Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service Notice of Intent To Extend a Currently Approved Information Collection, 46471-46472 [05-15768]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
46471
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 153
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
August 4, 2005.
The Department of Agriculture has
submitted the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology should be addressed to: Desk
Officer for Agriculture, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB),
OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or
fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental
Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail
Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250–
7602. Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured
of having their full effect if received
within 30 days of this notification.
Copies of the submission(s) may be
obtained by calling (202) 720–8958.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:02 Aug 09, 2005
Jkt 205001
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Title: Agricultural Resource
Management, Chemical Use, and Postharvest Chemical Use Surveys.
OMB Control Number: 0535–0218.
Summary of Collection: The primary
objectives of the National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) is to provide
the public with timely and reliable
agricultural production and economic
statistics, as well as environmental and
specialty agricultural related statistics.
Three surveys—the Agricultural
Resource Management Study, the Fruit
and Vegetable Chemical Use Surveys,
and the Post-harvest Chemical Use
Survey—are critical to NASS’ ability to
fulfill these objectives and to build the
Congressionally mandated database on
agricultural chemical use and related
farm practices. NASS uses a variety of
survey instruments to collect the
information in conjunction with these
studies.
Need and Use of the Information: The
Agricultural Resource Management
Study provides a robust data base of
information to address varied needs of
policy makers. There are many uses for
the information from this study
including an evaluation of the safety of
the Nation’s food supply; input to the
farm sector portion of the gross
domestic product; and to provide a
barometer on the financial condition of
farm businesses. Data from the Fruit and
Vegetable Chemical Use Surveys is used
to assess the environmental and
economic implications of various
program and policies and the impact on
agricultural producers and consumers.
The results of the Post-harvest Chemical
Use Survey are used by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
to develop Food Quality Protection Act
risk assessments. Other organizations
use this data to make sound regulatory
decisions.
Description of Respondents: Farms.
Number of Respondents: 76,433.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
Annually.
Total Burden Hours: 58,345.
Title: Census of Aquaculture.
OMB Control Number: 0535–0237.
Summary of Collection: The primary
objective of the 2005 Census of
Aquaculture is to obtain a
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comprehensive and detailed picture of
the aquaculture sector of the economy.
Authority to administer the census of
aquaculture is covered by Public Law
105–113, the Census of Agriculture Act
of 1997, and U.S. Code Title 7. The
census of aquaculture will be the only
source of data comparable and
consistent at the national and State
levels. It will cover all operations,
commercial or noncommercial, from
which $1,000 or more of aquaculture
products were sold or normally would
have been sold during the census year.
The census of aquaculture is one of a
series of special study programs that
comprise the follow-ons to the census of
agriculture and is designed to provide
more detailed statistics on the
aquaculture industry.
Need and Use of the Information: The
National Agricultural Statistics Service
will collect data to provide a
comprehensive inventory on the
number of operations, water acreage,
method of production, total production,
sales outlets, sales by aquaculture
species, products distributed for
restoration or conservation by species,
and farm employment. These data will
provide information on the aquaculture
industry necessary for farmers,
government and various groups
concerned with the aquaculture
industry to evaluate policy and
programs, make marketing decisions
and determine the economic impact on
the economy.
Description of Respondents: Farms.
Number of Respondents: 10,000.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
One-time (Every 5-years).
Total Burden Hours: 4,222.
Charlene Parker,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–15767 Filed 8–9–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cooperative State Research,
Education, and Extension Service
Notice of Intent To Extend a Currently
Approved Information Collection
Cooperative State Research,
Education, and Extension Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
46472
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 10, 2005 / Notices
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) regulations at 5 CFR part 1320,
this notice announces the intent of the
Cooperative State Research, Education,
and Extension Service (CSREES) to
request approval for an extension of the
currently approved information
collection for the CSREES proposal
review process.
DATES: Written comments on this notice
must be received by October 11, 2005,
to be assured of consideration.
Comments received after that date will
be considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
by any of the following methods: Mail:
CSREES, USDA, STOP 2216, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–2216; Hand
Delivery/Courier: 800 9th Street, SW.,
Waterfront Centre, Room 4217,
Washington, DC 20024; Fax: 202–720–
0857; or e-mail:
jhitchcock@csrees.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Hitchcock, (202) 720–4343.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: CSREES Proposal Review
Process.
