Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Notice of Delays in Processing of Exemption Applications, 46916-46917 [05-15860]
Download as PDF
46916
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 154 / Thursday, August 11, 2005 / Notices
injuries, and amount of property
damage.
As used in this notice, ‘‘information
collection’’ includes all work related to
preparing and disseminating
information related to this
recordkeeping requirement including
completing paperwork, gathering
information and conducting telephone
calls.
Type of Information Collection
Request: Renewal of Existing Collection.
Title of Information Collection:
Pipeline Safety Reports of Abandoned
Underwater Pipelines
Respondents: Gas and hazardous
liquid pipeline operators.
Estimated Number of Respondents
per Year: 10.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 60 hours.
Issued in Washington DC on August 5,
2005.
Florence L. Hamn,
Director, Office of Regulations.
[FR Doc. 05–15955 Filed 8–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SW., Washington, DC 20590–0001, (202)
366–4535.
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Key to ‘‘Reason for Delay’’
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety;
Notice of Delays in Processing of
Exemption Applications
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, DOT.
AGENCY:
List of application delayed more
than 180 days.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(C),
PHMSA is publishing the following list
of exemption applications that have
been in process for 180 days or more.
The reason(s) for delay and the expected
completion date for action on each
application is provided in association
with each identified application.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Delmer Billings, Office of Hazardous
Materials Exemptions and Approvals,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
1. Awaiting additional information
from applicant.
2. Extensive public comment under
review.
3. Application is technically complex
and is of significant impact or
precedent-setting and requires extensive
analysis.
4. Staff review delayed by other
priority issues or volume of exemption
applications.
Meaning of Application Number
Suffixes
N—New application.
M—Modification request.
X—Renewal.
PM—Party to application with
modification request.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 5,
2005.
R. Ryan Posten,
Exemptions Program Officer, Office of
Hazardous Materials Safety Exemptions &
Approvals.
NEW EXEMPTION APPLICATIONS
Application
No.
13183–N
13281–N
13266–N
13302–N
13341–N
13314–N
13309–N
13347–N
13346–N
14149–N
14140–N
14141–N
14146–N
14138–N
14038–N
14010–N
13999–N
13957–N
14154–N
14151–N
13582–N
13563–N
13547–N
Reason for
delay
Applicant
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
Becton Dickinson, Sandy, UT ...............................................................................................................
The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI ..........................................................................................
Luxfer Gas Cylinder, Riverside, CA ......................................................................................................
FIBA Technologies, Inc., Westboro, MA ...............................................................................................
National Propane Gas Association, Washington, DC ...........................................................................
Sunoco Inc., Philadelphia, PA ...............................................................................................................
OPW Engineered Systems, Lebanon, OH ............................................................................................
ShipMate, Inc., Torrance, CA ................................................................................................................
Stand-By-Systems, Inc., Dallas, TX ......................................................................................................
Digital Wave Corporation, Englewood, CO ...........................................................................................
Albermarle Corporation, Baton Rouge, LA ...........................................................................................
Nalco Company, Naperville, IL .............................................................................................................
Brunswick Corporation, Lake Forest, IL ................................................................................................
INO Therapeutics, Inc., Port Allen, LA ..................................................................................................
Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI ..................................................................................................
Varsal, LLC, Warminster, PA ................................................................................................................
Kompozit-Praha s.r.o., Dysina u Plzne, Czech Republic, CZ ..............................................................
T.L.C.C.I, Inc., Franklin, TN ..................................................................................................................
Carleton Technologies, Inc. ..................................................................................................................
Chevron Texaco, Houston, TX ..............................................................................................................
Linde Gas LLC (Linde), Independence, OH .........................................................................................
Applied Companies, Valencia, CA ........................................................................................................
CP Industries, McKeesport, PA ............................................................................................................
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Estimated date
of completion
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
08–31–2005
MODIFICATION TO EXEMPTIONS
Reason for
delay
Application
No.
Applicant
7277–M ........
10019–M ......
10915–M ......
6263–M ........
10319–M ......
11970–M ......
Structural Composites Industries, Pomona,CA .....................................................................................
Structural Composites Industries, Pomona,CA .....................................................................................
Luxfer Gas Cylinders (Composite, Cylinder Division), Riverside, CA ..................................................
Amtrol, Inc., West Warwick, RI .............................................................................................................
Amtrol, Inc., West Warwick, RI .............................................................................................................
ExxonMobile Chemical Company, Mont Belvieu, TX ...........................................................................
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:14 Aug 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
4
4
1
4
4
4
Estimated date
of completion
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
46917
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 154 / Thursday, August 11, 2005 / Notices
MODIFICATION TO EXEMPTIONS—Continued
Reason for
delay
Application
No.
Applicant
13580–M ......
12384–M ......
13327–M ......
7774–M ........
13488–M ......
12988–M ......
12284–M ......
11579–M ......
11241–M ......
7280–M ........
10878–M ......
8162–M ........
8718–M ........
Carleton Technologies Inc., Orchard Park, NY ....................................................................................
