Air Force Instruction 33-332; Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation, 46405 [05-15787]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 10, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
whichever is currently in effect, shall be
deemed filed on the same business day.
(4) Mandatory compliance date.
Compliance with paragraph (a)(2) of this
section and any applicable requirements
that such statements must be posted on
a registered national bank’s Web site are
mandatory for statements required to be
filed on or after January 1, 2004.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 3, 2005.
Julie L. Williams,
Acting Comptroller of the Currency.
[FR Doc. 05–15750 Filed 8–9–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Air Force Instruction 33–332; Privacy
Act of 1974; Implementation
Department of the Air Force.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Air
Force is deleting an exemption rule for
the system of records F031 DOD A,
entitled ‘‘Joint Personnel Adjudication
System (JPAS)’’. The system of records
was transferred to the Defense Security
Service and assigned the identifier V5–
05, entitled ‘‘Joint Personnel
Adjudication System (JPAS)’’, which
was published in the Federal Register
on July 1, 2005 (70 FR 38120). The
exemption rule for the system of records
also was transferred to the Defense
Security Service and incorporated into
its existing rules at 32 CFR 321.13(h)
which was published in the Federal
Register on July 1, 2005 (70 FR 38009).
The exemption rule for the system of
records is therefore being deleted.
DATES: Effective August 10, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs.
Novella Hill at (703) 588–7855.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
are not significant rules. The rules do
not (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
13:34 Aug 09, 2005
Jkt 205001
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because they are concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act
systems of records within the
Department of Defense.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
32 CFR Part 806b
VerDate jul<14>2003
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive order.
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
impose no information requirements
beyond the Department of Defense and
that the information collected within
the Department of Defense is necessary
and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a,
known as the Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rulemaking for the Department of
Defense does not involve a Federal
mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
and that such rulemaking will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have federalism implications.
The rules do not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 806b
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR 806b is to be
amended to read as follows:
I
PART 806B—PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 806b continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5
U.S.C. 552a).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Appendix D
46405
[Amended]
2. In part 806b, paragraph (f)(19) of
Appendix D is removed and reserved as
follows:
I
Appendix D to Part 806b—General and
Specific Exemptions
*
*
*
*
*
(f)(19) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 4, 2005.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05–15787 Filed 8–9–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–05–073]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Manasquan River, Manasquan
Inlet and Atlantic Ocean, Point
Pleasant Beach to Bay Head, NJ,
Change of Location
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule;
amendment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: On July 15, 2005, the Coast
Guard published a temporary final rule
in the Federal Register establishing
temporary special local regulations for
the ‘‘Point Pleasant OPA/NJ Offshore
Grand Prix’’, a marine event to be held
on the waters of the Manasquan River,
Manasquan Inlet and Atlantic Ocean
between Point Pleasant Beach and Bay
Head, New Jersey. On July 21, 2005, the
Coast Guard learned that this marine
event was proposed to be conducted at
a different location. This rule changes
the location of the temporary regulated
area. These special local regulations are
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in the regulated area during the
event.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9:30
a.m. on August 12, 2005, to 3:30 p.m. on
August 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket CGD05–05–
073 and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander (oax), Fifth
Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford
Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704–
E:\FR\FM\10AUR1.SGM
10AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 10, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 46405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-15787]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
32 CFR Part 806b
Air Force Instruction 33-332; Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
AGENCY: Department of the Air Force.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Air Force is deleting an exemption rule
for the system of records F031 DOD A, entitled ``Joint Personnel
Adjudication System (JPAS)''. The system of records was transferred to
the Defense Security Service and assigned the identifier V5-05,
entitled ``Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS)'', which was
published in the Federal Register on July 1, 2005 (70 FR 38120). The
exemption rule for the system of records also was transferred to the
Defense Security Service and incorporated into its existing rules at 32
CFR 321.13(h) which was published in the Federal Register on July 1,
2005 (70 FR 38009). The exemption rule for the system of records is
therefore being deleted.
DATES: Effective August 10, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Novella Hill at (703) 588-7855.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity;
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities because they are concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department
of Defense.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of
Defense and that the information collected within the Department of
Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the
Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rulemaking for the
Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and
that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 806b
Privacy.
0
Accordingly, 32 CFR 806b is to be amended to read as follows:
PART 806B--PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 806b continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
Appendix D [Amended]
0
2. In part 806b, paragraph (f)(19) of Appendix D is removed and
reserved as follows:
Appendix D to Part 806b--General and Specific Exemptions
* * * * *
(f)(19) [Reserved]
* * * * *
Dated: August 4, 2005.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05-15787 Filed 8-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P