Air Force Instruction 33-332; Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation, 46405 [05-15787]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 10, 2005 / Rules and Regulations whichever is currently in effect, shall be deemed filed on the same business day. (4) Mandatory compliance date. Compliance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section and any applicable requirements that such statements must be posted on a registered national bank’s Web site are mandatory for statements required to be filed on or after January 1, 2004. * * * * * Dated: August 3, 2005. Julie L. Williams, Acting Comptroller of the Currency. [FR Doc. 05–15750 Filed 8–9–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810–33–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Air Force Air Force Instruction 33–332; Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation Department of the Air Force. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Department of the Air Force is deleting an exemption rule for the system of records F031 DOD A, entitled ‘‘Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS)’’. The system of records was transferred to the Defense Security Service and assigned the identifier V5– 05, entitled ‘‘Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS)’’, which was published in the Federal Register on July 1, 2005 (70 FR 38120). The exemption rule for the system of records also was transferred to the Defense Security Service and incorporated into its existing rules at 32 CFR 321.13(h) which was published in the Federal Register on July 1, 2005 (70 FR 38009). The exemption rule for the system of records is therefore being deleted. DATES: Effective August 10, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Novella Hill at (703) 588–7855. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by 13:34 Aug 09, 2005 Jkt 205001 Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6) It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they are concerned only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department of Defense. Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) 32 CFR Part 806b VerDate jul<14>2003 another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive order. It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of Defense and that the information collected within the Department of Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the Privacy Act of 1974. Section 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rulemaking for the Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 806b Privacy. Accordingly, 32 CFR 806b is to be amended to read as follows: I PART 806B—PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM 1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 806b continues to read as follows: I Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a). PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Appendix D 46405 [Amended] 2. In part 806b, paragraph (f)(19) of Appendix D is removed and reserved as follows: I Appendix D to Part 806b—General and Specific Exemptions * * * * * (f)(19) [Reserved] * * * * * Dated: August 4, 2005. Jeannette Owings-Ballard, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 05–15787 Filed 8–9–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 100 [CGD05–05–073] RIN 1625–AA08 Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Manasquan River, Manasquan Inlet and Atlantic Ocean, Point Pleasant Beach to Bay Head, NJ, Change of Location Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule; amendment. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: On July 15, 2005, the Coast Guard published a temporary final rule in the Federal Register establishing temporary special local regulations for the ‘‘Point Pleasant OPA/NJ Offshore Grand Prix’’, a marine event to be held on the waters of the Manasquan River, Manasquan Inlet and Atlantic Ocean between Point Pleasant Beach and Bay Head, New Jersey. On July 21, 2005, the Coast Guard learned that this marine event was proposed to be conducted at a different location. This rule changes the location of the temporary regulated area. These special local regulations are necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during the event. This action is intended to restrict vessel traffic in the regulated area during the event. DATES: This rule is effective from 9:30 a.m. on August 12, 2005, to 3:30 p.m. on August 13, 2005. ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, are part of docket CGD05–05– 073 and are available for inspection or copying at Commander (oax), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704– E:\FR\FM\10AUR1.SGM 10AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 10, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 46405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-15787]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

32 CFR Part 806b


Air Force Instruction 33-332; Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Air Force is deleting an exemption rule 
for the system of records F031 DOD A, entitled ``Joint Personnel 
Adjudication System (JPAS)''. The system of records was transferred to 
the Defense Security Service and assigned the identifier V5-05, 
entitled ``Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS)'', which was 
published in the Federal Register on July 1, 2005 (70 FR 38120). The 
exemption rule for the system of records also was transferred to the 
Defense Security Service and incorporated into its existing rules at 32 
CFR 321.13(h) which was published in the Federal Register on July 1, 
2005 (70 FR 38009). The exemption rule for the system of records is 
therefore being deleted.

DATES: Effective August 10, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Novella Hill at (703) 588-7855.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual 
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a 
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity; 
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, 
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious 
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by 
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of 
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and 
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy 
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or 
the principles set forth in this Executive order.

Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number 
of small entities because they are concerned only with the 
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department 
of Defense.

Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of 
Defense and that the information collected within the Department of 
Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the 
Privacy Act of 1974.

Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rulemaking for the 
Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may 
result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and 
that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments.

Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have 
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 806b

    Privacy.

0
Accordingly, 32 CFR 806b is to be amended to read as follows:

PART 806B--PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM

0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 806b continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).

Appendix D [Amended]

0
2. In part 806b, paragraph (f)(19) of Appendix D is removed and 
reserved as follows:

Appendix D to Part 806b--General and Specific Exemptions

* * * * *
    (f)(19) [Reserved]
* * * * *

    Dated: August 4, 2005.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05-15787 Filed 8-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.