Pipeline Safety: Countermeasures to Prevent Human Fatigue in the Control Room, 46917-46919 [05-15956]
Download as PDF
46917
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 154 / Thursday, August 11, 2005 / Notices
MODIFICATION TO EXEMPTIONS—Continued
Reason for
delay
Application
No.
Applicant
13580–M ......
12384–M ......
13327–M ......
7774–M ........
13488–M ......
12988–M ......
12284–M ......
11579–M ......
11241–M ......
7280–M ........
10878–M ......
8162–M ........
8718–M ........
Carleton Technologies Inc., Orchard Park, NY ....................................................................................
OilAir Hydraulics, Inc., Houston, TX .....................................................................................................
Hawk FRP LLC, Ardmore, OK ..............................................................................................................
Pipe Recovery Systems, Inc., Houston, TX ..........................................................................................
Faber Industries Spa, (U.S. Agent: Kaplan Industries, Maple Shade, NJ) ..........................................
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, PA ....................................................................................
The American Traffic Safety Services, Assn. (ATSSA), Fredericksburg, VA .......................................
Dyno Nobel, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT ....................................................................................................
Rohm and Haas Co., Philadelphia, PA .................................................................................................
Department of Defense, Ft. Eustis, VA .................................................................................................
Tankcon FRP Inc., Boisbriand, Qc .......................................................................................................
Structural Composites Industries, Pomona, CA ...................................................................................
Structural Composites Industries, Pomona, CA ...................................................................................
4
4
1
4
4
4
1
4
1
4
1, 3
4
4
Estimated date
of completion
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
09–30–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
RENEWAL OF EXEMPTIONS
Reason for
delay
Application No.
Applicant
9649–X ...................
U.S. Department of Defense, Fort Eustis, VA ........................................................................
[FR Doc. 05–15860 Filed 8–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Pipeline Safety: Countermeasures to
Prevent Human Fatigue in the Control
Room
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Issuance of Advisory
Bulletin.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA) issues this advisory bulletin
to owners and operators of natural gas
and hazardous liquid pipelines and
liquefied natural gas facilities. The
purpose of this advisory is to help
operators ensure that controllers are not
assigned to shift duties while fatigued,
to advise pipeline operators on
considerations which could cause a
reduction of mental alertness or
decision making ability, and to
encourage safe management practices.
This advisory also responds to the
National Transportation Safety Board’s
(NTSB) Safety Recommendation P–98–
30, which urges PHMSA to establish
industry guidelines for pipeline
controller work schedules to reduce the
likelihood of accidents attributable to
controller fatigue.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Florence Hamn by telephone at (202)
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:14 Aug 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
366–3015; by fax at (202) 366–4566, or
by e-mail at Florence.Hamn@dot.gov.
General information about the PHMSA’s
Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) programs
may be obtained by accessing the Web
site home page at https://ops.dot.gov.
I. Background
NTSB Recommendations
On November 18, 1998, the NTSB
issued Safety Recommendation P–98–
30, which urges PHMSA, formerly
RSPA, to ‘‘assess the potential safety
risks associated with rotating pipeline
controller shifts and establish industry
guidelines for the development and
implementation of pipeline controller
work schedules that reduce the
likelihood of accidents attributable to
controller fatigue.’’ This
recommendation resulted from NTSB’s
investigation into the rupture of a
hazardous liquid pipeline that released
about 957,600 gallons of fuel oil into a
river and surrounding areas.
NTSB determined that the probable
cause of the rupture was, in part, the
failure to ensure that pipeline
controllers were properly trained to
recognize and respond to operational
emergencies, abnormal conditions, and
pipeline leaks. NTSB noted that the
controller responsible for operation of
the failed pipeline had worked under a
rotating shift schedule that may have
contributed to operator fatigue. NTSB
expressed concern about the potential
for pipeline controller fatigue from
rotating shift schedules.
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Estimated date
of completion
1, 3
08–31–2005
In 1999, NTSB issued Safety
Recommendation P–99–12, which urges
PHMSA to establish within two years
scientifically based hours of service
regulations that set limits on hours of
service, provide predictable work and
rest schedules, and consider circadian
rhythms and human sleep and rest
requirements.
This recommendation resulted from
the NTSB’s review of all transportation
accidents reported to U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT) modal
administrations over a 10 year period.