OilAir Hydraulics, Inc., Houston, TX .....................................................................................................
Hawk FRP LLC, Ardmore, OK ..............................................................................................................
Pipe Recovery Systems, Inc., Houston, TX ..........................................................................................
Faber Industries Spa, (U.S. Agent: Kaplan Industries, Maple Shade, NJ) ..........................................
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, PA ....................................................................................
The American Traffic Safety Services, Assn. (ATSSA), Fredericksburg, VA .......................................
Dyno Nobel, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT ....................................................................................................
Rohm and Haas Co., Philadelphia, PA .................................................................................................
Department of Defense, Ft. Eustis, VA .................................................................................................
Tankcon FRP Inc., Boisbriand, Qc .......................................................................................................
Structural Composites Industries, Pomona, CA ...................................................................................
Structural Composites Industries, Pomona, CA ...................................................................................
4
4
1
4
4
4
1
4
1
4
1, 3
4
4
Estimated date
of completion
09–30–2005
09–30–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
09–30–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
08–31–2005
RENEWAL OF EXEMPTIONS
Reason for
delay
Application No.
Applicant
9649–X ...................
U.S. Department of Defense, Fort Eustis, VA ........................................................................
[FR Doc. 05–15860 Filed 8–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Pipeline Safety: Countermeasures to
Prevent Human Fatigue in the Control
Room
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Issuance of Advisory
Bulletin.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA) issues this advisory bulletin
to owners and operators of natural gas
and hazardous liquid pipelines and
liquefied natural gas facilities. The
purpose of this advisory is to help
operators ensure that controllers are not
assigned to shift duties while fatigued,
to advise pipeline operators on
considerations which could cause a
reduction of mental alertness or
decision making ability, and to
encourage safe management practices.
This advisory also responds to the
National Transportation Safety Board’s
(NTSB) Safety Recommendation P–98–
30, which urges PHMSA to establish
industry guidelines for pipeline
controller work schedules to reduce the
likelihood of accidents attributable to
controller fatigue.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Florence Hamn by telephone at (202)
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:14 Aug 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
366–3015; by fax at (202) 366–4566, or
by e-mail at Florence.Hamn@dot.gov.
General information about the PHMSA’s
Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) programs
may be obtained by accessing the Web
site home page at https://ops.dot.gov.
I. Background
NTSB Recommendations
On November 18, 1998, the NTSB
issued Safety Recommendation P–98–
30, which urges PHMSA, formerly
RSPA, to ‘‘assess the potential safety
risks associated with rotating pipeline
controller shifts and establish industry
guidelines for the development and
implementation of pipeline controller
work schedules that reduce the
likelihood of accidents attributable to
controller fatigue.’’ This
recommendation resulted from NTSB’s
investigation into the rupture of a
hazardous liquid pipeline that released
about 957,600 gallons of fuel oil into a
river and surrounding areas.
NTSB determined that the probable
cause of the rupture was, in part, the
failure to ensure that pipeline
controllers were properly trained to
recognize and respond to operational
emergencies, abnormal conditions, and
pipeline leaks. NTSB noted that the
controller responsible for operation of
the failed pipeline had worked under a
rotating shift schedule that may have
contributed to operator fatigue. NTSB
expressed concern about the potential
for pipeline controller fatigue from
rotating shift schedules.
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Estimated date
of completion
1, 3
08–31–2005
In 1999, NTSB issued Safety
Recommendation P–99–12, which urges
PHMSA to establish within two years
scientifically based hours of service
regulations that set limits on hours of
service, provide predictable work and
rest schedules, and consider circadian
rhythms and human sleep and rest
requirements.
This recommendation resulted from
the NTSB’s review of all transportation
accidents reported to U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT) modal
administrations over a 10 year period.
NTSB noted that it had issued over 70
fatigue-related safety recommendations
that resulted from its investigations of
major accidents, special investigations,
or safety studies that identified operator
fatigue as a causal factor. The NTSB
noted that scientific research has shown
that certain sleep factors can affect
fatigue and performance, such as
insufficient sleep, irregular schedules,
and unpredictable schedules.
PHMSA Actions and Guidance
In response to these
recommendations, PHMSA has been
aggressively working with the pipeline
community and federal agencies to
evaluate how rotating controller
schedules in the pipeline industry may
be related to human fatigue and safety
outcomes. From this work, PHMSA has
developed the following guidance,
which can be applied in the pipeline
environment:
Work Schedules/Hours of Service
Fatigue is a critical safety concern for
shift workers, especially workers in the
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 154 (Thursday, August 11, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46916-46917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-15860]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Notice of Delays in
Processing of Exemption Applications
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: List of application delayed more than 180 days.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(C),
PHMSA is publishing the following list of exemption applications that
have been in process for 180 days or more. The reason(s) for delay and
the expected completion date for action on each application is provided
in association with each identified application.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delmer Billings, Office of Hazardous
Materials Exemptions and Approvals, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001, (202) 366-4535.
