Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit, 46168-46169 [05-15739]
Download as PDF
46168
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 9, 2005 / Notices
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$94,998, which includes $0 annualized
capital/startup costs, $18,180 annual
O&M costs, and $76,818 annual labor
costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is no
change in the total estimated burden
hours currently identified in the OMB
Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens.
Dated: July 28, 2005.
Oscar Morales,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 05–15745 Filed 8–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–7949–6]
Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air
Act Citizen Suit
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Consent
Decree; request for public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended
(‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is
hereby given of a proposed consent
decree, to address a lawsuit filed by
Sierra Club and United States Public
Interest Research Group (collectively,
‘‘Plaintiffs’’): Sierra Club, et al. v.
Johnson, No. 1:04CV00094 (RBW)
(D.D.C.) to compel EPA to issue further
regulations containing requirements to
control hazardous air pollutants from
motor vehicles and motor vehicle fuels.
The proposed consent decree would
establish a deadline of February 28,
2006 for EPA to sign a notice of
proposed rulemaking containing
requirements to control hazardous air
pollutants from motor vehicles and
motor vehicle fuels as the Administrator
determines are appropriate pursuant to
section 202(l)(2) of the Act, or, in the
alternative, propose that no such
requirements are necessary. No later
than February 9, 2007, EPA shall sign a
final rule taking final action on such
proposal.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed consent decree must be
received by September 8, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket ID number OGC–
2005–0010, online at https://
www.epa.gov/edocket (EPA’s preferred
method); by e-mail to
oei.docket@epa.gov; mailed to EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; or by
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:52 Aug 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
hand delivery or courier to EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room B102, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. Comments on a disk or CDROM should be formatted in
Wordperfect or ASCII file, avoiding the
use of special characters and any form
of encryption, and may be mailed to the
mailing address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Silverman, Air and Radiation
Law Office (2366A), Office of General
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202)
564–5523.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the
Proposed Consent Decree
The proposed consent decree would
establish a schedule for EPA to take
action pursuant to section 202(l)(2) of
the Clean Air Act. That provision
requires EPA to issue regulations
controlling emissions of toxic air
pollutants from motor vehicles and
motor vehicle fuels. EPA is to establish
standards for motor vehicles and motor
vehicle fuels reflecting the greatest
degree of emission reduction of
hazardous air pollutants achievable
through application of technology
which will be available, taking into
consideration, among other things, costs
of the technology, noise, energy and
safety factors, and lead time.
EPA issued an initial set of standards
implementing this provision, and as
part of those regulations, indicated that
the agency would propose further
requirements considered appropriate by
July 1, 2003, and would take final action
on such a proposal by July 1, 2004. 40
CFR 80.1045 (‘‘What additional
rulemaking will EPA conduct?’’). EPA
did not propose rules or take final
action by these dates.
Plaintiffs filed suit pursuant to section
304(a)(2) of the Act (42 U.S.C.
7604(a)(2)) claiming that this regulation
established a mandatory duty to act by
the dates specified in the regulation.
EPA moved to dismiss, arguing that the
rule did not create a mandatory duty,
and if it did, it was not a duty arising
under the relevant chapter of the Act, as
required by section 304(a)(2). The
District Court rejected both arguments,
holding that the rule created a
mandatory duty and that it arose from
the Clean Air Act. Sierra Club v. Leavitt,
355 F. Supp. 2d 544, 557 (D.D.C. 2005).
Rather than litigate deadlines for EPA
to take the actions specified in section
80.1045, the parties have negotiated a
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
draft consent decree. Under the terms of
the proposed decree, no later than
February 28, 2006, EPA shall sign a
proposed rule containing requirements
to control hazardous air pollutants from
motor vehicles and motor vehicle fuels
as the Administrator determines are
appropriate pursuant to section 202(l)(2)
of the Act, or, in the alternative, propose
that no such requirements are necessary.
No later than February 9, 2007, EPA
shall sign a final rule taking final action
on that proposal.
For a period of thirty (30) days
following the date of publication of this
notice, the Agency will receive written
comments relating to the proposed
consent decree from persons who were
not named as parties or interveners to
the litigation in question. EPA or the
Department of Justice may withdraw or
withhold consent to the proposed
consent decree if the comments disclose
facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate,
improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the Act. Unless
EPA or the Department of Justice
determine, based on any comment
which may be submitted, that consent to
the consent decree should be
withdrawn, the terms of the decree will
be affirmed.
II. Additional Information About
Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree
A. How Can I Get a Copy of the Consent
Decree?