NTSB noted that it had issued over 70
fatigue-related safety recommendations
that resulted from its investigations of
major accidents, special investigations,
or safety studies that identified operator
fatigue as a causal factor. The NTSB
noted that scientific research has shown
that certain sleep factors can affect
fatigue and performance, such as
insufficient sleep, irregular schedules,
and unpredictable schedules.
PHMSA Actions and Guidance
In response to these
recommendations, PHMSA has been
aggressively working with the pipeline
community and federal agencies to
evaluate how rotating controller
schedules in the pipeline industry may
be related to human fatigue and safety
outcomes. From this work, PHMSA has
developed the following guidance,
which can be applied in the pipeline
environment:
Work Schedules/Hours of Service
Fatigue is a critical safety concern for
shift workers, especially workers in the
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
46918
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 154 / Thursday, August 11, 2005 / Notices
transportation industry. Many pipeline
control operators work 10 and 12 hour
shifts, and they generally perform
sedentary tasks requiring high levels of
vigilance. Consequently, fatigue may be
an issue, given the long hours of
continuous control monitoring and the
reduced likelihood of taking rest breaks.
Fatigue can result in sleepiness,
drowsiness, reduced alertness, and/or
slower reaction time. This in turn can
make handling stressful or emergency
situations on the job more difficult.
Being fatigued can make it difficult to
concentrate, thereby increasing the
possibility of safety-related control
errors.
An individual’s body processes have
peaks and valleys during every 24-hour
period. Time cues, like work rest
schedules, help set the sleep pattern.
Crossing time zones or changing from a
day shift to a night shift forces the sleep
pattern to move to a different schedule.
Time is required to adjust to the new
schedule.
Although individuals differ in their
optimal sleep requirements, adults
typically need between 6 and 10 hours
of sleep in a 24-hour period. Most
people, however, require approximately
8 hours of sleep per day. When adults
get less than 5 hours of sleep over a 24hour period, peak mental abilities begin
to decline. Additionally, sleep
deprivation of just a couple of days can
slow response times and decrease
initiative. Sleep deficit leads to less
alertness and slower response times.
Although working non-traditional
shifts is a common and necessary part
of the pipeline control operator’s job,
the countermeasures recommended in
this advisory can help reduce the
potential detrimental effects of shift
work on worker safety.
Control Room Environment
Pipeline control operators generally
remain seated for long periods of time,
and the environment of the control
room can affect an individual’s sleep
patterns. The sedentary work of control
operators can add to shift-work fatigue
and reduce an operator’s alertness
because it decreases blood flow and
causes sleepiness. An individual’s sleep
pattern is affected by the presence of
light and darkness. By incorporating
specific design features, such as lighting
and temperature control, operator
alertness can be maximized at any time
of the day or night, which in turn
enhances safety by reducing fatigue and
control errors.
Training and Education
Because adequate sleep is the main
way to address fatigue, controller
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:14 Aug 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
education programs must emphasize the
recognition of the signs of sleep
deprivation. Operators can improve
safety by analyzing working conditions,
addressing operational safety issues,
and conducting sleep-safety training.
For example, teaching control
supervisors that work rotation schedules
that go in the direction of the sun have
been found to reduce the negative
effects of fatigue. Furthermore, training
controllers on the number of hours of
sleep needed to reduce fatigue and
methods they can use to fall asleep,
such as dark light shades, can provide
controllers with the tools they need to
control fatigue.
Operator Fatigue Studies
Several studies are electronically
available that provide more information
about operator fatigue, such as the U.S.
Department of Transportation’s
Commercial Transportation Commercial
Transportation Operator Fatigue
Management Reference (2003). This
document can be viewed at https://
ops.dot.gov/regs/reports/
Fatigue%20Management%20
Reference.pdf. This publication also
references many other studies and
reports on human fatigue.
PHMSA urges operators to evaluate
potential risks associated with pipeline
operator fatigue and shift rotation
schedules and take measures to alleviate
such risks.
II. Advisory Bulletin (ADB–05–06)
To: Owners and operators of natural
gas and hazardous liquid pipeline and
liquefied natural gas facilities.
Subject: Countermeasures to Prevent
Human Fatigue in the Pipeline Control
Room.