OMB Number: 0524–0041.
Expiration Date of Current Approval:
06/30/2006.
Type of Request: Intent to seek
approval for the revision of a currently
approved information collection for
three years.
Abstract: CSREES is responsible for
performing a review of proposals
submitted to CSREES competitive award
programs in accordance with section
103(a) of the Agricultural Research,
Extension, and Education Reform Act of
1998, 7 U.S.C. 7613(a). Reviews are
undertaken to ensure that projects
supported by CSREES are of high
quality and are consistent with the goals
and requirements of the funding
program.
Proposals submitted to CSREES
undergo a programmatic evaluation to
determine worthiness of Federal
support. The evaluations consist of a
peer panel review and may also entail
an assessment by Federal employees
and mail-in (ad-hoc) reviews.
Need and Use of the Information: The
information collected from the
evaluations is used to support CSREES
grant programs. CSREES uses the results
of each proposal evaluation to
determine whether a proposal should be
declined or recommended for award.
When CSREES has rendered a decision,
copies of reviews, excluding the names
of the reviewers and summaries of
review panel deliberations, if any, are
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:02 Aug 09, 2005
Jkt 205001
provided to the submitting Project
Director.
Given the highly technical nature of
many of these proposals, the quality of
the peer review greatly depends on the
appropriate matching of the subject
matter of the proposal with the
technical expertise of the potential
reviewer. In order to obtain this
information, an electronic questionnaire
is used to collect information about
potential panel and ad-hoc reviewers. If
the reviewer is already in our database,
the questionnaire asks potential
reviewers to update their basic
biographical information including
address, contact information,
professional expertise, and their
availability to review for CSREES in the
future. New reviewers are prompted to
complete the questionnaire. This
information has been invaluable in the
CSREES review process, which has been
recognized by the grantee and grantor
community for its quality.
The applications and associated
materials made available to reviewers,
as well as the discussions that take
place during panel review meetings are
strictly confidential and are not to be
disclosed to or discussed with anyone
who has not officially been designated
to participate in the review process.
While each panelist certifies when
preparing a review that they do not have
a conflict of interest with a particular
application and will maintain its
confidentiality in the Peer Review
System, CSREES collects a certification
of the panelist intent at the time of the
panel review proceedings to emphasize
and reinforce confidentiality not only of
applications and reviews but also panel
discussions. On the Conflict of Interest
and Confidentiality Certification Form,
the panelists affirm they understand the
conflict of interest guidelines and will
not be involved in the review of the
application(s) where a conflict exists.
Panelists also affirm their intent to
maintain the confidentiality of the panel
process and not disclose to another
individual any information related to
the peer review or use any information
for personal benefit.
Estimate of Burden: CSREES estimates
that anywhere from one hour to twenty
hours may be required to review a
proposal. Approximately five hours are
required to review an average proposal.
Each proposal receives an average of
four reviews, accounting for an annual
burden of 20 hours per proposal.
CSREES estimates it receives 4,600
proposals each year. The total annual
burden in reviewing proposals is 92,000
hours. CSREES estimates that the
potential reviewer questionnaire takes
10 minutes to complete. The database
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
consists of approximately 50,000
reviewers. The total annual burden on
reviewers completing the questionnaire
is 8,330 hours. CSREES estimates that
the potential Conflict of Interest and
Confidentiality Certification Form takes
10 minutes to complete. The agency has
approximately 1,000 panelists each
year. The total annual burden of the
certification form is 167 hours. The total
annual burden of these components of
the entire review process is 100,497
hours.
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Agency estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
to OMB for approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record.
Done in Washington, DC, this 1st day of
August, 2005.
Merle D. Pierson,
Deputy Under Secretary, Research,
Education, and Economics.
[FR Doc. 05–15768 Filed 8–9–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc.;
Notice of Intent To Hold Public
Scoping Meetings and Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement
Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to hold public
scoping meetings and prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service
(RUS) intends to hold public scoping
meetings and prepare an environmental
impact statement (EIS) in connection
with possible impacts related to a
project proposed by Associated Electric
Cooperative, Inc. (AECI), with
headquarters in Springfield, Missouri.
