Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Piankatank River, Gloucester County, VA, 47160-47161 [05-16018]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
47160
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 155 / Friday, August 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(B) Utilization test. In 2007, the plan
sponsor of Plan G, after reviewing
participants’ benefit elections, determines
that no participant in the 2 prior plan years
(2005 and 2006) elected a 5-year term certain
and life annuity with a social security
leveling option. During the 2 prior plan
years, Plan G has made the 5-year term
certain and life annuity with a social security
leveling option available to 142 participants
who were at least age 55 and who elected an
optional form of benefit with an annuity
commencement date during that 2-year
period. In addition, during 2005–06 plan
years, 20 of the 142 participants elected a
single-sum distribution and there was no
retirement-type subsidy available for a
limited period of time. Plan G, in accordance
with paragraph (f)(1) of this section, is
amended on September 1, 2007, effective as
of January 1, 2008, to eliminate all 5-year
term certain and life annuities with a social
security leveling option for all annuity
commencement dates on or after January 1,
2008.
(ii) Conclusion. The amendment satisfies
the requirements of paragraph (f) of this
section. First, the 5-year term certain and life
annuity with a social security leveling option
is not a core option as defined in paragraph
(g)(5) of this section. Second, the plan
amendment is not applicable with respect to
an optional form of benefit with an annuity
commencement date that is earlier than the
number of days in the maximum QJSA
explanation period after the date the
amendment is adopted. Third, the 5-year
term certain and life annuity with a social
security leveling option has been available to
at least 100 participants who are taken into
account for purposes of paragraph (f)(4) of
this section during the look-back period of
2005 and 2006. Fourth, during that period,
no participant elected any optional form that
is part of the generalized optional form being
eliminated (i.e., the 5-year term and life
annuity with a social security leveling
option).
*
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
(3) Effective date for rules relating to
section 411(a) nonforfeitability
provisions. The rules provided in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section are
effective June 7, 2004.
(4) Effective date for rules relating to
utilization test. The rules provided in
paragraph (f) of this section are effective
for amendments adopted after December
31, 2006.
*
*
*
*
*
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 05–15960 Filed 8–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:47 Aug 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 05–15959 Filed 8–11–05; 8:45 am]
26 CFR Parts 41, 48 and 145
[REG–103829–99]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
RIN 1545–AX10
Excise Taxes; Definition of Highway
Vehicle
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Withdrawal of notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document withdraws a
proposed regulation relating to the
definition of a highway vehicle for
purposes of various excise taxes. The
withdrawal affects vehicle
manufacturers, dealers, and lessors; tire
manufacturers; sellers and buyers of
certain motor fuels; and operators of
heavy highway vehicles.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Franklin, (202) 662–3130 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On June 6, 2002, a notice of proposed
rulemaking was published in the
Federal Register (67 FR 38913). A
public hearing was held on February 27,
2003. This notice of proposed
rulemaking proposed amending the
definition of ‘‘highway vehicle’’ for
purposes of the Highway Use Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 41), the
Manufacturers and Retailers Excise Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 48), and the
Temporary Excise Tax Regulations
Under the Highway Revenue Act of
1982 (Pub. L. 97–424) (26 CFR part 145).
Sections 851 and 852 of the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108–
357) addressed the issues raised in the
proposed regulation. Thus, the proposed
regulation is unnecessary.
List of Subjects
26 CFR Part 41
Excise taxes, Motor Vehicles,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
26 CFR Parts 48 and 145
Excise taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
Accordingly, under the authority of
26 U.S.C. 7805, the notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG–103829–99) that was
published in the Federal Register on
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
June 6, 2002 (67 FR 38913), is
withdrawn.
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–05–020]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Piankatank River, Gloucester
County, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
withdrawal.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
withdrawing its notice of proposed
rulemaking concerning the ‘‘2005
Piankatank River Race’’. Pursuant to 33
CFR 100.25, the marine event permit
application for a powerboat race to be
held on the Piankatank River in Virginia
on July 23, 2005 was disapproved.
DATES: The notice of proposed
rulemaking is withdrawn on August 12,
2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Sens, Project Manager, Auxiliary
and Recreational Boating Safety Branch,
at (757) 398–6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 29, 2005, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking entitled
‘‘Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Piankatank River, Gloucester
County, VA’’ in the Federal Register (70
FR 15788). The rulemaking concerned a
proposal to establish special local
regulations during the ‘‘2005 Piankatank
River Race’’, a marine event to be held
over the waters of the Piankatank River
in Gloucester County, Virginia. Special
local regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event.
Withdrawal
We have decided to withdraw this
project after safety and environmental
review. All comments and documents
received in this docket will be available
for use in future rulemakings.
This action is taken under the
authority of 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 155 / Friday, August 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
Dated: August 2, 2005.
S. Ratti,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth
Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. 05–16018 Filed 8–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–U
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
36 CFR Part 1260
RIN 3095–AB38
Declassification of National Security
Information
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
update NARA regulations related to
declassification of classified national
security information in records
transferred to NARA’s legal custody.
The proposal incorporates changes
resulting from amendments to Executive
Order 12958, Classified National
Security Information. These changes
include establishing procedures for the
automatic declassification of records in
NARA’s legal custody and revising
requirements for reclassification of
information to meet the provisions of
E.O. 12958 as amended. The proposed
rule will affect members of the public
and Federal agencies.