Purpose: The purpose of this advisory
is to address situations where fatigue
could reduce the ability of pipeline
operators and their controller staff to
operate pipelines in a safe condition.
This advisory is designed to help
operators ensure that controllers are not
assigned to shift duties while fatigued,
to advise pipeline operators on
considerations which could cause a
reduction of mental alertness or
decision making ability, and to
encourage management practices which
will promote safety. This advisory
provides guidance to gas and liquids
pipeline operators and their pipeline
controllers.
Advisory: The functions of a
controller are often sedentary tasks
requiring high levels of vigilance.
Consequently, fatigue may be an issue,
given long hours of continuous control
monitoring and the reduced likelihood
of taking rest breaks. Fatigue can result
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in sleepiness, drowsiness, and/or
reduced alertness. These factors can
decrease the ability of the pipeline
controller to safely perform critical
functions. It is known that fatigue is
significantly underestimated as a
contributing factor in conventional
accident reporting in many
transportation modes because it is
difficult to accurately detect. The
scientific knowledge on human
alertness has improved in recent years,
but has not been broadly applied to
managing operator fatigue because it is
difficult to determine how much fatigue
has contributed to the cause and/or the
magnitude of pipeline accidents.
PHMSA, however, has learned that
there are measures that can be taken to
reduce the detrimental effects of shift
work on worker safety, and provides the
following guidance for operators to
consider:
Work Scheduling and Hours of Service
An individual’s body processes have
natural peaks and valleys during every
24-hour period. Adults typically need
between 6 and 10 hours of sleep in each
24-hour period, and suffer from
declining peak mental abilities if they
get less than 5 hours of sleep. Natural
sleep schedules are affected by shifts in
routine, and can be affected by nonroutine work schedules. This can lead to
fatigue or impair alertness if operators
are working non-standard shifts or are
working long hours without enough
rest. PHMSA advises pipeline operators
to consider:
• Developing shift rotation practices
to minimize fatigue caused by the
disruption of normal sleep patterns.
• Limiting work schedules to no more
than 12 hours in any 24 hour period
except in extraordinary or emergency
situations.
• Developing a policy or procedure to
manage unusual circumstances where a
controller is required to work more than
12 hours in any 24 hour period.
• Scheduling at least a 10 hour break
between work periods.
• Scheduling overtime on an
individual basis, not the whole shift of
controllers and controller supervisors.
Controller fatigue and alertness should
be considered in allowing overtime.
• Developing guidelines for
scheduling controllers and supervisors
in emergency situations taking into
consideration controller fatigue and
alertness.
• Establishing work relief periods and
other measures during controller shifts
to promote alertness and enhance
capabilities for effective decision
making.
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 154 / Thursday, August 11, 2005 / Notices
Control Room Environmental Factors
An individual’s sleep pattern is also
influenced by external factors. Many
control rooms are designed for day
workers. In 24-hour pipeline operations,
alertness and vigilance on the night shift
is equally as important and should be
addressed by the operator. Although
there are many methods that can be
employed to reduce operator fatigue in
the control room, PHMSA advises
pipeline operators to consider:
• Using the available information on
control room environments to
incorporate environmental measures
that reduce fatigue and promote
alertness.
• Adjusting environmental factors to
specifically address the problems
associated with night shifts and shift
rotation schedules.
• Sharing information across the
industry on environmental factors in
control rooms that can affect fatigue and
controller alertness.
Training and Education
Training and education of both
supervisors and controller personnel is
critical to the prevention of fatiguerelated pipeline incidents. These efforts
can maximize the safety and
performance of pipeline control
personnel by minimizing the effects of
fatigue in shift-work operations.
Therefore, PHMSA advises pipeline
operators to consider:
• Educating controllers and controller
supervisors on factors that impact
human fatigue.
• Training supervisors of controllers
to recognize signs of stress and fatigue
both on duty and when reporting for
duty.
• Sharing information across the
industry on training of controllers and
supervisors on the effects of fatigue on
controller alertness and decision
making.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 5,
2005.
Theodore L. Willke,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline
Safety.