EPA has established an official public
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. OGC–2005–0010 which contains a
copy of the consent decree. The official
public docket is available for public
viewing at the Office of Environmental
Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA
Docket Center, EPA West, Room B102,
1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA Docket
Center Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OEI
Docket is (202) 566–1752.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA
Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/
to submit or view public comments,
access the index listing of the contents
of the official public docket, and to
access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically.
Once in the system, select ‘‘search,’’
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 9, 2005 / Notices
then key in the appropriate docket
identification number.
It is important to note that EPA’s
policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing in EPA’s electronic public
docket as EPA receives them and
without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute
is not included in the official public
docket or in EPA’s electronic public
docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted
material, including copyrighted material
contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. Although not all docket
materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any
of the publicly available docket
materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA’s electronic public
docket, EPA’s electronic mail (e-mail)
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to the Docket without going
through EPA’s electronic public docket,
your e-mail address is automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the official
public docket, and made available in
EPA’s electronic public docket.
B. How and to Whom Do I Submit
Comments?
You may submit comments as
provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment
period. Comments received after the
close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to
consider these late comments.
If you submit an electronic comment,
EPA recommends that you include your
name, mailing address, and an e-mail
address or other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD ROM you submit. This
ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows
EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information
on the substance of your comment. Any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Your use of EPA’s electronic public
docket to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA’s preferred method
for receiving comments. The electronic
public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, which means EPA will
not know your identity, e-mail address,
or other contact information unless you
AGENCY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:52 Aug 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
Dated: August 1, 2005.
Richard B. Ossias,
Acting Associate General Counsel, Air and
Radiation Law Office, Office of General
Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05–15739 Filed 8–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[FRL–7950–2]
Proposed Settlement Agreement,
Clean Air Act Petitions for Review
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Settlement
Agreement; request for public comment.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended
(‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is
hereby given of a proposed settlement
agreement, to address petitions for
review filed by UCB Films, Inc. and
Teepak LLC (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’):
UCB Films, Inc., et al. v. EPA, No. 02–
1250 (D.C. Cir.) consolidated with
Teepak, LLC v. EPA, No. 02–1252 (D.C.
Cir.). On or about August 9, 2002,
Petitioners filed petitions for review of
EPA’s final rule ‘‘National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Cellulose Products Manufacturing’’
published at 67 FR 40043 (June 11,
2002). Under the terms of the proposed
settlement agreement, EPA intends to
make certain amendments to portions of
the rule that may resolve the claims
raised by Petitioners.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed settlement agreement must be
received by September 8, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket ID number OGC–
2005–0011, online at https://
www.epa.gov/edocket (EPA’s preferred
method); by e-mail to
oei.docket@epa.gov; mailed to EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; or by
hand delivery or courier to EPA Docket
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Center, EPA West, Room B102, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. Comments on a disk or CD–
ROM should be formatted in
Wordperfect or ASCII file, avoiding the
use of special characters and any form
of encryption, and may be mailed to the
mailing address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diane McConkey, Air and Radiation
Law Office (2344A), Office of General
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202)
564–5588.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the
Proposed Settlement
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PO 00000
46169
Sfmt 4703
The proposed settlement agreement is
in response to Petitioners’ requests for
specific changes to the final rule
entitled ‘‘National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Cellulose
Products Manufacturing.’’ Specifically,
the agreement concerns amendments to
subpart UUUU of 40 CFR part 63 that
would revise the work practice
standards, general and initial
compliance requirements, definitions,
and General Provisions applicability. In
addition, the amendments would
correct typographical, formatting, and
cross-referencing errors identified after
the final rule was published.
Under the proposed settlement
agreement, no later than 3 months after
the agreement is final EPA is to sign a
notice of proposed rulemaking or a
direct final rule with a concurrent
proposal, proposing or stating , as
applicable, that 40 CFR part 63, subpart
UUUU shall be amended as provided in
Appendix A, which contains a draft of
the amendments in question.
For a period of thirty (30) days
following the date of publication of this
notice, the Agency will receive written
comments relating to the proposed
settlement agreement from persons who
were not named as parties or interveners
to the litigation in question. EPA or the
Department of Justice may withdraw or
withhold consent to the proposed
settlement agreement if the comments
disclose facts or considerations that
indicate that such consent is
inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or
inconsistent with the requirements of
the Act. Unless EPA or the Department
of Justice determines, based on any
comment which may be submitted, that
consent to the settlement agreement
should be withdrawn, the terms of the
agreement will be affirmed.