DATES: Comments are due by October
11, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 3095–AB38, by any of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: comments@nara.gov. Include
RIN 3095–AB38 in the subject line of
the message.
Fax: (301) 837–0319.
Mail: Regulation Comments Desk
(NPOL), Room 4100, National Archives
and Records Administration, 8601
Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740–
6001.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Regulation
Comments Desk (NPOL), Room 4100,
National Archives and Records
Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road,
College Park, MD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Davis Heaps at 301–837–1801.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Following
is a discussion of substantive changes
contained in this proposed rule.
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:47 Aug 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
Additional nonsubstantive changes have
been made and the proposed regulation
has been written in plain language
where possible in accordance with the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, Plain Language in Government
Writing.
What Changes Have Been Made in This
Proposed Rule?
We propose to amend the existing
regulation to reflect changes resulting
from amendments to the 1995 Executive
Order 12958. Executive Order 13142 of
November 19, 1999, and Executive
Order 13292 of March 28, 2003,
provided for additional amendments to
E.O. 12958. In particular, we are adding
a section that discusses how NARA will
implement automatic declassification
(see § 1260.46). We also propose to
revise Subpart E on reclassification.
NARA’s proposed section on
automatic declassification includes:
• The use of an integral file block to
determine the automatic declassification
date for a group of records;
• Allowing a five year delay in
automatic declassification for special
media records; and
• Allowing a three year delay in
automatic declassification for records
that have been referred to another
agency for review.
In addition, this proposed section
clarifies the kind of information that is
subject to automatic declassification,
including information from the creating
agency or information from another
agency that has been properly referred.
NARA proposes revising the section
on reclassification to include a
procedure by which an agency head
may request the reclassification of
records that have previously been
properly declassified and released. We
also clarify steps an agency may take to
restrict information that was released to
the public but was not properly
declassified (‘‘inadvertent release.’’)
This proposed rule is a significant
regulatory action for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and has been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget. As required by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, I certify that
this proposed rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it
affects Federal agencies and individual
researchers. This proposed rule does not
have any federalism implications.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1260
Archives and records, Classified
information.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, NARA proposes to amend
chapter XII of title 36, Code of Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47161
Regulations, by revising part 1260 to
read as follows:
PART 1260—DECLASSIFICATION OF
NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION
Subpart A—General Information
Sec.
1260.1 What is the purpose of this part?
1260.2 Definitions.
1260.4 What NARA holdings are covered by
this part?
1260.6 What is the authority for this part?
Subpart B—Responsibilities
1260.20 Who is responsible for the
declassification of classified national
security Executive Branch information
that has been accessioned by NARA?
1260.22 Who is responsible for the
declassification of classified national
security White House originated
information in NARA’s holdings?
1260.24 Who is responsible for
declassification of foreign government
information in NARA’s holdings?
1260.26 Who is responsible for issuing
special procedures for declassification of
information pertaining to intelligence
activities and intelligence sources or
methods, or of classified cryptologic
information in NARA’s holdings?
1260.28 Who is responsible for
declassifying records that contain
information classified under the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
commonly referred to as Restricted Data
and Formerly Restricted Data?
Subpart C—Systematic Review
1260.40 How are records at NARA reviewed
for declassification?
1260.42 What are the procedures for agency
personnel to review records at a NARA
facility?
1260.44 Will NARA loan accessioned
records back to the agencies to conduct
declassification review?
1260.46 How will NARA implement
automatic declassification?
Subpart D—Mandatory Review
Executive Branch Records
1260.50 What procedures does NARA
follow when it receives a request for
Executive Branch records under
mandatory review?
1260.52 What are agency responsibilities
after receiving a mandatory review
request forwarded by NARA?
1260.54 What is the appeal process when a
mandatory review request for Executive
Branch information is denied?
1260.55 What is the appeal process when a
mandatory review request for Executive
Branch information is denied within
Nixon Presidential Historical materials
or Presidential records?
White House Originated Information
1260.56 Is White House originated
information subject to mandatory
review?
1260.58 What are the procedures for
requesting a mandatory review of White
House originated information?
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 155 (Friday, August 12, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47160-47161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16018]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05-05-020]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Piankatank River,
Gloucester County, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is withdrawing its notice of proposed
rulemaking concerning the ``2005 Piankatank River Race''. Pursuant to
33 CFR 100.25, the marine event permit application for a powerboat race
to be held on the Piankatank River in Virginia on July 23, 2005 was
disapproved.
DATES: The notice of proposed rulemaking is withdrawn on August 12,
2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Sens, Project Manager,
Auxiliary and Recreational Boating Safety Branch, at (757) 398-6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 29, 2005, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
entitled ``Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Piankatank
River, Gloucester County, VA'' in the Federal Register (70 FR 15788).
The rulemaking concerned a proposal to establish special local
regulations during the ``2005 Piankatank River Race'', a marine event
to be held over the waters of the Piankatank River in Gloucester
County, Virginia. Special local regulations are necessary to provide
for the safety of life on navigable waters during the event.
Withdrawal
We have decided to withdraw this project after safety and
environmental review. All comments and documents received in this
docket will be available for use in future rulemakings.
This action is taken under the authority of 33 U.S.C. 1233;
Department
[[Page 47161]]
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Dated: August 2, 2005.
S. Ratti,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District,
Acting.
[FR Doc. 05-16018 Filed 8-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