[FR Doc. 05–15956 Filed 8–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Research and Innovative Technology
Administration
Agency Information Collection;
Activity Under OMB Review;
Submission of Audit Reports—Part 248
Research & Innovative
Technology Administration (RITA),
AGENCY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:14 Aug 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
Bureau of Transportation Statistics
(BTS), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) described
below is being forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
extension of currently approved
collections. The ICR describes the
nature of the information collection and
its expected burden. The Federal
Register notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the
following collection of information was
published on December 17, 2004 (69 FR
75602).
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted by September 12, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bernie Stankus, Office of Airline
Information, RTS–42, Room 4125, RITA,
BTS, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001,
Telephone Number (202) 366–4387, Fax
Number (202) 366–3383 or e-mail
bernard.stankus@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Bureau of Transportation Statistics
(BTS)
Title: Submission of Audit Reports—
Part 248.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved reporting
requirement.
OMB Control Number: 2138–0004.
Affected Public: Certificated air
carriers.
Number of Respondents: 85.
Number of Responses: 85.
Total Annual Burden: 21 hours.
Abstract: BTS collects independent
audited financial reports from U.S.
certificated air carriers. Carriers not
having an annual audit must file a
statement that no such audit has been
performed. In lieu of the audit report,
BTS will accept the annual report
submitted to the stockholders. The
audited reports are needed by the
Department of Transportation as: (1) A
means to monitor an air carrier’s
continuing fitness to operate, (2)
reference material used by analysts in
examining foreign route cases, (3)
reference material used by analysts in
examining proposed mergers,
acquisitions and consolidations, (4) a
means whereby BTS sends a copy of the
report to the International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) in fulfillment of a
United States treaty obligation, and (5)
corroboration of a carrier’s Form 41
filings.
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46919
The Confidential Information
Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act
of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note), requires
a statistical agency to clearly identify
information it collects for non-statistical
purposes. BTS hereby notifies the
respondents and the public that BTS
uses the information it collects under
this OMB approval for non-statistical
purposes including, but not limited to,
publication of both Respondent’s
identity and its data, submission of the
information to agencies outside BTS for
review, analysis and possible use in
regulatory and other administrative
matters.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, 725–17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503, Attention: BTS
Desk Officer.
Comments are invited on: whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Department of
Transportation. Comments should
address whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 5,
2005.
Donald W. Bright,
Assistant Director, Office of Airline
Information.
[FR Doc. 05–15914 Filed 8–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–FE–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Research & Innovative Technology
Administration
Agency Information Collection;
Activity Under OMB Review; Reporting
Required for International Civil
Aviation Organization (ICAO)
Research & Innovative
Technology Administration (RITA),
Bureau of Transportation Statistics
(BTS), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) described
below is being forwarded to the Office
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 154 (Thursday, August 11, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46917-46919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-15956]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Pipeline Safety: Countermeasures to Prevent Human Fatigue in the
Control Room
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Issuance of Advisory Bulletin.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA) issues this advisory bulletin to owners and operators of
natural gas and hazardous liquid pipelines and liquefied natural gas
facilities. The purpose of this advisory is to help operators ensure
that controllers are not assigned to shift duties while fatigued, to
advise pipeline operators on considerations which could cause a
reduction of mental alertness or decision making ability, and to
encourage safe management practices.
This advisory also responds to the National Transportation Safety
Board's (NTSB) Safety Recommendation P-98-30, which urges PHMSA to
establish industry guidelines for pipeline controller work schedules to
reduce the likelihood of accidents attributable to controller fatigue.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Florence Hamn by telephone at (202)
366-3015; by fax at (202) 366-4566, or by e-mail at
Florence.Hamn@dot.gov. General information about the PHMSA's Office of
Pipeline Safety (OPS) programs may be obtained by accessing the Web
site home page at https://ops.dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
NTSB Recommendations
On November 18, 1998, the NTSB issued Safety Recommendation P-98-
30, which urges PHMSA, formerly RSPA, to ``assess the potential safety
risks associated with rotating pipeline controller shifts and establish
industry guidelines for the development and implementation of pipeline
controller work schedules that reduce the likelihood of accidents
attributable to controller fatigue.'' This recommendation resulted from
NTSB's investigation into the rupture of a hazardous liquid pipeline
that released about 957,600 gallons of fuel oil into a river and
surrounding areas.