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46168-46169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-15739]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-7949-6]
Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Consent Decree; request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (``Act''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a
proposed consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Sierra Club and
United States Public Interest Research Group (collectively,
``Plaintiffs''): Sierra Club, et al. v. Johnson, No. 1:04CV00094 (RBW)
(D.D.C.) to compel EPA to issue further regulations containing
requirements to control hazardous air pollutants from motor vehicles
and motor vehicle fuels. The proposed consent decree would establish a
deadline of February 28, 2006 for EPA to sign a notice of proposed
rulemaking containing requirements to control hazardous air pollutants
from motor vehicles and motor vehicle fuels as the Administrator
determines are appropriate pursuant to section 202(l)(2) of the Act,
or, in the alternative, propose that no such requirements are
necessary. No later than February 9, 2007, EPA shall sign a final rule
taking final action on such proposal.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed consent decree must be received
by September 8, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket ID number OGC-
2005-0010, online at https://www.epa.gov/edocket (EPA's preferred
method); by e-mail to oei.docket@epa.gov; mailed to EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; or by hand delivery or courier to
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD-ROM should be
formatted in Wordperfect or ASCII file, avoiding the use of special
characters and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the mailing
address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Silverman, Air and Radiation
Law Office (2366A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone: (202) 564-5523.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the Proposed Consent Decree
The proposed consent decree would establish a schedule for EPA to
take action pursuant to section 202(l)(2) of the Clean Air Act. That
provision requires EPA to issue regulations controlling emissions of
toxic air pollutants from motor vehicles and motor vehicle fuels. EPA
is to establish standards for motor vehicles and motor vehicle fuels
reflecting the greatest degree of emission reduction of hazardous air
pollutants achievable through application of technology which will be
available, taking into consideration, among other things, costs of the
technology, noise, energy and safety factors, and lead time.
EPA issued an initial set of standards implementing this provision,
and as part of those regulations, indicated that the agency would
propose further requirements considered appropriate by July 1, 2003,
and would take final action on such a proposal by July 1, 2004. 40 CFR
80.1045 (``What additional rulemaking will EPA conduct?''). EPA did not
propose rules or take final action by these dates.
Plaintiffs filed suit pursuant to section 304(a)(2) of the Act (42
U.S.C. 7604(a)(2)) claiming that this regulation established a
mandatory duty to act by the dates specified in the regulation. EPA
moved to dismiss, arguing that the rule did not create a mandatory
duty, and if it did, it was not a duty arising under the relevant
chapter of the Act, as required by section 304(a)(2). The District
Court rejected both arguments, holding that the rule created a
mandatory duty and that it arose from the Clean Air Act. Sierra Club v.
Leavitt, 355 F. Supp. 2d 544, 557 (D.D.C. 2005).
Rather than litigate deadlines for EPA to take the actions
specified in section 80.1045, the parties have negotiated a draft
consent decree. Under the terms of the proposed decree, no later than
February 28, 2006, EPA shall sign a proposed rule containing
requirements to control hazardous air pollutants from motor vehicles
and motor vehicle fuels as the Administrator determines are appropriate
pursuant to section 202(l)(2) of the Act, or, in the alternative,
propose that no such requirements are necessary. No later than February
9, 2007, EPA shall sign a final rule taking final action on that
proposal.
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to
the proposed consent decree from persons who were not named as parties
or interveners to the litigation in question. EPA or the Department of
Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed consent decree
if the comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the Department of
Justice determine, based on any comment which may be submitted, that
consent to the consent decree should be withdrawn, the terms of the
decree will be affirmed.
II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree
A. How Can I Get a Copy of the Consent Decree?
EPA has established an official public docket for this action under
Docket ID No. OGC-2005-0010 which contains a copy of the consent
decree. The official public docket is available for public viewing at
the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the
telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566-1752.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may
use EPA Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/ to submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that
are available electronically. Once in the system, select ``search,''
[[Page 46169]]
then key in the appropriate docket identification number.
It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing in EPA's electronic public docket as EPA receives
them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted
material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute is not included in the official
public docket or in EPA's electronic public docket. EPA's policy is
that copyrighted material, including copyrighted material contained in
a public comment, will not be placed in EPA's electronic public docket
but will be available only in printed, paper form in the official
public docket. Although not all docket materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available
docket materials through the EPA Docket Center.
B. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an e-mail address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD
ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to submit comments to
EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments.
The electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(e-mail) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to the Docket without going through EPA's
electronic public docket, your e-mail address is automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the official
public docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
Dated: August 1, 2005.
Richard B. Ossias,
Acting Associate General Counsel, Air and Radiation Law Office, Office
of General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-15739 Filed 8-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P