Key to ``Reason for Delay''
1. Awaiting additional information from applicant.
2. Extensive public comment under review.
3. Application is technically complex and is of significant impact
or precedent-setting and requires extensive analysis.
4. Staff review delayed by other priority issues or volume of
exemption applications.
Meaning of Application Number Suffixes
N--New application.
M--Modification request.
X--Renewal.
PM--Party to application with modification request.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 5, 2005.
R. Ryan Posten,
Exemptions Program Officer, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety
Exemptions & Approvals.
New Exemption Applications
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason
Application No. Applicant for Estimated date
delay of completion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
13183-N............. Becton Dickinson, 4 09-30-2005
Sandy, UT.
13281-N............. The Dow Chemical 4 09-30-2005
Company, Midland, MI.
13266-N............. Luxfer Gas Cylinder, 4 09-30-2005
Riverside, CA.
13302-N............. FIBA Technologies, 4 09-30-2005
Inc., Westboro, MA.
13341-N............. National Propane Gas 3 09-30-2005
Association,
Washington, DC.
13314-N............. Sunoco Inc., 4 09-30-2005
Philadelphia, PA.
13309-N............. OPW Engineered Systems, 4 09-30-2005
Lebanon, OH.
13347-N............. ShipMate, Inc., 4 09-30-2005
Torrance, CA.
13346-N............. Stand-By-Systems, Inc., 1 09-30-2005
Dallas, TX.
14149-N............. Digital Wave 4 09-30-2005
Corporation,
Englewood, CO.
14140-N............. Albermarle Corporation, 4 09-30-2005
Baton Rouge, LA.
14141-N............. Nalco Company, 4 09-30-2005
Naperville, IL.
14146-N............. Brunswick Corporation, 4 09-30-2005
Lake Forest, IL.
14138-N............. INO Therapeutics, Inc., 4 09-30-2005
Port Allen, LA.
14038-N............. Dow Chemical Company, 1 09-30-2005
Midland, MI.
14010-N............. Varsal, LLC, 4 09-30-2005
Warminster, PA.
13999-N............. Kompozit-Praha s.r.o., 4 09-30-2005
Dysina u Plzne, Czech
Republic, CZ.
13957-N............. T.L.C.C.I, Inc., 4 09-30-2005
Franklin, TN.
14154-N............. Carleton Technologies, 4 09-30-2005
Inc..
14151-N............. Chevron Texaco, 4 09-30-2005
Houston, TX.
13582-N............. Linde Gas LLC (Linde), 4 09-30-2005
Independence, OH.
13563-N............. Applied Companies, 4 09-30-2005
Valencia, CA.
13547-N............. CP Industries, 4 08-31-2005
McKeesport, PA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification to Exemptions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason
Application No. Applicant for Estimated date
delay of completion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7277-M.............. Structural Composites 4 08-31-2005
Industries, Pomona,CA.
10019-M............. Structural Composites 4 08-31-2005
Industries, Pomona,CA.
10915-M............. Luxfer Gas Cylinders 1 08-31-2005
(Composite, Cylinder
Division), Riverside,
CA.
6263-M.............. Amtrol, Inc., West 4 08-31-2005
Warwick, RI.
10319-M............. Amtrol, Inc., West 4 08-31-2005
Warwick, RI.
11970-M............. ExxonMobile Chemical 4 08-31-2005
Company, Mont Belvieu,
TX.
[[Page 46917]]
13580-M............. Carleton Technologies 4 09-30-2005
Inc., Orchard Park, NY.
12384-M............. OilAir Hydraulics, 4 09-30-2005
Inc., Houston, TX.
13327-M............. Hawk FRP LLC, Ardmore, 1 08-31-2005
OK.
7774-M.............. Pipe Recovery Systems, 4 08-31-2005
Inc., Houston, TX.
13488-M............. Faber Industries Spa, 4 08-31-2005
(U.S. Agent: Kaplan
Industries, Maple
Shade, NJ).
12988-M............. Air Products & 4 08-31-2005
Chemicals, Inc.,
Allentown, PA.
12284-M............. The American Traffic 1 08-31-2005
Safety Services, Assn.
(ATSSA),
Fredericksburg, VA.
11579-M............. Dyno Nobel, Inc., Salt 4 08-31-2005
Lake City, UT.
11241-M............. Rohm and Haas Co., 1 09-30-2005
Philadelphia, PA.
7280-M.............. Department of Defense, 4 08-31-2005
Ft. Eustis, VA.
10878-M............. Tankcon FRP Inc., 1, 3 08-31-2005
Boisbriand, Qc.
8162-M.............. Structural Composites 4 08-31-2005
Industries, Pomona, CA.
8718-M.............. Structural Composites 4 08-31-2005
Industries, Pomona, CA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Renewal of Exemptions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason for Estimated date
Application No. Applicant delay of completion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9649-X..................................... U.S. Department of Defense, Fort 1, 3 08-31-2005
Eustis, VA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 05-15860 Filed 8-10-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-M