NTSB determined that the probable cause of the rupture was, in
part, the failure to ensure that pipeline controllers were properly
trained to recognize and respond to operational emergencies, abnormal
conditions, and pipeline leaks. NTSB noted that the controller
responsible for operation of the failed pipeline had worked under a
rotating shift schedule that may have contributed to operator fatigue.
NTSB expressed concern about the potential for pipeline controller
fatigue from rotating shift schedules.
In 1999, NTSB issued Safety Recommendation P-99-12, which urges
PHMSA to establish within two years scientifically based hours of
service regulations that set limits on hours of service, provide
predictable work and rest schedules, and consider circadian rhythms and
human sleep and rest requirements.
This recommendation resulted from the NTSB's review of all
transportation accidents reported to U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT) modal administrations over a 10 year period. NTSB noted that it
had issued over 70 fatigue-related safety recommendations that resulted
from its investigations of major accidents, special investigations, or
safety studies that identified operator fatigue as a causal factor. The
NTSB noted that scientific research has shown that certain sleep
factors can affect fatigue and performance, such as insufficient sleep,
irregular schedules, and unpredictable schedules.
PHMSA Actions and Guidance
In response to these recommendations, PHMSA has been aggressively
working with the pipeline community and federal agencies to evaluate
how rotating controller schedules in the pipeline industry may be
related to human fatigue and safety outcomes. From this work, PHMSA has
developed the following guidance, which can be applied in the pipeline
environment:
Work Schedules/Hours of Service
Fatigue is a critical safety concern for shift workers, especially
workers in the
[[Page 46918]]
transportation industry. Many pipeline control operators work 10 and 12
hour shifts, and they generally perform sedentary tasks requiring high
levels of vigilance. Consequently, fatigue may be an issue, given the
long hours of continuous control monitoring and the reduced likelihood
of taking rest breaks. Fatigue can result in sleepiness, drowsiness,
reduced alertness, and/or slower reaction time. This in turn can make
handling stressful or emergency situations on the job more difficult.
Being fatigued can make it difficult to concentrate, thereby increasing
the possibility of safety-related control errors.
An individual's body processes have peaks and valleys during every
24-hour period. Time cues, like work rest schedules, help set the sleep
pattern. Crossing time zones or changing from a day shift to a night
shift forces the sleep pattern to move to a different schedule. Time is
required to adjust to the new schedule.
Although individuals differ in their optimal sleep requirements,
adults typically need between 6 and 10 hours of sleep in a 24-hour
period. Most people, however, require approximately 8 hours of sleep
per day. When adults get less than 5 hours of sleep over a 24-hour
period, peak mental abilities begin to decline. Additionally, sleep
deprivation of just a couple of days can slow response times and
decrease initiative. Sleep deficit leads to less alertness and slower
response times.
Although working non-traditional shifts is a common and necessary
part of the pipeline control operator's job, the countermeasures
recommended in this advisory can help reduce the potential detrimental
effects of shift work on worker safety.
Control Room Environment
Pipeline control operators generally remain seated for long periods
of time, and the environment of the control room can affect an
individual's sleep patterns. The sedentary work of control operators
can add to shift-work fatigue and reduce an operator's alertness
because it decreases blood flow and causes sleepiness. An individual's
sleep pattern is affected by the presence of light and darkness. By
incorporating specific design features, such as lighting and
temperature control, operator alertness can be maximized at any time of
the day or night, which in turn enhances safety by reducing fatigue and
control errors.
Training and Education
Because adequate sleep is the main way to address fatigue,
controller education programs must emphasize the recognition of the
signs of sleep deprivation. Operators can improve safety by analyzing
working conditions, addressing operational safety issues, and
conducting sleep-safety training. For example, teaching control
supervisors that work rotation schedules that go in the direction of
the sun have been found to reduce the negative effects of fatigue.
Furthermore, training controllers on the number of hours of sleep
needed to reduce fatigue and methods they can use to fall asleep, such
as dark light shades, can provide controllers with the tools they need
to control fatigue.
Operator Fatigue Studies
Several studies are electronically available that provide more
information about operator fatigue, such as the U.S. Department of
Transportation's Commercial Transportation Commercial Transportation
Operator Fatigue Management Reference (2003). This document can be
viewed at https://ops.dot.gov/regs/reports/Fatigue%20Management%20
Reference.pdf. This publication also references many other studies and
reports on human fatigue.