The proposal consists of the
construction and operation of a nominal
660 megawatt coal-based electrical
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 10, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46471-46472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-15768]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service
Notice of Intent To Extend a Currently Approved Information Collection
AGENCY: Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 46472]]
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations at 5 CFR part 1320,
this notice announces the intent of the Cooperative State Research,
Education, and Extension Service (CSREES) to request approval for an
extension of the currently approved information collection for the
CSREES proposal review process.
DATES: Written comments on this notice must be received by October 11,
2005, to be assured of consideration. Comments received after that date
will be considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, by any of the following methods:
Mail: CSREES, USDA, STOP 2216, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-2216; Hand Delivery/Courier: 800 9th Street, SW.,
Waterfront Centre, Room 4217, Washington, DC 20024; Fax: 202-720-0857;
or e-mail: jhitchcock@csrees.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Hitchcock, (202) 720-4343.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: CSREES Proposal Review Process.
OMB Number: 0524-0041.
Expiration Date of Current Approval: 06/30/2006.
Type of Request: Intent to seek approval for the revision of a
currently approved information collection for three years.
Abstract: CSREES is responsible for performing a review of
proposals submitted to CSREES competitive award programs in accordance
with section 103(a) of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and
Education Reform Act of 1998, 7 U.S.C. 7613(a). Reviews are undertaken
to ensure that projects supported by CSREES are of high quality and are
consistent with the goals and requirements of the funding program.
Proposals submitted to CSREES undergo a programmatic evaluation to
determine worthiness of Federal support. The evaluations consist of a
peer panel review and may also entail an assessment by Federal
employees and mail-in (ad-hoc) reviews.
Need and Use of the Information: The information collected from the
evaluations is used to support CSREES grant programs. CSREES uses the
results of each proposal evaluation to determine whether a proposal
should be declined or recommended for award. When CSREES has rendered a
decision, copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers and
summaries of review panel deliberations, if any, are provided to the
submitting Project Director.
Given the highly technical nature of many of these proposals, the
quality of the peer review greatly depends on the appropriate matching
of the subject matter of the proposal with the technical expertise of
the potential reviewer. In order to obtain this information, an
electronic questionnaire is used to collect information about potential
panel and ad-hoc reviewers. If the reviewer is already in our database,
the questionnaire asks potential reviewers to update their basic
biographical information including address, contact information,
professional expertise, and their availability to review for CSREES in
the future. New reviewers are prompted to complete the questionnaire.
This information has been invaluable in the CSREES review process,
which has been recognized by the grantee and grantor community for its
quality.
The applications and associated materials made available to
reviewers, as well as the discussions that take place during panel
review meetings are strictly confidential and are not to be disclosed
to or discussed with anyone who has not officially been designated to
participate in the review process. While each panelist certifies when
preparing a review that they do not have a conflict of interest with a
particular application and will maintain its confidentiality in the
Peer Review System, CSREES collects a certification of the panelist
intent at the time of the panel review proceedings to emphasize and
reinforce confidentiality not only of applications and reviews but also
panel discussions. On the Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality
Certification Form, the panelists affirm they understand the conflict
of interest guidelines and will not be involved in the review of the
application(s) where a conflict exists. Panelists also affirm their
intent to maintain the confidentiality of the panel process and not
disclose to another individual any information related to the peer
review or use any information for personal benefit.
Estimate of Burden: CSREES estimates that anywhere from one hour to
twenty hours may be required to review a proposal. Approximately five
hours are required to review an average proposal. Each proposal
receives an average of four reviews, accounting for an annual burden of
20 hours per proposal. CSREES estimates it receives 4,600 proposals
each year. The total annual burden in reviewing proposals is 92,000
hours. CSREES estimates that the potential reviewer questionnaire takes
10 minutes to complete. The database consists of approximately 50,000
reviewers. The total annual burden on reviewers completing the
questionnaire is 8,330 hours. CSREES estimates that the potential
Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Certification Form takes 10
minutes to complete. The agency has approximately 1,000 panelists each
year. The total annual burden of the certification form is 167 hours.
The total annual burden of these components of the entire review
process is 100,497 hours.
Comments: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request to OMB for approval. All comments will become a matter of
public record.
Done in Washington, DC, this 1st day of August, 2005.
Merle D. Pierson,
Deputy Under Secretary, Research, Education, and Economics.
[FR Doc. 05-15768 Filed 8-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-22-P
