clippers meeting the minimum
design standards specified in paragraph (a)(5) of this section, dip
nets meeting the minimum design standards specified in paragraph (a)(6)
of this section, and dehookers meeting the minimum design and
performance standards specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
(2) Other longline vessels with a freeboard of more than 3 ft
(0.91m). Any owner or operator of a longline vessel with a permit
issued under Sec. 660.21 other than a Hawaii limited access longline
permit and that has a freeboard of more than 3 ft (0.91 m) must carry
aboard the vessel line clippers meeting the minimum design standards
specified in paragraph (a)(5) of this section, dip nets meeting the
minimum design standards specified in paragraph (a)(6) of this section,
and dehookers meeting ths minimum design and performance standards
specified in paragraph (a)(7) of this section.
(3) Other longline vessels with a freeboard of 3 ft (0.91 m) or
less. Any owner or operator of a longline vessel with a permit issued
under Sec. 660.21 other than a Hawaii limited access longline permit
and that has a freeboard of more than 3 ft (0.91 m) must carry aboard
their vessels line clippers capable of cutting the vessels fishing line
or leader within approximately 1 ft (0.3 m) of the eye of an embedded
hook, as well as wire or bolt cutters capable of cutting through the
vessel's hooks.
(4) Handline, troll, pole-and-line, and other vessels using hooks
other than longline vessels. Any owner or operator of a vessel fishing
under the Pelagics FMP with hooks other than longline gear are not
required to carry specific mitigation gear, but must comply with the
handling requirements set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.
* * * * *
(b) Handling requirements. If a sea turtle is observed to be hooked
or entangled in fishing gear from any vessel fishing under the Pelagics
FMP, vessel owners and operators must use the required mitigation gear
set forth in subsection (a) to comply with these handling requirements.
Any hooked or entangled sea turtle must be handled in a manner to
minimize injury and promote survival.
(1) Sea turtles that cannot be brought aboard. In instances where a
sea turtle is too large to be brought aboard or the sea turtle cannot
be brought aboard without causing further injury to the sea turtle, the
vessel owner or operator must disentangle and remove the gear, or cut
the line as close as possible to the hook or entanglement, to remove
the maximum amount of the gear from the sea turtle.
(2) Sea turtles that can be brought aboard. In instances where a
sea turtle is not too large to be brought aboard, or the sea turtle can
be brought aboard without causing further injury to the turtle, the
vessel owner or operator must take the following actions:
(i) Immediately bring the sea turtle aboard;
(ii) Handle the sea turtle in accordance with the procedures in
paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of this section; and
(iii) Disentangle and remove the gear, or cut the line as close as
possible to the hook or entanglement, to remove the maximum amount of
the gear from the sea turtle.
(3) Sea turtle resuscitation. If a sea turtle appears dead or
comatose, the following actions must be taken:
(i) Place the sea turtle on its belly (on the bottom shell or
plastron) so that the sea turtle is right side up and its hindquarters
elevated at least 6 inches (15.24 cm) for a period of no less than 4
hours and no more than 24 hours. The amount of the elevation varies
with the size of the sea turtle; greater elevations are needed for
larger sea turtles;
(ii) Administer a reflex test at least once every 3 hours. The test
is to be performed by gently touching the eye and pinching the tail of
a sea turtle to determine if the sea turtle is responsive;
(iii) Keep the sea turtle shaded and damp or moist (but under no
circumstances place the sea turtle into a container holding water). A
water-soaked towel placed over the eyes, carapace and flippers is the
most effective method of keeping a sea turtle moist; and
(iv) Return to the sea any sea turtle that revives and becomes
active in the manner described in paragraph (b)(4) of this section. Sea
turtles that fail to revive within the 24-hour period must also be
returned to the sea in the manner described in paragraph (b)(4) of this
section.
(4) Sea turtle release. After handling a sea turtle in accordance
with the requirements of paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section,
the sea turtle must be returned to the ocean after identification
unless NMFS requests the retention of a dead sea turtle for research.
In releasing a sea turtle the vessel owner or operator must:
[[Page 47781]]
(i) Place the vessel engine in neutral gear so that the propeller
is disengaged and the vessel is stopped, and release the sea turtle
away from deployed gear; and
(ii) Observe that the turtle is safely away from the vessel before
engaging the propeller and continuing operations.
(5) Other sea turtle requirements. No sea turtle, including a dead
turtle, may be consumed or sold. A sea turtle may be landed, offloaded,
transhipped or kept below deck only if NMFS requests the retention of a
dead sea turtle for research.
4. In Sec. 660.33, paragraphs (f) and (g) are revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 660.33 Western Pacific longline fishing restrictions.
* * * * *
(f) Any owner or operator of a vessel registered for use under any
longline permit issued under Sec. 660.21 must use only offset circle
hooks sized 18/0 or larger, with a 10[deg] offset, when shallow-setting
north of the Equator (0[deg] lat.). As used in this paragraph, an
offset circle hook sized 18/0 or larger is one with an outer diameter
at its widest point is no smaller than 1.97 inches (50 mm) when
measured with the eye of the hook on the vertical axis (y-axis) and
perpendicular to the horizontal axis (x-axis). As used in this
paragraph, a 10[deg] offset is measured from the barbed end of the hook
and is relative to the parallel plane of the eyed-end, or shank, of the
hook when laid on its side.
(g) Any owner or operator of a vessel registered for use under any
longline permit issued under Sec. 660.21 must use only mackerel-type
bait when shallow-setting north of the Equator (0[deg] lat.). As used
in this paragraph, mackerel-type bait means a whole fusiform fish with
a predominantly blue, green or gray back and predominantly gray, silver
or white lower sides and belly.
* * * * *
5. In Sec. 660.34, paragraphs (a), (c) and (d) are revised to read
as follows:
Sec. 660.34 Protected species workshops.
(a) Each year, both the owner and the operator of a vessel
registered for use under any longline permit issued under Sec. 660.21
must attend and be certified for completion of a workshop conducted by
NMFS on interaction mitigation techniques for sea turtles, seabirds and
other protected species.
* * * * *
(c) An owner of a vessel registered for use under any longline
permit issued under Sec. 660.21 must have a valid protected species
workshop certificate issued by NMFS to the owner of the vessel, in
order to maintain or renew their vessel registration.
(d) An owner and an operator of a vessel registered for use under
any longline permit issued under Sec. 660.21 must have on board the
vessel a valid protected species workshop certificate issued by NMFS to
the operator of the vessel, or a legible copy thereof.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-16117 Filed 8-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S