PHMSA urges operators to evaluate potential risks associated with
pipeline operator fatigue and shift rotation schedules and take
measures to alleviate such risks.
II. Advisory Bulletin (ADB-05-06)
To: Owners and operators of natural gas and hazardous liquid
pipeline and liquefied natural gas facilities.
Subject: Countermeasures to Prevent Human Fatigue in the Pipeline
Control Room.
Purpose: The purpose of this advisory is to address situations
where fatigue could reduce the ability of pipeline operators and their
controller staff to operate pipelines in a safe condition. This
advisory is designed to help operators ensure that controllers are not
assigned to shift duties while fatigued, to advise pipeline operators
on considerations which could cause a reduction of mental alertness or
decision making ability, and to encourage management practices which
will promote safety. This advisory provides guidance to gas and liquids
pipeline operators and their pipeline controllers.
Advisory: The functions of a controller are often sedentary tasks
requiring high levels of vigilance. Consequently, fatigue may be an
issue, given long hours of continuous control monitoring and the
reduced likelihood of taking rest breaks. Fatigue can result in
sleepiness, drowsiness, and/or reduced alertness. These factors can
decrease the ability of the pipeline controller to safely perform
critical functions. It is known that fatigue is significantly
underestimated as a contributing factor in conventional accident
reporting in many transportation modes because it is difficult to
accurately detect. The scientific knowledge on human alertness has
improved in recent years, but has not been broadly applied to managing
operator fatigue because it is difficult to determine how much fatigue
has contributed to the cause and/or the magnitude of pipeline
accidents. PHMSA, however, has learned that there are measures that can
be taken to reduce the detrimental effects of shift work on worker
safety, and provides the following guidance for operators to consider:
Work Scheduling and Hours of Service
An individual's body processes have natural peaks and valleys
during every 24-hour period. Adults typically need between 6 and 10
hours of sleep in each 24-hour period, and suffer from declining peak
mental abilities if they get less than 5 hours of sleep. Natural sleep
schedules are affected by shifts in routine, and can be affected by
non-routine work schedules. This can lead to fatigue or impair
alertness if operators are working non-standard shifts or are working
long hours without enough rest. PHMSA advises pipeline operators to
consider:
Developing shift rotation practices to minimize fatigue
caused by the disruption of normal sleep patterns.
Limiting work schedules to no more than 12 hours in any 24
hour period except in extraordinary or emergency situations.
Developing a policy or procedure to manage unusual
circumstances where a controller is required to work more than 12 hours
in any 24 hour period.
Scheduling at least a 10 hour break between work periods.
Scheduling overtime on an individual basis, not the whole
shift of controllers and controller supervisors. Controller fatigue and
alertness should be considered in allowing overtime.
Developing guidelines for scheduling controllers and
supervisors in emergency situations taking into consideration
controller fatigue and alertness.
Establishing work relief periods and other measures during
controller shifts to promote alertness and enhance capabilities for
effective decision making.
[[Page 46919]]
Control Room Environmental Factors
An individual's sleep pattern is also influenced by external
factors. Many control rooms are designed for day workers. In 24-hour
pipeline operations, alertness and vigilance on the night shift is
equally as important and should be addressed by the operator. Although
there are many methods that can be employed to reduce operator fatigue
in the control room, PHMSA advises pipeline operators to consider:
Using the available information on control room
environments to incorporate environmental measures that reduce fatigue
and promote alertness.
Adjusting environmental factors to specifically address
the problems associated with night shifts and shift rotation schedules.
Sharing information across the industry on environmental
factors in control rooms that can affect fatigue and controller
alertness.
Training and Education
Training and education of both supervisors and controller personnel
is critical to the prevention of fatigue-related pipeline incidents.
These efforts can maximize the safety and performance of pipeline
control personnel by minimizing the effects of fatigue in shift-work
operations. Therefore, PHMSA advises pipeline operators to consider:
Educating controllers and controller supervisors on
factors that impact human fatigue.
Training supervisors of controllers to recognize signs of
stress and fatigue both on duty and when reporting for duty.
Sharing information across the industry on training of
controllers and supervisors on the effects of fatigue on controller
alertness and decision making.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 5, 2005.
Theodore L. Willke,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 05-15956 Filed 8-10-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P